Byron, Units 1 and 2, Updated Final Safety Analysis … › docs › ML1300 › ML13004A055.pdfSIrE...

IIOU WIS. ~.~

......

-......

BYRON STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.1-1

LOCATION OF THE SITE WITHIN THE STATE

r -----r IIIIII~

20~

Z • ... W

o ~~W ..J

fi~~ III..J (J ~= 0

lit C

% a: uIII

,,

+----+--J

wz

D~QC

L---

)0W..J..JC>

C~~..J..J...o

w...o

qz]

o

>"'1Z •::>oow....C),0'

..1

.I

r.JII

-----+BYRON STATION

UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.1-2

LOCATION OF THE SITE WITHIN OGLE COUNTY

SIrE BOUNDARY

----- ROCKVALE AND t1ARIOIl TOHtlSHIPS

· ._..~--..;........

SCALE IN IUlES

BYRON STATIONUPDATED FINAl SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.1-3

LOCATION OF THE SITE WITHIN ROCI<VALEAND MARION TOWNSHIPS

TRAFFIC LEGENDANNUAL AVERAGE 24HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME

o STATE HIGHWAYS

o COUNTY HIGHWAYS

PRIMARY HIGHWAYS

---- 2000 AND OVER

o 2MflES

SCALE

OTHER HIGHWAYS

..... - 1000 TO 1999

------............_.. - ..-

400 TO 999

150 TO 399

LESS THAN 'SO


FIGURE 2.1-4

ROADS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED TRAFFICVOLUMES WITHIN THE SITE VICINITY

BURLINGTONURTURN R. R.

IlIUUD spua

~1.1 •• ClalCI ••••

ClICACO,IIL.AlIEEST. PAUL l

PUIFIC ••••

!t:==i::1 =::::i::1 ==1I'LiI


FIGURE 2.1-5

RAILROAD NETWORK WITHIN 6 MILESOF THE SITE

;>.'


FIGURE 2.1-5a

ROUTE OF BYRON STATIONRAILROAD SPUR

REFERENCE:BASE MA" FROM ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS: WISCONSINU.S.G.S. NK 16,4 DATI'D 1958

____ EXCLUSIOfl AREA

•••••••••••• SITE BOUNDARY

WlNl101UM EItCLUStON

SECTORBOuNDARY OtSTANeE

(FEET) SECTOR

ZOOO"00

NNE 2050 BYRON STATIONSSw 3ZOO

~NE 162!> UPDATED ANAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT"'00

'.0039"~

137!l3000 FIGURE 2.1-6

ESE '4Z!>4OZ.

172!l3300 SITE LAYOUT AND EXCLUSION AREASSE 262528.25

b 1 2

l!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijSCALE IN MILES

_ _ _ EXCLUSION AREA

••••••••• SITE BOUNDARY


FIGURE 2.1-6a

TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE AREA

o 100 100 SOCFeET

REVISION 7DECEMBER i998

BYRON STATIONUPDATEO FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

flCURE 2.'-7

LOCATION ANO OiUENTATION OFPRINCIPLE PLANT STRUCTURES

168

w

N

E

S

~--L OGlE COUNTY --

0 6 10MILES

SCALE


FIGURE 2.1-8

SECTOR DESIGNATIONS Wrn-UN 10 MILESOF THE SITE

SCALE

FIGURE 2.1-9

LOCATION Of MNOA CITIES WITHIN50 MILES OF THE SITE


o•__........iil..O""""""..5....~2a;O"""",,;2SMILE S

ELGIN

IWALWORTH

I COUNTY-r----'--001"--

.Lft,NESVllU

lAOD·

ROCK COUNTYCOUNTY

.'IUPOU

I'HARVARD

BOONE Me HENRY

I C:N" ICO":"I ULV':J MARENGO

--- -~IDE KALB COUNTY1KANE

SITE r

ISYCAMORE

ROCHELLE MALT" • I.. .. ~__.~'---.1 DEKALI \

' .flANKUH

GlOVE HINKUY

WATf~""N .\

.AMBOY I S"NDW'~-~l:~-O-~LEE COUNTY I SOMONAUK • •

aT4MPIC0.L --L ---1._-f-- ·ULAND

T --- .WA~NUT--·--- I. IAR~VILLE.. MENDOT"

LA MOILLE

ILA SALLECHUI' •

...."'" alODHEAD14.'" ,,4.1 MONROEIlt

,,~~~~_o WISCONSI~WA:EN/ -iUiNOis _0 _

WINNEBAGO

ISTEPHENSON COUNTY COUNTY ~

.UNA ...

I •. WINNEBAGO

._---- --.L. __.-r.OGLECOUNT~-----'MOU~T ICAR,ROLl .LANAU ,fORRESTON

MOU"T

SAVANNA I MO~1S

CARROLL COUNTY

MILlIDGEVILLE.. ~.'OLO' GRAND. . - __ . DETOUR

WHITESIDE COUNTY .fULTON SWISSYILLf

REVISION 9DECEMBER 2002

3 MILE SI

2I

WELD

MEMORIAL

PARK

Q

<ocr:r()

cr::>:

1I

oI

MOTOSPORT

RIVER

ROAD

CAMPING

&MARINA

MOUNT

MORRIS BOAT

CLUB

SCALE


FIGURE 2.1 - 10

TRANSPORTATION ROUTES AND PUBLICFACILITIES WITHIN THE LOW POPULATION ZONE

N

SCALE

FIGURE 2.1-11

POPULATION CENTERS WITHIN 50 MILESOF THE SITE

15 20 25MILES10


o

E

KANECOUNTY

s

NORTH $ECTOR

------ SID PEOPLE/SQUAll MILE

---- 10DD PEOPLE/SQUARE IILE_._.- CUMULATIVE PO'ULlTION 1810

CUMULATIVE P'PULATION 2020

10 6

~

"/ .".",-

" "lOS /""""

~ ~

(/":z / I0- /,/ /'~ 1 04-...=:ID-O ID-

OW I:--~..... 1 03=:I

:Ill!=u

o 5 10 zo 3D •• 50

DISTANCE FROI SITE, IllES


FIGURE 2.1-12

1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITYWITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE

(SHEET 1 OF 16)

:ItCit- 1 O~....OIC..=a..Cita..

...=r.-....OIC.. 103=•=U

1 02

NORTH· NORTHEaST SECTOR

--- --- 500 PEOPLE/SQUIRE .,LE

---- lOOO PEO'LE/S,U.E IILE

_._.- CUIULaTlVE POPUllTlOIL lU.

CUMULaTIVE 'OPULaTlON 2020

10' o 5 10 20 31 40 51

DIStaNCE FROM SITE, MILES

. BYRON STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 2 OF 16)

--- --- 500 PEOPLE/SQUARE llLE

---- 1100 PEOPLE/S ... U IIlE_._.- COIUllTIU POPULATIOII 1.. 0

CUMULATIVE POPULATION 2020

z0- 104........=-A-DGo

...=--...-=... 103

=-•=-u

NORTHEAST SECTOR

o 5 10 20 31 40

OISTANCE FIOI SITE, IIUS


FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 3 OF 16)

z:ell

te-'

=A.ellA.

te-'=:E=u

1 0'

EAST· NORTHEAST HeTOR

--- --- SlO PEOPU/SQUAIE IIU

---- 11 .. PEOPLEISQURE IILI

-._.- CalULATIYE 'OPULATIO. lU.

CUIULATIVE POPULATION 2021

o 5 10 30 soD'STUlCE r.oll SIT(. IllES


FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 4 OF 16)

:za

...=-

1 07

EaST SECTU

------ SOD PEOPLE/SqUaRE IILE

---- 1100 PEOPLE/suau IILE

_._.- CUIULaTIVE 'O'ULaTION 198'

CUIULaTIVE POPUUTION 2020

1 0' o 5 10 20 30 .. soDISTANCE FROI SITE, IllES

BYRON STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALVSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 5 OF 16)

EAST • SGUTIEIn SECTOR

1 06

"""""/ ,"#i' ,,"

105

/ ",#i'''

,

~ ~"1/:II: I I0- /,/to- 10·e....=-...0... IWI I=--to-e.... 103

=-:Ii=-u

--- --- SOD HOPLE/SQUIRE IILE

---- lODO PEOPLE/SOUAIE IUE

----- CUIUUlIH PO'ULAlION Itll

CUMUUTlVE POPULATION 2020

0510 20 30 50

DISTANCE FROI SITE. IILlS


FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 6 OF 16)

1~

:z0-~ 104-~=Do0Do

...=--~-~ 103

=•=Col

SOUTHEAST SECTOR

------ SOD PEOPLE/SQUAIE llLE

---- 1010 PEOPU/S QUA IE llLE

_._.- CUIULATIVE POPULATION 1110

CUMULATIVE POPULATION 2020

,10 0 5 10 20 30 40 so

DISTANCE FROM SITE, IllES


FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 7 OF 16)

SOUTH· SOUTHEAST SECTOR

- - - - - - 500 PE0 PLE IS QU' IE llLE

---- lOOO PEOPLE/SClUAIE llLE_._.- CUIULATIVE POPULATIOII 1910

CUMULATIVE POPUUTION 20ZO

1 06

",

"/' ~,--

" ~

/",~",,

105

/ /;:/ /

z0 I I- /,/... 104-...=D-O

ID-

IAl I:--...•... 103

=E=u

o 5 10 20 30 4D 50

DISTANCE fROM SITE, MILES


FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 8 OF 16)

SOUTH SECTOR

______ SOO PEOPLE/SQUAIE MILE

----- 100D PEOPLE/SQUIRE llLE

_._.- CUMULATIVE "POLUIO_ lt1.


10 6

-'//' "-,,',, ,

10$

/"",-", /

/////• I ICI- 10' //to-e...=-A.CI IA.

ow I=--to-e...I:t 10 3

•=-u

10 1

o 5 lD 20 31 4D SO

DISTANCE FROM SIH, IlLES


FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 9 OF 16)

10 7

:zo...oJ

=CIooCIo

0601

=......=•=U

10'

SOUTH SOUTHWEST SECTOR

------ SOD PEOPLE/SQUARE llLE_____ 1800 PEOPLE/SQUARE llLE

----- C'IUUlIVl 'OPULATION lUI


10 '8 5 10 20 30 40 50

DIS TA NCE FR°I SITE , IllES


FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 10 OF 16)

SOUTHWEST SECTOR

10 6

,// -,',-',

10 5 /' /'~~~~ • __--e

, ~~ "-.~/,/ ,/:z ,/ ~l0- 10·~ (,/ '/--=t~

0~

I r;/...=-~- .,--1:1 1 0 ~•0u

------ 500 PEOPLE/SQUARE IILE

----- lODO PEOPLE/SQUAIE llLE_._.- CUMULATIVE POPULATION 1...

CUIULATIVE POPULATION ZOZO

10 1

o 5 10 ZO 30 41 50

OISUNCE FROM SITE, MILES

BYRON STATIOhUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 11 OF 16)

______ 500 PlOPLE/SQUARl I.Ll

----- 1000 PUPU/SQUUE I.LE

_._.- CUMULATIVE POPUUTlON lUO

CUIULAT.VE POPULAT.ON 2020

:zo-......::J0.o0....=......::J

•::JU

10 '

1 O~

10'

WEST SOUTHWEST SECTOR

10 ' 0510 20 30 40 SO

DISTANCE FROM SITE, IlLES


FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 12 OF 16)

zo...c...1:1~

o~

'AI

=...c...1:1E1:1tot

18'

10"

•,•,

•

DISTANCE

WEST SECTOR

-----_ SOO PEOPLEISQuaRE IIlE

----- 1000 PE OPLE/SQUIE IIlE

_._.- CUIUUTIVE POPUUTI'. Itli

CUI~L~TI~E POPULaTION 2020

40 50

SITE III IlLES


FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 13 OF 16)

WEST NORTHWEST SECTOR

- 500 PEOPLE/SQUARE IILE

----- 1110 'IOPLE/stUn IILE-._.- C'IIUOn ""Utll. " ••

CUIUlaTIVE 'O'UlaTION 2020

10 6

//' ...,",,"10 5 /' ..;;"

,,~

, /~

a !/0- I I...• 10· //...=-a.0a. I... I:110-.........=- 10 3•=-..

1\)1o 5 10 40 50

DISTANCE FlOM SITE. IlLES


FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 14 OF 16)

ole...=..o..-l-e...=E=u

10'

1 0'

NORTHWEST SECTOR

~,

~/"/ "",

/ ' ,'.'.'_........--" .-_.." ,..../,,/" ,

,/ ~1/ r'

II,",.,-

------ 500 PEOPLE/SQUARE MILE

----- 10DD PEOPLE/SOUARE MILE

_._-- CUMUlATI¥[ POPUlATION 1110

CUMULaTIVE POPULATION 2020

10 1

oDISTANCE FROM SITE. MILES


FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 15 OF 16)

NORTH NORTHWlST SECTOR

500 PEO PLE IS QVA R£ III E

10 00 P£ 0 PLE IS GII IE II L£

CUMULATIVE POPULATION 1.10CUMULATIVE POPULATION 2020

--------_.------

10 6

,~

/ ,,', .,"1 05

/ ,~.,, ~,.

/~~~, ~

:II: I,"~0- , I..

//c 10'""'"=L0L I.... I=-...c...= 10 3•=c..

10 1

oDISTANCE FROM SITE, IIUS


FIGURE 2.1-12


(SHEET 16 OF 16)

•

••dSTILLMAN VALLEY

ApLANT

WSITE

•• •LEAF RIVER

·0

•• MT. MORRIS

~.

• INDUSTRIAL AREAS

• QUARRIES

o 5

SCI LE


FIGURE 2.2-1

LOCATION OF INDUSTRIAL AREAS WITHIN10 MILES OF THE SITE

2MILES

,III

8:'12'",IIII

~=••o

SITE

o

--~O'EGON STATION

-

" -.

"-••

6"

6"

LEGEND

____... 3"

------ AMOCO

-----eADGER PIPELINE CO.

--- NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.

SCALE


FIGURE 2.2-2

LOCATION OF PIPELINES WlllilN5 MILES OF THE SITE

o 5 10MILES

LEGEND

.. CITY

o TOWN

-t AIRPORT

~ SEAPLANE BASE

~\\...\\\\ AIRWAY.,,\\.•...

SCALE

BYRON STATlONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSrS REPORT

FIGURE 2.2-3

AIRPORTS AND AIRWAYS WITHIN10 MILES OF THE SITE

IlIWX _s3 2 I9

•w••

•13 I

~. . . . ." JO DAYIESS Sf(,,"ENsor. -NtMao! McHENRY lAKE

-3 3 5 i 4 3I

Scale of Miles20 40 eo 110 100

, ! ! , I

NO. OF TORNADOES •~ OGLE II' 0[ KANE COOl(

PER COUNTY (1916-1969) IW.854YEAR PERIOD WHlTtSIOE LE£ 3

• 6 6

•~ HOIRY BUttfAll LASALLE

~ISlNID 7 S 91BC0

3..3 1oo-"....-cIc.

o!

BYRON STAnONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 2.3-1

NUMBER OF TORNADOES ORIGINATING INEACH COUNTY IN THE STATE OF. ILLINOIS.

1916·1969

NNW

N

JS

NNE

ENE

- E

ESE

SSE

>1.5080.26- 3.01-1.5 7.0

CALM "'~__•1.51-

3.0MPS


FIGURE 2.3-2

JANUARY WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL(BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW

NW

WNW

w -

wsw

SW

SSW ,S

NI NNE

SSE

NE

SE

ENE

- E

ESE

FIGURE 2.3-3

FEBRUARY WIND ROSE 30·FOOT lEVEL(BYRON 1974-1976)

BYRON STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT>7

MPS

80.26- 3.01-

_ 1 5 7.0CALM '« \,,'U__

1. 5 1-3.0

NNWNI NNE

WNW

w -

wsw

ENE

- E

ESE

SSW I

S

0.26- 3.01-

8 15 7.0CALM '.. ~,~__•

1.51- >73.0

MPS

SSE


FIGURE 2.3-4

MARCH WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL(BYRON 1974-1976)

NNWNI NNE

WNW

W -

wsw

ssw SSE

ENE

- E

0.26- 3.01-

8 1 5 7.0CALM . C .." ••••

1.51- >73.0

MPS


FIGURE 2.3-5

APRIL WIND ROSE 30·FOOT LEVEL(BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW

N

I NNE

WNW

W -

WSW

ENE

- E

ESE

SSW

0.26- 3.01-

BALM 1.5 « ~~~__•1.51- >7

3.0MPS

S

SSE


FIGURE 2.3-6

MAY WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL(BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW

N

I NNE

WNW

w -

wsw

ENE

- E

ESE

>7

ssw

0.26- 3.01-

8 1 5 7·0CAL M . .'~N__•

1.51-3.0

MPS

IS

SSE


FIGURE 2.3-7

JUNE WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL(BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW

WNW

W -

wsw

0.26- 3.01-

GAUA 1.5 ..,~~~__•

1.51- >7

3.0MPS

NI NNE

ENE

- E

ESE


FIGURE 2.3-8

JULY WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL(BYRON 1974-1976)

WNW

w -

wsw

N

I

11.20S

NNE

SSE

ENE

- E

ESE

0.26- 3.01-

8AlM 1.5 • "J;J1. 5 1-

3.0MPS

>7BYRON STATION


FIGURE 2.3-9

AUGUST WIND ROSE 30·FOOT LEVEL(BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW

N

I NNE

WNW

W -

WSW

ENE

- E

ESE

SSW

12.82S

SSE

0.26- 3.01-

8ALM 1.5 « .~.O1.51-

3.0MPS

>7BYRON STATION


FIGURE 2.3-10

SEPTEMBER WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL(BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW

WNW

W -

WSW

N

I NNE

ENE

- E

ESE

0.26- 3.01-

BALM 1.5 ~~.,~•••1.51- > 7

3.0MPS

14.83S


FIGURE 2.3-11

OCTOBER WIND ROSE 30·FOOT LEVEl(BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW

WNW

W -

wsw

S

N

I NNE

ENE

- E

ESE

0.26- 3.01-

8ALM1.5 .. .~~_~ __

1.51- >73.0

MPS


FIGURE 2.3-12

NOVEMBER WIND ROSE 30·FOOT LEVEL(BYRON 1974-1976)

WNW

W -

WSW

SSW

NI

11.41

~

NNE

SSE

ENE

- E

ESE

>7

0.26-81.5 3.017.0

[ ~I:.'-1.51-

3.0MPS


FIGURE 2.3-13

DECEMBER WIND ROSE 30-FOOT lEVEL(BYRON 1974-1976)

WNW

w -

WSW

SSW

N

I

s

NNE

SSE

ENE

- E

ESE

0.26- 3.01-o 1.5 r r';~~_.V 1.51- >73.0


FIGURE 2.3-14

ANNUAL WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL(BYRON 1974-1976)

WNW

W -

WSW

NNW

NI

IS

NNE

ENE

- E

ESE

SSE

0.26- 3.01-

8 1.5 1.0CALM ~..:z.._.

1.51- -.>1

3.0MPS


FIGURE 2.3-15

ANNUAL WIND ROSE 250-FOOT LEVEL(BYRON 1974-197~)

wI,

e 41-12 >'20- 3 '---<=:=::::l

mph

N

• 0/0 IS 0/0

s


FIGURE 2.3-16

WINTER WIND ROSE 19·FOOT LEVEL(ARGONNE 1950-1964)

£

w

N

$

8 4 - 12 > 12O· ~ --c::===,

",ph


FIGURE 2.3-17

SPRING WIND ROSE 19-FOOT LEVEL(ARGONNE 1950-1964)

£

N

s

e.·" > ",mph


FIGURE 2.3-18

SUMMER WIND ROSE 19-FOOT LEVEL(ARGONNE 1950-1964)

w

N

s

G...:,._-...:12:....c:==>=12~V mph


FIGURE 2.3-19

FALL WIND ROSE 19·FOOT LEVEL(ARGONNE 1950-1964)

E

NNWN

NNE

WNW

WSW

ENE

o Of.

E

ESE

SSWs

SSE

@.25-1 .80 1.8rG.30ALM ( It1 5

> 6 030


FIGURE 2.3-20

ANNUAL WIND ROSE 20-FOOT LEVEL(ROCKFORD 1966-1975)

PASQUILL STABILITY CLASSES

A ~ I~D+-E-+-F-+-- G ~28 BJ Lc26 ·..• •

• •• •• •

24 • •• •• •

22 • •• ••

20 - BYRON 1974 -1976..-.. (250-30 FT)-.! 18°........ • ••• CARROLL COUNTY 1975-1976• •>- • ( 330 -33 FT.)U 16 •

•Z •w 14 •:::> •0 •

• • ••w 12 •0:: ••lL.

10

8

6 •••

4 ••• •

2 ••••0-6.0 -4.5 -3.0 -t5 0 1.5 3.0 4.5 60 7.5

VERTICAL TEMPERATURE GRADIENT (oC/10e M)


FIGURE 2.3-21

VERTICAL TEMPERATURE GRADIENT HISTOGRAMSFOR BYRON (1974-1976) AND

CARROLL COUNTY (1975-1976)

._-------------- ----,------

o II I

SCALE - MILES


FIGURE 2.3-21a

PREDICTED SPRING SEASON VISIBLE PLUMEFREOUENCY, TWO NATURAL DRAFT TOWERS.

55% CAPACITY FACTOR

o II I

SCAlE -MILES


FIGURE 2.3-21 b

PREDICTED SUMMER SEASON VISIBLE PLUMEFREQUENCY. TWO NATURAL DRAFT TOWERS.

75% CAPACITY FACTOR

- '- - ..... -----_._--------:-------


FIGURE 2.3-21c

PREDICTED FAll SEASON VISIBLE PLUMEFREQUENCY,lWO NATURAL. DRAFT TOWERS,

55% CAPACITY FACTOR

SCALE - MILES

-BYRON STAnON


FIGURE 2.3-21d

PREDICTED WINTER SEASON VISIBLE PLUMEFREQUENCY, TWO NATURAl DRAFT TOWERS,

75% CAPACITY FACTOR

.- _._._._-_._._- -----_.._---- _._---

BYRON

SCALE - MILES


FIGURE 2.3·21.

PREDICTED ANNUAL AVERAGE DEPOSITION RATEOF ORin SOLIDS, TWO NATURAL. DRAn TOWERS,

65% CAPACITY FACTOR


FIGURE 2.3-22

TOPOGRAPHICAl MAP OF SITE VICINITY WITHINA la-MILE RADIUS

o I••• 2 3; ;

Scale in Miles

4;

5;

900

N 800 ~~aI-~-~------";::------------:::~

700

900

NNE 800+~~~-~....L.~",-==:=:--"","-T""':=-::-::::'::---"""::::=

700

900

NE 800-l-"'::::==:::::::=---~=====----~-----700

900

ENE 8001-------=----======--------

700

900

E 800+--~======---""11111::"'--~-=:::=.-_=='--

700

900 .-__--_

ESE 800 +------l..~_:;JII"'.:==--====::::::...~-':;::::::::====:::::lI"..-tt:.:..-

100

900 1-- - ......

SE 8004----------.,;:::::=.===:::a..~...yte.::::::lIoo.,..e~-----

700

o 2.. , LE S

3 4 5


FIGURE 2.3-23

TOPOGRAPHICAL CROSS SECTION OF SITEVICINITY WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS

(SHEET 1 OF 3)

5432

900

S 800

700

900

SSW 800

700

900

SW 800

700

900

WSW 800

700

900

W 800

700

900

WN.800

700

900

NW 800

700

900

NNW 800

700

0

MILES


FIGURE 2.3-23

TOPOGRAPHICAL CROSS SECTION OF SITEVICINITY WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS

(SHEET 2 OF 3)

c:

0"l

l0

"tl

»$8

nl~~

0 ..,=H

z »IJI

~~~

i5r-

-<en

:D»

0m

_C

'>C

..,z

'!jZ

:D:D

~~

",~lil

m N

°tC

/)~

»!j

."C/)

~F~

z-

m::

j~g

~~

-< en in~~

:DC/)

m=i

"ll

0m

:D ....

27D

s

CHICAGO (O'HARE) PERSISTENCES

..

.'"•...

NE


FIGURE 2.3-24

CHICAGO (O'HARE) WIND ROSE

w-

8AL M ~-::--ci::;::;;:;:JnIlUIII_~~0.26 1.61 3.01 > 7.0

1.5 3.0 7.0

MPS

N

- E

I

S


FIGURE 2.3-25

ANNUAL WIND ROSE FOR 33·FOOT LEVELAT CARROLL COUNTY STATION SITE

(8-1-76 TO 7·31-n)

WNW

wsw

NNW

SSW

NNNE

ENE

E

ESE

SSES

2.0 -6.00 >6.00

11


FIGURE 2.3-26

ANNUAL WIND ROSE FOR 20-FOOT LEVELAT MOLINE, ILLINOIS

(1967-1976)


FIGURE 2.4-1

2

MILESINSCALI::

o

PLANT SITE AREA TOPOGRAPHY

•••••••••• SHE BOUNDARY

3000 0,seA L E IN FEET

3000!


FIGURE 2.4-2

RIVER SCREEN HOUSE ANDMAKEUP LINES

®1000 0 1000'

SCALE IN FEET

_ •••••••• SITE BOUNDARY

BYRON STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFm ANALYSIS REPORT

FIGURE 24-3

OUTLINE OF MAJOR PLANT STRUCTURES

LOCATION MAP

)I

Mi'",-

IOWAii:rnio lS

LEGEND.

-+4------+----r------~---42°

(JD10 5 0 10 20

SCALE IN MILES

• RECORDING STATION

I::; NON-RECORDING STATION

• CITY OR TOWN


FIGURE 2.4-4

HYDROLOGIC NETWORK OF ROCK RIVER

l)R

lRR

ES

TO

N

V FRE

EPO

RT

~\)

POLO

ST

AR

CE

ME

N

.-"

DIX

ON

DA

M~

OA

MB

OY

aA

SHTO

N

US

ER

RO

CH

ELLE

CJ

c: "'1:1

~0 ~

~m 0

0:!

I(I

Iz

i!~

~~

en n

......

m>

/5c

n:D

:~o-v

O»

>0

00~~

c:

~;"m '" ~

~~

iii"

,..c:

»>

0'"

~..

.Zen

-<en

~a

1..

Z:D

~m "'C

I0 :D ...

105 ~.----.--~--..- ..-.. - ... --'-r-,-----_. _._---

'-....--- ._.._- .._..-- ._--

V'llL.

U

Z

wC)

0::octJ:uV'l

o

104 _

._ ... _-------------

620

2 .10 L_..

605 610 615

.-'-- -l

625

WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET


FIGURE 2.4-6

RATING CURVE FOR ROCK RIVER AT COMO

enLL

U

Z

UJ(!)

0:<l:I:Uen0

103

IiI1 ;

I,I

I,I

!

I

~

Ii i

f/Ii ---!

7

I! /:

/I

!- . -.- ._.-'-.-. II

..

II

-- ..- ._-"---

I-.-. - "_.- ._--

t ._- -

--1..

. - ,,_._--_.-

-T . -_. - -_ .._-

; - - - - ---

I

._'._-_.. .. ... --_._---+ ._.~

i

I!I

I l

725

II

102 I'--- ---'L...------L.-------'

705 710 715 720



FIGURE 2.4-7

RATING CURVE FOR ROCK RIVER AT ROCKTON

REvISION 8DECEMBER 2000

zoo 0 2.00 400

SCAL! IN FEET

------ ..AHHOLf AND UNDERGROUNDPIPE DRAINS

--!..- DIRECTION OF GRADING SLOPt

CULVERt

BYRON STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANAlYSIS REPORT

AGURE2.4-B

SITE DRAINAGE. ROAD AND TRACK ELEVATIONS

· ,REVISION 8DECEMBER 2000

CUL.VERT

FIGURE 2.4-9

SUBDMSION OF PLANT AREA FOR LOCALINTENSf PRECIPITAnON ANALYSIS

BYRON STAnONUPOATEO FINAL SAfETY ANALYSIS REPORT

----IIQIIOLE AIlD UImUtSIIllUIrOptll£ DRAIlIIS

OIltECTION 01' GlIADDI:l II.OP

--....

,ill . _ \c:._~ ". ,)0

'. -

r----,---r-----,---,-------r--.----.,---.-----.:

t----+---+----+--+---+---t-----"i------!1Il....

N

(/)

~--_- I III ~i ~ 0

I

ZN

I'" zI 0

~<l0::;:)o

_-+---+-_10lID,

--+---+---+----4 ~

o

._+ > ~+---+----+--------~ ~, '2~ I

-+--+---+---=~-+----l~~~--ID

t--1t-+--+---+--+----4--+---+--__~-__+_-----l~

~iI \~--i

:+----_=\-~d ---.---,~ -.__44__+___

L--- -\_

;----- T\\'--···----------+-\-H-il-L:- I I

! -'l. r i"

S3H:>NI NI S311W '05 oooe·~o.:l NOIl.\flldl:>3~d3g\f~3A\f


FIGURE 2.4-10

COMPARISON OF DEPTH-DURATION·RELATIONSHIPS FOR MAJOR STORMS

• BYRON STATION


FIGURE 2.4-11

ROCK RIVER 72-HOUR SPS ISOHYETAlAND SUB-BASIN MAP

- ._- . _-----_._------_._._--

..J

4233

..._--_..._-

...1-- _1._.•...

32 34

...1 -J._ .24 28

-----"loo,----.-...-. -..

2016

...._.._- ----+----

j -

12

6 ~.. - ---+--4

5 -(/)l&.to>

0Z«(/)

:::>0:::r:r-zwC)

cr«:::r:to>(/)

0

TIME. IN DAY S


FIGURE 2.4-12

ROCK RIVER SUB-BASIN I 12-HOURUNIT HYDROORAPH

14 ,-----.....----..,---

168144

. - --_ ....__.._----1

120

,+- --- -........,

II

72 96

TIME IN HOURS

SUB-BASIN Y(4 HOUR)

!

48

SUB-BASIN m(8 HOUR)

J

24

t\-SUB-BASIN l1r; " (2 HOUR), ,, ,,

\,

ol-. ..l..- .L. ..L.._~_...L__=~_ _L_=~_....r::~l!lIL.._.....J

o

12 I--~-


FIGURE 2.4-13

ROCK RIVER SU~ASINS II, III, IV, AND VUNIT HYDROGRAPHS

INal

II.

oN

o- -- \D

\D--'-~N

,0--- ._-_' '--__--#-_ CD,

1~1'-L\D

I !!!

j-!./ -~I tf)

, 0 0=I --~ 5

I CD :I:

I -0. - zI -

--~ ---l-~ -* ~z~ I --tr I .- .-

- ~:l ~- -#. --- CDCD~ II \D ICD_

~~ 7I

~//-

/./

I.\ . -~

I '~ - ---- - - --- ~: ......_-

"""~~ ~+-~NI,

i - -- .I

-T ----,-- - - -

i!

-i

al CD ,... \D

S.:f:l ON'fSnOH.l. NI 3!H:l\fH::>SIO


FIGURE 2.4-14

ROCK RIVER SUB-BASINS VI AND VIIUNIT HYDROGRAPHS

II)

,.,.,

0.,

CDIt)

NIt)

enII) )0-N <t

0

., ZN

UJ

0 ~-N I-

~

ooo

N£ ~ .i £ ~s.:l~ ON'VSnoH.l NI 3~~:n1H~SIO

o.,

1I I ! I I I

I

!! I

I I II

I :

!: i

I !

I

Ii

I i II IiI

II

i iI

I

j, : ~

I i ; !

~-I i LJI ! i

I.. ..~ . .~ .. ... _._-+--_.--+ -I !

I :I

~ ... _- ~._- . -, -.--t' !

Ii

i I

I !I I .---J

j ;

Ii

r._-- ---- .. ... _-

I:

(/) I !u.u , ig I I

,-0 _ ...-- t " - - _._. I • .-~.,I I I

!!? I

III I i:lC I I I,...,4 I - -----t- .- •.. ---.

Wel- I i

c::: Ii I j

I .


FIGURE 2.4-15

ROCK RIVER STANDARD PROJECTFLOOD HYDROGRAPH

0::E0(,)

,It) 0I

Q CD(7)

~ 0

~ "\oJ~

C) Vlz aC

! UJI~ UJ,U

Q><wu.0

>-I-:JII)<t

", II), 000:-Q.

-oJ<t:::>zz<t

NI

Q

ID,--r------, 01 ·T

, I, ,, I,,,,

\- .--..----\-.------1\1-+--------\,\

-----i-·'·----

\\,-_.__._-_._---- ..... _._--_._.- - ..._._._ ..-\--~\-

\\, z\ <%, 0,~,,

I

0'----8-'-----::~--~0-~-g'----~---gL-L------'0 Q

~", 2S.:l:> ON\1SnOH~ NI 3~~\1H::>SIO


FIGURE 2.4-16

FLOOD DISCHARGES AT INTAKE

Iww...

720,..

i:

700 -

690 -

680 -

620 Lo 10 15 20 25 30 35

DISTANCE UPSTREAM FROM GOVERMENT DAM AT STERLING IN MILES40 45


FIGURE 2.4-17

ROCK RIVER WATER SURFACE PROFILES

400030002000

\I

'" J--~ /,r~ I

l ~ 0." .'LES DOWNSTR",-"""""" 1MTI£ SCREENHOUS~

UJ 6601000

670

700

680

690

lL. 700 r------~...,------_r_-----.....,

3000

6000

1000 2000DISTANCE IN FEET

4000

I ) I

• ,.-V) MB .'LES DOWNST......

FROM THE SCREEN HOUSE

~

I650o

660

S80~-----~r----,,----+---~--_j

680

670

Z 690f-------\+-------+-----~_j

~ 670 ~-----~---\=~~=+=~----~0.85 MILES DOWNSTREAMFROM THE SCREEN HOUSE

J- 660 '-- --'-- ~'_'_ ~

<l 3000

>UJ 690

...J

NOTE:------CROSS SECTIONS ARE

LOOKING DOWNSTREAMBYRON STATION


FIGURE 2.4-18

ROCK RIVER CROSS SECTIONSNEAR THE SITE


Fir

800!

o

i/

/

FIGURE 2.4-19

1912-1913 CROSS SECTIONBASE LINE OF C OF E

SCALE IN FEET

ROCK RIVER 1913 SURVEY

800

I

,,,,,II.'..,..,.I

.:~

X 680.9ILLINOIS R 0 UTE 2 X681.2 681.8 X

=- _._ ---""::-:.. _::::X::;67=6.:::8::::~_. "'~ ...

WATER ELEVATiON: 671.6'DATE OF SURVEY: JULY 13,1973HISTORIC HIGH wATER ELEVATION : 68~.6·

LOW WATER ELEVATION 670.4

ROCK R I V E R

OIl FLOW -. ---._. - -.

100.o

IN fEETSCALE

100

FIGURE 2.4-20

ROCK RNER 1973 SURVEY

J,~t


679.8 X681.7

_81 +50W

SCREENI

HOUSE679.6

\X,--I I L---l-....J--:::::::::::,-./

" :;II ~,I 0I I 1'---,

679.4XX 679.0

678.8 X n680.9 \j

X 678,8

o..+,..

677.7 X '"

X 678.4

IT I \L.I. !\ '- ~

I

II -_~

~I

I I

I,

II

II

In .

t \ )iI 'J

,

~)I

I _-J,I _- iI

I II

- v I

tij I!

I I-------~ .. .,.--.+._-----, ~ - ," - -

i

J ~i

I IIII

I iI

1----- - - ,.• .. f .. ._-_ ..

jI

A ,

_2 I

,-V :

I--og o

01<0

1.33.:1 NI NOI1.'11\313

oCDCD

0

8N

0~

'~

If'0 2!~ If' I.... ~

!!! en~ -.

>-g ... ~

w>

:;) a::~LU

., :;)

~ >- Ul

w I&i

~> ...a:: 0

0 :;) u~~

Ul- -0z z

~wClw(f) ..J

goCD

02:cot

~ UJz ex:01-..... (,/')I- z:U3

iUJO(,/')0

(,/') (,/')(,/')~

00

~Ic:: 0U....J

00N

o,0It)CD


FIGURE 2.4-21

ROCK RIVER CROSS SECTIONSNEAR INTAKE

106~===l====+=~=-t:===:J

~---_.- -------- -.. --------- ------------1------1

1-----1

.1-! ._-- ------j

'1 -----

-------

I ,

/I

I

_.. _--

==- 7/-- ---------- ----'----+-----1

/

I!

:.- ···7f-----

105 r-------+-~v-___t_-~/:

If)

l.LU

~

LLI(.!)a:<tJ:UIf)

0 104

II

I j--_. - --

j-----+---_. -

710680 690 700


---..1+----+----+------1!

~+-------I

i103 l.L..- ...I.-- ...l.- .....L- .....J

670


FIGURE 2.4-22

RATING CURVE FOR ROCK RIVERAT INTAKE

RIVERSCREEN HOUSE

......

·...._.~-.;.;...:..~.:~...:-.:...,...._ ..•_~

..--::...--...........

1/2 o


FIGURE 2.4-23

SCALE IN MILES ROCK RIVER WIND ACTION FETCH DIAGRAM

SYSTEM SERJESGROUP OR HYDROGEOLOG IC

DESCRIPTION HYDROGEOLOGI C CHARACTERISTI CSFORMAT! ON UNIT

Peoria

i~~~~ j~~:~ r- Ground water Occurs predominantly in thinsllnd and gravel pockets within the glacial

Wedron arilt. Yields are quite variable andformation typically low. suitable only for domestic(Esmond Ti 11 and fann purposes. Wells or cisterns thatMemher) Silt. locally clayey. intersect the more permeable lone!> may

i Morton Glacilll gravelly and sandy. e)(h1bit high, short ... tentl ylelds.

P1e i 50 tocene Loess Drift wi th 1nterbeddedWinnebago Aquitard 1enses of sand and

'" Formation gravel~ (Argyle Till

Member)

Glasfordformatton(Ogle TillMember)

Gal enaDolaml te and limestone.Group Galena- Loca l1y cherty. sandy

Platteville et base. shale partingsPlatteville dolomi tes

GroupGround water occurs under leaky artesian

Champ1ainian conditions in the sandstones and in joints

:! in the dolomites. In the Galena·Plattevilledolomites ground ",,/liter also occurs underu

Ancei I water table cand' lions whe"e the over-

8 Glenwood- Sandstone, shale at lying Maquoketa Gro\lp is absent. Yieldsg Group St. Peter lop, little aolomile, are variable and depend upon which unitssandstone

~ locally cherty at base are open to the well.:'

;Prairie c In terms of ~he total yield of a well

Canadian au Chien ~

penetrating the entire thickness of theGroup u

Prairie ·s Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer, the Glenwood·51. Peter sandstone supplies about 15 per·du Chien, "'E Sandy dolomite. cent, the Prairie du Chien, Eminence.

Eminence, 9 dolomitic sandstone. Potosi. and Franconia dolomites collectivelyEminence Potos f. and ; cherty at top, inter· s:Jpp1y about 3, percent. and the 1ronton-Formation Franconia ~ bedded sl'\ale to lower bblesvilJe sandstone supplies about 50 per-dolo",' tes

~put cent.

POtOSlOolomi te

Fra~conid

FOnl"'4tlon

: ror.t.~fS..r..¢\'t.D('1!t

sandstone. upper part!t ! ro.ntoo-

t'"Oj,...~~ll!''i'J1Tle

dolomite.. ~~t'S'I~Ht

! $.IM"S!.tl1'-.f!'sar:.;1'S.t~ne

[au Chire Insignificant amounts of ground water may

fau Clai"e Ao:.u'terd Shales. do'orn'tes. and occur in joints. These beds act as a con-

I Fo~tion(~pper dnd shaly dolomitic sand· fining hyer between the Cambr1an..Ordovicianr:iddle beds) stone Aquifer and ttte Mt. Simon Aquifer.

Ground water occurs under le~"y arteslanconditions. Adequate supplies for municipal

Mt. Simon Sandstoneand industrial use are more easl1y obtained

Mt. S,rrof\Aqu; fer from shallower aqutfers..

Sandstone

c:."Cl

:D~m

Q Cl

~ ::!!Z~III

~ ." r-~

en:ll15~~Jl C

8 Jl

~~m

~ '"t ~!i

~.. Zi5

~z~

0 enp iii

f :IIm"

Z~:JI-i

NOTES:1)2)

3)

MODIFIED FROM: REFERENCE 19.STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE FROMBULLETINS 94 AND 95. ILLINOIS STATEGEOLOGICAL SURVEY. REFERENCES 29 AND 26.THE SPACING OF THE HYOROGEOLOGIC UNITSIS NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT THEIRRELATIVE THICKNESSES.

_ _ _ EXCLUSION AREA

SITE BOUNDAR Y

LEGEND~ell desl9ootlon• 8223 Pfdzometer INel

Btron Slohon waterwetl

Temoorary conmuctlcn.ell

Former domestic well

~I ~ bas.cI on water ...... dDto

mectlUr'Od on Jut, I, 19"N2 Mop mocMlOd from DQIft•• a

Moon, f""lfOlmlantlll ReportIn.. of e .....ed To_/C "1II'.nol'l,Unpl,lllh.II,C1 Fr.r• 9

3 Ow- ••,.,. ou forma, I,P'lvot, .ot'f ••0'

...Sc~. '" F••,

CortII:Iw InT''''al • 10 f .....


FIGURE 2 4·25

SITE AREA PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE MAPGALENA-PLATTEVILLE AQUIFER

NOTES

I. Data for public groundwater supplies within 10miles ore presented inTable 2.4-21

2. Bose map modified fromUSGS, I: 250,000 series(fopographlc),Aurora, Illinois(NK 16-F),1958. Rockford,Illinois (NK 16-4), 1958.

Q

Scale in Miles

5I


FIGURE 2.4-26

PUBLIC GROUNDWATER SUPPLIERSWITHIN 10 MILES

~-N-

~ \\\.\;\;'\,

II

NOTES

I. Modified from Reference 22.

2. Piezometric contour interval is 50 feet.

10 0 15; ! 11IIII

Scale in Miles


FIGURE 2.4-27

PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE OF THECAMBRIAN·ORDOVICIAN AQUIFER,

OCTOBER 1971

c==:J Site boundary

Designators Refer to Table 2.4-26

Base map modified from USGS.1:62.500 series (topographic).Oregon. Illinois. 1948

0EH3:::EH;c]R=1'C2::1bd;;;C]:;HD1, mil e

SCALE


FIGURE 2.4-28

LOCAnON OF V•..:LLS WITHIN 2.25 MILESOFTl-IE PlANT

~

o Well location and number

NOTES

I. The records of ground wattrlevels Ore presented onTable 2.4-28.

2. The wat.r quolit)' dota fromIhese ••ltI i, prelented InTable 2.4-27.

3. Well No 4 WOI not Includedin fhe monitOring progrOft'l.

400 0 400-Seal. in F••t~bl .....al.IOF.. t


FIGURE 2.4-29

WEll LOCATION MAPWATER QUALf1Y MONITORING SYSTEM

GROUND SURFACE

24 inch diameter casing

~--- 23 inch diameter grouted hole

~~---20 inch diameter casing

tt-----19 inch diameter grouted hole

~~----16 inch diameter casing

1--------12 or 15 inch diameteropen hole

DEPTH, FEET

0

GALENA-100 PLATTE-

200 \)

NON-

300 PUMPINGWATERLEVEL

400 GLENWOOD, PUMPST. PETERSANDSTONE

500

600 POTOSIDOLOMITE)

700FRANCONIAFORMATION

800IRONTON-GALESVILLE

900 SANDSTONES

1000

1100 EAU CLAIREFORMATION

1200

1300

1400 MT. SIMONSANDSTONE

1500BYRON STATION

UPDATED FINAL SAFETY At~ALYSIS REPORTNOTES

I. NOT TO SCALE.

2. WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ARESUMMARIZED IN TABLE 2.4-29.

3. PITLESS ADAPTER NOT SHOWN.

FIGURE 2.4·30

SKETCH OF DEEP WELL CONSTRUCTION

Date post:	25-Jun-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

Byron, Units 1 and 2, Updated Final Safety Analysis … › docs › ML1300 › ML13004A055.pdfSIrE...

Documents