+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CA Final (Nov. 2016) - · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he...

CA Final (Nov. 2016) - · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he...

Date post: 07-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: nguyenkhuong
View: 218 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
36
CA Final (Nov. 2016) With Full Analysis Paper-2 Strategic Financial Management (SFM)
Transcript
Page 1: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks

CA Final (Nov. 2016)

With Full Analysis

Paper-2

Strategic FinancialManagement (SFM)

You attempted for around 64 marks and received 42. this is fair . Plus you could have saved 11 marks and thats 42+11=53 Marks out of 64.You are good at all the points. Just try to solve the entire paper and you will easily score exemption. Plus don’t ignore Theory Portion of SFM.
You could have saved 11 marks in total with small care.
Page 2: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 3: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
This answer is clear
Page 4: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 5: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
This Answer is Clean - Got Full Marks
Page 6: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 7: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 8: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 9: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 10: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
The presentation part in this answer is totally rough. Still the methods and answer is correct. Got Full Marks.
Page 11: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 12: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 13: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 14: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
The answer is clean , got full marks
Page 15: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
ICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it.
ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 16: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 17: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
this is covariance not beta
this is covariance not beta
this is weighted average of covariance not weighted average of beta
Page 18: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
There is no such formula for BETA calculation. Lack of Conceptual Clarity
Page 19: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
4.8 and 4.25 are the variances, the same here has been used as Standard Deviation , which is wrong
Page 20: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
There are lot of conceptual mistakes in the answers.
Page 21: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Similar problem is there in the study material , lack of practice in such questions has resulted into loss of marks here.Lost 6 marks because one mistake in how to adjust Inflation.
You could have saved 6 marks here
Page 22: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 23: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Clean answer, got full marks. well done
Page 24: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
You totally ignored the financials of the new product in this question. other wise all other calculations are correct. Could have saved 5 marks by adding profit of 24 lakhs from new product sales in 143 Lakhs of existing profit.
You could have saved 5 marks here
Page 25: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 26: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 27: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 28: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 29: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 30: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 31: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 32: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 33: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 34: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 35: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
Page 36: CA Final (Nov. 2016) -   · PDF fileICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it. ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks

Recommended