This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/acceptedfor publication in the following source:
Perin, Igor, Walker, Geoff, & Ledwich, Gerard(2019)Load sharing and wayside battery storage for improving AC railway net-work performance, with generic model for capacity estimation, Part 1.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 66(3), Article number:8365150 1791-1798.
This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/119423/
c© Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters
This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under aCreative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use andthat permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu-ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then referto the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog-nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe thatthis work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected]
Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record(i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub-mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) canbe identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear-ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2838066
1
Abstract— Load sharing between feeder stations has the ability to significantly improve the performance of AC electric railways by reducing the number of the traction power network grid connections and minimizing losses and plant sizes. The existing Rail Power Conditioner (RPC) technology, traditionally used for load balancing, is investigated from the new perspective of providing reactive voltage support and active power sharing between stations. The concept is validated through a feasibility study conducted for a heavy haul AC railway network.
Index Terms—traction, power, network, railway, rail
power conditioner
I. INTRODUCTION
INCE their origins in the 1840s, electric railways have
evolved through the early DC traction power networks
to the now prevalent AC systems [1-3]. The original DC
networks are still in use in railways where power demand
and distance are not critical, such as metro and light rail,
while AC systems are preferred for applications requiring
long distances and high power, such as high speed
commuter and freight trains.
This paper focuses on the AC electric railway networks.
The AC traction network used for the French TGV railway
is presented by Roussel [4], and Nugent details the
Australian heavy haul electric railway, operating in central
Queensland [5].
The paper is the first part of a two paper set. Part 1
focuses on improving the performance of AC electric
railways through load sharing via Rail Power Conditioners.
The second part looks at further improvements through
wayside energy storage.
A. Traditional AC Traction Power System
Electric locomotives are supplied using an overhead line
(OHL) network, fed from the utility transmission or
Manuscript received 12 Oct 2017, revised 20 Mar 2018, accepted 02
May 2018.
I.Perin is with Aurizon, Brisbane, 4000, Australia ([email protected]) G.R.Walker and G.Ledwich are with the School of Electrical
Engineering and Computer Science, Queensland University of Technology,
Brisbane, 4000, Australia (e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]).
distribution grid, via feeder stations located alongside the
rail corridor. Track section cabins (TSCs) are positioned in
between feeder stations to facilitate sectioning.
AC locomotives are almost universally implemented as
single phase electric loads and, consequently, the entire
traction power network is a single phase system. Each
feeder station contains typically two single phase power
transformers fed from a pair of phases sourced from the
three phase HV grid side. The adjacent power transformers
are always connected to alternate phases of the utility grid to
avoid feeding the entire traction network from a single pair
of phases. This prevents paralleling of any two adjacent
power transformers, be it at one feeder station or at
neighboring feeder stations, meaning that each power
transformer feeds a radial section, isolated from the rest of
the network.
This is illustrated in Figure 1, where the power
transformer from Feeder Station 1, connected to phases B, C
feeds the section between Feeder Station 1 and the Track
Section Cabin and similar applies to Feeder Station 2 power
transformer connected to phases C, A. The bus section
breakers at both Feeder Stations and the Track Section
Cabin are normally open with neutral sections preventing
the locomotives from bridging two adjacent feeding
segments. Train loads can never be shared by two or more
power transformers. This feeding arrangement is commonly
referred to as the “V/V” connection.
B. Rail Power Conditioners
The single phase railway network invariably creates load
unbalance in the upstream three phase utility grid. Special
transformer connections have been developed over the years
to alleviate the problem of unbalanced loads [6, 7]. A
commonly used arrangement is the Scott transformer,
installed between a three phase source grid and two single
phase legs of the traction network. If the two single phase
legs are equally loaded, the Scott transformer presents a
balanced three phase load to the source side. In practice, the
two load legs are rarely equally loaded, therefore the special
transformer connection, at best, only alleviates the
unbalance problem.
Load Sharing and Wayside Battery Storage for Improving AC Railway Network Performance, with Generic Model for Capacity Estimation,
Part 1
Igor Perin, Aurizon, Geoffrey R Walker, Gerard Ledwich, Queensland University of Technology (QUT)
S
8
IV. CONCLUSIONS
The RPC components and their ratings are dependent on the
particulars of the network, the traffic and the relative location
of the installation.
As the study demonstrates, in this case, reactive support
alone is insufficient, as it fails to adequately improve the
voltage profile and even slightly exacerbates the overloading
of the Norwich Park transformer. The addition of the active
power exchange normalizes the voltage, eliminates the
overloading of the Norwich Park transformer and significantly
reduces the MVA requirements of the converters and the
combined MVAr delivered by the RPC.
The position of the RPC system in this case is determined by
the location of the existing Peak Downs feeder station. A more
convenient location could reduce the component sizing.
Mobile installations, allowing for accurate selection of the
most convenient location to deal with outages would be of
particular interest.
Further improvements in terms of RPC component sizing,
and network performance could be achieved through wayside
large scale energy storage. The energy storage solution is
beyond the scope of this paper and is investigated in a further
publication.
V. REFERENCES
[1] F. Schmid and C. J. Goodman, "Electric railway systems in
common use," in Railway Electrification Infrastructure and
Systems (REIS 2013), 6th IET Professional Development Course on, 2013, pp. 1-15.
[2] R. J. Hill, "Electric railway traction. Part 3. Traction power
supplies," Power Engineering Journal, vol. 8, pp. 275-286, 1994.
[3] B. Bhargava, "Railway electrification systems and configurations,"
in Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 1999. IEEE, 1999,
pp. 445-450 vol.1. [4] H. Roussel, "Power supply for the Atlantic TGV high speed line,"
in Main Line Railway Electrification, 1989., International
Conference on, 1989, pp. 388-392. [5] F. Nugent, "Design, construction and operation of the overhead
fixed equipment for the Queensland Railways main line
electrification project," Helsington, Engl, 1989, pp. 109-113. [6] T. Kneschke, "Control of Utility System Unbalance Caused by
Single-Phase Electric Traction," Industry Applications, IEEE
Transactions on, vol. IA-21, pp. 1559-1570, 1985. [7] H. Cheng-Ping, W. Chi-Jui, C. Yung-Sung, P. Shih-Kai, Y. Jung-
Liang, and H. Ming-Hong, "Loading characteristics analysis of
specially connected transformers using various power factor definitions," Power Delivery, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 21, pp.
1406-1413, 2006.
[8] Y. Mochinaga and T. Uzuka, "Development of Single Phase
Feeding Power Conditioner for Shinkansen Depots," Quarterly
reports of the Railway Technical Research Institute, vol. 41, pp.
154-158, 2000. [9] Z. Dinghua, Z. Zhixue, W. Weian, and Y. Yanling, "Negative
Sequence Current Optimizing Control Based on Railway Static
Power Conditioner in V/v Traction Power Supply System," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 31, pp. 200-212, 2016.
[10] I. Perin, P. F. Nussey, T. V. Tran, U. M. Cella, and G. R. Walker,
"Rail power conditioner technology in Australian Heavy Haul Railway: A case study," in 2015 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power
and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), 2015, pp. 1-5.
[11] L. Qunzhan, L. Wei, S. Zeliang, X. Shaofeng, and Z. Fulin, "Co-phase power supply system for HSR," in Power Electronics
Conference (IPEC-Hiroshima 2014 - ECCE-ASIA), 2014 International, 2014, pp. 1050-1053.
[12] L. Keng-Weng, W. Man-Chung, D. NingYi, W. Chi-Kong, and L.
Chi-Seng, "A Systematic Approach to Hybrid Railway Power
Conditioner Design With Harmonic Compensation for High-Speed
Railway," Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 62, pp. 930-942, 2015.
[13] D. Ning Yi, L. Keng-Weng, and L. Chi-Seng, "Hybrid Railway
Power Conditioner With Partial Compensation for Converter Rating Reduction," Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on,
vol. 51, pp. 4130-4138, 2015.
[14] L. Keng-Weng, W. Man-Chung, D. Ning Yi, W. Chi-Kong, and L. Chi-Seng, "Analysis of DC-Link Operation Voltage of a Hybrid
Railway Power Quality Conditioner and Its PQ Compensation
Capability in High-Speed Cophase Traction Power Supply," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 31, pp. 1643-1656, 2016.
[15] G. H. Narain and G. Laszlo, "Static Shunt Compensators: SVC and STATCOM," in Understanding FACTS Concepts and Technology
of Flexible AC Transmission Systems, ed: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2000,
pp. 135-207. [16] M. H. Haque, "Load flow solution of distribution systems with
voltage dependent load models," Electric Power Systems Research,
vol. 36, pp. 151-156, 1996/03/01 1996. [17] U. Eminoglu and M. H. Hocaoglu, "A new power flow method for
radial distribution systems including voltage dependent load
models," Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 76, pp. 106-114, 2005.
[18] J. R. Martí, H. Ahmadi, and L. Bashualdo, "Linear Power-Flow
Formulation Based on a Voltage-Dependent Load Model," IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 28, pp. 1682-1690, 2013.
[19] C. S. Antunez, O. D. M. Domínguez, J. F. Franco, M. Lavorato,
and M. J. Rider, "Optimal volt-VAr control operation for energy cost reduction in distribution systems considering a voltage
dependent load model," in 2016 IEEE PES Transmission &
Distribution Conference and Exposition-Latin America (PES T&D-LA), 2016, pp. 1-6.
[20] Aurizon. (2017, 28/05/2017). Goonyella System Information Pack
(7.0 ed.). Available: http://www.aurizon.com.au/~/media/aurizon/files/what%20we%20
do/network/network%20downloads/cqcn%20info%20packs/auz01
4_infopack_goonyella_ia_r1.pdf
Igor Perin (M’09) was born in Belgrade, Serbia in 1969. He received his M.S. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Belgrade, Serbia, in 1995. Since 2013, he has been a PhD candidate with the Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. From 1995 to 2000, he was with Energoprojekt, working on electrical power projects in Nigeria, Botswana and Serbia. From 2001 to 2002, he was with UGL in Sydney, Australia, and from 2002 and 2006 he
worked for Powerlink, Brisbane, Australia. Between 2006 and 2008 he worked for WorleyParsons in Brisbane, Australia. Since 2008 he has worked as Senior Electrical Engineer with Aurizon, Brisbane, Australia. His research interests include railway electrification using FACTS technologies and energy storage. Mr. Perin has published a number of papers in the fields of Static Frequency Converters and Rail Power Conditioners for traction power networks.
Geoffrey R. Walker (M’98) was born in Brisbane, Australia in 1969. He received the B.E. degree (Communications and Electronics) and the Ph.D. degree in multilevel converter modulation and control from The University of Queensland (UQ), Brisbane, in 1990 and 1999, respectively. Geoff joined the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) as an Associate Professor in 2013, and currently serves as the leader of the
Power Engineering discipline. From 2008 to 2013, he worked as a senior electrical engineering consultant in Aurecon’s Transmission and Distribution group, Brisbane, across various areas including rail traction, earthing studies, electricity transmission planning, and
9
renewable energy project design and review. From 1998 to 2007, he was the power electronics lecturer at the University of Queensland. Geoff’s research interests centre on grid interactive power electronic converters such as dSTATCOMs, PV inverters, battery inverters and EV chargers – their design, optimization, and interaction with the LV grid. A second group of project are tied to high power, high bandwidth multilevel converters. Geoff has previously worked in and maintains an active interest in the pro-audio and industrial electronics sectors.
Gerard Ledwich (SM’89) received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia, in 1976. He has been Chair Professor in electrical asset management at Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia, since 1998. He was the Head of the Electrical Engineering Department, University of
Newcastle, from 1997 to 1998. Previously, he was with the University of Queensland from 1976 to 1994. His research interests are in the areas of power systems, power electronics, and controls. Dr. Ledwich is a Fellow with the Institute of Engineers, Australia.