+ All Categories
Home > Documents > BRENTON T.26N.-R.9E....6 AqrOU kK 2016 Area Symbol1 IL053, Soil Area Version. 1 1 Code 235A 91A "91...

BRENTON T.26N.-R.9E....6 AqrOU kK 2016 Area Symbol1 IL053, Soil Area Version. 1 1 Code 235A 91A "91...

Date post: 08-Feb-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
4
BRENTON SEE PAGE 36 T.26N.-R.9E. •OUT . qq w I 9A _„ •T* MreaH fi\ •*«1 ^-^"^ ! j*- 'i ' 2011 RotlfanlMapPt&U In, 1200E 1300E 1500E 1600E 1BCX1L
Transcript
  • BRENTONSEE PAGE 36

    T.26N.-R.9E.•OUT

    . qq w I 9A _„•T* MreaH f i \ W»

    •*«1 ̂ -^"^ ! j*-

    'i ' 2011 RotlfanlMapPt&U In,1200E 1300E 1500E 1600E 1BCX1L

  • FSA Map Page 1 of 1

    Hf 'surety« AgnOal* hie 2016 www AtftDattnc COT

    •K^̂ BK^H BEKB"

    map center: 40° 42' 12.59, 88° 12' 37.85 Oft 886ft 1772ft

    29-26N-9EFord County W^

    Illinoiss

    8/4/2016

    https://www.suretymaps.com/reports/customreport.aspx?sid=DF7840489FE963C41A6B36... 8/4/2016

  • Soil Map Page 1 of2

    Soils Map

    Soils data provided by USDA and NRCS: 2016 AqriData. Inc

    18

    Z19 -*=

    17

    20r

    -*21*•sm9a

    TT30 29

    2016 AqnDala. IncState: IllinoisCounty: FordLocation: 29-26N-9ETownship: BrentonAcres: 151.01Date: 8/4/2016

    î surety n|h6 AqrOU kK 2016

    Area Symbol1 IL053, Soil Area Version. 1 1

    Code

    235A

    91A

    "91 B2

    "241 C3

    238A

    "375B

    "241 D3

    230A

    https:

    oildescription

    Bryce siltyclay, 0 to 2percent slopes

    wygert siltylay loam, 0 topercent

    lopes

    wygert siltyclay loam, 2 to

    percentlopes, eroded

    Chatswortr,ilty clay, 4 topercent

    lopes,severely

    roded

    Rantoul siltylay, 0 to 2

    percent slopes

    Rutland siltyclay loam, 2 to5 percentslopes

    Chatsworthsilty clay, 6 to1 2 percentslopesseverelyeroded

    //www.sur

    cres

    7.11

    833

    693

    396

    2.29

    5.78

    4.05

    2.56

    etyn

    3ercentf field

    31.2%

    18.8%

    178%

    159%

    8.1%

    3.8%

    27*

    1 7V

    laps.c

    State'roductivityndexegend

    om/repor

    Subsoilooting

    FAV

    UNF

    UNF

    UNF

    FAV

    FAV

    UNF

    FAV

    ts/cus

    CornBu/A

    162

    158

    '147

    "79

    144

    "178

    "75

    14

    tomr

    oybeansu/A

    54

    52

    "48

    "28

    49

    "57

    "27

    49

    eport.a:

    i/Wieatu/A

    64

    63

    "59

    "28

    56

    "70

    "27

    5

    >px?s

    Oats3b'A

    82

    79

    "73

    "31

    64

    "96

    "30

    7

    id=I

    SorghumBu/A

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    c

    3F784<

    Alfalfadhay/A

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    000

    000

    0.0

    )489I

    Grass-egume

    hay,T/A

    4.77

    4.52

    "4.20

    "2.54

    4.14

    "5.46

    "2.41

    426

    ^E963<

    Droproductivity

    ndex forptimum

    "nanagement

    121

    118

    "110

    "60

    109

    "132

    "57

    111

    :41A6B36 8/4/2016

  • Soil Map Page 2 of2Rowe silty clayloam, 0 to 2percent slopes

    Weighted Average 142 47.3 55.7 69.2 •- 0.00 4.17 106.4Table: Optimum Crop Productivity Ratings for Illinois Soil by K.R. Olson and J.M. Lang, Office of Research, ACES, University of Illinoat Champaign-Urbana. Version 1/2/2012 Amended Table S2 B811Crop yields and productivity indices for optimum management (B811) are maintained at the following NRES web site.httcs://www.ideals Illinois edufhandle/2142/1027/" Indexes adjusted for slope and erosion according to Bulletin 811 Table S3a UNF = unfavorable; FAV • favorableb Soils in the southern region were not rated for oats and are shown with a zero "0".c Soils in the northern region or in both regions were not rated for grain sorghum and are shown with a zero "0"d Soils in the poorly drained group were not rated for alfalfa and are shown with a zero "0"e Soils in the well drained group were not rated for grass-legume and are shown with a zero "0".•c: Using Capabilities Class Dominant Condition Aggregation Method

    Soils data provided Dy USDA and NRCS Soils data provided Dy University of Illinois at Criampagn-Urbana

    https://www.suretymaps.com/reports/customreport.aspx?sid=DF7840489FE963C41A6B36... 8/4/2016


Recommended