Date post: | 05-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | harold-richardson |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass
at the LHC
Kate Mackay
University of Bristol
On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations
EPS Aachen, July 2003
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
Outline
The Atlas and CMS Detectors
W Mass Measurement of the W mass Errors on W mass measurement
Top Physics Top Quark Mass measurements Errors on top mass measurement Single top quark production
Triple Gauge Boson Couplings WW ZZ and Z
Summary
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
The Atlas DetectorInner Detector:Silicon pixels and stripsTransition radiation trackerEM Calorimeter:Sampling Pb/LAr
Hadron Calorimeters:Barrel: Fe/Scintillating
tiles
Endcaps: Cu & W /LArMuon Spectrometer:Drift tubes & Cathode strip Tubes, resistive plate
chambers
Magnet: 2T Solenoid
)(
%10
GeVEE
03.0)(
%50
GeVEE
%32 Tp
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
The CMS DetectorInner Detector:Silicon pixels and strips
Preshower:Lead and silicon strips
EM Calorimeter:Lead Tungstate
Hadron Calorimeters:Barrel & Endcap: Cu/Scintillating sheets
Forward:Steel and Quartz fibre
Muon Spectrometer:Drift tubes, cathode strip chambers and resistive platechambers
Magnet: 4T Solenoid
%2)(
%5
GeVEE
%5)(
%65
GeVEE
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
Precision of the W MassThe W mass is known with a precision
of
± 34 MeV from LEP2 and the Tevatron -
What is the motivation for improving
at the LHC? Higgs mass estimation Radiative corrections
For equal weights in a 2 test:
If Mt ~ 2 GeV at the LHC, we
require
MW ~ 15 MeV
W Transverse Mass Distribution including
expected detector resolution
rGM
WF
W
1sin
1.
2
)cos1(2 TlT
WT ppM
Measurement of the W mass is performed in
the leptonic channels using the transverse
mass:
tW MxM 2107.0
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
Precision of the W MassCuts:
Isolated charged lepton pT > 25 GeV || <
2.4
Missing transverse energy ETMiss > 25 GeV
No jets with pT > 30 GeV
Recoil < 20GeV
Sources of Uncertainty: Statistical uncertainty
pp W + X = 30 nb (l= e,)
W ll 3 x 108 events
< 2MeV for 10 fb-1 Systematic Error
Detector performance
Physics
Source MW
(MeV)
Statistics 2
E-p scale 15
Energy resolution 5
Recoil model 5
Lepton identification 5
pTW 5
Parton distribution functions
10
W width 7
Radiative decays 10
Background 5
Total 25
Reduces the error on log MH from
0.2 to 0.1
1 year, 1 lepton species: 25 MeV
Combining lepton channels: 20 MeV
Combining experiments: 15 MeV
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
Top Mass Together with MW helps to
constrain the SM Higgs mass
tt production: main background to new physics processes: production and decay of Higgs bosons and SUSY particles
Top events used to calibrate the calorimeter jet scale
Precision measurements in the top sector provide information of the fermion mass hierarchy
At low luminosity:
Semi-leptonic: best channel for top mass
measurement (pure hadronic channel can
also be used)
Error dominated by systematic errors: Jet energy scale Final state gluon radiation
tt leptonic decays
(t bW)
Single lepton
W l, W jj
29.6 %
2.5 x 106 events
Di-lepton
W l, W l
4.9 %
400,000 events
eventsxpbttppNLO6108833)(
--
qqbblWbbWtt
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
Top Mass Measurements
Predicted error on the top mass measurement from the semi-leptonic channel of 1.3 GeV
(Di-leptonic channel: 2 GeV)
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
Single Top Quark Production Probe the t-W-b vertex
Direct measurement of the CKM matrix element Vtb
(t) |Vtb|
New Physics – heavy Vector Boson W’
Source of high polarized tops
Background: tt-, Wbb-, Wjj
Tevatron: (t) ~ (t-) LHC: (t) ~ 1.5 (t-)
LHC provides a new scenario for
single top quark production.
(pb) D0 CDF LHCWg <22 <13 245Wt - - 60W* <17 <18 10
For each process: |Vtb|2
Systematic errors: B-jet tagging, luminosity,
theoretical (dominates Vtb measurements)
Process S/B S/√B Vtb/Vtb
Statistical
Vtb/Vtb
Theory
W-g 4.9 239 0.51% 7.5%
Wt 0.24 25 2.2% 9.5%
W* 0.55 22 2.8% 3.8%
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
WW VertexParameters and are related to
physical properties of the W boson.
They are CP-conserving couplings and
relate to the electric quadrupole
moment of the W (QW) and its
magnetic dipole moment (W)
In the SM =1 ( = 0) and
=0 at
tree level.
Anomalous contribution is enhanced
at high √s
Observing the anomalies: pT distribution Radiation zero (,l) MT distribution Angular distribution W
Shaded = SM Clear = = 0.01
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
Limits on W pT Cuts: () > 100 GeV, (l) > 25
GeV,
pT miss > 50 GeV
Jet veto R(,l) > 0.7
MT (l ,pT miss) > 90 GeV
LHC Limits for 10 fb-1 and 100 fb-1
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
ZZ & Z VerticesAnomalous couplings are hV
i (i = 1-4, V
=
Z, )
hV3 and hV
4 are the CP-conserving couplings
and hV1 and hV
2 are the CP-violating couplings
relating to the transition moments of the Z
Observing the anomalies: pT distribution MT distribution
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
ZZ & Z Vertices Main Backgrounds
Z + JetZ
Cuts
|,l | < 2.4
pT > 100 GeV
pTl > 25 GeV
R(,l) > 0.7MT (ll) > 100 GeV
Predicted Limits = 1 TeV
= 3 TeV
Typically order of magnitude improvement
hZ3 hZ
4
10 fb-1 ± 2.0 x 10-2 ± 8.2 x 10-4
100 fb-1 ± 7.8 x 10-3 ± 3.6 x 10-4
hZ3 hZ
4
10 fb-1 ± 2.3 x 10-3 ± 1.9 x 10-5
100 fb-1 ± 1.5 x 10-3 ± 8.5 x 10-6
C. K. Mackay EPS 2003
Summary LHC: precision measurements, unexplored kinematic
regions, high-statistics (W, Z, b, t factory)
W Mass: Measured with a precision of ~ 15 MeV
(Combining lepton channels and both Atlas and CMS)
Top Mass: Measured with a precision of ~ 1.3 GeV
Higgs Mass:
Together MW and Mt improve error on log MH ~ 50%.
Triple Gauge Couplings: WW: Anomalies clearly observed in pT() distribution ZZ: Anomalies clearly observed in pT() and MT(ll) distribution Predicted Limits: ~ order of magnitude improvement