The register as an instrument of The register as an instrument of

knowledge:knowledge:

• Supporting decision makers in both • Supporting decision makers in both

design and investment choices to optimize design and investment choices to optimize

the use of resourcesthe use of resources

• Making more effective interventions in • Making more effective interventions in

case of failure, and to ensure greater case of failure, and to ensure greater

security of networks and systemssecurity of networks and systems

UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE REGISTER

security of networks and systemssecurity of networks and systems

• Making it easier to design renovations of • Making it easier to design renovations of

a network or its expansion a network or its expansion

• Identifying existing usable infrastructure • Identifying existing usable infrastructure

in order to reuse them in order to reuse them

•Facilitating access to information on •Facilitating access to information on

networks layout in order to avoid networks layout in order to avoid

interference constructioninterference construction

FFINDINGINDING THETHE RIGHTRIGHT APPROACHAPPROACH FORFOR AA NATIONALNATIONAL UNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTUREINFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERREGISTER

FFINDINGINDING THETHE RIGHTRIGHT APPROACHAPPROACH FORFOR AA NATIONALNATIONAL UNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTUREINFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERREGISTER

“Progettazione Partecipata dei Sottoservizi

nei Territori dei Comuni di Milano, Rho, Pero e

Arese - 2010-2012”

Key elements:

• Mapping networks of existing shared

standards;

Comune Arese

Comune Pero

THE PILOT PROJECTTHE PILOT PROJECT

• Testing georadar available technologies and

prototypes

Purpose: to allow the government to define

best targets, priorities and policies for optimal

planning of underground infrastructure.

FFINDINGINDING THETHE RIGHTRIGHT APPROACHAPPROACH FORFOR AA NATIONALNATIONAL UNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTUREINFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERREGISTER

Comune Rho

Mapping the pilot area:

•Acquiring of utility database

•Instrumental surveys

•Processing of all different

dataset

•Mashing of the geodatabase

•Data representation

Evaluation of Evaluation of feasibilityfeasibility -- Evaluation of Evaluation of costscosts -- Model Model testingtesting

Cost evaluation in relation to:

•Different mapping methods:

�Digital Slit trenches

�GPR standard

�GPR 3D complex

•Data processing

•Data mashing

Define a management-design

solution:

•Regional level: management of

a public portal containing all

the regional common dataset

•Local authorities: data

interchange infrastructure for

sharing information between

utility company and authorities

PROJECT STRUCTUREPROJECT STRUCTURE

•Data representation

•Webgis portal

•Data mashing

•2d-3d webgis

utility company and authorities

•Adoption of common database

tables

FFINDINGINDING THETHE RIGHTRIGHT APPROACHAPPROACH FORFOR AA NATIONALNATIONAL UNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTUREINFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERREGISTER

Milano

Rho

Pero

Arese

A PILOT PROJECT FOR MILANO, RHO, PERO, ARESEA PILOT PROJECT FOR MILANO, RHO, PERO, ARESE

FFINDINGINDING THETHE RIGHTRIGHT APPROACHAPPROACH FORFOR AA NATIONALNATIONAL UNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTUREINFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERREGISTER

Project area: 48.166.242 mq Population in the area: 168.966 abitanti

Area occupied by utilities: 2.423.212 mq Index for utility crowding on the area = 5%

Networks: water, electricity, centralised heating, sewage, storm water, gas, TLC, public lightning

Utility companies: ENEL, Colt, Ianomi, Metroweb, Telecom, Fastweb, Wind, Terna, A2A, Snam, MM

Comune di Arese (m2) 485,222.00

Comune di Pero (m2) 380,955.00

Comune di Rho (m2) 542,740.00

Comune di Milano (m2) 1,014,295.00

Aree comunali interessate dal progetto

Key element of the projects is the

practical aproach, with 228.000 sqm of

GPR mapping sutes distributed within

the 4 municipalities

A PILOT PROJECT FOR MILANO, RHO, PERO, ARESEA PILOT PROJECT FOR MILANO, RHO, PERO, ARESE

Comune di Milano (m2) 1,014,295.00

Totale aree comunali (m2) 2,423,212.00

FFINDINGINDING THETHE RIGHTRIGHT APPROACHAPPROACH FORFOR AA NATIONALNATIONAL UNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTUREINFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERREGISTER

DATA ACQUISITIONDATA ACQUISITION

HistoricalHistorical databasedatabase

GPR and moreGPR and more

FFINDINGINDING THETHE RIGHTRIGHT APPROACHAPPROACH FORFOR AA NATIONALNATIONAL UNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTUREINFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERREGISTER

DATA MASHINGDATA MASHING

FFINDINGINDING THETHE RIGHTRIGHT APPROACHAPPROACH FORFOR AA NATIONALNATIONAL UNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTUREINFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERREGISTER

TEST SITE SURVEYTEST SITE SURVEY

FFINDINGINDING THETHE RIGHTRIGHT APPROACHAPPROACH FORFOR AA NATIONALNATIONAL UNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTUREINFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERREGISTER

PLAN POSITION ACCURACYPLAN POSITION ACCURACY

35%

is the estimate discrepancy between historical and instrumental dataset

FFINDINGINDING THETHE RIGHTRIGHT APPROACHAPPROACH FORFOR AA NATIONALNATIONAL UNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTUREINFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERREGISTER

DATA LAYOUT: 2D WEBGIS PORTAL DATA LAYOUT: 2D WEBGIS PORTAL

FFINDINGINDING THETHE RIGHTRIGHT APPROACHAPPROACH FORFOR AA NATIONALNATIONAL UNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTUREINFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERREGISTER

DATA LAYOUT: 3D WEBGIS PORTAL DATA LAYOUT: 3D WEBGIS PORTAL

FFINDINGINDING THETHE RIGHTRIGHT APPROACHAPPROACH FORFOR AA NATIONALNATIONAL UNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTUREINFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERREGISTER

FFINDINGINDING THETHE RIGHTRIGHT APPROACHAPPROACH FORFOR AA NATIONALNATIONAL UNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTUREINFRASTRUCTURE REGISTERREGISTER