B U I L D I N GE D U C AT I O N A L
S U C C E S ST H R O U G H
COLLABORAT ION IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Engaging Parents as Partners in Creating College Going Cultures Conference:
Evaluation Report
Engaging Parents as Partners in Creating College Going Cultures Conference:
Evaluation ReportApril 26, 2007
Melissa Friedman MacDonald and Aimée Dorr, UCLA
201726_Evalu CVR.indd 1 7/11/07 8:57:54 AM
�
Engaging Parents as Partners in Creating College Going Cultures Conference:
Evaluation ReportApril 26, 2007
Melissa Friedman MacDonald and Aimée Dorr, UCLA
The Conference
Co-hosted by UCLA and the Los Angles County Office of Education (LACOE), the “Engaging
Parents as Partners in Creating College Going Cultures” conference is the fourth event
sponsored by the BEST Collaboration in LA County initiative. The conference featured several
activities designed to address the following four goals:
1. Participants gain information about how to carry out effective parent programs
geared toward involving parents in the college process.
2. Participants become aware of existing parent programs (related to college
preparation) and resources that can be of use to them.
3. Participants develop at least two action oriented goals with respect to college-
minded parent programs.
4. Participants identify at least two other participants to continue consulting,
working with, and learning from.
Representatives from the USC Rossier School of Education and the Los Angeles Unified School
District, Local District 7 (LAUSD 7) also assisted with planning the conference. Teams representing
four school districts, five institutions of higher education (IHEs), and LACOE began the day with
an interactive poster session. Each partnership team presented at least one poster that included
information about an existing parent program. One or more team representatives stayed with the
poster while the remainder of conference participants were free to roam the gallery, review posters,
and engage in dialogue with presenters.
201726_Evalu.indd 1 7/11/07 6:04:16 PM
�
Immediately following the poster session, participants listened to a one-hour panel presentation by three
parents who have participated in different parent programs across Los Angeles County and who have at least
one student in college. The purpose was to provide the audience with practical advice about the types of things
that make a parent involvement program work well. Parent panelists addressed the following five questions
in their presentations: (1) What initially got you involved in your student’s college going process? What kept
you involved? (2) What types of activities were particularly useful for engaging you and your family in your
child’s college going process? Why and in what ways? (3) Which existing activities might be improved in the
future? In what ways? (4) Are there activities that were not part of your experience that you think would be
effective in engaging parents as partners in creating college going cultures? Please describe these activities and
any suggestions for implementation, and (5) Were there any activities that you felt were not productive? If so,
what were they? In what ways might they be revised or replaced? Parent panelists included Mary Johnson from
the UCLA Parent Curriculum Project, Guadalupe Torres from the USC Neighborhood Academic Initiative, and
Donna Robertson from the College Bound Program at Loyola Marymount University. The panel discussion
was moderated by Dr. Patricia McDonough, expert in college access and Professor of Education at UCLA’s
Graduate School of Education and Information Studies.
This panel presentation and the subsequent question and answer period set the stage for two sets of small
group discussions. Initial job alike sessions provided an opportunity for administrators, teachers, counselors,
university representatives, parents, and parent liaisons to discuss existing parent program models and strategies
for improving current efforts. A second round of small group discussions brought partnership teams together for
group planning and the development of tangible action steps related to creating and/or expanding upon parent
involvement programs. A closing discussion brought the large group together in order to review each team’s
action plans. In addition to interactive activities, printed resources (e.g., clearinghouse of existing LA County
parent programs) were also prepared and distributed in order to meet conference goals.
Conference Participants
In addition to representatives from ARCHES and the Irvine Foundation, five successful partnerships of
school districts and institutions of higher education from across LA County participated in this conference.
The goal was for each partnership to have a team representing at a minimum the district superintendent, a
high school principal, a teacher from that school, a counselor from that school, a parent from that school,
a parent liaison from that school, and a representative from a participating institution of higher education.
Invitations were extended to all individuals who participated in the previous conference held in November
2006. District superintendents and districts were asked to compose their own teams. LACOE Superintendent
201726_Evalu.indd 2 7/11/07 6:04:16 PM
�
Robles reimbursed schools for two substitute days for each participating classroom teacher. The following list
represents the participating school districts and their partner universities.
• Antelope Valley Union High School District, Antelope Valley College, California State University,
Bakersfield, and University of California, Los Angeles
• Burbank Unified School District and University of Southern California
• Long Beach Unified School District, California State University, Long Beach, and Long Beach City College
• Los Angeles Unified School District, Local District 7, and University of California, Los Angeles
• Los Angeles Unified School District, Local District 7, and University of Southern California
Of the 88 participants, 50 (57%) completed a written assessment that provided information about what
they learned from the conference, their general perceptions of the event, and next steps. Twenty-seven
respondents were directly associated with public schools (2 superintendents, 4 district administrators, 4 school
administrators, 3 teachers, 8 counselors, 6 parents, 1 student), and nine were associated with institutions of
higher education. Fourteen people identified themselves as falling into the “other” category which included
LACOE administrators and various program and activity directors at the high school level.
Reactions to the Conference
In general, participants were satisfied with the conference and felt that it met their personal needs. In fact, 91 %
(N=43) of respondents rated the usefulness of the event’s content and activities to be either “more than some” or
“a lot” (see Figure 1).
Figure 1. Number of conference participants selecting each of the five rating points for
the value of the conference for their work (47 respondents).
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Not at all A little Some More than
Some
A lot
Overall Usefulness of Conference for Personal Needs
Fre
qu
ency
Usefulness of the Poster Session For Identifying Best Practices
Fre
qu
ency
Usefulness of the Parent Panel for Identifying Best Practices
Fre
qu
ency
Usefulness of the Job Alike Discussion for Identifying Best Practices
Fre
qu
ency
201726_Evalu.indd 3 7/11/07 6:04:16 PM
�
In addition to commenting on the overall benefit of the event, participants provided feedback on the usefulness
of each conference activity (i.e., poster session, parent panel, job alike discussion) for identifying best practices
related to engaging parents as partners in creating college going cultures. Although all three activities were
received favorably, respondents indicated that the parent panel and job alike discussions were particularly useful
for identifying such best practices (see Figures 2-4).
Figure 2. Number of conference participants selecting each of the five rating points
for the value of the poster session for identifying best practices related to engaging
parents as partners in creating college going cultures (45 respondents).
Figure 3. Number of conference participants selecting each of the five rating points
for the value of the parent panel for identifying best practices related to engaging
parents as partners in creating college going cultures (46 respondents).
Overall Usefulness of Conference for Personal Needs
Fre
qu
ency
0
5
1015
20
25
30
Not at all A little Some More thanSome
A lot
Usefulness of the Poster Session For Identifying Best Practices
Fre
qu
ency
Usefulness of the Parent Panel for Identifying Best Practices
Fre
qu
ency
Usefulness of the Job Alike Discussion for Identifying Best Practices
Fre
qu
ency
Overall Usefulness of Conference for Personal Needs
Fre
qu
ency
Usefulness of the Poster Session For Identifying Best Practices
Fre
qu
ency
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Not at all A little Some More than
Some
A lot
Usefulness of the Parent Panel for Identifying Best Practices
Fre
qu
ency
Usefulness of the Job Alike Discussion for Identifying Best Practices
Fre
qu
ency
201726_Evalu.indd 4 7/11/07 6:04:17 PM
�
Figure 4. Number of conference participants selecting each of the five rating points for
the value of the job alike discussion for identifying best practices related to engaging
parents as partners in creating college going cultures (47 respondents).
Learning from the Conference
As a whole, the conference proved to be a valuable learning experience. The vast majority of participants (98%)
reported learning at least one best practice related to engaging parents in creating college going cultures that
they might consider implementing in their partnerships. Most respondents (90%, N=45) indicated learning two
best practices.
The reported learning outcomes fell into six thematic categories (see Figure 5). The majority of respondents
reported learning outcomes related to creating parent networks (based on the notion that parents listen most to
other parents) and developing programs to train parents as leaders and workshop facilitators. The next most
salient learning category was the improvement and/or development of parent centers at the school site. Many
participants indicated learning the importance of and strategies for transforming parent centers from social
spaces into academic environments focusing on the college process.
Smaller numbers of participants reported learning more about how to increase parental access to institutions
of higher education (IHEs). Responses in this category included planning conferences, workshops, and tours
for parents on an IHE campus. A roughly equal number of participants described learning strategies for how
to create college materials in language that is accessible to parents. The “Other” category contained a wide
range of responses that consisted mostly of comments about the general importance of listening to parents and
educating them about the college process.
Overall Usefulness of Conference for Personal Needs
Fre
qu
ency
Usefulness of the Poster Session For Identifying Best Practices
Fre
qu
ency
Usefulness of the Parent Panel for Identifying Best Practices
Fre
qu
ency
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Not at all A little Some More than
Some
A lot
Usefulness of the Job Alike Discussion for Identifying Best Practices
Fre
qu
ency
201726_Evalu.indd 5 7/11/07 6:04:18 PM
�
Figure 5. Number of conference participants reporting learning outcomes in any of six
thematic categories (49 respondents).
A resource guide that listed existing parent programs in LA County was prepared and distributed at the event
and when asked to report any additional parent programs not mentioned at the conference, only 12% (N=6)
reported other parent programs. Other respondents commented on the knowledge gained about existing program
models (via conference activities such as the poster session) and the usefulness of the parent program resource
guide provided in the conference folder.
Plans for Continued Contact and Future Collaboration
A primary goal of this conference was to promote continued contact with colleagues met at the event and future
collaboration. In general, the event was very successful in meeting these objectives. In fact, 98% of respondents
indicated plans to continue contact with colleagues from the conference. Plans for sustained collaboration
included scheduling regular meetings with colleagues, staying in touch via email/phone, collaborating to
sponsor a parent event, sharing resources, and developing new partnership activities related to increasing parent
involvement.
In addition to reporting best practices related to engaging parents as partners in creating college going cultures,
82% (N=41) of respondents identified next steps for implementing their reported learning outcomes. Such
plans for implementation fell into five thematic categories (see Figure 6). The most commonly mentioned next
step included leveraging currently involved parents to establish a wider parent network. Similar numbers of
respondents also described next steps related to the creation of parent programs geared toward training parents
as leaders and workshop facilitators.
05
10152025
Learning Outcomes by Thematic Category
Fre
qu
ency
Oth
er
Par
ent
Net
wor
ks
Par
ent
Lead
ersh
ipT
rain
ing
Impr
ove/
deve
lop
Par
ent C
ente
rs
Par
ent A
cces
sto
IHE
s
Col
lege
Mat
eria
l in
Acc
essi
ble
Lang
uage
Thematic Categories for Implementation Steps
Fre
qu
ency
Oth
er
Est
ablis
hing
aP
aren
t Net
wor
k
Dev
elop
ing
Par
ent
Lead
ersh
ipP
rogr
ams
Impr
ovin
g/de
velo
ping
Par
ent C
ente
rs
Reg
ular
Sch
ool
Sta
ff M
eetin
gs
Thematic Categories for Groups With Whom to Share Conference InformationO
ther
Sch
ool/D
istr
ict
Adm
inis
trat
ors
Par
ents
Teac
hers
IHE
Adm
inis
trat
ors
Cou
nsel
ors
Stu
dent
Gro
ups
Col
lege
Pre
para
tory
Pro
gram
s
Fre
qu
ency
Fre
qu
ency
Thematic Categories for Type of Action Step Commitment
Create NewParent
Programs
OtherContactParents/Build
Parent Network
Plan a FamilyDay at IHE
Adapt ExistingParent
Programs
201726_Evalu.indd 6 7/11/07 6:04:18 PM
�
A smaller group of respondents reported next steps focused on the development/improvement of parent centers
and holding regular staff meetings. The “Other” category consisted of a broad spectrum of responses and any
potential subcategories contained two items at most. Examples of responses coded as “other” include sending
monthly newsletters to parents, creating specialized committees for parental involvement programs, and
working with the local district parent ombudsperson to operationalize best practices. Many “other” responses
consisted of general comments about the significance of continued efforts to engage parents.
Figure 6. Number of conference participants reporting implementation
steps in any of five thematic categories (41 respondents).
In addition to identifying tangible implementation steps, 90% (N=45) of respondents provided specific
information about at least one group (some provided up to three groups) with whom they planned to share
the information learned at the conference. Responses fell into eight thematic categories (see Figure 7). The
majority of respondents indicated plans to share learning outcomes with school and/or district administrators.
Roughly equal numbers of respondents reported plans to share conference information with parents, teachers,
IHE administrators, and counselors. Smaller numbers of respondents indicated an intention to share information
with student groups and other college preparatory programs (e.g., AVID, College Bound). The “Other” category
contained a wide spectrum of responses that included specific groups, consortiums, or councils.
Learning Outcomes by Thematic Category
Fre
qu
ency
Oth
er
Par
ent
Net
wor
ks
Par
ent
Lead
ersh
ipT
rain
ing
Impr
ove/
deve
lop
Par
ent C
ente
rs
Par
ent A
cces
sto
IHE
s
Col
lege
Mat
eria
l in
Acc
essi
ble
Lang
uage
0
5
10
15
20
Thematic Categories for Implementation Steps
Fre
qu
ency
Oth
er
Est
ablis
hing
aP
aren
t Net
wor
k
Dev
elop
ing
Par
ent
Lead
ersh
ipP
rogr
ams
Impr
ovin
g/de
velo
ping
Par
ent C
ente
rs
Reg
ular
Sch
ool
Sta
ff M
eetin
gs
Thematic Categories for Groups With Whom to Share Conference Information
Oth
er
Sch
ool/D
istr
ict
Adm
inis
trat
ors
Par
ents
Teac
hers
IHE
Adm
inis
trat
ors
Cou
nsel
ors
Stu
dent
Gro
ups
Col
lege
Pre
para
tory
Pro
gram
s
Fre
qu
ency
Fre
qu
ency
Thematic Categories for Type of Action Step Commitment
Create NewParent
Programs
OtherContactParents/Build
Parent Network
Plan a FamilyDay at IHE
Adapt ExistingParent
Programs
201726_Evalu.indd 7 7/11/07 6:04:18 PM
�
Figure 7. Number of conference participants reporting groups of people with whom to share
conference information in any of eight thematic categories (45 respondents).
Plans for Future Action
A primary goal of the small group team discussions was the development of an action plan. Partnership teams
were asked to apply lessons learned from the poster session, parent panel presentation, and the job alike
discussions toward creating tangible action steps for their own work. A large number of respondents (84%)
reported they would take responsibility for a given action step.
Out of this 84% (N=42), many respondents (72%, N=36) provided specific information about the type of
action step commitment made. The types of action step commitments fell into five thematic categories (see
Figure 8). The majority of respondents reported taking responsibility for an action step related to creating new
parent programs (e.g., workshops, parent centers). The next most salient type of action step commitment was
related to contacting parents and developing plans to build a solid parent network. Roughly equal, smaller
numbers of respondents reported a commitment to planning a family day at an IHE and developing a means
of adapting existing parent programs to fit the needs of their school site. The “Other” category consisted of
a broad spectrum of responses and any potential subcategories contained two items at most. Examples of
responses coded as “other” include planning regular team meetings, creating a dedicated committee for parent
involvement issues/programs, and continuing to build upon existing partnerships.
Learning Outcomes by Thematic Category
Fre
qu
ency
Oth
er
Par
ent
Net
wor
ks
Par
ent
Lead
ersh
ipT
rain
ing
Impr
ove/
deve
lop
Par
ent C
ente
rs
Par
ent A
cces
sto
IHE
s
Col
lege
Mat
eria
l in
Acc
essi
ble
Lang
uage
Thematic Categories for Implementation Steps
Fre
qu
ency
Oth
er
Est
ablis
hing
aP
aren
t Net
wor
k
Dev
elop
ing
Par
ent
Lead
ersh
ipP
rogr
ams
Impr
ovin
g/de
velo
ping
Par
ent C
ente
rs
Reg
ular
Sch
ool
Sta
ff M
eetin
gs
0
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 5
3 0
Thematic Categories for Groups With Whom to Share Conference Information
Oth
er
Sch
ool/D
istr
ict
Adm
inis
trat
ors
Par
ents
Teac
hers
IHE
Adm
inis
trat
ors
Cou
nsel
ors
Stu
dent
Gro
ups
Col
lege
Pre
para
tory
Pro
gram
s
Fre
qu
ency
Fre
qu
ency
Thematic Categories for Type of Action Step Commitment
Create NewParent
Programs
OtherContactParents/Build
Parent Network
Plan a FamilyDay at IHE
Adapt ExistingParent
Programs
201726_Evalu.indd 8 7/11/07 6:04:19 PM
�
Figure 8. Number of conference participants reporting action step commitments
in any of five thematic categories (36 respondents).
Action Plans by Partnership
In addition to each respondent indicating what type of action step he/she committed to on an individual level,
partnership teams created action plans and took collective responsibility for implementing certain action items.
In general, the action plans contained information about conceptual learning outcomes to be applied at the
school site (e.g., parents listen to other parents), listed current challenges, identified specific program areas that
need revision, and documented ideas for the development of new programs and infrastructures. The majority
of the action steps were related to creating a parent curriculum or training program, developing a specialized
parent involvement committee, planning regular meetings to address parent engagement, establishing a parent
network, and transforming parent centers from social spaces into academic, college-preparatory centers.
The actual action steps developed by partnership teams are listed in the appendix. All action plans are presented
as written by the team during the conference (see Appendices A-F).
Learning Outcomes by Thematic Category
Fre
qu
ency
Oth
er
Par
ent
Net
wor
ks
Par
ent
Lead
ersh
ipT
rain
ing
Impr
ove/
deve
lop
Par
ent C
ente
rs
Par
ent A
cces
sto
IHE
s
Col
lege
Mat
eria
l in
Acc
essi
ble
Lang
uage
Thematic Categories for Implementation Steps
Fre
qu
ency
Oth
er
Est
ablis
hing
aP
aren
t Net
wor
k
Dev
elop
ing
Par
ent
Lead
ersh
ipP
rogr
ams
Impr
ovin
g/de
velo
ping
Par
ent C
ente
rs
Reg
ular
Sch
ool
Sta
ff M
eetin
gs
Thematic Categories for Groups With Whom to Share Conference Information
Oth
er
Sch
ool/D
istr
ict
Adm
inis
trat
ors
Par
ents
Teac
hers
IHE
Adm
inis
trat
ors
Cou
nsel
ors
Stu
dent
Gro
ups
Col
lege
Pre
para
tory
Pro
gram
s
Fre
qu
ency
0
2
4
6
8
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
Fre
qu
ency
Thematic Categories for Type of Action Step Commitment
Create NewParent
Programs
OtherContactParents/Build
Parent Network
Plan a FamilyDay at IHE
Adapt ExistingParent
Programs
201726_Evalu.indd 9 7/11/07 6:04:19 PM
�0
Suggestions for Future Conferences
About half (54 %, N=27) of the respondents provided feedback regarding topics and suggested improvements
for future conferences. However, there was such wide range of responses that only one significant category
(consisting of more than two responses) emerged. Eleven participants provided responses in this category which
was to follow up with and continue the parent engagement theme. Only 42% (N=21) of respondents made
suggestions about how to improve future conferences. Similar to the feedback on future topics, there was a wide
range of suggestions for future improvements. The only salient category, which consisted of more than two
responses, was that the event was great as it was. Examples of the remaining responses which were coded as
“other” include providing separate break out rooms for small group discussions, involving students, and inviting
potential funders.
Next Steps for BEST Collaboration in LA County
The purpose of the BEST Collaboration in LA County initiative is to develop a regional partnership of district-
IHE partnerships focused on improving educational opportunity, academic performance, and college going for
all students throughout the county. The fourth in a series of conferences sponsored by the BEST Collaboration
in LA County initiative, the April 26th event was well-received by participants and 84% of respondents
indicated that they would be interested in attending future conferences. The evaluation makes it clear that
participants learned from the conference, met colleagues with whom they will continue contact, and developed
action plans that look feasible, related to conference content, and worthwhile. Next steps for this initiative
include a continued effort to solidify the regional network and moving forward with the planning of the next
conference to be held in fall 2007.
Solidifying the Regional Network
An important effort for this initiative is to solidify membership in the regional network. The BEST
Collaboration in LA County initiative seeks to provide a meaningful forum for LA County educators to share
practical strategies, collectively problem-solve common challenges, and develop action plans for improving
upon existing partnership work. For this reason, it is desirable to have a certain level of continuity in network
participation. All seven partnerships who attended the November 2006 event were invited to participate in the
April 26th conference and five teams did so. For this reason, retention will be a central concern in planning the
fall 2007 conference and the steering committee will revisit the recruitment strategy so as to maximize event
attendance by all members of the network. Another important consideration for the steering committee will be
201726_Evalu.indd 10 7/11/07 6:04:19 PM
��
how to encourage the continuation of conference-inspired work and the implementation of action plans between
events. One possibility to be explored includes maintaining continuity in the meeting theme across conferences.
Providing Meaningful Resources and Activities
Providing resources and sponsoring relevant learning opportunities for LA County educators are central
objectives of the BEST Collaboration in LA County initiative. Thus far, the initiative has hosted four
conferences and has released six reports documenting the work of these events. All publications are available to
download online at http://apep-bestla.gseis.ucla.edu/. The BEST Collaboration in LA County initiative intends
to continue this line of work and is currently in the process of planning a fifth conference to be held in fall 2007.
The sponsors and topic for this event are still being determined. A likely focus for the upcoming conference will
be a continuation of the parental involvement theme with an emphasis on the development of effective parent
centers.
201726_Evalu.indd 11 7/11/07 6:04:19 PM
12
Appendix A
Antelope Valley Union High School District, Antelope Valley College, California State University, Bakersfield, and University of California, Los Angeles
• For increased buy-in with participating parents, invite parents who have previously been helped and feel the program has been successful.
• Select one focus event that has been successful and unite/partner to provide information.• Target ninth grade students for focused collaborative approach.• Time frame- see quarter grade in October.• Success would be defined as ______________________.• Provide education workshops to parents.• Provide incentive (tickets, etc.) to increase participation.• Target population = 700 students (freshman population).• Make student event fun, social, with food, and educational with parent workshop.• Promote activity by (marketing and branding).• Start with 8th grade to start building interest and developing college going culture.• Determine other incentives to attract families and students.• Keep in mind families have serious time constraints!
201726_Evalu_R1.indd 12 7/16/07 1:32:42 PM
��
Appendix B
Burbank Unified School District and University of Southern California
• Various vehicles of communication to parents regarding college information.• Support for students (college prep.) who do not get into college of choice and those who fail a college
prep class in high school.• More ways to get students to know what their four year plan is.• Research the concept of “peer advisor”.• Parent Welcome Center: provide college information.• Teach students how to write resumes, brag letter, college applications (9th grade health and careers).• Refine and expand preliminary steps: College Culture.• Train people and call colleges regarding financial aid.• More students need to be connected with career center.• What is the best way to get parents out of the house and to the school to get info?
201726_Evalu.indd 13 7/11/07 6:04:19 PM
��
Appendix C
Long Beach Unified School District, California State University, Long Beach, and Long Beach City College
1. Createmenuofactivitieswithschedule• Action item: College Bound activities on campus/in the community.• Create/Action item: Family Days at LBCC, CSULB.• To do: High school staff must know what CSULB offers/requirements.• Create/Schedule: High school-College specific family day, childcare that is also college prep, food,
transportation.• Start with a cohort of families; communicate success and recruitment of other families.
2. ParentLeadershipProgram• Action item: develop curriculum for parents.
§“What they need to know”§History of education§A-G requirements§Planning for post-secondary§Navigating High School§Look at College Bound program structure/curriculum
3. LookatCollegeBoundprogramstructure/curriculum• Action item: Create a College Bound structure at all high schools with ongoing scaffolding, unfolding
curriculum that will result in parents knowing their role and having the parenting courage to play it.§Scaffolding and unfolding curriculum that meets the needs of a diversity of parent-learners.§Work with a small group of families.§Survey CSULB parents on how their student made it through high school and to CSULB.§CSULB needs to talk directly to the parents.
4. Developavisionofparentinvolvement• This group is developing a vision of parent involvement that is consistent across all high schools
but relevant to diverse parents. Diversity means, in this case, a variety of education histories and experiences. Program begins with the development of curriculum-what parents should know and be able to do to assist child/student with preparation for college. Parent leadership program to develop an ongoing sustainable program. CLMER curriculum. Look at existing CSULB compendium of successful outreach programs to identify best practices.
• Action item: reach parents, teachers, administrators in middle and elementary schools regarding “What is A-G and how does early preparation assist with going to college”.
• Action item: Courses taught on CSULB campuses for Renaissance students (check with college of the arts).• Goal: All PreK-20 parents (or guardian) in the greater Long Beach Community will effectively navigate
A-G, the high school experience, and post-secondary opportunities with their student(s).
201726_Evalu.indd 14 7/11/07 6:04:19 PM
��
Appendix D
Los Angeles County Office of Education (LACOE)
ActionStepstoIncreaseOutreach:• Analysis of what districts have in place and what LACOE has in place.• Cross-divisional group to identify what Parent Involvement (PI) services we offer. Need to develop
catalogue of services.• Reinforce the customer service values.• Partnering with the community *content specialists.• Develop a common mission among units for PI.• Agency wide-develop talking points regarding PI (our beliefs).• Compile information regarding research in the PI field.• Parent Involvement, Open House.• Conduct internal quarterly meetings to gather research.
Response:• Nacho: begin meeting process by June 30.• Notice to go out to units requesting information by May 30.
Progress:• Team is here…we are starting.
OutcomesPIPLC:• I.D. LACOE units doing PI and are involved.• Develop mission and vision (LACOE PI).• Develop short-term goals and long-term goals.• Define our role in supporting the community and schools.
201726_Evalu.indd 15 7/11/07 6:04:20 PM
��
Appendix E
Los Angeles Unified School District, Local District 7, and University of California, Los Angeles
WhatWeLearned:• Parents need to be welcomed.• Offer child care for parents/family meetings.• Building the parent center (transforming it from a social center to a resource center).• Parents being involved in school leadership.• We need to get the parents college minded to get the kids college ready.• Parent-teacher time is often punitive.• Parent outreach efforts have to be more cohesive (maximizing resources).• We need to continue to network with other schools to find out what works/does not work.• Teachers replicating lessons for parents.• Articulation between middle school and high school students to get them ready for high school.• Establish enduring principles for college readiness programs and parent centers.
Whatareourchallenges?• Sustainability of parents.• Translation (language barriers).• Getting the parents to focus on the primary goal: academics.• Parents are not familiar with the campus (they need a tour of the school).
WhatElseWeLearned:• We need to redefine the role of the parent center to be more of a resource center focused on academics.• We need to utilize the parent newsletter for outreach efforts.• Reaching out to the community organizations/churches.• Implementing the UCLA program that existed before to train the parents.• The way we work must be authentic and meaningful.• Parents should outreach to other parents.• Parents as partners (include parents in the classroom instruction).• Ongoing conversations.
ActionPlan:• Create an internal structure for parental involvement.• Monthly meetings.• Establish guiding principles.• Focusing on parent centers to be more cohesive around a vision.
201726_Evalu.indd 16 7/11/07 6:04:20 PM
��
Appendix F
Los Angeles Unified School District, Local District 7, and University of Southern California
ActionStepsForSupportForCollegeGoingCulture
Idea: Networking with parents from other T1 schools to share concerns and resources. Information mechanism (where parents are).
• School site council• Parent Center• CEAC• ELAC• DAC (central level)• Community Coalition
ActionStep:• Research available resources for college-going students.• Utilize existing rosters of parents to disseminate the information in a timely manner.• Communicate with other schools through “College Pathways” Newsletter (Spanish and English), send
by email or school mail.
Who?• Create a formalized College/Career Student, Parent, Community Think Tank.§APSCS§AP. RLA§College Advisor, Career Advisor§Parent Community Rep§Student Representative(s)§Parent Liaison (between H.S. and college)§Teachers§Partner Reps
1. Identify concerns locally regarding college access (data gathered from W.A.S.C. process).2. Develop protocols and processes for the “College Pathways” Newsletter.3. College Information updated on website.
201726_Evalu.indd 17 7/11/07 6:04:20 PM
��
Acknowledgments
The “Engaging Parents as Partners in Creating College Going Cultures” conference would not have been
possible without the contributions of many people including the participants, parent presenters, and the steering
committee. A team from UCLA’s Graduate School of Education and Information Studies and Center X and a
team from the Los Angeles County Office of Education (LACOE) played key leadership roles in planning and
implementing the event. Instrumental support was also provided by other members of the steering committee,
including Los Angeles Unified School District, Local District 7 Superintendent Carol Truscott, Los Angeles
Unified School District, Local District 7 Small Learning Community Coordinator Lynn Snyder, USC Rossier
School of Education Dean Karen Simms Gallagher, USC Rossier School of Education Director of Masters
Programs and Research Associate, Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis Kristan Venegas, LACOE
parent specialist Ignacio Robles, UCLA Center X parent expert Laila Hasan, and USC Neighborhood Academic
Initiative Director Kim Thomas Barrios. A team of volunteers from UCLA’s Center X provided essential
administrative support at the conference. Special thanks to all partnership teams who provided posters and to the
parent panelists, Mary Johnson, Donna Robertson, and Guadalupe Torres, for delivering excellent presentations.
In addition, we would like to recognize Dr. Patricia McDonough for moderating the panel. Thank you also to
Matt Keleman from the Irvine Foundation for attending the conference and providing important information
about funding opportunities for parent programs. We would also like to acknowledge ARCHES for sharing
information about their upcoming June 2007 conference on Building Parent Involvement. Financial and in-kind
support for the conference was provided by LACOE and UCLA.
201726_Evalu.indd 18 7/11/07 6:04:20 PM
��
201726_Evalu.indd 19 7/11/07 6:04:20 PM
�0
201726_Evalu.indd 20 7/11/07 6:04:20 PM