Date post: | 09-Dec-2014 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | elitedeepu |
View: | 25 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 2
Lecture 3: Bode Plots
Prof. Niknejad
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Get to know your logs!
Engineers are very conservative. A “margin” of 3dB is a factor of 2 (power)!
Knowing a few logs by memory can help you calculate logs of different ratios by employing properties of log. For instance, knowing that the ratio of 2 is 3 dB, what’s the ratio of 4?
dB ratio dB ratio-20 0.100 20 10.000-10 0.316 10 3.162
-5 0.562 5 1.778-3 0.708 3 1.413-2 0.794 2 1.259-1 0.891 1 1.122
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Bode Plot Overview
Technique for estimating a complicated transfer function (several poles and zeros) quickly
Break frequencies :
)1()1)(1(
)1()1)(1()()(
22
210
pmpp
znzzK
jjj
jjjjGH
ii
1
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Summary of Individual Factors
Simple Pole:
Simple Zero:
DC Zero:
DC Pole:
j1
1
j1
j
j1
1
dB0
dB0
dB0
dB0
90
90
90
90
1
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Example
Consider the following transfer function
Break frequencies: invert time constants
)1)(1(
)1(10)(
31
25
jj
jjjH
ps100
ns10
ns100
3
2
1
Grad/s10Mrad/s100Mrad/s10 321
)1)(1(
)1(10
)(
31
25
jj
jj
jH
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Breaking Down the Magnitude
Recall log of products is sum of logs
Let’s plot each factor separately and add them graphically
)1)(1(
)1(10
log20)(
31
25
dB
jj
jj
jH
31
25
1log201log20
1log2010
log20
jj
jj
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Breaking Down the Phase
Since
Let’s plot each factor separately and add them graphically
)1)(1(
)1(10)(
31
25
jj
jjjH
baba
31
25
11
110
)(
jj
jj
jH
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Magnitude Bode Plot: DC Zero
80
20
60
40
-20
-60
-80
-40
104 105 106 107 108 109 1010 1011
510
j
0 dB
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Phase Bode Plot: DC Zero
180
45
135
90
-45
-135
-180
-90
104 105 106 107 108 109 1010 1011
510
j
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Magnitude Bode Plot: Add First Pole
80
20
60
40
-20
-60
-80
-40
104 105 106 107 108 109 1010 1011
dB510
j
dB710
1
1
j
Mrad/s101
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Phase Bode Plot: Add First Pole
180
45
135
90
-45
-135
-180
-90
104 105 106 107 108 109 1010 1011
510
j
7101
1
j
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Magnitude Bode Plot: Add 2nd Zero
80
20
60
40
-20
-60
-80
-40
104 105 106 107 108 109 1010 1011
dB810
1j
Mrad/s1002
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Phase Bode Plot: Add 2nd Zero
180
45
135
90
-45
-135
-180
-90
104 105 106 107 108 109 1010 1011
8101
j
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Magnitude Bode Plot: Add 2nd Pole
80
20
60
40
-20
-60
-80
-40
104 105 106 107 108 109 1010 1011
dB1010
1
1
j
Grad/s103
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Phase Bode Plot: Add 2nd Pole
180
45
135
90
-45
-135
-180
-90
104 105 106 107 108 109 1010 1011
10101
j
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Comparison to “Actual” Mag Plot
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Comparison to “Actual” Phase Plot
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Why do I say “actual”?
I plotted the transfer characteristics with Mathematica
The range of frequency for the plot is 6 orders of magnitude. The program has to find the “hot spots” in order to plot the function. Near the hot spots, more points are plotted. In between hot spots, the function is interpolated. If you pick the wrong points, you’ll end up with the wrong plot:
mag = LogLinearPlot[20*Log[10, Abs[H[x]]], {x, 10^4, 10^11},PlotPoints -> 10000, Frame -> True,PlotStyle -> Thickness[.005], ImageSize -> 600,GridLines -> Automatic, PlotRange -> {{10^4, 10^11}, {-20, 100}} ]
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Don’t always believe a computer!
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Second Order Transfer Function
The series resonant circuit is one of the most important elementary circuits:
The physics describes not only physical LCR circuits, but also approximates mechanical resonance (mass-spring, pendulum, molecular resonance, microwave cavities, transmission lines, buildings, bridges, …)
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Series LCR Analysis
With phasor analysis, this circuit is readily analyzed
RICj
ILjIVs
1
RR
CjLj
VRIV
RCj
LjIV
s
s
1
1
0
+Vo
−
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Second Order Transfer Function So we have:
To find the poles/zeros, let’s put the H in canonical form:
One zero at DC frequency can’t conduct DC due to capacitor
RCj
Lj
R
V
VjH
s
1
)( 0+Vo
−
RCjLC
CRj
V
VjH
s
20
1)(
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Poles of 2nd Order Transfer Function
Denominator is a quadratic polynomial:
LR
jjLC
LR
j
RCjLC
CRj
V
VjH
s
22
0
)(11
)(
LR
jj
LR
jjH
220 )(
)(LC
120
Qjj
Qj
jH022
0
0
)()(
R
LQ 0
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Finding the poles…
Let’s factor the denominator:
Poles are complex conjugate frequencies The Q parameter is called the
“quality-factor” or Q-factor This parameters is an important
parameter:
Re
Im
0)( 20
02 Q
jj
Q
jQQQ 4
11
242 002
0
200
0RQ
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Resonance without Loss
The transfer function can parameterized in terms of loss. First, take the lossless case, R=0:
When the circuit is lossless, the poles are at real frequencies, so the transfer function blows up!
At this resonance frequency, the circuit has zero imaginary impedance
Even if we set the source equal to zero, the circuit can have a steady-state response
Re
Im
020
200
42 j
QQQ
EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 3 Prof. A. Niknejad
University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of EECS
Magnitude Response
The response peakiness depends on Q
Qj
Qj
LR
j
LR
j
jH022
0
0
0
0220
0
0
)(
1Q
10Q
100Q
0
1)(0
020
20
20
0
Qj
Qj
jH
1)( 0 jH
0)0( H