+ All Categories
Home > Documents > BS5837 2012: Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and ... · Arboricultural method statement...

BS5837 2012: Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and ... · Arboricultural method statement...

Date post: 09-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: lekhue
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
52
(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515 Arboricultural Consultancy Ecology & Habitat Consultancy Land, Building & Engineering Surveys Utility Mapping, Tracing & Radar Surveys Site Report, Appraisal & Plans “BS5837 2012: Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and Construction” Project: Bishopgarth Date: October 2014 Ref: BG-BS-001 Revision: Revision A
Transcript

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Arboricultural Consultancy

Ecology & Habitat Consultancy

Land, Building & Engineering Surveys

Utility Mapping, Tracing & Radar Surveys

Site Report, Appraisal & Plans

“BS5837 2012: Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and Construction”

Project: Bishopgarth

Date: October 2014

Ref: BG-BS-001

Revision: Revision A

2 (Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE

T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 3

1.1 INSTRUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 PROVIDED DOCUMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 TREE DATA COLLECTION .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.5 INTERPRETATION OF TREE DATA .................................................................................................................... 3

2 SITE CONTEXT .......................................................................................................................................... 5

2.1 SITE OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 SURROUNDING AREA .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.3 GEOLOGICAL DETAILS.................................................................................................................................. 5 2.4 PROPOSALS ............................................................................................................................................... 5

3 ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................ 6

3.1 SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ON TREES ............................................................................................................. 6 3.2 DETAILED IMPACT ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 IMPACT ON LOCAL AMENITY ......................................................................................................................... 9 3.4 PROTECTION OF RETAINED TREES .................................................................................................................. 9 3.5 TREES WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO STRUCTURES ............................................................................................ 9

4 ARBORICULTURAL METHODS STATEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT ...................................... 10

4.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 10 4.2 PROGRAMME AND PHASING OF TREE MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................... 10

Stage 1: Carry out agreed tree removal works ............................................................................... 10 Stage 2. Carry out demolition works ............................................................................................... 11 Stage 3. Implement tree protection ................................................................................................ 12 Stage 4. Carry out construction works. ........................................................................................... 12 Stage 5. Remove stem/tree protection. .......................................................................................... 12

4.3 ADDITIONAL NOTES .................................................................................................................................. 12 Site Storage, Cement Mixing and Washing Points .......................................................................... 12 Services ........................................................................................................................................... 13

5 APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................................... 14

3 (Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE

T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

1 Introduction

1.1 Instruction Christians Environmental have been instructed to inspect all trees within the site boundary and trees in adjacent land that may be affected by the proposed development, the aim of which is to prepare the following information to accompany a planning submission for the site:

Schedule of the relevant trees to include basic data and a condition assessment

Appraisal of the impact of the proposed development on the trees and any resulting impact that it has on local amenity.

Arboricultural method statement setting out appropriate protective measures and management for trees to be retained.

1.2 Purpose of the Report This report provides an analysis of the impact of any proposed development on trees and local amenity with additional guidance on appropriate management and protective measures. Its primary purpose is for the Local Authority to review any tree issues associated with any future planning applications and use as a basis for issuing a planning consent or engaging in further discussions towards that end. During the planning process, this document and accompanying data will be available for inspection by people including the general public; therefore we aim to present the information in a format that is easily understandable to people without a general knowledge of the subject area.

1.3 Provided Documents The following plans have been provided.

Land Survey, provided in dwg format

Site Master Plan

1.4 Tree Data Collection

All Trees on site which are adjacent to any proposed development areas or fall directly into these areas

have been numbered and species identified. Each tree has also been inspected as described in British

Standard 5837; this includes information on height, diameter, crown spread, maturity, condition and

recommendations. Each tree is also classified as a category A, B, C or U (Summary in the Appendix).

This categorization reflects the trees material constraint on the proposed development. Collection of

information also takes into consideration any low branches, structural or physiological conditions and

any remaining contribution that the tree offers to the site.

1.5 Interpretation of Tree Data

Within section 5 of the British Standard BS 5837 it recommends that the stem diameter taken at breast

height is used to calculate the root protection area. This root protection area can be interpreted to

identify any design constraints to the site. Once site design has taken place this data can be used to

form the basis of any exclusion zone and position of protective barriers/fencing.

Also included within this report are:

The Tree Constraints Plan which identifies any arboricultural constraints on site.

The Tree Protection Plan which shows the location of the protective fencing and area set to

exclusion zones.

4 (Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE

T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

These plans act as a visual aid in the planning stage and are also designed to aid and instruct

contractors on site. The use of these plans should also be implemented on site visits to check on the

location of the protective barrier and area.

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

2 Site Context

2.1 Site Overview

The site is currently a training facility made up of several buildings and various open spaces.

2.2 Surrounding Area

The immediate surrounding area consists of residential dwellings.

2.3 Geological Details

Texture:

Loam and clay

pH: Acid Drainage: Impeded Fertility: Low Carbon: Medium Drains to: Stream network

(Land Information Systems, 2014.)

2.4 Proposals

The proposals are to build residential dwellings across the site.

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

3 Arboricultural Impact Assessment

3.1 Summary of the Impact on Trees

Within the proposed development area and including adjacent land there is a total of 203 individual

trees, 6 groups of trees and 2 hedges. 33 trees will need to be removed in order to accommodate the

proposals along with 3 groups and 1 hedge.

29%

35%

29%

7%

% Total Trees By Catergory

A

B

C

U4

14

15

15

A

B

C

U

0 5 10 15 20

Tree Removal By Catergory

Category Total Tree Tags

Cat A 4 T61, T83, T120, T142

Cat B 14 T9, T57, T67, T77, T78, T89, T90, T124, T125, T126, T131, T137, T138, T203

Cat C 15 T8, T10, T11, T70, T71, T72, T73, T79, T81, T88, T118, T119, T121, T132, T140

Cat U 15 T12, T66, T74, T80, T99, T122, T123, T127, T136, T139, T150, T152, T156, T162, T202

Ind

ivid

ual

Tre

es

Tree

Rem

ova

l

by

Tag

7 (Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE

T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

3.2 Detailed Impact Assessment

(Please refer to the Tree Constraints and Tree Data Section when reading the below information).

Category B trees and groups. (Trees of moderate quality)

Removal due to the proposals Rooting affected by the proposals Pruning due to the proposals

T9, T57, T67, T77, T78, T89, T90, T124, T125, T126, T131, T137, T138, T203

- -

Trees T9 will need to be removed in order to facilitate the access road off of College Grove Road..

T125, T126 and T137 will need to be removed in order to facilitate the access road off of Westfield Road.

The remaining mentioned trees will need to be removed in order to accommodate the proposal. A number of trees have the potential to be affected by the proposals. It is intended to apply tree protection methods to ensure that trees are adequately protected throughout the construction phase. For more information refer to the tree data sheets, tree retention plans, special construction plans and method statement.

Category A trees and groups. (Trees of high quality)

Removal due to the proposals Rooting affected by the proposals Pruning due to the proposals

T61, T83, T120 T142 - -

Trees T61, T83 and T120 will need to be removed in order to accommodate the proposal.

T142 will need to be removed in order to facilitate the access road off of Westfield Road. A number of trees have the potential to be affected by the proposals. It is intended to apply tree protection methods to ensure that trees are adequately protected throughout the construction phase. For more information refer to the tree data sheets, tree retention plans, special construction plans and method statement.

8 (Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE

T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Category C trees and groups. (Trees of low quality)

Removal due to the proposals Rooting affected by the proposals Pruning due to the proposals

T8, T10, T11, T70, T71, T72, T73, T79, T81, T88, T118, T119, T121, T132, T140

- -

Trees T8 and T10 will need to be removed in order to facilitate the access road off of College Grove Road.

T138 and T140 will need to be removed in order to facilitate the access road off of Westfield Road.

The remaining mentioned trees will need to be removed in order to accommodate the proposal.

A number of trees have the potential to be affected by the proposals. It is intended to apply tree protection methods to ensure that trees are adequately protected throughout the construction phase. For more information refer to the tree data sheets, tree retention plans, special construction plans and method statement.

Category U trees and groups. (Trees unsuitable for retention)

Removal due to poor quality and/or health & safety requirements

Trees T12, T66, T74, T80, T99, T122, T123, T127, T136, T139, T150, T152, T156, T162 and T202 are all

recommended for removal due to overall poor condition.

For more information refer to the tree data sheets, tree retention plans, special construction plans and method statement.

Groups G3, G6 and G7 will also need to be removed to accommodate he proposal along with H2.

T14 T12, T66, T74, T80, T99, T122, T123, T127, T136, T139, T150, T152, T156, T162, T202

9 (Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE

T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

3.3 Impact on Local Amenity

The site has been designed in order to accommodate the most prominent trees within the site, in

particular the trees of landscape value along the site boundary. For this reasons the impact on local

amenity will be very low leaving a new development within a setting of very mature surroundings.

The removal of any dangerous trees will improve the safety of the site.

3.4 Protection of Retained Trees

The successful retention of trees depends on the quality of the protection and the procedures to

ensure any protective measures remain in place.

This is carried out by means of an arboricultural method statement contained within this report; this

is also accompanied by a Tree Protection Plan.

3.5 Trees Within Close Proximity to Structures

When building new structures of any kind within close proximity to trees, it is recommended that a

civil engineer should be appointed to specify the correct foundations and any further measures which

may be required.

10 (Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE

T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

4 Arboricultural Methods Statement and Construction Document

4.1 Introduction

This Method Statement has been drawn up to assist the Local Authority and the developer in

overseeing the construction of the proposed development at Bishopgarth.

This document seeks to list those trees which are proposed for removal and discuss any tree

constraints and implications. It describes the proposals for ensuring retained trees will survive the

development process and thrive after the development has taken place. The development and timing

of construction operations are described, together with materials which would be used in order to

maximize tree protection.

This statement will be included as part of the specification and schedule of works issued to the building

contractor and will form part of the contract. The accompanying arboricultural statement plans will

be available on site for inspection along with this method statement.

4.2 Programme and Phasing of Tree Management

Stage Requirement

1 Carry out agreed tree removal works

2 Carry out demolition works

3 Implement tree protection

4 Carry out construction works

5 Remove tree protection

Stage 1: Carry out agreed tree removal works

All trees/vegetation marked for removal are coded on the Tree Retention Plan to aid arboricultural

contractors identify the correct trees.

All arboricultural operations on site including tree removal must be carried out by an arboricultural

contractor that is able to comply with British Standards 3998: 2010 – Tree Work Recommendations.

All arboricultural contractors should be insured to a minimum of £5 million and able to show

competency by means of relevant certification and health and safety policy.

Because of the location of this site and characteristics of certain trees it is recommended that the

arboricultural contractors have relevant experience of working with protected species, namely bats.

Any qualifications or certification of competency should be sought at the tender stage.

11 (Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE

T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree Removal Works

Due To The Proposal Due To Poor Overall Condition

T61, T83, T120, T142

T9, T57, T67, T77, T78, T89, T90, T124, T125,

T126, T131, T137, T138, T203

T8, T10, T11, T70, T71, T72, T73, T79, T81, T88,

T118, T119, T121, T132, T140

T12, T66, T74, T80, T99, T122, T123, T127,

T136, T139, T150, T152, T156, T162, T202

Tree Pruning Works

Due To The Proposal Due To Poor Overall Condition

- -

Stage 2. Carry out demolition works

During the demolition phase it is important that the trees are protected whilst also giving a safe

working area around the buildings being demolished. For this reason it is recommended that the

tree protection fencing be erected as far from the trees as possible whilst still allowing a safe

working environment. Where there is cross over between Root protection area and working area a

suitable ground protection system need to be laid down to protect any roots that may be within the

area.

There are three retaining walls on site which will need to stay in situ to avoid structural instability of

trees that are to be retained. These can be seen on the tree constraints plans contained within this

report.

Where roots are encountered around foundations of demolished buildings it is recommended that

these stay in situ and are not removed to avoid damage to roots of retained trees. If this is not

possible then it is recommended an arborist be on site to supervise the removal of these

foundations. This may involve root pruning and hand excavation to ensure minimal damage to any

roots of trees to be retained.

Where hard surfaces such as roads are to be removed it is recommended that an arboriculturist

supervise any removal within the root protection area to ensure minimal damage to the rooting area

of any retained trees. This may involve root pruning and hand excavation to ensure minimal damage

to any roots of trees to be retained.

12 (Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE

T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Stage 3. Implement tree protection

Following the completion of the demolition works the tree protection fencing should be erected for

the remainder of the working time on site. The tree protection fencing plan contained within this

document is only indicative of the level of protection that need to be achieved. Once a detail design

proposal is produced it is recommended that a detailed tree protection scheme be produced in order

to achieve satisfactory protection of the retained trees.

Tree protection fencing will need to be installed to protect all trees on the site. The proposed tree

protection fencing can be viewed in Appendix D: Tree Protection Plan.

The fencing will be constructed with a framework of scaffolding poles driven 600mm into the ground,

braced together and with backstays be added at 3m centres. Onto this will be attached a continuous

line of welded mesh panels (alternatively ply or corrugated sheet metal panels may be used) to be

securely fixed with wire or scaffold clamps in accordance with British Standard 5837:2012.

Site Notices on fencing will be used in the form of pre-printed laminated waterproof signs A3 in size

and fixed securely to fencing panels on each enclosure at 9m intervals. The signs will clearly read:

Protected Tree Zone, no storage or operations within fenced off areas. Sample tree protection signs can be

viewed in Appendix F: Tree Protection Fencing.

Any pre-approved excavation works within the Root Protection areas should only be carried out with

consent and instruction from both the developer’s arboriculturalist and the local authority’s tree

officer.

Stage 4. Carry out construction works.

During the construction phase it is important that all staff are aware of the tree protection areas and

their importance during a site induction. If any breach in the tree protection occurs it is the site

manager’s responsibility to report this urgently to the arboricultural consultants so the appropriate

measures can be taken.

Stage 5. Remove stem/tree protection.

When the development is complete, all drainage and service runs are in place and the main site

machinery has been removed, temporary protective fencing will be dismantled. This must be done

with great care and will need to be supervised to avoid heavy machinery being used.

4.3 Additional Notes

Site Storage, Cement Mixing and Washing Points

All site storage areas, cement mixing and washing points for equipment and vehicles must be outside

the RPA and it is recommended that this area is extended to 10 metres away from the protective

fencing in respect to the above. Where there is a risk of polluted water runoff into RPA’s, heavy duty

plastic sheeting and sandbags must be used to contain any spillages and prevent contamination.

13 (Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE

T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Services

All service runs will be aligned to pass outside the RPA’s of the trees so they will have no effect on the trees.

In the rare chance that the need arises to dig within the protective fence lines at any time, the developer’s arboriculturist will liaise with the local authority’s tree officer in order to implement non-destructive trenching methods (open trenching by use of air spade or a mole dig system).

All work to services on site will be undertaken in line with the NJUG “Guidelines for Planning,

Installation and Maintenance of Utility Services in Proximity to Trees”.

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 8500211 E: [email protected] Company Reg No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

5 Appendices

APPENDIX A: TREE DATA

APPENDIX B: TREE CONSTRAINTS PLAN

APPENDIX C: TREE RETENTION PLAN

APPENDIX D: TREE PROTECTION PLAN

APPENDIX E: GLOSSARY OF ARBORICULTURAL TERMS

APPENDIX F: TREE PROTECTION SIGNS

1

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

1 Fraxinus excelsior 18 6 1 68 9 3 5 9 M Good Good -pruning wounds -minor deadwood

<Null> 40> A.1

2 Acer pseudoplatanus

18 6 1 68 8 3 7 3 M Good Good -pruning wounds <Null> 40> A.1

3 Fraxinus excelsior 19 6 1 59 7 3 9 2 M Good Good -pruning wounds -minor deadwood -suppressed

<Null> 31-40 B.1

4 Acer pseudoplatanus

17 8 1 60 6 5 6 3 M Good Good -pruning wounds -included unions

<Null> 40> A.1

Category A Those of high quality and value: in such a condition as to be able to make a substantial contribution (a

minimum of 40 years is suggested)

Category B : Those trees of moderate quality and value: those in such a condition as to make a significant contribution (a minimum of 20 years is suggested)

Category C : Those trees of low quality and value: currently in adequate condition to remain until new planting could be established (a minimum of 10 years is suggested)

Category U : Those in such a condition that any existing value would be lost within 10 years and which should, in the current context, be removed for reasons of sound arboricultural management

KEY:

Tree Numbers/Tags Individual tree = T + number

Group of trees = G + number

Species Common and or scientific names where appropriate

Height Overall tree height

Crown Clearance Overall height of lowest branches from the ground

level

Diameter at breast height Measurement of tree stem

Canopy spread Extents of tree branches taken in compass points

Age Class (Y=Young) ( SM= Semi Mature) (M=Mature)

( OM=Over Mature) (V=Veteran)

Tree Condition Comments on trees overall health etc.

Comments Any further details that may be of importance

Management recs List of urgent works or further investigation that may

be needed

Remaining contribution How long the tree will offer a contribution

Category Rating See opposite table

Within this section is the tree survey data. A lso included is a chart explaining how trees are classed when carrying out a BS 5837:2012 “trees in relation to design demolition and construction” report. Within the appendix is also a glossary of arboricultural terms.

2

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

5 Acer pseudoplatanus

15 6 1 63 4 4 5 6 M Good Good -pruning wounds -minor deadwood

<Null> 40> A.1

6 Acer pseudoplatanus

15 5 1 73 5 4 5 4 M Good Good -pruning wounds <Null> 40> A.1

7 Acer pseudoplatanus

14 5 1 66 6 6 5 3 M Good Good

-damaging boundary wall -pruning wounds -leaning -deadwood

remove if wall is of value

21-30 C.1

8 Acer pseudoplatanus

12 4 1 50 5 5 5 5 M Moderate Good -sparse crown -pruning wounds -deadwood

crown clean 21-30 C.1

9 Taxus baccata 7 1 2 3137

4 4 4 4 M Good Good -included union -minor deadwood

<Null> 40> B.1

10 Acer pseudoplatanus

14 7 1 43 6 5 3 2 M Moderate Good -sparse crown -poor vitality -suppressed

<Null> 21-30 C.1

11 Fraxinus excelsior 13 5 1 39 5 4 4 5 M Moderate Good

-sparse crown -crown decline -minor deadwood -pruning wounds

<Null> 21-30 C.1

12 Crataegus monogyna

6 1 2 3233

3 3 3 3 M Poor Moderate -secere decline -stem decay -deadwood

fell <10 U

13 Acer pseudoplatanus

14 4 1 59 4 4 4 4 M Good Good -deadwood -old severed ivy on stem

<Null> 31-40 B.1

14 Ilex aquifolium 4 1 5 12 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -multi stem -understory tree

<Null> 31-40 C.1

3

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

15 Acer pseudoplatanus

15 6 1 77 5 6 6 3 M Good Good -deadwood -old severed ivy on stem

<Null> 40> A.1

16 Acer pseudoplatanus

12 5 1 38 4 1 5 1 M Good Good

-old severed ivy on stem -suppressed -occluded old stem wound

<Null> 21-30 C.1

17 Acer pseudoplatanus

15 6 1 69 5 5 6 3 M Good Good

-pruning wounds -old severed ivy on stem -BT cable through crown

<Null> 40> A.1

18 Acer platanoides 17 3 1 61 4 3 5 4 M Good Good -BT cable through crown -minor ivy

<Null> 40> A.1

19 Acer platanoides crimson king

6 1 1 19 2 2 2 2 SM Good Good -young tree <Null> 40> B.1

20 Sorbus aria 6 1 1 20 2 2 2 2 SM Good Good -young tree <Null> 31-40 B.1

21 Prunus avium 3 1 1 14 2 2 2 2 SM Good Good -young tree <Null> 21-30 C.1

22 Acer pseudoplatanus

6 1 2 1111

2 2 2 2 SM Good Good -young tree <Null> 40> C.1

23 Acer pseudoplatanus

6 1 1 13 2 2 2 2 SM Good Good -young tree <Null> 40> C.1

24 Prunus avium 3 1 1 19 3 3 3 3 SM Moderate Good -crown decline -poor form

<Null> 21-30 C.1

4

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

25 Prunus avium 4 1 1 18 2 5 5 1 SM Moderate Good -poor form -suppressed -poor vitality

<Null> 11-20 C.1

26 Sorbus aria 7 1 1 28 4 4 4 4 M Good Good -included old tree tie -included unions

<Null> 31-40 B.1

27 Acer pseudoplatanus

7 2 1 26 3 4 4 4 M Good Good

-growing around fence -pruning wounds -very close to adjacent building

remove before damage is caused to building

21-30 C.1

28 Acer pseudoplatanus

6 2 1 16 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -brambles growing into crown

<Null> 21-30 C.1

29 Sorbus aucuparia 3 1 1 9 1 1 1 1 J Good Good -young tree <Null> 40> C.1

30 Acer pseudoplatanus

19 5 1 100 8 8 8 8 M Good Good -pruning wounds <Null> 40> A.1

31 Prunus avium 6 1 1 14 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -no major visible defects

<Null> 40> C.1

32 Acer pseudoplatanus

14 3 2 2535

5 5 5 3 M Good Good -on adjacent land no access

<Null> 40> A.1

33 Fraxinus excelsior 13 2 1 35 5 3 5 3 M Good Good -on adjacent land no access

<Null> 31-40 B.1

34 Quercus pratrea 12 2 1 50 5 5 5 5 M Good Good

-occluded branch damage -on adjacent land no access

<Null> 40> A.1

5

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

35 Acer pseudoplatanus

14 3 1 40 5 3 5 5 M Good Good -on adjacent land no access

<Null> 40> A.1

36 Crataegus monogyna

4 1 6 13 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -multi stem -included unions -rubbing branches

<Null> 21-30 C.1

37 Betula pendula 14 3 1 70 6 6 3 4 M Good Good -trunk fluting -witches broom

<Null> 40> A.1

38 Acer pseudoplatanus

8 1 3 1611

3 1 3 3 M Good Good -suppressed -multi stem

<Null> 21-30 C.1

39 Acer pseudoplatanus

13 4 1 37 4 5 4 4 M Good Good -pruning wounds -minor deadwood

<Null> 31-40 B.1

40 Prunus avium 12 1 1 22 4 4 1 4 M Good Good -no major visible defects

<Null> 31-40 B.1

41 Prunus avium 10 1 1 21 1 4 4 4 M Good Good -no major visible defects

<Null> 31-40 B.1

42 Acer pseudoplatanus

15 2 1 40 4 4 4 4 M Good Good -included union <Null> 40> A.1

43 Betula pendula 13 2 1 30 3 5 2 4 M Good Good -suppressed -included unions

<Null> 31-40 B.1

44 Betula pendula 14 2 1 40 3 5 5 3 M Good Good -suppressed -included union

<Null> 31-40 B.1

6

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

45 Prunus avium 10 2 1 44 5 6 5 5 M Good Good

-included unions -pruning wounds -burrs growing around base/graft

<Null> 31-40 B.1

46 Betula pendula 14 4 1 39 3 4 3 5 M Good Good -minor deadwood -suppressed -poor form

<Null> 31-40 B.1

47 Acer pseudoplatanus

16 5 1 60 6 6 6 6 M Good Good -deadwood <Null> 40> A.1

48 Prunus avium 14 2 3

28 25 22 23

3 4 4 1 M Good Moderate

-included unions -suppressed -water pockets in unions

<Null> 11-20 C.1

49 Prunus avium 4 1 1 13 3 5 3 1 M Good Good -suppressed -poor vitality -sparse crown

<Null> 11-20 C.1

50 Fraxinus excelsior 14 3 1 24 1 1 7 1 M Good Good -poor form -heavily suppressed

<Null> 11-20 C.1

51 Tilia cordata 13 2 1 34 5 5 5 2 M Good Good -no major visible defects

<Null> 40> A.1

52 Alnus glutinosa 6 1 1 14 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -young tree <Null> 40> C.1

53 Crataegus monogyna

6 1 1 54 5 3 5 4 M Good Good -rubbing branches -deadwood -pruning wounds

<Null> 31-40 B.1

54 Fraxinus excelsior 22 3 1 128 15 12 10 12 M Good Good -pruning wounds <Null> 40> A.1

7

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

55 Fraxinus excelsior 22 2 1 84 6 6 6 6 M Good Good -old occluded lightning strike -minor deadwood

<Null> 40> A.1

56 Fraxinus excelsior 22 2 1 95 13 9 8 10 M Good Good -old branch wounds -pruning wounds -minor deadwood

<Null> 40> A.1

57 Pyrus spp. 8 3 1 26 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -no major visible defects

<Null> 31-40 B.1

58 Prunus avium 8 2 1 38 5 5 5 5 M Good Good -root girdling -branch damage

<Null> 11-20 C.1

59 Sorbus aria 10 2 1 32 5 3 5 3 M Good Good -included union -possible canker staining at base

<Null> 31-40 B.1

60 Acer pseudoplatanus Leopoldii

12 2 1 36 6 3 6 3 M Good Good -suppressed <Null> 31-40 B.1

61 Acer pseudoplatanus

16 2 1 67 8 4 4 5 M Good Good -included union <Null> 40> A.1

62 Fraxinus excelsior 11 2 1 38 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -no major visible defects

<Null> 40> A.1

63 Aesculus hippocastanum

13 3 1 116 12 12 12 12 OM Moderate Good

-extensive included unions -severe leaf minor -branch damage -snapped branches -pruning wounds

crown clean 31-40 B.1

64 Prunus weeping 3 1 1 17 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -no major visible defects

<Null> 31-40 B.1

8

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

65 Prunus weeping 3 1 1 16 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -no major visible defects

<Null> 31-40 B.1

66 Sorbus aria 3 1 1 19 2 2 2 2 M Dead Dead -dead tree fell <10 U

67 Prunus avium 5 2 1 24 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -included union -pruning wounds

<Null> 31-40 B.1

68 Aesculus hippocastanum

15 2 1 89 7 6 6 7 M Good Good -extensive leaf minor -pruning wounds

<Null> 40> A.1

69 Acer platanoides Drumondii

10 1 1 26 4 4 4 4 M Good Good -poor form -included union -suppressed

<Null> 21-30 C.1

70 Sorbus aucuparia 7 2 1 21 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -moderate vitality -suckering

<Null> 21-30 C.1

71 Lorell spp 4 1 2 7 9 1 1 2 3 SM Good Good -young tree <Null> 31-40 C.1

72 Sorbus aucuparia 7 1 1 22 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -sparse crown -included unions

<Null> 21-30 C.1

73 Lorell spp 4 1 6 9 2 3 2 3 M Good Good -multi stem -low crown over road

crown raise/ prune back

21-30 C.1

74 Pyrus spp 7 3 1 38 1 4 3 1 M Moderate Moderate -severe decline -stem damage with little regrowth

fell <10 U

9

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

75 Acer pseudoplatanus

13 5 1 52 5 5 5 5 M Good Good -pruning wounds <Null> 40> A.1

76 Fraxinus excelsior 11 2 1 37 3 4 7 5 M Good Good

-pruning wounds -close to building -minor crown decline -minor deadwood

<Null> 31-40 B.1

77 Acer pseudoplatanus

15 3 1 49 4 6 6 7 M Good Good -stem damage -included union -pruning wounds

<Null> 31-40 B.1

78 Fraxinus excelsior 15 5 1 26 4 3 1 3 M Good Good

-minor deadwood -pruning wounds -close to tempory structure

<Null> 31-40 B.1

79 Acer pseudoplatanus

18 5 1 62 6 6 8 6 M Moderate Good -crown decline -deadwood

crown clean 21-30 C.1

80 Fraxinus excelsior 16 5 1 45 6 6 6 2 M Poor Moderate -severe decline -deadwood -possible ground raise

fell <10 U

81 Prunus domestica 5 1 2 12 13

4 4 4 4 M Good Good -in raised bed -if raised bed removed tree would need to go

<Null> 21-30 C.1

82 Ilex aquifolium 6 1 3 19 3 3 3 3 M Good Good

-in raised banking against building -if bank or building removed trees must be also -suppressed

<Null> 21-30 B.1

83 Tilia cordata 18 2 1 85 5 5 5 5 M Good Good

-in banking against building -dense vegetation around base

<Null> 40> A.1

84 Crataegus monogyna

7 2 1 27 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -suppressed -rubbing branches -close to building

<Null> 31-40 C.1

10

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

85 Ilex aquifolium 9 1 4

21 25 17 19

3 3 3 3 M Good Good -multi stem

<Null> 31-40 B.1

86 Ilex aquifolium 12 1 1 41 1 3 3 3 M Good Good -suppressed -included unions

<Null> 31-40 B.1

87 Ilex aquifolium Argentea Marginata

5 1 1 19 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -suppressed <Null> 31-40 B.1

88 Prunus laurocerasus

5 1 4

15 19 7 22

4 4 1 3 M Good Moderate -snapped limbs -pruning wounds

<Null> 21-30 C.1

89 Ilex aquifolium 14 1 2 37 30

4 4 4 4 M Good Good -co-dominant stem -included union

<Null> 31-40 B.1

90 Ilex aquifolium 9 1 1 32 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -dense vegetation around base

<Null> 31-40 B.1

91 Acer pseudoplatanus

9 1 1 21 4 1 1 4 M Good Moderate -on embankment -heavily suppressed

<Null> 21-30 C.1

92 Aesculus hippocastanum

14 1 1 42 5 5 5 5 M Good Good -on embankment -pruning wounds -suppressed

<Null> 31-40 B.1

93 Ulmus glabra 18 4 1 76 6 9 4 5 M Good Good -on embankment -old branch wounds -pruning wounds

<Null> 40> A.1

94 Acer pseudoplatanus

9 5 1 57 3 4 6 8 M Good Good -pruning wounds -on embankment

<Null> 40> A.1

11

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

95 Sorbus aria 8 1 1 24 3 5 2 1 M Good Good -on embankment -suppressed -included union

<Null> 31-40 B.1

96 Acer pseudoplatanus

5 1 1 15 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -suppressed -understory tree

<Null> 21-30 C.1

97 Ilex aquifolium 5 1 3 13 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -suppressed <Null> 21-30 C.1

98 Ulmus glabra 18 5 1 76 5 6 3 1 M Good Good -suppressed <Null> 40> A.1

99 Aesculus hippocastanum

12 1 1 35 4 4 4 4 M Good Good -large stem wound -losing bark -possible canker

<Null> <10 U

100 Aesculus hippocastanum

14 1 1 45 4 5 5 5 M Good Good -ivy on stem -included unions

<Null> 31-40 B.1

101 Acer pseudoplatanus

13 5 1 29 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -very close to railing fence -ivy on stem

<Null> 31-40 B.1

102 Ilex aquifolium 9 1 2 1416

2 2 2 2 M Good Good -suppressed understory tree

<Null> 21-30 C.1

103 Fraxinus excelsior 11 5 1 19 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -no major visible defects

<Null> 31-40 B.1

104 Acer pseudoplatanus

14 6 1 36 5 4 2 3 M Good Good -deadwood <Null> 40> A.1

12

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

105 Aesculus hippocastanum

13 3 1 63 6 6 6 6 M Moderate Good

-severe included unions -leaf minor -bark loss -possible canker -crown decline

<Null> 11-20 C.1

106 Acer pseudoplatanus

14 3 1 36 4 5 1 1 M Good Good -very close to adjacent tree

<Null> 31-40 B.1

107 Acer pseudoplatanus

14 5 2 25 38

4 6 5 5 M Good Good -co-dominant stem -included union -pruning wounds

<Null> 31-40 B.1

108 Taxus baccata 9 2 2 30 39

4 4 4 4 M Good Good -suppressed -included unions -co-dominant stem

<Null> 31-40 B.1

109 Acer pseudoplatanus

16 5 1 48 5 5 5 5 M Good Good -on embankment -pruning wounds

<Null> 31-40 B.1

110 Acer pseudoplatanus

16 5 1 36 4 4 4 4 M Good Good -on embankment -suppressed

<Null> 31-40 B.1

111 Ilex aquifolium 6 1 2 11 14

3 3 3 3 M Good Good -suppressed understory tree

<Null> 21-30 C.1

112 Aesculus hippocastanum

15 2 1 51 4 4 6 5 M Good Good -rubbing branches -on embankment

<Null> 40> A.1

113 Ilex aquifolium 6 1 1 14 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -suppressed understory tree

<Null> 31-40 C.1

114 Ilex aquifolium 6 1 2 11 11

2 2 2 2 M Good Good -suppressed understory tree

<Null> 31-40 C.1

13

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

115 Ulmus glabra 12 4 2 16 20

4 4 4 4 M Good Good -co dominant stem <Null> 31-40 B.1

116 Acer pseudoplatanus

9 2 1 18 2 3 3 2 M Good Good -suppressed <Null> 31-40 B.1

117 Aesculus hippocastanum

8 2 1 17 1 4 4 1 M Good Good -suppressed -unbalanced

<Null> 21-30 C.1

118 Betula pendula Jackamontii

6 1 1 18 3 4 4 6 M Good Good -previously topped <Null> 21-30 C.1

119 Prunus spp 6 1 1 12 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -tree stake still in -basal growth

remove stake and basal growth

21-30 C.1

120 Abies grandis 7 1 1 23 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -no major visible defects

<Null> 40> A.1

121 Laburnum anagyroides

6 2 1 24 3 3 3 3 M Good Moderate -lost limb from structural union

clear up fallen limb 21-30 C.1

122 Malus spp 5 1 1 13 1 2 3 2 SM Poor Good -sparse crown -pruning wounds -in decline

<Null> <10 U

123 Aesculus hippocastanum

12 4 1 58 4 4 4 4 M Moderate Moderate

-bleeding canker -leaf minor -bark loss -crown decline

<Null> <10 U

124 Prunus avium 7 1 2 3032

4 4 4 4 M Good Good -ivy cover -dense vegetation around base

remove ivy 31-40 B.1

14

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

125 Taxus baccata 9 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 M Good Good

-21 24 32 -branches close to building -included unions

prune away from building

31-40 B.1

126 Malus spp 9 3 1 36 5 5 2 3 M Good Good

-branches close to building -pruning wounds -deadwood

<Null> 31-40 B.1

127 Prunus avium 6 3 1 18 4 3 1 2 M Poor Moderate -severe decline <Null> <10 U

128 Ilex aquifolium Argentea Marginata

7 1 1 26 2 1 3 1 M Good Good -included union -suppressed

<Null> 31-40 B.1

129 Ilex aquifolium 7 1 1 19 2 2 3 1 M Good Good -suppressed <Null> 31-40 B.1

130 Thujopsis dolobrata

13 1 1 38 1 6 2 1 M Good Moderate -severe lean <Null> 21-30 C.1

131 Prunus domestica 8 1 1 22 2 3 2 1 M Good Good -stem fluting -pruning wounds

<Null> 31-40 B.1

132 Ilex aquifolium 4 1 1 15 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -pruning wounds <Null> 40> C.1

133 Prunus avium 6 1 1 19 4 4 4 4 M Good Good -included union -pruning wounds -snapped branch

<Null> 31-40 B.1

134 Juniper communis 3 1 3 14 2 1 3 4 M Good Good -in raised bed <Null> 31-40 C.1

15

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

135 Betula pendula 13 1 1 33 6 2 2 3 M Moderate Good -in decline -deadwood

<Null> 21-30 C.1

136 Acer pseudoplatanus

13 3 1 44 5 5 7 3 M Moderate Good

- in decline -minor deadwood -poor vigor -wounds not occluding

fell <10 U

137 Ilex aquifolium 9 1 9 15 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -included unions <Null> 31-40 B.1

138 Sorbus aria 10 2 1 33 5 2 3 3 M Moderate Good -included unions -crown dieback -deadwood

<Null> 21-30 C.1

139 Aesculus hippocastanum

10 5 1 73 7 6 5 5 M Moderate Good -crown decline -deadwood -pruning wounds

fell <10 U

140 Acer pseudoplatanus

16 4 1 51 6 6 4 7 M Poor Moderate -large deadwood over road -pruning wounds

crown clean 21-30 C.1

141 Fraxinus excelsior 10 2 1 29 4 3 2 3 M Good Good -suppressed -leaning

<Null> 31-40 B.1

142 Tilia cordata 17 1 1 47 4 4 4 4 M Good Good -deadwood over road crown clean 40> A.1

143 Aesculus hippocastanum

9 1 1 37 6 3 7 4 M Good Good -heavily suppressed -poor form

<Null> 21-30 C.1

144 Acer pseudoplatanus

15 1 1 40 2 2 5 2 M Good Good -suppressed -poor form -deadwood

crown clean 31-40 B.1

16

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

145 Ulmus glabra 18 3 1 38 9 5 2 5 M Moderate Good -crown decline -deadwood

Crown clean 21-30 C.1

146 Ulmus glabra 16 2 1 48 3 4 9 4 M Good Good -minor crown dieback -leaning -suppressed

<Null> 31-40 B.1

147 Sorbus aria 15 1 1 40 5 2 1 5 M Good Good -suppressed -unbalanced crown

<Null> 31-40 A.1

148 Ulmus glabra 18 1 1 56 6 5 8 6 M Good Good -basal epicormic growth -deadwood

<Null> 40> A.1

149 Aesculus hippocastanum

7 2 1 25 4 3 4 3 M Good Good -young tree <Null> 40> B.1

150 Ulmus glabra 18 4 1 63 6 6 8 6 M Poor Moderate -severe decline -deadwood over road

fell urgent <10 U

151 Sorbus aria 18 1 1 40 6 4 3 4 M Good Good -suppressed <Null> 40> A.1

152 Laburnum anagyroides

3 1 1 14 4 4 1 1 M Poor Moderate -decline -deadwood -hollowing

<Null> <10 U

153 Acer platanoides 17 1 1 58 6 5 10 5 M Good Good -included union -minor epicormic growth

<Null> 40> A.1

154 Crataegus monogyna

7 1 1 29 5 3 2 3 M Good Good -suppressed -included unions -stem hollowing

<Null> 31-40 B.1

17

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

155 Aesculus hippocastanum

13 2 1 44 3 4 6 3 M Good Moderate -increment strips -bleeding canker -bark cracks

<Null> 11-20 C.1

156 Aesculus hippocastanum

16 2 2 31 45

7 6 9 2 M Good Moderate -severe included union -bleeding canker -cracked bark

fell <10 U

157 Acer pseudoplatanus

19 2 1 63 3 6 7 5 M Good Good -pruning wounds -deadwood

<Null> 40> A.1

158 Acer pseudoplatanus

18 2 1 61 8 4 6 9 M Good Good -basal epicormic -minor deadwood

<Null> 40> A.1

159 Sorbus aria 15 3 1 56 7 5 5 5 M Good Good -included union <Null> 40> A.1

160 Fagus sylvatica purpurea

20 2 1 93 8 8 6 8 M Good Good --no major visible defects

<Null> 40> A.1

161 Acer pseudoplatanus

17 3 1 56 7 5 5 6 M Moderate Good -deadwood crown clean 31-40 B.1

162 Acer pseudoplatanus

15 2 1 54 1 4 5 4 M Poor Moderate -severe decline -deadwood

fell urgent <10 U

163 Quercus cerris 15 2 1 29 5 5 5 4 M Good Good -minor deadwood <Null> 40> A.1

164 Acer pseudoplatanus

19 5 1 64 5 5 5 5 M Good Good -basal epicormic growth

<Null> 40> A.1

18

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

165 Aesculus hippocastanum

12 1 1 40 6 4 6 6 M Good Good -leaf miner -minor deadwood

<Null> 40> A.1

166 Acer pseudoplatanus

10 2 1 49 8 6 5 5 M Moderate Good

-co-dominant stem -crown dieback -deadwood -suppressed

<Null> 21-30 C.1

167 Acer pseudoplatanus

18 5 1 60 5 4 9 6 M Good Good

-basal epicormic growth -deadwood -pruning wounds

<Null> 40> A.1

168 Fraxinus excelsior 4 1 1 10 3 2 1 2 SM Good Good -Berberis around base <Null> 40> C.1

169 Acer pseudoplatanus

17 4 1 43 6 6 6 2 M Good Good -suppressed -historic stem damage

<Null> 40> A.1

170 Tilia cordata 17 1 1 64 6 6 6 6 M Good Good -basal epicormic growth

<Null> 40> A.1

171 Prunus laurocerasus

5 1 1 35 6 6 5 6 M Good Good -included unions minor deadwood

<Null> 31-40 B.1

172 Ilex aquifolium 8 1 1 25 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -active bird nest <Null> 31-40 B.1

173 Tilia cordata 18 2 1 72 7 7 5 5 M Good Good -deadwood -storm damage -branch decay

crown clean 40> A.1

174 Ilex aquifolium 6 2 3 17 17 11

3 3 3 3 M Good Good -No major visible defects

<Null> 31-40 B.1

19

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

175 Acer pseudoplatanus

17 3 1 64 6 6 6 6 M Good Good -minor deadwood -branches touching building

crown clean and raise above building

40> A.1

176 Acer pseudoplatanus

17 5 1 60 3 6 5 5 M Good Good -on raised area which must be retained to retain trees

<Null> 40> A.1

177 Tilia cordata 19 1 1 68 4 8 5 4 M Good Good -deadwood -basal epicormic growth

remove dead limb 40> A.1

178 Acer pseudoplatanus

17 6 1 49 5 5 5 5 M Good Good -occluded branch wounds

<Null> 40> A.1

179 Ilex aquifolium 8 1 1 19 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -no major visible defects

<Null> 40> A.1

180 Ilex aquifolium 8 1 3 14 10 9

2 2 2 2 SM Good Good -multi stem

<Null> 40> C.1

181 Ilex aquifolium 11 1 1 28 4 4 4 4 M Good Good -dense vegetation around base unable to inspect

<Null> 31-40 B.1

182 Acer pseudoplatanus

9 3 1 21 3 3 3 3 M Moderate Good -minor deadwood -poor vigor

<Null> 21-30 C.1

183 Acer pseudoplatanus

12 2 1 24 3 5 2 3 M Good Good -ivy on stem <Null> 40> B.1

184 Acer pseudoplatanus

14 3 1 28 2 5 3 4 M Good Good -suppressed -ivy on stem

<Null> 31-40 B.1

20

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

185 Acer pseudoplatanus

15 5 1 36 1 1 4 6 M Good Good -on embankment <Null> 21-30 C.1

186 Aesculus hippocastanum

16 1 1 47 2 6 4 4 M Good Good -pruning wounds -include unions

<Null> 31-40 B.1

187 Aesculus hippocastanum

17 4 1 66 6 6 4 7 M Good Good -pruning wounds -snapped branches

<Null> 31-40 A.1

188 Acer pseudoplatanus

16 6 1 42 4 4 4 4 M Good Good -on embankment -ivy

<Null> 31-40 B.1

189 Aesculus hippocastanum

9 2 1 18 2 4 4 3 M Good Good -suppressed <Null> 21-30 C.1

190 Aesculus hippocastanum

10 2 1 33 2 10 5 1 M Good Good -heavily suppressed -poor form -pruning wounds

<Null> 21-30 C.1

191 Ulmus glabra 20 6 1 59 6 7 8 5 M Good Good -ivy on stem remove ivy re-inspect 40> A.1

192 Sorbus aria 18 6 1 51 5 2 6 4 M Good Good -ivy on stem remove ivy 40> A.1

193 Ulmus glabra 20 6 1 70 6 6 6 6 M Good Good -no access to stem -ivy

remove ivy 40> A.1

194 Acer pseudoplatanus

16 6 1 32 5 5 5 5 M Good Good -severe ivy -poor form

remove ivy 31-40 B.1

21

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Tree No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

195 Acer pseudoplatanus

18 6 1 45 5 5 5 5 M Good Good -severe ivy unable to assess

<Null> 40> A.1

196 Acer pseudoplatanus

18 6 1 45 5 5 5 5 M Good Good -severe ivy unable to assess

remove ivy 40> A.1

197 Sorbus aria 15 6 1 43 4 4 4 5 M Good Good -severe ivy unable to assess

remove ivy 40> A.1

198 Acer pseudoplatanus

20 5 1 51 5 5 8 4 M Good Good -behind retaining wall <Null> 31-40 B.1

199 Tilia cordata 8 1 1 18 2 3 4 4 M Good Good -young tree <Null> 31-40 B.1

200 Acer pseudoplatanus

20 4 5

36 36 38 47 27

4 5 7 5 M Good Good

-multi stem -included unions -deadwood -pruning wounds

<Null> 40> A.1

201 Acer pseudoplatanus

19 4 1 51 8 7 4 2 M Good Good -included union -pruning wounds

<Null> 40> A.1

202 Juniper 4 1 2 15 15

5 1 1 2 M Moderate Poor -collapsed -split union

fell <10 U

203 Sorbus aria 7 2 1 27 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -young tree <Null> 40> B.1

22

(Head Office) The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE T: 0161 4061862 E: [email protected] Company Reg. No. 7514654 VAT No.109428515

Group No.

Species Height

(m)

Crown clearance

(m)

No. of

trees

DBH (cm)

N E S W Age

Class Phys.

Condition Structural Condition

Condition comments Preliminary

management recommendations

Rem. Con.

Category

G1 x Cupressocyparis leylandii

5 1 5 20 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -unmanaged hedge in adjacent land

<Null> 31-40 B.1

G2 Ilex aquifolium 6 1 4 16 3 3 3 3 M Good Good -suppressed understory trees

<Null> 11-20 C.1

G3 Ilex aquifolium and Acer pseudoplatanus

6 1 10 18 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -dense planting <Null> 21-30 C.1

G4 Mixed 8 1 6 12 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -dense ivy no access to stems

remove ivy 31-40 C.1

G5 Acer pseudoplatanus

18 6 5 35 4 4 4 4 M Good Good -very close together -severe ivy

remove ivy 40> A.1

G6 x Cupressocyparis leylandii

6 1 38 14 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -large screen hedge <Null> 31-40 C.1

H1 Ligustrum angustifolium

3 1 100 10 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -well managed hedge <Null> 40> A.1

H2 Ligustrum angustifolium

3 1 50 10 2 2 2 2 M Good Good -well managed hedge <Null> 40> A.1

433025E

433075E

433125E

433150E

421725N

421750N

421775N

421825N

433000E

433050E

433100E

421700N

421800N

433000E

433025E

433075E

433100E

433125E

433150E

421675N

433050E

433175E

421675N

421700N

421725N

421750N

421775N

Ref. 1Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 2Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 3Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 4 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 18

Ref. 19Acer platanoides crimson king

Ref. 20Sorbus aria

Ref. 21Prunus avium

Ref. 22Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 23Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 24Prunus avium

Ref. 25Prunus avium

Ref. 26Sorbus aria

Ref. 27Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 28Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 29Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 30Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 31Prunus avium

Ref. 32Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 33Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 34Quercus pratrae

Ref. 35Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 36Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 37Betula pendula

Ref. 38Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 39Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 40Prunus avium

Ref. 41Prunus avium

Ref. 42Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 43Betula pendula

Ref. 44Betula pendula

Ref. 45Prunus avium

Ref. 46Betula pendula

Ref. 47Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 48Prunus avium

Ref. 49Prunus avium

Ref. 50Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 51Tilia cordata

Ref. 52Alnus glutinosa

Ref. 53Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 54Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 55Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 56Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 57Pyrus spp.

Ref. 58Prunus avium

Ref. 59Sorbus aria

Ref. 60Acer pseudoplatanus drumondii

Ref. 61Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 62Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 63Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 64Prunus weeping

Ref. 65Prunus weeping

Ref. 66Sorbus aria

Ref. 67Prunus avium

Ref. 68Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 69Acer platanoides leopoldii

Ref. 70Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 71lorell spp

Ref. 72Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 73Lorell spp

Ref. 74Pyrus spp

Ref. 118Betula pendula jackamontii

Ref. 119Prunus spp

Ref. 120Abies grandis

Ref. 121Laburnam vulgare

Ref. 122Malus spp

Aesculus hippocastanum

Aesculus hippocastanum

Ulmus glabra

Ref. 192Sorbus aria

Ulmus glabra

Ref. 194Acer pseudo platanus

Ref. 195Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 196Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 197Sorbus aria

Ref. 198Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 199Tilia cordata

Ref. 200Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 201Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 202Juniper

Ref. 203Sorbus aria

Ref. G1

Ref. G6

Ref. G4

Ref. G7

Ref. H1

Ref. H2

BS5837:2005 Trees in relation to construction - Categories and definitions

Trees for removal

U: Identification on Plan - RED - Those in such a condition that any existing value would be lost within

10 years and which should, in the current context, be removed for reasons of sound Arboricultural

management.

Criteria

Trees that have a serious, irremediable, structural defect, such that their early loss is expected due to

collapse, including those that will become enviable after removal of other R category trees (i.e. where,

for whatever reason, theloss of companion shelter cannot be mitigated by pruning)

Trees that are dead or are showing signs of significant, immediate, and irreversible

overall decline

Trees infected with pathogens of significance to the health and/or safety of other trees

nearby (e.g. Dutch elm disease),or very low quality trees suppressing adjacent trees of better quality

NOTE: Habitat reinstatement may be appropriate (e.g. R category tree used as a bat roost: installation

of bat box in nearby tree)

Trees to be considered for retention

A: Identification on Plan - LIGHT GREEN - Those of high quality and value: in such a condition as to be

able to make a substantial contribution (a minimum of 40 years is suggested)

B: Identification on Plan - MID BLUE - Those of moderate quality and value: those in such a condition

as to make a significant contribution (a minimum of 20 years is suggested.

C: Identification on Plan - GREY - Those of low quality and value: currently in adequate condition to

remain until new planting could be established (a minimum of 10 years is suggested), or young trees

with a stem diameter below 150mm

Category C trees will usually not be retained where they would impose a significant constraint on

development. Young trees with a stem diameter of less than 150 mm should be considered for

relocation. Category A and B trees will normally be retained

Criteria - Subcategories

The following subcategories are applied. Trees may be allocated more than one subcategory, but this

will not increase their overall value

1: Mainly Arboricultural values

A1: Trees that are particularly good examples of their species, especially if rare or unusual, or essential

components of groups, or formal or semi-formal Arboricultural features (e.g. the dominant and/or

principal trees within an avenue)

B1: Trees that might be included in the high category, but are downgraded because of impaired

condition (e.g. presence of remediable defects including unsympathetic past management and minor

storm damage)

C1: Trees not qualifying in higher categories

2: Mainly landscape values

A2: Trees, groups or woodlands which provide a definite screening or softening effect to the locality in

relation to views into or out of the site, or those of particular visual importance (e.g. avenues or other

arboricultural features assessed as groups)

B2: Trees present in numbers, usually as groups or woodlands, such that they form distinct landscape

features, thereby attracting a higher collective rating than they might as individuals but which are not,

individually, essential components of formal or semi-formal arboricultural features (e.g. trees of

moderate quality within an avenue that includes better, 'A' category specimens), or trees situated

mainly internally to the site, therefore individually having little visual impact on the wider locality

C2: Trees present in groups or woodlands, but without this conferring on them significantly greater

landscape value, and/or trees offering low or only temporary screening benefit

3: Mainly cultural values, including conservation

A3: Trees, groups or woodlands of significant conservation, historical, commemorative or other value

(e.g. veteran trees or wood-pasture)

B3: Trees with clearly identifiable conservation or other cultural benefits

C3: Trees with very limited conservation or other cultural benefits

Copyright & Usage Notice

This drawing remains the the property & copyright of Christians Environmental Ltd

until payment in full is received.

Any use of this drawing before payment is received unless by prior agreement will be

deemed as misuse & will be pursued as necessary.

General Notice

This drawing to be read in conjunction with all other relevantinformation whether

produced by Christians Environmental Ltd or by others. Any inconsistencies to be

notified to the company immediately

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE

drawing number

scale drawn date

drawing title

project

client

rev

1:250 @ A1 CEL-TW Jul 2014

ABPH-TCP-001

RSK

Bishopgarth Police Training Headquarters

Tree Constraints Plan

rev date description by

Christians Environmental Ltd

12 Centenary Park

Coronet Way

Eccles

Salford

Manchester

M50 1RE

t: +44 (0) 161 8500211

e: [email protected]

w: www.christiansltd.com

A Jul 2014 Tree Constraints Plan CEL-TW

1050

Meters

1:250

5

KEY:

Surveyed tree

- category A

Surveyed tree

- category B

Surveyed tree

- category C

Surveyed tree

- category U

Surveyed tree

- extents of root protection area (RPA)

Surveyed group of trees

-Category A

Existing building

and/or topographical feature

Surveyed group of trees

-Category B

Surveyed group of trees

-Category C

Retaining Wall affecting trees

432975E

433025E

433075E

433125E

421700N

421725N

432950E

433000E

433050E

433100E

432950E

432975E

433000E

433025E

433075E

433100E

433125E

421625N

421675N

433050E

421600N

421650N

Ref. 57Pyrus spp.

Ref. 58Prunus avium

Ref. 59Sorbus aria

Ref. 60Acer pseudoplatanus drumondii

Ref. 61Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 62Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 63Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 64Prunus weeping

Ref. 65Prunus weeping

Ref. 66Sorbus aria

Ref. 67Prunus avium

Ref. 68Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 70Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 71lorell spp

Ref. 72Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 73Lorell spp

Ref. 74Pyrus spp

Ref. 75Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 76Fraxinus excelsiorRef. 77Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 78Fraxinud excelsior

Ref. 79Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 80Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 81Prunus domestica

Ref. 82Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 83Tilia cordata

Ref. 84Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 85Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 86Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 87Ilex aquifolium varigata

Ref. 88Prunus laurocerasus

Ref. 89Ilex aquifolim

Ref. 90Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 91Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 92Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 93Ulmus glabra

Ref. 94Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 95Sorbus aria

Ref. 96Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 97Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 98Ulmus glabra

Ref. 99Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 100Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 101Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 102Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 103Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 104Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 105Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 106Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 107Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 118Betula pendula jackamontii

Ref. 119Prunus spp

Ref. 120Abies grandis

Ref. 121Laburnam vulgare

Ref. 122Malus spp

Ref. 125Taxus baccata

Ref. 126Malus spp

Ref. 127Prunus avium

Ref. 128Ilex aquifolium varigata

Ref. 129Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 130Thujopsis dolobrata

Ref. 131Prunus domestica

Ref. 132Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 133Prunus avium

Ref. 176Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 177Tilia cordata

Ref. 178Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 179Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 180Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 181Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 182Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 183Acer pseudoplatansu

Ref. 184Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 185Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 186Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 187Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 188Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 189Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 190Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 191Ulmus glabra

Ref. 192Sorbus aria

Ref. 193Ulmus glabra

Ref. 194Acer pseudo platanus

Ref. 195Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 196Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 197Sorbus aria

Ref. 198Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 199Tilia cordata

Ref. 200Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 201Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 202Juniper

Ref. 203Sorbus aria

Ref. G6

Ref. G4

BS5837:2005 Trees in relation to construction - Categories and definitions

Trees for removal

U: Identification on Plan - RED - Those in such a condition that any existing value would be lost within

10 years and which should, in the current context, be removed for reasons of sound Arboricultural

management.

Criteria

Trees that have a serious, irremediable, structural defect, such that their early loss is expected due to

collapse, including those that will become enviable after removal of other R category trees (i.e. where,

for whatever reason, theloss of companion shelter cannot be mitigated by pruning)

Trees that are dead or are showing signs of significant, immediate, and irreversible

overall decline

Trees infected with pathogens of significance to the health and/or safety of other trees

nearby (e.g. Dutch elm disease),or very low quality trees suppressing adjacent trees of better quality

NOTE: Habitat reinstatement may be appropriate (e.g. R category tree used as a bat roost: installation

of bat box in nearby tree)

Trees to be considered for retention

A: Identification on Plan - LIGHT GREEN - Those of high quality and value: in such a condition as to be

able to make a substantial contribution (a minimum of 40 years is suggested)

B: Identification on Plan - MID BLUE - Those of moderate quality and value: those in such a condition

as to make a significant contribution (a minimum of 20 years is suggested.

C: Identification on Plan - GREY - Those of low quality and value: currently in adequate condition to

remain until new planting could be established (a minimum of 10 years is suggested), or young trees

with a stem diameter below 150mm

Category C trees will usually not be retained where they would impose a significant constraint on

development. Young trees with a stem diameter of less than 150 mm should be considered for

relocation. Category A and B trees will normally be retained

Criteria - Subcategories

The following subcategories are applied. Trees may be allocated more than one subcategory, but this

will not increase their overall value

1: Mainly Arboricultural values

A1: Trees that are particularly good examples of their species, especially if rare or unusual, or essential

components of groups, or formal or semi-formal Arboricultural features (e.g. the dominant and/or

principal trees within an avenue)

B1: Trees that might be included in the high category, but are downgraded because of impaired

condition (e.g. presence of remediable defects including unsympathetic past management and minor

storm damage)

C1: Trees not qualifying in higher categories

2: Mainly landscape values

A2: Trees, groups or woodlands which provide a definite screening or softening effect to the locality in

relation to views into or out of the site, or those of particular visual importance (e.g. avenues or other

arboricultural features assessed as groups)

B2: Trees present in numbers, usually as groups or woodlands, such that they form distinct landscape

features, thereby attracting a higher collective rating than they might as individuals but which are not,

individually, essential components of formal or semi-formal arboricultural features (e.g. trees of

moderate quality within an avenue that includes better, 'A' category specimens), or trees situated

mainly internally to the site, therefore individually having little visual impact on the wider locality

C2: Trees present in groups or woodlands, but without this conferring on them significantly greater

landscape value, and/or trees offering low or only temporary screening benefit

3: Mainly cultural values, including conservation

A3: Trees, groups or woodlands of significant conservation, historical, commemorative or other value

(e.g. veteran trees or wood-pasture)

B3: Trees with clearly identifiable conservation or other cultural benefits

C3: Trees with very limited conservation or other cultural benefits

Copyright & Usage Notice

This drawing remains the the property & copyright of Christians Environmental Ltd

until payment in full is received.

Any use of this drawing before payment is received unless by prior agreement will be

deemed as misuse & will be pursued as necessary.

General Notice

This drawing to be read in conjunction with all other relevantinformation whether

produced by Christians Environmental Ltd or by others. Any inconsistencies to be

notified to the company immediately

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE

drawing number

scale drawn date

drawing title

project

client

rev

1:250 @ A1 CEL-TW Jul 2014

ABPH-TCP-002

RSK

Bishopgarth Police Training Headquarters

Tree Constraints Plan

rev date description by

Christians Environmental Ltd

12 Centenary Park

Coronet Way

Eccles

Salford

Manchester

M50 1RE

t: +44 (0) 161 8500211

e: [email protected]

w: www.christiansltd.com

A Jul 2014 Tree Constraints Plan CEL-TW

1050

Meters

1:250

5

KEY:

Surveyed tree

- category A

Surveyed tree

- category B

Surveyed tree

- category C

Surveyed tree

- category U

Surveyed tree

- extents of root protection area (RPA)

Surveyed group of trees

-Category A

Existing building

and/or topographical feature

Surveyed group of trees

-Category B

Surveyed group of trees

-Category C

Retaining Wall affecting trees

421575N

421625N

421550N

421600N

421650N

Ref. 74Pyrus spp

Ref. 75Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 76Fraxinus excelsiorRef. 77Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 78Fraxinud excelsior

Ref. 79Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 80Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 81Prunus domestica

Ref. 82Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 83Tilia cordata

Ref. 84Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 85Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 86Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 87Ilex aquifolium varigata

Ref. 88Prunus laurocerasus

Ref. 89Ilex aquifolim

Ref. 90Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 91Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 92Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 93Ulmus glabra

Ref. 94Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 95Sorbus aria

Ref. 96Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 97Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 98Ulmus glabra

Ref. 99Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 100Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 101Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 102Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 103Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 104Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 105Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 106Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 107Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 108Taxus baccata

Ref. 109Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 110Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 111Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 112Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 113Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 114Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 115Ulmus glabra

Ref. 116Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 117Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 123Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 124Prunus avium

Ref. 125Taxus baccata

Ref. 126Malus spp

Ref. 127Prunus avium

Ref. 128Ilex aquifolium varigata

Ref. 129Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 130Thujopsis dolobrata

Ref. 131Prunus domestica

Ref. 132Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 133Prunus avium

Ref. 134Juniper

Ref. 135Betula pendula

Ref. 136Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 137Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 138Sorbus aria

Ref. 139Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 140Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 141Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 142Tilia cordata

Ref. 143Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 144Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 145Ulmus glabra

Ref. 146Ulmus glabra

Ref. 147Sorbus aria

Ref. 148Ulmus glabra

Ref. 149Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 150Ulmus glabra

Ref. 151Sorbus aria

Ref. 152Laburnum vulgare

Ref. 153Acer platanoides

Ref. 154Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 155Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 156Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 157Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 158Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 159Sorbus aria

Ref. 160Fagus sylvatic purpurea

Ref. 161Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 162Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 163Quercus ceris

Ref. 164Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 165Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 166Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 167Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 168Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 169Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 170Tilia cordata

Ref. 171Prunus laurocerasus

Ref. 172Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 173Tilia cordata

Ref. 174Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 175Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 176Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 177Tilia cordata

Ref. 178Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 179Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 180Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 181Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 182Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 183Acer pseudoplatansu

Ref. G3

BS5837:2005 Trees in relation to construction - Categories and definitions

Trees for removal

U: Identification on Plan - RED - Those in such a condition that any existing value would be lost within

10 years and which should, in the current context, be removed for reasons of sound Arboricultural

management.

Criteria

Trees that have a serious, irremediable, structural defect, such that their early loss is expected due to

collapse, including those that will become enviable after removal of other R category trees (i.e. where,

for whatever reason, theloss of companion shelter cannot be mitigated by pruning)

Trees that are dead or are showing signs of significant, immediate, and irreversible

overall decline

Trees infected with pathogens of significance to the health and/or safety of other trees

nearby (e.g. Dutch elm disease),or very low quality trees suppressing adjacent trees of better quality

NOTE: Habitat reinstatement may be appropriate (e.g. R category tree used as a bat roost: installation

of bat box in nearby tree)

Trees to be considered for retention

A: Identification on Plan - LIGHT GREEN - Those of high quality and value: in such a condition as to be

able to make a substantial contribution (a minimum of 40 years is suggested)

B: Identification on Plan - MID BLUE - Those of moderate quality and value: those in such a condition

as to make a significant contribution (a minimum of 20 years is suggested.

C: Identification on Plan - GREY - Those of low quality and value: currently in adequate condition to

remain until new planting could be established (a minimum of 10 years is suggested), or young trees

with a stem diameter below 150mm

Category C trees will usually not be retained where they would impose a significant constraint on

development. Young trees with a stem diameter of less than 150 mm should be considered for

relocation. Category A and B trees will normally be retained

Criteria - Subcategories

The following subcategories are applied. Trees may be allocated more than one subcategory, but this

will not increase their overall value

1: Mainly Arboricultural values

A1: Trees that are particularly good examples of their species, especially if rare or unusual, or essential

components of groups, or formal or semi-formal Arboricultural features (e.g. the dominant and/or

principal trees within an avenue)

B1: Trees that might be included in the high category, but are downgraded because of impaired

condition (e.g. presence of remediable defects including unsympathetic past management and minor

storm damage)

C1: Trees not qualifying in higher categories

2: Mainly landscape values

A2: Trees, groups or woodlands which provide a definite screening or softening effect to the locality in

relation to views into or out of the site, or those of particular visual importance (e.g. avenues or other

arboricultural features assessed as groups)

B2: Trees present in numbers, usually as groups or woodlands, such that they form distinct landscape

features, thereby attracting a higher collective rating than they might as individuals but which are not,

individually, essential components of formal or semi-formal arboricultural features (e.g. trees of

moderate quality within an avenue that includes better, 'A' category specimens), or trees situated

mainly internally to the site, therefore individually having little visual impact on the wider locality

C2: Trees present in groups or woodlands, but without this conferring on them significantly greater

landscape value, and/or trees offering low or only temporary screening benefit

3: Mainly cultural values, including conservation

A3: Trees, groups or woodlands of significant conservation, historical, commemorative or other value

(e.g. veteran trees or wood-pasture)

B3: Trees with clearly identifiable conservation or other cultural benefits

C3: Trees with very limited conservation or other cultural benefits

Copyright & Usage Notice

This drawing remains the the property & copyright of Christians Environmental Ltd

until payment in full is received.

Any use of this drawing before payment is received unless by prior agreement will be

deemed as misuse & will be pursued as necessary.

General Notice

This drawing to be read in conjunction with all other relevantinformation whether

produced by Christians Environmental Ltd or by others. Any inconsistencies to be

notified to the company immediately

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE

drawing number

scale drawn date

drawing title

project

client

rev

1:250 @ A1 CEL-TW Jul 2014

ABPH-TCP-003

RSK

Bishopgarth Police Training Headquarters

Tree Constraints Plan

rev date description by

Christians Environmental Ltd

12 Centenary Park

Coronet Way

Eccles

Salford

Manchester

M50 1RE

t: +44 (0) 161 8500211

e: [email protected]

w: www.christiansltd.com

A Jul 2014 Tree Constraints Plan CEL-TW

1050

Meters

1:250

5

KEY:

Surveyed tree

- category A

Surveyed tree

- category B

Surveyed tree

- category C

Surveyed tree

- category U

Surveyed tree

- extents of root protection area (RPA)

Surveyed group of trees

-Category A

Existing building

and/or topographical feature

Surveyed group of trees

-Category B

Surveyed group of trees

-Category C

Retaining Wall affecting trees

433075E

433125E

433150E

421725N

421750N

421775N

433100E

421700N

433075E

433100E

433125E

433150E

421625N

421650N

421675N

433175E

433175E

433225E

433225E

433250E

433250E

421650N

421675N

421700N

421725N

421750N

421775N

433200E

433200E

Ref. 1Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 2 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 3Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 4 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 5 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 6 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 7 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 8 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 9Taxus baccata

Ref. 10Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 11Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 12Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 13Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 14Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 15Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 16Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 17Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 18Acer platanoides

Ref. 19Acer platanoides crimson king

Ref. 20Sorbus aria

Ref. 21Prunus avium

Ref. 22Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 23Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 24Prunus avium

Ref. 25Prunus avium

Ref. 26Sorbus aria

Ref. 27Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 28Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 29Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 30Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 31Prunus avium

Alnus glutinosa

Ref. 53Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 54Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 55Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 56Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 57Pyrus spp.

Ref. 58Prunus avium

Ref. 59Sorbus aria

Ref. 60Acer pseudoplatanus drumondii

Ref. 61Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 62Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 63Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 64Prunus weeping

Ref. 65Prunus weeping

Ref. 66Sorbus aria

Ref. 67Prunus avium

Ref. 68Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 69Acer platanoides leopoldii

Ref. 70Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 71lorell spp

Ref. 72Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 73Lorell spp

Ref. 74Pyrus spp

Ref. 75Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 76Fraxinus excelsiorRef. 77Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 78Fraxinud excelsior

Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 80Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 81Prunus domestica

Ref. 181Ilex aquifolium

Ref. G1

Ref. G7

Ref. H1

Ref. H2

BS5837:2005 Trees in relation to construction - Categories and definitions

Trees for removal

U: Identification on Plan - RED - Those in such a condition that any existing value would be lost within

10 years and which should, in the current context, be removed for reasons of sound Arboricultural

management.

Criteria

Trees that have a serious, irremediable, structural defect, such that their early loss is expected due to

collapse, including those that will become enviable after removal of other R category trees (i.e. where,

for whatever reason, theloss of companion shelter cannot be mitigated by pruning)

Trees that are dead or are showing signs of significant, immediate, and irreversible

overall decline

Trees infected with pathogens of significance to the health and/or safety of other trees

nearby (e.g. Dutch elm disease),or very low quality trees suppressing adjacent trees of better quality

NOTE: Habitat reinstatement may be appropriate (e.g. R category tree used as a bat roost: installation

of bat box in nearby tree)

Trees to be considered for retention

A: Identification on Plan - LIGHT GREEN - Those of high quality and value: in such a condition as to be

able to make a substantial contribution (a minimum of 40 years is suggested)

B: Identification on Plan - MID BLUE - Those of moderate quality and value: those in such a condition

as to make a significant contribution (a minimum of 20 years is suggested.

C: Identification on Plan - GREY - Those of low quality and value: currently in adequate condition to

remain until new planting could be established (a minimum of 10 years is suggested), or young trees

with a stem diameter below 150mm

Category C trees will usually not be retained where they would impose a significant constraint on

development. Young trees with a stem diameter of less than 150 mm should be considered for

relocation. Category A and B trees will normally be retained

Criteria - Subcategories

The following subcategories are applied. Trees may be allocated more than one subcategory, but this

will not increase their overall value

1: Mainly Arboricultural values

A1: Trees that are particularly good examples of their species, especially if rare or unusual, or essential

components of groups, or formal or semi-formal Arboricultural features (e.g. the dominant and/or

principal trees within an avenue)

B1: Trees that might be included in the high category, but are downgraded because of impaired

condition (e.g. presence of remediable defects including unsympathetic past management and minor

storm damage)

C1: Trees not qualifying in higher categories

2: Mainly landscape values

A2: Trees, groups or woodlands which provide a definite screening or softening effect to the locality in

relation to views into or out of the site, or those of particular visual importance (e.g. avenues or other

arboricultural features assessed as groups)

B2: Trees present in numbers, usually as groups or woodlands, such that they form distinct landscape

features, thereby attracting a higher collective rating than they might as individuals but which are not,

individually, essential components of formal or semi-formal arboricultural features (e.g. trees of

moderate quality within an avenue that includes better, 'A' category specimens), or trees situated

mainly internally to the site, therefore individually having little visual impact on the wider locality

C2: Trees present in groups or woodlands, but without this conferring on them significantly greater

landscape value, and/or trees offering low or only temporary screening benefit

3: Mainly cultural values, including conservation

A3: Trees, groups or woodlands of significant conservation, historical, commemorative or other value

(e.g. veteran trees or wood-pasture)

B3: Trees with clearly identifiable conservation or other cultural benefits

C3: Trees with very limited conservation or other cultural benefits

Copyright & Usage Notice

This drawing remains the the property & copyright of Christians Environmental Ltd

until payment in full is received.

Any use of this drawing before payment is received unless by prior agreement will be

deemed as misuse & will be pursued as necessary.

General Notice

This drawing to be read in conjunction with all other relevantinformation whether

produced by Christians Environmental Ltd or by others. Any inconsistencies to be

notified to the company immediately

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE

KEY:

Surveyed tree

- category A

Surveyed tree

- category B

Surveyed tree

- category C

Surveyed tree

- category U

Surveyed tree

- extents of root protection area (RPA)

Surveyed group of trees

-Category A

drawing number

scale drawn date

drawing title

project

client

rev

1:250 @ A1 CEL-TW Jul 2014

ABPH-TCP-004

RSK

Bishopgarth Police Training Headquarters

Tree Constraints Plan

rev date description by

Christians Environmental Ltd

12 Centenary Park

Coronet Way

Eccles

Salford

Manchester

M50 1RE

t: +44 (0) 161 8500211

e: [email protected]

w: www.christiansltd.com

A Jul 2014 Tree Constraints Plan CEL-TW

1050

Meters

1:250

5

Existing building

and/or topographical feature

Surveyed group of trees

-Category B

Surveyed group of trees

-Category C

Retaining Wall affecting trees

Ref. 1Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 2 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 3Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 4 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 19

Ref. 20Sorbus aria

Ref. 21Prunus avium

Ref. 22Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 23Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 24Prunus avium

Ref. 25Prunus avium

Ref. 26Sorbus aria

Ref. 27Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 28Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 29Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 30Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 31Prunus avium

Ref. 32Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 33Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 34Quercus pratrae

Ref. 35Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 36Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 37Betula pendula

Ref. 38Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 39Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 40Prunus avium

Ref. 41Prunus avium

Ref. 42Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 43Betula pendula

Ref. 44Betula pendula

Ref. 45Prunus avium

Ref. 46Betula pendula

Ref. 47Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 48Prunus avium

Ref. 49Prunus avium

Ref. 50Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 51Tilia cordata

Ref. 52Alnus glutinosa

Ref. 53Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 54Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 55Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 56Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 57Pyrus spp.

Ref. 58Prunus avium

Ref. 59Sorbus aria

Ref. 60Acer pseudoplatanus drumondii

Ref. 61Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 62Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 63Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 64Prunus weeping

Ref. 65Prunus weeping

Ref. 66Sorbus aria

Ref. 67Prunus avium

Ref. 68Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 69Acer platanoides leopoldii

Ref. 70Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 71lorell spp

Ref. 72Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 73Lorell spp

Ref. 74Pyrus spp

Ref. 118Betula pendula jackamontii

Ref. 119Prunus spp

Ref. 120Abies grandis

Ref. 121Laburnam vulgare

Ref. 122Malus spp

Aesculus hippocastanum

Aesculus hippocastanum

Sorbus aria

Ulmus glabra

Ref. 194Acer pseudo platanus

Ref. 195Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 196Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 197Sorbus aria

Ref. 198Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 199Tilia cordata

Ref. 200Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 201Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 202Juniper

Ref. 203Sorbus aria

Ref. G1

Ref. G6

Ref. G4

Ref. G7

Ref. H1

Ref. H2

Copyright & Usage Notice

This drawing remains the the property & copyright of Christians Environmental Ltd

until payment in full is received.

Any use of this drawing before payment is received unless by prior agreement will be

deemed as misuse & will be pursued as necessary.

General Notice

This drawing to be read in conjunction with all other relevantinformation whether

produced by Christians Environmental Ltd or by others. Any inconsistencies to be

notified to the company immediately

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE

KEY:

Retained Tree

Tree to be Removed Due to the

Proposal

Tree to be Removed Due to Overall

Poor Condition

1050

Meters

1:250

5

drawing number

scale drawn date

drawing title

project

client

rev

1:250 @ A1 CEL-TW Nov 2014

ABPH-TRP-001

RSK

Bishopgarth Police Training Headquarters

Tree Retention Plan

rev date description by

Christians Environmental Ltd

12 Centenary Park

Coronet Way

Eccles

Salford

Manchester

M50 1RE

t: +44 (0) 161 8500211

e: [email protected]

w: www.christiansltd.com

A Nov 2014 Tree Retention Plan CEL-TW

Retained Group

Group to be Remvoed Due to the

Proposal

Group to be Removed Due to Poor

Overall Condition

Building and/or Topographical Feature

Retained tree

- extents of root protection area (RPA)

Ref. 57Pyrus spp.

Ref. 58Prunus avium

Ref. 59Sorbus aria

Ref. 60Acer pseudoplatanus drumondii

Ref. 61Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 62Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 63Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 64Prunus weeping

Ref. 65Prunus weeping

Ref. 66Sorbus aria

Ref. 67Prunus avium

Ref. 70Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 71lorell spp

Ref. 72Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 73Lorell spp

Ref. 74Pyrus spp

Ref. 75Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 76Fraxinus excelsiorRef. 77Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 78Fraxinud excelsior

Ref. 79Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 80Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 81Prunus domestica

Ref. 82Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 83Tilia cordata

Ref. 84Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 85Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 86Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 87Ilex aquifolium varigata

Ref. 88Prunus laurocerasus

Ref. 89Ilex aquifolim

Ref. 90Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 91Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 92Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 93Ulmus glabra

Ref. 94Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 95Sorbus aria

Ref. 96Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 97Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 98Ulmus glabra

Ref. 99Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 100Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 101Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 102Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 103Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 104Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 105Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 106Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 107Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 108Taxus baccata

Ref. 109Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 110Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 111Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 112Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 113Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 114Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 115Ulmus glabra

Ref. 118Betula pendula jackamontii

Ref. 119Prunus spp

Ref. 120Abies grandis

Ref. 121Laburnam vulgare

Ref. 122Malus spp

Ref. 123Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 124Prunus avium

Ref. 125Taxus baccata

Ref. 126Malus spp

Ref. 127Prunus avium

Ref. 128Ilex aquifolium varigata

Ref. 129Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 130Thujopsis dolobrata

Ref. 131Prunus domestica

Ref. 132Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 133Prunus avium

Ref. 134Juniper

Ref. 135Betula pendula

Ref. 136Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 137Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 138Sorbus aria

Ref. 139Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 158Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 159Sorbus aria

Ref. 160Fagus sylvatic purpurea

Ref. 161Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 163Quercus ceris

Ref. 164Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 165Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 166Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 167Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 168Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 169Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 170Tilia cordata

Ref. 171Prunus laurocerasus

Ref. 172Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 173Tilia cordata

Ref. 174Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 175Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 176Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 177Tilia cordata

Ref. 178Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 179Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 180Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 181Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 182Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 183Acer pseudoplatansu

Ref. 184Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 185Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 186Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 187Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 188Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 189Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 190Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 191Ulmus glabra

Ref. 192Sorbus aria

Ref. 193Ulmus glabra

Ref. 194Acer pseudo platanus

Ref. 195Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 196Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 197Sorbus aria

Ref. 198Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 199Tilia cordata

Ref. 200Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 201Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 202Juniper

Ref. 203Sorbus aria

Ref. G6

Ref. G4

Ref. G3

Copyright & Usage Notice

This drawing remains the the property & copyright of Christians Environmental Ltd

until payment in full is received.

Any use of this drawing before payment is received unless by prior agreement will be

deemed as misuse & will be pursued as necessary.

General Notice

This drawing to be read in conjunction with all other relevantinformation whether

produced by Christians Environmental Ltd or by others. Any inconsistencies to be

notified to the company immediately

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE

KEY:

Retained Tree

Tree to be Removed Due to the

Proposal

Tree to be Removed Due to Overall

Poor Condition

1050

Meters

1:250

5

drawing number

scale drawn date

drawing title

project

client

rev

1:250 @ A1 CEL-TW Nov 2014

ABPH-TRP-002

RSK

Bishopgarth Police Training Headquarters

Tree Retention Plan

rev date description by

Christians Environmental Ltd

12 Centenary Park

Coronet Way

Eccles

Salford

Manchester

M50 1RE

t: +44 (0) 161 8500211

e: [email protected]

w: www.christiansltd.com

A Nov 2014 Tree Retention Plan CEL-TW

Retained Group

Group to be Remvoed Due to the

Proposal

Group to be Removed Due to Poor

Overall Condition

Building and/or Topographical Feature

Retained tree

- extents of root protection area (RPA)

Ref. 74Pyrus spp

Ref. 75Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 76Fraxinus excelsiorRef. 77Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 78Fraxinud excelsior

Ref. 79Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 80Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 81Prunus domestica

Ref. 82Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 83Tilia cordata

Ref. 84Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 85Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 86Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 87Ilex aquifolium varigata

Ref. 88Prunus laurocerasus

Ref. 89Ilex aquifolim

Ref. 90Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 91Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 92Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 93Ulmus glabra

Ref. 94Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 95Sorbus aria

Ref. 96Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 97Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 98Ulmus glabra

Ref. 99Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 100Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 101Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 102Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 103Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 104Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 105Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 106Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 107Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 108Taxus baccata

Ref. 109Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 110Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 111Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 112Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 113Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 114Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 115Ulmus glabra

Ref. 116Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 117Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 123Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 124Prunus avium

Ref. 125Taxus baccata

Ref. 126Malus spp

Ref. 127Prunus avium

Ref. 128Ilex aquifolium varigata

Ref. 129Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 130Thujopsis dolobrata

Ref. 131Prunus domestica

Ref. 132Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 133Prunus avium

Ref. 134Juniper

Ref. 135Betula pendula

Ref. 136Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 137Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 138Sorbus aria

Ref. 139Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 140Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 141Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 142Tilia cordata

Ref. 143Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 144Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 145Ulmus glabra

Ref. 146Ulmus glabra

Ref. 147Sorbus aria

Ref. 148Ulmus glabra

Ref. 149Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 150Ulmus glabra

Ref. 151Sorbus aria

Ref. 152Laburnum vulgare

Ref. 153Acer platanoides

Ref. 154Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 155Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 156Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 157Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 158Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 159Sorbus aria

Ref. 160Fagus sylvatic purpurea

Ref. 161Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 162Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 163Quercus ceris

Ref. 164Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 165Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 166Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 167Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 168Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 169Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 170Tilia cordata

Ref. 171Prunus laurocerasus

Ref. 172Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 173Tilia cordata

Ref. 174Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 175Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 176Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 177Tilia cordata

Ref. 178Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 179Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 180Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 181Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 182Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 183Acer pseudoplatansu

Ref. G3

Copyright & Usage Notice

This drawing remains the the property & copyright of Christians Environmental Ltd

until payment in full is received.

Any use of this drawing before payment is received unless by prior agreement will be

deemed as misuse & will be pursued as necessary.

General Notice

This drawing to be read in conjunction with all other relevantinformation whether

produced by Christians Environmental Ltd or by others. Any inconsistencies to be

notified to the company immediately

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE

KEY:

Retained Tree

Tree to be Removed Due to the

Proposal

Tree to be Removed Due to Overall

Poor Condition

Retained Group

Group to be Remvoed Due to the

Proposal

Group to be Removed Due to Poor

Overall Condition

Building and/or Topographical Feature

Retained tree

- extents of root protection area (RPA)

1050

Meters

1:250

5

drawing number

scale drawn date

drawing title

project

client

rev

1:250 @ A1 CEL-TW Nov 2014

ABPH-TRP-003

RSK

Bishopgarth Police Training Headquarters

Tree Retention Plan

rev date description by

Christians Environmental Ltd

12 Centenary Park

Coronet Way

Eccles

Salford

Manchester

M50 1RE

t: +44 (0) 161 8500211

e: [email protected]

w: www.christiansltd.com

A Nov 2014 Tree Retention Plan CEL-TW

Ref. 1Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 2 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 3Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 4 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 5 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 6 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 7 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 8 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 9Taxus baccata

Ref. 10Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 11Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 12Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 13Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 14Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 15Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 16Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 17Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 18Acer platanoides

Ref. 19Acer platanoides crimson king

Ref. 20Sorbus aria

Ref. 21Prunus avium

Ref. 22Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 23Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 24Prunus avium

Ref. 25Prunus avium

Ref. 26Sorbus aria

Ref. 27Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 28Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 29Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 47Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 49Prunus avium

Ref. 50Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 51Tilia cordata

Ref. 52Alnus glutinosa

Ref. 53Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 54Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 55Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 56Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 57Pyrus spp.

Ref. 58Prunus avium

Ref. 59Sorbus aria

Ref. 60Acer pseudoplatanus drumondii

Ref. 61Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 62Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 63Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 64Prunus weeping

Ref. 65Prunus weeping

Ref. 66Sorbus aria

Ref. 67Prunus avium

Ref. 68Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 69Acer platanoides leopoldii

Ref. 70Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 71lorell spp

Ref. 72Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 73Lorell spp

Ref. 74Pyrus spp

Ref. 75Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 76Fraxinus excelsiorRef. 77Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 78Fraxinud excelsior

Ref. 79Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 80Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 81Prunus domestica

Ref. 82Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 83Tilia cordata

Ref. 84Crataegus monogyna

Betula pendula jackamontii

Prunus spp

Ref. 121Laburnam vulgare

Ref. 122Malus spp

Ref. 200Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 201Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 202Juniper

Ref. 203Sorbus aria

Ref. G1

Ref. G6

Ref. H1

Ref. H2

Copyright & Usage Notice

This drawing remains the the property & copyright of Christians Environmental Ltd

until payment in full is received.

Any use of this drawing before payment is received unless by prior agreement will be

deemed as misuse & will be pursued as necessary.

General Notice

This drawing to be read in conjunction with all other relevantinformation whether

produced by Christians Environmental Ltd or by others. Any inconsistencies to be

notified to the company immediately

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE

KEY:

Retained Tree

Tree to be Removed Due to the

Proposal

Tree to be Removed Due to Overall

Poor Condition

1050

Meters

1:250

5

drawing number

scale drawn date

drawing title

project

client

rev

1:250 @ A1 CEL-TW Nov 2014

ABPH-TRP-004

RSK

Bishopgarth Police Training Headquarters

Tree Retention Plan

rev date description by

Christians Environmental Ltd

12 Centenary Park

Coronet Way

Eccles

Salford

Manchester

M50 1RE

t: +44 (0) 161 8500211

e: [email protected]

w: www.christiansltd.com

A Nov 2014 Tree Retention Plan CEL-TW

Retained Group

Group to be Remvoed Due to the

Proposal

Group to be Removed Due to Poor

Overall Condition

Building and/or Topographical Feature

Retained tree

- extents of root protection area (RPA)

Ref. 1Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 2Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 3Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 28Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 29Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 30Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 31Prunus avium

Ref. 32Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 33Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 34Quercus pratrae

Ref. 35Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 36Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 37Betula pendula

Ref. 38Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 39Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 40Prunus avium

Ref. 41Prunus avium

Ref. 42Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 43Betula pendula

Ref. 44Betula pendula

Ref. 45Prunus avium

Ref. 46Betula pendula

Ref. 47Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 48Prunus avium

Ref. 49Prunus avium

Ref. 50Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 51Tilia cordata

Ref. 52Alnus glutinosa

Ref. 53Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 54Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 55Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 56Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 58Prunus avium

Ref. 59Sorbus aria

Ref. 60Acer pseudoplatanus drumondii

Ref. 62Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 64Prunus weeping

Ref. 65Prunus weeping

Ref. 68Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 69Acer platanoides leopoldii

Ref. 183Acer pseudoplatansu

Ref. 184Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 185Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 186Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 187Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 188Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 189Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 190Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 191Ulmus glabra

Ref. 192Sorbus aria

Ref. 193Ulmus glabra

Ref. 194Acer pseudo platanus

Ref. 195Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 196Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 197Sorbus aria

Ref. 198Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 199Tilia cordata

Ref. 200Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 201Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. G1

Ref. G4

Ref. H1

Ref. 63

Copyright & Usage Notice

This drawing remains the the property & copyright of Christians Environmental Ltd

until payment in full is received.

Any use of this drawing before payment is received unless by prior agreement will be

deemed as misuse & will be pursued as necessary.

General Notice

This drawing to be read in conjunction with all other relevantinformation whether

produced by Christians Environmental Ltd or by others. Any inconsistencies to be

notified to the company immediately

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE

KEY:

Proposed Tree Protection Fencing

1050

Meters

1:250

5

drawing number

scale drawn date

drawing title

project

client

rev

1:250 @ A1 CEL-TW Nov 2014

ABPH-TPP-001

RSK

Bishopgarth Police Training Headquarters

Tree Protection Plan

rev date description by

Christians Environmental Ltd

12 Centenary Park

Coronet Way

Eccles

Salford

Manchester

M50 1RE

t: +44 (0) 161 8500211

e: [email protected]

w: www.christiansltd.com

A Nov 2014 Tree Protection Plan CEL-TW

Retained Tree Canopy

Retained Tree Root Protection Area

Ref. 58Prunus avium

Ref. 59Sorbus aria

Ref. 60Acer pseudoplatanus drumondii

Ref. 62Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 64Prunus weeping

Ref. 65Prunus weeping

Ref. 75Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 76Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 82Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 84Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 85Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 86Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 87Ilex aquifolium varigata

Prunus laurocerasus

Ref. 91Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 92Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 93Ulmus glabra

Ref. 94Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 95Sorbus aria

Ref. 96Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 97Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 98Ulmus glabra

Ref. 100Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 101Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 102Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 103Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 104Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 105Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 106Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 107Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 108Taxus baccata

Ref. 109Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 110Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 111Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 112Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 113Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 114Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 128Ilex aquifolium varigata

Ref. 129Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 130Thujopsis dolobrata

Ref. 133Prunus avium

Ref. 134Juniper

Ref. 135Betula pendula

Ref. 159Sorbus aria

Ref. 160Fagus sylvatic purpurea

Ref. 163Quercus ceris

Ref. 164Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 165Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 166Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 167Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 168Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 169Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 170Tilia cordata

Ref. 171Prunus laurocerasus

Ref. 172Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 173Tilia cordata

Ref. 174Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 175Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 176Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 177Tilia cordata

Ref. 178Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 179Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 180Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 181Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 182Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 183Acer pseudoplatansu

Ref. 184Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 185Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 186Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 187Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 188Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 189Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 190Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 191Ulmus glabra

Ref. 192Sorbus aria

Ref. 193Ulmus glabra

Ref. 194Acer pseudo platanus

Ref. 195Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 196Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 197Sorbus aria

Ref. 198Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 199Tilia cordata

Ref. 200Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 201Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. G4

Ref. 63

Copyright & Usage Notice

This drawing remains the the property & copyright of Christians Environmental Ltd

until payment in full is received.

Any use of this drawing before payment is received unless by prior agreement will be

deemed as misuse & will be pursued as necessary.

General Notice

This drawing to be read in conjunction with all other relevantinformation whether

produced by Christians Environmental Ltd or by others. Any inconsistencies to be

notified to the company immediately

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE

KEY:

Proposed Tree Protection Fencing

1050

Meters

1:250

5

drawing number

scale drawn date

drawing title

project

client

rev

1:250 @ A1 CEL-TW Nov 2014

ABPH-TPP-002

RSK

Bishopgarth Police Training Headquarters

Tree Protection Plan

rev date description by

Christians Environmental Ltd

12 Centenary Park

Coronet Way

Eccles

Salford

Manchester

M50 1RE

t: +44 (0) 161 8500211

e: [email protected]

w: www.christiansltd.com

A Nov 2014 Tree Protection Plan CEL-TW

Retained Tree Canopy

Retained Tree Root Protection Area

Ref. 75Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 76Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 82Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 84Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 85Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 86Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 87Ilex aquifolium varigata

Prunus laurocerasus

Ref. 91Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 92Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 93Ulmus glabra

Ref. 94Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 95Sorbus aria

Ref. 96Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 97Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 98Ulmus glabra

Ref. 100Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 101Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 102Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 103Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 104Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 105Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 106Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 107Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 108Taxus baccata

Ref. 109Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 110Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 111Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 112Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 113Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 114Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 115Ulmus glabra

Ref. 116Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 117Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 128Ilex aquifolium varigata

Ref. 129Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 130Thujopsis dolobrata

Ref. 133Prunus avium

Ref. 134Juniper

Ref. 135Betula pendula

Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 141Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 143Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 144Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 145Ulmus glabra

Ref. 146Ulmus glabra

Ref. 147Sorbus aria

Ref. 148Ulmus glabra

Ref. 149Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 151Sorbus aria

Ref. 153Acer platanoides

Ref. 154Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 155Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 157Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 158Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 159Sorbus aria

Ref. 160Fagus sylvatic purpurea

Ref. 161Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 163Quercus ceris

Ref. 164Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 165Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 166Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 167Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 168Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 169Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 170Tilia cordata

Ref. 171Prunus laurocerasus

Ref. 172Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 173Tilia cordata

Ref. 174Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 175Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 176Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 177Tilia cordata

Ref. 178Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 179Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 180Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 181Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 182Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 183Acer pseudoplatansu

Copyright & Usage Notice

This drawing remains the the property & copyright of Christians Environmental Ltd

until payment in full is received.

Any use of this drawing before payment is received unless by prior agreement will be

deemed as misuse & will be pursued as necessary.

General Notice

This drawing to be read in conjunction with all other relevantinformation whether

produced by Christians Environmental Ltd or by others. Any inconsistencies to be

notified to the company immediately

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE

KEY:

Proposed Tree Protection Fencing

1050

Meters

1:250

5

drawing number

scale drawn date

drawing title

project

client

rev

1:250 @ A1 CEL-TW Nov 2014

ABPH-TPP-003

RSK

Bishopgarth Police Training Headquarters

Tree Protection Plan

rev date description by

Christians Environmental Ltd

12 Centenary Park

Coronet Way

Eccles

Salford

Manchester

M50 1RE

t: +44 (0) 161 8500211

e: [email protected]

w: www.christiansltd.com

A Nov 2014 Tree Protection Plan CEL-TW

Retained Tree Canopy

Retained Tree Root Protection Area

Ref. 1Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 2 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 3Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 4 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 5 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 6 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 7 Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 13Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 14Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 15Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 16Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 17Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 18Acer platanoides

Ref. 19Acer platanoides crimson king

Ref. 20Sorbus aria

Ref. 21Prunus avium

Ref. 22Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 23Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 24Prunus avium

Ref. 25Prunus avium

Ref. 26Sorbus aria

Ref. 27Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 28Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 29Sorbus aucuparia

Ref. 30Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 31Prunus avium

Ref. 45Prunus avium

Ref. 46Betula pendula

Ref. 47Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 48Prunus avium

Ref. 49Prunus avium

Ref. 50Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 51Tilia cordata

Ref. 52Alnus glutinosa

Ref. 53Crataegus monogyna

Ref. 54Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 55Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 56Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 58Prunus avium

Ref. 59Sorbus aria

Ref. 60Acer pseudoplatanus drumondii

Ref. 62Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 64Prunus weeping

Ref. 65Prunus weeping

Ref. 68Aesculus hippocastanum

Ref. 69Acer platanoides leopoldii

Ref. 75Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 76Fraxinus excelsior

Ref. 82Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 84Crataegus monogyna

Ilex aquifolium

Ref. 199Tilia cordata

Ref. 200Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. 201Acer pseudoplatanus

Ref. G1

Ref. H1

Ref. 63

Copyright & Usage Notice

This drawing remains the the property & copyright of Christians Environmental Ltd

until payment in full is received.

Any use of this drawing before payment is received unless by prior agreement will be

deemed as misuse & will be pursued as necessary.

General Notice

This drawing to be read in conjunction with all other relevantinformation whether

produced by Christians Environmental Ltd or by others. Any inconsistencies to be

notified to the company immediately

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE

KEY:

Proposed Tree Protection Fencing

1050

Meters

1:250

5

drawing number

scale drawn date

drawing title

project

client

rev

1:250 @ A1 CEL-TW Nov 2014

ABPH-TPP-004

RSK

Bishopgarth Police Training Headquarters

Tree Protection Plan

rev date description by

Christians Environmental Ltd

12 Centenary Park

Coronet Way

Eccles

Salford

Manchester

M50 1RE

t: +44 (0) 161 8500211

e: [email protected]

w: www.christiansltd.com

A Nov 2014 Tree Protection Plan CEL-TW

Retained Tree Canopy

Retained Tree Root Protection Area

Glossary of Arboricultural Terms 

   (Head Office)        The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE

                                T: 0161 4061862     E: [email protected]    Company Reg No. 7514654     VAT No.109428515 

Abscission.  The  shedding  of  a  leaf or  other  short‐lived  part  of  a woody plant, involving the formation of a corky layer across its base; in some tree species twigs can be shed in this way 

Abiotic. Pertaining to non‐living agents; e.g. environmental factors 

Absorptive  roots.  Non‐woody,  short‐lived  roots,  generally  having  a diameter  of  less  than  one millimetre,  the  primary  function  of which  is uptake of water and nutrients 

Adaptive growth.  In  tree biomechanics,  the process whereby  the  rate of wood formation in the cambial zone, as well as wood quality, responds to gravity and other  forces acting on  the cambium This helps  to maintain a uniform distribution of mechanical stress 

Adaptive roots. The adaptive growth of existing  roots; or  the production of new roots in response to damage, decay or altered mechanical loading 

Adventitious shoots. Shoots that develop other than  from apical, axillary or dormant buds; see also 'epicormic' 

Anchorage. The  system whereby a  tree  is  fixed within  the  soil,  involving cohesion  between  roots  and  soil  and  the  development  of  a  branched system  of  roots  which  withstands  wind  and  gravitational  forces transmitted from the aerial parts of the tree 

Architecture.  In a tree, a term describing the pattern of branching of the crown or root system 

Axil. The place where a bud is borne between a leaf and its parent shoot 

Bacteria.  Microscopic  single‐celled  organisms,  many  species  of  which break  down  dead  organic matter,  and  some  of which  cause  diseases  in other organisms 

Bark.  A  term  usually  applied  to  all  the  tissues  of  a  woody  plant  lying outside  the  vascular  cambium,  thus  including  the  phloem,  cortex  and periderm; occasionally applied only to the periderm or the phellem 

Basidiomycotina (Basidiomycetes). One of the major taxonomic groups of fungi; their spores are borne on microscopic peg‐like structures (basidia), which  in many  types  are  in  turn  borne  on  or  within  conspicuous  fruit bodies, such as brackets or toadstools. Most of the principal decay fungi in standing trees are basidiomycetes 

Bolling. A term sometimes used to describe pollard heads 

Bottle‐butt. A broadening of  the  stem base  and buttresses of  a  tree,  in excess  of  normal  and  sometimes  denoting  a  growth  response  to weakening  in  that  region,  especially  due  to  decay  involving  selective delignification 

Bracing. The use of rods or cables to restrain the movement between 

parts of a tree 

Branch:  

Primary. A first order branch arising from a stem 

Lateral.  A  second  order  branch,  subordinate  to  a  primary branch or stem and bearing sub‐lateral branches 

Sub‐lateral. A  third order branch,  subordinate  to a  lateral or primary branch, or stem and usually bearing only twigs 

Branch  bark  ridge.  The  raised  arc  of  bark  tissues  that  forms within  the acute angle between a branch and its parent stem 

Branch  collar. A  visible  swelling  formed  at  the  base  of  a  branch whose diameter  growth  has  been  disproportionately  slow  compared  to  that of the parent stem; a term sometimes applied also to the pattern of growth of the cells of the parent stem around the branch base 

Brown‐rot. A  type  of wood  decay  in which  cellulose  is  degraded, while lignin is only modified  

Buckling. An irreversible deformation of a structure subjected to a bending load 

Buttress  zone. The  region at  the base of a  tree where  the major  lateral roots join the stem, with buttress‐like formations on the upper side of the junctions 

Cambium. Layer of dividing cells producing xylem (woody) tissue internally and phloem (bark) tissue externally 

 

Canker. A persistent lesion formed by the death of bark and cambium due to colonisation by fungi or bacteria 

Canopy  species.  Tree  species  that  mature  to  form  a  closed  woodland canopy 

Cleaning  out.  The  removal  of  dead,  crossing,  weak,  and  damaged branches, where  this will not damage or  spoil  the overall appearance of the tree 

Compartmentalization.  The  confinement  of  disease,  decay  or  other dysfunction within an anatomically discrete region of plant tissue, due to passive and/or active defences operating at the boundaries of the affected region 

Compression  strength.  The  ability  of  a  material  or  structure  to  resist failure when subjected  to compressive  loading; measurable  in  trees with special drilling devices 

Compressive loading. Mechanical loading which exerts a positive pressure; the opposite to tensile loading 

Condition. An indication of the physiological vitality of the tree. Where the term ‘condition’ is used in a report, it should not be taken as an indication of the stability of the tree 

Construction exclusion zone.  Area based on the Root Protection Area (in square metres) to be protected during development, by the use of barriers and/or ground protection  

Crown/Canopy. The main foliage bearing section of the tree 

Crown  lifting.  The  removal  of  limbs  and  small  branches  to  a  specified height above ground level 

Crown thinning. The removal of a proportion of secondary branch growth throughout the crown to produce an even density of foliage around a well‐balanced branch structure 

Crown  reduction/shaping.  A  specified  reduction  in  crown  size  whilst preserving, as far as possible, the natural tree shape 

Crown reduction/thinning. Reduction of the canopy volume by thinning to remove dominant branches whilst preserving, as far as possible the natural tree shape 

Deadwood. Dead branch wood 

Decurrent. In trees, a system of branching in which there is a well‐defined central main  stem,  bearing  branches  which  are  limited  in  their  length, diameter and secondary branching (cf. excurrent) In fungi with toadstools as fruit bodies, the description of gills which run some distance down the stem, rather than terminating abruptly 

Defect.  In  relation  to  tree hazards,  any  feature of a  tree which detracts from  the  uniform  distribution of mechanical  stress,  or which makes  the tree mechanically unsuited to its environment 

Delamination. The separation of wood layers along their length, visible as longitudinal splitting 

Dieback.  The  death  of  parts  of  a woody  plant,  starting  at  shoot‐tips  or root‐tips 

Disease. A malfunction in or destruction of tissues within a living organism, usually  excluding  mechanical  damage;  in  trees,  usually  caused  by pathogenic micro‐organisms 

Distal.  In  the  direction  away  from  the main  body  of  a  tree  or  subject organism (cf. proximal) 

Dominance.  In  trees,  the  tendency  for a  leading  shoot  to grow  faster or more  vigorously  than  the  lateral  shoots;  also  the  tendency  of  a  tree  to maintain a taller crown than its neighbours 

Dormant bud. An axial bud which does not develop into a shoot until after the  formation of  two or more annual wood  increments; many such buds persist through the life of a tree and develop only if stimulated to do so 

Dysfunction. In woody tissues, the loss of physiological function, especially water conduction, in sapwood 

DBH (Diameter at Breast Height). Stem diameter measured at a height of 1.5 metres (UK) or the nearest measurable point. Where measurement at a height of 1.5 metres is not possible, another height may be specified 

Deadwood.  Branch  or  stem wood  bearing  no  live  tissues.  Retention  of deadwood  provides  valuable  habitat  for  a  wide  range  of  species  and seldom  represents  a  threat  to  the  health  of  the  tree.  Removal  of deadwood  can  result  in  the  ingress of decay  to otherwise  sound  tissues and climbing operations to access deadwood can cause significant damage to a tree. Removal of deadwood  is generally recommended only where  it represents an unacceptable level of hazard 

Endophytes.  Micro‐organisms  which  live  inside  plant  tissues  without causing overt disease, but in some cases capable of causing disease if the 

Glossary of Arboricultural Terms 

   (Head Office)        The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE

                                T: 0161 4061862     E: [email protected]    Company Reg No. 7514654     VAT No.109428515 

tissues become physiologically stressed, for example by lack of moisture 

Epicormic  shoot.  A  shoot  having  developed  from  a  dormant  or adventitious bud and not having developed from a first year shoot 

Excrescence.  Any  abnormal  outgrowth  on  the  surface  of  tree  or  other organism 

Excurrent. In trees, a system of branching in which the crown is borne on a number  of major  widely‐spreading  and  secondarily  branched  limbs  (cf. excurrent) 

Felling  licence.  In  the UK, a permit  to  fell  trees  in excess of a  stipulated number of stems or volume of timber 

Flush‐cut. A pruning cut which removes part of the branch bark ridge and or branch‐collar 

Girdling  root.    A  root  which  circles  and  constricts  the  stem  or  roots possibly causing death of phloem and/or cambial tissue 

Guying a form of artificial support with cables for trees with a temporarily inadequate anchorage  

Habit.  The  overall  growth  characteristics,  shape  of  the  tree  and  branch structure  

Hazard beam. An upwardly curved part of a tree  in which strong  internal stresses may occur without being  reduced by adaptive growth; prone  to longitudinal splitting  

Heartwood/false‐heartwood/ripewood.  Sapwood  that  has  become dysfunctional as part of the natural aging processes  

Heave. A  term mainly applicable  to a  shrinkable  clay  soil which expands due to re‐wetting after the felling of a tree which was previously extracting moisture  from the deeper  layers; also the  lifting of pavements and other structures  by  root  diameter  expansion;  also  the  lifting  of  one  side  of  a wind‐rocked root‐plate 

High canopy  tree  species. Tree  species having potential  to contribute  to the closed canopy of a mature woodland or forest 

Incipient  failure.  In wood tissues, a mechanical  failure which results only in  deformation  or  cracking,  and  not  in  the  fall  or  detachment  of  the affected part 

Included  bark  (ingrown  bark).  Bark  of  adjacent  parts  of  a  tree  (usually forks,  acutely  joined  branches  or  basal  flutes)  which  is  in  face‐to‐face contact 

Increment borer. A hollow auger, which can be used for the extraction of wood cores for counting or measuring wood  increments or for  inspecting the condition of the wood 

Infection. The establishment of a parasitic micro‐organism in the tissues of a tree or other organism 

Internode.  The  part  of  a  stem  between  two  nodes;  not  to  be  confused with a length of stem which bear nodes but no branches 

Lever  arm.  A  mechanical  term  denoting  the  length  of  the  lever represented by a structure that is free to move at one end, such as a tree or an individual branch 

Lignin.  The  hard,  cement‐like  constituent  of  wood  cells;  deposition  of lignin within  the matrix of cellulose microfibrils  in  the cell wall  is  termed Lignification 

Lions  tailing.  A  term  applied  to  a  branch  of  a  tree  that  has  few  if  any side‐branches  except  at  its  end,  and  is  thus  liable  to  snap  due  to  end‐loading 

Loading.  A mechanical  term  describing  the  force  acting  on  a  structure from  a  particular  source;  e.g.  the weight  of  the  structure  itself  or wind pressure 

Longitudinal. Along the length (of a stem, root or branch) 

Lopping.  A  term  often  used  to  describe  the  removal  of  large  branches from a tree, but also used to describe other forms of cutting 

Mature Heights (approximate):  

Low maturing – less than 8 metres high  

Moderately high maturing – 8 – 12 metres high 

High maturing – greater than 12 metres high  

Micro drill. An electronic  rotating  steel probe, which when  inserted  into 

woody tissue provides a measure of tissue density 

Minor  deadwood.  Deadwood  of  a  diameter  less  than  25mm  and  or unlikely  to  cause  significant harm or damage upon  impact with  a  target beneath the tree 

Mulch. Material laid down over the rooting area of a tree or other plant to help conserve moisture; a mulch may consist of organic matter or a sheet of plastic or other artificial material 

Mycelium.  The  body  of  a  fungus,  consisting  of  branched  filaments (hyphae) 

Occluding tissues. A general term for the roll of wood, cambium and bark that forms around a wound on a woody plant (cf. wound wood) 

Occlusion.  The  process whereby  a wound  is  progressively  closed  by  the formation of new wood and bark around it 

Pathogen. A micro‐organism which causes disease in another organism 

Photosynthesis.  The  process  whereby  plants  use  light  energy  to  split hydrogen  from water molecules,  and  combine  it with  carbon  dioxide  to form  the  molecular  building  blocks  for  synthesizing  carbohydrates  and other biochemical products. 

Phytotoxic. Toxic to plants 

Pollarding. The  removal of  the  tree canopy, back  to  the stem or primary branches. Pollarding may involve the removal of the entire canopy in one operation,  or  may  be  phased  over  several  years.  The  period  of  safe retention  of  trees  having  been  pollarded  varies  with  species  and individuals. It is usually necessary to re‐pollard on a regular basis, annually in the case of some species.  

Primary branch. A major branch, generally having a basal diameter greater than 0.25 x stem diameter 

Primary root zone.   The soil volume most likely to contain roots that are critical  to  the  health  and  stability  of  the  tree  and  normally  defined  by reference  to  Table  1  of  BS5837  (1991)  Guide  for  Trees  in  Relation  to Construction. 

Priority. Works may be prioritised, 1. = high, 5. = low 

Probability. A statistical measure of the  likelihood that a particular event might occur. 

Proximal. In the direction towards from the main body of a tree or other living organism (cf. distal) 

Pruning.  The  removal  or  cutting  back  of  twigs  or  branches,  sometimes applied to twigs or small branches only, but often used to describe most activities involving the cutting of trees or shrubs 

Radial. In the plane or direction of the radius of a circular object such as a tree stem 

Rams‐horn. In connection with wounds on trees, a roll of occluding tissues which has a spiral structure as seen in cross‐section 

Rays. Strips of radially elongated parenchyma cells within wood and bark. The  functions  of  rays  include  food  storage,  radial  translocation  and contributing to the strength of wood 

Red‐rot. A form of decay in which reddish pigments are present but which is  biochemically  a white‐rot;  not  to  be  confused with  brown‐rots which sometimes also have a reddish‐brown colour 

Reactive Growth/Reaction Wood. Production of woody tissue in response to  altered  mechanical  loading;  often  in  response  to  internal  defect  or decay and associated strength loss (cf. adaptive growth) 

Removal  of  dead  wood.  Unless  otherwise  specified,  this  refers  to  the removal  of  all  accessible  dead,  dying  and  diseased  branchwood  and broken snags 

Removal of major dead wood. The removal of, dead, dying and diseased branchwood above a specified size 

Respacing.  Selective  removal  of  trees  from  a  group  or  woodland  to provide space and resources for the development of retained trees. 

Residual wall. The wall of non‐decayed wood remaining following decay of internal stem, branch or root tissues 

Root‐collar. The transitional area between the stem/s and roots 

Root‐collar  examination.  Excavation  of  surfacing  and  soils  around  the root‐collar to assess the structural integrity of roots and/or stem 

Root protection area.  An area of ground surrounding a tree that contains sufficient  rooting  volume  to  ensure  the  tree’s  survival.    Calculated with reference to Table 2 of BS5837  (2005) and shown  in plan  form  in square metres  

Glossary of Arboricultural Terms 

   (Head Office)        The Lighthouse, 12 Centenary Park, Coronet Way, Eccles, Salford, Manchester, M50 1RE

                                T: 0161 4061862     E: [email protected]    Company Reg No. 7514654     VAT No.109428515 

Root  zone.  Area  of  soils  containing  absorptive  roots  of  the  tree/s described 

microscopic and dispersed  in air or water. The Primary  root  zone  is  that which we consider of primary  importance  to  the physiological well‐being of the tree 

Sapwood. Living xylem tissues 

Secondary  branch.  A  branch,  generally  having  a  basal  diameter  of  less than 0.25 x stem diameter 

Selective delignification. A kind of wood decay (white‐rot) in which lignin is degraded faster than cellulose 

Shedding. In woody plants, the normal abscission, rotting off or sloughing of leaves, floral parts, twigs, fine roots and bark scales 

Silvicultural  thinning.  Removal  of  selected  trees  to  favour  the development of retained specimens to achieve a management objective 

Simultaneous  white‐rot.  A  kind  of  wood  decay  in  which  lignin  and cellulose are degraded at about the same rate 

Snag.  In woody plants, a portion of a cut or broken stem, branch or root which extends beyond any growing‐point or dormant bud; a snag usually tends to die back to the nearest growing point 

Soft‐rot. A kind of wood decay in which a fungus degrades cellulose within the cell walls, without any general degradation of the wall as a whole 

Spores. Propagules of  fungi  and many other  life‐forms; most  spores  are Shrub species. Woody perennial species forming the lowest level of woody plants in a woodland and not normally considered to be trees 

Sporophore. The spore bearing structure of fungi 

Sprouts. Adventitious shoot growth erupting from beneath the bark 

Stem/s. The main supporting structure/s, from ground level up to the first major division into branches 

Stress.  In  plant  physiology,  a  condition  under  which  one  or  more physiological functions are not operating within their optimum range, for example  due  to  lack  of  water,  inadequate  nutrition  or  extremes  of temperature 

Stress. In mechanics, the application of a force to an object 

Stringy  white‐rot.  The  kind  of  wood  decay  produced  by  selective delignification 

Storm. A  layer of tissue which supports the fruit bodies of some types of fungi, mainly ascomycetes 

Structural  roots.  Roots,  generally  having  a  diameter  greater  than  ten millimetres,  and  contributing  significantly  to  the  structural  support  and stability of the tree 

Subsidence. In relation to soil or structures resting  in or on soil, a sinking due to shrinkage when certain types of clay soil dry out, sometimes due to extraction of moisture by tree roots 

Subsidence.  In  relation  to branches of  trees, a  term  that can be used  to describe a progressive downward bending due to increasing weight 

Taper. In stems and branches, the degree of change in girth along a given length 

Target canker. A kind of perennial canker,  containing concentric  rings of dead occluding tissues 

Targets.  In  tree  risk  assessment  (with  slight misuse  of  normal meaning) persons or property or other  things of value which might be harmed by mechanical failure of the tree or by objects falling from it 

Topping. In arboriculture, the removal of the crown of a tree, or of a major proportion of it 

Torsional stress. Mechanical stress applied by a twisting force 

Translocation.  In plant physiology, the movement of water and dissolved materials through the body of the plant 

Transpiration.  The  evaporation of moisture  from  the  surface of  a plant, especially via the stomata of leaves; it exerts a suction which draws water up from the roots and through the intervening xylem cells 

Understory. A  layer of vegetation beneath the main canopy of woodland or forest or plants forming this 

Understory tree species. Tree species not having potential to attain a size at which they can contribute to the closed high canopy of a woodland 

Vascular  wilt.  A  type  of  plant  disease  in  which  water‐conducting  cells 

become dysfunctional 

Vessels.  Water‐conducting  cells  in  plants,  usually  wide  and  long  for hydraulic efficiency; generally not present in coniferous trees 

Veteran tree. A loosely defined term for an old specimen that is of interest biologically, culturally or aesthetically because of its age, size or condition and which has usually lived longer than the typical upper age range for the species concerned 

White‐rot. A range of kinds of wood decay in which lignin, usually together with cellulose and other wood constituents, is degraded 

Wind exposure. The degree to which a tree or other object is exposed to wind, both in terms of duration and velocity 

Wind pressure. The force exerted by a wind on a particular object 

Wind throw. The blowing over of a tree at its roots 

Wound dressing. A general term for sealants and other materials used to cover  wounds  in  the  hope  of  protecting  them  against  desiccation  and infection; only of proven value against fresh wound parasites 

Woundwood.  Wood  with  atypical  anatomical  features,  formed  in  the vicinity of a wound' 

 

 

 

 

 

TREE PROTECTION AREA

KEEP OUT! (TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990)

TREES ENCLOSED BY THIS FENCE ARE PROTECTED BY

PLANNING CONDITIONS AND/OR ARE THE SUBJECTS OF A

TREE PRESERVATION ORDER.

CONTRAVENTION OF A TREE PRESERVATION ORDER MAY

LEAD TO CRIMINAL PROSECUTION

ANY INCURSION INTO THE PROTECTED AREA MUST BE

WITH THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE LOCAL

PLANNING AUTHORITY

Tree Protection Warning Sign


Recommended