Budget Study Session Presentation 20100306...Mar 06, 2010 · 2010-11 1st Interim vs 201011 1st...

District Budget Study SessionPresentation OutlinePresentation Outline

Big PictureSummaryRecommended Workforce Reduction to Balance BudgetRationaleRationaleProcess to Determine Return of WorkforceCommunity Engagement Calendar

1

East Side Union High School DistrictEast Side Union High School DistrictEstimate of Second Interim Financial Report 2009-2010

Based on Governor’s 2010-2011 Proposed Budget

A f M h 6 2010As of March 6, 2010

Jerry J. Kurr, Associate Superintendent

2

Governor’s Budget 2010-11

For the current year, 2009-10, the Governor’s January Budget proposes no change in revenue limit funding with the deficit factor remaining at 18 355%change in revenue limit funding, with the deficit factor remaining at 18.355%In 2010-11, the statutory cost of living adjustment (COLA) is negative 0.38% and is fully “funded”The deficit factor of 18.355% remains unchanged in the 2010-11 budgetIn addition to the negative COLA and the continuation of the 18.355% deficit factor the Governor’s Budget proposes an ongoing targeted cut of $1 5 factor, the Governor s Budget proposes an ongoing targeted cut of $1.5 billion in 2010-11

$1.2 billion is aimed at “school district administrative costs”$300 million assumed to follow from the “elimination of administrative costs”

Th G ’ b d t id ifi h thi ill b The Governor’s budget provides no specifics on how this will be implemented

3

2010-11 January Proposals

2010-11 January Budget2010 11 January Budget

Proposition 98 $50.0 Billion

R Li it COLA 0 38% f d dRevenue Limit COLA -0.38%, funded

Enrollment 0.11%*

Deficit Factor 18.355%

Mandates Only CASHEE and Mandates Only CASHEE and Intra/Inter District

TransfersC CO % fCategorical COLA -0.38%, funded

*Projected statewide increase in enrollment

4

Funded Revenue Limit 2009-10 vs. 2010-11

East Side Union High School District

$7,365 $7 337$7,365 $7,337

Loss due to Deficit Factor and $253 per

Loss due to Deficit Factor and $231-per- $1,578$1 605

$5 760

Factor and $253-per-ADA one-time cut

ADA cut to administration

$1,605

$5,760 $5,759Funded Revenue Limit Funded Revenue Limit

2009-10 2010-11

5

Funded Revenue Limit 2010-11 1st Interim vs 2010-11 2nd Interim est2010 11 1st Interim vs. 2010 11 2 Interim, est.


$7 337 $7 337$7,337 $7,337Loss due to Deficit Factor and Restore

$253-per-ADA Loss due to Deficit

Factor and $231-per- $1,578$1,329

$6,008$5,759

ADA cut to administration

Funded Revenue LimitFunded Revenue Limit

Funded Revenue Limit

2010-11 1st 2010-11 2nd

6

2009-10 K-12 Revenue Limits


for 2009-10

Base Revenue Limit per ADA

(A)

Proration Factor(B)

Funded Base Revenue Limit (C) = (A) x (B)

$ $1. 2008-09 Base Revenue Limit $7,065.34 0.92156 $6,511.132. 2009-10 COLA per ADA 300.00 – –3. 2009-10 Base Revenue Limit 7,365.34 0.81645* 6,013.434. 2009-10 One-Time Reduction – – 5. Net 2009-10 Funding (C3 minus C4) $5,760.606 Dollar Change (Line 5 Column C minus Line 1 Column C) 6. Dollar Change (Line 5, Column C minus Line 1, Column C) 7. Percentage Change (Line 6, Column C divided by Line 1, Column C) *0.81645 = 1 - .18355 (deficit factor)

7

2010-11 K-12 Revenue Limits


Base Revenue Limit per ADA Proration Factor

Funded Base Revenue Limit District

for 2010-11Limit per ADA

(A) (B)Revenue Limit (C) = (A) x (B)

1. 2009-10 Base Revenue Limit $7,365.34 0.81645 $6,013.432 2010 11 COLA ADA 2. 2010-11 COLA per ADA – –3. 2010-11 Base Revenue Limit 7,337.34 0.81645* 5,990.57

4. 2010-11 Ongoing Administration C t R d ti – 4. Cost Reductions 231.00 231.00

5. Net 2010-11 Funding (C3 minus C4) $5,759.136. Net 2009-10 Funded Revenue Limit (Slide TK Line 5, Column C) 5,760.607. Dollar Change (Line 5, Column C Minus Line 6, Column C) 8. Percentage Change (Line 7, Column C Divided by Line 1, Column C) *0 81645 = 1 - 18355 (deficit factor) 0.81645 = 1 - .18355 (deficit factor)

8

ESUHSD 1st Interim Financial ReportUnrestricted Gen. Fund

as of December 10, 2009

Description 2009/2010Millions

2010/2011Millions

2011/2012MillionsMillions Millions Millions

Revenues - Transfers $ 138.1 $ 147.8 $ 146.8

Exp & Other Obligations $ 145 4 $ 154 4 $ 160 9Exp. & Other Obligations $ 145.4 $ 154.4 $ 160.9

Difference $ ( 7.3) $ (6.6) $ (14.1)

Begin Balance + Assets + Reserves $ 14.9 $ 6.7 $ .2

End Balance + Assets + Reserves $ 7 6 $ 0 0 $ (13 9)End Balance + Assets + ReservesPositive/(Qualified/Negative)

$ 7.6 $ 0.0 $ (13.9)

Reserve Requirement $ 6.4 $ 6.4 $ 6.5

(Doesn’t) Meet Reserves Requirement $ 7.6 $ .0 $ (13.9)

9

District Unrestricted Budget Overview Based on Governor’s 2010-11 Budget ProposalsBased on Governor s 2010 11 Budget Proposals

2009-10Adopted

2009-10 Adjusted 2010 11 Adopted

BudgetAdjusted Budget

2010-11 Budget Net Change

Beginning Fund Balance $ 9.9 $ 14.9 $ 7.6 ($ 7.3)RRevenues:

Revenue Limit $145.7 $130.3 $129.9 ($ .4)State $ 22.5 $ 25.3 $ 25.2 $ 0Other Local $ 1.5 $ 2.2 $ 3.3 $ 1.0Sp. Ed. & Other ($19.2) ($19.8) ($18.2) $ 1.6

T t l R $150 5 $138 0 $140 2 $ 2 2Total Revenues $150.5 $138.0 $140.2 $ 2.2Expenditures $150.4 $143.5 $152.5 $ 9.0Other Financing Uses $ 2.0 $ 1.8 $ 1.9 $ .1g+/- Revenues to Expenses ( $ 1.9) ($ 7.3) ($14.2) ($6.9)Ending Fund Balance $ 8.0 $ 7.6 ($6.6) ($14.2)

10

Key Budget Assumptions

Following are key budget assumptions for 2010-11 based on the Governor’s Budget:Governor’s Budget:

ADA Decrease by 50 ADACOLA Decrease to ( 0 38%) from 50%COLA Decrease to ( 0.38%) from .50%Deficit (18.355%) and a Reduction of $231 per ADA

All other Assumptions for this projection are the same asWhat was presented in the First Interim Financial ReportDecember 2009

11

Other Significant Policy Reforms

The Governor’s Budget proposal includes significant policy reformsReforms will:

Eliminate seniority as a consideration in employment decisionsAllow layoff notification for teachers up to 60 days after the state Allow layoff notification for teachers up to 60 days after the state budget is adoptedEliminate the requirement to give laid-off teachers priority as

b tit t t h t th i f tsubstitute teachers at their former pay rateSuspend most education mandates Allow School Districts to contract for private services currently o Sc oo st cts to co t act o p ate se ces cu e t ybeing performed by district employees

12

Next Steps

Balanced budget must be adopted by district prior to June 30, 2010

State Budget will most likely not be in place by then

Developing the budget requires:

Clarifying assumptions

How much revenue?

How will expenditures change?

Once the State Budget is adopted, the district makes adjustments to its budget within 45 days

13

District Unrestricted Budget Overview Based on Governor’s 2010-11 Budget ProposalsBased on Governor s 2010 11 Budget Proposals

2009-10Adopted

2009-10 Adjusted 2010 11 Adopted

BudgetAdjusted Budget

2010-11 Budget Net Change

Beginning Fund Balance $ 9.9 $ 14.9 $ 7.6 ($ 7.3)RRevenues:

Revenue Limit $145.7 $130.3 $129.9 ($ .4)State $ 22.5 $ 25.3 $ 25.2 $ 0Other Local $ 1.5 $ 2.2 $ 3.3 $ 1.0Sp. Ed. & Other ($19.2) ($19.8) ($18.2) $ 1.6

T t l R $150 5 $138 0 $140 2 $ 2 2Total Revenues $150.5 $138.0 $140.2 $ 2.2Expenditures $150.4 $143.5 $152.5 $ 9.0Other Financing Uses $ 2.0 $ 1.8 $ 1.9 $ .1g+/- Revenues to Expenses ( $ 1.9) ($ 7.3) ($14.2) ($6.9)Ending Fund Balance $ 8.0 $ 7.6 ($6.6) ($14.2)

14

Defining Today’s Budget Problem for 2010-2011 Without a Planned SolutionWithout a Planned Solution

Projected 2010-2011 Budget Shortfall considering Governor's Proposed State Budget $ 14 2 millionconsidering Governor's Proposed State Budget

Inflationary Increases in Projected Expenses for H lth d W lf P i I

$ 14.2 million

Health and Welfare Premium Increases, Unemployment Rate increases, Other Utilities, Reduced Federal Funds for Salaries & Benefits, E h t i (S Ed & T t ti ) $ 5 6 millionEncroachment increases (Sp. Ed. & Transportation)

Total Shortfall without changes

$ 5.6 million

$ 19.8 million

15

Recommended Solutions for 2010-2011 Budget ShortfallShortfall

Ongoing Revenue Increases: Tier III Transfer from Adult Education; Leases (Towers & LPS); Adult Education; Leases (Towers & LPS); Beverage Contract; Energy Incentive One -Time Revenue Increases: Reduce Reserve R i t 1 5% R i i I

$ 2.280 million

Requirement 1.5%; Remaining Insurance Settlement; Calero Lease; Reduce Sp. Ed. & Transportation Encroachment; Reverse Lease D it f C it l F d $ 4 545 illiDeposits from Capital FundsOngoing Expenditure Reductions not Workforce: Renewing Pool Covers; Network upgrade

$ 4.545 million

$ .450 millionOne-Time Expenditure Reductions: Transfer to Restricted Programs; Remaining SFSF for Salary/Benefits $ 3.354 millionTotal Excluding Workforce $10.629 million

16

Recommended Solutions for 2010-2011 Budget ShortfallShortfall

Certificated Positions $ 5.846 million

Administrators/Managers Positions

Cl ifi d P iti

$ .435 million

$ 2 914 illiClassified Positions

Total Workforce

$ 2.914 million

$ 9.195 million

Total Excluding Workforce $10.629 million

Total Plan

Total Shortfall without changes

$ 19.824 million

$ 19.808 million

Balance June 30, 2011 $ 16,000

17

Summary of Budget Plan for 2010/11

2010/11 Projected Ending Balance from 1st Interim 2009/10 $(6,568,000)

Projected Beginning Balance Increase from 2nd Interim 2009/10 $460,000

Projected Decrease in Revenues $(9,842,000)

Projected Increase in Expenditures $3,858,000

P j t d E di B l i 2010/11 $(19 808 000)Projected Ending Balance in 2010/11 $(19,808,000)

18

Recommendation for 2nd Interim

New Revenues

One TimeOne-Time

Final Insurance Settlement $689,000

Increase Transfer from General Reserve $3,150,000

Adjustment Prior Years LPS Lease Deposit $600,000

Increase Lease for Calero $106,000

Projected One-time Revenues $4,545,000

Ongoing

Transfer from Tier III Flex Adult Ed $250,000

New Beverage Contract $150,000

Lease from LPS Charter School $127,000

Lease for Towers $144,000

Energy Incentive Revenue Increase $200,000

Decrease Contribution to Special Ed from Layoffs $1,321,000

Decrease Contribution to Transportation from Layoffs $88,000 from Layoffs

Projected On-going Revenues $2,280,000

Total New Revenues $6,825,000

19

Operation Expenditure ReductionTransfer EL & PI Teachers to Restricted Programs $(932,000)

Transfer Additional Salary & Benefits $(2 422 000)yto SFSF $(2,422,000)

Savings from Reducing Certificated Positions $(5,846,000)

Savings from Not Filling Vacant Administrative Positions $(279,000)

Savings from Reducing Classified Manager Position $(156,000)

Savings from Reducing Classified Positions $(2,914,000)

Savings Gas Cost from Pool Covers $(250,000)g $( , )

Savings from VOIP $(200,000)

Recommended Savings $(12,999,000)

Total of Recommendation to Balance the Budget $19,824,000

Ending Balance - 2010/11 $16,000

20

Questions?Questions?

21

District Budget Study SessionDistrict Budget Study SessionPresentation Outline

Big Picture

Summary

R d d W kf R d i B l Recommended Workforce Reduction to Balance Budget

R i lRationale

Process to Determine Return of Workforce

Community Engagement Calendar

22

Reduction in Workforce:Classified Positions

PositionsNumber of Full-Time

Equivalent Positions (“FTEs”)

Account Clerk II 1.0

Attendance Clerk 11.0

Clerk Typist I 1.5

Clerk Typist II 1 0Clerk Typist II 1.0

Computer Tech Support Engineer 1.0

Custodian 10.0

Department Secretary 2.0

Gardener 5.0

Health Clerk 5.0

IEP Paraeducator 5.0

Job Training Technician 5.25

Library Technician 10.5

Mechanic II 1.0

Paraeducator 15 25Paraeducator 15.25

Team Teaching Clerk .50

Total FTEs 75.0

23

Reduction in Workforce:Reduction in Workforce:Management/Administrative Positions



Coordinator of Risk Management 1.0

Coordinator of Electronic Communications/Coordinator of Electronic Communications/Surveillance Systems 1.0

Coordinator of Testing, Evaluation & Research 1.0

Director of Human Resources 1.0

T t l FTE 4 0Total FTEs 4.0

24

Reduction in Workforce:Certificated Positions



Activity Director 6 6Activity Director 6.6

Counselor 36.0

Psychologist 6.0

MST Coordinator 10.0

Subject Area Coordinator – Art 0.2

Subject Area Coordinator – Business 0.2

Subject Area Coordinator – Counseling 0.2

Subject Area Coordinator Health/PhysicalSubject Area Coordinator – Health/Physical Education 0.2

Subject Area Coordinator – Library Services 0.2

Subject Area Coordinator – Science 0.2

S bj A C di S i l S di 0 2Subject Area Coordinator – Social Studies 0.2

Social Worker 4.0

Math Teacher 2.2

Biology Teacher 2.4gy

Social Science Teacher 1.4

English Teacher 3.2

Total FTEs 73.2

25

District BeliefsVisionWe provide an educational experience that enables ll d h h i hi h i lall students to reach their highest potential.

MissionMissionOur mission, in partnership with families and community, is to educate students and prepare y, p pthem for the future in a safe and engaging environment.

26

Board GoalsGoalsClose the Achievement Gap while improving the O ll A d i P fOverall Academic Performance

Develop and Implement an Academic Master Plan Develop and Implement an Academic Master Plan that includes the following elements: Programs and Services, Workforce and Facilities,

Maximize all Funding Opportunities while being ll blFiscally Responsible

27

Board ChallengesBalance the budget without negatively affecting student achievement;Close the achievement gap – increase the graduation rate – reduce the dropout rate;Maintain a cohesive, collaborative organization in the face of extreme budget cuts;Fi d l i i f h i l f Find alternative strategies for the survival of crucial programs impacted by budget cuts

28

h bl h dChanging Variables to the Budget Over the Next Nine Weeks

May Revise (New Budget Assumptions)New LegislationR t Th TRace to The TopGrantsProgram RedesignProgram RedesignFreezes in Current SpendingBargainingg gNormal Work Force Attrition

29

As Change OccursWhat are the priorities for making decisions?

What are the guidelines for bringing back staff and / or services?

Use criteria/weighting that differentiates by site?

30

District PrioritiesInstructionSafetyCl SiClass SizeSafety “Nets” for StudentsTechnologyTechnologyEnvironment: Clean and SafeCo‐curricular Activities and SupportppInfrastructure Support

31

Criteria to ConsiderBasic services for all schoolsTitle I Schools that are School WideTitle I Schools that Target Specific PopulationsProgram Improvement SchoolsG d i R / D RGraduation Rate / Dropout RateCAHSEE Passage Rate“A G” C l ti R t“A–G” Completion RateParent Education

32

Programs To ReviewProgram Redesign ‐‐ Traditional Encroachment Programs – Food Services,Child C T i S i l Ed iChild Care; Transportation; Special Education

SecurityA hl iAthleticsSBNs

33

Budget RecommendationsWorkforce ReductionsWorkforce Reductions

Setting PrioritiesSetting Priorities

Community CalendarCommunity Calendar

Budget Recommendation: gWorkforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Activity Director

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedActivity Directors

FTE R d ti 6 6 FTE• FTE Reduction 6.6 FTE

• Student Impact All students grades 9-12

• Program Impact Negatively impacts co-curricular activities

34

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Activity Director @ __________

A I t (N d f S i )A. Importance (Need of Service)

1 = Somewhat Important2 = Important3 Criticall Important

___________

3 = Critically Important

B. Equity (Differentiate Need of Service)

1 = Somewhat Important ___________p2 = Important3 = Critically Important

___________

C. Number of Students Impacted by Restoration

1 = Somewhat Important2 = Important3 = Critically Important

___________

Total Score (A x B x C) ___________

35

Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Counselor

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedCounselors



• Program Impact Limits guidance services district wide; limits safety net f t d t li it ll /for students; limits college / career planning

36

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Counselor @ __________

A I t (N d f S i ) D th t k ?A. Importance (Need of Service); Does the task go away?; Is the task tied to student achievement?

1 = Somewhat Important2 Important

_____3______

2 = Important3 = Critically Important

B. Equity (Differentiate Need of Service); Consequence of not performing the service?


_____3______

C. Number of Students Impacted by restoration

1 = Somewhat Important2 = Important

_____3______2 Important3 = Critically Important

Total Score (A x B x C) _____27______

37

Budget Recommendation: gWorkforce Reduction ‐‐‐MST Coordinator

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedMST Coordinators



• Program Impact Negatively impacts coordination of CBO

i S f tservices on campus; Safety net for students eliminated

38

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of MST Coordinator @ __________



___________




___________



___________


39

Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Psychologist

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedPsychologists



• Program Impact Negatively impacts special education assessments; li i t f t t feliminates safety net for

students

40

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Psychologist @ __________



___________




___________



___________


41

Budget Recommendation: gWork Force Reduction ‐‐‐ Subject Area Coordinator

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedSubject Area Coordinators



• Program Impact Negatively impacts coherence of instructional program

42

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Subject Area Coordinator @ __________



___________




___________



___________


43

Budget Recommendation: WorkForce Reduction ‐‐‐ Social Worker

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedSocial Workers

• FTE Reduction 4 0 FTE• FTE Reduction 4.0 FTE

S d I G d 9 12 St d t• Student Impact Grades 9 -12; Student referrals

• Program Impact Negatively impacts direct services to schools and supervision of Socialsupervision of Social Worker Interns; eliminates safety net for students

44

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Social Workers @ __________



___________




___________



___________


45

Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Teacher

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedTeachers in selected areas


• Student Impact Across the curriculum in mathematics, biology, social science and Englishscience, and English

• Program Impact Maintains class loads established for 2009-10;EL Program design change

46

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Teacher @ __________



___________




___________



___________


47

Budget Recommendation: g

Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Account Clerk II

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedAccount Clerk II


• Student Impact None – Staff support function

• Program Impact Duties will be shifted to other staff with time delays related t i t dto services expected

48

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Account Clerk II @ __________



___________




___________



___________


49

Budget Recommendation:Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Attendance Clerk

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedAttendance Clerks


• Student Impact Grades 9-12; Slower follow-up due to the volume

• Program Impact Posting of attendance will take longer

50

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Attendance Clerk @ __________



___________




___________



___________


51

Budget Recommendation:Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Clerk Typist I

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedClerk Typist I


• Student Impact MST assistance referral services eliminated

• Program Impact Services no longer available

52

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Clerk Typist I @ __________



___________




___________



___________


53

Budget Recommendation:Budget Recommendation: Work Force Reduction ‐‐‐ Clerk Typist II

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedClerk Typist II


• Student Impact MST assistance for referral services eliminated

• Program Impact Services no longer available

54

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Clerk Typist II @ __________



___________




___________



___________


55

Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐

Computer Technical Support Engineer

R d th b f• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Computer Technical Support Engineerg

• FTE Reduction 1.0 FTE

• Student Impact Student and staff will have a time delay with getting

f ddsoftware add to computers• Program Impact Problem Solving of

complicated software andcomplicated software and installation will require vendor intervention

56

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Computer Technical Engineer @ ________



___________




___________



___________


57

Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Custodian

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedCustodians


• Student Impact Set up for student events limited

• Program Impact Larger area of the campus to be cleaned by remaining St ff L ti fStaff; Less time for non custodial functions

58

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Custodian @ __________



___________




___________



___________


59

Budget Recommendation:Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Department Secretary

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Department Secretary


• Student Impact Position supports staff

• Program Impact Shifting of responsibilities to other staff members

60

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Department Secretary @ __________



___________




___________



___________


61

Budget Recommendation:Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Gardener

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedGardeners


• Student Impact Campus appearance

• Program Impact Larger area to be covered by remaining Staff

62

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Gardener @ __________



___________




___________



___________


63

Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐Health Clerk

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedHealth Clerks


• Student Impact Students will be directed to other staff members for assistanceassistance

• Program Impact Sources redirected to other staff members – Record function to be determined

64

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Health Clerk @ __________



___________




___________



___________


65

Budget Recommendation:Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ IEP Para Educators

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedIEP Para Educators


• Student Impact None, students aging out of program

• Program Impact Neutral -- Ratio determined by IEP need.

66

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of IEP Para Educators @ __________



___________




___________



___________


67

Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Job Training Technicians

R d th b f• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Job Training Technicians


• Student Impact Neutral, students aging out of programof program

• Program Impact None, number determined by eligible pool of students

68

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Job Training Technician @ __________



___________




___________



___________


69

B d t R d tiBudget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Library Technician

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Library Technicians


• Student Impact Library Services will be severely reducedy

• Program Impact Maintenance of the Library will not existwill not exist

70

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Library Technician @ __________



___________




___________



___________


71

Budget Recommendation:Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐Mechanic II

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Mechanic II


• Student Impact None

• Program Impact Delays in repairing district vehicles

72

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Mechanic II @ __________



___________




___________



___________


73

Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Para Educator

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Action ProposedPara Educators


• Student Impact Greater ratio of students to staff and less support for staffstaff

• Program Impact Fewer Para Educators to assist in classrooms

74

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Para Educator @ __________



___________




___________



___________


75

Budget Recommendation: Workforce Reduction ‐‐‐ Team Teaching Clerk

• Action Proposed Reduce the number of Team Teaching Clerks

• FTE Reduction .50 FTE

• Student Impact Services will not be provided

• Program Impact No clerical support will be Program Impact ppavailable to the program

76

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Team Teaching Clerk @ __________



___________




___________



___________


77

Budget Recommendation: gWorkforce Reduction ‐‐

Coordinator of Risk Management

• Action Proposed Eliminate the position of Risk Management


• Student Impact Supports Staff

• Program Impact Less efficient to distribute g ptasks to other Managers

78

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Coordinator of Risk Management @ ______



___________

3 = Critically ImportantB. Equity (Differentiate Need of Service)

1 = Somewhat Important ___________2 = Important3 = Critically Important



___________

T t l S (A B C)Total Score (A x B x C) ___________

79

Budget Recommendation: Work Force Reduction

Coordinator of Electronic Communications / Surveillance Systems

Eli i t th iti f• Action Proposed Eliminate the position of Coordinator of Electronic Communications / Surveillance SystemsSystems

• FTE Reduction 1.0 FTEFTE Reduction 1.0 FTE

• Student Impact Coordinates electronic• Student Impact Coordinates electronic communications

P I t Less efficient to distribute• Program Impact Less efficient to distribute tasks to other managers

80

Setting PrioritiesSetting PrioritiesAction: Restoration of Coordinator of Electronic Communications

/ Surveillance Systems @ __________y @ __________A. Importance (Need of Service)

1 = Somewhat Important2 = Important

___________2 = Important3 = Critically Important



___________

C. Number of Students Impacted by RestorationC. Number of Students Impacted by Restoration


___________

3 Critically Important


81

CALENDAR OF MEETINGSCALENDAR OF MEETINGSDate Time Location

March 8, 2010 3:00 p.m.

March 15, 2010 3:00 p.m.

March 16, 2010 3:00 p.m.

March 22, 2010 3:00 p.m.

March 24, 2010 3:00 p.m.

March 25, 2010 3:00 p.m., p

March 29, 2010 3:00 p.m.

March 31, 2010 3:00 p.m.

A il 7 2010 4 00April 7, 2010 4:00 p.m.

April 8, 2010 3:00 p.m.

April 12, 2010 3:00 p.m.

April 14, 2010 3:00 p.m.

April 19, 2010 3:00 p.m.

82

Date post:	15-Feb-2021
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

Budget Study Session Presentation 20100306...Mar 06, 2010 · 2010-11 1st Interim vs 201011 1st...

Documents