+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Boiling Heat Transfer - LTH · Transition Boiling -Localised dry patches on the wall Film Boiling -...

Boiling Heat Transfer - LTH · Transition Boiling -Localised dry patches on the wall Film Boiling -...

Date post: 14-Mar-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 20 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
17
Boiling Heat Transfer Dr Vishwas Wadekar Technology Director HTFS Research Aspen Technology Definitions/Terminology Saturation temperature (T sat ) - boiling point temperature at prevailing pressure. For a mixture this will be bubble point temp. Superheat-excess temperature over the saturation value (T - T sat ) Wall superheat = (T wall -T sat ) Subcooling- opposite of superheat given by (T sat - T ) Quality- Vapour phase mass fraction, ratio of vapour flowrate to total flowrate Subcooled and saturated boiling Pool Boiling
Transcript

Boiling Heat Transfer

Dr Vishwas Wadekar

Technology Director HTFS Research Aspen Technology

Definitions/Terminology�Saturation temperature (Tsat ) - boiling point temperature at prevailing pressure. For a mixture this will be bubble point temp.

� Superheat-excess temperature over the saturation value (T - Tsat)•Wall superheat = (Twall - Tsat)

�Subcooling- opposite of superheat given by (Tsat - T )

�Quality- Vapour phase mass fraction, ratio of vapour flowrate to total flowrate

�Subcooled and saturated boiling

Pool Boiling

Pool Boiling Curve - I

Single

Phase

Nucleate

Boiling

Transition

Boiling

Film

Boiling

LOG Wall Superheat ( Tw - Tsat )

LO

G (

q)

Critical

heat flux

(Wall temperature controlled case)

Single Phase - No

bubbles, wall superheat too low

Nucleate Boiling -Bubbles grow and

break away from wall. Coefficient

increases with ∆Tsat

Transition Boiling -Localised dry

patches on the wall

Film Boiling - Vapour film at wall

Pool Boiling Curve - II

Single

Phase

Nucleate

Boiling

Transition

Boiling

Film

Boiling

LOG Wall Superheat ( Tw - Tsat )

LO

G (

q)

Critical

heat flux

(Heat flux controlled case)

Single Phase - No

bubbles, wall superheat too low

Nucleate Boiling -

Bubbles grow and break away from

wall. Coefficient

increases with ∆Tsat

Transition Boiling -Localised dry

patches on the wall

Film Boiling - Vapour film at wall

Pool Boiling Curve for water

Equilibrium Bubble- Force Balance

r

π r2 ∆p = 2π r σ

∆p = 2 σ/ r

σ

∆p

∆p - Excess pressure; σ - surface tension

p pb

Bubble Growth-I

� Bubble will be at equilibrium if (pb - p) = ∆p

� Bubble will grow if (pb - p) > ∆p

ρ gv

sat

h

T =

dp

dT

∆∆p

∆∆∆∆T

Tsat

p

∆p = 2 σ/ r

� Bubble will grow if (Tb - Tsat ) > ∆Τs where,∆Ts = (2 σ/ r)(dT/dp)

� dT/dp can be obtained from Claussius-Clapeyron

equation; assuming ρl >> ρg

Bubble Growth-IIFinal equation

For water @ 373 K with r = 5x10-6, superheat required is -

ρ∆

σ∆

gv

sats

h r

T 2 T =

K2

T s 5.6)6.0)(102260)(105(

373059.036

=××

××=∆

Bubble Nucleation

� Bubble starts with r = 0, therefore ∆Ts = α !!

� Equation is based on continuum theory; we should look at behaviour of molecules as r → 0

� However, even statistical thermodynamics gives very high ∆Ts ( in hundreds of K )

� How to reconcile this with practical experience??

ρ∆

σ∆

gv

sats

h r

T 2 T =

Heterogeneous Nucleation

• Microscopic cavities in heating wall surface

• Initially gas/vapour is trapped in them as liquid is filled

• This provides for initial nucleation

• What about subsequent continued nucleation?

Heterogeneous Nucleation

• Each departing bubble leaves small amount vapour at the cavity bottom

• This provides nucleation for subsequent bubble

• Thus the cycle of nucleation, bubble growth and departure continues

Bubble Departure� Surface tension holds the bubble to the surface� Buoyancy force, g(ρL– ρV)detach bubble from heating surface � Bubble departs when it has become large enough so that buoyancy forces > surface tension

forces� What will happen if buoyancy forces are decreased? How?

Nucleate Boiling Correlations

From pool boiling curveq = B(∆T)m

Define q = αnb∆T

so αnb = Aqn

Note: A and n depend on fluid, pressure,

and surfaceTypical value of n is 2/3, hence αnb is dependent on heat flux (or ∆T)

Nucleate Boiling Correlations

• Correlations - Two types– Based on reduced pressure

– Based on physically based dimensionless groups

• Reduced Pressure correlation– Example: Cooper correlation

667.0Xqnb =α

where pc is critical pressure (N/m2), pr = p/pc, , M = molecular weight, A =dimensional

constant, ε = surface roughness (µm)

( )( ) 5.055.0

10

log21.012.0log10 −−−

−= MpApX rr

ε

Two-phase Flow Patterns and ∆p Prediction

Definitions/Terminologylg MMM &&& +=

( )lg

g

gMM

Mx

&&

&

+=

( )S

Mm;

S

Mm;

S

MM

S

Mm l

l

g

g

lg&

&

&

&

&&&

& ==+

==

( )

l

g

l

g

g

g

xmU;

xmU

ρρ

−==

1&&

– Mass flow rate

– Vapour quality

– Mass flux

– Superficial velocity

Definitions: Void Fraction

– Void fraction is a volume fraction for gas phase

– For one dimensional model this becomes the area fraction for gas phaseAg

S - total area Ag - gas phase

flow area

S

Ag

g =ε

Flow Patterns – Vertical Upflow

Bubble Slug Churn Annular Wispy annular

Flow Patterns – Horizontal Flow - I

Bubble Flow

Stratified Flow

Wavy Flow

Flow Patterns – Horizontal Flow - II

Annular Flow

Slug Flow

Plug Flow

Semi-slug Flow

Example of Flow Pattern Map - I

–Flow pattern map of Hewitt and Roberts (1969) for vertical upflow in tubes

2

llUρ

2

ggUρ

AnnularWispy

annular

Churn

Slug

Bubble

Example of Flow Pattern Map - IIComposite graph of Taitel and Dukler (1976) based on models for flow pattern transitions (horizontal tubes)

ρ∆

ρ=

gDUFr

g

g

( )

ρ∆=

gD

dz/dpT

l

lReFrK =00

.1

Flow Pattern Transition

Slug flow

Annular flow

Flow Patterns: Upflow Boiling

Annular

Churn

Slug

Bubble

Dispersed

–Single phase liquid inlet

–Amount of vapour fraction increases along the length

–Hence different flow patterns

Frictional Pressure Drop

L

2

LL

L D

mf2

dz

dp

ρ=

&

TP

2

TPTP

TP D

mf2

dz

dp

ρ=

&

For single phase flow

then for two phase flow

What are fTP, mTP, ρTP?

Frictional Pressure Drop

LTP

L

2

L

2

TP

L

TP

TP dz

dp

m

m

f

f

dz

dp

ρ

ρ

=

&

&

Dividing two phase ∆p by single phase ∆p

Thus ΦL contains all unknowns

L

2

Ldz

dp

φ=

Lockhart-Martinelli Correlation2

L

LTP dz

dp

dz

dpφ

=

L

LL

L D

mf2

dz

dp

ρ=

&

= function of (X2)2

g

l

dz

dp

dz

dp

X

=2

φl φg

100

X

100

Lockhart-Martinelli Parameter• Martinelli parameter is square root of ratio of liquid to gas frictional pressure gradient

• For turbulent-turbulent flow it can be shown that

Xtt Martinelli parameter

=

1.05.09.01

η

η

ρ

ρ

g

l

l

g

x

x

Flow Boiling

• Convective heat transfer component

αc = F αLwhere αL is coefficient for liquid phase; F an enhancement factor

•• Nucleate boiling component

Treated similar to nucleate pool boiling heat transfer, accounting for the interaction with flow

Flow

Components of Flow Boiling

Typical variation of

α for fixed mass

flux

Quality

Heat Tra

nsfe

r C

oeff

icie

nt (W

/m2K

)

Nucleate boiling region

Decreasing q&

Convective Component

Two-phase convective heat transfer componentHere the heat transfer is through faster moving liquid

film being dragged by higher velocity vapour Favourable conditions

- Low pressure and low heat flux- High flow rate and high vapour quality- Plain surface

Flow

Nucleate Boiling Component

Nucleate boiling componentHere the heat transfer is driven by vapour bubble dynamics

Favourable conditions- High pressure and high heat flux

- Low flow rate and low vapour quality- Enhanced boiling surfaces

Two-phase Forced Convection

Heat transfer is through a thin liquid filmTemperature at vapour-liquid interface is Tsat

No bubble generationEvaporation occurs at vapour-liquid interface

Tsat

Tw

Flow

Liquid

VapourLiquid

Flow Boiling

• Convective heat transfer component

αc = F αLwhere αL is coefficient for liquid phase; F an enhancement factor

•• Nucleate boiling component

Treated similar to nucleate pool boiling heat transfer, accounting for the interaction with flow

Flow

Increasing vapour mass fraction

1/Xtt

Chen F factor

>

+

=

1.01

if 213.01

35.2

1.01

if 1

tt

736.0

tt

tt

XX

X

F

Chen Nucleate Boiling Component� αnb= Sαp where S is a suppression factor; αp , pool boiling coefficient is obtained from Forster-Zuber correlation

� Suppression factor, S, is related to a two-phase Reynolds number, ReTP

� ReTP = F1.25 Rel

∆Te, pool

∆Te, flow

Chen Suppression factor

• Suppesion factor for nucleate boiling

• Effect of flow on nucleate boiling

1.17

TF

6Re1053.21

1−

⋅+=S

• Overall correlation

α = FαL+Sαnb

Heterogeneous Nucleation

• Each departing bubble leaves small amount vapour at the cavity bottom

• This provides nucleation for subsequent bubble

• Thus the cycle of nucleation, bubble growth and departure continues

More Complex Shapes

• Vapour in these can sustain a degree of subcoolingwithout condensing

• Liquid flows down partially inside the cavities giving high coefficients associated with evaporation from very thin liquid film

Re-entrant

cavity

Doubly re-entrant

cavity

Enhancing Nucleate Boiling

• Large number of artificially made re-entrant /doubly re-entrant cavities

• These initiate and sustain nucleate boiling at low wall superheat

• These cavities need to be interconnected so that vapour can pass from one cavity to another

Tubes with Porous Metallic CoatingHigh flux tube - Porous coating of thin metallic matrix from fine metal particles

Random interconnected passages provide numerousnucleation sites

0.2 - 0.3

mm

� Different metal coatings are available on inside or outside tubes

� Dry-out could occur at lower vapour quality

Results with Composite Test-section

Composite test-section for in-tube boiling

Three parts of the test-sectionElectrical resistance heatingDetailed thermal measurements

Results with and without enhancement device can be directly compared for single phase and flow boiling heat transfer

Same mass fluxSame heat fluxNearly same pressure

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

0 1 2 3

Length (m)

Heat

tran

sfer c

oeff

icie

nt

(W/m

2K

) Pressure = 1.66 bar

Mass flux = 285 kg/m2s

Heat flux = 41 kW/m2

coated section plain section

Flow

coated section

High Flux Coating-Flow Boiling

Wire Loop Inserts- Single phase

0

10 00

20 00

30 00

0 1 2 3

Length (m)

Hea

t tr

an

sfer

coef

fici

ent

(W/m

2K

)

Pressure = 1.44 bar

M ass flux = 287 kg/m2s

Heat flux = 2.59 kW/m2

section with

wire insertssection with

wire insertsplain section

F low

Wire Loop Inserts- Single phase

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

0 1 2 3

Length (m)

Hea

t tr

an

sfer

coef

fici

ent

(W/m

2K

)

Pressure = 1.66 bar

Mass flux = 285 kg/m2s

Heat flux = 41 kW/m2

section with

wire inserts

section with

wire insertsplain section

Flow

• For in-tube boiling critical heat flux is related to dryout phenomenon in the annular flow region

• Dryout is influenced by entrained liquid

droplets in the vapour core

Flow Boiling and Critical Heat Flux Limit

Critical vapour quality associated with CHF

• Critical quality can be increased if entrained droplets are deposited on heating surface

• Entrained droplets can be deposited on heating surface if swirling motion is imparted to them

Flow Boiling and Critical Heat Flux Limit

• Swirl flow devices such as helical microfins, twisted tape inserts, etc can be used for this purpose


Recommended