+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program Historical Perspective

Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program Historical Perspective

Date post: 09-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: cathy
View: 38 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program Historical Perspective. Mitchell Palmer, DVM, PhD and W. Ray Waters, DVM, PhD National Animal Disease Center USDA, ARS Mark S. Camacho, DVM, MPH Regional Epidemiologist USDA, APHIS, Veterinary Services. Tuberculosis- Ancient Origins. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
47
Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program Historical Perspective Mitchell Palmer, DVM, PhD and W. Ray Waters, DVM, PhD National Animal Disease Center USDA, ARS Mark S. Camacho, DVM, MPH Regional Epidemiologist USDA, APHIS, Veterinary Services
Transcript
Page 1: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program

Historical Perspective

Mitchell Palmer, DVM, PhD and W. Ray Waters, DVM, PhDNational Animal Disease Center

USDA, ARS

Mark S. Camacho, DVM, MPHRegional Epidemiologist

USDA, APHIS, Veterinary Services

Page 2: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 2

Tuberculosis- Ancient Origins

Page 3: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 3

Ancient history of tuberculosis

The earliest detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is in the remains of bison dated 18,000 years before the present.

Skeletal remains show prehistoric humans (4000 BC) had TB, and tubercular decay has been found in the spines of mummies from 3000–2400 BC.

Source: Wikipedia

Page 4: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 4

Ancient History of Tuberculosis

“Phthisis” (wasting away) is a Greek term for tuberculosis; around 460 BC, Hippocrates identified phthisis as the most widespread disease of the times involving coughing up blood and fever, which was almost always fatal.-

Hippocrates (460-370 BC)

“Why when one comes near consumptives… does one contract their disease…the reason is that the breath is bad and heavy…one breathes this pernicious air and takes in the disease because there is in the air something disease producing.” Aristotle (384-322 BC)

Page 5: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 5

“Consumption” and “White Plague”

Disease appears to “consume” it’s victims… causing them to waste away.

Tuberculous patients appear pale.

Page 6: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 6

Human Tuberculosis- The Numbers

19th Century- 20% of all human deaths were caused by tuberculosis.

21st Century- 2 billion infected worldwide.

Annually: 8-9 million new cases, 1.5 million die.

10-15 thousand cases/yr in the US.

Most cases are due to “reactivation”.

Page 7: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Disease of Poverty

04/21/23 7

Country All Cases Per 100,000

India 2,200,000 189

China 1,000,000 75

South Africa 500,000 993

Cambodia 61,000 424

Indonesia 450,000 187

Pakistan 410,000 231

Bangladesh 340,000 225

Ethiopia 220,000 258

Europe 380,000 42

United States 9,951 3.2

Global total 8,700,000 125

Uncommon in wealthy western countries today.

Still rampant in the world’s poorest countries.

Page 8: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Bovine Tuberculosis

“There is scarcely a subject related to agriculture or public health that has occasioned as much or as bitter discussion, or has led to the expression of so many divergent views as this one of tuberculosis in cattle.” Leonard Pearson (1905)

04/21/23 8

Page 9: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 9

Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex

M. tuberculosis

M. canetti

M. africanum

M. pinnipedii

M. bovis Broadest host range

M. bovis and M. tuberculosis shared a common ancestor

Page 10: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 10

Bovine Tuberculosis- The Numbers

Pigs, goats, sheep, camelids, horses, sheep, dogs, cats. Livestock worldwide (cattle, Asiatic water buffalo).

69% of countries in tropics. 80% of countries in Africa. One of the most important livestock diseases in China.

Estimate 1 billion cattle worldwide with 50 million infected. 1/3 live in regions where bovine TB is controlled. 1/3 live in areas where disease is

widespread but prevalence unknown. 1/3 live in areas of high prevalence

Page 11: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 11

Discovery

Human vs Bovine Tuberculosis

Robert Koch’s Assumptions

Page 12: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 12

Koch’s Mistake- Mycobacterium bovis

1882, Robert Koch mistakenly stated that tubercle bacilli from humans and cattle were the same.

1901, Koch said that there were differences between the bacilli …but there was little danger of transmission from the bovine bacillus to man.

1905- Nobel Prize, “Bovine tuberculosis is not transmissible to man.”

1908, Stated that bovine infection could be transmitted to humans, but it would be “wrong to place the combat of bovine tuberculosis above that of human tuberculosis.”

Page 13: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Mycobacterium bovis

1865- Jean-Antoine Villemin- transfer of material from humans or cattle to rabbits.

Not a spontaneous disease

Tuberculosis infectious, the effect of “some contagious agent.”

Moved “consumption” to “tuberculosis”

1885- Auguste Chauveau- cattle-to-cattle transmission through ingestion. In man and cattle transmission through

consumption of milk and meat was possible.

1898- Theobald Smith distinguishes M. bovis from M. tuberculosis.

Smith

Villemin

Chauveau

Smith

Page 14: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Mycobacterium bovis

1901- John McFadyean and Royal Commission on Tuberculosis conducts research.

1911- Royal Commission on tuberculosis “Man must therefore be added to the

list of animals notably susceptible to bovine tubercle bacilli.”

Proposed test and slaughter.

McFadyean

Page 15: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Robert Koch

British, American, German Commissions formed.

Koch countered by McFadyean, Bang, Ravenel, Salmon, Lister, Virchow, Smith, Nocard.

Koch’s declarations emboldened special interest groups and political opposition to eradication.

Koch’s influence carried the discussion into the 1930s long after science had settled on the issue.

Not officially M. bovis until 1970

04/21/23 15

Page 16: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Zoonotic Potential

As early as 1885 growing demand by public health officials for safe meat and milk.

M. bovis responsible for up to 25% of human tuberculosis, especially in children.

At the same time, 2/3 of all condemned US beef carcasses were for “tuberculous meat”.

Motivation for:

1) Mandatory pasteurization

2) Bovine TB eradication program

Page 17: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Why a bovine tuberculosis program?

Public Health Concerns 25% of human cases Easily transmitted through unpasteurized

milk Carcass condemnation

Most common cause for condemnation Rising rates of condemnation

Europe more severely affected showing where uncontrolled disease might lead

04/21/23 17

Page 18: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 18

Tuberculin: The Foundation for

an Eradication Campaign

Page 19: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Tuberculin Testing

1890- Koch develops tuberculin. Fails as treatment but veterinarians recognized the potential as a diagnostic aid.

Veterinarians (Gutmann and Bang) begin using it to diagnose bovine tuberculosis.

1892- Leonard Pearson (age 24) travels to Koch’s lab and brings tuberculin to Pennsylvania for first cattle skin tests.

Preventative Treatment

Koch’s lymph Paratoloid Tuberculin

Pearson

Page 20: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

First tuberculin tests in USJersey cattle owned by Joseph Gillingham, Clairmont Farms, Villa Nova, PA- Trustee of University

Much attention and criticism Dr. Samuel Dixon- Academy of Natural Science in Philadelphia-

called Gillingham a fool and Pearson a dreamer Dr. W.L. Zuill- professor of veterinary surgery-headed a commission

to discredit tuberculin’s diagnostic properties SC administration and monitor body temperature 51 of 79 showed positive reactions.

Necropsies began on farm- continued at University

Producers, veterinarians, physicians, reporters

All 51 had gross lesions

Pearson to Gillingham- “..his sacrifice would come to be a blessing to every cattleman in the US.”

04/21/23 20

Page 21: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Tuberculin Testing

Voluntary, at the farmer’s expense, no indemnity, carcasses buried.

Pearson’s plan- reactors appraised, postmortems under official supervision, meat salvaged.

Public education- on-farm necropsies drew large crowds.

Page 22: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Tuberculin Testing- Challenges

1892-1915: Testing methods varied

Subcutaneous

Intrapalpebral

Intradermal

No standard tuberculin

1908- human intradermal test used

1921- intradermal the official method used by the USDA Bureau of Animal Industry (BAI)

Rumors, fears, misconceptions

Inaccurate, harmful, milk shortages

Page 23: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Tuberculin Testing- Challenges

1925- Iowa Supreme Court

“Pitchfork Brigade”

Iowa “Cow War”

1931- Tipton IA, (Cedar County)

Hundreds of farmers opposed to testing

State Vets threatened

Governor Daniel Turner imposed martial law and called in the National Guard

Martial law lasted 2 months

Page 24: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Iowa “Cow War” Characters

William Butterbrodt- West Branch, IA “If there is no resistance there will be no trouble”

Arrested for stampeding cattle

Jake Lenker- Chased off officers and vets

Iowa Farmer’s Protective Association

1000 National Guard Troops and State Veterinarian

Norman Baker KTNT “The naked truth”

Cancer clinic, hypnotist, mail order artist

Page 25: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 25

Page 26: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Tuberculin Testing- Challenges

Interval to retest was unknown-desensitization

BAI recommendations to retest varied from 7 to 60 days

Potential for fraud

“cow massaging” and “plugging the test”

Inducing inflammation

Page 27: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Tuberculin Testing“Tuberculous Cattle Trust”

“Tuberculous Cattle Trust” James Dorsey of Gilberts, IL

20,000 cows/yr- ~50% tuberculous

“plugging the test”

Over 10-year period 10,000 new foci of infection across US, Canada and Mexico

1914- 12 states ban cattle from IL, unless tested by federal veterinarians

1915- Dorsey indicted, sentenced to 8 yrs Pardoned by Pres. Woodrow Wilson after 4 yrs.

Estimated responsible for thousands of human cases compared to “Typhoid Mary” responsible for 47 cases

Page 28: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Methods of Control- Controversy

Bang’s Method- control without slaughter Segregation in to 2 herds (reactors/non-reactors)

Herds housed and controlled separately

Calves removed at birth, colostrum/milk pasteurized

Slaughter from infected herd done under inspection

Monitor non-reactor herd

Popular in Europe, not in US

Costly, poor public acceptance

Test and Remove Indemnity, use of milk/meat, quarantine

Disposition of infected cattle - 1906 law- burning or burying diseased cattle

In reality infected portions trimmed or sent to far away plants for slaughter

Page 29: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Methods of Control- Controversy

Robert Von Ostertag- “Father of Veterinary Meat Inspection” Remove only animals with “open” lesions and

track visibly infected animals.

Manchester Plan (English)

Periodic testing of milk for bacilli and trace back to herd of origin.

French- relied on BCG vaccination.

Page 30: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Methods of Control- Lack of Uniformity

1904- 24 states with tuberculin test barriers

Variability in timing, stringency, etc.

Different approaches in different jurisdictions without consultation or cooperation

Need for uniformity

“It does not require any extended argument to convince us that the question to be discussed is necessity for some uniformity…let regulations be drawn up by the Bureau of Animal Industry”

S.H. Ward (MN State Vet)

Page 31: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

US Bureau of Animal Industry

1883- Veterinary Division in USDA

1884- BAI created by congressional mandate.

“…prevent the exportation of diseased cattle, and to provide means for the suppression and extirpation of bovine pleuropneumonia and other contagious diseases.”

Daniel E. Salmon- 1st Director

Success with pleuropneumonia and FMD

BAI had power to condemn animals capable of spreading disease across state lines.

1893- First official skin test by Dr. E.C. Shroeder (15/34 reactions, 13/15 lesions)

1900- tuberculin testing required on all imported cattle

04/21/23 31

Daniel E. Salmon

Page 32: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

BAI- Noteworthy Research

Capable forward thinking scientists

Fred Kilborne, Cooper Curtice and Smith discovered (Babesia bigemina) cause of Texas Fever

Salmonella

Tuberculosis

1906 Pathology Division

Alonzo D. Melvin- Chief

Test and removal method

Herds in MD, VA, DC tested annually for 12 years. 17,000 tests, prevalence decreased 19% to 0.17%

04/21/23 32

Smith Moore

Kilborne

Curtice

Page 33: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

BAI- Noteworthy Research

Differentiation of human and bovine tubercle bacilli.

Differential virulence of the bovine and human bacilli in cattle.

Morphological and biochemical differences in cultures of human and bovine tubercle bacilli.

Transmissibility of bovine tubercle bacilli from cattle to swine.

Immunization of cattle with BCG.

Tuberculin potency testing.

Alternative routes of tuberculin administration.

Use of test and remove method of tuberculosis control.

04/21/23 33

Moore

Page 34: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 34

Eradication Program States Led Way

Pennsylvania first state to establish program (voluntary) 2 M cattle, prevalence 2-3%

Some herds with 30% to 100% infected.

1895- PA State Livestock Sanitary Board formed $40,000/yr- TB, anthrax, glanders, rabies

Option of Test/Remove with Indemnity or Bang’s Method

PA manufactured tuberculin and anthrax vaccine

1898- mandatory testing 1899- 33,000 cattle tested

13.7% positive

$102,909 indemnity payments ($22.56/head)

Page 35: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 35

Eradication Program States Led Way

Massachusetts

Different laws passed in 1892, 1894, 1895, and 1896 led to confusion.

State Legislature passed a law restricting the use of tuberculin to confirmation of a diagnosis made by physical exam.

Prevented widespread and systematic testing.

Neighboring Maine refused cattle deemed TB-free by physical exam only.

Page 36: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 36

US Livestock Sanitary Association 1894- 8 state officials and the BAI recommended formation of

US Livestock Sanitary Association. 1897- 1st meeting in Ft. Worth, TX. State and territorial sanitary officials, veterinarians and 5

delegates named by Sec of Ag 1899- TB surpassed Texas Fever Resolution- TB is contagious and spreading, tuberculin was the

best means of diagnosis, states and BAI should authorize methods of control.

1904- Committee on Tuberculosis formed. Deal vigorously with TB, determine the reliability of tuberculin

test, determine methods of carcass disposal, define rules governing interstate movement of cattle.

Dr. Salmon pledged BAI would follow recommendations of Sanitary Association.

Page 37: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 37

Accredited Herds

Committee of 5 state and federal veterinarians and 5 representatives from livestock breeder associations.

1917- Unanimously adopted by Sanitary Association.

Accredited herds- Receive certificate valid for 1 yr

Certificate declared the herd had been TB free for at least 2 yrs

Cattle could be shipped interstate with no further testing.

Producers agreed to regular tuberculin testing and complete/accurate animal identification records.

1927: >96,000 accredited herds, comprising 1.5 M cattle, another 1.3 M having had one TB-free test.

Page 38: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 38

Accredited Herds

BAI- Director Melvin obtained $75,000 ($1.27M) from congress in 1917 to create the Tuberculosis Eradication Division.

Headed by John A. Kiernan (TN State Vet)

1917- 1st Uniform Methods and Rules approved.

60 days after approval- 1st herd accredited

US Soldiers Home in Washington, DC.

1918- Accredited Veterinarian Program

By end of 1920: >5500 accredited vets

1921- Eradication offices in 46 states.

Page 39: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 39

Accredited vets get to work

1901- >200,000 cattle tested

prevalence 3.9% to 100% depending on region.

1917 to 1941- 25M cattle tested.

prevalence decreased 4.9% to 0.3%.

1917- Henry A. Wallace

eradication of bovine TB is “an impossible undertaking”

1941- USDA Secretary of Ag- Claude R. Wickard

“the US is now practically free of bovine tuberculosis”

1941- Every county <0.5% prevalence

23-year cost- $200M taxpayer costs plus cost to farmers

Page 40: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Eradication Campaign 1917-1940

232 million tuberculin skin tests given. 3.8 million cattle destroyed

Cattle population average of 66.4 million

Every county in the US modified accredited (< 0.5% prevalence).

Economic benefits exceeded costs 10:1. Human M. bovis infection a rarity.

04/21/23 40

Page 41: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

1917-1959 individual animal testing (area testing).

Since 1959 focused on slaughter surveillance.

04/21/23 41

Page 42: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Economic- Benefits

1917-1962: annual benefits $98.7 million

Net annual benefits $159 million

Decreased cattle lost from 100,000 to <30/yr

Saves $150M in replacement costs.

04/21/23 42

Page 43: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Benefits- Public Health

Eradication plus pasteurization prevented >25,000 deaths.

Mortality from 150/100,000 in 1918 to <50/100,000 in 1942

<5/100,000 since introduction of streptomycin, isoniazid in the 1940’s and 1950s, <5/10,000 by 1980.

04/21/23 43

Page 44: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Economic- Costs

1917-1992: actual cost $538M

255M federal, 283M state

Current program costs 3.5-4M/yr

04/21/23 44

Page 45: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Obstacles to Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication

Importation of infected cattle Need for rapid, reliable and inexpensive test to be

used at border crossings. Inability to Test and Remove Cattle

Need for reliable, accurate diagnostic tests to remove infected cattle without whole herd depopulation.

Wildlife Reservoirs Need for vaccines for wildlife.

Safe vaccines Vaccine delivery systems

Need for vaccines for cattle. Infected vs Vaccinated

04/21/23 45

Page 46: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

Obstacles to Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication

Importation of infected cattle Need for rapid, reliable and inexpensive test to be

used at border crossings. Inability to Test and Remove Cattle

Need for reliable, accurate diagnostic tests to remove infected cattle without whole herd depopulation.

Wildlife Reservoirs Need for vaccines for wildlife.

Safe vaccines Vaccine delivery systems

Need for vaccines for cattle. Infected vs Vaccinated

04/21/23 46

Page 47: Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program  Historical Perspective

04/21/23 47

Questions?


Recommended