of 98
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
1/98
1
Contents
ChapterI Pages
1.0 The Law of Partnership 3
1.1 Definitions of Partnership 6
1.2 The Essential Elements of a Partnership 7
1.2.1 There must be an agreement entered into by all the persons 8
Concerned
1.2.2 The agreement must be to share the profits of a business 12
1.2.3 Carried on by all or any of them acting for all 14
1.3 Distinguish between Partnership and Company 17
1.4 Mode of Determining the Existence of Partnership 20
1.5 Different Kinds of Partnership 27
1.5.1 Ordinary Partnership 28
1.5.2 Partnership atwill 28
1.5.3 Particular Partnership 30
1.6 Property of the Partnership Firm 31
1.7 Relationship of Partners 34
1.7.1 Relationship of Partners to One Another 34
1.7.2 Relationship of Partners to Third Parties 35
1.7.2.1 Implied Authority 37
1.7.2.2 Partnership by Holding Out 45
1.7.3 Minor Benefits to Partnership 48
1.7.3.1 Rights 49
1.7.3.2 Duties 52
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
2/98
2
1.8 Reconstitution of a Partnership Firm 54
1.8.1 Introduction of a Partner 55
1.8.2 Retirement of the Partner 551.8.3 Expulsion of Partner 63
1.8.4 Insolvency of a Partner 641.8.5 Death of a Partner 651.8.6 Transfer of a Partner's Interest 661.9 Dissolution of a Firm (Partnership) 67
1.9.1 Modes of Dissolution of a Firm 68
1.9.1.1 Dissolution by Agreement 68
1.9.1.2 Compulsory Dissolution 69
1.9.1.3 On the Happening of Certain Contingencies 70
1.9.1.4
By Notice of a Partnership At will 701.9.1.5 By the Court 721.9.2 Division of Profits and Losses upon Dissolution 74
1.9.3 Sale of Goodwill after Dissolution 77
1.9.3.1. Rights of Buyer and Seller of Goodwill 79
1.10 Registration of a Firm 81
1.10.1Application for Registration 851.10.2 Effect of Registration 87
1.10.3 Effects of Non-registration 91
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
3/98
3
Chapter 1
1.0 The Law of PartnershipIn our day to day life we usually enter into contracts for
commercial and non-commercial purposes. A contract is an agreement creating
and defining obligations between the parties. Partnership also includes contrasts
for commercial purposes. As soon as commerce develops beyond the most
elementary stage, merchants begin to find it desirable to carry on their business
in association. They may form loose associations for the purposes of carrying
through some particular enterprises, sometimes called syndicates, or more stable
groups intended to subsist for longer periods, called partnership.
In Myanmar the Partnership Act was enacted as India Act IX of 1932 on
the date of 1stOctober, 1932. In the Act there are altogether VIII Chapters and
74 sections.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
4/98
4
1
2
The relation of partnership arise from contract and not from status -
The Section 5 of the Partnership Act, provide that, "the relation ofpartnership arise from contract and not from status". Therefore, partnership canonly arise as a result of a contract between the parties and not from status. So,
when a person agrees with another to share the profits of a business, to be
carried on by them together, the partnership arising from such agreement is said
to be outcome of contract.
Jointor co-ownershipdoes not itself create partnership whether the ownerdoes or not share any profits made by the use of the thing owned. Partnership is
necessarily the result of agreement. Co-ownership is not the result of contract.
1Partnership Act (1932) Act No. 9
2The Myanmar Code Vol. 9 Page 171
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
5/98
5
For example:-
Husband and wife are co-owners of the house but they are not partners.
Although rent will be shared equally between them, it is only matrimonial right
conferred by law. If they made an agreement to do hotel business by their house
and to share the profits equally from such business there husband and wife are
partners of such business.
-
In particular Myanmar Buddhist husband and wife carrying on business
are not partners. Similarly the members of a Hindu undivided family carrying
on business are not partners.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
6/98
6
3
1.1Definitions of Partnership
Partnership is defined as "the relation which subsists betweenpersons carrying on a business in common with a view of profit."1
Section 239(d) of the Indian Contract Act2defined that "Partnership is
the relation which subsists between persons who have agree to combine their
property, labor or skill in some business, and to share the profits there of
between them.
3
In Myanmar Naing-Ngan, the term "Partnership" is defined by thePartnership Act4, Section 4 as "Partnership is the relation between persons who
have agreed to share the profits of a business carried on by all or any of them
acting for all.
3Hindu undivided family
1The Partnership Act of 1890 Section (1)
2
Indian Act No. (9) of 18723Contract Act (1872) sce: 239
4Indian Act No. (9) of 1872
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
7/98
7
Therefore, persons who have entered into partnership with one another
are called individually 'partners' and collectively 'a firm' and the name underwhich their business is carried on is called the "firm name".
fir
1.2The Essential Elements of a Partnership
The definition of "Partnership" under section 4 contains theessential element of the relationship of Partnership as follow:-
(1) There must be an agreementbetween two or more persons.
4
(2) The agreement must be with the intention to forma partnership business andto share the profitsof that business.
(3) The business must be carried on by all or any of them acting for all.
4Agreement
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
8/98
8
All these elements must be present before a group of associates can be
held to be partners. These elements may appear to overlap, but they are
nevertheless distinct. The first element relates to the voluntary contractual
nature of partnership; the second gives the motive which leads to the formation
of firms; and the third shows that the persons of the group who conduct the
business as age for all the persons in the group, and are therefore liable to
account for all.
1.2.1 There must be an agreement entered into by all the personsconcerned
5
This element shows that a partnership is formed by an agreement, either
express or implied. It may be either in writing or oral or be inferred by the
conduct of the parties who are said to be in such a relationship.
5 Agreement
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
9/98
9
6 7 8
9
A business without agreement, whether intends to do partnership or not,
must be assumed by the conduct of persons, which was decided in the case of
Koo Gyee Hoke and six others vs. Wee Tin Shan and four others . In this case apartnership firm by the name of "Sin Eng Choon"
1
was established some 70years of age. There were only two partners called "Koo Ban Pan" and "Wee Po
Ee". Wee Po Ee died in 1892 and Koo Ban Pan's conduct since the time of Wee
Po Ee's death had all along been in the nature of a sole poprietorship. But Daw
Khet, wife of Wee Po Ee enjoyed a defined share of the profits of the business
of Sin Eng Choon. Section 42 provides that unless there is no contrary term, a
partnership firm formed only two persons is dissolved when a partner dies. Daw
Khet, even enjoyed a defined share of the profits of that business there was no
testimony regarding the agreement between Daw Khet and Koo Ban Pan since
Wee Po Ee died. Therefore, in the absence of any testimony regarding property
6 Expressed
7 Oral
8
Implied9 Conduct
1 1967. B.L.R. (C.C) P.170
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
10/98
10
of the firm, it cannot be said that Daw Khet became a partner. After the death of
Daw khet, her son, plaintiff Wee Tin Shan never became a partner and he has no
right to sue as a partner, because there was no testimony that he was a partner in
the business.
*
*
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
11/98
11
In "Dawood Sahib vs. Sheik Mohideen"1 case, there were two persons,"A" and "B" agreed to form a partnership firm and to share to profits ofcontinued that business as his father was alive. But there was no express
agreement between "C" and "B" which made no objection for "Cs entrance.The Court held that "C" was entitled to get share profits as when his father wasalive.
*
Therefore, it can be seen that if there is no agreement either in writing or
oral or by the conduct of the parties to enter into a partnership business, they
cannot be held as partners.
1A.I.R. 1930. (Mad 5) P.46
*Dawood Sahib Vs Sheik Mohideen. A.I.R. 1938: Mad, 5 (P.46)
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
12/98
12
1.2.2 The agreement must be to share the profits of a business
The second element states that there must be a business and the
agreement must relate to the sharing of profits arising from such business. The
word "business" includes every trade, occupation and profession.
The sharing of profits is an essential element of a partnership agreement.
Profits ean net profit, that is to say, the excess of returns over advances.
*For example:-
'A' and 'B' agree to sell cotton in their joint account and to share theprofits equally. Here, Aand Bare partners in respect of such cotton. This meansa business without sharing profits is not a partner.
*Abdulla Vs. Allah Diya. 8. Lah: 310
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
13/98
13
So, a business without the statement of sharing profits is not a
partnership. In the case of a* , the
court decided as follows:-
*
* -
* -
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
14/98
14
In this case the court held that the firm is not a partnership firm because
there is no agreement between the partners that they shall have to share the
profit.
Therefore, the sharing of profits is only a prima facieevidence and not aconclusive evidence of the existence of partnership.
1.2.3 Carried on by all or any of them acting for all The third element states the principles that "the law of partnership is
branch of the law of principal and agent." This is a very important ingredient of
a partnership. The underlying and fundamental principle which constitutes a
partnership is the idea of "agency". That is to say, each partner is an agent
binding the other persons who are his principals and each partner is again a
principal, who is in turn bound by the acts of the other partners.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
15/98
15
Section 18 of the Partnership Act states that, "subject to the provisions of
this Act, a partner is the agent of the firm for the purposes of the business of the
firm".
10
For example:-
Each partner carrying on the business is regarded as a principal and as an
agent for all the other partners. That is an act of each partner, when carrying on
the business of the firm, is an act of the firm and it binds all the partners.
In the case of Cox vs. Hickman1 the Court held that, the true text ofpartnership is mutual agency that is whether there is sharing of profits so as to
10Principal and Agent
1(1860), 8. H.L.C. 268
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
16/98
16
constitute the relation of principal and agent between the persons taking the
profits and those actually carrying on the business.
CoxVs.Hickman*
In determining whether a person is or is not a partner in a firm, the Court
must consider all the facts and circumstances of the case, e.g.,
(i) the existence of any agreement between the parties,
(ii) the conduct of the parties towards one another,
(iii) the mode of doing business,
(iv) the right to control property,
(v) the manner in which the accounts of the business are kept,
*
Cox Vs. Hickman (1860, 8. H.L.C 268. (312)
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
17/98
17
(vi) the right to receive profits and etc.,
In other words, all the relevant facts taken together must show the
existence of all three essential elements in a partnership agreement.
1.3 The Distinction between a Firm and a CompanyThe distinctions between a firm and a company may be stated as
follows:-
(1)A firm means all the partners collectively: it is not asdistinct entity apart from its members. A company is a
company which is a distinct person apart from its members.
(2)The property of the firm is the property of all the partners.
The property of a company is not the property of its
members.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
18/98
18
(3)All the partners are jointly and severally liable for all thedebts of a firm. Members of a company are not, as such,
liable for the debts of a company.
(4) Members of a company are not its agents. Everypartner is an agent of the firm.
(5) A partner cannot ordinarily transfer his share so as tomake the transferee a partner. A member of a company
can ordinarily transfer his shares so as to make the
transferee a member.
(6) The liability of partners in a firm is unlimited. Theliability of the members of a company is usually limited
to the extent of the amount unpaid on their shares or to
the extent of their guarantee.
(7) A partner cannot contract with his firm because it is nota person. A member of a company can contract with the
company.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
19/98
19
(8) Partners may make any agreement as they like and varytheir contract as and when they please. A company is
bound by its articles and memorandum which can be
altered only to a limited extend as provided by the
Company Law.
(9) There is no such statutory provision for firms. Acompany is bound by law to maintain proper books of
account and to have its accounts audited.
(10) A firm may be dissolved of any time by agreement. Acompany can only be dissolved as laid down by law.
(11) A firm is dissolved on the death of a partner in the
absence of a contract. A company being a distinct person
goes on though its members may change.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
20/98
20
(12) A firm cannot have more than twenty partners in anycase and not more than ten if the business is a banking
business. Except in the case of a private company there
is no restriction on the number of members in a
company.
1.4 Mode of Determining the Existence of Partnership (The Test of Partnership)
It is often a very difficult matter to determine, in the absence of a definite
partnership agreement, whether a partnership exists or not. In determining
whether a person is or not a partner of a firm, regard shall be had to the real
relation between the parties, as shown by all the relevant facts taken together.
Section 6 of the Partnership Act also provides that, in determining
whether a group of persons is or is not a firm, or whether a person is or is not a
partner in a firm, regard shall be had to the real relation between the parties, as
shown by all relevant facts taken together.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
21/98
21
11Explanation;The sharing of profits or of gross returns arising from property by persons
holding a joint or common interest in that property does not of itself make such
persons partners.
Example; Myanmar Buddhist husband and wife are co-owners of thehouse but they are not partners. Although rent will be shared equally betweenthem, it is only the conferred by Myanmar Customary Law.
-
Explanation; The receipt by a person of a share of the profits of abusiness, or of a payment contingent upon the earning of profits or varying with
the profits earned by a business, does not of itself make him a partner with the
persons carrying on the business, and in particular, the receipt of such share or
payment
11Real relationship
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
22/98
22
12
-
(a) by a lender of money to persons engaged or about to engage in
any business,
(b) by a servant or agent as remuneration,
(c)
by the widow or child of a deceased partner as annuity,
(d) by a previous owner or part owner of the business, asconsideration for the sale of the goodwill or share thereof,
does not of itself make the receiver a partner with the person
carrying on the business.
12share
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
23/98
23
Therefore according to paragraph (a) "a person who has lent money to
persons engaged or about to engage in any business is not a partner. He is just a
moneylender.
In paragraph (b), it shows that an agent or servant is not a partner
although he takes the profits as remuneration. It was decided in the case
of"
1, it was stated that taking a "bonus" is not sharing benefits of the business.
* 13
14
11961 ckESpf? r.w.p/ pm 143-146/*
( )( ) ()13Foke Kyan Syndicate14
Bonus
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
24/98
24
-
Paragraph (c) was shown in the case of "Koo Gee Hoke and six others vs.We Tin Shan and four others".2
This case said that the widow of Wee Po Ee was not become a partner but
merely enjoyed the defined profit from the firm. She enjoyed the share as the
widow of deceased partner as annuity.
*
21967. B.I.R (C.C) P.170
*
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
25/98
25
According to paragraph (d), a previous owner of the business who
enjoyed the money from the sale of goodwill or share is not a partner in existing
business.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
26/98
26
Therefore, in determining whether a person is or is not a partner in a firm,
the court must consider all the facts and circumstances of the case and inductive
approach to the provisions of Section 4, 5 and 6 of the Partnership Act.
So, in determining whether a group of persons is or is not a firm, or
whether a person is or is not a partner in a firm, regard shall be had to the real
relation between partners, as shown by all relevant facts taken together.
*
*
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
27/98
27
--
1.5 Different Kinds of Partnership
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
28/98
28
There are different kinds of partnership as follows:-
-
(1) Ordinary Partnership
15(2) Partnership at - will
16
(3) Particular Partnership
17
1.5.1 Ordinary Partnership ()The parties are at liberty to fix the duration of the partnership or say
nothing about it. Where the partners stipulate that they should carry on business
for a definite period of time, it is called a partnership for a fixed term or
ordinary partnership. When the fixed term is over, the partnership comes to an
end.
15Ordinary Partnereship (or) Partneaship for a Fixed period.
16Partnerihip at will
17Particular Partuership
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
29/98
29
1.5.2 Partnership at will( )
A partnership is deemed partnership-at-will when (i) no fixed has been
agreed upon the duration of the partnership and (ii) there is no provision made
as to the determination of the partnership in any other way.
On the other hand, where no provision is made by contract between the
partnerships for the duration of their partnership or for the determination of their
partnership, it is called partnership-at-will.1
In the case of San Win vs. U Ba Nyunt2, it was decided about thepartnership at-will.
]]partnership at-will
1Section 7 of the Partnership Act.
2 U San Win vs. U Ba Nyunt , 1963. B.L.R (C.C) 644.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
30/98
30
Therefore, a partner, in the case of partnership-at-will, can retire from the
firm dissolve it whenever he thinks proper by merely giving notice in writing to
other partners of his intention to that effect.
18
*
1.5.3 Particular Partnership
A partnership may be described as a "Particular partnership" when a
person becomes a partner with another person in a particular adventure or under
taking or an isolated transaction or speculation or course of trade voyage.
18Notice
*
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
31/98
31
Therefore, a particular partnership means that, a person may become a
partner with another person in adventure of undertakings. 1
In the case of "Tan Soon Le vs. Yoe Tong Hoe 2, it also was held that apartnership relating to a particular venture can only be dissolved after the
venture has come to an end.
**
aafi
*
1.6 Property of the Partnership Firm2
1 Section 8 of the Partnership Act
2
1962. B.L.R. (C.C) 117.** **
SauelmNadar Vs. Thangayya Nadar. A. I. R. (1942) Mad; 104
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
32/98
32
The property of the firm includes all properties, rights and interests inpropertyoriginally brought into the stock of the firm or acquired by purchase ofotherwise, by or for the firm, or for the purpose and in the course of business of
the firm, and also includes the goodwill of the business.3
Thus, property of the firm includes:-
(a) Property originally brought into the partnership stock;(b) Property acquired in the course of the partnership business;
(c) The goodwill of the firm
Section 14 of the Partnership Act is laid down that goodwill of a business
is to be regarded as the property of the firm.
19 ]
Unless the contrary intention appears, property, and rights and interests in
property acquired with money belonging to the firm are deemed to have
acquired for the firm.
Subject to the contract between the partners, the property of the firm shall
be held and used by the partners exclusive for purposes of the the business.1
3
Section 14 of the Partnership Act19Goodwill1Section 15 of the Partnership Act
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
33/98
33
-
*
*
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
34/98
34
In settling the accounts of a firm after dissolution, the goodwill shall,subject to contract between the partners, be included in the assets and it may be
sold either separately or along with other property of the firm.4
20
21
]
*
1.7 Relationship of Partners
Relationship of partners will be considered as two parts. One is
relationship between Partners and relationship with third party.
1.7.1 Relationship of Partners to One Another4Section 55 of the Partnership Act
20
Trade Mark21Assets of the firm*(21. C.W.N. 632)
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
35/98
35
The relation of partners to one another is usually governed by the articles
of the partnership firm. If there is no written partnership agreement, their
relation will be governed by the course of dealing among themselves.
The mutual rights and duties of the partners of a firm may be determined
by contractbetween the partners. Such a contract may be expressed or may beimplied by a course of dealings of the firm. The contract may be varied by
consent of all the partners.2
22 23
]
Such contracts may provide that a partner shall not carry on any business
other than that of the firm while he is a partner.
2
Section 11 of the Partnership Act22Expressedly23
Impliedly
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
36/98
36
]
1.7.2 Relationship of Partners to Third Parties
Every partner is the agent of the firm for the purposes of the business of
the firm.3
If two or more persons agree to carry on a partnership business and share
its profits, each is a principal and each is an agent for the other, and also each is
bound by the other contract in carrying on the business, as much as a single
principal would be bound by the act of an agent.
An admission or representation made by a partner concerning the affairs
of the firm is evidence against the firm, if it is made in the ordinary course of
business.
3Section 18 of the Partnership Act
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
37/98
37
24
-
This means that the principal of agency is the essence of the partnership
relation.A partnership is both as a principal and an agent.
25
Subject to the provisions of Section 22, the act of a partner which is done
to carry on, in the usual way, business of the kind carried on by the firm, bindsthe firm.
1
1.7.2.1 Implied Authority 26
The authority of a partner to bind the firm conferred by this section is
called his "implied authority".
24Ordinary course of business
25
Principal and Agent1Section 19 (1) of the Partnership Act.26
Implied Authority
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
38/98
38
In the absence of any usage or custom of trade to the contrary, the impliedauthorityof a partner does not empower him to:-
(a) submit a dispute relating to the business of the firm to arbitrate
(b)open a banking account on behalf of the firm in his own name,
(c)compromise or relinquish any claim or portion of a claim by the firm,
(d) withdraw a suit or proceeding field on behalf of the firm,(
(e) admit any libel/liabilities in a suit or proceeding against the firm,
(f) acquire immovable property on behalf of the firm,
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
39/98
39
(g) transfer immovable property belonging to the firm, or
(h) enter into partnership on behalf of the firm.2
The reason, why a partner is not entitled to do above acts in the absence of
agreement or custom, is that a dishonest partner may involve the firm and his
co-partners in liability if he is allowed to act alone.
-
2Section 19 of the Partnership Act
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
40/98
40
27
*
**
28
*
27Managing Partner
*Hari Sanker Misra V. Rirm Rai Bahadur Bansilal Abiehand.
(1946: Nag. 301: A.I.R. 1946, Nag. P.266)**
28Ostensible Authority.
*Bond V.Gibvson, 10. R.A 665
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
41/98
41
**
-
29
***
It is, however, open to the partners by means of an express contract to
extend or limit the implied authority but third parties will be bound by such a
limitation only when they have notice of such a limitation.1
All the partners are jointly and severally liable on any contract entered
into by any of the partners.
**Mathura Nath V. Sree Jukta Rageshwari.46, Cal. L.J. 352.
29
Title deeds***Asan Kani V. Somasudaram. 31 Mad. 208
1Section 20 of the Partnership Act
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
42/98
42
Where by the wrongful act of a partner acting in the ordinary course of
business or with authority of other partners, loss or injury is caused to third
party, the firm is liable therefore to as the same extent as the contracting partner
is.2
30
31 32 33
34 35
Where -
(a)a partner acting within his apparent authority receives money orproperty from a third party and minapplies,or
2Section 26 of the Partnership Act
30Wrongful act
31Omission
32Third paty
33
Loss34Injury
35Penalty
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
43/98
43
(b)a firm in the course of its business receives money or property from athird party, and the money or property is misapplied by any of the
partners while it is in the custody of the firm,
the firm is liable to make good the loss.
36
*
36Misappropriation
*
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
44/98
44
*
It is, however, necessary that the obligation should have been incurred in
such a way as to bind the firm that is the partner should not have contracted in
his individual capacity but as a partner of the firm and agent of the other
partners and in the name of the firm. 3
* 3Section 22 of the Partnership Act
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
45/98
45
Any admission or any representation made by any partner in the course of
the business will bind the firm and other partners. This is again based on the
principle that every partner is an agent of the other partners.5
1.7.2.2 Partnership by Holding Out 37
Anyone who by words spoken or written or by conduct represents
himself, or knowingly permits himself to be represented, to be a partner in a
firm, is liable as a partner in that firm to anyone who has on the faith of any
such representation given credit to the firm, whether the person representinghimself or represented to be a partner does or does not know that the
representation has reached the person so giving credit. 6
-
5
Section 23 of the Partnership Act37Holding Out.
6Section 25(1) of the Partnership Act
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
46/98
46
]
Thus, if "A" induces "B" to believe that he (A) is the partner of a firm(AB) and "B" believing "A" to be a partner gives credit to the firm AB, "A" will
be responsible to "B" for any loss suffered by him (B) and cannot deny himselfto be a partner of the firm although in fact he is not a partner. This is known as
partnership by holding out.
But, where after a partner's death the business is continued in the name ofthe old firm, the continued use of that the name, or of the deceased partner's
name as a part thereof, shall not of itself make his legal representative or his
estate liable for any act of the firm after his death.1
]
The Doctrine of Holding Out 38 1Section 25(2) of the Partnership Act
38Holding Out.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
47/98
47
Under Sec.28 of the partnership Act, the "doctrine of holding out" is dealt
with runs as follows:-
(1) That by words or conduct he represented himself to be apartner or knowingly permitted himself to be represented
himself as a partner anyone.
*
(2) That the other person on the faith of the representation
gave credit to the firm.
(3) Where after a partner's death the business is continued in the
name of the old firm, the continued use of the decease
partner's name as a part thereof shall not of itself make his
*Mollow Marsh & Co. V. Court of Wards. 1872. L.R. 4 P.C. Page. 435.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
48/98
48
legal representative or his estate for any act of the firm done
after his death.
(3)
(4) Where a man holds himself out as a partner, or allows other
to do it, he is then properly by estoppels from denying the
character he has assumed and upon the faith of which
creditors may be presumed to have acted. A man so acting
may be rightly held liable as a partner by estoppels.
39
*
Therefore, the doctrine of "holding out" is a part of estoppels, that whereone person by words or conduct includes another to believe him and act upon
the existence of a particular state of facts, he cannot afterwards as regards that
person deny the existence of such facts.
39Active Partner
*
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
49/98
49
1.7.3 Minor Benefits to Partnership
Since a minor is not competent to enter into a contract, he cannot become
a partner in a firm. However, a minor can be admitted to the benefits of an
already existing partnership if all the partners agree to admit him. As he is not a
partner, the minor is not personally liable nor is his separate property, for the
debts of the firm; but his share in the partnership property and profits will be so
liable.
A person who is a minor according to the law to which he is subject may
not be a partner in a firm. The following rights, liabilities and disabilities may
be stated when a minor can be admitted to the benefits of firm.
Rights and duties of Minor
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
50/98
50
1.7.3.1 Rights
A person who is a minor according to the law to which he is subject may
not be a partner in a firm, but, with the consent of all the partners for the
time being, he may be admitted to the benefits of partnership.
Such rights are-
(a)A mionr has a right to such share of the property and of the profits ofthe firm as may be agreed upon and
-
(b) he may have access to and inspect and copy any of the
accounts of the firm.
(c) Such minor may not sue the partners of an account or payment
of his share of the property or prefits of the firm save when
severing his connection with the firm,
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
51/98
51
(d) Where such person desires to become a partner to attaining
majority, he has entitled to determind a partner in the firm.
(e) Where such person does not desire to become a partner after
attaining majority, he shall give the public notice that he has
elected not to become a parter in the firm.
(f) Where such person becomes a partner his rights and liabilities
as a minor continue up to the date on which he become a
partner, but he also become personally liable to third parties
for all act of the firm done since he was admitted to the
benefits of partnership.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
52/98
52
(g) his share in the property and benefits of the firm shall be the
share to which he was entitled as a minor.
(h) Where such person elects not to become a partner-
-
(1) his share shall not be liable for any acts of the firm done
after the date of the notice.
(2) he shall be entitled to sue the partners for his share of the
property and benefits.
1.7.3.2 Duties
(a) For act doing of the firm before the attaining majority, he shall only be
liable for the amount of his investment.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
53/98
53
(b) Where such person becomes a partner his rights and liabilities as a
minor continue up to the date on which he become a partner, but he also
become personally jointly or severally liable to third parties for all act of
the firm done since he was admitted to the benefits of partnership.
(c) At any time within six months of his attaining majority, a minor shall
be liable automatically as a partner if he does not give public notice.
(d) If a minor act as to be a partner after attaing majority, he shall be
liable as a partner before public notice.
(e) Where a minor elects not to become a partner his rights and liabilities
shall continue to be those of a minor up to the date on which he
gives public notice.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
54/98
54
(f) Where any person has been admitted as a minor to the benefits of
partnership in a firm, the burden of proving the fact that such
person no knowledge of such admission until a particular date after
the expiry of six months of his attaining majority shall lie on the
person asserting that fact.
1.8 Reconstitution of a Partnership Firm
The term "reconstitution of a firm" means the change takes place in theconstitution of a firm. These changes occur by the:-
(1) introduction of a new partner.
(2) retirement of partner.
(3) expulsion of a partner.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
55/98
55
(4) insolvency of a partner.
(5) death of a partner.
(6) transfer of a partner's interest.
Subject to contract between the partner, where a change occurs in the
constitution of a firm, the mutual rights and duties of the partner in the
reconstituted firm remain the same as they were immediately before the change
,as far as may be;
1
]1.8.1 Introduction of a PartnerNo person shall be introduced as a partner in a firm without the consent
of all the existing partners. The liability of the new partner commences from
the date when he is admitted as a partner unless there is a contract providing
otherwise.
1reconstituted firm
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
56/98
56
]
1.8.2 Retirement of the PartnerA partner may retire:-
(a) with the consent of all the partners,(b) in accordance with an express agreement by the partners, or(c) where the partnership is at will, by giving notice in writing
to all the other partners of his intention to retire.
40-
]
So a partner may, in a partnership as will, retire by without any condition
or by prescribeing with conditions or by giving the notice to the other partner
from a firm.
40Voluntary Retirement
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
57/98
57
The retired partner continues to remain liable as partner to third parties
for all acts of the firm if done before retirement until public notice is given of
the retirement.
But a retired partner is not liable to any third party who deals with the
firm without knowing that he was a partner.
]
-
-
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
58/98
58
Section 72 of the Act lays down the mode of giving public notice. In
every case where a public notice is required by the Act, it must be affected by
publication in the Official Gazette and in at least one vernacular newspaper
circulating in the district where the firm to which it relates has its place orprincipal place of business.
Notwithstanding the retirement of a partner from a firm, he and partners
continue to be liable as partners to third parties for any act done by any of them
which would have been an act of the firm if done before the retirement, until
public notice is given of the retirement:
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
59/98
59
]
72 (a) A public notice under this Act is given-
Where it relates to the retirement or expulsion of a partner from a registered
firm, or the dissolution of a registered firm, or to the election to become or not
to become a partner in a registeredfirm by a person attaining majority who was
admitted as a minor to the benefits of partnership,by notice to the registrar of
firms under section 63, and by publication in the Gazette and in at least one
vernacular newspaper circulatingin the district where the firm to which it relates
its place or principal place of business.
-
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
60/98
60
(b)in any other case, by publication in the Gazette and in at least one
vernacular newspaper circulatingin the district where the firm to which it
relates its place or principal place of business.
Provided that a retired partner is not liable to any third party who deals
with the firm without knowing that he was a partner.
]
41
*
(4) Notices under sub-section (3) may be given by the retired partner
or by any partner of the reconstituted firm.
]
The rights of a retired partner are as follows-
41Sleeping Partner
*Rams Sami V, Kadar Bibi, 9, Mad, 492
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
61/98
61
An outgoing partner may carry on a business competing with that of
the firm and he may advertise such business, but, subject to
contract to the contrary, he may not
-
(a) use the firm name,
(b) represent himself as carrying on the business of the
firm, or
(c) solicit the custom of persons who were dealing withthe firm before he ceased to be a partner.
]
A partner may make an agreement with his partners that on
ceasing to be a partner he will not carry on any business
similar to that of the firm within a specified period or within
specified local limits: and, notwithstanding anything
contained in section 27 of the Contract Act, such agreement
shall be valid if the restrictions imposedare reasonable.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
62/98
62
42 ]
Where any member of a firm has died or otherwise ceased to be a
partner, and the serviving or continuing partners carry on the business of
the firm with the property of the firm without any final settlement of
accounts as between them and the outgoing partner or his estate,then, inthe absence of a contract to the contrary, the outgoing partner or his estate
is entitled at the option of himself or his representatives to such share of
the profitsmade since he ceased to be a partner as may be attributable to
the use of his share of the property of the firm or to interest at the rate of
six per cent, per annum on the amout of his share in the property of the
firm.
42Reasnnable
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
63/98
63
A continuing guarantee given to a firm, or to a third party in
respect of the transactions of a firm, is, in the absence of agreement
to the contrary, revoked as to future transactions from the date of
any change in constitution of the firm.
*
*
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
64/98
64
**
1.8.3 Expulsion of PartnerA partner can be expelled from a firm only under the following
circumstances:-
(a) the power to expel is conferred in the contract of partnership.
(b) the power is exercised in good faith by the majority of thepartners,
(c) the expelled partner should have some intimation of thecause of complaint and an opportunity of meeting the case
alleged against him. (Sec. 33)
As expelled partner is liable for all debts contracted before his expulsion
and he continues to be liable for the debts of the firm contracted after his
expulsion till a public notice of his expulsion is given.
**Wzekiel Moses V. The Russia Engineering Works.Ltd. 1 Rangoon. 47
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
65/98
65
1.8.4 Insolvency of a Partner 43
Where a partner in a firm is adjudicated an insolvent he ceases to be a
partner on the date on which the order of adjudication is made.1
]
If a firm is not dissolved by such order of adjudication, the share of the
insolvent partner vests in the Official Assignee or Official Receiver and theinsolvent partner ceases to be liable for any debts of the firm and the firm ceases
to be bound by any act of such partner.
]
1.8.5 Death of a Partner 44
43insolveney
1Section 34 of the Partnership Act
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
66/98
66
Ordinary the death of a partner has the effect of dissolving the partnership
as regards all the partners. However the partners may agree that by the death of
a partner the firm is not dissolved. Where a firm is not so dissolved, the estate of
a deceased partner is not liable for any act of the firm done after his death.2
Subject to contract between the partners, a firm is dissolved by the dead
of a partner.
]
Notwithstanding the dissolution of a firm, the partners continue to be
liable as such to third parties for any act done by any of them which would have
been an act of them if done before the dissolution, until public notice is given ofthe dissolution:
1.8.6 Transfer of a Partner's Interest
A partner may transfer his share to a third person, absolutely or by way of
security.
44Death
2Section 35 of the Partnership Act
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
67/98
67
If the firm is dissolved or if the transferring partner ceases to be a partner,
the transferee is entitled as against removing partners to receive the share of the
assets of the firm to which the transferring partners is entitled and for the
purpose of ascertaining that share, to an account as form the date of the
dissolution.3
1.9 Dissolution of a Firm (Partnership) 45"Dissolution of the firm" means the cessation of jural relationship
amongst all the partners of a firm.1
It differs from reconstitution in the following respects:-
(a) In the case of dissolution, the whole firm is dissolved;whereas, there is no dissolution of the firm in the case of a
reconstitution.
(2) In the case of dissolution, there is complete cessation of juralrelationship amongst all the partners; whereas in the case of
3
Section 29 of the Partnership Act45Dissolution a firm1Section 39 of the Partnership Act
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
68/98
68
reconstitution, there is no such severance of jural
relationship among the partners in the reconstituted firm and
they carry on the business of the firm.
1.9.1 Modes of Dissolution of a Firm
There are five different modes of the dissolution of a firm:-
(a) dissolution by agreement,
(b) compulsory dissolution
(c) dissolution on the happening of certain contingencies,
(d) dissolution by notice of a partnership at will, and
46
(e) dissolution by court.
46Notice
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
69/98
69
47
1.9.1.1 Dissolution by Agreement A firm may be dissolved with the consent of all the partners or in
accordance with a contract between the partners. (Section 40)
1.9.1.2 Compulsory Dissolution (1) by the adjudication of all the partners or of all the partners but one
as insolvent, or
(ii) by the happening of any event which makes it unlawful for the
business of the firm to be carried on or for the partners to carry it
on in the partnership.
But where more than one separate adventure or undertaking is carried on
by the firm, the illegality of one or more shall not itself cause the dissolution of
the firm in respect of its lawful adventures and undertakings (Section 41)
47By Order of the Court
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
70/98
70
1.9.1.3 On the Happening of Certain Contingencies
Subject to contract between the partners a firm is dissolved:-
-
(i) if constituted for a fixed term, by the expiry of the term,
(ii) if constituted to carry out one or more adventures or
undertakings, by the completion thereof;
*
(iii) by the death of a partner;
**
(iv) by the adjudication of a partner as an insolvent. (Section 42)
1.9.1.4 By Notice of a Partnership At will 48
*
-
**T.P.Ma Mooty V.Ma Thein Hlaing (a) Ma Asara, 1969. B.L.R. P. 80
48Notice
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
71/98
71
(i) where a partnership is at will, the firm may be dissolved by any
partner giving notice in writing to all the other partners of his intention to
dissolve the firm.
(ii) The firm is dissolved as from the date mentioned in the notice asthe date of dissolution or, if no date is so mentioned, as from the date of
the communication of the notice. (Section 43)
*
49
*Robertson V.Lockie (1846) 15 sim-285.
49Plaint
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
72/98
72
**
1.9.1.5 By the Court() 50At the suit of a partner, the Court may dissolve a firm on any of the
following grounds, namely:-
(i)that a partner has become of unsound mind, 51
52
(ii) that a partner, other than the partner suing ,has become in any waypermanently incapable of performing his duties as partner.
53
(iii) that a partner other than the partner suing is guilty of conduct which islikely to affect prejudicially the carrying on of the business, regard
being had to the nature of the business;
**Sathapara V.Subrmanian. 1927.53 Mad. L.J. 245, 101.1.C. 17
50By Order of the Court
51Insanity
52Next Friend
53Incapacity
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
73/98
73
54
(iv) that the partner other than the partner suing willfully or persistentlycommits breach of agreement relating to the management of the affairs
of the firm or the conduct of its business or otherwise so ducts himself
in matters relation to the business that it is not reasonably practicable
for the other partners to carry on the business in partnership with him;
(v) that a partner other than the partner suing has in any way transferredthe whole of his interest in the firm to a third party or has allowed his
share to be changed sold by the Court;
(vi) that the business of the firm cannot be carried on save at a loss; or
54Misconduct
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
74/98
74
(iv) that court is satisfied that the firm should be dissolved on any other justand equitable ground. (Section 44)
55
1.9.2 Division of Profits and Losses upon Dissolution The partnership agreement may provide for the settlement of accounts
between the partners upon dissolution. In the absence of such agreement, the
following rules laid down by Section 48 of the Partnership Act must beobserved.
(1)Losses, including deficiencies of capital, shall be paid out of profits, nextout of capital and lastly, if necessary, by the partners individually in the
proportions in which they were entitled to share profits. (Sec. 48(a))
) 5657
55just and equitable
56Deficiencies of Capital
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
75/98
75
(2)The assets of the firm, including any sums contributed by the partners tomake up deficiencies of capital shall be applied in the following order:
)
(i) In paying the debts of the firm to third parties;
(ii) In paying to each partner ratably what is due to him fromthe firm for advances as distinguished from capital;
58
(iii) In paying to each partner ratably what is due to him onaccount of capital;
59
57Losses
58Advances
59Ratio
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
76/98
76
(iv) The residue, if any, shall be divided among the partners inthe proportions in which they were entitled to share profits.
(Sec 48 (b))
(3)When there are joint debts due from the firm and also separate debts duefrom any partners, the property of the firm shall be applied in the first
instance in payment of the debts of the firm and, if there is any surplus,
then the share of each partner shall be separate property of any partner
shall be applied first in the payment of his separates, and the surplus, if
any, in the payment of the debts of the firm. (Sec. 49)
There we see that when the partnership assets are not sufficient to pay of
the joint debts of the firm the creditors of the firm can have received from the
partner's separate property only after his separate creditors have been paid. A
partner is not entitled to assist of the firm before proceeding against the partners
individually. In order to discharge the joint debts of the firm after its dissolution
each partner has assisted jointly if surplus is remained.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
77/98
77
1.9.3 Sale of Goodwill after Dissolution
The term "goodwill" is not defined in the Act expressly. Goodwill isproperly a commercial term, which is very easy to describe but very difficult to
define.
It is a commercial term signifying the value of the business in the hands ofa successor. It is something more than the mere chance or probability of oldcustomers maintaining their connection thought this is a material part of the
practical fruits. It may be summed up as "the whole advantage, whatever it maybe, of the reputation and connection of the firm. In valuing the goodwill the
Court should set such a value upon it as existing on the day of the dissolution.
Goodwill shall be included in the assets subject to contract between thepartners and may be sold either separately or along with other properties of the
firm settling the accounts of the firm.1
1Section 55(1) of the Partnership Act
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
78/98
78
]
Where the goodwill of a firm is sold after dissolution, a partner may carry
on a business competing with that of the buyer and he may advertise such
business.
but subject to agreement between him and the buyer he may not-
(a) use the firm name;
(b) represent himself as carrying on the business of the firm, or
(c ) solicit the custom of persons who were dealing with the firm before its
dissolution. (Sec. 55 (2))
However, any partner may, upon the sale of goodwill of a firm, make an
agreement with the buyer that such partner will not carry on any business
similar to that of the firm within a specified period or within specified local
limits. Such an agreement shall be valid if the restrictions imposed are
reasonable, notwithstanding that the agreement may amount to restraint of trade
under Section 27 of the Contract Act.1
1Section 55(3) of the Partnership Act
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
79/98
79
]
Therefore, what goodwill means must depend on the character and nature
of the business to which it is attached: it is composed of a variety of elements
and is bound to differ in its composition in different trades and in different
businesses in the same trade. One element may preponderate in one business
and another in another business.
Section 14 of the Partnership Act is laid down specially that goodwill of abusinessis, subject to contract between the parties, to be regarded as property ofthe firm. It may be sold either separately or along with other property of thefirm.
1.9.3.1 Rights of Buyer and Seller of Goodwill
The goodwill of the business of a firm forms part of the property of
the firm2and therefore subsection (1) of the Section 55 is laid down that subject
to contract between the partners, in settling the accounts of a firm after
dissolution, the goodwill shall be included into the assets of the firm, and if may
be sold either separately or along with other property of the firm. Where the
goodwill of a firm is sold after dissolution;
2Section 14 of the Partnership Act
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
80/98
80
60
61
]
*
Rights of seller are as follows:-
(1)a partner may carry on a business competing with that of thebuyer, and
(2)he may also advertise such business, but the seller (i) must notuse the firm name; (ii) must not represent himself as carrying on
the business of the firm, and (iii) must not solicit the customers
of the old firm.
60
Trade Mark61Assets of the firm*(21. C.W.N. 632)
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
81/98
81
Rights of the buyer are as follows:-
(i)He can use the firm name;
(ii) He can claim the benefit of any convenient by a partner notto carry on a competing business;
(iii) He can trade as his vendor's successor.
1.10 Registration of a Firm
The Partnership Act has made no registration of firms compulsory of it
has imposed any penalties for non-registration. It has only imposed certain
disabilities on unregistered firms: but disabilities are such that a trading firm is
obliged to get itself registered sooner or later.
On the other hand non-registered firms are legal associations as
registration of the firm is not compulsory under the Partnership Act. But non-
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
82/98
82
registration of partnership gives rise to a number of disabilities which have a
persuasive pressure for its registration.
In Myanmar Naing-Ngan, under the Section 56 of Partnership Act, the
President of the Union may, by notification in the Gazette, direct that the
provisions of Chapter VII, (Myanmar Gazette, 1956, Part I, Page 723), shall not
apply to the Union of Myanmar, except the towns of Yangon, Mandalay,
Mawlamyaing, Kyaukphyu, Pathein and Dawae; if the partnership firms are
established in these areas, they shall be needed registration. Therefore, the firms
established in Myanmar Naing-Ngan do not need to be registered, except theabove six towns specified in notification.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
83/98
83
*
62
* 62
Conclusive Evidence
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
84/98
84
*
**
*
(
)
(
)
(
)
()**
K. Ghellabhai & Co. V, Churial & Harakchan Co. & another, 1941. R.L.R. 219
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
85/98
85
1.10.1 Application for RegistrationSection 58 (1)The registration of a firm may be affected at any time by sending
by post or delivering to the Registrar of the area in which any place of business
of the firm is situated or proposed to be situated, a statement in the prescribed
form and accompanied by the prescribed fee, stating:
(a) the firm name, (b) the place or principal place of business of the firm,
(c) the names of any other places where the firm carrieson business,
(d) the date when each partner joined the firm,
(e) the names in full and permanent address of thepartners. and
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
86/98
86
(F) the duration of the firm.1
The statement shall be signed by all the partners or by their agents
specially authorized in this behalf.2
(2) Each person singing the statement shall also verify it in the manner
prescribed.
(3) Afirm name shall not contain any of the following words, namely:"Crown" "Emperor" "Empress" "Empire" "Imperial" "King" "Queen"
"Royal" "President" "Union" or words expressing or implying the section,
approval or patronage of the Government of the Union of Myanmar,
except when the President of the Union signifies his consent to the use of
such words as part of the firm name by order in writing.
1Section 58 of the Partnership Act
2Section 59 of the Partnership Act
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
87/98
87
Section 59 When the Registrar is satisfied that the provisions of section
58 have been duly complied with, he shall record an entry of the statement in a
register called the register of firms, and shall file the statement.
When an alteration is made in the firm name of in the location of the
prinaipal place of business of a registered firm, a statement may be sent to the
Registrar accompanied by the prescribed fee, specifying the alteration, and
signed and verified in the manner required under section 58.
1.10.2 Effect of Registration
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
88/98
88
Any statement, intimation or notice recorded or noted in the register of
firms shall, as against any person by whom or on whose behalf such statement,
intimation or notice was signed, be the conclusive proof of any fact therein
stated.3
A certified copy of an entry relating to a firm in the Register of Firms
may be produced in proof of the fact of registration of such firm, and of the
contents of any statement, intimation or notice recorded or noted therein. 4
Section 70 of the Act imposes a penalty of fine and imprisonment forfurnishing false or incomplete particulars in any statement or document sent to
the Registrar. Thus when once a firm is registered the Register of Firms will
continue to contain a complete, correct and up-to-date list of all partners who
will be liable for the debts of the firm, and the statements recorded in the
Register would afford a strong protection against false denials of partnership
and the evasion of liability to persons who propose to deal with the firm.
3Section 68 (1) of the Partnership Act
4Section 68 (2) Ibid
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
89/98
89
Therefore, a partner of registered firm has the right to sue eteen the
hich ere decided in the case of 1as follows:-
*
63
1
1967. B.L.R (C.C) 383* 63
Conclusive Evidence
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
90/98
90
So, the effect of registration of the firm according to the Act is so great.
The registration of a firm may be affected at any time by sending by post or
delivering to the Registrar of the area in which any place of business of the firm
is situated, a statement in the prescribed form. And a partner of registered firm
has the right to sue between the other partners of the firm in according to
mention above.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
91/98
91
1.10.3 Effects of Non-registration
As already stated registration of firm is not made compulsory
under Section 69 of this Act, but if a firm carries on business without it being
registered, the non-registration creates the following disabilities:
(1) No suit to enforce a right arising from a contract or conferred bythis Act shall be instituted in any court by or on behalf of any
person suing as a partner in a firm against the firm or any person
alleged to be or to have been a partner in the firm unless the firm is
registered and the person suing is or has been shown in the register
of the firm as a partner in the firm. (Sec. 69 (1))
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
92/98
92
(2) No suit to enforce a right arising from a contract shall be institutedin any Court by or on behalf of a firm against any third party unless
the firm is registered and the persons suing are or have been shown
in the register of firms as partners in the firm. (Sec. 69 (2))
(3) The Provisions of Sub-section (1) and (2) shall apply also to aclaim of setoff or other proceeding to enforce a right arising
from a contract, but shall not affect ;
(a)the enforcement of any right to sue for dissolution of a firm
or for accounts of a dissolved firm, or any right or power to
realize the property of a dissolved firm,or
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
93/98
93
(b) the powers of the assignee, receiver or Court under the
Yangon Insolvency Act or the Myanmars Insolvency Act to
realize the property of an insolvent partner.
hair in
sarulla *
64 65
*Khair Diu v. Absarulla. 1963. B.L.R. (C.C) 12
64Promssory Note
65Third Party
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
94/98
94
Therefore, in the case of
1, it was also decided the effects of non-
registration as follows:-
*
So, a partner of an unregistered firm cannot sue except the provisions ofSection 69 (3) of the Partnership Act.
However, this section shall not apply-
(a) to the firms or the partners in firms which have no place of business in
the Union of Myanmar, or whose places of business in the Union of
Myanmar are situated in areas to which by notification of under Section
56, this chapter does not apply, or
11966 B.L.R. (C.C) 598
*
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
95/98
95
(Section 69(4-1))
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
96/98
96
Key TermsPartnership
Partners -
firm-
fir nae -
rdinary Partnership -
Partnership at-ill
Particular Partnership - implied authority -
oint-detors -
oint-creditors -
Partnership stoc -
reconstitution of a firm -
nsolvency -
Liabilities -
Disabilities -
Retirement -
Expulsion -
Remuneration -
Dissolution -
opulsory issolution -
oodill -
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
97/98
97
EXERCISE QUESTIONS1. efine the ter Partnership.
2. What are the essential elements of Partnership? Discuss briefly on each of
them.
3. Distinguish between a firm and a company.
4. "Partnership does not arise from status but comes up from contract."
Discuss.
5. Distinguish between Partnership and Joint Hindu Family.
6. What do you mean by the term "Property of the Firm"?
7. How will you determine whether a person is or is not a partner in a firm?
8. Explain what property includes in the "property of the firm."
9. Write short notes in the following:-
(1) Ordinary Partnership(2)
Partnership at-will
(3) Particular Partnership10. State the law relating to "holding-out" under the Partnership Act.
11. What is the legal effect when a minor is held out as a partner? Explain.
12. State the rights, liabilities and disabilities of a minor in firm.
13. Discuss the liabilities of a partner to third parties.
14. What do you mean by "reconstitution of a Firm? State the rights and
liabilities of an incoming partner.
15. What do you mean by "Dissolution of a Firm"? Answer.
16. State the circumstances under which a firm is compulsory dissolved.
17. What are the different modes in which a firm may be dissolved? State in
brief.
8/14/2019 Business Law-Chapter 1....Law of partnership.pdf
98/98
98
18. What circumstances under which and how may the court dissolve a
partnership of the suit of a partner?
19. When can partnership be dissolved by the court?
20. State briefly the rights and obligations of a partner after dissolution.
21. Explain the mode of settling of accounts between partners regarding
losses of the firm.
22. State the rights of a buyer and seller of the goodwill of a firm after
dissolution.
23. State briefly what ways a Partnership can be dissolved.
24. State briefly the effect of non-registration of a firm under the Partnership
Act.
25. Explain the effect of non-registration of a partnership firm.
26. State the law relating to registration of a firm.
27. Can a Partnership business be conducted without registration? State theeffect of non-registration of a Firm.