C AMP P ARKS R EAL P ROPERTY E XCHANGE An Innovative Approach for MILCON July 19, 2011.

CAMP PARKS REAL PROPERTY EXCHANGE

An Innovative Approach for MILCON

July 19, 2011

2011 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE

3

PANELISTS MODERATOR: Lynn Kriegbaum, Senior Project Manager, Nova Property Solutions,

LLC, Washington, DC

SPEAKERS:

David Robinson, Chief, Facility Assets, Army Reserve, Office Chief Army Reserve, Washington, D.C.

Robert L. Davenport, Jr., Managing Partner/Counsel, Nova Property Solutions, LLC, Washington, D.C.

Frank Faye, Chief Operating Officer, SunCal, Irvine, CA

Joe Guerra, Acquisitions and Entitlements - Northern California SunCal, San Jose, CA


4

BACKGROUND


5

PARKS RESERVE FORCES TRAINING AREA

David P. Robinson, 703-545-129819 July 11

6

Real Property Exchange

David Robinson, Chief, Facility Assets, Army Reserve, Office Chief Army Reserve, Washington, D.C.


§ 18240. Acquisition of facilities by exchange. In addition to the acquisition authority provided by section 18233 of this title [10 USCS § 18233], the Secretary of Defense may authorize the Secretary of a military department to acquire a facility, or addition to an existing facility, needed to satisfy military requirements for a reserve component by carrying out an exchange of an existing facility under the control of that Secretary through an agreement with a State, local government, local authority, or private entity. The acquisition of a facility or an addition to an existing facility under this section may include the acquisition of utilities, equipment, and furnishings for the facility.

Title 10 Exchange Authority


Real Property Exchange

10 USC 18240 Authorizes exchange of non-excess reserve component

property Enacted in FY 2005 Defense Authorization Bill Modified and improved prior RPX authority

Key Points Army Reserve centrally manages its program thru COE

• Sacramento & Savannah Districts for RPX Acquire real property (RP) and/or facility by exchange of existing

non-excess Reserve Component real property/facilities Army must receive not less than Fair Market Value (FMV) Acquired RP/facility must meet operational requirements & be

complete and usable Competition to the “greatest extent practicable” though can be

Sole Source if/when justifiable Notification and wait requirement, all defense committees


RPX PROGRAM

RPX PROGRAM

US

AC

E

DA

SA

AR

IMD

- Identify RPX project & method of accomplishment- Develop requirements – 1391- Forward Eval Board results to DASA w/recommendation- Review and concur with all documents

- Provide value estimates (appraisals) to ARIMD- Prepare, coordinate, and issue NOA- Forward Evaluation Board results to ARIMD- Negotiate Exchange Agreement- Prepare and coordinate all documents

- Review documents prior to approval/execution by DASA

- Approval of NOA (solicitation package)- Accept/reject proposals- Execute Exchange Agreements and Deeds- Congressional coordination/notification

OG

CLLLL

S-SS

CC-C

CCCC

SSSS

LLLL

CCSCS

LLLLL

SS-S-

L = LEAD – Primary agent for orchestrating activities S = SUPPORT – Provides specified roles and expertiseC = CONSULT – Overarching review and guidance

RPX ROLES/RESPONSIBILITIES


PROCESSINITIATIONPROPERTYIDENTIFIED

APPRAISALOF GOVT

PROPERTY

MONTH 6

MONTH 12

MONTH 18

MONTH 24

MONTH 30

SITESELECTION

IF REQAPPROVALSDASA, T-10,

MLAW IF REQ

SOLICITATION

EVALUATIONAND

SELECTION

EXCHANGEAGREEMENT

CONSTRUCTIONSTART

CONSTRUCTION DURATION24 – 36 MONTHS

CLOSING, EXCHANGE DEEDS

SURVEY, IF REQ

NOA PREP, DEED PREP, EX AGR PREP, LTR AGR PREP

SIGNED LTR AGREEMENT

START NEPA

FOST,NEPA APPROVAL

REQUIREMENTSCOPINGDEVELOPMENT

ENVIRONMENTALCONDITION OF PROPERTYDRAFT FOST

TYPICAL RPX TIMELINE


Camp Parks RPX

Started in 2000 as recognition that RPX can be used to offset budget impacts (reduced budget)

Camp Parks Master Plan & EIS

On advice of Staubach Inc., City of Dublin brought into process so government could fully understand potential for the exchange

Notice of Availability/Industry Day

Selected SUNCAL, approval from HQDA


12

Camp Parks Exchange

Robert L. Davenport, Jr.

District Counsel

Norfolk District Corps of Engineers


13

SCOPE Largest Reserve Property Exchange accomplished in the Department of Defense

Traditional approach – smaller more discrete sites Majority of exchanges accomplished with a local municipal partner, state agency

or special legislation Oakland Army Base Subaru Lot - City of Oakland Ellington Field - University of Texas Metropolitan Council Minneapolis, MN – Rail Transit Project Steele USARC, PA – Municipal use Devens Reserve Forces Training Area – Mass Dev Finance Agency

None of these sites had a value of more than $10 million or exceeded 20 acres


14

Why Reserve Property Exchange? In a shrinking budgetary environment, RPX makes sense and will /should be

more aggressively used in the future.

Benefits of RPX No Federal Screening No Local Redevelopment Authority Planning Process Although time consuming – May be faster than the traditional military construction process No Military Department funds required a project Achieves Dual objectives

Government uses a flexible process to acquire military construction without additional Congressional authorization

Disposal of unneeded, underutilized non-excess facilities

RPX vs. Military Construction Process More flexibility on the identification of requirements No Additional Congressional Authorization Required ( Congressional Notice and Wait

period)


15

Camp Parks Challenges

Size of Parcel – 180 acres Complexity of multiple project agreement Multiple Federal and State Agencies (NASA,

DTSC, EPA) Military Construction Required prior to

Conveyance


16

New Approach to RPX

Phased Transfer Long Term Lease in Furtherance of Conveyance Detailed Community Re-use Alternatives Focus on Construction Costs rather than land

value• Value Engineering


17

REQUIRED DOCUMENTS

Letter Agreement Updated / final 1391s Exchange Agreement Lease in Furtherance Right of Entry Deeds


18

DEVELOPER PARTNER PERSPECTIVE

Frank Faye, Chief Operating Officer, SunCal, Irvine, CA

Joe Guerra, Acquisitions and Entitlements - Northern California SunCal, San Jose, CA

PARKS RESERVE FORCES TRAINING AREA

DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA

WHAT DREW SUNCAL TO THE ARMY RPX OFFERING

Projected Growth in Greater San Francisco Bay Area

Dublin

PLANNING HISTORY OF THE DUBLIN PROJECT

•City has worked with the Army Reserve for 10 years•Previous direction for new community – Alternative 5

2011 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 22

22

ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

FUNDED COMPLETELY BY SUNCAL• New main gate and 4,300 sf administrative building

• 33,000 sf area maintenance support facility

• 33,000 sf regional medical training facility

• 42,000 sf Army Reserve training facility

• 40,000 sf public works/logistics warehouse

• Variety of road and utilities infrastructure construction and improvements


23

FIRST NEW CAMP PARKS FACILITYNew Main Gate and Administration Building


24

LARGEST LAND EXCHANGE IN U.S. ARMY RESERVE HISTORY

• A new paradigm for the Army/DOD in financing military base construction

• New Army facilities at no monetary cost to taxpayers and only a positive impact to the Federal budget

• A new model of private sector/public sector cooperation• Creates private and public land-use opportunities which provide

much-needed new housing municipal amenities, new private-sector employment and jobs

• An example of how the Army, the local municipality (Dublin in Northern California Bay Area) and a major land developer (SunCal) can work cooperatively to achieve each party’s goals and needs

THE NEW SUNCAL DUBLIN CROSSING


26

THE RPX PROCESS AND LESSONS LEARNED

Date post:	17-Dec-2015
Category:	Documents
Upload:	martin-daniels
View:	215 times
Download:	4 times

C AMP P ARKS R EAL P ROPERTY E XCHANGE An Innovative Approach for MILCON July 19, 2011.

Documents