+ All Categories
Home > Documents > BRT vs MRT

BRT vs MRT

Date post: 24-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: roslinekmat
View: 167 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
2
BRT vs MRT/LRT Service Coverage & Project Cost Total Length = 150km Underground Line = 50km Total Project Cost = RM43 billion Total Length = 348km All At-Grade Level Total Project Cost = RM3.5 billion
Transcript
Page 1: BRT vs MRT

BRT vs MRT/LRTService Coverage & Project Cost

Total Length = 150kmUnderground Line = 50kmTotal Project Cost = RM43 billion

Total Length = 348kmAll At-Grade LevelTotal Project Cost = RM3.5 billion

Page 2: BRT vs MRT

BRT vs MRT/LRT• Low Capex, Low Opex• High coverage, more

patronage, feeders part of system

• Quick to implement and operationalised (within 2-3 years to achieve NKRA)

• Private finance initiative possible

• Healthy competition for SMEs• Low or no subsidy, affordable

fares• Capacity up to 40,000 pphpd,

then upgrade to rail where necessary, operations flexible to meet changing demand

• Very high capex, high opex• Limited coverage, still depend

on feeders (buses) • Legthy implementation period

(5-10 yrs for the first 25 km), NKRA target not achieavable

• Public finance and massive land deal.

• Monopolistic/ big boys club• High/ long term subsidy/ high

fares• Infra capacity over-provided on

some route. Not cost effective• operations not flexible to meet

changing demand.


Recommended