+ All Categories
Home > Environment > Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Date post: 21-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: neil-hinds
View: 580 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
24
Marine Research Station Pulau Perhentian Marine Park
Transcript
Page 1: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Marine Research Station

Pulau Perhentian Marine Park

Page 2: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Contents

● Introduction– Background– Aims and Objectives

● Methodologies– Reef Health– Tourist Perception

● Data and Analysis ● Key Points and Recommendations

Page 3: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Introduction

● Blue Temple Conservation– UK Non-profit, Research focused

● Ecoteer– Conservation through Education

● Research Team– Who we are

● Why is it important?– Reef Health, Tourism, Economy

Page 4: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Aims and Objectives

● Reef Health– Fish, Invertebrate and Coral

● Tourist Perception– Expenditure, Motivations and Environmental

● Recommendations– Reducing the damage

● Moving Forwards– Research, Procedures and Monitoring

Page 5: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Methodologies; Reef Health

● Reef Health – adapted Reef Check methods– Six 30m transects covering a 30m² area/survey site– Nine fish species identified

● Grouper, Snapper, Baramundi Cod, Sweetlips, Butterflyfish, Moray Eel, Parrotfish, Bumphead Parrotfish, Humphead Wrasse

– Nine Invertebrate species identified● Diadema, Collector, Pencil Urchins, Sea Cucumber, Triton Shell, Crown of

Thorns, Giant Clam, Lobster, Banded Coral Shrimp

– Ten Substrate types identified● Hard Coral (HC), Soft Coral (SC), Recently Killed Coral (RKC), Rock (RC),

Rubble (RB), Sand (SD), Silt (SI), Sponge (SP), Nutrient Indicator Algae (NIA) and Other (OT)

Page 6: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Survey Site Location

1.D'Lagoon

2.Teluk Pauh

3.Shark Point

4.Fish Garden

5.Tanjung Basi

6.Batu Nisan

7.Batu Tabir

Page 7: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Survey Method

Page 8: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

● Fish survey– Conducted first, stop every 5m for 1 minute

● Invertebrate Survey● Substrate Survey

– Record every 50cm

Page 9: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Water Quality - Nutrients● Algae, Diadema and

previous studies

– Indicators of high nutrients in the water

– Some areas worse affected

● Isolated positioning of islands suggests run-off from island resorts and village

● Further research required to identify level of nutrients

Page 10: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Methodologies; Tourists

● Questionnaire– Motivations – Expenditure– Environmental Perceptions

● Resorts and Beaches● Tourists approached

Page 11: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Data and Analysis

● Fish Populations– Snapper (134/30m²),Butterflyfish (71/30m²), Parrotfish (43/30m²),

Grouper (13/30m²)

GrouperButterflyfish

ParrotfishSnapper

Baramundi CodHumphead Wrasse

Bumphead ParrotfishMoray Eel

Sweetlip

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Page 12: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Invertebrate Populations

● Diadema Urchins found in very high numbers● Sea Cucumber and Giant Clams both present● Collector, Pencil, Triton, Coral Shrimp and Lobster –

no sightings

DiademaSea Cucumber

Crown of ThornsGiant Clam

Collector UrchinTriton Shell

Banded Coral ShrimpLobster

Pencil Urchin

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Page 13: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Invertebrate Populations

● Teluk Pauh most densely populated Diadema (719)

● D'Lagoon highest Giant Clam population (234)

● No correlation between Diadema and substrate %

● Suggestions of high algal productivity

● No correlation between Sea Cucumber and Sand %

D'Lagoon

Teluk Pauh

Shark Point

Fish Garden

Tanjung Basi

Batu Nisan

Batu Tabir

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Diadema

Cucumber

Clam

Page 14: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Substrate Cover● Hard Coral Reef Check

guidelines

– 25% = Poor– 25-50% = Fair– 50-75% = Good– 75-100% = Excellent

● 1/7 sites “Good”● 4/7 sites “Fair”● 2/7 sites “Poor”

D'Lagoon

Teluk Pauh

Shark Point

Fish Gardens

Tanjung Basi

Batu Nisan

Batu Tabir

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

HC

SC

NIA

Page 15: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Substrate Cover

Substrate Type Average % Cover

Hard Coral 34.28

Soft Coral 9.13

Recently Killed Coral

1.87

Nutrient Indicator Algae

14.39

Rock 23.57

Rubble 8.47

Sand 6.70

Silt 0.00

Sponge 1.35

Other 0.67

● HC down more than 10% on 2013 Reef Check data

● NIA up on previous 5 year Reef Check data (5-10%)

● Rock cover potential down to coral damage from monsoon and tourism

Page 16: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Tourist Motivations and Perceptions

● 274 tourists surveyed● 50.7% female● 41% stay for one week● 40% motivated by marine life● MYR 1,560.22 average expenditure● 79% went snorkelling● 66% wanted to see Turtles● 49% consider litter to be biggest environmental threat

Page 17: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Tourism Value Estimates● High quality marine life generated MYR 171,624 ● High quality beaches generated MYR 123,257● MYR 15,260 generated by snorkel tours● Turtles generated MYR 283,960.04 for the island

economyTurt les: MYR 244.4 mill ion annually

Marine Life: MYR 147.7 mill ion annually

Beaches: MYR 106.1 mill ion annually

Snorkel tours: MYR 13.1 mill ion annually

Page 18: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Tourism Threat Perceptions

Snorkelling SCUBA Diving Boat Traffic Litter Pollution Tourism0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Percent

● Multiple answers were accepted● Snorkel and Diving neither considered significant issue ● Litter and Boat traffic biggest concern for tourists

– Potentially due to high visibility and aesthetic degradation

Page 19: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Key Points● High Diadema Urchin numbers● High NIA coverage● Reduced Hard Coral coverage

● Higher than normal nutrient levels ● Reduced HC recovery after monsoon impact● Potential damage from tourist activity● Soft Coral potential increase

What does it mean?

Page 20: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Fish Populations● High Butterflyfish

population suggest low aquarium trade

● Low Grouper population suggests potential fishing still occurring with islands or still in recovery from pre-marine park

● Parrotfish numbers reaffirm algal growth

● Low Baramundi Cod and Sweetlips potentially due to slow or lack of recovery from fishing practices

● Whilst low Bumphead recordings, numerous sightings throughout season have been noted

Page 21: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Tourism Key Points

● Turtles and Sharks major attractions

● Marine life key motivator● Snorkelling main activity

undertaken● Economic reliance

identified

Page 22: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Recommendations● Improved signposting

– Behaviour and conservation

● Educated boatmen

– Reliance on turtles and sharks, behaviour

● Resort inclusion

– Include in conservation● Ocean Ambassadors and

eco-tourism

● Increased policing and legislation

– Greater presence and interaction

● More noticeable presence in village and tourist resorts from Eco-agents (Marine Parks and NGOs)

– Presentations, events, raising issues and ideas

Page 23: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Recommendations cont.● Further studies

– Direct Impacts on corals (snorkeller, Diver, water quality, boats)

– Continued monitoring– Enhanced coral survey– Shark and Turtle

populations– Enhanced Tourist

motivations

● Improved waste management

– Sewage treatment– Rubbish collection– Recycling potential

● Creation of village based artificial reef

– Educate locals– Local involvement– New snorkel site

Page 24: Blue Temple Conservation - Annual Report 2014

Any Questions?

Thanks for l istening


Recommended