+ All Categories
Home > Documents > By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Date post: 18-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: robyn-oconnor
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Resources Training Staff Equipment (Hardware/Software) Commitment Dedicated Staff Experience Expertise
31
Key IT Strategies May 3 rd , 2012 By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes
Transcript
Page 1: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Key IT StrategiesMay 3rd, 2012

By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes

Page 2: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Project’s Purpose

Henrico County’s Department of Planning would like an analysis of its current initiatives and documentation of current challenges in an effort to illustrate what the department can do to better position itself for the future.

Page 3: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Departmental Assets

Resources• Training• Staff• Equipment (Hardware/Software)

Commitment• Dedicated Staff• Experience• Expertise

Page 4: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Problem Analysis The Department of Planning is facing not

only technological challenges, but human challenges that often accompany the technological aspects: Digital Divide Silo Effect Buy-In

Page 5: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Digital Divide

A knowledge divide occurs when the digital divide has moved beyond inequalities in access and resources, and instead involves a lack of information about technology

Page 6: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Silo Effect Silos are groups of

employees that tend to work as autonomous units.  They tend to promote resistance to the integration of work across units, thus limiting ideas and collaborative efforts, which could enhance work processes and efficiencies.

To overcome the silo effect:

De-compartmentalize business processes

Improve Executive Coordination Standardize Processes Improve Communication

Page 7: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Buy-In

Buy-In Achieves: Consistency Trust Commitment

Buy-In needs to be organization-wide

Page 8: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Potential Consequences of Not Maximizing Efficiency and Effectiveness

Causes

• Stove-piped or silo process structures• Lack of training• Lack of IT capabilities (infrastructure, software, personnel)

• Resistance to change• Poor communication and coordination between divisions/staff

Compensatory Behavior

• Hire additional staff• Increase work hours for existing staff• Shift work allocation/priorities based on immediate need, (i.e.) forego performance of more routine functions or eliminate steps in the process

Results

• Organization is more vulnerable to errors• Staff burn-out – can lead to more significant health issues

• Lost productivity (time and money that could be directed to other purposes)

• Potential loss of customers • Lost organizational performance opportunities (lost business/revenue)

Page 9: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Methodology

Meth0ds• Literature Review

• Stakeholder Analysis

• Interviews• Electronic Survey

Page 10: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Literature Review

Strategic Planning in Local Government

Change Business

Processes E-Government Going Paperless

Page 11: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Stakeholder Analysis

Page 12: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Division Manager Interviews

4 Division Interviews: Comprehensive

Planning Design and Review Zoning Appeals Planning Systems

Structured questionnaire Willingness to change Daily

responsibilities/tasks Use of technology

Page 13: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Electronic Survey’s Purpose

To assess the Department of Planning’s information technology: Preferences Capabilities Challenges

To solicit input from organizational members beyond the organization’s leadership.

Page 14: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Question 1

FileNet

GIS

TideMark

26.32%

2.63%

31.58%

10.53%

21.05%

15.79%

63.16%

73.68%

50.00%

Figure 1 - Most Widely Used Technologies, Systems and/or Databases

Yes, I use this daily No, I do not use this Sometimes, but not daily

N = 38Question 1: Which of the following technologies, systems and/or databases do you use to perform the Department of Planning work processes? A complete list of technologies, systems, and/or databases can be found within this report's appendices.

Page 15: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Question 2

Daily Weekly Monthly Never No Response

47.37%

31.58%

5.26% 10.53% 5.26%

Figure 2 - FileNet Usage Rates

N = 38Question 2: Do you access plan files/information/data using FileNet? If ypu answered "yes", how often do you access files/information/data electronically? If you answered "no", please provide the main reasons as to why you do not access plan files/information/data electronically.

Page 16: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Question 3

GIS

FileNet

TideMark

Microsoft Office Suite

63.16%

55.26%

44.74%

55.26%

Figure 3 - Technologies, Software, Systems and/or Databases That Make Work Easier

N = 38Question 3: What current technologies, software programs, systems and/or databases make your job easier? A complete list of technologies can be found within this report's appendices.

Page 17: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Question 4

Provide Training

Increase User Friendliness

Establish Buy-In

No Response

Acquire Better Hardware/Software

Enhance Information

Foster Greater Integration

36.84%

21.05%

15.79%

15.79%

13.16%

2.63%

2.63%

Figure 4 - What would need to be different?

N = 38Question 4: What would need to be different for you to use the tools you do not currently use?

Page 18: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Question 5

Provide Training

Establish Buy-In

Enhance Information

Acquire Better Hardware/Software

Foster Greater Integration

Increase User Friendliness

No Response

23.68%

39.47%

26.32%

10.53%

18.42%

15.79%

15.79%

Figure 5 - What Can Move Technology Forward?

N = 38Question 5: What are ways the Department of Planning can do things differently in the future to move technology forward?

Page 19: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Needs Comparison

Foster Greater Integration

Enhance Information

Acquire Better Hardware/Software

No Response

Establish Buy-In

Increase User-Friendliness

Provide Training

0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00%

Figure 6 – Themes Compared in Questions 4 and 5

Question 4Question 5

N = 38Question 4: What would need to be different for you to use the tools you do not currently use?Question 5: What are ways the Department of Planning can do things differently in the future to move technology forward?

Page 20: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Question 6

Male45%

Female29%

Prefer not to say26%

Figure 7 - Gender

N = 38Question 6: Gender.

Page 21: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Question 7

Less than 1 year3%

1 to 5 years11%

6 to 10 years29%

11 to 15 years16%

16 to 20 years3%

More than 20 years5%

Prefer not to say34%

Figure 8 – Tenure at the Department of Planning

N = 38Question 7: Tenure at the Department of Planning.

Page 22: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Question 8

20 to 29 years old8%

30 to 39 years old18%

40 to 49 years old11%

50 to 59 years old21%60 to 69 years old

3%

Prefer not to say39%

Figure 9 - Age

N = 38Question 8: Age.

Page 23: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

4 Key Focus Areas

Establish Buy-In

ProvideTraining

Enhance Informatio

n

Foster Greater

Integration

Figure 10 – 4 Key Focus Areas

Page 24: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Survey Results as Compared to the Literature

The literature suggests several themes that develop throughout the survey results:

Themes• Buy-In• Resistance to

Change• Leadership

Sponsoring Change

• Increasing Quantity of Electronic Content

• Training

Page 25: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Recommendations

• Pilot Projects

• Virtual Communication

• eGovernment

Page 26: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Recommendations

Continuity of Operations Plan

Consequences

Page 27: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Recommendations

• Public Value

• Gantt Chart

Page 28: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Gantt Chart

Page 29: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Recommendations

Training

Internship Program

Page 30: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Recommendations

Integration

Complete High Priority IT Initiatives

Page 31: By Jessica Zielonis, Jonathan Wyss, Sharon Sykes, Samantha Kenny and Leigh Estes.

Questions or Comments?


Recommended