Date post: | 26-Oct-2014 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | andre-ribeiro |
View: | 116 times |
Download: | 5 times |
Hypothesis
Is Bisphenol A a Weak Carcinogen like the Natural Estrogens andDiethylstilbestrol?
Ercole L. Cavalieri1,2 and Eleanor G. Rogan1,21Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center,986805 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE2Department of Environmental, Agricultural and Occupational Health, College of Public Health,University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985110 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
Summary
Bisphenol A (BPA) displays weak estrogenic properties andcould be a weak carcinogen by a mechanism similar to that of es-trone (E1), estradiol (E2) and the synthetic estrogen diethylstil-bestrol, a human carcinogen. A wide variety of scientific evidencesupports the hypothesis that certain estrogen metabolites, pre-dominantly catechol estrogen-3,4-quinones, react with DNA tocause mutations that can lead to the initiation of cancer. One ofthe major pathways of estrogen metabolism leads to the 4-cate-chol estrogens, 4-OHE1(E2), which are oxidized to their quinones,E1(E2)-3,4-Q. The quinones react with DNA to form predomi-nantly the depurinating adducts 4-OHE1(E2)-1-N3Ade and 4-OHE1(E2)-1-N7Gua. This process constitutes the predominantpathway in the initiation of cancer by estrogens. One pathway ofBPA metabolism is hydroxylation of one of its symmetric ben-zene rings to form its catechol, 3-OHBPA. Subsequent oxidationto BPA-3,4-quinone would lead to reaction with DNA to formpredominantly the depurinating adducts 3-OHBPA-6-N3Ade and3-OHBPA-6-N7Gua. The resulting apurinic sites in the DNAcould generate mutations in critical genes that can initiatehuman cancers. The catechol of BPA may also alter expressionof estrogen-activating and deactivating enzymes, and/or competewith methoxylation of 4-OHE1(E2) by catechol-O-methyltransfer-ase, thereby unbalancing the metabolism of estrogens to increaseformation of E1(E2)-3,4-Q and the depurinating estrogen-DNAadducts leading to cancer initiation. Thus, exposure to BPAcould increase the risk of developing cancer by direct and/orindirect mechanisms. Knowledge of these mechanisms wouldallow us to begin to understand how BPA may act as a weak car-cinogen and would be useful for regulating its use. � 2010 IUBMB
IUBMBLife, 62(10): 746–751, 2010
Keywords estrogens; bisphenol A as carcinogen; molecular mecha-
nism of cancer initiation; catechol estrogen; catechol qui-
nones.
Bisphenol A (BPA) and diethylstilbestrol (DES) were syn-
thesized in the 1930’s as potential inexpensive synthetic estro-
gens. BPA, however, displayed very weak estrogenic properties.
It was rediscovered by polymer scientists and utilized as the
building block of polycarbonate plastic and in the manufacture
of epoxy resins and other plastics such as polyester and styrene.
The worldwide production of BPA is greater than 6 billion
pounds per year, and more than one million pounds of BPA are
released into the atmosphere per year in the U.S. BPA can con-
taminate food by leaching from plastic packaging when it is
heated or gets old. Adverse effects have been observed in ex-
perimental animals exposed to low doses of BPA (1). BPA was
detected in 93% of 2517 urine specimens from a broad national
sample of adults (2), indicating that exposure to BPA is perva-
sive throughout the U.S. population.
BPA could be a weak carcinogen by a mechanism of activa-
tion similar to that of the natural estrogens (3, 4) and the human
carcinogen diethylstilbestrol (5, 6). This line of reasoning builds
on the basic principles of chemical carcinogenesis established
by James and Elizabeth Miller in the 1960’s (7, 8). Experiments
on estrogen metabolism (9–15), formation of DNA adducts (12–
21), mutagenicity (3, 22–25), cell transformation (26–29) and
carcinogenicity (30–33) led to and support the hypothesis that
reaction of specific estrogen metabolites, mostly E1(E2)-3,4-qui-
none, with DNA by 1,4-Michael addition can generate the criti-
cal mutations to initiate breast, prostate and other human can-
cers (3, 4). The major initiating pathway is illustrated in Fig. 1.
E1 and E2 can be metabolically converted to 4-hydroxyE1(E2)
[4-OHE1(E2)] by cytochrome P540 (CYP)1B1. Oxidation of
these catechol estrogens leads to the corresponding E1(E2)-3,4-Q.
These quinones can react with DNA to form small amounts (1%)
Address correspondence to: Ercole L. Cavalieri, Eppley Institute for
Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medi-
cal Center, 986805 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6805,
USA. Tel.: 402-559-7237. Fax: 402-559-8068.
E-mail: [email protected]
Received 13 July 2010; accepted 5 August 2010
ISSN 1521-6543 print/ISSN 1521-6551 online
DOI: 10.1002/iub.376
IUBMB Life, 62(10): 746–751, October 2010
of stable adducts (not shown), which remain in DNA unless
removed by repair, and predominant amounts (99%) of the depu-
rinating adducts 4-OHE1(E2)-1-N3Ade and 4-OHE1(E2)-1-N7Gua
(Fig. 1), which detach from DNA, leaving behind apurinic sites
(20). Errors in the repair of these sites can lead to the critical
mutations initiating breast, prostate and other human cancers (3,
22–25). We think this process constitutes the predominant path-
way in the initiation of cancer by estrogens. The effects of this
pathway of cancer initiation can be seen in the relatively high
levels of depurinating estrogen-DNA adducts in urine samples
not only from women with breast cancer, but also women at
high risk for the disease, as identified by the Gail model score
(Fig. 2) (13, 14).
Analogously, the human carcinogen DES is metabolized to
its catechol, and then oxidized to its quinone, which can react
with DNA to form the 30-OHDES-60-N3Ade and 30-OHDES-60-N7Gua adducts (Fig. 3) (6), which correspond to the depurinat-
ing estrogen-DNA adducts (Fig. 3). Therefore, the common
Figure 1. Major metabolic pathway in cancer initiation by estrogens.
Figure 2. Levels of estrogen-DNA adducts in urine samples from women at normal-risk or high-risk for breast cancer or with the
disease. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
747IS BPA A WEAK CARCINOGEN?
Figure 3. Common pathways of metabolic activation for natural estrogens, diethylstilbestrol, and bisphenol A.
748 CAVALIERI AND ROGAN
denominator of tumor-initiation by the synthetic estrogen DES
and the natural estrogen E2 is formation of their catechol qui-
nones, which react with DNA to afford the depurinating N3Ade
and N7Gua adducts.
POSSIBLE MECHANISMS OF CANCERINITIATION BY BPA
One major pathway of BPA metabolism is hydroxylation of
one of its symmetric rings to form its catechol, 3-OHBPA (Fig.
3) (34, 35). Subsequent oxidation to the electrophilic BPA-3,4-
Q would lead to its reaction with DNA to form predominantly
the depurinating adducts 3-OHBPA-6-N3Ade and 3-OHBPA-6-
N7Gua (Fig. 3). The N7Gua adduct has already been obtained
by reaction of BPA-3,4-Q with DNA (36, 37). The resulting
apurinic sites in the DNA could generate mutations in critical
genes that may initiate breast and other human cancers. The
same mechanism for metabolic activation has been elucidated
not only for the natural estrogens, E1 and E2, and DES (Fig. 3),
but also for several other carcinogens. These include the leu-
kemogen benzene (38, 39), the weak carcinogen naphthalene
(40), and the synthetic estrogen hexestrol (41).
In addition to forming DNA adducts itself, BPA may act
indirectly by imbalancing estrogen metabolism, such that
increased levels of depurinating estrogen-DNA adducts are
formed. These effects could be additive, increasing even further
the risk of BPA to initiate cancer. The first indirect mechanism
would entail the catechol of BPA as a possible competitive in-
hibitor of the methoxylation of 4-OHE1(E2) by the protective
enzyme catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) (Fig. 4), analo-
gously to quercetin (42). This event would increase further the
levels of depurinating estrogen-DNA adducts that could lead to
mutations that initiate cancer.
The second indirect mechanism concerns the four key
enzymes CYP19 (aromatase), CYP1B1, COMT, and NQO1
(quinone reductase) that maintain the balanced estrogen metabo-
lism (Fig. 4). Under normal conditions, metabolism of estrogens
is balanced, and formation of estrogen-DNA adducts is rela-
tively low, as seen in women at normal risk for breast cancer
(Fig. 2) (13, 14). The primary circulating estrogen is E2, which
is produced by conversion of testosterone to E2 by aromatase,
CYP19. E1 and E2 are metabolized by two major pathways: for-
mation of catechol estrogens, 2-OHE1(E2) (not shown in Fig. 4)
and 4-OHE1(E2) (Fig. 4), and 16a-hydroxylation (not shown in
Fig. 4). The most common pathway of conjugation to inhibit
catechol estrogen oxidation occurs by O-methylation catalyzed
by COMT (12, 16, 43). If the expression of CYP19 and/or
CYP1B1 is increased by the presence of BPA, this could
increase the formation of E1(E2) and/or 4-OHE1(E2), respec-
tively, and could result in higher levels of estrogen-DNA
adducts (Fig. 4). If BPA represses expression of NQO1, this
would also result in higher levels of quinones and increased
likelihood of forming the estrogen-DNA adducts. Therefore, it
is possible that BPA could affect the risk of initiating cancer
through imbalances in the metabolism of estrogens.
POSSIBLE CARCINOGENICITY OF BPA IN HUMANS
From all of our studies conducted with the natural estrogens
E1 and E2, the synthetic estrogens DES and hexestrol, benzene
Figure 4. Formation, metabolism, and DNA adducts of 4-catechol estrogens. Activating enzymes and depurinating DNA adducts are in
red and protective enzymes are in green. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
749IS BPA A WEAK CARCINOGEN?
and naphthalene, it is evident that the mechanism of metabolic
activation that leads to their cancer initiation is the formation of
catechols, their oxidation to their respective quinones, and reac-
tion of these electrophilic compounds with DNA at the N-3 of
Ade and N-7 of Gua by 1,4-Michael addition. We knew that all
of the above compounds had weak carcinogenic activity when
we studied their mechanism of metabolic activation. By demon-
strating that BPA has the same mechanism of metabolic activa-
tion as the above compounds, we will gain initial evidence that
BPA could be an extremely weak human carcinogen. Once we
have established the formation of BPA-DNA adducts, we plan
to pursue further studies to investigate the possible weak carci-
nogenicity of BPA. In our opinion, studies with animal models
would be fruitless, because BPA is at most an extremely weak
carcinogen and would not induce tumors within the animal’s
lifetime. For example, the carcinogenic activity of naphthalene
was studied for more than 50 years, and the results were nega-
tive until Abdo et al., found that lifetime treatment of rats by
inhalation of naphthalene vapors induced nasal tumors in 10%
of the animals (44). Additional evidence for the possible carci-
nogenicity of BPA could be obtained by studies of human cell
transformation, as conducted by Russo et al. and in our labora-
tory, with E2 and 4-OHE2 (26–29). In fact, Fernandez and
Russo have recently reported that BPA induces cell transforma-
tion of the MCF-10F human breast epithelial cells (45). In addi-
tion, spot urine samples could be collected from people, in par-
ticular those known to have higher exposure to BPA, and ana-
lyzed for the presence of the two depurinating BPA-DNA
adducts. In conclusion, since 93% of people studied had BPA
present in their urine (2), positive results from the proposed
studies would indicate that exposure to BPA should be elimi-
nated from the environment.
REFERENCES1. vom Saal, F. S., Akingbemi, B. T., Belcher, S. M., Birmbaum, L. S., Crain,
D. A., et al. (2007) Chapel Hill bisphenol A expert panel consensus state-
ment: integration of mechanisms, effects in animals and potential to impact
human health at current levels of exposure. Reprod. Toxicol. 24, 131–138.
2. Calafat, A. M., Ye, X., Wong, Y.-L., Reidy, J. A., and Needham, L. L.
(2008) Exposure of the U.S. population to Bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-
Octylphenol: 2003–2004. Environ. Health Perspect. 116, 39–44.
3. Cavalieri, E., Chakravarti, D., Guttenplan, J., Hart, E., Ingle, J., Janko-
wiak, R., Muti, P., Rogan, E., Russo, J., Santen, R., and Sutter, T.
(2006) Catechol estrogen quinones as initiators of breast and other
human cancers. Implications for biomarkers of susceptibility and cancer
prevention. BBA-Rev. Cancer 1766, 63–78.
4. Cavalieri, E. L. and Rogan, E. G. (2010) Depurinating estrogen-DNA
adducts in the etiology and prevention of breast and other human can-
cers. Future Oncol. 6, 75–91.
5. Herbst, A. L., Ulfelder, H., and Proskanzer, D. C. (1971) Adenocarci-
noma of the vagina. Association of maternal silbestrol therapy with tu-
mor appearance in young women. N. Engl. J. Med. 284, 878–881.
6. Saeed, M., Rogan, E., and Cavalieri, E. (2009) Mechanism of metabolic
activation and DNA adduct formation by the human carcinogen diethyl-
stilbestrol: the defining link to natural estrogens. Int. J. Cancer 124,
1276–1284.
7. Miller, J. A. (1970) Carcinogenesis by chemicals: an overview – GHA
Clowes memorial lecture. Cancer Res. 30, 559–576.
8. Miller, E. C. and Miller, J. A. (1981) Searches for ultimate chemical
carcinogenes and their reactions with cellular macromolecules. Cancer
47, 2327–2345.
9. Zhu, B. T. and Conney, A. H. (1998) Functional role of estrogen metab-
olism in target cells: review and perspectives. Carcinogenesis 19, 1–27.
10. Cavalieri, E. L., Kumar, S., Todorovic, R., Higginbotham, S., Badawi,
A. F., and Rogan, E. G. (2001) Imbalance of estrogen homeostasis in
kidney and liver of hamsters treated with estradiol: implications for
estrogen-induced initiation of renal tumors. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14,
1041–1050.
11. Rogan, E. G., Badawi, A. F., Devanesan, P. D., Meza, J. L., Edney, J.
A., West, W. W., Higginbotham, S. M., and Cavalieri, E. L. (2003) Rel-
ative imbalances in estrogen metabolism and conjugation in breast tis-
sue of women with carcinoma: potential biomarkers of susceptibility to
cancer. Carcinogenesis 24, 697–702.
12. Lu, F., Zahid, M., Saeed, M., Cavalieri, E. L., and Rogan, E. G. (2007)
Estrogen metabolism and formation of estrogen-DNA adducts in estra-
diol-treated MCF-10F cells. The effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin induction and catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition. J. SteroidBiochem. Mol. Biol. 105, 150–158.
13. Gaikwad, N. W., Muti, P., Meza, J., Yang, L., Pruthi, S., Ingle, J.,
Rogan, E. G., and Cavalieri, E. L. (2008) The molecular etiology of
breast cancer: evidence from biomarkers of risk. Int. J. Cancer 122,
1949–1957.
14. Gaikwad, N. W., Yang, L., Pruthi, S., Ingle, J. N., Sandhu, N., Rogan,
E., and Cavalieri, E. (2009) Urine biomarkers of risk in the molecular
etiology of breast cancer. Breast Cancer: Basic Clin. Res. 3, 1–8.
15. Yang, L., Gaikwad, N., Meza, J., Cavalieri, E., Muti, P., Trock, B., and
Rogan, E. (2009) Novel biomarkers for risk of prostate cancer. Results
from a case-control study. Prostate 69, 41–48.
16. Zahid, M., Saeed, M., Lu, F., Gaikwad, N., Rogan, E., and Cavalieri, E.
L. (2007) Inhibition of catechol-O-methyltransferase increases estrogen
DNA-adduct formation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 43, 1534–1540.
17. Cavalieri, E. L., Stack, D. E., Devanesan, P. D., Todorovic, R., Dwiv-
edy, I., Higginbotham, S., Johansson, S. L., Patil, K. D., Gross, M. L.,
Gooden, J. K., Ramanathan, R., Cerny, R. L., and Rogan, E. G. (1997)
Molecular origin of cancer: catechol estrogen-3,4-quinones as endoge-
nous tumor initiators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 10937–10942.
18. Markushin, Y., Zhong, W., Cavalieri, E. L., Rogan, E. G., Small, G. J.,
Yeung, E. S., and Jankowiak, R. (2003) Spectral characterization of cate-
chol estrogen quinone (CEQ)-derived DNA adducts and their identifica-
tion in human breast tissue extract. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 16, 1107–1117.
19. Li, K.-M., Todorovic, R., Devanesan, P., Higginbotham, S., Kofeler, H.,
Ramanathan, R., Gross, M. L., Rogan, E. G., and Cavalieri, E. L.
(2004) Metabolism and DNA binding studies of 4-hydroxyestradiol and
estradiol-3,4-quinone in vitro and in female ACI rat mammary gland in
vivo. Carcinogenesis 25, 289–297.
20. Zahid, M., Kohli, E., Saeed, M., Rogan, E., and Cavalieri, E. (2006)
The greater reactivity of estradiol-3,4-quinone versus estradiol-2,3-qui-
none with DNA in the formation of depurinating DNA adducts. Impli-
cations for tumor-initiating activity. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 19, 164–172.
21. Markushin, Y., Gaikwad, N., Zhang, H., Kapke, P., Rogan, E. G., Cava-
lieri, E. L., Trock, B. J., Pavlovich, C., and Jankowiak, R. (2006) Poten-
tial biomarker for early risk assessment of prostate cancer. Prostate 66,
1565–1571.
22. Chakravarti, D., Mailander, P., Li, K.-M., Higginbotham, S., Zhang, H.
L., Gross, M. L., Meza, J. L., Cavalieri, E. L., and Rogan, E. G. (2001)
Evidence that a burst of DNA depurination in SENCAR mouse skin
induces error-prone repair and form mutations in the H-ras gene. Onco-
gene 20, 7945–7953.
23. Mailander, P. C., Meza, J. L., Higginbotham, S., and Chakravarti, D.
(2006) Induction of A.T to G.C mutations by erroneous repair of depu-
750 CAVALIERI AND ROGAN
rinated DNA following estrogen treatment of the mammary gland of
ACI rats. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 101, 204–215.
24. Zhao, Z., Kosinska, W., Khmelnitsky, M., Cavalieri, E. L., Rogan, E.
G., Chakravarti, D., Sacks, P. G., and Guttenplan, J. B. (2006) Muta-
genic activity of 4-hydroxyestradiol, but not 2-hydroxyestradiol, in BB
rat2 embryonic cells, and the mutational spectrum of 4-hydroxyestra-
diol. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 19, 475–479.
25. Fernandez, S. V., Russo, I. H., and Russo, J. (2006) Estradiol and its
metabolites 4-hydroxyestradiol and 2-hydroxyestradiol induce mutations
in human breast epithelial cells. Int. J. Cancer 118, 1862–1868.
26. Russo, J., Hasan Lareef, M., Balogh, G., Guo, S., and Russo, I. H.
(2003) Estrogen and its metabolites are carcinogenic agents in human
breast epithelial cells. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 87, 1–25.
27. Lareef, M. H., Garber, J., Russo, P. A., Russo, I. H., Heulings, R., and
Russo, J. (2005) The estrogen antagonist ICI-182–780 does not inhibit
the transformation phenotypes induced by 17-beta-estradiol and 4-OH
estradiol in human breast epithelial cells. Int. J. Oncol. 26, 423–429.
28. Russo, J., Fernandez, S. V., Russo, P. A., Fernbaugh, R., Sheriff, F. S.,
Lareef, H. M., Garber, J., and Russo, I. H. (2006) 17-Beta-estradiol
induces transformation and tumorigenesis in human breast epithelial
cells. FASEB J. 20, 1622–1634.
29. Lu, F., Zahid, M., Wang, C., Saeed, M., Cavalieri, E. L., and Rogan, E.
G. (2008) Resveratrol prevents estrogen-DNA adduct formation and
neoplastic transformation in MCF-10F cells. Cancer Prev. Res. 1, 135–
145.
30. Liehr, J. G, Fang, W. F., Sirbasku, D. A., and Ari-Ulubelen, A. (1986)
Carcinogenicity of catecholestrogens in Syrian hamsters. J. Steroid Bio-
chem. 24, 353–356.
31. Li, J. J. and Li, S. A. (1987) Estrogen carcinogenesis in Syrian hamster
tissue: role of metabolism. Fed. Proc. 46, 1858–1863.32. Newbold, R. R. and Liehr, J. G. (2000) Induction of uterine adenocarci-
noma in CD-1 mice by catechol estrogens. Cancer Res. 60, 235–237.
33. Yue, W., Santen, R. J., Wang, J. P., Li, Y., Verderame, M. F., Bocchin-
fuso, W. P., Korach, K. S., Devanesan, P., Todorovic, R., Rogan, E. G.,
and Cavalieri, E. L. (2003) Genotoxic metabolites of estradiol in breast:
potential mechanism of estradiol induced carcinogenesis. J. Steroid Bio-
chem. Mol. Biol. 86, 477–486.
34. Nakagawa, Y. and Suzuki, T. (2001) Metabolism of bisphenol A in iso-
lated rat hepatocytes and oestrogenic activity of a hydroxylated metabo-
lite in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Xenobiotica 31, 113–123.
35. Jaeg, J. P., Perdu, E., Dolo, J., Debrauwer, L., Cravedi, J. P., and Zalko,
D. (2004) Characterization of new bisphenol A metabolites produced by
CD1 mice liver microsomes and S9 fractions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52,
4935–4942.
36. Qiu, S. X., Yang, R. Z., and Gross, M. L. (2004) Synthesis and liquid
chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric characterization of the
adducts of bisphenol A o-quinone with glutathione and nucleotide
monophosphates. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 17, 1038–1046.37. Edmonds, J. S., Nomachi, M., Terasaki, M., Morita, M., Skelton, B. S.,
and White, A. H. (2004) The reaction of bisphenol A 3,4-quinone with
DNA. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 319, 556–561.
38. Cavalieri, E. L., Li, K.-M., Balu, N., Saeed, M., Devanesan, P., Higgin-
botham, S., Zhao, J., Gross, M. L., and Rogan, E. (2002) Catechol
ortho-quinones: the electrophilic compounds that form depurinating
DNA adducts and could initiate cancer and other diseases. Carcinogene-sis 23, 1071–1077.
39. Zahid, M., Saeed, M., Rogan, E. G., and Cavalieri, E. L. (2010) Ben-
zene and dopamine catechol quinones could initiate cancer or neuro-
genic disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 48, 318–324.40. Saeed, M., Higginbotham, S., Gaikwad, N., Chakravarti, D., Rogan, E.,
and Cavalieri, E. (2009) Depurinating naphthalene-DNA adducts in
mouse skin related to cancer initiation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 47,
1075–1081.
41. Saeed, M., Gunselman, S. J., Higginbotham, S., Rogan, E., and Cava-
lieri, E. (2005) Formation of the depurinating N3adenine and N7guanine
adducts by reaction of DNA with hexestrol-30-40-quinone or enzyme-
activated 30-hydroxyhexestrol. Implications for a unifying mechanism of
tumor initiation by natural and synthetic estrogens. Steroids 70, 37–45.
42. Zhu, B. T. and Liehr, J. G. (1996) Inhibition of catechol-O-methyltrans-
ferase-catalyzed O-methylation of 2- and 4-hydroxyestradiol by querce-
tin: possible role in estradiol-induced tumorigenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 271,
1357–1363.
43. Mannisto, P. T. and Kaakola, S. (1999) Catechol-O-methyltransferase
(COMT): biochemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology, and clinical
effects of new selective COMT inhibitors. Pharmacol Rev. 51, 593–628.
44. Abdo, K. M., Grumbein, S., Chou, B. J., and Herbert, R. (2001) Toxic-
ity and carcinogenicity study in F344 rats following 2 years of whole-
body exposure to naphthalene vapors. Inhal. Toxicol. 13, 931–950.45. Fernandez, S. V. and Russo, J. (2010) Estrogen and xenoestrogens in
breast cancer. Toxicol. Pathol. 38, 110–122.
751IS BPA A WEAK CARCINOGEN?