Board of Veterans' Appeals Decisions Search · PDF fileCitation NR: 9741662 Decision Date:...

http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/va_search.jsp?CLF=1&SQ=NWP%3Awww.va.gov%2Fvetapp&SN=Board+of+Veterans%27+Appeals+Decisions&VC=bva&FGG=0&DURL=0&ST=Adv&QT=hidradenitis&SS=Title&RPP=100&RS=1

Board of Veterans' Appeals Decisions Search Results

Search Term: hidradenitis Found 369 documents out of 413871.Top 200 returned. Advanced Search • Search Tips

Results 1 - 100 displayed. 1 2 http://www.va.gov/vetapp05/files1/0505557.txt - 4kb90% Citation Nr: 0505557 Decision Date: 02/28/05 Archive Date: 03/04/05 DOCKETNO. See The Veterans Benefits Act of 2003, Pub. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (2004).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files3/0426099.txt - 30kb89% 93-13 467 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Newark, New Jersey THE ISSUE 1. Entitlement to anevaluation in excess of 10 percent for dermatofibrosarcoma, and residuals thereof,prior to September 14, 1999. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5103, 5103A, 5107 (West2002); 38 C.F.R. § 4.118, Diagnostic Code 7801 (effective through August 29,2002). 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(b)(1) (2003);Quartuccio v. Principi, 16 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0335411.txt - 46kb87% Citation Nr: 0335411 Decision Date: 12/17/03 Archive Date: 12/24/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1112, 1113, 1117, 1131 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§3.102, 3.303, 3.307, 3.309, 3.310, 3.317 (2003). 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West2002); 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(a) (2003); see Wilson v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0334054.txt - 49kb94% Citation Nr: 0334054 Decision Date: 12/05/03 Archive Date: 12/15/03 DOCKET

NO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 4.118, Diagnostic Codes 7801,7804, 7805, 7806 (2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.7, 4.118, Diagnostic Codes7801, 7804, 7805, 7806, 7820 (2003). 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103A (West 2002); 38C.F.R. § 3.159(c) (2003).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0332970.txt - 7kb91% Citation Nr: 0332970 Decision Date: 11/25/03 Archive Date: 12/10/03 DOCKETNO. On May 1, 2003, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,in Disabled American Veterans v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs, No. 38 C.F.R. §4.2 (2003); see also Stegall v. West, 11 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0332185.txt - 6kb89% Citation Nr: 0332185 Decision Date: 11/19/03 Archive Date: 11/25/03 DOCKETNO. This case comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) from a ratingdecision rendered in August 2000 by the Nashville, Tennessee, Regional Office(RO) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). 4645, 4658 (1994), 38U.S.C.A. § 5101 (West 2002) (Historical and Statutory Notes).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0331170.txt - 14kb89% Citation Nr: 0331170 Decision Date: 11/12/03 Archive Date: 11/17/03 DOCKETNO. Send this motion to the address above for the Director, Management andAdministration, at the Board. Send such a motion to the address above for theOffice of the Senior Deputy Vice Chairman at the Board.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0329806.txt - 17kb89% Citation Nr: 0329806 Decision Date: 10/30/03 Archive Date: 11/05/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321, 3.340, 3.341, 4.16(2003). Send such a motion to the address above for the Office of the SeniorDeputy Vice Chairman at the Board.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0328560.txt - 35kb94% 00-22 503A ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Cleveland, Ohio THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to a rating inexcess of 30 percent for acne vulgaris and hidradenitis suppurativa for the periodJuly 31, 2000 through August 29, 2002. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 2002); 38C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.7, 4.10, 4.118, Diagnostic Code 7899-7806 (2002). 38U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.7, 4.10, 4.118,Diagnostic Code 7899-7806 (2002 and .

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0328501.txt - 25kb89% Citation Nr: 0328501 Decision Date: 10/22/03 Archive Date: 11/03/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1131, 5103, 5103A, 5107 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§3.102, 3.303 (2002). Send such a motion to the address above for the Office of theSenior Deputy Vice Chairman at the Board.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0328348.txt - 37kb87% Citation Nr: 0328348 Decision Date: 10/21/03 Archive Date: 10/28/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1112, 1113, 1131, 1137, 5103, 5103A, 5107 (West2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.156(a), 3.303, 3.307, 3.309 (2003); 67 Fed. Forexample, a May 2003 radiology report shows minimal anterior lipping of C5 andC6 with minimal narrowing of the C5-6 intervertebral disk space.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0327849.txt - 10kb90% Citation Nr: 0327849 Decision Date: 10/16/03 Archive Date: 10/28/03 DOCKETNO. See 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.20 and 4.27. 4645, 4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101(West 2002) (Historical and Statutory Notes).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files3/0421729.txt - 3kb91% Citation Nr: 0421729 Decision Date: 08/09/04 Archive Date: 08/17/04 DOCKETNO. See The Veterans Benefits Act of 2003, Pub. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (2003).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0325542.txt - 6kb91% Citation Nr: 0325542 Decision Date: 09/29/03 Archive Date: 10/03/03 DOCKETNO. 90-02 526 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in No. 4645, 4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101 (West 2002)(Historical and Statutory Notes).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files3/0421576.txt - 21kb95% Citation Nr: 0421576 Decision Date: 08/06/04 Archive Date: 08/09/04 DOCKETNO. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5100, 5102, 5103, 5103A, 5107, 5126 (West 2002); 38C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.156, 3.159, and 3.326 (2003). 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5102, 5103, and5103A (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(b) (2003).

highlighted

http://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files2/0418567.txt - 19kb94% Citation Nr: 0418567 Decision Date: 07/13/04 Archive Date: 07/27/04 DOCKETNO. 03-00 559 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Denver, Colorado THE ISSUE Entitlement to a rating in excessof 10 percent for hidradenitis suppurativa with folliculitis. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155,5107 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321, 4.7, 4.71a; 4.118, Diagnostic Code (Code)7806 (effective prior to August 30, 2002).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0321543.txt - 13kb89% Citation Nr: 0321543 Decision Date: 08/27/03 Archive Date: 09/02/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5103A, 5107 (West 1991 & Supp. 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§3.102, 3.156(a), 3.159, 3.326(a), 3.303, 3.304 (2002).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0321540.txt - 44kb92% See Veterans and Agent Orange: Update 1996; Veterans and Agent Orange,Update 1998; Veterans and Agent Orange: Herbicide/Dioxin Exposure and Type 2Diabetes (2000); and Veterans and Agent Orange, Update 2000. Thedetermination of whether there is clear and unmistakable evidence that a defect,infirmity, or disorder existed prior to service should be based on "thoroughanalysis of the evidentiary showing and careful correlation of all material facts,with due regard to accepted medical .

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files2/0416952.txt - 43kb87% Citation Nr: 0416952 Decision Date: 06/28/04 Archive Date: 07/13/04 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 20.202, 20.204(2003). 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5110, 7105 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.155, 3.157, 3.158,3.400(o)(2) (2003).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files5/9742827.txt - 4kb94% Citation NR: 9742827 Decision Date: 12/31/97 Archive Date: 01/02/98 DOCKETNO. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1996). - 2 -

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files5/9742269.txt - 28kb89% DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. (20 percent under code 5257; 10 percentunder code 5010) 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107(b) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 4.7,Part 4, Diagnostic Codes 5010- 5257 (1996). The General Counsel opinion stated

that [w]hen a knee disorder is already rated under [Diagnostic Code] 5257, theveteran must also have limitation of motion under [Diagnostic Code] 5260 or[Diagnostic Code] 5261 in order to .

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0320042.txt - 5kb90% Citation Nr: 0320042 Decision Date: 08/13/03 Archive Date: 08/25/03 DOCKETNO. See 38 C.F.R. § 19.9(a)(2) (2002). 4645, 4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101(West 2002) (Historical and Statutory Notes).


highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0319737.txt - 19kb88% Citation Nr: 0319737 Decision Date: 08/11/03 Archive Date: 08/25/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1131, 5107 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 3.303 (2002).REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION VCAA TheVeterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA), Pub.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files5/9741662.txt - 8kb96% Citation NR: 9741662 Decision Date: 12/17/97 Archive Date: 12/19/97 DOCKETNO. 95-33 856 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in No. 4645, 4658 (1994) and 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101 (West 1991and Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0318907.txt - 10kb89% Citation Nr: 0318907 Decision Date: 08/04/03 Archive Date: 08/13/03 DOCKETNO. 2. Entitlement to dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC) under theprovisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 (West 2002). 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1112, 1113,1131, 1137, 1310 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303, 3.307, 3.309, 3.312(a) (2002).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files2/0414510.txt - 35kb94% 98-09 223 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Cleveland, Ohio THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to an evaluationin excess of 10 percent for hidradenitis suppurativa for the period prior to August

30, 2002. This appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA or Board) arisesfrom a rating decision in February 1998 by the Cleveland, Ohio, Regional Office(RO) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5103,5103A, 5107 (West 2002); 38 C.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files2/0412878.txt - 45kb88% Citation Nr: 0412878 Decision Date: 05/18/04 Archive Date: 05/25/04 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5110(b)(2) (West 1991); see 38 C.F.R. § 3.400(o)(2),3.155(a)(1999); Quarles v. Derwinski, 3 Vet. Send such a motion to the addressabove for the Office of the Senior Deputy Vice Chairman at the Board.


highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0316595.txt - 13kb93% Citation Nr: 0316595 Decision Date: 07/18/03 Archive Date: 07/22/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5100, 5102, 5103, 5103A, 5106, 5107, 5126 (West 2002); cf.38 U.S.C.A. § 5103(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(b) (2002); Quartuccio v.Principi, 16 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files4/9738327.txt - 13kb98% Citation NR: 9738327 Decision Date: 11/17/97 Archive Date: 12/02/97 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a). 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(b); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files2/0411769.txt - 28kb88% Citation Nr: 0411769 Decision Date: 05/05/04 Archive Date: 05/14/04 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1131, 1153 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303, 3.306 (2003).Send such a motion to the address above for the Office of the Senior Deputy ViceChairman at the Board.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files2/0411575.txt - 53kb88% Private medical records from November 1982 to September 1987 revealedcomplaints of a skin rash on his neck, a rash on his forehead, and tinea cruris onhis groin. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5100, 5102, 5103, 5103A and 5107 (West 2002); 38

C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.156(a), 3.159 and 3.326(a) (2003). 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103(a) and(b) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(b) (2003); Quartuccio v. Principi, 16 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files4/9837529.txt - 17kb97% DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38C.F.R. §§ 4.7, 4.20, 4.118, Diagnostic Code 7806 (1998). DEREK R. BROWNMember, Board of Veterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under38 U.S.C.A. § 7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files4/9837244.txt - 47kb87% 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321, 4.1-4.3, 4.7, 4.71a,Diagnostic Code 5284 (1998). 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R.§§ 3.321, 4.1- 4.3, 4.7, 4.124a, Diagnostic Code 8599-8519 (1998). 38 U.S.C.A.§§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321, 4.1-4.3, 4.7, 4.132, DiagnosticCode 9411 (1996).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0314610.txt - 17kb97% Citation Nr: 0314610 Decision Date: 07/02/03 Archive Date: 07/10/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1131 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 3.303 (2002). 38 U.S.C.A. §§5103, 5103A; 38 C.F.R. § 3.159.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files4/9636860.txt - 53kb87% DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2, 4.10, 4.114, Diagnostic Code 7336 (1995). 38 U.S.C.A. §§1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2, 4.10, 4.40, 4.45, 4.59, DiagnosticCode 5010-5260 (1995).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files4/9736706.txt - 13kb96% Citation NR: 9736706 Decision Date: 10/31/97 Archive Date: 11/05/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5107 (West1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.303 (1996).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0314425.txt - 11kb97%

Citation Nr: 0314425 Decision Date: 07/01/03 Archive Date: 07/10/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.20, 4.118, Diagnostic Code7806 (2002); 67 Fed.Reg. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(b); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1Vet.App.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files4/9636679.txt - 27kb89% Citation NR: 9636679 Decision Date: 12/27/96 Archive Date: 01/02/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. Applying the Courts instruction to theinstant case, the Board again notes that the veterans claim for service connectionfor a liver disorder was denied by the Board in July 1975.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files4/9636507.txt - 31kb95% 93-09 776 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Buffalo, New York THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to an earliereffective date prior to January 2, 1991, for the assignment of separate evaluationsfor residuals of a left parotid tumor resection with scar, facial asymmetry, andright parotid tumor; for a neurologic deficit residual to a left parotid tumorresection; and for cystic acne vulgaris with hidradenitis. Analyses (a.) Entitlementto an earlier .

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files4/9636183.txt - 4kb90% Citation NR: 9636183 Decision Date: 12/23/96 Archive Date: 01/02/97 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (West 1991). BETTINA S. CALLAWAY Member,Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals AdministrativeProcedures Improvement Act, Pub.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files4/9636339.txt - 34kb88% Citation NR: 9636339 Decision Date: 12/24/96 Archive Date: 01/02/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5107(a), 5108, 7105(West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.104(a), 3.156(a), 3.310(a), 20.302 (1995).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files4/9936216.txt - 23kb88% 2. Entitlement to compensation benefits for ulcerative colitis or Crohn's diseasepursuant to the criteria of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.4005(c) (1988); 38 C.F.R. § 19.192 (1989); (38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(c) (West 1991 &Supp. VA outpatient records from January to November 1996 noted treatment for

Crohn's disease status-post ileostomy and total abdominal colectomy withpersistent perineal drainage.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files4/9736199.txt - 13kb88% Citation NR: 9736199 Decision Date: 10/28/97 Archive Date: 11/04/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. U. R. POWELL Member, Board ofVeterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. §7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files4/9735970.txt - 13kb94% Citation NR: 9735970 Decision Date: 10/24/97 Archive Date: 10/28/97 DOCKETNO. 2. Entitlement to an increased (compensable) disability evaluation forfurunculosis (abscess) of the scrotal area. In evaluating the veterans claim for anincreased disability evaluation for the veterans service-connected low backdisorder, consideration should be given to the issue of entitlement to an extra-schedular evaluation under 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(2).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files4/9635972.txt - 21kb92% Citation NR: 9635972 Decision Date: 12/18/96 Archive Date: 12/24/96 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155; 38 C.F.R. § 4.31,4.118 Code 7804 REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS ANDCONCLUSIONS I.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0313301.txt - 7kb91% Citation Nr: 0313301 Decision Date: 06/19/03 Archive Date: 06/24/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5102 and 5103 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(b) (2002); seeQuartuccio v. Principi, 16 Vet. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5102, 5103 and 5103A (West2002); 38 C.F.R. § 3.159 (2002).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files4/9735628.txt - 16kb88% Citation NR: 9735628 Decision Date: 10/22/97 Archive Date: 10/28/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. H. N. SCHWARTZ Member, Boardof Veterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. §7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0312896.txt - 16kb88% Citation Nr: 0312896 Decision Date: 06/16/03 Archive Date: 06/24/03 DOCKETNO. 02-05 219 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in No. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. All relevant evidence necessaryfor an equitable disposition of the matter on appeal has been obtained by VA.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files4/9835079.txt - 44kb87% Citation Nr: 9835079 Decision Date: 11/27/98 Archive Date: 12/01/98 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. REASONS AND BASES FORFINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS I. Entitlement to an Increased Rating forChronic Dermatitis, Currently Evaluated as 30 Percent Disabling.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files4/9835077.txt - 16kb88% Citation Nr: 9835077 Decision Date: 11/27/98 Archive Date: 12/01/98 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. J.F. GOUGH Member, Board ofVeterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. §7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files04/0216445.txt - 23kb91% Citation Nr: 0216445 Decision Date: 11/15/02 Archive Date: 11/25/02 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1-4.16, 4.20, 4.27, 4.118,Diagnostic Code 7899-7806 (2002). 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R.§§ 4.1-4.16, 4.125- 4.130, Diagnostic Code 9411 (2002).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0312317.txt - 38kb93% Citation Nr: 0312317 Decision Date: 06/09/03 Archive Date: 06/16/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 4.71a, Diagnostic Code 5271(2002). See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5100, 5102, 5103, 5103A, and 5107 (West Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files4/9834157.txt - 13kb97% 2. Entitlement to a compensable evaluation for inguinal suppurative hidradenitiswith scars from March 23, 1993, to July 12, 1994. 3. Entitlement to an evaluationgreater than 10 percent for inguinal suppurative hidradenitis with scars from July12, 1994. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the

provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files4/9733870.txt - 5kb96% Citation NR: 9733870 Decision Date: 10/03/97 Archive Date: 10/09/97 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.103(a) (1996). 4645, 4658(1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101 (West Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files4/9933748.txt - 9kb89% Citation Nr: 9933748 Decision Date: 12/02/99 Archive Date: 12/10/99 DOCKETNO. 4645, 4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101 (West Supp. Thomas J. DannaherMember, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991 &Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp00/files4/0033678.txt - 8kb90% Citation Nr: 0033678 Decision Date: 12/27/00 Archive Date: 01/03/01 DOCKETNO. 4645, 4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101 (West Supp. J. E. Day Veterans LawJudge Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files4/9833599.txt - 11kb94% Citation Nr: 9833599 Decision Date: 11/13/98 Archive Date: 11/17/98 DOCKETNO. 97-27 777 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in No. 4645, 4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101 (West Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files03/0214996.txt - 15kb89% Citation Nr: 0214996 Decision Date: 10/24/02 Archive Date: 11/01/02 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5103A, 5107 (West 1991 & Supp. The physicalexamination found tenderness of the right paraspinous musculature, as well asmild tenderness to palpation on the left.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp00/files4/0033453.txt - 20kb93% Citation Nr: 0033453 Decision Date: 12/22/00 Archive Date: 01/03/01 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321(b)(1), 4.1-4.14,4.118, Diagnostic Code 7806 (2000). 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1131 (West 1991); 38C.F.R. § 3.303 (2000).

highlighted

http://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files4/9833391.txt - 16kb92% Citation Nr: 9833391 Decision Date: 11/10/98 Archive Date: 11/17/98 DOCKETNO. 3. Entitlement to a disability evaluation in excess of 30 percent for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The veteran hereby is advised that the purposeof this REMAND is to further develop the record and to afford him due process oflaw and that, consequently, no action is required of him unless and until hereceives further notice from VA.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files4/9832823.txt - 37kb91% DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. Eczema: >With ulceration or extensiveexfoliation or crusting, and systemic or nervous manifestations, or exceptionallyrepugnant; rate as 50 percent disabling. N. R. ROBIN Member, Board of Veterans'Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7266 (West1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files4/9732759.txt - 26kb91% Citation NR: 9732759 Decision Date: 09/25/97 Archive Date: 10/01/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (West 1991);38 C.F.R. §§ 3.103, 3.159 (1996).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files03/0214030.txt - 9kb89% Citation Nr: 0214030 Decision Date: 10/09/02 Archive Date: 10/17/02 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5108, 7105 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.156 (2001). 976(2001)); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.307(a)(6), 3.309(e).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp00/files4/0032488.txt - 39kb87% 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 4.118, Diagnostic Code7806 (2000); Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155,5107; 38 C.F.R. § 4.118, Diagnostic Code 7800 (2000); Veterans ClaimsAssistance Act of 2000, Pub. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321,4.40, 4.59, 4.71a, Diagnostic Code 5284 (2000); Veterans Claims Assistance Actof 2000, Pub.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files4/9632578.txt - 7kb92% Citation NR: 9632578 Decision Date: 11/20/96 Archive Date: 12/02/96 DOCKET

NO. 4. Entitlement to a rating in excess of 50 percent for service-connected cysticacne. RIPLEY P. SCHOENBERGER Acting Member, Board of Veterans' AppealsThe Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act,Pub.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files03/0213807.txt - 66kb88% Citation Nr: 0213807 Decision Date: 10/07/02 Archive Date: 10/10/02 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1110 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303, 3.307, 3.309, 3.310(2001). 38 U.S.C.A. § 1110 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303, 3.307, 3.309 (2001).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files03/0213803.txt - 16kb92% Citation Nr: 0213803 Decision Date: 10/07/02 Archive Date: 10/10/02 DOCKETNO. and not the result of such veteran's own willful misconduct, and such injuryor aggravation results in additional disability . On physical examination, chronicdrainage of left axilla with multiple sinus and palpable lymph nodes at the leftaxilla, firm and movable.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files4/9832140.txt - 19kb97% Citation Nr: 9832140 Decision Date: 10/29/98 Archive Date: 11/03/98 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. E. M. KRENZER Member, Board ofVeterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. §7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files4/9732079.txt - 36kb93% Citation NR: 9732079 Decision Date: 09/22/97 Archive Date: 09/29/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. G.H. SHUFELT Member, Board ofVeterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. §7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files4/9632082.txt - 20kb88% DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38C.F.R. §§ 3.321, 4.1, 4.2, 4.7, 4.40, 4.41, 4.45, 4.59, 4.71, 4.71a, Diagnostic Code(DC) 7800 (1995). 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321,4.1, 4.2, 4.7, 4.40, 4.41, 4.45, 4.59, 4.71, 4.71a, DCs 7819-7806 (1995).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0309529.txt - 5kb91% Citation Nr: 0309529 Decision Date: 05/21/03 Archive Date: 05/27/03 DOCKETNO. This appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) arises from a ratingdecision in August 1999 by the St. Louis, Missouri, Regional Office (RO) of theDepartment of Veterans Affairs (VA). See Veterans Claims Assistance Act of2000, 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5103, 5103A (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.156(a),3.159, and 3.326(a) (2002).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0309526.txt - 6kb93% Citation Nr: 0309526 Decision Date: 05/21/03 Archive Date: 05/27/03 DOCKETNO. See Disabled American Veterans v. Sec'y of Veterans Affairs, Nos. 4645,4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101 (West 2002) (Historical and Statutory Notes).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files4/9931700.txt - 13kb91% Citation Nr: 9931700 Decision Date: 11/09/99 Archive Date: 11/19/99 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5108, 7105 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.156 (1999). 38U.S.C.A. § 1110 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.303 (1999).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files4/9831696.txt - 17kb96% Citation Nr: 9831696 Decision Date: 10/26/98 Archive Date: 11/02/98 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. V. L. Jordan Member, Board ofVeterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. §7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files4/9631590.txt - 8kb89% Citation NR: 9631590 Decision Date: 11/07/96 Archive Date: 11/14/96 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. JACK W. BLASINGAME Member,Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals AdministrativeProcedures Improvement Act, Pub.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files03/0212817.txt - 35kb88% 38 U.S.C. § 4005(c) (1970); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.104, 19.118, 19.153 (1975); currently38 U.S.C.A. § 7105 (West 1991 & Supp. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 1112(a) (West 1991);38 C.F.R. §§ 3.307(a), 3.309(a) (2001). See 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105 (West 1991); see

also 38 C.F.R. § 19.129(a) (1990), and 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.160(d) and 20.302(a)(2001).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files4/9931208.txt - 16kb91% Citation Nr: 9931208 Decision Date: 11/02/99 Archive Date: 11/17/99 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1110 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.303 (1999). 38 U.S.C.A. §1116 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.307(a)(6) (1999).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files4/9931200.txt - 5kb95% Citation Nr: 9931200 Decision Date: 11/02/99 Archive Date: 11/17/99 DOCKETNO. Notify the veteran of the time limit within which she must respond in order toperfect an appeal of this claim to the Board. P.M. DILORENZO Acting Member,Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0308479.txt - 23kb90% This case comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) by means of anAugust 2000 rating decision rendered by the New Orleans, Louisiana, RegionalOffice (RO) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155,5107 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 4.88b, Diagnostic Code 6351 (2002). 38 U.S.C.A.§§ 5100-5107 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.156(a), 3.159 and 3.326(a)(2002).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files4/9730514.txt - 8kb94% Citation NR: 9730514 Decision Date: 09/04/97 Archive Date: 09/11/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1131 (West1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(a) (1996).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp00/files4/0030390.txt - 7kb96% Citation Nr: 0030390 Decision Date: 11/21/00 Archive Date: 12/01/00 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155 (West 1991), 5103A (Public Law 106-475, VeteransClaims Assistance Act of 2000 (Nov. 9, 2000)); 38 C.F.R. § 4.118, DiagnosticCode 7806 (1999). 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103A (Public Law 106-475, Veterans ClaimsAssistance Act of 2000 (Nov. 9, 2000)).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0308212.txt - 17kb92%

Citation Nr: 0308212 Decision Date: 04/30/03 Archive Date: 05/06/03 DOCKETNO. 99-15 592 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Buffalo, New York THE ISSUE Entitlement to an initialcompensable rating for hidradenitis suppurativa as of December 1, 1993. 38U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107(b) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.7, 4.118, Diagnostic Code(DC) 7806 (in effect prior to August 30, 2002), 67 Fed.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files03/0211773.txt - 21kb90% Citation Nr: 0211773 Decision Date: 09/11/02 Archive Date: 09/19/02 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1112, 1116, 5102, 5103, 5103A, and 5107 (West 1991& Supp. 38 C.F.R. § 3.307(a)(6)(iii) and the "Veterans Education and BenefitsExpansion Act of 2001," Pub L. No.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files4/9730288.txt - 10kb89% Citation Nr: 9730288 Decision Date: 01/24/97 Archive Date: 09/11/97 BOARDOF VETERANS' APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRSWASHINGTON, DC 20420 DOCKET NO. DECISION OF THE BOARD TheBoard, in accordance with the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. 7104 (West 1991 &Supp. M. W. GREENSTREET Acting Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals TheBoard of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp00/files4/0030106.txt - 30kb92% 4. Entitlement to a rating in excess of 10 percent for right knee patellofemoralpain syndrome, on and after March 25, 1999. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1-4.14, 4.71a, Diagnostic Code 5258 (2000). 38 U.S.C.A.§§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1-4.14, 4.40, 4.59, 4.71a, DiagnosticCode 5257 (2000).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0307835.txt - 38kb90% 2. Entitlement to a rating in excess of 10 percent for scarring of the head, face,and neck. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.7, 4.20, 4.118Diagnostic Codes (DCs) 7813, 7806 (prior to and subsequent to Aug. 30, 2002).38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107; 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.7, 4.118, DC 7800 (prior to andsubsequent to Aug. 30, 2002).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files3/9829796.txt - 44kb88% Citation Nr: 9829796 Decision Date: 10/06/98 Archive Date: 10/13/98 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions

of 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. L. W. TOBIN Member, Board ofVeterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. §7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files/0403695.txt - 12kb90% Citation Nr: 0403695 Decision Date: 02/09/04 Archive Date: 02/23/04 DOCKETNO. 00-07 616 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs(VA) Regional Office (RO) in Louisville, Kentucky THE ISSUE Entitlement to aninitial compensable rating for the service- connected limitation of motion of theleft shoulder. 4645, 4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101 (West 2002) (Historical andStatutory Notes).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0307535.txt - 13kb88% Citation Nr: 0307535 Decision Date: 04/21/03 Archive Date: 04/30/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7111(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 20.1403, 20.1404(b)(2002). 38 U.S.C.A. § 7111(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 20.1400-20.1411(2002).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0307514.txt - 22kb90% Citation Nr: 0307514 Decision Date: 04/21/03 Archive Date: 04/30/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5103(a), 5103A, 5110 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.155,3.157, 3.400, 4.118, Diagnostic Codes (DCs) 7806, 7819. See 38 U.S.C.A. §5103(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 3.159 (2002); Quartuccio v. Principi, 16 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files03/0210884.txt - 21kb90% Citation Nr: 0210884 Decision Date: 08/29/02 Archive Date: 09/05/02 DOCKETNO. 107-_ (H.R. 1291) (Dec. 27, 2001); 38 U.S.C. § 1116(a)(3) (2002). 38 U.S.C.§ 1116(a); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.307(a)(6), 3.309(e).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files3/9929283.txt - 18kb89% Citation Nr: 9929283 Decision Date: 10/12/99 Archive Date: 10/21/99 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1112, 1113, 1131, 1137, 5107 (West 1991 & Supp. 38U.S.C.A. § 1131 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303, 3.304 (1998).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9729144.txt - 21kb89% Citation NR: 9729144 Decision Date: 08/22/97 Archive Date: 08/29/97 DOCKET

NO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board of Veterans Appeals (Board), inaccordance with the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. Inaccordance with 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2, 4.41, 4.42 (1996) and Schafrath v.Derwinski, 1 Vet.App.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files03/0210258.txt - 74kb88% Citation Nr: 0210258 Decision Date: 08/22/02 Archive Date: 08/29/02 DOCKETNO. 95-23 741 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs(VA) Regional Office (RO) in No. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1116; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.307(a)(6),3.309(e).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files/0402679.txt - 5kb90% Citation Nr: 0402679 Decision Date: 01/30/04 Archive Date: 02/05/04 DOCKETNO. See The Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 1994, Pub. 4645, 4658(1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101 (West 2002) (Historical and Statutory Notes).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files3/9828752.txt - 15kb94% DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38C.F.R. §§ 4.1-4.14, 4.118, Diagnostic Codes 7800, 7806 (1998). R. F. WILLIAMSMember, Board of Veterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under38 U.S.C.A. § 7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files3/9828695.txt - 11kb90% Citation Nr: 9828695 Decision Date: 09/25/98 Archive Date: 10/01/98 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 1998); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.7, 4.10,4.118 including Diagnostic Codes 7803, 7804, 7805, 7806 (1998).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0306325.txt - 24kb92% Citation Nr: 0306325 Decision Date: 04/01/03 Archive Date: 04/10/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5103, 5103A, 5107(a), 7104 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §3.159 (2002); and § 4.119, Codes 7803, 7804, 7805, 7806 (as in effect prior toAug. 30, 2002 and on/after that date). 38 C.F.R. § 4.119, Code 7806 (as in effectprior to Aug. 30, 2002).

highlighted Results 1 - 100 displayed.

1 2

Return to Top

VA Home Page / Search / Site Map / Facilities Locator / DisclaimerPrivacy & Security Statement / Freedom of Information Act / Contact the VA

Reviewed/Updated: 08/04/2003

http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/va_search.jsp?CLF=1&SQ=NWP%3Awww.va.gov%2Fvetapp&SN=Board+of+Veterans%27+Appeals+Decisions&VC=bva&FGG=0&DURL=0&ST=Adv&QT=hidradenitis&SS=Title&RPP=100&RS=101

Board of Veterans' Appeals Decisions Search Results

Search Term: hidradenitis Found 369 documents out of 413871.Top 200 returned. Advanced Search • Search Tips

Results 101 - 200 displayed. 1 2 http://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files3/9828391.txt - 23kb95% Citation Nr: 9828391 Decision Date: 09/23/98 Archive Date: 10/01/98 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. MILO H. HAWLEY Acting Member,Board of Veterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38U.S.C.A. § 7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp92/files3/9228725.txt - 8kb

97% 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.103(a), 3.159 (1991). 78(1990); Littke v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 127 (1991); and Payne v. Derwinski, 1Vet.App.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9728098.txt - 15kb88% Citation NR: 9728098 Decision Date: 08/13/97 Archive Date: 08/19/97 DOCKETNO. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.358(b)(1) (1996). MICHAEL D. LYON Member, Board ofVeterans' Appeals 38 U.S.C.A. § 7102 (West Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files3/9928090.txt - 25kb91% REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Veterans of Foreign Wars of theUnited States ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Phillip L. Krejci, AssociateCounsel INTRODUCTION The veteran had active service from February 1964 toFebruary 1966. The scrotal incision drained briefly but the drain was eventuallyremoved, his postoperative course was unremarkable, and he was discharged onApril 1. A July VA audiology examination revealed bilateral mild-to- moderatesensorineural hearing loss and good-to-excellent.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp00/files3/0027844.txt - 5kb92% Citation Nr: 0027844 Decision Date: 10/20/00 Archive Date: 10/26/00 DOCKETNO. 4645, 4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101 (West Supp. THOMAS J.DANNAHER Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A.§ 7252 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0305590.txt - 16kb88% Citation Nr: 0305590 Decision Date: 03/25/03 Archive Date: 04/03/03 DOCKETNO. 02-04 955 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Chicago, Illinois THE ISSUE Propriety of the assignment of a30 percent evaluation for chronic furunculosis of the buttocks and back. 38U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107(b) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.3, 4.7, 4.118, DiagnosticCode 7806 (pre-August 30, 2002).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp00/files3/0027754.txt - 53kb94% 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.20, 4.118, DiagnosticCode 7806 (1999). 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.340, 3.341,4.1, 4.3, 4.16 (1999). A VA examination in September 1987 found chronicinflammatory changes and deep seated cysts in the groin and axillary area.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0305255.txt - 7kb93% Citation Nr: 0305255 Decision Date: 03/20/03 Archive Date: 04/03/03 DOCKETNO. 98-09 223 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Cleveland, Ohio THE ISSUE Entitlement to an increased ratingfor hidradenitis suppurativa of the buttocks and groin, currently evaluated as 10percent disabling. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (2002).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp00/files3/0027343.txt - 6kb93% Citation Nr: 0027343 Decision Date: 10/16/00 Archive Date: 10/26/00 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (West 1991). DEREK R. BROWN Veterans LawJudge Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0305096.txt - 28kb88% 90-02 526 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)Regional Office (RO) in No. 2. Entitlement to compensation pursuant to theprovisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for claimed cerebellar degeneration andvestibular dysfunction. In December 1991, the Court vacated the August 1990decision by the Board and remanded the case for development and readjudicationconsistent with a Motion filed by VA.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp92/files3/9227647.txt - 8kb89% 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.103(a) (1991). Hyder v.Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 221 (1991).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp00/files3/0027159.txt - 16kb89% Citation Nr: 0027159 Decision Date: 10/13/00 Archive Date: 10/19/00 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1116; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.307(a)(6), 3.309(e); Chase v. West, 13Vet.App. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.103, 3.159; Proscelle v.Derwinski, 2 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files/0400922.txt - 18kb88% Citation Nr: 0400922 Decision Date: 01/12/04 Archive Date: 01/22/04 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1110 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303, 3.307, 3.309 (2002); 68Fed. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5100, 5102, 5103, 5103A, 5107, and 5126 (West 2002);38 C.F.R. § 3.102, 3.156, 3.159, and 3.326 (2002).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files/0400872.txt - 34kb87% Citation Nr: 0400872 Decision Date: 01/12/04 Archive Date: 01/22/04 DOCKETNO. 2096 (2000) (codified at 38 U.S.C. § 5100, 5102, 5103, 5103A, 5107), whichapplies to all pending claims for VA benefits, and which provides that the VAshall make reasonable efforts to assist a claimant in obtaining evidence necessaryto substantiate his or her claim for benefits under the laws administered by theVA. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(b) (2002); Quartucciov. Principi, 16 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9726843.txt - 15kb97% DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board of Veterans Appeals (Board), inaccordance with the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp.FINDINGS OF FACT 1. All the evidence necessary for an equitable disposition ofthe veterans claim has been obtained by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107; 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2, 4.7, 4.10, 4.20, 4.118,Diagnostic Code 7806.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files3/9926774.txt - 4kb90% Citation Nr: 9926774 Decision Date: 09/17/99 Archive Date: 09/28/99 DOCKETNO. BRUCE KANNEE Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A.§ 7252 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1998).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9726773.txt - 36kb87% Citation NR: 9726773 Decision Date: 07/31/97 Archive Date: 08/06/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. A discharge diagnosis of anteriorcruciate ligament deficient knee, complex degenerative tear of the lateral anteriorand medial sections of the lateral meniscus, and peripheral tear of the mid andanterior portions of the medial meniscus.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0304545.txt - 19kb89% Citation Nr: 0304545 Decision Date: 03/12/03 Archive Date: 03/24/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321, 4.7, 4.118,Diagnostic Code 7806 (as in effect prior to, and after, August 30, 2002). scatteredover the buttocks and inner thighs, with a few similar lesions on the upper back aswell as several small pustules and residual scars on the nape of the neck.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files3/9926629.txt - 16kb89% Citation Nr: 9926629 Decision Date: 09/16/99 Archive Date: 09/28/99 DOCKETNO. 98-01 683 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Detroit, Michigan THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to an effectivedate prior to January 13, 1995, for a grant of service connection for chloracne. 2.Entitlement to an initial disability evaluation in excess of 30 percent for theveteran's chloracne.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files3/9926598.txt - 8kb93% Citation Nr: 9926598 Decision Date: 09/16/99 Archive Date: 09/28/99 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321(b)(1), 4.1,4.7, 4.14, 4.118, Diagnostic Code 7803 (1998). 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155; 38 C.F.R. §4.1.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files02/0208002.txt - 22kb89% Citation Nr: 0208002 Decision Date: 07/17/02 Archive Date: 07/19/02 DOCKETNO. 2. Service connection has been established for acne with associatedhidradenitis suppurativa, which has been treated with minocycline prescribed bythe VA. In fact both VA and private physicians have specifically indicated thatminocycline does not cause hepatitis C.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9726545.txt - 24kb96% Citation NR: 9726545 Decision Date: 07/31/97 Archive Date: 08/06/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1110 (West 1991); 38C.F.R. § 3.303 (1996); Rabideau v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0304253.txt - 25kb88% Citation Nr: 0304253 Decision Date: 03/10/03 Archive Date: 03/18/03 DOCKETNO. This letter and other letters from the VA provided notification to the claimantand to the claimant's representative of any information, and medical or layevidence, not previously submitted that is necessary to substantiate the claim; andnotice of which evidence, if any, the claimant is being expected to obtain andsubmit, and which evidence will be retrieved by VA. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103A(West 2002); 38 C.F.R. .


92% Citation Nr: 0026359 Decision Date: 09/29/00 Archive Date: 10/04/00 DOCKETNO. MILO H. HAWLEY Acting Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans' AppealsUnder 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1999).

http://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files3/9626361.txt - 19kb88% Citation NR: 9626361 Decision Date: 09/20/96 Archive Date: 09/26/96 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1131 (West1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303, 3.310 (1995); Rabideau v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files3/9926154.txt - 84kb95% Citation Nr: 9926154 Decision Date: 09/14/99 Archive Date: 09/21/99 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.7, 4.118, Diagnostic Code7806 (1998). 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1131 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303,3.304(a), (b), (c), 3.310(a) (1998).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9726016.txt - 30kb90% DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107(a) (West 1991);38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.321, Part 4, §§ 4.1, 4.2, 4.7, 4.10, 4.104, Code 7101 (1996).9. The RO is to readjudicate the increased evaluation issues and prepare a ratingaction addressing them, to include specific citations to and a discussion of theapplicability of 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0303821.txt - 38kb87% 00-10 208 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Huntington, West Virginia THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to ahigher initial evaluation in excess of 30 percent for post-traumatic stress disorder(PTSD). 2. Entitlement to an effective date earlier than May 28, 1999, forestablishment of service connection and eligibility for compensation for PTSD.Chronic post-traumatic stress disorder was diagnosed and the veteran's currentGAF was assessed as 52 and for .

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp95/files6/9526785.txt - 32kb88% 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321, 4.1-4.14, 4.71a,Diagnostic Code 5295 (1994). 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107(a) (West 1991); 38C.F.R. §§ 3.321, 14.1-4.14, 4.71a, Diagnostic Code 5271 (1994). 38 U.S.C.A. §§1155, 5107(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1- 4.14, 4.59, 4.71a, Diagnostic Code

5257 (1994).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp01/files03/0125769.txt - 19kb88% Citation Nr: 0125769 Decision Date: 11/02/01 Archive Date: 11/13/01 DOCKETNO. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, 1112, 1113, 1137 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.307,3.309 (2001). WARREN W. RICE, JR. Member, Board of Veterans' AppealsUnder 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0303576.txt - 30kb91% Citation Nr: 0303576 Decision Date: 03/03/03 Archive Date: 03/18/03 DOCKETNO. 95-27 671 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Muskogee, Oklahoma THE ISSUE Entitlement to an initialdisability evaluation in excess of 30 percent for scalp folliculitis, acne keloidalisnuchae, and hidradenitis suppurativa. In this case, the issue of an increasedevaluation for dermatitis stems from an initial grant of service connection and theassignment of a 30 .

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files3/9625801.txt - 23kb88% Citation NR: 9625801 Decision Date: 09/12/96 Archive Date: 09/15/96 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, 5107(a) (West1991); 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1112, 1113, 1116 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files02/0207105.txt - 9kb89% Citation Nr: 0207105 Decision Date: 07/01/02 Archive Date: 07/10/02 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5103A, 5107 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1110;38 C.F.R. § 3.303.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9725436.txt - 8kb94% Citation NR: 9725436 Decision Date: 07/23/97 Archive Date: 08/04/97 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (West 1991). 4645, 4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101(West Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0303078.txt - 26kb95% Citation Nr: 0303078 Decision Date: 02/21/03 Archive Date: 03/05/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1131, 5103A, 5107(b), 5108 (West 1991 & Supp. See

38 U.S.C.A. § 5108; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.104 (a), 3.156, 20.302, 20.1103.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp00/files3/0025158.txt - 10kb89% Citation Nr: 0025158 Decision Date: 09/21/00 Archive Date: 09/27/00 DOCKETNO. 98-07 158 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Los Angeles, California THE ISSUE Entitlement to acompensable rating for residuals of excision of cyst, right thigh. 38 U.S.C.A. §§1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2, 4.10, 4.118, Diagnostic Codes7803-7805 (2000).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files3/9825183.txt - 19kb88% Citation Nr: 9825183 Decision Date: 08/21/98 Archive Date: 07/27/01 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. JAMES L. MARCH Acting Member,Board of Veterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38U.S.C.A. § 7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0302884.txt - 13kb90% Citation Nr: 0302884 Decision Date: 02/13/03 Archive Date: 02/24/03 DOCKETNO. 2001); 38 C.F.R. § 3.156(a) (2001); 38 C.F.R. § 20.302, 20.1103 (2002). 38U.S.C.A. § 7105 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.104(a), 20.302, 20.1103.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files3/9925013.txt - 5kb90% Citation Nr: 9925013 Decision Date: 08/31/99 Archive Date: 09/08/99 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (West 1991). 136, 140 (1994); Murphy v. Derwinski,1 Vet.App.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp92/files3/9225285.txt - 13kb88% 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321(b)(1), 4.20, Part 4, Code 7806(1991). 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1). 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2; Schafrath v. Derwinski, 1Vet.App.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp01/files03/0124800.txt - 7kb93% Citation Nr: 0124800 Decision Date: 10/17/01 Archive Date: 10/23/01 DOCKETNO. 4645, 4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101 (West Supp. BETTINA S.CALLAWAY Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252

(West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp00/files3/0024767.txt - 23kb88% 97-27 258 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Jackson, Mississippi THE ISSUE Entitlement to compensationunder 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for the residuals of a right subcortical stroke. 38U.S.C.A. §§ 1151, 5107(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.358(a), 3.800 (1999).ORDER Entitlement to compensation benefits pursuant to 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 forthe residuals of the right subcortical stroke is granted ROBERT P. REGANMember, Board of Veterans' Appeals

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0302399.txt - 25kb88% Citation Nr: 0302399 Decision Date: 02/06/03 Archive Date: 02/19/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5103, 5103A, 5107(b), 5108 (West 1991 & Supp. See 38U.S.C.A. § 5108; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.104 (a), 3.156, 20.302, 20.1103.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files3/9624569.txt - 9kb94% Citation NR: 9624569 Decision Date: 08/30/96 Archive Date: 09/04/96 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (West1991); Murphy v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files3/9824391.txt - 21kb92% Citation Nr: 9824391 Decision Date: 08/12/98 Archive Date: 07/27/01 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. C. P. RUSSELL Member, Board ofVeterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. §7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files3/9824349.txt - 51kb87% DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board), inaccordance with the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp.FINDINGS OF FACT 1. All the evidence necessary for an equitable disposition ofthe veteran's claims for service connection for a lung disorder, a disabilitymanifested by obesity, a disability manifested by a rapid heart beat, chronicfatigue syndrome, a disability manifested by right-sided numbness, a skindisorder, a disability manifested by sore joints .

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp01/files03/0124290.txt - 10kb90% Citation Nr: 0124290 Decision Date: 10/09/01 Archive Date: 10/09/01 DOCKETNO. On November 9, 2000, the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA),Pub. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 4.1 (2001).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp92/files3/9224326.txt - 11kb95% 4. Entitlement to a separate, compensable evaluation for residuals of an injury andloss of tissue in Muscle Group XVII. In a recent case, Harris v. Derwinski, 1Vet.App. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.103(a) (1991).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files02/0205265.txt - 28kb95% Citation Nr: 0205265 Decision Date: 05/24/02 Archive Date: 06/03/02 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(b) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.102 (2001); VCAA § 4,114 Stat. With respect to the veteran's complaints of ear pain in 1996 and 1997, inthe case of Sanchez-Benitez v. West, 13 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0301638.txt - 31kb95% Citation Nr: 0301638 Decision Date: 01/28/03 Archive Date: 02/04/03 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.7, 4.118,Diagnostic Codes 7800, 7806 (2002); 67 Fed. 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2 (2002); Peytonv. Derwinski, 1 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp95/files5/9524757.txt - 9kb94% Decision Date: 11/28/95 Archive Date: 12/06/95 DOCKET NO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§1155, 5107, 7104 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 4.7, 4.20, 4.114 includingDiagnostic Codes 7332, 7335, 4.118 including Diagnostic Codes 7803, 7804, 7805(1994). STEPHEN L. WILKINS Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Boardof Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files3/9923712.txt - 17kb88% Citation Nr: 9923712 Decision Date: 08/21/99 Archive Date: 08/26/99 DOCKETNO. 95-19 549 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Oakland, California THE ISSUE Entitlement to a rating inexcess of 10 percent for sebaceous cysts. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155; 38 C.F.R. § 4.1.

highlighted

http://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files01/0204941.txt - 21kb95% Citation Nr: 0204941 Decision Date: 05/23/02 Archive Date: 06/03/02 DOCKETNO. Outpatient treatment notes from the VA Medical Center in Bakersfield,California show treatment for unrelated conditions from December 1998 to May1999. There is no evidence that this condition involves such disability that referralfor consideration of an extraschedular rating would be warranted under theprovisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp01/files03/0123367.txt - 25kb88% 00-19 590 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Muskogee, Oklahoma THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to an initialevaluation in excess of 30 percent for cystic acne. 2001); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.7,4.31, 4.40, 4.45, 4.59, 4.71a, Diagnostic Code 5257 (2000); 66 Fed. 38 U.S.C.A. §1154(b) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(d), (f) (2000); Gaines v. West, 11 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp95/files5/9524221.txt - 8kb96% Decision Date: 11/06/95 Archive Date: 11/05/95 DOCKET NO. 38 U.S.C.A. §5107(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.103(a) (1995). Littke v. Derwinski, 1Vet.App.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9723223.txt - 50kb88% DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1110, 1111, 1131, 1137,1153, 5107(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303(c), 3.306 (1996). .(b) Moremovement than normal (from flail joints, resections, nonunion of fracture,relaxation of ligaments, etc.) . . . (f) Pain on movement, disturbance of locomotion,interference with .

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9723174.txt - 6kb94% Citation NR: 9723174 Decision Date: 07/02/97 Archive Date: 07/15/97 DOCKETNO. 4645, 4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. § 5101 (West Supp. G. H. SHUFELTMember, Board of Veterans' Appeals 38 U.S.C.A. § 7102 (West Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp95/files5/9524125.txt - 26kb95% 38 U.S.C.A. § 5110(a), (b)(2) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.400(o)(1) (1994). 38U.S.C.A. § 5110(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.400(o)(1) (1994). NANCY I.PHILLIPS Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals

Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9723076.txt - 13kb89% Citation NR: 9723076 Decision Date: 07/01/97 Archive Date: 07/15/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1131, 5107(West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.303 (1996).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9723037.txt - 9kb95% Citation Nr: 9723037 Decision Date: 04/18/97 Archive Date: 09/11/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. 101(16), 1110, 1153 (West1991); 38 C.F.R. 3.303, 3.306 (1996).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files01/0204467.txt - 14kb89% Citation Nr: 0204467 Decision Date: 05/14/02 Archive Date: 05/17/02 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1310 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.312 (2001). 38 U.S.C.A. §1310; 38 C.F.R. § 3.312.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files01/0204180.txt - 17kb94% Citation Nr: 0204180 Decision Date: 05/07/02 Archive Date: 05/14/02 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, 1110, 1112, 1113, 1153, 5103, 5103A, 5107 (West1991 & Supp. 2096 (Nov. 9, 2000); see 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5103, 5103A (West Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp01/files03/0122668.txt - 18kb96% Citation Nr: 0122668 Decision Date: 09/18/01 Archive Date: 09/24/01 DOCKETNO. A VA examination from December 2000 showed complaints of pain andconstant drainage from the underarm skin disorder. The findings of the December2000 VA examination and outpatient psychotherapy treatment reports from June2000 to November 2000 show similar findings.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0300422.txt - 19kb96% Citation Nr: 0300422 Decision Date: 01/09/03 Archive Date: 01/28/03 DOCKETNO. 2. Entitlement to an effective date prior to February 24, 1997 for the grant ofa 50 percent evaluation for hidradenitis suppurativa. 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.1(p),3.155(a) (2002); see Servello v. Derwinski, 3 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files01/0204022.txt - 26kb89% Citation Nr: 0204022 Decision Date: 05/01/02 Archive Date: 05/14/02 DOCKETNO. 00-02 212A ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Wilmington, Delaware THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to aninitial rating in excess of 30 percent for a mood disorder. For purposes of thissection, the terms examination and reexamination include periods of hospitalobservation when required by VA.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files01/0204017.txt - 19kb94% Citation Nr: 0204017 Decision Date: 05/01/02 Archive Date: 05/14/02 DOCKETNO. 94-02 095 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Wilmington, Delaware THE ISSUE Entitlement to anincreased rating for hidradenitis suppurativa (formerly rated as recurrent cysts),evaluated as 50 percent disabling from September 15, 1993, to include the issue ofentitlement to an extraschedular rating under 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1). Forpurposes of this section, the terms .

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp03/files/0300307.txt - 53kb88% Citation Nr: 0300307 Decision Date: 01/08/03 Archive Date: 01/28/03 DOCKETNO. 2001); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.321, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.7, 4.10, 4.20, 4.40, 4.45,4.59, 4.71a, Diagnostic Codes Diagnostic Codes 5003-5024, 5256, 5257, 5258,5259, 5260, 5261 (2002); 66 Fed. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(b); 38 C.F.R. § 3.102;Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp95/files5/9523369.txt - 20kb91% 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1-4.14, 4.118, DiagnosticCode 7800 (1994). 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1-4.14, 4.125-4.132, Diagnostic Code 9405 (1994). WARREN W. RICE, JR.Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' AppealsAdministrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp01/files03/0122195.txt - 32kb93% Citation Nr: 0122195 Decision Date: 09/07/01 Archive Date: 09/12/01 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5107 (West 1991); Veterans Claims Assistance Act of2000, Pub. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 1116(a)(3) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(e)(2000).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp94/files3/9423365.txt - 12kb88% BVA9423365 BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS DEPARTMENT OFVETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20420 DOCKET NO. 38 U.S.C.A.5108, 7104, 7105 (West 1991); McGinnis v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. GARY L. GICKMember, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' AppealsAdministrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files3/9821978.txt - 10kb88% DECISION OF THE BOARD In accordance with the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. §7104 (West 1991 & Supp. In a VA progress note of January 1982, it was reportedthat the veteran had a blood pressure reading of 130/95. John E. Ormond, Jr.Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under38 U.S.C.A. § 7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files3/9921806.txt - 56kb87% Citation Nr: 9921806 Decision Date: 08/04/99 Archive Date: 08/12/99 DOCKETNO. Blood pressure was 132/82. The diastolic blood pressure readings in theservice medical records were all less than 90. § 3.311(b)(2). VA will considerunder the provisions of § 3.311 a claim based on a disease other than one of thoselisted in the regulation, "provided that the claimant has cited or submittedcompetent scientific or medical evidence that the claimed condition is a radiogenicdisease." § 3.311(b)(4).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp94/files3/9423106.txt - 10kb89% REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Paralyzed Veterans of America,Inc. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.340, 4.16 (1993). WAYNEM. BRAEUER Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans'Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files3/9821482.txt - 15kb92% Citation Nr: 9821482 Decision Date: 07/15/98 Archive Date: 07/23/98 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. Barry F. Bohan Member, Board ofVeterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. §7266 (West 1991 & Supp.


92% 38 U.S.C. §§ 1101, 1110, 1112, 1113, 1131, 1137, 5107(a), 7104 (1992); 38C.F.R. §§ 3.307, 3.309 (1991). 38 U.S.C. §§ 1155, 5107(a), 7104 (1992); 38C.F.R. §§ 3.321, 4.7 and Part 4, Code 7000 (1991). 38 U.S.C. §§ 1155, 5107(a),7104 (1992); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321, 4.7 and Part 4, Codes 5292, 5295 (1991).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files3/9921442.txt - 29kb88% 96-35 331 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Cleveland, Ohio THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to an effectivedate earlier than April 7, 1993, for assignment of a compensable rating forcarbuncle scars on the buttocks, status post incisions. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107(West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 4.118, Diagnostic Codes 7803, 7804, 7805 (1998). 38U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.85, 4.87, Diagnostic Code6100 (1998); 64 Fed.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9721379.txt - 19kb89% Citation NR: 9721379 Decision Date: 06/18/97 Archive Date: 06/30/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. RAYMOND F. FERNER ActingMember, Board of Veterans' Appeals 38 U.S.C.A. § 7102 (West Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files3/9821379.txt - 12kb98% Citation Nr: 9821379 Decision Date: 07/14/98 Archive Date: 07/23/98 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD In accordance with the provisions of 38U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. John E. Ormond, Jr. Member, Board ofVeterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. §7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp01/files03/0121333.txt - 34kb93% 99-04 795 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in St. Paul, Minnesota THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to anincreased rating in excess of 50 percent for a skin disability and for earliereffective dates for assignment of a 50 percent rating (prior to November 1, 1996)and for assignment of an 80 percent rating (prior to July 11, 1997), respectively.Outpatient and inpatient reports from Abbott Northwest Hospital from March1993 to November 1996 show treatment.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9721318.txt - 13kb89%

Citation NR: 9721318 Decision Date: 06/18/97 Archive Date: 06/30/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board of Veterans Appeals (Board), inaccordance with the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38U.S.C.A. §§ 5108, 7105 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.156 (1996).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files3/9621113.txt - 14kb89% Citation NR: 9621113 Decision Date: 07/31/96 Archive Date: 08/06/96 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. BARBARA B. COPELAND Member,Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals AdministrativeProcedures Improvement Act, Pub.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files01/0202401.txt - 26kb88% Citation Nr: 0202401 Decision Date: 03/14/02 Archive Date: 03/25/02 DOCKETNO. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Alabama Department ofVeterans Affairs WITNESSES AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant, T. W., W.W., and S. B. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107 note (Effective and Applicability Provisions);see generally Holliday v. Principi, 14 Vet.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9720909.txt - 42kb88% Citation NR: 9720909 Decision Date: 06/13/97 Archive Date: 06/19/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. §§3.104(a), 19.129(a).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp92/files3/9221059.txt - 8kb91% 92 Decision Citation: BVA 92-21059 Y92 BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALSWASHINGTON, D.C. 20420 DOCKET NO. 90-18 471 ) DATE ) ) ) THEISSUES 1. Whether new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen theclaim of entitlement to service connection for a nervous disorder as secondary to aservice-connected skin disorder. 38 U.S.C. § 5107(a) (1992).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp94/files3/9422020.txt - 4kb90% 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (West 1991). JACK W. BLASINGAME Member, Boardof Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative ProceduresImprovement Act, Pub. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).

highlighted

http://www.va.gov/vetapp98/files3/9820635.txt - 33kb88% DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. Service connection for treatment purposesonly was granted in June 1970 for teeth numbered 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 30. MarkD. Hindin Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals NOTICE OF APPELLATERIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7266 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp96/files3/9620651.txt - 15kb88% Citation NR: 9620651 Decision Date: 07/25/96 Archive Date: 08/02/96 DOCKETNO. 94-15 759 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in New Orleans, Louisiana THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to acompensable evaluation for residuals of removal of sweat glands, bilateral.DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp94/files3/9421929.txt - 16kb95% 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(b) (1993). 38U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5107(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.303 (1993); Sabonis v.Brown, 6 Vet.App. ROBERT E. SULLIVAN Member, Board of Veterans'Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures ImprovementAct, Pub.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp01/files03/0120467.txt - 14kb97% Citation Nr: 0120467 Decision Date: 08/09/01 Archive Date: 08/14/01 DOCKETNO. 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2, 4.41; Schafrath v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. 38 C.F.R. § 4.71a,Diagnostic Codes 7804 and 7806 (2000).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files3/9720250.txt - 19kb90% Citation NR: 9720250 Decision Date: 06/11/97 Archive Date: 06/19/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West1991); 38 C.F.R. § 4.118, Diagnostic Code 7806 (1996).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp92/files3/9220368.txt - 16kb89% 38 U.S.C. §§ 1101, 1110, 1112, 1113, 1131, 1137, 5107(a) (1992); 38 C.F.R. §§3.307, 3.309 (1991). 38 U.S.C. §§ 1310, 5107(a) (1992); 38 C.F.R. § 3.312 (1991).38 U.S.C. § 1310; 38 C.F.R. § 3.312.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files2/9719808.txt - 10kb89% Citation NR: 9719808 Decision Date: 06/05/97 Archive Date: 06/13/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 1996); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.151 and3.400(b)(2)(i) (ii) (1996); Myler v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp01/files03/0119657.txt - 14kb90% Citation Nr: 0119657 Decision Date: 07/30/01 Archive Date: 08/07/01 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5110, 5111 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.31, 3.400, 3.401(2000). 38 U.S.C. 5110(f); 38 C.F.R. § 3.401(b).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp95/files5/9520507.txt - 23kb93% 93-22 597 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in San Diego, California THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to acompensable rating for chondromalacia of the right patella. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155,5107(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321(b)(1), 4.116, Diagnostic Codes 7699-7806 (1994). 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§3.321(b)(1), 4.71a, 4.118, Diagnostic Codes 7899-7819-5215 (1994).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp95/files5/9520428.txt - 18kb91% Decision Date: 09/28/95 Archive Date: 01/17/96 DOCKET NO. 38 C.F.R. §3.304(f) (1994); Doran v. Brown, 6 Vet App 283, 289 (1994). Thus, theinterpretation of the law of secondary service connection as set forth in Tobin v.Derwinski, 2 Vet.App.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files2/9919297.txt - 15kb90% Citation Nr: 9919297 Decision Date: 07/15/99 Archive Date: 07/21/99 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107 (West 1991). 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1131 (West 1991);38 C.F.R. § 3.303 (1998).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp01/files03/0119006.txt - 59kb87% 00 - 17 122 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans AffairsRegional Office in Chicago, Illinois THE ISSUES Entitlement to a rating inexcess of 60 percent for residuals of a low back strain with degenerative discdisease, L4-S1. 38 U.S.C.A. 1155, 5107(a) (West 1991), 5103A(a)-(d), effective

November 9, 2000; 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1), Part 4, §§ 4.40, 4.45, 4.59, 4.71a,Diagnostic Code 5293 (2000). 38 U.S.C.A. 1155, 5107(a) (West 1991), 5103A(a)-(d), effective November 9, 2000; 38.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files2/9718679.txt - 21kb95% Citation NR: 9718679 Decision Date: 05/30/97 Archive Date: 06/04/97 DOCKETNO. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisionsof 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107(a) (West1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321(b)(1), 4.1, 4.2, 4.7, 4.10, 4.118, Diagnostic Code (DC)7899-7806 (1996).

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp00/files2/0018548.txt - 13kb97% Citation Nr: 0018548 Decision Date: 07/14/00 Archive Date: 07/14/00 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1116; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.307; 3.309(e). 38 U.S.C.A. § 1116(b)(1);61 Fed.

highlightedhttp://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files2/9918560.txt - 34kb89% Citation Nr: 9918560 Decision Date: 07/07/99 Archive Date: 07/15/99 DOCKETNO. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(c) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1103 (1993). SeeDepartment of Veterans Benefits, Veterans' Administration, DVB Circular 21-88-8, Asbestos-Related Diseases (May 11, 1988).

highlighted Results 101 - 200 displayed. 1 2

Return to Top

VA Home Page / Search / Site Map / Facilities Locator / DisclaimerPrivacy & Security Statement / Freedom of Information Act / Contact the VA

Reviewed/Updated: 08/04/2003

Date post:	07-Mar-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	hoangthien
View:	219 times
Download:	3 times

Board of Veterans' Appeals Decisions Search · PDF fileCitation NR: 9741662 Decision Date:...

Documents