+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Building Reconfigurable Base Stations v2m final - ti.com · HSUPA MIMO TxDiversity??? 3 3.2 3.5...

Building Reconfigurable Base Stations v2m final - ti.com · HSUPA MIMO TxDiversity??? 3 3.2 3.5...

Date post: 01-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: trannhi
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
46
Wireless Making Infrastructure Building Reconfigurable Base Stations Alan Gatherer CTO Wireless Infrastructure Texas Instruments
Transcript

WirelessMaking

Infrastructure

Building ReconfigurableBase Stations

Alan GathererCTO Wireless Infrastructure Texas Instruments

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureAgenda

Why we love reconfiguration

Degrees of reconfiguration

Where are we today?

Software Defined Radio

Reconfiguration architecture options

Summary

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureAgenda

Why we love reconfiguration

Degrees of reconfiguration

Where are we today?

Software Defined Radio

Reconfiguration architecture options

Summary

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureGSM Refuses to Die

Worldwide GSM subscribers. 8th November 2004

Source: “The Numbers Add Up with GSM and WCDMA”, http://www.3g.co.uk

GSM base stations showed over 16% and 13% growth respectively in 2003 and 2004By some accounts, the GSM transceiver shipments in these two years grew over 50% Shipping into both new deployments as well as existing base stations

Millions

120011001000900800700600500400300200100

0Analog CDMA GSM +

WCDMA

15

213

iDEN PDC US TDMA

18 60 105

1117

WirelessMaking

Infrastructure2G is Diehard. Is 3G Diehard II?

2G (GSM)

Frequency hoppingFrequency hopping

Channel reuseChannel reuse

GPRSGPRS

HARQ

SAICSAICEDGE ???

Vocoder improvementsVocoder improvements

22 2.52.5 2.952.95

3G (WCDMA)

HSDPAHSDPAHSUPAHSUPA MIMOMIMOTxDiversityTxDiversity

??????

33 3.23.2 3.53.5

“We’ll use ourGSM equipment ‘til it rusts….”

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureRush to Deploy

Many competing technologies

WCDMA, EVDO, 802.16, TD-SCDMA

WCDMA deployed much earlier in its development cycle than GSM

WCDMA / EV-DO continue to develop

Competition with each other in Japan

Competition with the promise of 802.16

WirelessMaking

Infrastructure

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Jun 97

Dec 97

Jun 98

Dec 98

Jun 99

Dec 99

Jun 00

Dec 00

Jun 01

Dec 01

Jun 02

Dec 02

Jun 03

Dec 03

Jun 04

Dec 04

Source: ETSI CR Database 11 Jan 2005

Non

-edi

toria

l CR

s

W-CDMA Total

GPRS Total

W-CDMA Test

Source: Agilent Technologies

Early GPRS deployment

Global GPRS

GPRS Subscriber Growth

Early R99 WCDMA deployment

WCDMA (R99) vs GPRS (R97) Change Requests / Qtr: June ’97 – Dec 04

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureNo Convergence in 3G

CDMA20001xEV-DV

TD-SCDMA

EDGE

Voice14.4 kbpsCSD & PD

Voice64 kbps Packet

High Capacity Voice153 kbps PacketRel. A-307 kbps

2.4 Mbps Packet >2.4 Mbps PacketHigher Cap Voice

Up to 384 kbps Packet

>2 Mbps PacketHigher Cap Voice

Higher Capacity Voice2 Mbps Packet

114 kbps PacketVoice9.6 kbps CSD

Voice9.6 kbps CSD

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

GSM: Global System for Mobile CommunicationsCDMA: Code Division Multiple AccessTDMA: Time Division Multiple AccessGPRS: General Packet Radio System

HSDPA: High Speed Downlink Packet AccessEDGE: Enhanced Data rates for GSM EvolutionEV: Evolution; DV: Data and Voice; DO: Data OptimizedW-CDMA: Wideband CDMA: General Packet Radio System

802.16??

cdmaOneIS-95-A

cdmaOneIS-95-B

CDMA20001X

CDMA20001xEV-DO

W-CDMAHSDPAW-CDMAGSM GPRS

TDMAIS-136

GSM

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureWe Like to Make Money!

NB: Need to watch:

PowerForm factor

Total CostFPGA

Total CostDSP

Total CostASIC

Fixed CostASIC

Fixed CostDSPFixed CostFPGA

Tota

l Cos

t(F

ixed

and

Var

iabl

e C

ost*

# of

Uni

ts U

nits

)

Volume (Units)

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureCaveats For Cost Per Unit

PowerContinues to be critical to base station designs. Base stations are often in enclosed spaces and experience wide temperature variations. These systems need to operate with high reliability for years Means some reconfigurable devices. Even some DSPs fail the basic power limit for a hot spotLow power efficiency of power amplifiers has forced the industry to focus on Power Amplifier (PA) efficiency and not flexibility

CostThere continues to be significant cost pressure on base station equipment. The cost of 3G systems is dropping rapidly. WCDMA has already fallen below GSM in cost per channel

ComplexityDevelopment time

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureCost

Good reconfigurable target Not so good (yet)

PA is consistentlythe high cost item, so focus in PA is cost reduction, notreconfiguration

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

2G old 2G today 3G today DBBAFEPA

WirelessMaking

Infrastructure

User1

User2

User3

User4

UserN

User1 User

2

User3

User4

Complexity: Data is Harder Than Voice

Voice modem resource scheduling

Data modem resource scheduling

Static for the life of the userSimilar across usersNo fragmentationDeterministic scheduling

Dynamic resource requirementWidely varying resourcesFragmentation possibleDynamic schedulingAdaptive modulation, HARQ

resource resource

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureDevelopment Time

Maximum Available Revenue

Maximum Revenue Due

to Delayed Entry

Ramp toProduction

Total MarketWindow

Rev

enue

Market Rise Market Fall

TimeDevelopmentBegins

Total Lost RevenueDue to

Delayed Entry

Time to Market

WirelessMaking

Infrastructure

ASICDesign Starts

Source: iSuppli 2Q04

ASIC Industry Design Starts Declining

1,200

1,300

1,400

1,500

1,600

1,700

1,800

1,900

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureFPGA Gaining in Wired/Industrial

0

1

6

Computer Wireless

2004Sales

$B

7

ASIC’03-’08 CAGR

PLD’03-’08 CAGR

4.7%

2

4

5

Wired

2.2%

Consumer

4.0%

15.8%

8.0%3

Auto Industrial

5.8%6.1%

Source: iSuppli 3Q04

11.1%

11.0%

13.6%

15.6%11.5%

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureCost of ASIC Affecting Design Starts

Example: Saving 25% of Unit Cost with ASIC

Uni

ts S

hipp

ed to

Pay

back

Inve

stm

ent

Unit Cost of ASIC

Investment$15M$10M$ 5M

10KU

100KU

1,000KU

10,000KU

$10 $100 $1,000

WirelessComputerConsumer

WiredTelecom

WiredDatacom

Wired Access/Basestation

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureAgenda

Why we love reconfiguration

Degrees of reconfiguration

Where are we today?

Software Defined Radio

Reconfiguration architecture options

Summary

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureWhat is Reconfigurable?

Commonelements

MOST

LEAST

Common base station

Common modem cards

Common footprint

Common chassis

Common programming

platform

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureCommon Base Station

On-the-fly reconfiguration of base stationsStill very expensiveCarriers generally don’t need this level of flexibilitySome rural carriers see value when roaming as the dominant revenue sourceHoteling?

VanuUses off the shelf serversCost reduction for small quantities as off-the-shelf DSP cards tend to cost more (but wait for ATCA), even though DSPs tend to be cheaper and lower power per function

LyrtechDSP/FPGA board“Universal Base Station” system, using flexcell ™ and SignalMaster software-design radio (SDR) platformsmulti-band (AMPS, GSM, WCDMA, VHF and 802.11)

ACTProduced a generic DSP / FPGA board for multi-standard

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureCommon Base Station Issues

CostRF and AnalogCell planning for a reconfigurable network?

Cell planning and site acquisition is a major issueCell planning even occurs for WLAN in the enterprise

Backhaul network differences

IP?What about mobility

An idea whose time is yet to come

Frequency agile standards such as 802.22 might have some reconfigurable elements to them

Cos

t

Time (Years)

100%

75%

50%

25%

(As

% o

f ini

tial v

alue

)

100%

80%

40%

20%

60%

Rev

enue

(A

s %

of l

ast v

alue

)

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureCommon Modem Cards

Much more likely in the mid term

64 WCDMA may imply 72.6 GSM (I guessed)This isn’t a useful numberStill, if you have a new standard that isn’t shipping in volume……

Inventory savingsReduced NRE

Apples to oranges 1 lb apples to 1 kilo apples

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureCommon Footprint

A single board for multiple standards with a few missing components that define frequency range and bandwidth

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureCommon Chassis

Use the same rack and backplanee.g., CPRI, OBSAI, ATCA

Use the same controller cardsEspecially with a common network terminatione.g., OBSAI

Use the same power supply and clock distribution cards

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureOBSAI, CPRI, ATCA

OBSAI (open base station architecture initiative)Defines the whole base station mechanicals and electric interfaces, including the control and transport cards. Some software messaging is also defined

CPRI (common public radio interface)Focuses on the baseband to analog card interface

ATCA (Advanced Telecom Computing Architecture)Optimized for telecoms transportProbably too expensive for radio basebanduATCA may be more suitable for radioA great prototyping platform at least, using RapidIO as the backplane for scalability

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureCommon Platform

Make the modem look as similar as possible at the software level across different standards

Hardware abstraction

Common APIs

Reuse of common software blocks

Same software tooling allows engineers to move between projects

This is what SDR really is for wireless infrastructure!!

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureAgenda

Why we love reconfiguration

Degrees of reconfiguration

Where are we today?

Software Defined Radio

Reconfiguration architecture options

Summary

WirelessMaking

Infrastructure

Maybe software

Search

ControlDespread

DataDespread

Preamble Detect

MRCChannelest

PostProcess

PostProcess

MRC

SymbolRate

Processing

Example: WCDMA

MessagingResourceAllocation& Control

Needs some acceleration.Often ASIC

Software

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureDigital Baseband Trends

WCDMA is the most complex

CDMA chip rate generally needs some sort of acceleration

EDGE / GSM, TDSCDMA, 802.16 can be done in software

More data (and less voice) lead to more software-oriented solutions

Less chip rate processing, more symbol rate processing

HARQ and MAC functions now on the modem

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureDigital Up and Down Convert

Specialized DUC/DDC chips on the market that are parameterizable

Big OEMs may do their own ASIC

FPGAs also used

Predistortion and crest factor reduction are now being used, but focus is on cost –not reconfiguration

GC5016 or GC4116

OptionalCrest Factor Reduction &Digital PreDistortionProcessing

Analog Up Conversion

PAAnalogIF to RF

QQ

QQ Digital UpconverterChannel

BasebandGeneration

Formatting& Gain

RRC FilterInterpolation

NCO(Tuning

Freq) CFR &DPD

D/A

IF 2 GHz

2 GHz

Signal of Internet

Signal of Internet

IF

Signal of Internet

Q

Signal of Internet

Q

Analog Down Conversion

AnalogRF to IF A/D

GC5016 or GC4016

NCO(Tuning

Freq) Digital DownconverterChannel

Filtering &Decimation

Gain/AGC &Formatting

BasebandProcessing

Chip/SymbolProcessing

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureTrends From Analog to Digital

VCO are typically fixedSAWs are fixedZero IF to remove SAWs

Is used on TxRare in Rx for BTS due to stress on analog componentsBenefit: Carrier selection at BB

PA and LNA are fixed in center frequency and bandwidth

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureAgenda

Why we love reconfiguration

Degrees of reconfiguration

Where are we today?

Software Defined Radio

Reconfiguration architecture options

Summary

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureSDR vs Reconfigurable Base Station

Software defined doesn’t imply reconfigurableSDR is an object oriented philosophy of system design and may or may not imply reconfigurability:

Reduces NRE. Allows smooth migration to next platform and lower time to marketSDR gives hardware abstractionSDR allows software elements to be plug and playSDR enables reconfigurability in many cases

Reconfigurable implies the design takes account of multiple radio standards

SDRSDR

ReconfigurableReconfigurable

Want tobe hereWant tobe here

Here is Here is nice, toonice, too

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureThe CORBA Gatekeeper

Software “bus” controls all transactions

CORBA ORB &Services

(middleware)CF Services & Applications

Operating System

Network Stacks & Serial Interface Services

Board Support Package (Bus Layer)

CORBA ORB &Services

(middleware)CF Services & Applications

Operating System

Board Support Package (Bus Layer)

Core Framework IDL (“Logical Software Bus” via CORBA)

Modem Components

ModemAdapter

RF

Link, NetworkComponents

SecurityAdapter

Non-CORBAModem

Components

Physical API

SecurityComponents

SecurityAdapter

Link, NetworkComponents

I/OAdapter

I/OComponents

Non-CORBAI/O

Components

Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS)

Applications

Non-CORBASecurity

Components

Black Hardware Bus Red Hardware Bus

OE

MAC API LLC/Network API Security API LLC/Network API I/O API

Core Framework (CF)

WirelessMaking

Infrastructure

O

How the ORB Works

All components, whether software or hardware, have an Applications Programming Interface (API) that allows the “client” application to access them in a regular, object-oriented way via the “logical software bus”

In this manner the objects can be added and removed easilyAt the heart of this easy addition and subtraction is the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA).

Communication between objects is managed by the Object Request Broker (ORB)

ORB

C

Database of objectdescriptions

“O please”

“I need some O”

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureHow the ORB Works

The objects do not have to be aware of each other, only the ORB

In order to be recognized by the system, each object has a domain profile

The ORB, along with the core framework (CF) that defines the interfaces is a “middleware”

Middleware is common in base station modems today

But not usually this complex

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureAgenda

Why we love reconfiguration

Degrees of reconfiguration

Where are we today?

Software Defined Radio

Reconfiguration architecture options

Summary

WirelessMaking

Infrastructure

The Dependable Programmable Processor

DSP or GPPDifferences are somewhat subtle these days

Focused on embedded market

Lower power per function

Lower cost per function

Focused on arithmetic functions that also

require control

DSPs tend to be . . .

Focused on computing market

Focused on decision making

Good for housekeeping and control

GPPs tend to be . . .

WirelessMaking

Infrastructure

The Dependable Programmable Processor

A really good platform for the type of OO C, C++, SDR programming that everybody does“Mild” multi-core is appearing

e.g., TNET3010Less than 10 coresUsually aimed at DSP farm applications

e.g., Transcoding, RNC, GGSN

Can be light on MIPs due to limited parallelism

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureGood Ol’ FPGA

Large amounts of parallelism

Programming style like RTLNeeds support to work in a SDR environment

Traditionally used for glue logic

Embedded multipliers and cores are moving FPGAs into DSP

Power and Cost have been traditional impediments

WirelessMaking

Infrastructure“Reconfigurable” Processors

A catch all for anyone who isn't GPP/DSP or FPGA

e.g., Morpho, Freescale, Picochip, PACTUsually have parallelism between DSP and FPGAClaim to be easy to program but this is far from clear

Usually involve a mixture of C code and RTL like structured codingDebug can be difficultNot suitable for control code

WirelessMaking

Infrastructure“Reconfigurable” Processors

Fall into 2 categoriesParallel array of programmable elementsParallel array of ALUs

IssuesLocal connectivityUtilization of resources in real applications

Programmable Elements Parallel Elements

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureTI’s View: Why DSPs

Real time algorithms need a device which effectively handles both math intensive functions and control code functionality !!

2. Control and Real-time Decision Making

GPPRISC

FPGA/ASIC

Reconfigurable

MassivelyParallel

DSP is best solution for cost-effective, high-performance signal processing problems

1. Multiplication and Arithmetic Operations

WirelessMaking

Infrastructure

L1P(32k)

TCP2

McBSP Gigabit Ethernet UTOPIA Serial

RapidIODDR2EMIF EMIF 64

GPIOTimers Others

L2 (2MBytes)

HPIPCI-66

Boo

tI2C PLLs

C64x+ Core

VCP2

W IINST.

VLYNQ

L1D(32K)

DSP Block Diagram: TMS320TCI6482

EDMA 3.0 (Switch Fabric)

Chip rateinst

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureAgenda

Why we love reconfiguration

Degrees of reconfiguration

Where are we today?

Software Defined Radio

Reconfiguration architecture options

Summary

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureWhy/What is Reconfigurable

Reconfiguration being pushed by:Standards evolution

Complexity

Cost

NRE and time to market

Not by multimode modems

Reconfiguration comes in many forms −from software to common mechanicals

WirelessMaking

InfrastructureProgress

SDR is an OO approach to complex system development

It enables reconfiguration rather than being driven by it

Most architecture progress is in DBB:More DSP / GPP MHz

More DSP focused FPGA

New reconfigurable architectures


Recommended