+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education...

Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education...

Date post: 11-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: marshall-wilkins
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
14
Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota [email protected] - http://www.ce.umn.edu/~smith/ Michigan State University College of Natural Science Workshop September 2009
Transcript
Page 1: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

Building and Managing Successful Teams –

Team Decision Making

Karl A. SmithEngineering Education – Purdue UniversityCivil Engineering - University of Minnesota

[email protected] - http://www.ce.umn.edu/~smith/

Michigan State UniversityCollege of Natural Science Workshop

September 2009

Page 2: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

Teamwork Skills

•Communication• Listening and Persuading

•Decision Making•Conflict Management•Leadership•Trust and Loyalty

Page 3: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

Objective

Deterministic Stochastic

Multiple Ranking

AHP

SMART

MAUT

Single B/C

LP

Optimization

Decision Tree (EV)

Simulation

Decision-Making Approaches

Page 4: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

Team Decision Making – Ranking Tasks

• Typically “survival” tasks– First was Moon Survival, “Lost on the moon”

developed by Jay Hall for NASA in 1967– Many survival tasks available – desert

survival, lost at sea, winter survival, …

• Individual followed by team ranking

• Different decision-making conditions in each team

Page 5: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

5

Team Member Roles

• Observer/ Process Recorder

• Task Recorder

• Skeptic/Prober

Page 6: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

6

ActionName 1 Name 2 Name 3 Name 4 Total

Contributes Ideas

DescribesFeelings

EncouragesParticipation

Summarizes, Integrates

Checks forUnderstanding

Relates New To Old Learning

Gives Direction To Work

Total

Page 7: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

Postdecision Questionaire

1. How understood and listened to did you feel in your group?Not at all 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9 Completely

2. How much influence do you feel you had in your group’s decision making?None 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9 A great deal

3. How committed do you feel to the decision your group made?None 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9 A great deal

4. How much responsibility do you feel for making the decision work?None 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9 A great deal

5. How satisfied do you feel with the amount and quality of your participation in your group’s decision makingDissatisfied 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9 Satisfied

6. Write one adjective that describes the atmosphere in your group during the decision making

Page 8: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

Team Decision-Making Process

• How– Individual– Mathematical– Consensus– Iterative – H, M, L– Both ends toward the

middle

• Assumptions/Biases– Family/Friends– News– Youth– Geographic location

Page 9: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

Methods of Decision Making (Johnson & Johnson, 1991)

1. Decision by authority without discussion2. Expert member3. Average of member’s opinions4. Decision by authority after discussion5. Majority control6. Minority control7. Consensus

See Table Summarizing Characteristics – Smith (2007), p. 46

Page 10: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, F.P. 1991. Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Prentice-Hall

Page 11: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

Choice of Decision-Making Method Depends On:

1. The type of decision to be made.2. The amount of time and resources

available.3. The history of the group.4. The nature of the task being worked on5. The kind of climate the groups wishes to

establish6. The type of setting in which the group is

working

Johnson & Johnson, 1991

Page 12: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

Characteristics of Effective Decisions:

1. The resources of the group members are well used.

2. Time is well used.3. The decision is correct, or of high quality.4. The decision is put into effect fully by all

the necessary members' commitment.5. The problem-solving ability of the group

is enhanced.

Johnson & Johnson, 1991

Page 13: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

Two Approaches to Decision MakingGarvin & Roberto, 2001. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 108-116.

Advocacy Inquiry

Concept of decision making

A contest Collaborative problem solving

Purpose of discussion Persuasion and lobbying Testing and evaluation

Participants’ role Spokespeople Critical thinkers

Pattern of behavior Strive to persuade others

Defend your position

Downplay weaknesses

Present balanced arguments

Remain open to alternatives

Accept constructive criticism

Minority views Discouraged or dismissed

Cultivated and valued

Outcome Winners and losers Collective ownership

Page 14: Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.

A Litmus Test (Gavin & Roberto)

•Multiple Alternatives•Assumption Testing•Well-defined Criteria•Dissent and Debate•Perceived FairnessGavin, David A. and Roberto, Michael A. 2001. What you don’t know about making decisions. Harvard Business Review, 79 (8), 108-116.


Recommended