www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 414
ARCHITECTURE OF MARAGHEH TOMBS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON ANATOLIA
Mohammad Reza Ghari Heidari 1* and Haldun Ozkan 2 1 Islamic Azad University, Shabestar Branch, Shabestar, Iran
2 Ataturk University, Turkey.
*(Corresponding author - Email: [email protected])
ABSTRACT Understanding the origin and history of architecture has gone through different stages in various cultures and
communities that knowing it generally or specifically in an area with certain style and culture requires to be familiar
with this history. Disparate differences and similarities of architecture, different architectural styles, invented and
transformed practices and the growing trend of architecture in recent years all are the requirements that can be
resolved partially by a hint to architecture understating and give us the vision of what people and communities have
made throughout history. Maragheh city in northern Iran, Azerbaijan has unique features that is perhaps one of the
cities which has influenced its own subsequent architecture and art. The architecture of tombs in this city- including
Red Dome (Gonbad-e Sorkh), Circular Dome (Gonbad-e Modavar), Azure Dome (Gonbad-e Kabood), Green
Tower (Goy Borj) and Qafariyeh are very unique and have had many influences on the subsequent tomb
architecture of Anatolia. Anatolia region inspired by the architecture of Seljuk Turks in plan, materials, components
and decoration has modeled Maragheh region. This architecture is investigated in this study.
KEYWORDS: Maragheh, Architecture History, Culture, Anatolia, Tomb
INTRODUCTION There are many cities in the world in terms of historical transition that brought many changes and evolutions in the life
and religious beliefs of their own people. Among others, it can be referred to the old cities of Greek, Chinese, Romans,
Persians and Egyptians. One of these cities which have a very rich history and cultural background is located in the
northwest of Iran, called Maragheh city. Maragheh had been one of the major cities in the Seljuk and Ilkhanate period.
As much as it was selected as the summer capital city during the reign of Hulagu Khan Mongol (grandson of Genghis
Khan). During this period, very beautiful and lasting monuments were built. Among them, it can be referred to
Maragheh’s domes and observatory. Many tombs were built during the Seljuk and Ilkhanate dynasty which in turn
were both influenced by other monuments and influenced on other buildings in later periods. In this study, we tried to
investigate domes located in Maragheh city and their impact on Anatolia done as well as their similarities and
differences. The study includes the type of their architecture, history, decoration and parts. Maragheh City is one of the
oldest cities of Iran, which is placed in the northwest of the country. It is located in Azerbaijan on the east coast of
Urmia Lake and the southern slope of Sahand Mountain. The importance of this city: the status of the city can be
viewed from three perspectives:
1) Maragheh in the field of scientific astronomy In the past, Maragheh was of great importance to develop astronomy among Islamic cities. In this city, the world’s
greatest observatory was built before the invention of telescopes by the command of Hulagu Khan and through the
hands of Khaje Nasir al-Din Tusi. This observatory became the model for many later observatories and also it was as a
broad scientific organization in which many sciences were taught.
2) Maragheh as a Cultural and historical center: During Abbasid Caliphate, this city was belonged to one of the girls of Harun al-Rashid. It became as the territory of
Seljuk at 464 AH and Sultan Jalal al-Din Khwarazmshah entered there at 622 AH. Mongols took the control of this
city in 628 AH, and finally it was chosen as the capital city of Ilkhanate at 656 AH during Hulagu Khan Time, which
turned into the developmental center of civilization (Varjavand, 2005; p. 109).
3) The origin of Islamic Iranian architecture and art: Being the origin of civilization and art is another characteristic of Maragheh. This city holds a great number of
architectural art pieces before and after Islam. The existence of Gowijeh Qaleh, Mehr Temple, Observatory of Havanes
Church, Sorkh and Kabood dome towers which are signs of different cultures and beliefs prove this issue.
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 415
Evolution of Tombs in the course of Islam: After the death of Holy Prophet Mohammad who ordered his followers to make the graves very simple and without any
ceremony and commanded that all graves to be at the ground level and prevented to make his own grave distinct and
different from the other graves, and this is manifested in the Verse 55 of twentieth Surah “TA-HA”. This trend was
continued till the time of first Walid of Umayyad caliphate (86-705 AH) who created changes in Prophet Tomb and
made it a more respectful place (Hillenbrand, 2010; p. 253). In two next centuries, when the companions, followers and
higher authorities were died and put into the grave, a covering or tent and wooden structure was used upon it which was
an attribute of common graves in other cultures. These canopies were an interpretation of Quran that was regarded as
one of the heaven blessings. Gradually, these tents and canopies changed into magnificent monuments which later were
known as canopied graves. Then, interpreting that these tombs should not be subjected into wind and rain, it was
permitted to make a canopy upon it and later a Mihrab was added to it which became the place for prayer and worship.
Iran and its tombs It should be noted that in pre-Islamic period of Iran there was not any significant signs of tomb to be built
independently. But the magnificent mausoleum of Cyrus in Pasargadae is an exception. Achaemenid kings were placed
in decorative chambers next to rocks and mountains. Also, no tomb was built in burial ceremonies of Parties. And
Sassanid had Zoroastrian religion who threw away the dead bodies to avoid deadly spirit infection of the dead bodies;
while the bodies were caught by vultures and carnivorous animals. So, it is clear that after the arrival of Arabs to Iran,
there weren’t any kind of inspiration source as a model to build later tombs for Muslims.
The origins of tombs in Iran can be fit into two theories. The first, the impact of Palmyra Roman tombs which were
related to the early Christian cities, as well as Byzantine Martyrium. The second, the impact of Turkish nomadic people
who built hill-like graves in their own culture and buried the dead there. In addition, tombs can have geographical
origin, in the course of pre-Islamic period people of East and Middle Asia held magnificent and complex ceremonies
during burial, so they built graves in the form of massive sites with durable materials which were surrounded by a
circular walls or were placed on a raised platform. Dead body was placed in a burial tent along with those who mourn
around, and then it was buried in a burial hill known as “Kurgan”. Tomb towers which included the burial crypts
contained dead body and there was an empty room on it which was interpreted as architectural mixture of these burial
methods. Even decoration of nomadic tents surprisingly had many similarities with that of Iranian tombs (Hillenbrand,
2010).
Iranian tombs can be divided into two parts in terms of their function:
1) Religious shrines as Shiite tombs had religious and political importance and position of Imams. The
construction of these tombs was rooted in the religious belief of people as the tomb of Imam Reza in Mashhad,
Iran.
2)
2) Non-religious tombs that were built by National and sometimes army leaders were actually a monument. It was
likely that this type of tombs lose their own survival (Kiyani, 2009; p. 10) due to the less attention of later generations,
like Maragha’s Goy Borj which is completely destroyed now. Of course, we can say that the tombs and their function
was changed with the arrival of Turks, some of which were the focus of pilgrimage and public beliefs that its root can
be searched in personal salvation through the intercession of a saint or a sacred event as well as the efforts of people,
unions and organizations for mysticism in order to close to one of authorities. Therefore, by this explanation, we can
divide the physical construction of building (architecture) in Iran into two groups:
A) Domed square; Which have two roots, one of its common types are Sassanid fire temples and the other four arches that their square
plan have four disruption in two intersecting axis with a dome covering them. This type of plan at the time of Islam
conquests is seen frequently which can be a model for the architecture of tombs. This type of architecture in Iran was
changed into domed octagonal structure later (Figure 1).
B) Tower tomb:
The origin of this type of tomb is Turkish tents of Sabeain temples and Chinese guard towers. It is likely that the reason
to build this type of toms in Iran is their great simplicity that it is notable in the first samples of this building. These
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 416
types of buildings were then commonly constructed in Iran. The shape of this tomb is lofty cylinder with cone or dome-
shaped roof, which was gradually changed and turned into octagonal, decagon and dodecagonn and star back
(Hillenbrand, 2010; p. 280) (Figure 2).
Figure 1. Haruniye Dome – Khorasan Province, Iran
Figure 2. Twin Towers of Kharraqan- Qazvin Province, Iran
Also, a third group of these tombs could be stated, known as “Old Tombs” due to their architecture and authenticity.
This group of tombs are located in the North West of Iran in Azerbaijan which are Red Dome (Gonbad-e Sorkh), Azure
Dome (Gonbad-e Kabood) and etc. These tombs are in various forms of square, circular, polygonal and others which
are more derived from tower than canopy (Grabar, 2011; p. 384) (Figure 3). All of these tombs have a cellar and their
former façade is different in terms of shape and decoration range, while the name of their creators is mentioned in their
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 417
formal inscription. One of innovations then was their pre-arch which was as a high and superficial gateway that created
a unique facade for the building.
Architecture of Anatolia tombs The architecture of Anatolia was started by the arrival of Turks to this region. These nations were known as Anatolian
Seljuk that their tombs were influenced by Byzantine architecture or Martyria (their shapes were square polygon - star,
etc.). Recent researches indicate that the architecture of Anatolia Seljuk has not been a branch of Great Seljuk Empire
architecture, but it was a new combination of Turkish-Islamic culture (Grabar, 2009; p. 323) and had the characteristics
of doomed and tower tombs.
Tombs and shrines of Maragheh:
These domes chronically are as follows: Red Dome (Gonbad-e Sorkh) (543 AH), Circular Tower (Borj-e Modavar)
(563 AH), Azure Dome (Gonbad-e Kabood) (582-656 AH), Qafariyeh Dome (Gunbad-e Qafariyeh) (725-828 AH) and
Azure Tower (Goy Borj) (second half of the eight century) that each of them has a special ornament and architecture
reflecting the culture, civilization, arts and beliefs of people in their time. Their architectural shapes are square, circular
or polygon. The tombs of Maragheh can be compared with that of Anatolia and examine their influences and changes
one by one. In general, it could be stated that the construction of tombs in Iran is related to 11-12 AD centuries, and in
Anatolia to 12-13 AD centuries, that in this regard there are differences and similarities between them.
Many researchers have praised the tombs of Maragheh. Among others, it can be referred to Pope who writes that these
tombs have very intriguing visual arts and their brickwork and decorations are at the highest level (Pope, 2003; p. 145).
Now, some of these differences and similarities are pointed out.
Figure 3: Circular Tower (Borj-e Modavar) and Azure Dome (Gonbad-e Kabood) – Maragheh, East Azerbaijan
Province, Iran
MATERIAL AND METHODS
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 418
Materials used in Maragheh tombs are only brick, while brick and stone are mostly used in Anatolia region.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Plans: In terms of plan, it can be stated that tombs in Maragha are in polygon, square or circular shape which are as equal as
Anatolia tombs. We can name Emir Saltuk Tomb in Erzurum (13th
AD century) in Anatolia which is octagonal, and
Azure Dome (Gonbad-e Kabood) in Maragheh. Also, Najm al-din Dome (1222 AD) in Anatolia which is foursquare
and Qafariyeh Dome (Gunbad-e Qafariyeh) in Maragheh city (Figures 4).
Figure 4-1. Emir Saltuk Tomb in Erzurum Province, Turkey
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 419
Figure 4-2: Azure Dome (Gonbad-e Kabood) in Maragheh, Iran
Size: Maragheh tombs are as single individual tombs and memorial buildings that their height has been important as Azure
Dome (Gonbad-e Kabood) which has a short base and prolongs in the same direction to the dome, whereas this impact
on Anatolia is seen in Malek Ghazi tomb (in Niksar – 1250 AD) which is made of stone placed on a stand circularly.
The same impact could also be seen in Anonim tomb in Erzurum which belongs to the 13th
century (Figures 5).
Location: Maragheh tomb are as isolated single buildings, while this effect is not seen in Anatolia, but they are built in the margin
or attached to the main building. For example, within mosques there are hospitals and schools such as Twin- Tower
School (Cift Minare Madrese) in Erzurum and Jaja Bey Madrasa-si in Gir Shahir and etc... (Figures 6)
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 420
Figure 5-1: Azure Dome (Gonbad-e Kabood) in Maragheh, Iran
Figure 5-2: Malek Ghazi tomb in Niksar, Turkey
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 421
Figure 5-3: Anonim tomb in Erzurum Province, Turkey
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 422
Figure 6: Twin- Tower School (Cift Minare Madrese) in Erzurum Province, Turkey
Coverage: The coverage of tombs in Maragheh has two layer that the inner coverage in short. The same covers can be seen in
Anatolia.
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 423
Facade Entrance: The facade entrance of Maragheh tombs is close to the ground like Red Dome (Gonbad-e Sorkh) which enters into
tomb with short steps. These facade entrances are simple in terms of decoration, while the effects on Anatolia is on
stone decorations. Also, the decorations of entrances in Maragheh are seen each period after Seljuk dynasty in
Ilkhanate’s period in Qafariyeh Dome (Gunbad-e Qafariyeh).
Ornaments and Decorations: In general, Iranian and Maragheh tombs have brick ornaments decorated by Kufic Calligraphy, like the façade entrance
of Red Dome (Gonbad-e Sorkh) and Azure Dome (Gonbad-e Kabood) that ceramic turquoise is used and plaster reliefs
are visible within the tomb. But the tombs of Anatolia are decorated with simple stone reliefs while sharp arches and
stone materials are used from outside for decorations. As Twin- Tower School (Cift Minare Madrese) which has
surface decorations. Also, considering Anatolia tombs in cemetery part, there are stone reliefs which are taken from
Shamanism beliefs in Central Asia. Some of these designs are related to the life tree, two head eagle and lion-couple,
while these types of designs are not seen in Maragheh. (Figures 7).
Figure 7-1: Red Dome (Gonbad-e Sorkh) in Maragheh, Iran
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 424
Figure 7-2: Azure Dome (Gonbad-e Kabood) in Maragheh, Iran
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 425
Figure 7-3: Yakutiye School in Erzurum Province, Turkey
Porcelain tiles: In Anatolia tombs, porcelain tiles are used inside and outside as Kaykaus’s Hoapital (Dar al-shifa) in Sivas (1220), in
which ceramic is used. While in Iran, both porcelain tiles as well as ceramics and mosaic are used inside the tombs. In
addition, the use of porcelain tile decorations in Maragheh can be seen in the tombs of Ilkhanate dynasty as Qafariyeh
Dome (Gunbad-e Qafariyeh (36-1316) (Figures 8).
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 426
Figure 8-1: Azure Dome (Gonbad-e Kabood) in Maragheh, Iran
Figure 8-2: Qafariyeh Dome (Gunbad-e Qafariyeh) in Maragheh, Iran
Interior spaces:
The interior spaces of Maragheh tombs are more magnificent in comparison with Anatolia tombs, the use of arches and
trompe which is seen in Maragheh’s Red Dome (Gonbad-e Sorkh) is derived from the beautiful interior design which is
not seen in Anatolia tombs (Figure 9).
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 427
Figure 9: Red Dome (Gonbad-e Sorkh) in Maragheh, Iran
Mihrab
Unlike Maragheh tombs which lack Mihrab, in Anatolia tombs Mihrab has decorations and in most of them is in the
form of Stalactite aaltar. For instance, the tomb of Alim Oghlu in Ahlat which is in the shape of open window, and
Anonim tomb in Erzurum could be named. (Figure 10).
Cellar
There is cellar in all of Maragheh tombs. It is where dead body is placed. In Maragheh tombs, the lighting of this part is
very important. Cellar has a cross-shaped plan with brick ornaments, like Azure Dome (Gonbad-e Kabood). The only
difference in the tombs of both areas is that in some tombs of Anatolia as Aksaray dead bodies are mummified while in
Maragheh there is no mummification. This issue can be investigated.
Coffin The reason that there is no shrine in Maragheh tombs, lessens the presence of coffin and just the stones placed around
can confirm the presence of coffin that existed before. Reversely, in Anatolia this part of tomb is made of porcelain
material as the tomb of Kaykaus’s Hoapital (Dar al-shifa) in Sivas and Mawlana tomb in Konya. It should be noted that
the coffins made of porcelain material is sometimes seen in Ilkhanate period.
CONCLUSION According to the investigations, it can be stated that the effects of building tombs in Maragheh region that their
construction dates back to the periods of Seljuk and Ilkhanid dynasty is an imported product from central Asia that their
bodies has been as kurgan, while in Anatolia, building tombs is not only affected by this issue, but also by the tombs of
Byzantine Martyrium. It can also be noted that the climate of region is another factor affected the buildings of tombs,
so that the tombs in Anatolia region are made of more durable materials, mainly rock, due to the cold weather, while
tombs in Maragheh are wholly made of brick. Also it can be inferred that since the builders of tombs both in Maragheh
and Anatolia were Turk, so that there are many similarities in many aspects including existence of cellar, similar plans,
www.sciencejournal.in
Volume- 4 Issue- 4 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved. 428
existence of inscription and decorations etc. Also, the tombs in Maragheh are built as single individual buildings, while
in Anatolia this has been changed into some part of the building like the tombs attached to school, mosque and hospital.
In addition, it can be noted that in Anatolia region, dead bodies are mummified and placed in cellar which can have
roots in pre-Islamic tradition. Finally, according to the construction of Iran and Maragheh’s tombs in 11-12th
centuries
and the construction of Anatolia tombs in 12-13th
centuries, this effect can be high and also the number of tombs in the
light of their lateness is from Azerbaijan and Iran. They have different decorative effects compared to each other, one
(Maragheh) has Iranian - Turkish effects and in Anatolia these aspects are Turkish, Byzantine and Armenian effects.
Figure 10: Mihrab of Anonim tomb in Erzurum Province, Turkey
REFERENCES
Arik, D. (1969). Erkan Derir Anadolu Turk mimarisinde Turbeler bicimleri 1969 Ankaro
Carangh, A. (1971). Maragha buildings and monuments. Tabriz, Education and Development.
Gönül Ö. (1974). İran ve Anadolu Selçuklu Türbelerinin Mukayesesi.
Grabar, O. (2009). Islamic Art and Architecture. In Gheytasi, A. Trans., Tehran, Nashr-e Sureh Mehr Press.
Grabar, O. (2009). Islamic Art and Architecture. In Ajand, Y Trans., Tehran, SAMT press.
Halenbrand, R. (2010). Islamic architecture. In Ayatollah Rah-e Shirazi, B. Trans, Tehran, Rozbeh press.
Kiani, M. Y (2009). The history of art and architecture of Iran. Tehran, SAMT press.
Onge,Y. (1995). Ahlat'da XIII y.y nakislaryla sus bir eser. Bogatay Ak-Sirin Hatun Kumbetti, Onsaya eild 6. Sayi 72.
Pope, A., (2003). Iranian architecture. In Sadri Afshar, G. Trans., Tehran, Azadeh press. p. 145.
Varjavand, P. (2005). Exploring Maragheh Observatory, Tehran, Amir Kabir.