+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Busting Myths Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

Busting Myths Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

Date post: 14-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: odessa
View: 39 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Busting Myths Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results. James Beckley Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. Common Myths About Volunteers. Volunteer means free Volunteer means poorly funded Volunteer means poor quality/quantity Volunteer means limited resources (e.g. lab access). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
22
Busting Myths Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results James Beckley Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
Transcript
Page 1: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

Busting Myths Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

James BeckleyVirginia Department of Environmental Quality

Page 2: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

Common Myths About VolunteersVolunteer means freeVolunteer means poorly

fundedVolunteer means poor

quality/quantityVolunteer means limited

resources (e.g. lab access)

Page 3: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

Busting The Myths

In September 2012, DEQ conducted an online survey of non-DEQ monitoring groups

20 question survey designed to identify resource needs and contribution levels from these organizations

34 organizations responded

Page 4: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

What Term Best Describes The Water Quality Monitoring Group You Belong To?

Citizen Volunteer- 15

College/University- 7

Federal Government- 5

Non Profit/NGO- 5

Local Government- 2Citiz

en V

olunte

er

Colleg

e/Univ

ersity

Federa

l Gov

ernmen

t

Non Prof

it/ NGO

Local

Govern

ment

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Res

pons

es

Page 5: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

How Many Sites Are Monitored By Your Group In A Year?

Values ranged from 1 to 180

880 total sites reported in survey

Average number of sites monitored per group was 27

Page 6: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

Which Parameters Does Your Water Quality Monitoring Group Sample For?

Field parameters/ DO, pH, Temp- 25

Bacteria/ E coli- 22

Benthic Macroinvertebrates- 19

Nutrients (N, P)- 15

Water clarity/Turbidity- 13

Other- 9Fie

ld Pa

ramete

rs

Bacteri

a/ E co

li

Benthi

c Macr

oinve

rtebrat

es

Nutrients

(N, P

)

Water C

larity

/ Turbidi

tyOther

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Res

pons

es

Page 7: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

Does Your Monitoring Group Drop Off Samples To A Laboratory For Testing?

No- 22

Yes- 1222

12

Samples not dropped off to lab

Samples dropped off to lab

Page 8: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

If Yes, Is The Laboratory Operated By The Monitoring Group Or A Contracted Laboratory?

Lab operated by a monitoring group- 8

Contracted lab- 4

Laboratory Operated by Monitoring Group

Contracted Laboratory0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Res

pons

es

Page 9: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

What Is Your Group’s Primary Source Of Income To Cover Operating Costs?

Budget Allocation- 10

Grants/ Endowment- 10

Donation- 5

No Funding Source- 5

Membership Dues- 2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Res

pons

es

Page 10: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

How Much Does The Primary Source Of Income Cover Operating Expenses?

100%-12

90%- 4

80%- 3

70%- 6

60%- 3

<50%- 5

Percent Funding Of Total Budget

Res

pons

es

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% <50%0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Page 11: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

What Is The Secondary Source Of Income To Cover Monitoring Costs?

No Funding source- 9

Grants/ Endowment- 7

Budget Allocation- 3

Donations- 3

Membership Dues- 2

Selling Services- 2

Other- 4*

* Includes 2 responses for donating personal funds or volunteering time

No fund

ing so

urce

Grants/

Endowmen

t

Budget

Allcoa

tion

Donatio

ns

Membe

rship Due

s

Sellin

g serv

ices

Other0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Res

pons

es

Page 12: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

How Much Does The Secondary Source Of Income Cover Monitoring Expenses?

50%- 240%- 030%- 720%- 510%- 60%- 9

Res

pons

es

Percent Funding Of Total Budget50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Page 13: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

How Many Are Paid Positions, Average Number of Hours Worked and Salary?

Average paid staff per group= 1.2

Average monthly hours worked per paid staff= 37.2 hours

Average monthly salary for paid staff = $898.38 ($24.15/ average)

Average yearly salary per paid staff = $10,780.56

Average yearly salary for paid staff per group = $12,936.67

Page 14: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

How Many Are Unpaid Volunteers and Average Number Of Volunteer Hours?

Average number of volunteers per group= 14.2

Average number of monthly hours per unpaid volunteer= 9.4 hours

Average equivalent monthly salary for unpaid position (assume $22.60/hr) = $212.44http://www.independentsector.org/volunteer_time

Average equivalent yearly salary per volunteer= $1,996.94

Average equivalent yearly salary for volunteers per group= $28,356.55

Page 15: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

Estimated Annual Expenses To Perform Water Quality Monitoring

$0-$1

,000

$1,00

0-$5,0

00

$5,00

0-$20

,000

$20,0

00-$5

0,000

$50,0

00-$1

00,00

0

$100

,000-$

300,0

00

>$300

,000

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Res

pons

es

Page 16: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

What Is The Primary Reason For The Group To Monitor Water Quality ?

Identify areas of good or bad water quality- 13

Education and outreach of the public-10

Response to a specific concern- 3

Advocate for the environment- 2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Res

pons

es

Page 17: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

Who Is The Intended Audience For The Water Quality Data Collected By The Group?

Government officials- 26

General public- 25

Members of the group- 24

Academic peers- 11

Local Partners/Schools- 4Govern-ment of-

ficials

General Public

Member of the group

Academic peers

Local Partners/Schools

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Res

pons

es

Page 18: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

How Is The Data Communicated?Online Database/

Smartphone Application- 19

Newsletter/Report- 17

Power Point/Meetings- 12

Research Paper- 9

E-mail/Website- 5

Radio/Podcast- 1

Other- 3 Databa

se App

licati

on

Newsle

tter/R

eport

Power

Point/M

eeting

s

Researc

h Pap

er

E-mail

/Web

site

Radio,

Podcas

tOthe

r0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Res

pons

es

Page 19: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

Does Your Group Submit Water Quality Data To The Virginia DEQ?

Yes- 23

No- 9 24

8Groups submitting data to Virginia DEQ

Groups not submitting data to Virginia DEQ

Page 20: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

If Yes, is Any of the Submitted Data Considered Level III by the VADEQ?

Yes- 18

No- 4

Do not know- 4 17

3

4YesNoDo not know

Page 21: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

Is Your Group Interested In Submitting Data To The Virginia DEQ?

Yes- 31

No- 1

Yes No0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Res

pons

es

Page 22: Busting  Myths  Volunteer Monitoring Survey Results

Recommended