+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Date post: 24-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: rafe-cox
View: 235 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
13
Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy
Transcript

Bomb Calorimeter LabMike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy

Purpose

• To see if modifications to bomb calorimeters would increase efficiency• Part I: Testing the calorimeters thermal

qualities of insulation and speed of heating• Part II: Seeing if modifications gave a

closer estimate of a fuel’s heat capacity.

The CalorimetersLeft to Right: Aluminum Insulated, Fiberglass Insulated, and Control

Temperature over Time

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120

10

20

30

40

50

60

ControlFiberAluminum

Thermal Testing

• Using a Bunsen Burner with a consistent flame, we tested how long it took for each calorimeter to reach 50° Celsius and how long before each began loosing heat over a period of 15 -20 minutes. • The Chart has been shortened to when the

most insulated began to loose heat.

Aluminum and Fiber Glass InstallationCalorimeters under construction

I – Butanol Lamp with Aluminum Insulated Canister

Thermal Energy to Heat Water

Fuel Control Fiberglass Aluminum

Methanol 4.598 kJ/g 4.598 kJ/g 4.18 kJ/g

Butural 5.016 kJ/g 5.434 kJ/g 4.18 kJ/g

Heat of Combustion

Fuel Ideal/ Expected Control Fiberglass Aluminum Foil

Methanol 64.09 kJ/g 11.495 kJ/g 11.495 kJ/g 13.934 kJ/g

Butural 75.87 kJ/g 16.72 kJ/g 18.113 kJ/g 13.934 kJ/g

Materials

• Three aluminum cans • A roll of tinfoil• Fiberglass insulation • i-butanol • Methanol • Two stoppers with wicks • Match book or lighter

• 3 very large soup cans • Glass thermometer • 6 stands with rings

attached • Stop watch • Tap water • Scale

Conclusion • We found that tinfoil was the best insulator for methanol and

the fiberglass was the best insulator for i-buterol. However neither were close to the ideal target energy output for their respective fuels. This can be attributed to the lack of ideal conditions in which to conduct the experiment.

• We found that the insulated bombcalorimeters took longer to reach 50 degrees C than the control. The Fiberglass insulator took the longest to heat to 50 C.

• Finally we found that both the tinfoil and the fiberglass insulators retained the heat longer than the control. The fiberglass insulator however was much more efficient than the tinfoil insulator. This fits because it also took longer to heat up to 50 C.

Equations and Ideal Data• Heat absorbed by the water (calories) = Mass of water (grams)

x Temperature change (oC) x 1.00 cal/g oC

• i-Butanol: 75.87 KJ/g• Methanol: 64.09 KJ/g

Single Bonds kJ/mol

H—C 416

C—C 356

C—O 336

O--H 467

Hypothesis

•Modifications to the bomb calorimeters will increase the speed of heating the water and the retention of the water’s heat.


Recommended