Date post: | 22-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | chastity-ray |
View: | 229 times |
Download: | 0 times |
BOT-2: Gross Motor
Bruininks-Oserentsky Test of Motor Proficiency- 2nd
Edition
Key characteristics Purpose
Evaluate proficiency of motor skills Support diagnoses, screening (short form),
educational placement (physical education), etc. Most widely used motor proficiency test
Age 4yrs -21yrs 11 months
Time Complete form= 40-60 minutes Short Form= 15-20 minutes
Cost Gross motor kit- $515.00
Gross motor
Gross Motor Domains
Gross motor composite total: 26 items Body coordination: motor skills used with balance & coordination of
the upper and lower extremities Strength & agility: large muscle strength, motor speed, and motor
skills for maintaining body position for walking and running
Procedures
Testing procedures Standardized test: administered & scored according to specific
procedures Gross motor should be performed in an area 60 feet long 12 feet wide Determine hand preference: set a tennis ball on the table and ask the
examinee to pick up the ball and throw to you. Foot preference: place tennis ball on floor and instruct the examinee
to kick the ball Within each subtest the entire item set should be administered
regardless of the child’s age
Procedures
• Administration procedures• Structured• Can teach the item using pictures, physical
demonstration, or verbal instruction• Establish rapport• Administrative options:
• Complete form: most reliable measure of overall motor proficiency
• Short form: quick and easy overall measure & also used to determine the need for further assessment
• Select composites & select subtest: can administer only subtests or composites that are relevant to the client’s need but the complete form should be used for qualifying a client for special-education services or diagnosis such as DCD
Examples of test items
Gross motor Body coordination
Bilateral coordination Jumping jacks, tapping foot and finger
Balance Walking forward on a line, standing on one leg on a
balance beam
Strength & Agility Running speed & agility
Shuttle run, one-legged side hop Strength
Standing long jump, sit-ups, push-ups
Standardization
Sample: N=1520 12 groups of 4-21 year olds Sample tested in 239 sites within
38 states Based on the Current Population
Survey (Bureau of the Census, 2001) & the Twenty-sixth Annual Report to Congress (U.S. Department of Education, 2004)
Sampling goal to match US population: Sex Race/ethnicity (closely matched US
population) Socioeconomic status Geographic region
•Scores identify motor-skill deficits in individuals with mild to moderate motor control problems
Development
Started out as the BOTMP in 1978
2002 product survey identified less effective items within the test
New content focused on improving measurement among 4 & 5 year olds, and expanding coverage of fine and gross motor skills
Secondary goal Subtest more homogenous collection of activities
2005 final publication of the BOT-2
Psychometric Properties
Internal consistency
Test-retestReliability
Interrater Reliability
Domains (0.86-0.92)
Test-retest study N=134
Interrater reliability: Manual coordination, body coordination, and strength & agility 0.98-0.99
Sub-domains (0.77-0.86)
Mean re-test interval 7-42 days
Fine motor: 0.92
Total BOT-2 Score (0.95-0.96)
Age 4-7=0.81Age 8-12=0.80Age 13-21= 0.75
Psychometric Properties Continued
Validity
Content Validated through logical & empirical procedures that were used to select items during development
Construct Used a composite structure that distinguishes motor skills by limbs and musculature involved in relationship to functional activities in areas of postural control, locomotion, and object manipulation
Clinical group difference Supports diagnosis of motor performance deficits
Criterion BOTMP, PDMS-2, TVMS-R
Scoring & Recording
Results
Converting raw scores to point scores
Compute subtest total point scores
Convert scale scores to composite standard scores
Interpretation
•Well below average•Below average•Average•Above average •Well above average
Test characteristics
Areas of occupation Education (physical education) Play
Assessment approach Bottom-up approach
Frame of Reference Developmental
Where would this tool be used?
Private practice
School system Performed in a gymnasium
Area should be 60 feet long and 12 feet wide, low distractions
Measurement concerns
Normative data did not represent for populations outside of the US
Cost: Complete form test kit= $837.00
Area, size, requirements, special equipment
Examinee dependent
Assessment time