Bureau Veritas Naval rules
ISTANBULOctober, 4th 2010
Yves LE GAL Manager Naval business
2Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
1 BACKGROUND
2 SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS
3 KEY ELEMENTS
SUMMARY
4 IMO CONVENTIONS
5 CLASSIFICATION AREA
3Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
BACKGROUND
� Organisation of Defense in France
�Our Experience� The Beginning
4Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
������������������������������������������������
� � �� � �� ��� � � �� � �� ��� � � �� � �� ��� � � �� � �� ���
� � � �� � �� � �� �� � �� � � �� � �� � �� �� � �� � � �� � �� � �� �� � �� � � �� � �� � �� �� � �
� � ����� � � �� � �� � ��� � ����� � � �� � �� � ��� � ����� � � �� � �� � ��� � ����� � � �� � �� � ��
THE BEGINNING – STEERING COMMITTEEBACKGROUND : Organisation of Defense in France
����� ���� ��� ������ ���� ��� ������ ���� ��� ������ ���� ��� ���������� � � � �� � �� � � � �� � �� � � � �� � �� � � � �� � �
� � � � � � � �
������ �� ! ������� �� ! ������� �� ! ������� �� ! �� �! ��� �� �! ��� �� �! ��� �� �! ��� �" � �� � ��! �� ! � ����" � �� � ��! �� ! � ����" � �� � ��! �� ! � ����" � �� � ��! �� ! � ����
� " ���� � ��! �� ! �� � �� " ���� � ��! �� ! �� � �� " ���� � ��! �� ! �� � �� " ���� � ��! �� ! �� � �
� � " ��� � ��� �� # � �� � " ��� � ��� �� # � �� � " ��� � ��� �� # � �� � " ��� � ��� �� # � �
5Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
THE BEGINNING – STEERING COMMITTEEBACKGROUND : Organisation of Defense in France
•President of Republic is responsible for
• Defense Policy
• Decisions in case of emergency situations
•Chief of armies reports directly to him
• Chief of Navy –is responsible for the
• definition of Navy needs including technical specifications for new equipment
• operational evaluation of prototypes
• use of equipment by the navy forces
•Minister of Defense –under supervision of Prime Minister- is responsible through
• DGA of :
• prospective analysis of needs
• bringing proper equipment to the forces
• defining and monitoring technology and industrial strategies
6Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
BACKGROUND : Request for BV involvement
•Starting several years ago, but in a more comprehensive way for military units from early 2000:
• Navy –expressed the wish to involve classification society (BV) to
• better comply with Solas, Marpol,…
• use more « commonly used in Merchant Marine» equipment and technologies
• define «commonly agreed technical standards » for discussions with DGA, Yards, …
Later:
• provide structured process for regular inspection for vessels in service
• DGA confirmed the wish of French Navy and emphasized the interest for the use of BV
• to benefit more, starting at design stage, from experience of non military best standards;
• allowing easier purchase, and more competitive offers from yards and equipment suppliers;
• with understanding miltary specificities (crewing, weapons, …) through « adapted » rules
• DCN understood that BV could bring:
• benefit through good guidance for design, and more « common » equipment requirements,
• more clarity in all discussions between DGA and yards military or non military.
7Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
BV EXPERIENCE
� INVOLVED IN NAVAL SHIP BUILDING SINCE 1978Patrol ships - Watch frigates - Landing ships- Replenishment tankers – Vehicle carriers
� STEEL SHIP RULES APPLIED TO NAVY SHIPS
Parts of BV & IMO rules were applied to French navy ships
� STRONG CO-OPERATION WITH
THE FRENCH NAVY/MINISTRY OF DEFENSE (DGA)
At pre- design stage
After building contract signed
-approval of drawings
-survey of buildings
-attendance to tests, trials and delivery
After delivery follow up of vessels with regular inspections, reports,…
New request from DGA: certification/conformity assessment for vessels builtabroad.
Confidentialiy procedure is strictly followed in here above processes.
BACKGROUND : BV Experience
8Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
BV EXPERIENCE
� List of vessels duly classed by BV during recent years:
2000-2001: 1 research ship (80m) for France, built at Alstom Leroux Naval,
2001-2005: 2 BPC landing platform helicopter & landing ship docks (200 m),
built at Chantiers de l’Atlantique & DCN Brest
2003-2004: 1 research ship (105m) for France, built at Alstom Leroux Naval,
2003-2004: 1 research ship (95m) for France, built at Royal Niestern Sanders,
2003-2004: 1 research ship (56m) for France, built at SOCARENAM, France
2005-2015: 11 frigates (130m) for France, FREMM project, built at DCNS Lorient,
2006-2007: 2 patrol vessels (40m) for France, built at SOCAREMAN, France
2007-2009: 1patrol vessels (85 m) for DCNS(demonstrator), built at DCNS Lorient,
2009-2010: 1 BPC(No3) landing platform helicopter & landing ship docks (200 m),
built at Chantiers de l’Atlantique & DCN Brest, France
BACKGROUND : BV Experience in France
9Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
BV EXPERIENCE RECENT YEARS
2004-2006: 1 Military RoRo (160m) for Egypt, built at Alexandria Shipyard, Egypt
2005-2010: 4 Patrol ship (94m) BAM, for Spain, built at IZAR San Fernando, Spain
2007-2009: 21 patrol vessels (30m) for Algeria, built at OCEA, France
2007-2009: 4 patrol vessels (20m) for Tunisia, built at RAIDCO, France
2008-2010: 1patrol vessels (70 m) for Morocco, built at STX Lorient, France
2009-2012: 1 frigates (130m) for Morocco, FREMM design, built at DCNS Lorient, France
2009-2010: 2 patrol vessels (66m) for the Romanian police, built at Damen Galati, Romania
BACKGROUND : BV Experience Outside of France
10Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
BV Mili SteeringCommittee
BV Mili SteeringCommittee
Subdivision
Stability
Scantling
Automation
Power
Propulsion
Combat
Strengthening
Shock
NBC etc
Environmental
Material
12 working groups for each specific Technical area over 2 years
THE BEGINNING – STEERING COMMITTEEBACKGROUND MILITARY RULES DEVELOPMENT
11Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
BV 2000
Adaptation Deletio
n
Additional naval reqts
InternationalConventions
BVMilitary Rules
BVMilit
ary
Rules
THE BEGINNING – BUILDING BLOCKBACKGROUND MILITARY RULES DEVELOPMENT
12Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS
13Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
Part A : principles and notations
NEWBUILDING
NC ���� HULL ���� MACH Construction mark
Frigate Service notation
Unrestricted navigation Navigation notation
���� AUT-QAS Automation notation
����AVM-APM Propulsion redundancy notation
���� CLEAN-SHIP Pollution notation
���� REFSTORE Refrigerated stores notation
SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS
14Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
� Survey Regime is not constrained by International Conventions
� Survey Cycle over 6 years (against 5 yrs for merchant ships)
� Use of planned maintenance scheme taken into consideration
� Option to qualify chief engineer/naval technicians for survey of engineering systems
Part A : Survey regime
SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS
15Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
MAIN SPECIFICITIES
� STABILITY - SURVIVABILITY
� HULL GIRDER
� PROPULSION
� ELECTRICITY
� AUTOMATION
� SAFETY
� ADDITIONAL NOTATIONS
BV MILITARY SHIPS RULESSPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS
16Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
STABILITY STABILITY -- SURVIVABILITYSURVIVABILITY
� Stronger wind conditions than for merchant ships
� Subdivision determined by damage stability criteria
� Max angle of heel larger than for merchant ships
� Additional notation FFS Flooding Fighting Systems
BV MILITARY SHIPS RULESSPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS
17Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
• Yielding check : increase of vertical wave bending moment by 10%( only for « frigate » and for « aircraft carrier » )
• Ultimate strength : increase of PSF* from 1.1 to 1.2
• Fatigue criteria for design life over 30 years ( up to 40 years )
• Minimum thickness for bottom plating of aircraft carriers
• Water impact considered on underside of sponsoons for aircraftcarrrier ( fore part )
HULL GIRDER STRENGTHHULL GIRDER STRENGTH
* PSF : partial safety factor
SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS
18Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
PROPULSIONPROPULSION
Insertions :
- continual operation with a partially flooded machinery compartment
- increase of admissible heel angles for damage stability verifications
- constraints with respect to NBC openings protection
- Increase of safety coefficients for gearboxes
- More detailed calculation of propellers + cavitation requirements
- Lateral vibration calculations of main propulsion shafting required
SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS
19Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
BV MILITARY SHIPS RULES
ELECTRICITY ELECTRICITY
� Additional requirements for weapon systems operation.
Compliance with Stanag 1008
� Possibility of no emergency generator provided enough
redundancy level of power generation
� Essential services include combat systems.
� Dangerous area requirements for aircraft spaces and aviation
refuelling stations.
SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS
20Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
AUTOMATIONAUTOMATION
Principal consideration :Centralized system with high automation level
Insertions- Requirement for single fault tolerant network
- AUT- QAS & AUT- IAS close to merchant ship rules
- AVM - APM compulsory for Frigates
- AVM - DPS compulsory for aircraft carriers
SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS
21Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
FIRE SAFETYFIRE SAFETY
� Increase of passive fire protection level
� Rules for ship evacuation :
� Inspired from Solas cargo ship for Frigate
�Inspired from Solas passenger ship for Aircraft carrier
� Management of smokes & hot gas
� Autonomy of safety zones (detection, alarms, fighting)
� Autonomy of vulnerability zone, versus power supply.
SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS
22Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
� Automation : AUT-QAS, AUT-IAS, AUT-PORT
� Machinery redundancy : AVM-APM, AVM-DPS, AVM-IPS x(V)
� Comfort : COMF-Noise, COMF-Vib
� Flooding fighting systems : FFS
� Fire protection : Fire
� Prevention of pollution : CLEANSHIP, CLEANSHIP SUPER
� Monitoring : MON-HULL, MON-SHAFT
� Ship motion : SEA-KEEP
� Bridge ergonomy : SYS-NEQ, SYS-NEQ 1
� VERISTAR : STAR-HULL, STAR-MACH
BV MILITARY SHIPS RULES
Part E : additional notations
SPECIFIC NAVAL REQUIREMENTS
23Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
KEY ELEMENTS
RULES DEVELOPMENT KEY ELEMENTS
24Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
5 PARTS
A : Classification and surveys
B : Hull and stability
C : Machinery, systems, fire protection
D : Service notations : Frigate, Aircraft carrier
E : Additional class notations
NAVAL RULES 2006 CONTENT
RULES ARCHITECTURE
25Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
BV NAVAL RULES EDITIONS
• French version edition June 2002
• English version edition June 2003
• First update : September 2006� Benefit of the experience of the
FREMM project� New chapter for aircraft carrier
• October 2008 AMENDMENTS mainly for aircraft carrier• October 2008 new chapter for Corvettes
26Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
IMO CONVENTIONS
IMO INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION
27Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
� 166 flag states – 60 NGO (consultative) including IACS
� Issue the international conventions applicable by the
flag states when ratified
IMO INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION
28Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
� Load-Line (Franc bord – Stabilité)
� SOLAS (Construction – Équipement – Radio – ISM)
� MARPOL (Machine – Cargaison – Air)
� COLREG (Prévention des collisions)
� STCW (Formation des équipages)
IMO INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION
29Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
� Load-Line (Franc bord – Stabilité)
� COLREG (Prévention des collisions)
� STCW (Formation des équipages)
IMO conventions not covered by classification rules
But nethertheless verified by classification societies
IMO INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION
30Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
� SOLAS Items covered by BV rules
Structural fire protection and escape routes
� Items specifically covered by SOLAS
Life saving appliances
� Davits
� Life boats and life rafts
� Life jackets
Fire fighting and fire protection equipment
Navigation equipment
Radio communication equipment
ISM
IMO SOLAS
31Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
� MARPOL Items covered by BV rules
� Bunkering
� Piping of machinery
� Full compliance with MARPOL in case of additional notation Cleanship
� Items specifically covered by MARPOL
� Sewage
� Garbage
� Air pollution
IMO MARPOL
32Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
CLASSIFICATION AREA
33Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
CLASSIFICATION AREA
Vérifications of safety requirements :
� Hull and hull equipment
� Main and auxiliary engines
� Electrical equipment
� Fire safety and escapes routes
� Stability
Items covered by classification
34Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
Items not covered by classification
Items from owner’s specification
� Paint
� Air conditioning
� Consumption of engines
� performances of the ship
CLASSIFICATION AREA
35Bureau Veritas _ September 2010
ThankThank youyou for for youryourattention attention
NAVAL CLASSIFICATION RULES