+ All Categories
Home > Business > Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Date post: 18-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: nikolay-piryankov
View: 6,038 times
Download: 6 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
This is the handout slides from Manchester Business School's presentation at the GBCC in Seattle. The team was made up of myself, Marc, Mili and Richard and was based on the supply chain management issues that Boeing were facing at the time.
18
Build-to-Home Grounded Boarding Take off Maintenance
Transcript
Page 1: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Build-to-HomeGrounded Boarding Take offMaintenance

Page 2: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

PESTLE

• Political• Economics• Social• Technologi

cal• Legal• Environme

ntal

SWOT

• Strengths• Weakness

es• Opportunit

ies• Threats

Analysis

Problem Solution Implementation Finances

Page 3: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Analysis

China – WTO & AirbusGlobal Recession

Technological Strategic WindowSuppliers Developing Core

CompetenciesLegal Issue – Pratt & Whitney

Oil PricesEnvironmental Regulation and

ReformProblem Solution Implementation Finances

Page 4: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Current Supply ChainDevelopment of 787

Reliant onOUTSOURCING

PROBLEMSDelays and penaltiesThreat of IP theftTwo-tier outsourcingResponsibility vs. Accountability

- lack of control

Parts

Boeing:

35%Japan: 35%

Italy: 26%

Problem Solution Implementation Finances

Page 5: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Grounded Boarding Take OffMaintenance

Solution

Page 6: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Supply Chain Management

High

Low

HighLow

Complexity of Supply Market

Imp

act

on

B

usi

ness Kraljic MatrixNon-critical

Many suppliersLow impact on

business BUT still may cause delays

StrategicFew Suppliers

High impact on business

Good relationship is key

Example: Food Service Equipment (Diethelm

Keller Aviation)

Example: Wingbox (Alenia)

Problem Solution Implementation Finances

Page 7: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Customer Relationship Management

“Safe Pair of Hands”

Soft ApproachFoster trust through transparency of operations

and soft-sell techniquesR Cheap, quick and easy to do

Q Repeated delays may make it difficult to believe

BUT WE RECOMMEND: Hard Approach Make a guarantee to deliver that is favourable to

the clientR Significant improvement in customer relations

Q High RiskProblem Solution Implementa

tion Finances

Page 8: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Leveraging the Experience

Lessons learned

• To reduce dependency on individual suppliers by:• Using multi-sourcing• Bringing them closer to us• Effectively monitor and manage suppliers• Build on supplier knowledge• Find a way to increase job security

Build-to-print and Build-to-performanceTAKE THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS

Problem Solution Implementation Finances

Page 9: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Grounded Boarding Take OffMaintenance

Implementation

Page 10: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

LT Implementation Plan

Begin planning Sky Valley

Supplier management programme

2-part identification of suppliers

Non- Critical

vs.Strategic

Problem Solution Implementation Finances

Page 11: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

LT Implementation Plan

Begin planning Sky Valley

Supplier management programme

2-part identification of suppliers

Methods used to grow Sky Valley

Develop Core Competencies

Non- Critical

vs.Strategic -Bargaining

Power &Cost Savings-Incentives to

relocate-Affiliate branch

-Acquisition

Problem Solution Implementation Finances

Page 12: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

LT Implementation Plan

Begin planning Sky Valley

Supplier management programme

2 part identification of suppliers

Methods used to grow Sky Valley

Develop Core CompetenciesTake

Advantage of Benefits

Lower Costs- Less

inventory- Transportati

on- Transaction

Synergies-

Procurement Economies of

Scale-

Communication

- Wastage

Labour- Pool of workers

- Commitment to region: job

security

Page 13: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Grounded Boarding Take OffMaintenance

Financials

Page 14: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

FinancialsGrowth:• $32bn by 2013

commercial aviation• Following this – 3.2%pa

Incremental Cost of Sky Valley:• Incentives to re-locate :

~$2bn in in first 10 years until critical mass is reached• Higher salaries: more

workers in the USA – based on global wage differences and COGS growth rate

Problem Solution Implementation Finances

Benefits• Reduced penalties:

>$1bn in first 5 years • Transport cost savings:

increase as Sky Valley grows: 50% “near-sourced” by 2015• Labour Dispute

Savings: $150m annually

Qualitative• Efficiency• Communication• Synergies

Page 15: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Financials

Problem Solution Implementation Finances

$1bn NPV

Discount rate of 11.5%

Page 16: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Alternatives

Page 17: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Alternatives

Strategy

Do Nothing

Stop Outsourcing

Sky Valley

Feasible

R

T

R

Suitable

T

R

R

Acceptable

T

R

R

Page 18: Boeing Case Study - 2010 Global Business Case Study Competition

Conclusion

Conclusion


Recommended