Date post: | 31-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | barry-mosley |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 2 times |
CALAFCo Conference 2006CALAFCo Conference 2006
“Creating & RestoringSustainable Public Agencies”Moderator Josh Susman
City Member, Nevada LAFCo & CALAFCo Board of Directors
Panel Peter KampaGeneral Manager, Twain Harte Community Services District
Walter KieserManaging Principal, Economic and Planning Systems
SR JonesExecutive Officer, Nevada LAFCo
IntroductionIntroduction
Californians are served by over 3,400 Special Districts and over 475 Cities
Half the state’s LAFCos reported over 600 Districts serving populations of fewer than 10,000
All face fiscal and organizational challenges
ChallengesChallenges
Eroding and inflexible revenue base Statutory restrictions on revenue (Prop. 218) Increasing costs and service demands Increasing State and Federal regulatory
requirements
These challenges effect all agencies, but small agencies have fewer resources to meet them
Panel ObjectivesPanel Objectives
We hope to accomplish in this afternoon’s discussion:
Identify and Discuss Issues Related to Size Suggest Criteria to Determine Adequate
SizeSuggest Standards to Avoid Creating
Unsustainable DistrictsSuggest Options for Service Provision
LAFCo’s MissionLAFCo’s Mission
Avoid Duplication of Service ProvidersAlternatively, Expand or Modify Existing
Agencies When PossibleDetermine fiscal feasibility
Promote efficient, economical services
Promote Accountable Governance
Is Small Beautiful?Is Small Beautiful?
Small agencies are often especially responsive to their citizens, but often face size-related constraints in these areas:
FundingInfrastructureManagement Governance
Obstacles Obstacles
Inability to raise funding commensurate with service responsibilities and obligations
Inability to comply with Brown Act, Public Records Act, and other reporting requirements
Inability to meet State and federal regulations (e.g. Clean Water Act, etc.)
Inability to maintain continuity of management and elected representation
Inability to maintain infrastructure
Survey DataSurvey Data
Informal August 2006 Survey of CALAFCo Members
28 LAFCos Responded – approximately half
These LAFCos reported 607 Districts with Populations of Less than 10,000
178 with less than 500 212 with populations of 500 – 2000 217 with populations of 2000 - 10000
Survey DataSurvey Data
LAFCo Staff Reported Challenges in Four Broad Categories:
FundingInfrastructureManagement Governance
Funding RestrictionsFunding Restrictions
Revenue Sources are restricted due to a variety of circumstances:
Statutory restrictions (e.g. Prop 218) Lack of political support for raising fees and taxes Lack of State and federal grant programs
(enjoyed in the past)
Small agencies often lack personnel that could help them expand their revenue sources through grants or loans, or to raise assessments or taxes.
Consequences of Funding Consequences of Funding RestrictionsRestrictions
Restrictions on Funding Limit the Agency’s Ability to:
Fund Operations and MaintenanceProvide for Personnel Finance Administrative Costs
InfrastructureInfrastructure
Fiscal Constraints Result in Deferred or Under-funded Capital Programs:
Deferred MaintenanceDeteriorating Facilities and Equipment Inadequate or non-existent Capital
Replacement Funds Inability to finance upgrades to meet more
rigorous state and federal regulations
ManagementManagement
Insufficient or non-existent staffing
Inability to comply with reporting requirements Annual or bi-annual audits Brown Act, Public Records Act State Filings, Local and Public Requests for
information
GovernanceGovernance
Difficulty Filling Board Member Seats Inability to provide adequate training Potential conflicts of interestSmall pool of potential elected officials
IndicatorsIndicators
… What constitutes a small agency? …
Municipal Incorporation 500 Voter Minimum Statutory Fiscal Tests
Independent Special District Dependent Special District
Size MattersSize MattersDetermining When Size is a Factor
Different based on district type• <500 in cemetery, RCD, lighting district may work
(no/small staff)• <500 risky with Water/sewer districts
– requires infrastructure, management and operation staff
• <500 CSD works (barely)– With multiple services, staff, broad revenue base
• <500 Fire district costly– Equipment and station alone =$250 + per YR
Household income a factor• Retirement VS. Working family
Administrative Costs - ExampleAdministrative Costs - ExampleAssumptions:
Reclamation district with no state or federal permits Serving 200 to 500 properties No agency staff, all contract One phone line, one computer and printer Minimal leased office space 2000 annual copies and 5 mailings to customers Contract manager @ $40 per hour for 700 hours
annually (grant writing and administration, prepare policies and contracts for Board decisions)
3 hours per month clerical work to prepare meeting minutes and mailings
Baseline CostsBaseline Costs$49,110 per year
Per-capita Annual Share of the Burden:
10,000 Households = $4.91 5,000 Households = $9.82 2,000 Households = $24.56 500 Households = $98.22
Problem IndicatorsProblem IndicatorsFinancial Indicators
Are reserves depleted? Is the depletion planned?
Are reserves being used to fund operations?Has the district borrowed money to meet
operating expenses? Is the district unable to finance projects that
are critical to its mission?Are audits not being completed?Did the district receive an unfavorable audit
and management letter?
Indicators Indicators
Pending Actions Against AgencyHas the district been the subject of
ongoing regulatory body investigations which have resulted in consistent findings of mismanagement?
Has the district experienced votes of no confidence from other entities, or citizens?
Are there pending legal actions
IndicatorsIndicatorsOrganizational Indicators
Is the district unable to fund staff critical to delivery of its services?
Does the district have unusually high employee turnover?
Are there multiple HR related lawsuits?Does the district provide the services and
programs it set out to provide?Are claims or litigation increasing? Is the district unable to fill seats on its Board of
Directors?
Action OptionsAction Options
LAFCos have authority to manage size-related deficiencies of local agencies.
This authority differs between existing and prospective agencies.
Thoughtful intervention and actions can avoid documented problems of small agencies.
Action OptionsAction Options
For Existing Agencies with problems:Use the MSR & SOI process to identify
problems and optionsProvide technical Assistance or facilitate
inter-agency cooperationEncourage functional or actual
consolidation Initiate Dissolution and reassignment of
functions
Action OptionsAction OptionsFor organizing new agencies: Guide prospective applicants towards
appropriate service & governance solution(s) Follow statutory standards and procedures for
determining fiscal feasibility Expand your LAFCo’s policy regarding
formations -- Consider operational & governance as well as
fiscal standards Establish minimum size standards for various
agency types