+ All Categories
Home > Documents > BV_Naval Rules

BV_Naval Rules

Date post: 26-Dec-2014
Category:
Upload: ihecu
View: 470 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
36
Bureau Veritas Naval rules ISTANBUL October, 4 th 2010 Yves LE GAL Manager Naval business
Transcript
Page 1: BV_Naval Rules

Bureau Veritas Naval rules

ISTANBULOctober, 4th 2010

Yves LE GAL Manager Naval business

Page 2: BV_Naval Rules

2Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

1 BACKGROUND

2 SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS

3 KEY ELEMENTS

SUMMARY

4 IMO CONVENTIONS

5 CLASSIFICATION AREA

Page 3: BV_Naval Rules

3Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

BACKGROUND

� Organisation of Defense in France

�Our Experience� The Beginning

Page 4: BV_Naval Rules

4Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

������������������������������������������������

� � �� � �� ��� � � �� � �� ��� � � �� � �� ��� � � �� � �� ���

� � � �� � �� � �� �� � �� � � �� � �� � �� �� � �� � � �� � �� � �� �� � �� � � �� � �� � �� �� � �

� � ����� � � �� � �� � ��� � ����� � � �� � �� � ��� � ����� � � �� � �� � ��� � ����� � � �� � �� � ��

THE BEGINNING – STEERING COMMITTEEBACKGROUND : Organisation of Defense in France

����� ���� ��� ������ ���� ��� ������ ���� ��� ������ ���� ��� ���������� � � � �� � �� � � � �� � �� � � � �� � �� � � � �� � �

� � � � � � � �

������ �� ! ������� �� ! ������� �� ! ������� �� ! �� �! ��� �� �! ��� �� �! ��� �� �! ��� �" � �� � ��! �� ! � ����" � �� � ��! �� ! � ����" � �� � ��! �� ! � ����" � �� � ��! �� ! � ����

� " ���� � ��! �� ! �� � �� " ���� � ��! �� ! �� � �� " ���� � ��! �� ! �� � �� " ���� � ��! �� ! �� � �

� � " ��� � ��� �� # � �� � " ��� � ��� �� # � �� � " ��� � ��� �� # � �� � " ��� � ��� �� # � �

Page 5: BV_Naval Rules

5Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

THE BEGINNING – STEERING COMMITTEEBACKGROUND : Organisation of Defense in France

•President of Republic is responsible for

• Defense Policy

• Decisions in case of emergency situations

•Chief of armies reports directly to him

• Chief of Navy –is responsible for the

• definition of Navy needs including technical specifications for new equipment

• operational evaluation of prototypes

• use of equipment by the navy forces

•Minister of Defense –under supervision of Prime Minister- is responsible through

• DGA of :

• prospective analysis of needs

• bringing proper equipment to the forces

• defining and monitoring technology and industrial strategies

Page 6: BV_Naval Rules

6Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

BACKGROUND : Request for BV involvement

•Starting several years ago, but in a more comprehensive way for military units from early 2000:

• Navy –expressed the wish to involve classification society (BV) to

• better comply with Solas, Marpol,…

• use more « commonly used in Merchant Marine» equipment and technologies

• define «commonly agreed technical standards » for discussions with DGA, Yards, …

Later:

• provide structured process for regular inspection for vessels in service

• DGA confirmed the wish of French Navy and emphasized the interest for the use of BV

• to benefit more, starting at design stage, from experience of non military best standards;

• allowing easier purchase, and more competitive offers from yards and equipment suppliers;

• with understanding miltary specificities (crewing, weapons, …) through « adapted » rules

• DCN understood that BV could bring:

• benefit through good guidance for design, and more « common » equipment requirements,

• more clarity in all discussions between DGA and yards military or non military.

Page 7: BV_Naval Rules

7Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

BV EXPERIENCE

� INVOLVED IN NAVAL SHIP BUILDING SINCE 1978Patrol ships - Watch frigates - Landing ships- Replenishment tankers – Vehicle carriers

� STEEL SHIP RULES APPLIED TO NAVY SHIPS

Parts of BV & IMO rules were applied to French navy ships

� STRONG CO-OPERATION WITH

THE FRENCH NAVY/MINISTRY OF DEFENSE (DGA)

At pre- design stage

After building contract signed

-approval of drawings

-survey of buildings

-attendance to tests, trials and delivery

After delivery follow up of vessels with regular inspections, reports,…

New request from DGA: certification/conformity assessment for vessels builtabroad.

Confidentialiy procedure is strictly followed in here above processes.

BACKGROUND : BV Experience

Page 8: BV_Naval Rules

8Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

BV EXPERIENCE

� List of vessels duly classed by BV during recent years:

2000-2001: 1 research ship (80m) for France, built at Alstom Leroux Naval,

2001-2005: 2 BPC landing platform helicopter & landing ship docks (200 m),

built at Chantiers de l’Atlantique & DCN Brest

2003-2004: 1 research ship (105m) for France, built at Alstom Leroux Naval,

2003-2004: 1 research ship (95m) for France, built at Royal Niestern Sanders,

2003-2004: 1 research ship (56m) for France, built at SOCARENAM, France

2005-2015: 11 frigates (130m) for France, FREMM project, built at DCNS Lorient,

2006-2007: 2 patrol vessels (40m) for France, built at SOCAREMAN, France

2007-2009: 1patrol vessels (85 m) for DCNS(demonstrator), built at DCNS Lorient,

2009-2010: 1 BPC(No3) landing platform helicopter & landing ship docks (200 m),

built at Chantiers de l’Atlantique & DCN Brest, France

BACKGROUND : BV Experience in France

Page 9: BV_Naval Rules

9Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

BV EXPERIENCE RECENT YEARS

2004-2006: 1 Military RoRo (160m) for Egypt, built at Alexandria Shipyard, Egypt

2005-2010: 4 Patrol ship (94m) BAM, for Spain, built at IZAR San Fernando, Spain

2007-2009: 21 patrol vessels (30m) for Algeria, built at OCEA, France

2007-2009: 4 patrol vessels (20m) for Tunisia, built at RAIDCO, France

2008-2010: 1patrol vessels (70 m) for Morocco, built at STX Lorient, France

2009-2012: 1 frigates (130m) for Morocco, FREMM design, built at DCNS Lorient, France

2009-2010: 2 patrol vessels (66m) for the Romanian police, built at Damen Galati, Romania

BACKGROUND : BV Experience Outside of France

Page 10: BV_Naval Rules

10Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

BV Mili SteeringCommittee

BV Mili SteeringCommittee

Subdivision

Stability

Scantling

Automation

Power

Propulsion

Combat

Strengthening

Shock

NBC etc

Environmental

Material

12 working groups for each specific Technical area over 2 years

THE BEGINNING – STEERING COMMITTEEBACKGROUND MILITARY RULES DEVELOPMENT

Page 11: BV_Naval Rules

11Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

BV 2000

Adaptation Deletio

n

Additional naval reqts

InternationalConventions

BVMilitary Rules

BVMilit

ary

Rules

THE BEGINNING – BUILDING BLOCKBACKGROUND MILITARY RULES DEVELOPMENT

Page 12: BV_Naval Rules

12Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS

Page 13: BV_Naval Rules

13Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

Part A : principles and notations

NEWBUILDING

NC ���� HULL ���� MACH Construction mark

Frigate Service notation

Unrestricted navigation Navigation notation

���� AUT-QAS Automation notation

����AVM-APM Propulsion redundancy notation

���� CLEAN-SHIP Pollution notation

���� REFSTORE Refrigerated stores notation

SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS

Page 14: BV_Naval Rules

14Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

� Survey Regime is not constrained by International Conventions

� Survey Cycle over 6 years (against 5 yrs for merchant ships)

� Use of planned maintenance scheme taken into consideration

� Option to qualify chief engineer/naval technicians for survey of engineering systems

Part A : Survey regime

SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS

Page 15: BV_Naval Rules

15Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

MAIN SPECIFICITIES

� STABILITY - SURVIVABILITY

� HULL GIRDER

� PROPULSION

� ELECTRICITY

� AUTOMATION

� SAFETY

� ADDITIONAL NOTATIONS

BV MILITARY SHIPS RULESSPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS

Page 16: BV_Naval Rules

16Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

STABILITY STABILITY -- SURVIVABILITYSURVIVABILITY

� Stronger wind conditions than for merchant ships

� Subdivision determined by damage stability criteria

� Max angle of heel larger than for merchant ships

� Additional notation FFS Flooding Fighting Systems

BV MILITARY SHIPS RULESSPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS

Page 17: BV_Naval Rules

17Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

• Yielding check : increase of vertical wave bending moment by 10%( only for « frigate » and for « aircraft carrier » )

• Ultimate strength : increase of PSF* from 1.1 to 1.2

• Fatigue criteria for design life over 30 years ( up to 40 years )

• Minimum thickness for bottom plating of aircraft carriers

• Water impact considered on underside of sponsoons for aircraftcarrrier ( fore part )

HULL GIRDER STRENGTHHULL GIRDER STRENGTH

* PSF : partial safety factor

SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS

Page 18: BV_Naval Rules

18Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

PROPULSIONPROPULSION

Insertions :

- continual operation with a partially flooded machinery compartment

- increase of admissible heel angles for damage stability verifications

- constraints with respect to NBC openings protection

- Increase of safety coefficients for gearboxes

- More detailed calculation of propellers + cavitation requirements

- Lateral vibration calculations of main propulsion shafting required

SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS

Page 19: BV_Naval Rules

19Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

BV MILITARY SHIPS RULES

ELECTRICITY ELECTRICITY

� Additional requirements for weapon systems operation.

Compliance with Stanag 1008

� Possibility of no emergency generator provided enough

redundancy level of power generation

� Essential services include combat systems.

� Dangerous area requirements for aircraft spaces and aviation

refuelling stations.

SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS

Page 20: BV_Naval Rules

20Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

AUTOMATIONAUTOMATION

Principal consideration :Centralized system with high automation level

Insertions- Requirement for single fault tolerant network

- AUT- QAS & AUT- IAS close to merchant ship rules

- AVM - APM compulsory for Frigates

- AVM - DPS compulsory for aircraft carriers

SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS

Page 21: BV_Naval Rules

21Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

FIRE SAFETYFIRE SAFETY

� Increase of passive fire protection level

� Rules for ship evacuation :

� Inspired from Solas cargo ship for Frigate

�Inspired from Solas passenger ship for Aircraft carrier

� Management of smokes & hot gas

� Autonomy of safety zones (detection, alarms, fighting)

� Autonomy of vulnerability zone, versus power supply.

SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS

Page 22: BV_Naval Rules

22Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

� Automation : AUT-QAS, AUT-IAS, AUT-PORT

� Machinery redundancy : AVM-APM, AVM-DPS, AVM-IPS x(V)

� Comfort : COMF-Noise, COMF-Vib

� Flooding fighting systems : FFS

� Fire protection : Fire

� Prevention of pollution : CLEANSHIP, CLEANSHIP SUPER

� Monitoring : MON-HULL, MON-SHAFT

� Ship motion : SEA-KEEP

� Bridge ergonomy : SYS-NEQ, SYS-NEQ 1

� VERISTAR : STAR-HULL, STAR-MACH

BV MILITARY SHIPS RULES

Part E : additional notations

SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS

Page 23: BV_Naval Rules

23Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

KEY ELEMENTS

RULES DEVELOPMENT KEY ELEMENTS

Page 24: BV_Naval Rules

24Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

5 PARTS

A : Classification and surveys

B : Hull and stability

C : Machinery, systems, fire protection

D : Service notations : Frigate, Aircraft carrier

E : Additional class notations

NAVAL RULES 2006 CONTENT

RULES ARCHITECTURE

Page 25: BV_Naval Rules

25Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

BV NAVAL RULES EDITIONS

• French version edition June 2002

• English version edition June 2003

• First update : September 2006� Benefit of the experience of the

FREMM project� New chapter for aircraft carrier

• October 2008 AMENDMENTS mainly for aircraft carrier• October 2008 new chapter for Corvettes

Page 26: BV_Naval Rules

26Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

IMO CONVENTIONS

IMO INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION

Page 27: BV_Naval Rules

27Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

� 166 flag states – 60 NGO (consultative) including IACS

� Issue the international conventions applicable by the

flag states when ratified

IMO INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION

Page 28: BV_Naval Rules

28Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

� Load-Line (Franc bord – Stabilité)

� SOLAS (Construction – Équipement – Radio – ISM)

� MARPOL (Machine – Cargaison – Air)

� COLREG (Prévention des collisions)

� STCW (Formation des équipages)

IMO INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION

Page 29: BV_Naval Rules

29Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

� Load-Line (Franc bord – Stabilité)

� COLREG (Prévention des collisions)

� STCW (Formation des équipages)

IMO conventions not covered by classification rules

But nethertheless verified by classification societies

IMO INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION

Page 30: BV_Naval Rules

30Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

� SOLAS Items covered by BV rules

Structural fire protection and escape routes

� Items specifically covered by SOLAS

Life saving appliances

� Davits

� Life boats and life rafts

� Life jackets

Fire fighting and fire protection equipment

Navigation equipment

Radio communication equipment

ISM

IMO SOLAS

Page 31: BV_Naval Rules

31Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

� MARPOL Items covered by BV rules

� Bunkering

� Piping of machinery

� Full compliance with MARPOL in case of additional notation Cleanship

� Items specifically covered by MARPOL

� Sewage

� Garbage

� Air pollution

IMO MARPOL

Page 32: BV_Naval Rules

32Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

CLASSIFICATION AREA

Page 33: BV_Naval Rules

33Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

CLASSIFICATION AREA

Vérifications of safety requirements :

� Hull and hull equipment

� Main and auxiliary engines

� Electrical equipment

� Fire safety and escapes routes

� Stability

Items covered by classification

Page 34: BV_Naval Rules

34Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

Items not covered by classification

Items from owner’s specification

� Paint

� Air conditioning

� Consumption of engines

� performances of the ship

CLASSIFICATION AREA

Page 35: BV_Naval Rules

35Bureau Veritas _ September 2010

ThankThank youyou for for youryourattention attention

NAVAL CLASSIFICATION RULES

Page 36: BV_Naval Rules

Recommended