+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Building A Solution Strategy - Upstate New York … SCSI & Fibre Channel attached disk subsystems...

Building A Solution Strategy - Upstate New York … SCSI & Fibre Channel attached disk subsystems...

Date post: 20-May-2018
Category:
Upload: dohuong
View: 215 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
29
© 2010 IBM Corporation IBM Power Systems Building A Solution Strategy Oracle on Power 7 Architecture Jim Smith Systems Architect IBM Enterprise Systems [email protected]
Transcript

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

Building A Solution Strategy

Oracle on Power 7 Architecture

Jim Smith

Systems Architect

IBM Enterprise Systems

[email protected]

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

IBM – only systems provider with complete story

IBM HP Oracle / SUN DELL

Mainframe NA NA NA

Platinum standard for

reliability, availability

and security

Power Itanium SPARC NA

Undisputed

RISC/UNIX market

leader

Architecture falling

further behind – future

doubtful

Losing market share –

customers migrating

No offerings

x86 x86 x86 x86

Market leader in +4-

way enterprise

workload servers

Strong competitor –

overall market leader

“Want a be” – selling

into existing install

base primarily

Strong GB competitor

– still not a top of mind

in most enterprises

•IBM Advantages:

Unique ability to offer architecture/platform that best fits enterprise customer requirements/environments

Already delivering workload optimized solutions

Only provider offering the highest qualities of service available with choice of System z mainframe, Power, or System x

Ability to leverage „breadth‟ of IBM – Services, Financing, Storage, Software

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

System

z

System

x

Power

Time HorizonISV Support

Non-functional

Requirements

Environmental

Constraints

Strategic Direction

TCO ModelSkills

Politics

Architecture

Technology

Adoption

Deployment

Model

Scale

Geographic

Considerations

Pla

tfo

rm c

ap

ab

ilit

y

Platform A Platform B

•Local Factors

•Local Factors

Local factors affect platform selection

Apollo 13

Local Factors Matter

• Skills

• Technology adoption

• Management

• Volume of servers

• Organizational

• Balancing Strategic and Tactical Requirements

Infrastructure Size Matters

• Changes people dynamics

• Increases handoffs

• Affects testing, patching, etc

Workload Matters

Fit for purpose Highlights:

Cost & Chargeback models may distort the selection process

•Business Applications

•Transaction Processing and Database

•Web, Collaboration •and Infrastructure

•Analytics and •High Performance

•TCA ≠ TCO

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

+/- 10%

30 - 60% 25 - 50%

+/- 20%

The justification in spending $$ on better technology is in theeffect on software, personnel and environmental expense..

AND you get better technology

2009

IDC Estimates - 2009

Oracle Solution Costs

Software People

Environment Hardware

Cost Trends

© 2007

• Coopertion is alive and well

© 2007

IBM-Oracle International Competency Center

• Sizing Tools

Creation and ownership of

worldwide sizing tools and

processes

Support the Techline

resources

• Technical Sales Support

IBM Technical Sales

Business Partners

On-site briefings

• Third level support when

necessary

• On-Site Resources

IBM Hardware andSoftware Brand Experts

Technology Managers

Solutions Sales

Project Managers

• Labs

Located at Oracle and IBM

Benchmarking/Sizing tests

Redbooks and whitepapers

Mission:

Provide technical pre-sales solution support for Oracle

applications and technology with IBM platforms including:

PeopleSoft, JD Edwards, Siebel, EBS, and others.

• Coopertion is alive and well

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Q39

9

Q10

0

Q30

0

Q10

1

Q30

1

Q10

2

Q30

2

Q10

3

Q30

3

Q10

4

Q30

4

Q10

5

Q30

5

Q10

6

Q30

6

Q10

7

Q30

7

Q10

8

Q30

8

Q10

9

Q30

9

HP Sun IBM

Source: IDC Quarterly Server Tracker Q409 release, February 2010

World Wide UNIX Server Rolling Four Quarter Average Revenue Share

Customers are moving to higher value …as shown by the largest shift of customer spending in UNIX History

In 2009 IBM Unix server revenue exceeded 50% share in NA.

In 2009 IBM Unix revenue share exceeded 40% world wide

1) IBM has been the #1 Unix vendor world-wide since 2004 (IDC)

2) IBM’s growth is from competitive conversions / migration

3) 70% of the database instances running on Power are Oracle

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

Power Systems Portfolio

Power 595

Power 520 Power 755JS Blades

Power 770

Power 750

Power 780

Power 575

Power 550

Power 570

HPC

Consistency Binary compatibility

Mainframe-inspired reliability

Advanced Virtualization

AIX, Linux and IBM i OS

Complete flexibility for workload

deployment

Power 700701 & 702

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

POWER6

Memory+

GX+ Bridge

Memory+

GX Bus Cntrl Mem

ory

Cn

trl

Mem

ory

Cn

trl

Fabric BusController

CoreAlti

Vec

L3Ctrl

L3L3Ctrl

L3

CoreAlti

Vec

4 MB L2

4 MB L2

Core

L2

Core

L2

Memory Interface

Core

L2

Core

L2

Core

L2

Core

L2

Core

L2

Core

L2

GX

SMP

FABRIC

POWER

BUS

POWER7

Memory++

L3 CacheeDRAM

Cores: Up to 8 Intelligent Cores / chip (socket)

4 and 6 Intelligent Cores available on some models

12 execution units per core

Out of order execution

4 Way SMT per core

32 threads per chip

L1 – 32 KB I Cache / 32 KB D Cache per core

L2 – 256 KB per core

Chip: 32MB Intelligent L3 Cache on chip

Memory: Dual DDR3 Controllers

100 GB/s sustained Memory bandwidth / chip

Scalability:

Up to 32 Sockets

360 GB/s peak SMP bandwidth / chip

590 GB/s peak I/O bandwidth / chip

Up to 20,000 coherent operations in flight

Energy: Aggressive processor Nap & Sleep modes

10% “Over clock” when thermals are good

Built for Oracle Performance Leadership

Linux

3 Cores

AIX V5.3

3Cores

Power Systems Partitioning - Value to Oracle

AIXV5.3

Dynamically Resizable

2Cores

AIXV6.1

5Cores

1Cores

Linux

POWER Hypervisor

Linux

2 Cores

CUoD

8Cores

24 Cores

128GB Memory

AIX, Linux, i

Linux

3 Cores

AIX V5.3

3Cores

Power Systems Virtualization - Value to Oracle

Virtual I/O server

Shared Ethernet

Shared SCSI & Fibre

Channel attached disk

subsystems

AIXV5.3

Dynamically Resizable

2Cores

AIXV6.1

5Cores

6 Cores

1Cores

Linux

Micro-Partitioning Feature

Share processors

across multiple

partitions

Minimum partition

1/10th core

254 partition maximum

AIX V5.3/6.1, Linux, &

IBM i

Virtual I/O paths L

inu

x

AIX

V6

.1

AIX

V6

.1

IBM

i

AIX

V5

.3

AIX

V5

.3

Lin

ux

Micro-partitioning

Network

Linux

EthernetSharing

StorageSharing

Int VirtManager

Virtual I/O Server

Partition

POWER Hypervisor

Linux

2 Cores

CUoD

8Cores

Ora

cle

10

g

Ora

cle

11

g

Ora

cle

9i

Ora

cle

10

g

Ora

cle

11

g

Ora

cle

9i

Ora

cle

10

g

PowerVM’s

Linux

3 Cores

AIX V5.3

3Cores

Power Systems for Oracle

– DB Consolidation, Virtualization –

Dynamically Resizable

24 Cores

1Cores

Linux

Ora

cle

10

g

Ora

cle

11

g

Ora

cle

9i

Ora

cle

10

g

Ora

cle

11

g

Ora

cle

9i

Ora

cle

10

g

PowerVM’s

Network

Linux

EthernetSharing

StorageSharing

Int VirtManager

Virtual I/O Server

Partition

POWER Hypervisor

CUoD

8Cores

1Cores

Linux

Network

Linux

EthernetSharing

StorageSharing

Int VirtManager

Virtual I/O Server

Partition

Oracle 10gR2

8 Cores

AIX V5.3

6Cores

Ora

cle

11

g

1 Core 1 Core

ISV Pricing on Power 48 core system

Oracle EE: 38 cores

Do not pay for VIO server or CUoD cores

Linux

3 Cores

AIX V5.3

3Cores

Power Systems Virtualization - Value to Oracle

Virtual I/O server

Shared Ethernet

Shared SCSI & Fibre

Channel attached disk

subsystems

11g

Dynamically Resizable

2Cores

WAS

5Cores

6 Cores

1Cores

Linux

Micro-Partitioning Feature

Share processors

across multiple

partitions

Minimum partition

1/10th core

254 partition maximum

AIX V5.3/6.1, Linux, &

IBM i

Virtual LAN

Lin

ux

AIX

V6

.1

AIX

V6

.1

IBM

i

AIX

V5

.3

AIX

V5

.3

Lin

ux

Micro-partitioning

POWER Hypervisor

Cognos

2 Cores

CUoD

8Cores

Ora

cle

10

g

Ora

cle

11

g

Ora

cle

9i

Ora

cle

10

g

Ora

cle

11

g

WA

S

Ora

cle

10

g

PowerVM’s

Linux

3 Cores

AIX V5.3

3Cores

Power Systems Virtualization for Oracle

– Tier Consolidation & Virtualization –

Dynamically Resizable

24 Cores

1Cores

Linux

Ora

cle

10

g

Ora

cle

11

g

Ora

cle

9i

Ora

cle

10

g

Ora

cle

11

g

Ora

cle

9i

Ora

cle

10

g

PowerVM’s

Network

Linux

EthernetSharing

StorageSharing

Int VirtManager

Virtual I/O Server

Partition

POWER Hypervisor

16 Cores

CUoD

8Cores

1Cores

Linux

Network

Linux

EthernetSharing

StorageSharing

Int VirtManager

Virtual I/O Server

Partition

Linux

8 Cores

AIX V5.3

6Cores

Virtual LANO

rac

le 1

0g

Ora

cle

11

g

1 Core 1 Core

PowerVM’s

ISV Pricing on Power 64 core system

Oracle EE: 38 cores

WebSphere: 1920 PVUs

Do not pay for VIO server or CUoD cores

Virtual Network WebSphere to Oracle works at memory speeds

Tier Consolidation

Web

Sp

here

Web

Sp

here

Web

Sp

here

Web

Sp

here

Web

Sp

here

© 2010 IBM Corporation15

IBM Power Systems and Storage Competitive Education

Customer Oracle DB Shared Pool

© 2010 IBM Corporation16

IBM Power Systems and Storage Competitive Education

Consolidating Workloads Optimizes Efficiency

Single workload model– Average: 21%; Peak: 79%

– Random arrival rate

As copies are added– Average approaches peak

– Total CPU grows at slower rate

Single Application Server (2

CPUs)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Average 21%, Peak 79%

8 to 1 Consolidation (8 CPUs)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Average 39%, Peak 76%

64 to 1 Consolidation (36 CPUs)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Average 61%, Peak 78%

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

Active Memory Expansion & Active Memory SharingValue To Oracle

Active Memory ExpansionEffectively gives more memory

capacity to the partition using compression / decompression of the contents in true memory

AIX partitions only

Active Memory SharingMoves memory from one partition

to anotherBest fit when one partition is not

busy when another partition is busy

AXI, IBM i, and Linux partitions

0

5

10

15#10

#9

#8

#7

#6

#5

#4

#3

#2

#1

Delivering the KEY Component of Resource Efficiency

Power7

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

TPC-C POWER7 vs. Competition (per core results)

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

TPC-C/Core

POWER7

Nehalem-EX

Nehalem-EP

Itanium/2

Opteron

SPARC(Niagara)

www.tpc.org

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

Designed with the capacity for consolidation

You can use the

tremendous capacity of

the IBM Power™ 780 to

run challenging

applications in every

virtual server.

System data for HP from the HP Superdome Datasheet available at www.hp.com. System data for Sun from the Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000 Datasheet available at www.sun.com. Both are current as of 1/27/2010

Memory per core

Memory bandwidthper core

I/O bandwidthper core

Capacity per core relative to the Power 780

IBM Power 780 HP SuperDome Sun M9000

Cores 32 128 256

Memory (GB) 2,048 2,048 4096

Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) 1,088 273 737

I/O Bandwidth (GB/s) 236 173 234

Memory (GB) per core 64 16 16

Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) per core 34 2.13 2.88

I/O Bandwidth (GB/s) per core 7.3 1.35 0.91

Per

Co

reP

er

Syste

m

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

Server Scalability, Utilization, and Throughput

Throughput measures work– Requires performance objective

– Can be higher with discretionary

work

Factors that affect throughput– Cache or data coherence

– Contention for shared resources

– Path length and latency

– Balanced system design

Mixed workloads require a robust

platform design

Isolated capacity – Dedicated servers or partitions

– Passive clusters

– Separate production and

non-production servers

– Business decision

© 2010 IBM Corporation21

IBM Power Systems and Storage Competitive Education

Source for full survey on : http://itic-

corp.com/blog/2009/07/itic-2009-global-server-

hardware-server-os-reliability-survey-results/

One of Several Industry Studies Confirming Power Availability

© 2010 IBM Corporation22

IBM Power Systems and Storage Competitive EducationRAC on Power Solution Benefits

Power RAC nodes deliver higher availability than x86 nodes

- Fewer forced failover situations (RAC failovers deliver less performance and higher potential for problems)

- Less potential for "phantom failures"

Power RAC nodes deliver greater performance

- Less nodes required for horizontal scaling (Power7 has 40% greater performance per node than x86)

- Lower resource per node required (lower hardware, software and support costs required)

- Virtual LAN communication between application and DB tiers (high speed communication)

Power RAC nodes drive significant resource efficiency through virtualization (PowerVM)

- PowerVM enables workload driven dynamic adding and removing of node resources

- React to changing workload requirements without over configuring node resources

- VIO server reduces LAN and SAN costs of RAC environment

- Dynamic sharing of RAC and non RAC workload resources running on the node

- VMware not supported so x86 nodes have dedicated resources

Power RAC clusters easier to maintain

- Fewer nodes required for performance and scalability

- Less software and hardware components to manage, upgrade and repair

Power RAC: Architecting for Lowest Total Solution Cost

- Higher performance per node equals less hardware and software acquisition costs

- PowerVM drives high resource efficiency, lowers node resource requirements and RAC software costs

- Lower cost for non production requirements (test, disaster recovery)

- Lower node failure potential equals less potential effect on production delivery

- Power7 RAC node has a declining cost trend so future requirements will cost less than today.

- Oracle RAC software has an increasing cost trend so Power nodes reduce that effect

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

Power your planet

LPAR-1

Hypervisor

LPAR-4LPAR-1 LPAR-2 LPAR-3 LPAR-4

AIX Kernel AIX Kernel AIX Kernel AIX Kernel AIX Kernel AIX Kernel AIX Kernel AIX Kernel

P

LPAR-2VIOS

Def 1

Def 2

Def 3

Def 4

SAN

Hypervisor

Ethernet

Partition Mobility Requires:• POWER6• AIX 5.3 / 6.1 or Linux • All resources must be “Virtualized”

•No real resources• SAN storage environment

•SAN Boot, temp space, same network

Partition Mobility StepsValidationCopy memory pagesHost to target systems

TransferTurn off Host resourcesActivate Target resources

P P P P P P P

P P

PP P P P

P

LPAR-3

P P P

P P P

Boot

Data

P P

P P

PP P

P P

P

Oracle Oracle

Def 2

P P

LPAR-3

MigrationController

VIOS

MigrationController

Reduce impact of planned outages, relocate workloads to enable growth, provision new

technology with no disruption to service

Live Partition Mobility On ALL Workloads

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

POWER7 systems are over twice as good as POWER6 systems!

Twice the performance:Power 780 32-core performance per core is over twice

the Power 570 32-core

Twice the scaling:Power 770 and 780 both offer twice the number of

cores as the largest Power 570

Twice the capacity:Power 770 and 780 offer more than twice (~3 times) the

throughput of the largest Power 570

Twice the memory:- Over twice the physical memory of the Power 570

- Active Memory ExpansionTM enables up to twice the

effective memory compared to what is physically

installed

Twice the energy efficiency:Power 770 & 780 offer over twice the performance per

watt (up to 3 times) than the most efficient Power 570

Twice the resources for the same price:Buy twice the cores with the Power 770 and pay less

than a comparable POWER6 based Power 570

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

System Performance – workload throughput per resource

Scalability – investment protection

Virtualization – do more with less

Dynamic – shift resource to workloads

High Resource Utilization - use more of what you own

Reliability – higher service levels

Deliverable Road Map

Significant improvements at lower cost

Proven Power Systems Values For Oracle

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

Disclaimers

This information could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically made to the information herein; these changes will be incorporated in new editions of this publication. IBM may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described in this publication at any time without notice.

This publication was produced in the United States. IBM may not offer the products, services, or feature discussed in this document in all countries. Consult your local IBM representative for information on the products and services currently available in your area.

The following are trademarks of the International Business Machines Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. For a complete list of IBM Trademarks, see www.ibm.com/legal/copytrade.shtml: System p, System p5, POWER5, POWER5+, POWER6.

The following are trademarks or registered trademarks of other companies:UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group in the United States and other countries or both.Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States, other countries, or both.Other company, product, or service names may be trademarks or service marks of others.

IBM hardware products are manufactured from new parts, or new and serviceable used parts.

Regardless, our warranty terms apply.

Information is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind.

Prices are suggested US list prices and are subject to change without notice. Starting price may not include a hard drive, operating system or other features.

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

Disclaimers

rPerf (Relative Performance) is an estimate of commercial processing performance relative to other IBM UNIX systems. It is derived from an IBM analytical model which uses characteristics from IBM internal workloads, TPC and SPEC benchmarks. The rPerf model is not intended to represent any specific public benchmark results and should not be reasonably used in that way. The model simulates some of the system operations such as CPU, cache and memory. However, the model does not simulate disk or network I/O operations .rPerf estimates are calculated based on systems with the latest levels of AIX and other pertinent software at the time of system announcement. Actual performance will vary based on application and configuration specifics. The IBM eServer pSeries 640 is the baseline reference system and has a value of 1.0. Although rPerf may be used to approximate relative IBM UNIX commercial processing performance, actual system performance may vary and is dependent upon many factors including system hardware configuration and software design and configuration. Note that the rPerf methodology used for the POWER6 systems is identical to that used for the POWER5 systems. Variations in incremental system performance may be observed in commercial workloads due to changes in the underlying system architecture.

All performance estimates are provided "AS IS" and no warranties or guarantees are expressed or implied by IBM. Buyers should consult other sources of information, including system benchmarks, and application sizing guides to evaluate the performance of a system they are considering buying. For additional information about rPerf, contact your local IBM office or IBM authorized reseller.

© 2010 IBM Corporation

IBM Power Systems

Disclaimers

RPE2 (Relative Performance Estimate 2) is not a benchmark, but is a performance estimate from a third party IT research company, Ideas International (IDEAS). It is important that you understand what RPE2 is and how to use it for competitive server comparisons. RPE2 is entirely theoretical and is largely based on performance data from the manufacturers supplemented by published benchmark performance data. It is not designed to predict actual performance in a real-world environment.

RPE2 is the geometric mean of five industry standard (TPC-C, TPC-H, SPECjbb2005, SPECint_rate2006, SPECfp_rate2006) benchmarks and one ISV specific (SAP SD 2-Tier) benchmark. They are equally weighted in an arbitrary manner with each benchmark accounting for 16.7% of the total. When one or more of the six benchmarks was not run for a specific server model, IDEAS estimates the benchmark result using vendor supplied relative performance data. If performance is key to any final decision, then other performance data, such as actual workload benchmarking, should be used.

All performance estimates are provided "AS IS" and no warranties or guarantees are expressed or implied by IBM. Buyers should consult other sources of information, including system benchmarks, and application sizing guides to evaluate the performance of a system they are considering buying. For additional information about rPerf, contact your local IBM office or IBM authorized reseller.


Recommended