BOE PARCC Presentation Sept. 2016 - Schoolwires€¦ · SPRING 2015 AND SPRING 2016 ADMINISTRATIONS...

Measuring

College and

Career

Readiness

PARCC RESULTS:

SPRING 2015 AND SPRING 2016

ADMINISTRATIONS

NETCONG SCHOOL DISTRICT

SEPTEMBER 27, 2016

1

� 2016 marks the 2nd administration of the Partnership for

Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)

and the first opportunity to compare year-to-year results as

the following slides will show.

� Students took PARCC English Language Arts and Literacy

Assessments (ELA/L) in grades 3 – 11.

� Students took PARCC Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 –

8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry, and

Algebra II .

NEW JERSEY’S STATEWIDE

ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

2

� Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations

� Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations

� Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations

� Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations

� Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations

PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS

3

COMPARISON OF NEW JERSEY ’S

SPR ING 2015 AND SPR ING 2016 PARCC ADMIN ISTRAT IONS

ENGL ISH LANGUAGE ARTS/L I TERACY

Not Yet

Meeting

Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Meeting

Expectations

(Level 2)

Approaching

Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding

Expectations

(Level 5)

% Change in

Level 1 and

Level 2

% Change in

Level 4 and

Level 5

(College and

Career Ready)

2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016

Grade 3 15.1% 13.5%13.5%13.5%13.5% 17.8% 16.0%16.0%16.0%16.0% 23.7% 23.0%23.0%23.0%23.0% 38.6% 41.3%41.3%41.3%41.3% 4.9% 6.2%6.2%6.2%6.2% 3.4% 4.1%

Grade 4 7.8% 8.2%8.2%8.2%8.2% 14.5% 13.5%13.5%13.5%13.5% 26.6% 24.8%24.8%24.8%24.8% 39.4% 40.8%40.8%40.8%40.8% 11.7% 12.7%12.7%12.7%12.7% 0.6% 2.4%

Grade 5 7.2% 6.7%6.7%6.7%6.7% 15.1% 14.7%14.7%14.7%14.7% 26.1% 25.3%25.3%25.3%25.3% 45.1% 46.4%46.4%46.4%46.4% 6.4% 6.9%6.9%6.9%6.9% 0.9% 1.7%

Grade 6 7.9% 7.5%7.5%7.5%7.5% 15.5% 14.1%14.1%14.1%14.1% 27.8% 26.2%26.2%26.2%26.2% 39.7% 41.3%41.3%41.3%41.3% 9.1% 11.0%11.0%11.0%11.0% 1.9% 3.5%

Grade 7 10.8% 9.5%9.5%9.5%9.5% 14.5% 12.5%12.5%12.5%12.5% 23.1% 21.6%21.6%21.6%21.6% 33.9% 35.6%35.6%35.6%35.6% 17.7% 20.7%20.7%20.7%20.7% 3.3% 4.7%

Grade 8 11.5% 10.1%10.1%10.1%10.1% 14.6% 13.0%13.0%13.0%13.0% 22.3% 21.7%21.7%21.7%21.7% 39.1% 40.7%40.7%40.7%40.7% 12.5% 14.5%14.5%14.5%14.5% 3.0% 3.6%

Grade 9 17.6% 12.9%12.9%12.9%12.9% 19.0% 15.0%15.0%15.0%15.0% 23.6% 23.1%23.1%23.1%23.1% 30.3% 35.8%35.8%35.8%35.8% 9.5% 13.2%13.2%13.2%13.2% 8.7% 9.2%

Grade 10 25.3% 20.9%20.9%20.9%20.9% 17.7% 14.2%14.2%14.2%14.2% 20.3% 20.4%20.4%20.4%20.4% 25.6% 31.0%31.0%31.0%31.0% 11.0% 13.4%13.4%13.4%13.4% 7.8% 7.7%

Grade 11* 16.7% 18.5%18.5%18.5%18.5% 18.7% 18.1%18.1%18.1%18.1% 23.5% 23.3%23.3%23.3%23.3% 30.1% 31.7%31.7%31.7%31.7% 10.9% 8.4%8.4%8.4%8.4% 1.1% 0.9%

*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test.

Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

4

COMPARISON OF NEW JERSEY ’S


MATHEMAT ICS

Not Yet Meeting

Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Meeting

Expectations

(Level 2)

Approaching

Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding

Expectations

(Level 5)

% Change in

Level 1 and

Level 2

% Change in

Level 4 and

Level 5

(College and

Career Ready)2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016

Grade 3 8.3% 8.1%8.1%8.1%8.1% 18.5% 15.9%15.9%15.9%15.9% 28.3% 24.3%24.3%24.3%24.3% 36.9% 39.0%39.0%39.0%39.0% 8.0% 12.7%12.7%12.7%12.7% 2.8% 6.8%

Grade 4 7.2% 8.0%8.0%8.0%8.0% 21.9% 18.6%18.6%18.6%18.6% 30.3% 26.8%26.8%26.8%26.8% 36.3% 41.2%41.2%41.2%41.2% 4.3% 5.4%5.4%5.4%5.4% 2.5% 5.9%

Grade 5 6.1% 6.2%6.2%6.2%6.2% 20.7% 18.3%18.3%18.3%18.3% 32.1% 28.2%28.2%28.2%28.2% 34.9% 38.4%38.4%38.4%38.4% 6.1% 8.8%8.8%8.8%8.8% 2.3% 6.2%

Grade 6 7.6% 8.9%8.9%8.9%8.9% 21.4% 19.1%19.1%19.1%19.1% 30.2% 29.1%29.1%29.1%29.1% 34.8% 35.6%35.6%35.6%35.6% 6.0% 7.3%7.3%7.3%7.3% 1.0% 2.2%

Grade 7 7.7% 9.0%9.0%9.0%9.0% 22.3% 20.1%20.1%20.1%20.1% 33.3% 32.3%32.3%32.3%32.3% 33.0% 33.5%33.5%33.5%33.5% 3.8% 5.2%5.2%5.2%5.2% 0.9% 1.9%

Grade 8* 21.9% 21.5%21.5%21.5%21.5% 26.2% 25.3%25.3%25.3%25.3% 28.4% 27.5%27.5%27.5%27.5% 23.0% 24.9%24.9%24.9%24.9% 0.5% 0.7%0.7%0.7%0.7% 1.3% 2.1%

Algebra I 13.8% 12.8%12.8%12.8%12.8% 25.3% 21.3%21.3%21.3%21.3% 25.0% 24.8%24.8%24.8%24.8% 32.9% 37.3%37.3%37.3%37.3% 3.1% 3.9%3.9%3.9%3.9% 5.0% 5.2%

Algebra II 31.7% 33.5%33.5%33.5%33.5% 24.5% 22.6%22.6%22.6%22.6% 19.9% 18.8%18.8%18.8%18.8% 22.3% 22.7%22.7%22.7%22.7% 1.6% 2.4%2.4%2.4%2.4% 0.1% 1.1%

Geometry 12.4% 10.5%10.5%10.5%10.5% 35.6% 31.1%31.1%31.1%31.1% 29.7% 31.4%31.4%31.4%31.4% 19.5% 23.2%23.2%23.2%23.2% 2.9% 3.8%3.8%3.8%3.8% 6.3% 4.6%

*Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8

performance as a whole.


5

Students TestedStudents TestedStudents TestedStudents Tested

Year to YearYear to YearYear to YearYear to Year IncreaseIncreaseIncreaseIncrease2016 2015

Grade 3 99,045 95,227 3,8183,8183,8183,818

Grade 4 96,823 93,769 3,0543,0543,0543,054

Grade 5 95,760 94,599 1,1611,1611,1611,161

Grade 6 96,896 92,578 4,3184,3184,3184,318

Grade 7 95,979 90,227 5,7525,7525,7525,752

Grade 8 94,266 88,421 5,8455,8455,8455,845

Grade 9 93,830 81,574 12,25612,25612,25612,256

Grade 10 84,903 71,659 13,24413,24413,24413,244

Grade 11* 68,862 61,768 7,0947,0947,0947,094

TOTAL 826,364 769,822 56,54256,54256,54256,542

COMPARISON OF NEW JERSEY STUDENTS TESTED




Note: Data shown is preliminary. “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy.

6

Students TestedStudents TestedStudents TestedStudents Tested

Year to YearYear to YearYear to YearYear to Year IncreaseIncreaseIncreaseIncrease2016 2015

Grade 3 99,846 95,932 3,9143,9143,9143,914

Grade 4 97,620 94,484 3,1363,1363,1363,136

Grade 5 96,449 95,293 1,1561,1561,1561,156

Grade 6 97,546 93,128 4,4184,4184,4184,418

Grade 7 93,114 87,300 5,8145,8145,8145,814

Grade 8* 60,768 58,078 2,6902,6902,6902,690

Algebra I 106,118 91,740 14,37814,37814,37814,378

Algebra II 74,643 58,026 16,61716,61716,61716,617

Geometry 84,589 71,137 13,45213,45213,45213,452

TOTAL 810,693 745,118 65,57565,57565,57565,575

COMPARISON OF NEW JERSEY STUDENTS TESTED


MATHEMAT ICS

*Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math

assessment.

Notes: Data shown is preliminary. “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for Mathematics.

7

COMPARISON OF NETCONG SCHOOL D ISTRICT SPR ING 2015 AND SPR ING 2016 PARCC ADMIN ISTRAT IONS


Not Yet Meeting

Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Meeting

Expectations

(Level 2)

Approaching

Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding

Expectations

(Level 5)

2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016

Grade 3 3% 20% 19% 24% 34% 16% 41% 36% 3% 4%

Grade 4 6% 8% 6% 16% 19% 29% 61% 42% 6% 5%

Grade 5 6% 7% 6% 3% 25% 21% 59% 62% 3% 7%

Grade 6 0% 3% 15% 9% 33% 25% 52% 53% 0% 9%

Grade 7 4% 0% 21% 12% 32% 21% 43% 41% 0% 27%

Grade 80% 8% 6% 31% 21% 23% 59% 39% 15% 0%


Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. 8

COMPARISON OF NETCONG SCHOOL D ISTRICTSPR ING 2015 AND SPR ING 2016 PARCC ADMIN ISTRAT IONS

MATHEMAT ICS

Not Yet Meeting

Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Meeting

Expectations

(Level 2)

Approaching

Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding

Expectations

(Level 5)

2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016 2015 2016201620162016

Grade 3 3% 0%0%0%0% 12% 24%24%24%24% 27% 24%24%24%24% 55% 40%40%40%40% 3% 3%3%3%3%

Grade 4 0% 5%5%5%5% 16% 21%21%21%21% 58% 45%45%45%45% 23% 29%29%29%29% 3% 0%0%0%0%

Grade 5 3% 3%3%3%3% 6% 3%3%3%3% 34% 48%48%48%48% 56% 38%38%38%38% 0% 7%7%7%7%

Grade 6 0% 0%0%0%0% 33% 16%16%16%16% 18% 10%10%10%10% 42% 68%68%68%68% 6% 7%7%7%7%

Grade 7 7% 0%0%0%0% 25% 21%21%21%21% 32% 24%24%24%24% 36% 41%41%41%41% 0% 15%15%15%15%

Grade 8* 5% 5%5%5%5% 23% 20%20%20%20% 14% 60%60%60%60% 59% 10%10%10%10% 0% 5%5%5%5%

Algebra I 0% 0%0%0%0% 0% 0%0%0%0% 25% 17%17%17%17% 75% 83%83%83%83% 0% 0%0%0%0%

*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not

representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.

Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. 9

% Change in Level 1 and Level 2 % Change in Level 4 and Level 5

Netcong Elementary School State Netcong Elementary School State

L1 L2 % Change L4 L5 % Change

Grade 3 + 17 + 5 + 22 3.4% - 5 + 1 - 4 4.1%

Grade 4 + 8 +16 + 24 0.6% - 19 - 1 - 20 2.4%

Grade 5 + 1 - 3 - 2 0.9% + 3 + 4 + 7 1.7%

Grade 6 + 3 - 6 - 3 1.9% + 1 + 9 + 10 3.5%

Grade 7 - 4 - 9 - 13 3.3% - 2 + 27 + 25 4.7%

Grade 8 + 8 + 25 + 33 3.0% - 20 - 15 -35 3.6%

COMPARISON OF NETCONG SCHOOL DISTRICT

2015-2016 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY


Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

- An up arrow indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a down arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year. 10


<INSERT DISTRICT NAME> State <INSERT DISTRICT NAME> State

Grade 3 2.8% 6.8%

Grade 4 2.5% 5.9%

Grade 5 2.3% 6.2%

Grade 6 1.0% 2.2%

Grade 7 0.9% 1.9%

Grade 8 1.3% 2.1%

Algebra I* 5.0% 5.2%

Algebra II 0.1% 1.1%

Geometry 6.3% 4.6%

COMPARISON OF NETCONG SCHOOL DISTRICT

2015-2016 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

MATHEMATICS

*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are

not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.


- An up arrow indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a down arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year.

11


Netcong Elementary School State Netcong Elementary School State

L1 L2 L4 L5

Grade 3 - 3 + 12 + 9 2.8% - 5 0 - 5 6.8%

Grade 4 + 5 + 5 +10 2.5% + 6 - 3 + 3 5.9%

Grade 5 0 - 3 - 3 2.3% - 18 + 7 - 11 6.2%

Grade 6 0 - 16 - 16 1.0% + 26 +1 + 27 2.2%

Grade 7 - 7 - 4 - 11 0.9% + 5 + 15 + 20 1.9%

Grade 8 0 - 3 - 3 1.3% - 49 + 5 - 44 2.1%

Algebra I* 0 0 0 5.0% + 8 0 + 8 5.2%

Grade 3

% >=

Level 4

Grade 4

% >=

Level 4

Grade 5

% >=

Level 4

Grade 6

% >=

Level 4

Grade 7

% >=

Level 4

Grade 8

% >=

Level 4

NetcongNetcongNetcongNetcong 40%40%40%40% 47%47%47%47% 69%69%69%69% 63%63%63%63% 68%68%68%68% 39%39%39%39%


2016 SPRING PARCC SCHOOL- & GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES


12

Grade 3

% >=

Level 4

Grade 4

% >=

Level 4

Grade 5

% >=

Level 4

Grade 6

% >=

Level 4

Grade 7

% >=

Level 4

Grade 8

% >=

Level 4

Algebra I

% >= Level

4

District 52%52%52%52% 29%29%29%29% 45%45%45%45% 74%74%74%74% 56%56%56%56% 15%15%15%15% 83%83%83%83%


2016 SPRING PARCC SCHOOL- & GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES

MATHEMATICS

13

ELAELAELAELA 2014-15 Students Tested

Difference2015 Enrollment

Grade 3 32 33 1111

Grade 4 31 31 0000

Grade 5 32 32 0000

Grade 6 33 33 0000

Grade 7 28 28 0000

Grade 8 34 35 1111

TOTAL 190 192 2222

COMPARISON OF NETCONG SCHOOL D IS TR ICT

STUDENTS TESTED




Note: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy.14

ELAELAELAELA 2015-16 Students Tested


Grade 3 25 25 0000

Grade 4 38 38 0000

Grade 5 29 29 0000

Grade 6 32 33 1111

Grade 7 34 34 0000

Grade 8 26 26 0000

TOTAL 184 185 1111

COMPARISON OF NETCONG SCHOOL D IS TR ICT

STUDENTS TESTED


MATHEMAT ICS

*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative

of grade 8 performance as a whole.

Notes: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for Mathematics. 15

MathMathMathMath 2014-15 Students Tested


Grade 3 32 33 1111

Grade 4 31 31 0000

Grade 5 32 32 0000

Grade 6 33 33 0000

Grade 7 28 28 0000

Grade 8 * 22

35 1111Algebra 12

TOTAL 190 192 2222

MathMathMathMath 2015-16 Students Tested


Grade 3 25 25 0000

Grade 4 38 38 0000

Grade 5 29 29 0000

Grade 6 32 33 1111

Grade 7 34 34 0000

Grade 8 20

26 0000Algebra 6

TOTAL 184 185 1111

Count Count Count Count

of Valid of Valid of Valid of Valid

TestTestTestTest

ScoresScoresScoresScores

Not Yet Not Yet Not Yet Not Yet

MeetingMeetingMeetingMeeting

(Level(Level(Level(Level 1)1)1)1)

PartiallyPartiallyPartiallyPartially


(Level 2)(Level 2)(Level 2)(Level 2)

ApproachingApproachingApproachingApproaching

ExpectationsExpectationsExpectationsExpectations





ExceedingExceedingExceedingExceeding

ExpectationExpectationExpectationExpectation


District % District % District % District %

>=>=>=>= Level Level Level Level

4444

Female 11 0 27% 18% 46% 9% 55%55%55%55%

Male 14 36% 21% 14% 29% 0 29%29%29%29%

Hispanic 7 29% 57% 0 14% 0 14%14%14%14%

American Indian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000

Asian 2 50% 0 50% 0 0 0000

African American 2 0 50% 0 50% 0 50%50%50%50%

Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000

White 14 14% 7% 21% 50% 7% 57%57%57%57%

2 or more Race 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000

Economically Dis. 8 50% 25% 13% 13% 0 13%13%13%13%

Special Ed 5 80% 20% 0 0 0 0000


2016 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

GRADE 3 - - - - -ONE SECTION OF 25 STUDENTS


16



TestTestTestTest



















4444

Female 23 4% 17% 22% 48% 9% 57%57%57%57%

Male 15 13% 13% 40% 33% 0 33%33%33%33%

Hispanic 10 20% 30% 20% 30% 0 30%30%30%30%


Asian 1 0 0 0 100% 0 100%100%100%100%

African American 1 0 0 100% 0 0 0000


White 26 4% 12% 31% 46% 8% 54%54%54%54%

2 or more Race 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000


Special Ed 6 0 33% 33% 33% 0 33%33%33%33%



GRADE 4


17



TestTestTestTest



















4444

Female 12 8% 0 33% 50% 8% 58%58%58%58%

Male 17 6% 6% 12% 71% 6% 77%77%77%77%

Hispanic 9 0 0 22% 78% 0 78%78%78%78%


Asian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000

African American 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000


White 20 10% 5% 20% 55% 10% 65%65%65%65%

2 or more Race 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000

Economically Dis. 12 17% 0 33% 50% 0 50%50%50%50%

Special Ed 4 50% 0 50% 0 0 0000



GRADE 5


18



TestTestTestTest



















4444

Female 13 0 8% 23% 62% 8% 70%70%70%70%

Male 19 5% 11% 26% 47% 11% 58%58%58%58%

Hispanic 12 0 17% 33% 42% 8% 50%50%50%50%


Asian 2 0 0 0 50% 50% 100%100%100%100%

African American 2 0 0 0 100% 0 100%100%100%100%


White 16 6% 6% 25% 56% 6% 62%62%62%62%

2 or more Race 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000

Economically Dis. 13 0 23% 31% 39% 8% 47%47%47%47%

Special Ed 4 25% 50% 25% 0 0 0000



GRADE 6


19

Count of Count of Count of Count of

Valid Valid Valid Valid

TestTestTestTest



















4444

Female 14 0 7% 14% 29% 50% 79%79%79%79%

Male 20 0 15% 25% 50% 10% 60%60%60%60%

Hispanic 10 0 10% 10% 60% 20% 80%80%80%80%


Asian 3 0 0 33% 0 67% 67%67%67%67%

African American 2 0 50% 50% 0 0 0000


White 19 0 11% 21% 42% 26% 68%68%68%68%

2 or more Race 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000


Special Ed 8 0 50% 25% 13% 13% 26%26%26%26%



GRADE 7


20



TestTestTestTest



















4444

Female 14 0 22% 29% 50% 0 50%50%50%50%

Male 12 17% 42% 17% 25% 0 25%25%25%25%

Hispanic 8 13% 38% 25% 25% 0 25%25%25%25%


Asian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000

African American 1 0 100% 0 0 0 0000

Pacific Islander 1 0 0 100% 0 0 0000

White 16 6% 25% 19% 50% 0 50%50%50%50%

2 or more Race 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000


Special Ed 9 11% 56% 33% 0 0 0000



GRADE 8


21



GRADE 3 - - - - - - - -ONE SECTION OF 25 STUDENTS

MATHEMATICS


Valid TestValid TestValid TestValid Test



















4444

Female 11 0 18% 18% 55% 9% 64%64%64%64%

Male 14 0 29% 29% 29% 14% 43%43%43%43%

Hispanic 7 0 14% 71% 14% 0 14%14%14%14%


Asian 2 0 50% 0 50% 0 50%50%50%50%

African American 2 0 50% 0 0 50% 50%50%50%50%


White 14 0 21% 7% 57% 14% 71%71%71%71%

2 or more Race 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000


Special Ed 5 0 60% 40% 0 0 0000

22



GRADE 4

MATHEMATICS





















4444

Female 23 9% 17% 48% 26% 0 26%26%26%26%

Male 15 0 27% 40% 33% 0 33%33%33%33%

Hispanic 10 0 50% 40% 10% 0 10%10%10%10%


Asian 1 0 0 0 100% 0 100%100%100%100%



White 26 8% 12% 50% 31% 0 31%31%31%31%

2 or more Race 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000

Economically Dis. 9 0 44% 44% 11% 0 11%11%11%11%

Special Ed 6 33% 0 50% 17% 0 17%17%17%17%

23



GRADE 5

MATHEMATICS





















4444

Female 12 8% 0 42% 42% 8% 50%50%50%50%

Male 17 0 6% 53% 35% 6% 41%41%41%41%

Hispanic 9 0 0 56% 44% 0 44%44%44%44%


Asian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000

African American 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000


White 20 5% 5% 45% 35% 10% 45%45%45%45%

2 or more Race 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000

Economically Dis. 12 0 0 53% 35% 12% 47%47%47%47%

Special Ed 4 25% 25% 50% 0 0 0000

24



GRADE 6

MATHEMATICS





















4444

Female 12 0 17% 8% 67% 8% 75%75%75%75%

Male 19 0 16% 11% 68% 5% 74%74%74%74%

Hispanic 11 0 18% 9% 74% 0 73%73%73%73%


Asian 2 0 0 0 100% 0 100%100%100%100%



White 16 0 19% 13% 56% 13% 69%69%69%69%

2 or more Race 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000


Special Ed 4 0 100% 0 0 0 0000

25



GRADE 7

MATHEMATICS





















4444

Female 14 0 14% 7% 50% 29% 79%79%79%79%

Male 20 0 25% 35% 35% 5% 40%40%40%40%

Hispanic 10 0 20% 30% 50% 0 50%50%50%50%


Asian 3 0 0 33% 33% 33% 66%66%66%66%



White 19 0 16% 21% 42% 21% 63%63%63%63%

2 or more Race 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000


Special Ed 8 0 63% 25% 13% 0 13%13%13%13%

26



GRADE 8

MATHEMATICS





















4444

Female 9 0 22% 56% 22% 0 22%22%22%22%

Male 11 9% 18% 64% 0 9% 9%9%9%9%

Hispanic 8 13% 25% 63% 0 0 0000


Asian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000


Pacific Islander 1 0 0 0 100% 0 100%100%100%100%

White 10 0 10% 70% 10% 10% 20%20%20%20%

2 or more Race 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000


Special Ed 9 11% 22% 67% 0 0 0000

27



GRADE 8

ALGEBRA





















4444

Female 5 20% 80% 80%80%80%80%

Male 1 100% 100%100%100%100%

Hispanic 0

American Indian 0

Asian 0

African American 0

Pacific Islander 0

White 6 17% 83% 83%83%83%83%

2 or more Race 0

Economically Dis. 2 25% 75% 75%75%75%75%

Special Ed 0

28

ELA

AVERAGE SCORES

CrossCrossCrossCross----

StateStateStateState

NJNJNJNJ

Average Average Average Average

ScoreScoreScoreScore

NetcongNetcongNetcongNetcong

Grade 3 738 746 737737737737

Grade 4 742 751 743743743743

Grade 5 742 751 752752752752

Grade 6 741 750 755755755755

Grade 7 742 753 757757757757

Grade 8 743 753 735735735735

650-699 Not Met

700-724 Partially Met

725-749 Approached

750 = Met

750-X Met (Varies)

Varies Exceeded (Varies)

2015-16

MATH

AVERAGE SCORES2015-16

CrossCrossCrossCross----

StateStateStateState

NJNJNJNJ

Average Average Average Average

ScoreScoreScoreScore

NetcongNetcongNetcongNetcong

Grade 3 743 750 752752752752

Grade 4 738 746 738738738738

Grade 5 739 747 749749749749

Grade 6 736 743 759759759759

Grade 7 735 740 753753753753

Grade 8

Math

728 726 732732732732

Grade 8

Algebra

734 741 767767767767

650-699 Not Met

700-724 Partially Met

725-749 Approached

750 = Met

750-X Met (Varies)

Varies Exceeded (Varies)

QUESTIONS TO GUIDE PARCC DATA

REFLECTION

�How will we use PARCC data to identify strengths and gaps that exist in our curriculum and instruction?

�How will we use PARCC data as a tool to address areas in need of improvement or enhancement?

�How can we provide additional resources and support for our educators to meet the learning needs of all our students?

31

RESOURCES FOR PARENTS

� Information on the new 2015Information on the new 2015Information on the new 2015Information on the new 2015----16 PARCC Student Reports: 16 PARCC Student Reports: 16 PARCC Student Reports: 16 PARCC Student Reports:

www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/parcc/scores/www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/parcc/scores/www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/parcc/scores/www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/parcc/scores/

� Understanding the student score reports (with translations): Understanding the student score reports (with translations): Understanding the student score reports (with translations): Understanding the student score reports (with translations):

understandthescore.org/understandthescore.org/understandthescore.org/understandthescore.org/

S amp l e r e p o r t

32

33

2015-16

NJ ASK SCIENCE

&

FINAL AVERAGES

15-16 Grade 4

� 58% Advanced Proficient

� 36% Proficient

� 6% Partially Proficient

34

NJ ASK SCIENCE

15-16 Grade 8

� 16 % Advanced Proficient

� 42 % Proficient

� 42 % Partially Proficient

14-15 Grade 4


� 46% Proficient

� 5 % Partially Proficient

14-15 Grade 8


� 69% Proficient

� 20% Partially Proficient

2014-15

� 91 students = C, D, or F

� 290 enrollment

� 31 % earned C, D, or F

2015-16

� 108 students = C, D, or F

� 294 enrollment

� 37 % earned C, D, or F

3 = Fs 1 %

40 = Ds 14 %

65 = Cs 22%

35

15-16 ANALYSIS OF FINAL AVERAGES

36

2015-16

PLACEMENT TEST

ALGEBRA & SPANISH

37

0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%

50%50%50%50% = C= C= C= C

33%33%33%33% = D= D= D= D

17%17%17%17% = F= F= F= F

Alg I Placement Test Scores 15-16 8th Grade

A B C D F

38

0%0%0%0%

40%40%40%40% = B= B= B= B

60%60%60%60% = C= C= C= C

0%0%0%0% 0%0%0%0%

Spanish I Placement Scores 15Spanish I Placement Scores 15Spanish I Placement Scores 15Spanish I Placement Scores 15----16161616

A B C D F

If you have any questions please contact

Dr. Gina Cinotti

Chief School Administrator

[email protected]

973-347-0020, x211

39

QUESTIONS

Date post:	02-Jun-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

BOE PARCC Presentation Sept. 2016 - Schoolwires€¦ · SPRING 2015 AND SPRING 2016 ADMINISTRATIONS...

Documents