Businessn Mei New

7/29/2019 Businessn Mei New

1/22

1

the company has been reported as $2 million whereas according to calculations done by

Mr. A, the value of this property does not exceed $100,000. The reason given by the


2/22

4

client firm management on reporting the overstated value is that they intend to rent out the

property in near future. The client firm refuses to write down the value of the property and

his superior Mr. B disagrees with him and asks him to leave the problem and issue a clean

report. Mr. A does not comply with the instructions and submits a report pointing out the

overstatement of the balance sheet amount as the difference in the amount is substantial.

The superior takes out the pages submitted by Mr. A from the file, attaches a clean report

and issues a negative evaluation of Mr. As performance. Mr. A is now considering on the

options available to him in this matter. The report will cover an analysis of stakeholder

impact and will explain the course of action Mr. A should take.

Ethical principle - Accounting manipulations and frauds

The area of accounting manipulation is closely related with the field business ethics

and numbers of organizations are sued just because of unethical accounting practices and

using window dressing techniques. Accounting manipulations and accounting frauds are

just playing with the numbers and the accountants through this act can either harm their

own organization or in certain cases they affect the shareholders. The accountants and

individuals that are related with finance department are mainly associated with these types

of frauds. These frauds are deadly for an organization and it negatively affects an

organization in both short and the long run (Wells, 2007). The repute of the organization is

tarnished by these frauds and organizations suffer huge amount of losses because of these

frauds and their customer base are reduced because of this.

In the initial phases when an organization is a private limited company then the


3/22

accountants of this organization can harm them if proper check is not placed on them. They

can change the figures of receipts and in this manner they can harm an organization. Through


4/22

5

overstating the amount of account payable they can cheat an organization. This

cheating can cause problems for the organization and accountants cunningly can

balance the financial statement of an organization.

Another process used by organizations is on a broader scale where they are

advised by the directors and senior officials of the organization to change the figures of

the financial statements. In certain cases they are even pressurized by the shareholders

to change the figures of financial statements so the value of shares rises up. The

organization use window dressing techniques in this scenario. Window dressing

techniques are used by accountants to present the accounts of the company in a

manner that enhances the financial position of an organization (Jones, 2009).

In a broader sense it is described as a form of creative accounting which is used

for flattering the figures of accounts. There are two aspects on which window dressing

are solely based on these two aspects are liquidity and profitability. In the liquidity

aspect the organization hides the diminishing liquidity position of the organization and

the profitability massages the profit figures of organizations. There are different

methods that are used by organization is window dressing their accounts. These

methods are short term borrowing, chasing debtors, including of the intangible assets,

changing the stock valuation policy, sales and lease back and etc (Coenen, 2008).

The famous methods are stock valuation, inclusion of intangible assets, short term borrowing

and depreciation policy. In the stock valuation method the methods used are LIFO, AVCO and FIFO


5/22

(Biegelman & Bartow, 2006). A change in these methods would lead to different figures that are the

reason why accountants use this strategy. The change the figures can affect the closing stock and

impacts the profits of the company and the value of firms assets is


6/22

6

effected by stock in the balance sheet. Similarly, in the inclusion of intangible assets

organizations use non depreciated assets to maintain a strong value of its assets and it

gives a misleading view. Another window dressing approach is used through short term

borrowing and the short term borrowing is made just before the date on which the

balance sheet is drawn. All of these frauds are made just to enhance the performance

of an organization but the process of enhancing the performance is not viable because

organizations are infringing the laws and they are not complying with the ethics of

business. The ethical code of conduct is not followed by organizations and that is the

reason why organization can be successful in the short term but in the longer run these

organizations suffer because they are not complying with the rules of business.

The role of auditors and corporate compliance

Auditors are present in nearly every organization and the role of auditors is to ensure the fact

that organizations financial position and financial reporting is appropriate. The element of fraud

auditing is also used by them which basically are defined as the fact which creates an environment

for the detection of frauds and prevention of frauds in transactions that are on commercial basis

(Singelton & Bologna, 2006). The main goal of these auditors is to ensure corporate compliance and

remove fraudulent activities in the organization. The modification of numbers and destruction of

certain records are some of the examples of basic frauds conducted by accountants. Auditors check

the entire accounts and related financial statement of an organization and the first objectives of a

fraud auditor are to identify the fact that whether a certain level of discrepancy is present in the

accounts or not. Then the auditor checks the element of human error present in the accounts. Fraud

auditors check the tone in the entire organization


7/22

7

and he/she ultimately devises a corporate code of conduct for the organizations financial

policies. These auditors inspect the normal course of business of the organization.

As far as auditing is concerned there are basically two types of audits in an

organization. These two types are internal audit and external audit. The internal audit is

basically conducted by the organization itself and for external audits certain auditors are

hired from auditing firms to check the corporate compliance of the organization.

Besides changing the figures and deleting the accounting records another issue arises

which is related to disclosure requirement and certain organization dont disclose their entire

financial statements and they hide them from their shareholders and present a better picture.

For fulfilling the disclosure requirements and to create corporate compliance a law was passed

which is known as SOX (U.S Congress, 2002). The main purpose of this act was to ensure the

disclosure requirements and organizations have to fulfill the requirements of this law. This act

was passed because corporate giants like Enron, WorldCom, and Tyco International were

involved in corporate scandals that were based on financial reporting. Although the act has

certain shortfalls like it is working as a label for corporate compliance and those organizations

that have adopted this act are free from corporate frauds and its posses high level of cost that is

the reason why small organization cannot afford this act. However, a detailed compliance and

security policy is devised is this act (Sarbanes Oxley, 2006).

Stakeholder Impact Analysis

In order to perform this analysis, the stakeholders in the case must be identified. There are

three stakeholders who would be directly affected by the outcome. First stake holder is the


8/22

accounting firm, the second stakeholder is the real estate subsidiary of an important client and the

third stake holders are the people responsible for audit. The impact of the audit report on all


9/22

8

three stakeholders is discussed one by one. First let us observe the impact of the amendments

made in the audit report by Mr. B, on the accounting firm. The outcome of this report on the

company would be very helpful in securing the client account for the company but on the other hand

there is a threat to the company as well because when the client company uses the audit report

issued by the company to sell or rent out the property to potential customers, they will be mislead

and sue the accounting firm for the losses incurred due to this report. The company will face a

lawsuit and its reputation will be tarnished as ABC is considered a strong advocate of ethics and

morality especially after strong measures have been taken in ethical and moral standards of audit

firms in the accounting standards as well as the constitution. If the original report submitted by Mr. A

was issued to the client the most drastic impact it would have is that the accounting firm could lose

the client but retain its image of a firm which gives value to ethical and moral standards. Now the

affects of this report on the second stakeholder which is the subsidiary of the client company is

discussed. If the clean report is issued the client company would not have any problems regarding

the proper disclosure of this amount as the overstated amount is not substantial in respect of the

companys consolidated financial statements but the amount is substantial in the financial statement

of the subsidiary as it has a 7 percent impact on the net income of the subsidiary. If the clean report

is issued the task of selling or renting out the property would be much easier for the subsidiary. The

same legal problems would be faced by the company in case of material losses to the buyers who

would file for damages due to misrepresentation. However, if the original report by Mr. A is issued, it

would be difficult for the management of the company to sell or rent out the property or even take

out a loan by mortgaging this property. There would be no significant positive impact on the client

company but it could avoid any future litigation from the potential buyers or tenants of the property.

The


10/22

9

company could also avoid any future external audit anomalies if the values reported on the

financial statements are accurate and truthful. The third and the last stakeholder of the scenario

is Mr. A himself because if the clean report is submitted he will be the first person to face the

lawsuit as he was directly responsible for auditing the financial statements of the subsidiary.

The positive impact for him would that his one year promotion would be guaranteed if the client

account is secured solely by the accounting firm. The original audit report submitted by Mr. A

would have resulted in the accounting firms loss of the client account.

Influence of Organization Culture

Organizational culture plays an important role in the decision making and different

strategic decisions are taken with respect to the prevalent culture of the organization. In

the similar manner it can be said that organizational culture is important in both the short

and the long run. The culture of the organization incorporates the norms and rules of the

organization. Furthermore, it can be said that when an organization is making ethical

decision making then in this scenario culture of that organization plays an important role.

Researchers and strategist actually believe that an organization culture can be considered

as a proactive culture when it incorporates all the elements of ethical decision making in

both the short and the long run (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2000 pp. 113-141). In the

similar manner it can also be said that when the decision making is free from the menaces

of bribery, red tapping, harassment then an organization can prosper in both the short and

the long run. In the similar an organization that does not focuses on the culture and just

focus on the primary aspect of profit making might suffer in the long run.

Therefore, it can be clearly said that the influence of organizational culture is huge on the


11/22

organizations decision making. In the scenario of the case it can be said that Mr. A is facing a


12/22

10

dilemma regarding ethical considerations in ABC Company. The supervisor Mr. B has

actually changed his report and awarded the client non-qualified. However, the ethical

analysis actually depicts that this organization is a qualified company because it is not

fulfilling the ethical code of conduct and the client is focusing on the faulty accounting

practices. That is reason why Mr. A is quite confused about the situation and what strategy

he should opt. Mr. B (supervisor) has actually implemented this scenario because the ABC

company can progress in this aspect when they award a tag of non-qualified to the client.

This situation depicts the organizational culture and it shows that this organization is

working on unethical practices because for the attainment of profits they can opt for

unethical business practices. The organizational culture actually defines the norms of an

organization and the norms that are present in ABC Company actually depicts that they are

reluctant to ethical implications and it can be easily predicted that since the culture of this

organization is not ethically enriched that is the reason why it can be easily predicted that

the directors of the company would go with Mr. B and they would opt for his policies.

Thus, it can be said that organizational culture of ABC Company is not

appropriate and that is the reason why this culture is creating problems for Mr. A in

both the short and the long run. Furthermore, the dilemma in this scenario is that what

should Mr. A opt for his personal opinions about ethics or he should opt for the

performance of the company which is due to unethical practices.

Influence of Ethics / Compliance Programs


13/22

The development and implementation of an ethics program is not only crucial for

organizational success but it also proves to be effective in various human resource issues. The


14/22

11

ethics and compliance to ethics program involves a variety of stages which are

comprehensively designed and developed by the company management. It is to be understood

clearly that the ethics and compliance program is not just a code of ethics or code of conduct

but comprises of a variety of elements. The elements in an ethics and compliance program are

lucid organizational values, ethical strategies and ethical goals for decision making purposes,

ethical policies and procedure for implementation of programs, measurement mechanism for

effectiveness of the ethical programs, reward structures in ethical behaviors, guidelines for

implementation of ethical decision making, implementation of ethical training programs, support

programs for implementation of ethical policies and convergence of employee values and

corporate values. There are several benefits of implementing an ethics and compliance

program in an organization which include the loyalty of customers, reduced ethical meltdowns,

increased employee loyalty and productivity, improvement in sales, avoidance and reduction in

penalties and fines, decrease in opposition from various circles of the society, increased

financial performance and decrease in ethical incidents (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2000).

The ethics and compliance program of ABC organization would greatly impact the

decision made by Mr. A in regards to the current ethical dilemma. If the ethical and compliance

program is implemented effectively in ABC Company then Mr. A would have no difficulty in

arriving at a conclusion in the current case and could make a decision on whether to report the

ethical misconduct of Mr. B to proper management personnel. If there is in fact an ethical and

compliance program implemented in the company Mr. A would not even have to worry about the

incident happening in the fist place as a strong ethical program would discourage any unethical

behavior by personnel whether old or new. If the management applies an effective ethics and

compliance programs all employees would be properly trained in dealing with ethical issues and


15/22

12

making proper decisions in ethical dilemmas such as the current situation. In the absence of

such a program employees would be motivated to indulge into unethical behavior without any

check and balances for their personal benefits. Mr. A issued a qualified report for the client who

had overstated the value of one of its assets on the balance sheet but Mr. As supervisor

replaced the previous report with a non qualified report and made negative comments on the

report which were quite damaging for Mr. As career. As a proper ethics and compliance

program has not been implemented in the organization Mr. A is confused about the situation

and what to do in this regard. He must now make a decision based on his own interpretation of

ethical misconduct and moral actions. If a comprehensive ethics and compliance program was

implemented in the organization then Mr. A would not face any difficulties in making a decision

instantly regarding the current situation and in an ethical program a proper channel would have

been available to Mr. A in respect of the current ethical dilemma.

Influence of Rewards and Discipline

Rewards play a very important role in a persons decisions in the workplace. There are two

types of rewards for employees in an organization which are intrinsic rewards and extrinsic rewards.

Extrinsic rewards are money oriented whereas intrinsic rewards are esteem oriented. The extrinsic

rewards include benefits such as salary increments, bonuses and special cash rewards on

achievement. The intrinsic rewards are more esteem oriented and focus on a persons esteem

needs rather than cash rewards. These rewards include promotions, acknowledgement in front of

peers, performance appraisal and appreciation in front of others. Employees of a company are

highly motivated with both of these rewards in different situations. The discipline in an organizational

environment entails that all employees and personnel adhere to the rules,


16/22

13

policies and procedures implemented in the organization. Several companies have discipline

policies which impose penalties on employees who do not concur with or follow the policies.

Employees usually make decisions which provide them with rewards and provide safety form

disciplinary action. Following the ethical code of conduct may also bring intrinsic rewards and

save employees from penalties and punishments. Alternatively when an ethical code of conduct

is not effectively implemented in an organization, employees may make decisions which are

unethical or immoral for gaining extrinsic or intrinsic rewards without fear of any penalties being

imposed (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2000 pp. 141-164).

In the current situation As supervisor has replaced the original qualified report with a un

qualified report for the benefit of the client which could result in confirmation of the clients

account to the company and both A and his supervisor could get rewards after the confirmation

of the account. Mr. A would also get promoted to a higher level in the organization if the client

signs a contract for future services. As ABC Company is more profit oriented and although an

ethical code of conduct is present in the company but it is not implemented quite effectively.

The present scenario would motivate any person in place of Mr. A but he has quite strong

personal ethical values which create a dilemma for him and he is now confused whether to

ignore the actions of his superior and let the unqualified audit report pass on to the superiors or

report the situation to the superiors. If A ignores the matter it may result in rewards for A in the

form of a promotion and if he reports the matter to superiors it may result in failure of acquiring

the clients account which may prove quite beneficial for the company in monetary terms in

future periods of operation. Thus the rewards and discipline culture of an organization impacts

the decisions of a person in an ethical dilemma quite significantly.


17/22

14

Course of Action

The audit report now in the records of ABC does not have As name as the report

submitted by him was removed by Mr. B and a negative evaluation of his performance and

instead of getting the important one year promotion he faces the threat of being removed of

his position from the accounting firm. The options available to A include leaving the matter as

it is and not reporting it to anyone; he has the right to take this matter to his partner counselor

or personnel department. He personally feels that he should report this matter to an

independent review board but a board like this is inexistent in ABC.

A is a person who strongly believes in the ethical and moral duties of an auditor and

strictly abides by them. He had discussed the report released by Senator Lee Metcalf which

covered the biasness of accounting firms towards their clients with various partners of the firm

and got the impression that the partners strictly believed in the ethical and moral

representation of clients. It should also be noted that it has become more important for

auditors to follow the code of ethics especially after the implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act which requires the auditors to strictly follow the code of ethics under section 103 (U.S

Congress, 2002). This was the reason ABC had its reputation of setting high standards of


18/22

ethics during the auditing process of different companies. This indicates that if A discusses the

matter with one of the partners, some action might be taken in respect of the situation.

In order to provide a course of action we must compare the benefits and shortcomings of

the options available to A. If A selects the first option and does not report the incident to anyone


19/22

15

there would be no benefit to him but the company may benefit in case the client account is

acquired exclusively. The first option holds many disadvantages for A as the audit report

now includes a negative evaluation of As performance and he is responsible for the

reliability of the report. In case of any litigation he would be solely responsible for the

consequences and both the negative evaluation and legal issue could jeopardize his

position at the firm. The second option entails that Mr. A reports this situation to a partner,

the benefit of this plan would be that the original audit report is issued and action is taken to

ensure that code of ethics is strictly followed in future. The disadvantage of this option

could cause the client company to cancel its account with the firm. If A is pushed hard to

amend the report or do nothing about it he can go to the Public Company Accounting

Oversight Board which was established with the enactment of the Sarbanes Oxley Act.

Provisions have been made in the act to protect whistleblowers and it has been clarified

any retribution towards whistleblowers will not be accepted (Kleckner & Jackson, 2004).

Conclusion

From the analysis of the whole case and the ethical issues involved the viable

option is that Mr. A report this matter to a partner counselor as this option is more

beneficial for his career and the profession of auditing also demands that code of ethics

be followed and financial information be disclosed appropriately in a transparent

manner. Personally A is also very inclined towards the code of ethics and morality as

he thoroughly studied the code of AICPA for his CPA exam. If the last option does not

work he can eventually go to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.


20/22

16

Reference List

Biegelman, M., & Bartow, T. (2006). Executive Roadmap to Fraud Prevention and

InternalControls: Creating a Culture of Compliance. Wiley.

Coenen, T. (2008). Essential of Corporate Fraud. Wiley.

Ferrell, O., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2000). Business Ethics. Houghton Mifflin Company .

Jones, M. (2009). Creative Accounting, Fraud and International Accounting

Scandals. John Wiley and Sons.

Kleckner, P., & Jackson, C. (2004, June). Sarbanes-Oxley and Whistle-blower

Protections. Retrieved May 20, 2009, from nysscpa.org:


21/22

http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2004/604/perspectives/p14.htm

Sarbanes Oxley. (2006). Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance. Retrieved December 11,

2009, from Soxlaw.com: http://www.soxlaw.com/

Singelton, T., & Bologna, J. (2006). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. Wiley.

U.S Congress. (2002). Sarbanes Oxley Act 2002. Washington: U.S Congress.

Wells, J. (2007). Corporate Fraud Handbook. Wiley.


22/22

17

P

D

F

to

W

or

d
http://pdfonline.blogspot.com/http://pdfonline.blogspot.com/http://pdfonline.blogspot.com/http://pdfonline.blogspot.com/http://pdfonline.blogspot.com/http://pdfonline.blogspot.com/http://pdfonline.blogspot.com/http://pdfonline.blogspot.com/http://pdfonline.blogspot.com/http://pdfonline.blogspot.com/

Date post:	03-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	rahul-girdhar
View:	216 times
Download:	0 times

Businessn Mei New

Documents