+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Brooks_Typography12

Brooks_Typography12

Date post: 07-Mar-2016
Category:
Upload: randy-dunbar
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
Popular Tags:
21
t ypography portfolio
Transcript
Page 1: Brooks_Typography12

typographyportfolio

Page 2: Brooks_Typography12

katie brooks typography portfolio 2

Table of ContentsCover....................................................... . .page 1:

helvetica neue prestige elite

Table of Contents.................................page 2:roboto

Logo...........................................................page 3:roboto

Ubiquitous Type................................page 4-5:bodoni

adobe kaitiminion pro

Sketchbook.........................................page 6-7:roboto

Snaps.................................................page 8-17:roboto

Monaco Poster..............................page18-19:storm

helvetica neue

Font Designer Poster..................page 20-21: goudy old style

Page 3: Brooks_Typography12

KATIE BROOKSgraphic design

Logo

Page 4: Brooks_Typography12

katie brooks typography portfolio 4

Typography makes at least two kinds of sense, if it makes any sense at all. It makes visual sense

and historical sense. The visual side of typography is always on display, and materials for the study of its visual form are many and widespread. The history of letter- forms and their usage is visible too, to those with access to manuscripts, inscriptions andold books, but from others it is largely hidden. This book has therefore grown into some-thing more than a short manual of typo-graphic etiquette. It is the fruit of a lot of long walks in the wilderness of letters: in part a pocket field guide to the living wonders that are found there, and in part a meditation on the ecological principles, survival techniques, and ethics that apply. The principles of typography as I understand them are not a set of dead conventions but the tribal customs of the magic forest, where ancient voices speak from all directions and new ones move to unremembered forms. One question, nevertheless, has been often in my mind. When all right-thinking human beings are struggling to remember that other men and women are free to be different,6and free to become more different still, how can one honestly write a rulebook? What reason and authority exist for these commandments,

suggestions, and instructions? Surely typographers, like others, ought to be at liberty to follow or to blaze the trails they choose. Typography thrives as a shared concern - and there are no paths at all where there are no shared desires and directions. A typographer determined to forge new routes must move, like other solitary travellers, through uninhabited country and against the grain of the land, crossing common thoroughfares in the silence before dawn. The subject

of this book is not typographic solitude, but the old, well- travelled roads at the core of the tradition: paths that each of us is free to follow or not, and to enter and leave when we choose - if only we know the paths are there and havea sense of where they lead. That freedom is denied us if the tradition is concealed or left for dead. Originality is everywhere, but much originality is blocked if the way back to earlier discoveries is cut or overgrown. If you use this book as a guide, by all means leave the road when you wish. That is pre- cisely the use of a road: to reach individu- ally chosen points of departure. By all means break

the rules, and break them beautifully, deliberately, and well. That is one of the ends for which they exist.Letterforms change constantly, yet differ very little, because they are alive. The principles of typographic clarity

have also scarcely altered since the second half of the fifteenth century, when the first books were printed in roman type. Indeed, most of the principles of legibility and design explored in this book were known and used by Egyptian scribes writing hieratic script with reed pens on papyrus in 1000 B.C. Samples of their work sit now in museums in Cairo, London and New York, still lively, subtle, and perfectly legible thirty centuries after they were made Writing systems vary, but a good page is not hard to learn to recognize, whether it comes from Tang Dynasty China, The Egyptian New Kingdom typographers

set for themselves than with the mutable

or Renaissance Italy. The principles that unite these distant schools of design are based on the structure and scale of the human body - the eye, the hand, and the forearm in particular - and on the invisible but no less real, no less demanding, no less sensuous anatomy of the human mind. I don’t like to call these principles universals, because they are largely unique to our species. Dogs and ants, for example, read and write by more chemical means. But the underlying principles of typography are,

at any rate, stable enough to weather any number of human fashions and fads.Typography is the craft of endowing human language with a durable visual form, and thus with an independent existence. Its heartwood is calligraphy the dance, on a tiny stage, ofIt is true that typographer’s tools are presently changing with considerable force and speed, but this is not a manual

in the use of any particular typesetting system or medium. I suppose that most readers of this book will set most of their type in digital form, using computers, but I have no preconceptions about which brands of computers, or which versions of which proprietary software, they may use. The essential elements of style have more to do with the goals the living, speaking hand - and its roots reach into living soil, though its branches may be hung each year with new machines. So long as the root lives, typography remains a source of true delight, true knowledge, true surprise.

The presence of typography both good and bad, can be seen everywhere. {“Typography is the craft of endowing human language with a durable

visual form, and thus with an independent existence.” }

UbiquitousType

Page 5: Brooks_Typography12

Typography makes at least two kinds of sense, if it makes any sense at all. It makes visual sense

and historical sense. The visual side of typography is always on display, and materials for the study of its visual form are many and widespread. The history of letter- forms and their usage is visible too, to those with access to manuscripts, inscriptions andold books, but from others it is largely hidden. This book has therefore grown into some-thing more than a short manual of typo-graphic etiquette. It is the fruit of a lot of long walks in the wilderness of letters: in part a pocket field guide to the living wonders that are found there, and in part a meditation on the ecological principles, survival techniques, and ethics that apply. The principles of typography as I understand them are not a set of dead conventions but the tribal customs of the magic forest, where ancient voices speak from all directions and new ones move to unremembered forms. One question, nevertheless, has been often in my mind. When all right-thinking human beings are struggling to remember that other men and women are free to be different,6and free to become more different still, how can one honestly write a rulebook? What reason and authority exist for these commandments,

suggestions, and instructions? Surely typographers, like others, ought to be at liberty to follow or to blaze the trails they choose. Typography thrives as a shared concern - and there are no paths at all where there are no shared desires and directions. A typographer determined to forge new routes must move, like other solitary travellers, through uninhabited country and against the grain of the land, crossing common thoroughfares in the silence before dawn. The subject

of this book is not typographic solitude, but the old, well- travelled roads at the core of the tradition: paths that each of us is free to follow or not, and to enter and leave when we choose - if only we know the paths are there and havea sense of where they lead. That freedom is denied us if the tradition is concealed or left for dead. Originality is everywhere, but much originality is blocked if the way back to earlier discoveries is cut or overgrown. If you use this book as a guide, by all means leave the road when you wish. That is pre- cisely the use of a road: to reach individu- ally chosen points of departure. By all means break

the rules, and break them beautifully, deliberately, and well. That is one of the ends for which they exist.Letterforms change constantly, yet differ very little, because they are alive. The principles of typographic clarity

have also scarcely altered since the second half of the fifteenth century, when the first books were printed in roman type. Indeed, most of the principles of legibility and design explored in this book were known and used by Egyptian scribes writing hieratic script with reed pens on papyrus in 1000 B.C. Samples of their work sit now in museums in Cairo, London and New York, still lively, subtle, and perfectly legible thirty centuries after they were made Writing systems vary, but a good page is not hard to learn to recognize, whether it comes from Tang Dynasty China, The Egyptian New Kingdom typographers

set for themselves than with the mutable

or Renaissance Italy. The principles that unite these distant schools of design are based on the structure and scale of the human body - the eye, the hand, and the forearm in particular - and on the invisible but no less real, no less demanding, no less sensuous anatomy of the human mind. I don’t like to call these principles universals, because they are largely unique to our species. Dogs and ants, for example, read and write by more chemical means. But the underlying principles of typography are,

at any rate, stable enough to weather any number of human fashions and fads.Typography is the craft of endowing human language with a durable visual form, and thus with an independent existence. Its heartwood is calligraphy the dance, on a tiny stage, ofIt is true that typographer’s tools are presently changing with considerable force and speed, but this is not a manual

in the use of any particular typesetting system or medium. I suppose that most readers of this book will set most of their type in digital form, using computers, but I have no preconceptions about which brands of computers, or which versions of which proprietary software, they may use. The essential elements of style have more to do with the goals the living, speaking hand - and its roots reach into living soil, though its branches may be hung each year with new machines. So long as the root lives, typography remains a source of true delight, true knowledge, true surprise.

The presence of typography both good and bad, can be seen everywhere. {“Typography is the craft of endowing human language with a durable

visual form, and thus with an independent existence.” }

UbiquitousType

Page 6: Brooks_Typography12

katie brooks typography portfolio 6

Sketchbook

loved this saying...positivity

childhood memories

loved the lighting, lace and fresh

flowers

pure joy

bright colors make me happy

Page 7: Brooks_Typography12

love to travel

love

design is every where

color swatches

Page 8: Brooks_Typography12

katie brooks typography portfolio 8

snaps The snaps were used as an exercise to experiment with type and the different functions it can add to a design. Each week we would add on different elements such as rule, bold, repetition, and color. As we added on each new element, it completely altered the way type was seen and used among each design piece. Snaps gave me a new perspective on how type can completely change design and how it can add character to a design, or become the design itself.

Page 9: Brooks_Typography12

snapliterary journal

issue six

in this issue:saul bass

noam chomskyroland young

yoko onosalman rushdie

volume 1

Page 10: Brooks_Typography12

katie brooks typography portfolio 10

noam chomsky

sna

literary journal

issue six

in th

is iss

ue:

saul b

assno

am ch

omsk

y

rolan

d you

ng

yoko

onosal

man ru

shdie

volume 1

p

Page 11: Brooks_Typography12

snapsaul bass

noam chomsky

roland young

yoko ono

salman rushdie

issue six

in this issue:

literary

volume 1

journal

Page 12: Brooks_Typography12

katie brooks typography portfolio 12

ssnap

literary journal volume 1 issue six in this issue:

yoko ono

solman rushdie

noam chomsky

roland youngsaul bass

Page 13: Brooks_Typography12

ap

nslite

rary j

ourn

al vo

lume 1

issu

e six

in th

is iss

ue:

yoko ono

noam chomsky

roland young

solman rushdie

saul bass

Page 14: Brooks_Typography12

katie brooks typography portfolio 14

ssn

literary

journal

volume 1

iss

ue six

in this issue:p

no

am c

hom

sky

yoko ono

roland young

asolman rushdie

saul bass

Page 15: Brooks_Typography12

snapliterary journalsaul bass noam chomsky roland young solm

an rushdie yoko ono

in this issue:

volume 1 issue 6

Page 16: Brooks_Typography12

katie brooks typography portfolio 16

snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnap snapsnapsnaps napsnapsnap snapsnapsn apsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnap snapsna psnapsna psnapsnap snapsnapsnaps napsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap

snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnaps

napsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnap

snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnaps napsnapsnapsnapsn

apsnapsnapsna

psnapsnapsna

psnapsnaps

nap snapsn

apsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsna

psnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnap snapsna

psnapsna psnapsnapsnaps nap

snapsnapsnapsn

apsnapsnapsnap

snapsnapsnaps

napsnapsnapsn

apsnapsnap sn

apsnapsnapsn

apsnapsnapsn

apsnapsnapsn

apsnapsnaps

napsnapsnap

snap snapsnapsna

psnapsnaps

napsnapsnap

snapsnapsnaps

napsna psnapsnap snap sna psnapsnapsn apsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsna psnap snapsnapsnapsn apsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsn apsnapsnapsnapsnapsna psnap snapsnapsn

apsnapsna

snapsnapsna psnapsnapsnapsnapsn apsnapsnapsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnap snapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnaps napsnap snapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsnapsnapsn apsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnap snaps napsnapsnapsnapsn apsnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnap snapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsn ap snapsnapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnap snapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsn ap snapsnapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnap snapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsn ap snapsnapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnap snapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsn ap snapsnapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnap sn apsnaps

snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsn ap snapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnap snapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsn ap snapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsn apsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsn apsnapsnap snapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsn ap snapsnapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnap snapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsn ap snapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnapsn apsnapsnapsnaps napsnap snapsn apsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsna psnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnaps napsnapsnapsnap sn apsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnapsnap snliterary journal

volume 1 issue sixin this issue:

solman rushdie noam chomsky saul bass roland young yoko ono

s

Page 17: Brooks_Typography12

s pnaliterary journal

volume 1 issue sixin this issue:

youngono

rushdie

basschomsky

saulnoam

salman

yoko

roland

Page 18: Brooks_Typography12

katie brooks typography portfolio 18

grand prix de monaco poster

Page 19: Brooks_Typography12
Page 20: Brooks_Typography12

katie brooks typography portfolio 20

font designer poster

Page 21: Brooks_Typography12

7ganW

drjky

eB4LrN2Te

8p

Y f

;

Fl

Goudy Old Style is a classic serif type-face created by Frederic W. Goudy in 1915. Founded by the American Type Founders, Goudy Old Style’s design is very graceful and balanced with an up-ward curved ear on the letter G as one of it’s main characteristics. The font also re-placed the circular shape found in punctuation such as periods and exclamation marks with a di-amond shape, as well as for the dot over the letters J and I. Some of the letters also have a calligraphic quality such as the letter Q as the serif feet are quite round and curved. Goudy is suggested to have a Venetian influence due to its rounded, curvilinear glyphs. This type-face is considered to be among one of the most legible serif typefaces for use in print and is used in Harper Bazaar Magazine.

Goudy Old Style

v

e3ep

2x

z

n& mo

A fkw

ka pzW

th

eq

q skmuolc je ;4

Jr u

o er5

Frederi

c W.

GO

UD

Y

b

p