+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Building our understanding of progressive cancer using ... · Building our understanding of...

Building our understanding of progressive cancer using ... · Building our understanding of...

Date post: 13-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
national cancer intelligence network Building our understanding of progressive cancer using roune naonal datasets Authors L Irvine[1]; H McConnell[2] [1] Macmillan-NCIN Senior Data Fellow, NCIN, [2] Macmillan Cancer Support Background Historically there has been limited naonal informaon on progressive cancers (recurrence, second cancers and metastac disease), as data on these have not been rounely collected. As part of a joint programme, Macmillan and NCIN are using paent-level naonal cancer datasets to build our understanding of paerns of progressive cancer at a populaon level. In order to meet the needs of people living with cancer beyond their inial treatment and to facilitate mely re-introducon to the healthcare system we need to understand how many people have progressive cancers and their touch points on the health system. This will inform the services we develop to meet their needs and allow health professionals to spot triggers which could indicate progressive cancer. Conclusions Used in isolaon current naonal data sources do not provide us with enough evidence to understand progressive cancers. We aim to idenfy proxy triggers to classify progressive cancers using linked naonal roune datasets. We will validate these proxies against more detailed local data sources where available and seek to replicate analysis across the UK adjusng for known variaons between available sources where possible. Linking naonal data sources will provide a fuller picture of care pathways and help us idenfy paerns of cancer progression. Method The study assesses the quality of roune naonal datasets for analysing progressive cancer, and determines how these data can be used to develop a methodology to idenfy cancer progression. The project is in the early stages, but inial analysis will be complete later this year. There are a number of naonal datasets which, when linked, can inform our understanding of how cancers progress aſter the first diagnosis. These datasets will be used to idenfy acvity paerns in the paent pathways over me. These paerns along with clinical input will be used to idenfy trigger points which we will use to develop proxy algorithms to idenfy recurrence, second cancers and metastac cancers. The work will use paent level naonal datasets in the Naonal Cancer Data Repository (NCDR). Inial analysis will be for England using data that are currently available, including cancer registraons data, hospital acvity data (HES), cancer waing mes and radiotherapy (Radiotherapy Dataset – RTDS). We then plan to incorporate other datasets into the analysis, when they become available, including Diagnoscs Imaging Datasets, Chemotherapy and Primary care. We will focus our inial analysis on four cancer types. Throughout we will seek clinical advice on the approach for analysis and interpretaon of findings. We will discuss and compare our work with other progressive cancers related analysis, which use local, trust level or specific data sources. For more informaon please contact Lucy Irvine, NCIN, [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: Building our understanding of progressive cancer using ... · Building our understanding of progressive cancer using routine national datasets Authors ... (HES), cancer waiting times

national cancerintelligence network

Building our understanding of progressive cancer using routine national datasetsAuthors L Irvine[1]; H McConnell[2][1] Macmillan-NCIN Senior Data Fellow, NCIN, [2] Macmillan Cancer Support

BackgroundHistorically there has been limited national information on progressive cancers (recurrence, second cancers and metastatic disease), as data on these have not been routinely collected. As part of a joint programme, Macmillan and NCIN are using patient-level national cancer datasets to build our understanding of patterns of progressive cancer at a population level. In order to meet the needs of people living with cancer beyond their initial treatment and to facilitate timely re-introduction to the healthcare system we need to understand how many people have progressive cancers and their touch points on the health system. This will inform the services we develop to meet their needs and allow health professionals to spot triggers which could indicate progressive cancer.

ConclusionsUsed in isolation current national data sources do not provide us with enough evidence to understand progressive cancers. We aim to identify proxy triggers to classify progressive cancers using linked national routine datasets. We will validate these proxies against more detailed local data sources where available and seek to replicate analysis across the UK adjusting for known variations between available sources where possible. Linking national data sources will provide a fuller picture of care pathways and help us identify patterns of cancer progression.

MethodThe study assesses the quality of routine national datasets for analysing progressive cancer, and determines how these data can be used to develop a methodology to identify cancer progression. The project is in the early stages, but initial analysis will be complete later this year.

There are a number of national datasets which, when linked, can inform our understanding of how cancers progress after the first diagnosis. These datasets will be used to identify activity patterns in the patient pathways over time. These patterns along with clinical input will be used to identify trigger points which we will use to develop proxy algorithms to identify recurrence, second cancers and metastatic cancers. The work will use patient level national datasets in the National Cancer Data Repository (NCDR). Initial analysis will be for England using data that are currently available, including cancer registrations data, hospital activity data (HES), cancer waiting times and radiotherapy (Radiotherapy Dataset – RTDS). We then plan to incorporate other datasets into the analysis, when they become available, including Diagnostics Imaging Datasets, Chemotherapy and Primary care.

We will focus our initial analysis on four cancer types. Throughout we will seek clinical advice on the approach for analysis and interpretation of findings. We will discuss and compare our work with other progressive cancers related analysis, which use local, trust level or specific data sources.

For more information please contact Lucy Irvine, NCIN, [email protected]

Recommended