+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

Date post: 07-Jan-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
35
Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent Shelley J. Correll Director, Clayman Institute for Gender Research Professor of Sociology Professor of Organizational Behavior (courtesy) Stanford University
Transcript
Page 1: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

Shelley J. CorrellDirector, Clayman Institute for Gender Research

Professor of SociologyProfessor of Organizational Behavior (courtesy)

Stanford University

Page 2: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Inclusive workplaces

Harness all of the talent in our diverse society and create environments where all individuals

can fully thrive.

Page 3: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Underrepresentation of women in the US

• Approximately 4.5% of the Fortune 500 CEOs are women.• Women hold 14% of executive officer positions. • Women hold 18% of elected congressional offices. • Women hold 17.2% of research university presidencies. • Women of color are more underrepresented.

Page 4: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Women in the legal profession

• Approximately 45% of law associates are women, which mirrors law school enrollment.

• 20% of partners and 17% of equity partners are women.• 4% of managing partners at the largest 200 firms are

women. • 21% of general counsel positions in F-500 are women

(82% white overall). • 17% of general counsel positions in F 501-1000 are women

(92% white overall).

American Bar Association 2014

Page 5: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Goldin & Rouse 2000

Page 6: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Goldin & Rouse 2000

Page 7: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Bias is an error in decision-making.

Page 8: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Stereotypes function as “cognitive shortcuts” in information processing.

Page 9: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Categorization by sex (and race)

Expectations about the individual

Bias in how we process information

Evaluations, opportunities, influence

Page 10: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Stereotypes affect the standard we use to judge the performance of individuals.

Page 11: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

79% 49%

Steinpreis, Anders & Ritzke 1999

Page 12: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Extra scrutiny

“I would need to see evidence that she had gotten these grants and publications on her own.”

“It would be impossible to make such a judgment without teaching evaluations.”

Steinpreis, Anders & Ritzke 1999

Page 13: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Reeves 2014

Thomas Meyer

Seniority: 3rd Year Law AssociateAlma Mater: NYU

Race/Ethnicity: Caucasian

Thomas Meyer

Seniority: 3rd Year Law AssociateAlma Mater: NYU

Race/Ethnicity: African American

Page 14: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Reeves 2014

Thomas Meyer

Seniority: 3rd Year Law AssociateAlma Mater: NYU

Race/Ethnicity: Caucasian

Thomas Meyer

Seniority: 3rd Year Law AssociateAlma Mater: NYU

Race/Ethnicity: African American

3x more edits /comments2x more likely to find mistakes

Presenter
Presentation Notes
7 spelling errors – 6 were found for black Thomas and 3 were found for white Thomas
Page 15: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Reeves 2014

Thomas Meyer

Seniority: 3rd Year Law AssociateAlma Mater: NYU

Race/Ethnicity: Caucasian

Thomas Meyer

Seniority: 3rd Year Law AssociateAlma Mater: NYU

Race/Ethnicity: African American

Score: 4.1 out of 5

“generally good writer but needs to work on…”

“has potential”

“good analytical skills”

Score: 3.2 out of 5

“needs lots of work”

“can’t believe he went to NYU”

“average at best”

Page 16: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Can individuals overcome doubts about their competence by self-promoting their

accomplishments?

Page 17: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Rudman 1998; 2012

more competent

more competent

less likable

Page 18: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Stereotypes affect the criteria we use to judge individuals.

Page 19: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

More education

Uhlmann & Cohen 2005

More experience

Page 20: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

More education

Uhlmann & Cohen 2005

More experience

Page 21: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

More experience

Uhlmann & Cohen 2005

More education

Page 22: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

re are tSourcing, Screening

Team Dynamics

Talent Reviews/Cali

bration

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Performance Review

Interviewing,selecting

Assignments, Promotions

Compensation

Page 23: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

How can we overcome these effects?

Page 24: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Effective solutions require breaking the tendency to use stereotypes as

cognitive shortcuts.

Page 25: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Page 26: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Bias education

Educating about the effects of stereotypes gives well-intentioned men and women the tools to

avoid bias.

Page 27: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Increase accountability & transparency

• Have decision-makers justify their decisions.• Track numerical progress. Organizations manage what they

measure. • Helps avoid the “paradox of meritocracy.”

Castilla & Benard 2010

Page 28: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Establish clear criteria before making evaluations

More experience More education ✔

Page 29: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Other guidelines for assessing performance and potential

• Equalize the bar used in evaluation. • Discard unnecessary criteria that may have inherent bias. • Block undo criticism of women’s and men’s personalities. • Review all evaluations for consistency. • Develop a consistent approach for writing reviews. • Block the automatic use of language.

Clayman Institute 2015

Page 30: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Language and performance evaluations

Supportive

Team Player

Warm

Compassionate

Agreeable

Friendly

Thoughtful

Collaborative

Caring

Confident

Ambitious

Outspoken

Independent

Daring

Intellectual

Driver

Influential

Go-getter

Communal Agentic

Page 31: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

“(Person 1) has a gentle touch that teammates appreciate.”

“(Person 2) got people on board to drive significant results for the organization.”

Correll et al. 2015

Page 32: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Personality vs. Accomplishment

“(She) has a gentle touch that teammates appreciate.”

“(He) got people on board to drive significant results for the organization.”

Correll et al. 2015

Page 33: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

One action you can take tomorrow!

Share the accomplishments of a woman in your network.

Page 34: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.

Share women’s accomplishments

• Female graduate students were rated more positively by undergraduate students after a faculty member vouched for their experience and expertise.

• Form a posse.

Brown & Geis 1984; Williams 2014

Page 35: Blocking bias in the evaluation of talent

© Stanford University 2015. All rights reserved.


Recommended