+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Calc. Referefces

Calc. Referefces

Date post: 03-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: luchibabez
View: 226 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 21

Transcript
  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    1/21

    Results

    Head loss through smooth and rough pipes and the relationship between the

    friction factor ( f) and Re number:

    The determination of the experimental head loss for the smooth and rough pipes was

    determined through the following equation:

    [1]

    Where; is converted from (cm H2O) to (!m2)" which is equivalent to (#a) using $quation

    2" is the densit% of the water" which equal to &&'*'& +g!m," and is the gravit% in (m!s2)

    The theoretical head loss was calculated using the pipe friction equation -elow (h theo)

    Where; f is the friction .actor" / is the length of the pipe (all pipes are 0 m long)"

    and 1 is the inner diameter of pipe (m)

    The velocit% of the flow rate (m!s) was calculated using $quation *

    [2]

    Where; is the volumetric flow rate of the water in (m,!s)

    Then 3e%nolds num-er needed to -e calculated using $quation 4 in order to find the

    friction factor (f) for all pipes (except the first pipe (d = 17mm)) from mood% chart

    5lso the relative roughness needed to -e calculated using $quation 6

    [2]

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    2/21

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    3/21

    Ta-le 0 shows" the pressure drop for each flow rate in (#a)" the experimental head loss" and

    the percentage error -etween the theoretical and experimental head loss The friction factor

    for this pipe is calculated using the following correlation" not from mood% chart -ecause thevalue of relative roughness is outside the range of mood% chart

    [2]

    Figure 1: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for rough pipe (D = 17

    mm)!

    .igure 0 are o-tained -% plotting the experimental and theoretical head loss in (m) versus the

    water flow rate in (m,!s)" while figure 2 represent the relation -etween the friction factor and

    3e%nolds9s num-er" which is as 3e%nolds9s num-er increase" the friction factor decrease

    3

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    4/21

    Figure ": Relation betweenf andRe for rough pipe (D = 17 mm)!

    Table ": Data needed to calculate hexpfor rough pipe (D = "& mm) with rough () = 1!1" mm!

    #

    $%min#

    (m&%s)

    D

    (m)u (m%s) Re

    '

    (cm

    "o)

    '

    (a)

    hexp(m)

    %D fhtheo(m)

    *

    error

    00.000

    33

    2

    ,

    0.80229

    403

    19164.8

    8365

    490.33

    25

    0.0501

    31

    0.0486

    96

    0.017

    24

    0.0983

    64

    49.035

    46

    5

    0.000

    422,

    1.00286

    753

    23956.1

    0449.7

    951.24

    51

    0.0972

    54

    0.0486

    96

    0.017

    19

    0.1532

    48

    36.538

    37

    00.000

    50

    2

    ,

    1.20344

    104

    28747.3

    25314.5

    1421.9

    64

    0.1453

    8

    0.0486

    96

    0.017

    16

    0.2202

    93

    34.006

    13

    50.000

    58

    2

    ,

    1.40401

    455

    33538.5

    46220.5

    2010.3

    63

    0.2055

    37

    0.0486

    96

    0.017

    14

    0.2994

    93

    31.371

    85

    00.000

    67

    2

    ,

    1.60458

    805

    38329.7

    67127

    2647.7

    96

    0.2707

    07

    0.0486

    96

    0.017

    12

    0.3907

    19

    30.715

    61

    4

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    5/21

    Figure &: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for rough pipe (D = "& mm)!

    Figure +: Relation betweenf andRe for rough pipe (D = "& mm)!

    For ,mooth ipes:

    .or smooth pipes the roughness of the pipe (8) equal ero

    Table &: Data needed to calculate hexpfor ,mooth pipe (D = -!. mm)!

    #

    ($%min

    )

    #

    (m&%s

    )

    D

    (m) u (m%s) Re

    '

    (cm

    "o)

    '

    (a)

    hexp(m)

    f

    htheo(

    m)

    *

    error

    70.000

    12

    64

    3.51585

    181

    23734.9

    712171.5

    16818

    .4

    1.719

    49

    0.00636

    4729

    2.467

    679

    30.31

    953

    5

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    6/21

    90.000

    15

    64

    4.52038

    09

    30516.3

    915238.6

    23398

    .67

    2.392

    247

    0.00597

    7145

    3.830

    818

    37.55

    257

    110.000

    18

    64

    5.52490

    999

    37297.8

    118350

    34323

    .28

    3.509

    164

    0.00568

    4683

    5.442

    573

    35.52

    381

    130.000

    22

    64

    6.52943

    908

    44079.2

    322450.1

    44139

    .73

    4.512

    785

    0.00545

    216

    7.290

    679

    38.10

    199

    170.000

    28

    64

    8.53849

    726

    57642.0

    728737

    72275

    .01

    7.389

    297

    0.00509

    8497

    11.65

    877

    36.62

    026

    Figure .: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for,mooth pipe (D = -!. mm)!

    Figure -: Relation betweenf andRe for smooth pipe (D = -!. mm)!

    6

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    7/21

    Table +: Data needed to calculate hexpfor ,mooth pipe (D = 1-!. mm)!

    #

    ($%m

    in)

    #

    (m&%s

    )

    D

    (m)u (m%s) Re

    '

    (cm

    "o)

    '

    (a)

    hexp(m)

    fhtheo(m)

    *

    error

    20 0.000

    33

    0

    64

    1.55891

    107

    26714.6

    86216.6 1627.

    904

    0.166

    435

    0.006179

    304

    0.185

    549

    10.301

    65

    250.000

    42

    0

    64

    1.94863

    884

    33393.3

    57727.7

    2716.

    442

    0.277

    725

    0.005844

    025

    0.274

    19

    1.2893

    05

    300.000

    50

    0

    64

    2.33836

    661

    40072.0

    29238.2

    3746.

    140.383

    0.005583

    632

    0.377

    241

    1.5266

    38

    350.000

    58

    0

    64

    2.72809

    438

    46750.7

    00852

    5099.

    458

    0.521

    362

    0.005372

    545

    0.494

    056

    5.5268

    81

    400.000

    67

    0

    64

    3.11782

    215

    53429.3

    72367

    6570.

    456

    0.671

    754

    0.005196

    155

    0.624

    111

    7.6337

    95

    Figure 7: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for,mooth pipe (D = 1-!. mm)!

    7

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    8/21

    Figure /: Relation betweenf andRe for smooth pipe (D = 1-!. mm)!

    Table .: Data needed to calculate hexpfor ,mooth pipe (D = "-!- mm)!

    #

    ($%mi

    n)

    #

    (m&%s

    )

    D

    (m)

    u

    (m%s)Re

    '

    (cm

    "o)

    '

    (a)

    hexp(m)

    fhtheo(m)

    *

    error

    200.000

    33

    2

    66

    0.59982

    693

    16571.1

    3990.2

    19.61

    33

    0.002

    005

    0.006962

    881

    0.019

    201

    89.556

    52

    250.000

    42

    2

    66

    0.74978

    366

    20713.9

    2491.2

    117.6

    798

    0.012

    031

    0.006585

    087

    0.028

    373

    57.596

    27

    300.000

    50

    2

    66

    0.89974

    039

    24856.7

    0992.2

    215.7

    463

    0.022

    058

    0.006291

    674

    0.039

    037

    43.496

    11

    35

    0.000

    58 266

    1.04969

    712

    28999.4

    9493.7

    362.8

    461

    0.037

    097

    0.006053

    82

    0.051

    125

    27.439

    46

    400.000

    67

    2

    66

    1.19965

    385

    33142.2

    7985

    490.3

    325

    0.050

    131

    0.005855

    062

    0.064

    584

    22.378

    35

    8

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    9/21

    Figure 0: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for,mooth pipe (D = "-!- mm)!

    Figure 1: Relation betweenf andRe for smooth pipe (D = "-!- mm)!

    Determine the head loss for the fittings:

    The experimental resistance coefficient () for a fitting can -e calculated from

    following correlation

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    10/21

    Kexp = (>)

    For the 2al3es:

    Table -: Data needed to calculate hexpand4expfor gate 3al3e (D = "& mm)!

    #

    $%mi

    )

    #

    (m&%

    s)

    D

    (m)

    u

    (m%s)Re

    '

    (cm

    "o)

    '

    (a)

    hexp(m)

    4exp4th

    5.6

    htheo(m)

    h *

    error

    4 *

    error

    00.00

    033

    2,

    0.802

    7

    1917

    4.59

    0.219.61

    33

    0.0020

    05237

    0.061

    06

    0

    ,

    0.004

    2692

    53.03

    066

    53.03

    066

    50.00

    042

    2,

    1.003

    375

    2396

    8.241.2

    117.6

    798

    0.0120

    3142

    0.234

    471

    0

    ,

    0.006

    6707

    -

    80.36

    23

    -

    80.36

    23

    00.00

    050

    2,

    1.204

    05

    2876

    1.882.7

    264.7

    796

    0.0270

    70695

    0.366

    361

    0

    ,

    0.009

    6058

    -

    181.8

    16

    -

    181.8

    16

    50.00

    058

    2,

    1.404

    725

    3355

    5.534

    392.2

    66

    0.0401

    04734

    0.398

    76

    0

    ,

    0.013

    0746

    -

    206.7

    39

    -

    206.7

    39

    00.00

    067

    2,

    1.605

    401

    3834

    9.186.1

    598.2

    057

    0.0611

    59719

    0.465

    584

    0

    ,

    0.017

    077

    -

    258.1

    41

    -

    258.1

    41

    The average experimental fitting constant equals to 0.305247

    10

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    11/21

    Figure 11: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) forgate 3al3e (D = "& mm)!

    .igure 00 illustrate that the difference -etween the theoretical and experimental head

    loss at each flow rate

    Table 7: Data needed to calculate hexpand4expfor ball 3al3e (D = " mm)!

    #

    $%mi

    n)

    #

    (m&%

    s)

    D

    (m)

    u

    (m%s)Re

    '

    (cm

    "o)

    '

    (a)

    hexp(m)

    4exp

    4t

    heo

    htheo(m)

    h *

    error

    4 *

    error

    00.00

    033

    2

    1.061

    571

    2205

    0.780.7

    68.64

    655

    0.0070

    18328

    0.122

    19

    0.

    16

    0.009

    1901

    23.63

    146

    23.631

    46

    50.00

    042

    2

    1.326

    964

    2756

    3.472

    196.1

    33

    0.0200

    52367

    0.223

    433

    0.

    16

    0.014

    3595

    -

    39.64

    53

    -

    39.645

    3

    00.00

    050

    2

    1.592

    357

    3307

    6.163.4

    333.4

    261

    0.0340

    89024

    0.263

    775

    0.

    16

    0.020

    6777

    -

    64.85

    91

    -

    64.859

    1

    5 0.00

    058

    2

    1.857

    749

    3858

    8.86

    5.4 529.5

    591

    0.0541

    4139

    0.307

    79

    0.

    16

    0.028

    1446

    -

    92.36

    -

    92.368

    11

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    12/21

    86 6

    00.00

    067

    2

    2.123

    142

    4410

    1.557.5

    735.4

    988

    0.0751

    96376

    0.327

    294

    0.

    16

    0.036

    7603

    -

    104.5

    59

    -

    104.55

    9

    The average experimental fitting constant equals to 0.248896

    Figure 1": The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for ball 3al3e (D = " mm)!

    Table /: Data needed to calculate hexpand4expfor angle 3al3e (D = 1. mm)!

    #

    ($%mi

    n)

    #

    (m&%

    s)

    D

    (m)

    u

    (m%s)Re

    '

    (cm

    "o)

    '

    (a)

    hexp(m)

    4exp

    4t

    heo

    5.6

    htheo(m

    )

    h *

    error

    4 *

    error

    200.00

    033

    04

    1.887

    238

    2940

    1.04

    26.32579.

    149

    0.2636

    88624

    1.452

    571

    ,

    0.544

    5972

    51.58

    098

    51.58

    098

    250.00

    042

    04

    2.359

    047

    3675

    1.2942.8

    4197.

    246

    0.4291

    2065

    1.512

    883

    ,

    0.850

    9331

    49.57

    058

    49.57

    058

    300.00

    050

    04

    2.830

    856

    4410

    1.5562.5

    6129.

    156

    0.6266

    36463

    1.534

    19

    ,

    1.225

    3437

    48.86

    035

    48.86

    035

    350.00

    058

    04

    3.302

    666

    5145

    1.8186.5

    8482.

    752

    0.8672

    64865

    1.559

    989

    ,

    1.667

    8289

    48.00

    037

    48.00

    037

    12

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    13/21

    400.00

    067

    04

    3.774

    475

    5880

    2.07114

    1117

    9.58

    1.1429

    84909

    1.574

    078

    ,

    2.178

    3887

    47.53

    072

    47.53

    072

    The average experimental fitting constant equals to 1.526742

    Figure 1&: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for angle seat 3al3e (D = 1. mm)!

    Table 0: Data needed to calculate hexpand4expfor Diaphragm 3al3e (D = " mm)!

    #

    $%mi

    )

    #

    (m&%s

    )

    D

    (m

    )

    u

    (m%s)Re

    '

    (cm

    "o)

    '

    (a)

    hexp(m)

    4exp4th5+6

    htheo(m)

    h *

    error

    4 *

    error

    00.00

    033

    0.

    02

    1.061

    571

    2205

    0.7815.1

    1480.

    804

    0.15139

    537

    2.635

    806

    2,

    0.132

    1074

    -

    14.60

    02

    -

    14.60

    02

    50.00

    042

    0.

    02

    1.326

    964

    2756

    3.4725

    2451.

    663

    0.25065

    4585

    2.792

    907

    2,

    0.206

    4178

    -

    21.43

    07

    -

    21.43

    07

    00.00

    050

    0.

    02

    1.592

    357

    3307

    6.1636.8

    3608.

    847

    0.36896

    355

    2.854

    971

    2,

    0.297

    2416

    -

    24.12

    92

    -

    24.12

    92

    5 0.00

    058

    0.

    02

    1.857

    749

    3858

    8.86

    49.8 4883.

    712

    0.49930

    3934

    2.838

    505

    2,

    0.404

    5788

    -

    23.41

    -

    23.41

    13

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    14/21

    33 33

    00.00

    067

    0.

    02

    2.123

    142

    4410

    1.5567

    6570.

    456

    0.67175

    4289

    2.923

    824

    2,

    0.528

    4295

    -

    27.12

    28

    -

    27.12

    28

    The average experimental fitting constant equals to 2.809203

    Figure 1+: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for diaphragm 3al3e (D=" mm)!

    For the elbows:

    Table 1: Data needed to calculate hexpand4expfor 0 elbow (D = ". mm)!

    14

    ($%min)#

    (m

    &

    %s)

    D

    (m)

    u (m%s) Re'

    (cm "o)

    ' (a)hexp

    (m)

    4exp 5.6 4theo5"6 htheo(

    0.00033 24

    0.679406 17640.62 1.5 147.0998 0.015039275 0.639246 0.74 0.017

    0.00042 24

    0.849257 22050.78 3.4 333.4261 0.034089024 0.927332 0.74 0.027

    0.00050 24

    1.019108 26460.93 6.1 598.2057 0.061159719 1.155377 0.74 0.0391

    0.00058 24

    1.18896 30871.09 9.2 902.2118 0.092240887 1.280231 0.74 0.053

    0.00067 24

    1.358811 35281.24 12.5 1225.831 0.125327293 1.331762 0.74 0.069

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    15/21

    The average experimental fitting constant equals to 1.06679

    Figure 1.: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for0 elbow (D = ". mm)!

    Table 11: Data needed to calculate hexpand4expfor +. elbow (D = ". mm)!

    #

    ($%

    min)

    #

    (m&

    %s)

    D

    (m

    )

    u

    (m%s

    )

    Re

    '

    (cm

    "o

    )

    '

    (a)

    hexp(m)

    4exp

    4

    th

    e

    5.6

    htheo(

    m)

    h *

    erro

    r

    4 *

    erro

    r

    20

    0.0

    003

    3

    24

    0.67

    940

    6

    176

    40.6

    2

    0.9

    88.2

    598

    5

    0.009

    0235

    65

    0.38

    354

    7

    0

    .

    3

    0.00

    7058

    -

    27.8

    491

    -

    27.8

    491

    25

    0.0

    004

    2

    24

    0.84

    925

    7

    220

    50.7

    8

    2.2

    215.

    746

    3

    0.022

    0576

    04

    0.60

    003

    9

    0

    .

    3

    0.01

    1028

    1

    -

    100.

    013

    -

    100.

    013

    30

    0.0

    005

    0

    24

    1.01

    910

    8

    264

    60.9

    3

    3.2

    313.

    812

    8

    0.032

    0837

    87

    0.60

    61

    0

    .

    3

    0.01

    5880

    5

    -

    102.

    033

    -

    102.

    033

    35

    0.0

    005

    8

    24

    1.18

    896

    308

    71.0

    9

    6.1

    598.

    205

    7

    0.061

    1597

    19

    0.84

    884

    9

    0

    .

    3

    0.02

    1615

    1

    -

    182.

    95

    -

    182.

    95

    15

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    16/21

    40

    0.0

    006

    7

    24

    1.35

    881

    1

    352

    81.2

    4

    8.9

    872.

    791

    9

    0.089

    2330

    32

    0.94

    821

    4

    0

    .

    3

    0.02

    8231

    9

    -

    216.

    071

    -

    216.

    071

    The average experimental fitting constant equals to 0.67735

    Figure 1-: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for+. elbow (D = ". mm)!

    16

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    17/21

    Determine the discharge coefficient of orifice and venturi meters:

    To determine the discharge coefficient for the orifice and venturi meters" the

    following equation will -e used

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    18/21

    Ta-le 0, represents the discharge coefficient for the orifice meter at each flow rate"

    and the error -etween them

    18

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    19/21

    ,ample alculation:

    For the rough pipe D=17 mm

    To find the we calculated from:

    .or the first pipe 1 @ 0'mm

    For other pipes from mood chart b getting Renolds number and the relati3e

    roughness

    19

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    20/21

    For the fittings:

    For the gate 3al3e D = "& mm

    htheor=

    Kexp =

    20

  • 8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces

    21/21

    For the 3enturi and orifice meter

    For the orifice meter:

    21


Recommended