Jody Blanke, Professor Computer Information Systems and Law
Mercer University, Atlanta
Sole Proprietorship
GeneralPartnership
LimitedPartnership
Corporation Limited LiabilityCompany
Limited Liability
No NoNo - gen. part.Yes - lim. part.
Yes Yes
Flow-ThroughTaxation
Yes Yes Yes No (double taxation)
Yes
Management/Control
Yes YesYes - gen. part.No - lim. part.
No Yes
Right to ShareIn Profits
Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Sole Proprietorshipeasy to formno formalitiesunlimited personal liabilityno legal identity apart from owner
e.g., Diversity Heating and Plumbing James Schuster Jerry Schuster
General Partnershipeasy to form
two or more people run a business for profitno formalitiesunlimited personal liabilityjoint liability on contracts and debtsmay continue after death of partnershould have written partnership agreement
Limited Partnershipstatutory creationmust have at least one general partner and
one limited partnerlimited partner has limited liability, but
cannot participate in management
Corporationstatutory creationmust satisfy legal formalities
e.g., articles of incorporation, bylawsperpetual existencelimited liability of shareholdersfree transferability of shares
S Corporationcan avoid double taxation, butcan have no more than 100 shareholders
all of whom must be individuals, estates or trusts cannot be corporations or partnerships
can have only one class of stockcannot own more than 80% of another
corporation
Limited Liability Companyrelatively new statutory creation (1977)“best of all worlds”members have limited liabilitymembers can participate in managementcan choose to be taxed like a corporation or
like a partnership
Limited Liability Partnershipgenerally available only for professionalsno general partnerpartners are not personally liable for the
debts of the LLP or of other partnerspartners are liable for his/her own
negligence, malpractice, etc.
Piercing the Corporate VeilAlter ego theory
commingling of fundsignoring formalities
Undercapitalizatione.g., Walkovsky v. Carlton
Management of CorporationDirectors
overall control of corporation
Officersappointed by board of directors to run day-to-day
operation of corporation
Shareholdersowners of corporationelect the directors
Shareholder VotingStraight voting
one vote for each share for each director nominee
Cumulative votingpermitted and/or required in some statesnumber of voting shares are multiplied by
number of director positions to be filled percentage required to elect one director (x)
1
1
numdir
x
Duty of LoyaltyA director and officers must act in the best
interests of the corporationPersonal interests must be subordinated to
the interests of the corporationA director or officer may not usurp a
corporate opportunity without full disclosure and right of first refusal to corporation
Conflicts of interest must be fully disclosede.g., Globe Woolen v. Utica Gas & Elect.
(1918)
Duty of CareDirectors and officers must be honest and
use prudent business judgmentThey must use the amount of care that an
ordinarily prudent person would use in similar circumstances
e.g., Bates v. Dresser (1920)
Business Judgment RuleDirectors and officers are protected from
honest mistakes of judgment and poor business decisions
They are protected from “Monday morning quarterbacks”
e.g., New Cokee.g., Shlensky v. Wrigley (1968)