Date post: | 24-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Building a Data-Driven School
Hilary SheaSeptember 26, 2006
Words to the Wise
• Building a data driven school takes a lot of time
• Real change does not happen overnight
• It is not enough for a plan to look good on paper
• Best data system means nothing if data is not used
• Making data-based decisions impacts all parts of school life, not just instruction
• It is essential to set realistic and attainable goals
The Big Picture
• Interlocking system of teams
• Efficient data management
• Effective meetings
• Meaningful peer observation
• Real internal accountability
InterlockingSystem of Teams
• Time to meet
• Strong Instructional Leadership Team
• Communication between teams
EfficientData Management
• Data coordinator
• Data inventory
• Data binder
Effective Meetings
• Careful planning
• Use of protocols
• Teacher leadership
• Action-oriented
MeaningfulPeer Observation
• Frequent visits
• Shared language for discussing instruction
• Beyond “culture of nice”
RealInternal Accountability
All staff accountable to
each other for:
• Productive meetings
• Learning together
• Improving practice
Zooming In
Efficient
Data
Management
Four steps to successful data collection
1. Create a data inventory
2. Assemble and maintain a data binder
3. Develop data templates for recording raw data from each assessment
4. Create data displays that summarize information from raw data
1. Data Inventory
Answers the questions:
• Which assessments do we use?
• Who is tested?
• When?
• Why?
• What happens to the data?
2. Data Binder
• Choose level: school, grade, class, student
• Choose organization: by subject, assessment, and/or teacher
• Plan maintenance: decide what roles data team, teachers will play
3. Data Templates
• Start with big picture: what do you want to know?
• Address details: what info should you include on form?
• Plan structure: make it easy to use and to read
What Not To Do…
TOO MUCH DATA GOING ON!
Example 1:Guided Reading Template
Grade 2Instructional Reading Levels
Sep-05 C D E F G H I J K L M N O
Jan-06 C D E F G H I J K L M N O
The Form Alone Provides a Helpful Visual
The gray column denotes the end-of-year grade level benchmark.
The two arrows highlight one student’s progress from the fall assessment to the winter assessment.
At the classes current rate of improvement the majority of students will be at or above grade level by the Spring.
Looking at Charts from Year to Year
The yellow boxes highlight two students progress from kindergarten to second grade. Both students were placed in Reading Recovery in 1st Grade.
Both students finished second grade at nearly benchmark level.
Example 2:Writing Prompt Template
6 Trait Rubric
Fall, Winter, and Spring Scores
4. Data Displays
• Visual representation of specific aspects of the raw data
• Can be generated from the data entered into Excel templates
• Can inform classroom-level and school-wide discussions
Displays Allow Data to Drive Instruction
Word Choice
0123456789
10
1 2 3 4 5
Score
Nu
mb
er o
f S
tud
ents
FALL:
WINTER:
SPRING:
Charts are created for each trait
Charts are used to identify areas of strength and weakness across grades and across the schools
The data is used to inform mini-lessons, the focus of CCL, and identifying needs in the scope and sequence between grades.
Helpful Hints
• Hold teachers accountable for submitting their classroom data on time.
• Use the data in meaningful and relevant ways…you can’t have data-driven instruction without using the data!
• Go electronic so data is recorded on a standardized form and automatically stored in multiple places.
Questions?
Data in Action:The Development of an Action Plan to Improve Reader’s Notebooks
©Hilary Shea, June 2006
Data on Learner-Centered Problem
4th Grade ELA MCAS from last two years: average score on open response questions is 2.3 out of 4.
Reader’s Response Notebooks: entries are weak in organization and thesis development.
Guided Reading Assessments: students perform worse on the open response question than on the oral portion of the test
©Hilary Shea, June 2006©Hilary Shea, June 2006
4th Grade ELA MCAS 2004-05
Average Open Response Score for Students Who Received a Grade of Proficient
22.5
3
2
32.5 2.5
2
3
2
3
43.5
0
1
2
3
4
Stude
nt A
Stude
nt B
Stude
nt C
Stude
nt D
Stude
nt E
Stude
nt F
Stude
nt G
Stude
nt H
Stude
nt I
Stude
nt J
Stude
nt K
Stude
nt L
Stude
nt M
Students
Sco
res
©Hilary Shea, June 2006©Hilary Shea, June 2006
Learner-Centered Problem
Students are unable to consistently respond
and reflect when writing about texts they have read
independently or with the class.
©Hilary Shea, June 2006©Hilary Shea, June 2006
Data on Problem of Practice
Reader’s Response Notebooks
Fall CCL reflection on practice: teachers identified ineffective use of reader’s notebooks as a problem
Ongoing Observation: principal and coach found teachers not effectively using mini-lessons as a means to teach written responses to text.
©Hilary Shea, June 2006©Hilary Shea, June 2006
Problem of Practice
Teachers are not effectively using the Reader’s Notebook as a forum for students
to respond and reflect in writing about what they read.
©Hilary Shea, June 2006©Hilary Shea, June 2006
Statement of Solution
Devote this spring’s intermediate CCL to supporting teachers in
using Reader’s Notebooks more effectively.
©Hilary Shea, June 2006©Hilary Shea, June 2006
What will we do?
Create statement of purpose for Reader’s Notebook
Use student letters as the primary data source
Create rubric for assessing letters
Create grade-level expectations for letters
©Hilary Shea, June 2006©Hilary Shea, June 2006
What will we do? (continued)
Model lessons on different types of letters Prompted Non-prompted Topic cards
Model mini-lessons related to improving letters
Generate exemplars for all grades
©Hilary Shea, June 2006©Hilary Shea, June 2006
What will we see in classrooms?
Effective mini-lessons
High-quality student letters (from students of all ability levels)
Notebooks that include both non-prompted and prompted letters
©Hilary Shea, June 2006©Hilary Shea, June 2006
What will we see in classrooms? (continued)
High-quality teacher responses to letters, that have the purpose of improving their content
Use of the rubric and exemplars in all classes
Use of notebooks as means of assessment
©Hilary Shea, June 2006©Hilary Shea, June 2006
How will we confirm that classroom changes are occurring?
Peer observations
Principal and coach learning walks
Focus groups
©Hilary Shea, June 2006©Hilary Shea, June 2006
Where will we look for evidence of improved student learning?
Reader’s Notebooks: Prolific and high-quality letters from all students
Classroom reading response assessments: Well-organized, well developed answers (teachers can use students’ actual letters as the means of assessment)
4th Grade ELA MCAS: Improvement on open response questions
©Hilary Shea, June 2006©Hilary Shea, June 2006
Potential Pitfalls
Keeping up the momentum following the spring CCL
Effectively using student letters during looking at student work sessions
Monitoring teachers’ use of the rubric and exemplars after this year
©Hilary Shea, June 2006©Hilary Shea, June 2006