Date post: | 03-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | luchibabez |
View: | 226 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 21
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
1/21
Results
Head loss through smooth and rough pipes and the relationship between the
friction factor ( f) and Re number:
The determination of the experimental head loss for the smooth and rough pipes was
determined through the following equation:
[1]
Where; is converted from (cm H2O) to (!m2)" which is equivalent to (#a) using $quation
2" is the densit% of the water" which equal to &&'*'& +g!m," and is the gravit% in (m!s2)
The theoretical head loss was calculated using the pipe friction equation -elow (h theo)
Where; f is the friction .actor" / is the length of the pipe (all pipes are 0 m long)"
and 1 is the inner diameter of pipe (m)
The velocit% of the flow rate (m!s) was calculated using $quation *
[2]
Where; is the volumetric flow rate of the water in (m,!s)
Then 3e%nolds num-er needed to -e calculated using $quation 4 in order to find the
friction factor (f) for all pipes (except the first pipe (d = 17mm)) from mood% chart
5lso the relative roughness needed to -e calculated using $quation 6
[2]
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
2/21
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
3/21
Ta-le 0 shows" the pressure drop for each flow rate in (#a)" the experimental head loss" and
the percentage error -etween the theoretical and experimental head loss The friction factor
for this pipe is calculated using the following correlation" not from mood% chart -ecause thevalue of relative roughness is outside the range of mood% chart
[2]
Figure 1: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for rough pipe (D = 17
mm)!
.igure 0 are o-tained -% plotting the experimental and theoretical head loss in (m) versus the
water flow rate in (m,!s)" while figure 2 represent the relation -etween the friction factor and
3e%nolds9s num-er" which is as 3e%nolds9s num-er increase" the friction factor decrease
3
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
4/21
Figure ": Relation betweenf andRe for rough pipe (D = 17 mm)!
Table ": Data needed to calculate hexpfor rough pipe (D = "& mm) with rough () = 1!1" mm!
#
$%min#
(m&%s)
D
(m)u (m%s) Re
'
(cm
"o)
'
(a)
hexp(m)
%D fhtheo(m)
*
error
00.000
33
2
,
0.80229
403
19164.8
8365
490.33
25
0.0501
31
0.0486
96
0.017
24
0.0983
64
49.035
46
5
0.000
422,
1.00286
753
23956.1
0449.7
951.24
51
0.0972
54
0.0486
96
0.017
19
0.1532
48
36.538
37
00.000
50
2
,
1.20344
104
28747.3
25314.5
1421.9
64
0.1453
8
0.0486
96
0.017
16
0.2202
93
34.006
13
50.000
58
2
,
1.40401
455
33538.5
46220.5
2010.3
63
0.2055
37
0.0486
96
0.017
14
0.2994
93
31.371
85
00.000
67
2
,
1.60458
805
38329.7
67127
2647.7
96
0.2707
07
0.0486
96
0.017
12
0.3907
19
30.715
61
4
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
5/21
Figure &: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for rough pipe (D = "& mm)!
Figure +: Relation betweenf andRe for rough pipe (D = "& mm)!
For ,mooth ipes:
.or smooth pipes the roughness of the pipe (8) equal ero
Table &: Data needed to calculate hexpfor ,mooth pipe (D = -!. mm)!
#
($%min
)
#
(m&%s
)
D
(m) u (m%s) Re
'
(cm
"o)
'
(a)
hexp(m)
f
htheo(
m)
*
error
70.000
12
64
3.51585
181
23734.9
712171.5
16818
.4
1.719
49
0.00636
4729
2.467
679
30.31
953
5
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
6/21
90.000
15
64
4.52038
09
30516.3
915238.6
23398
.67
2.392
247
0.00597
7145
3.830
818
37.55
257
110.000
18
64
5.52490
999
37297.8
118350
34323
.28
3.509
164
0.00568
4683
5.442
573
35.52
381
130.000
22
64
6.52943
908
44079.2
322450.1
44139
.73
4.512
785
0.00545
216
7.290
679
38.10
199
170.000
28
64
8.53849
726
57642.0
728737
72275
.01
7.389
297
0.00509
8497
11.65
877
36.62
026
Figure .: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for,mooth pipe (D = -!. mm)!
Figure -: Relation betweenf andRe for smooth pipe (D = -!. mm)!
6
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
7/21
Table +: Data needed to calculate hexpfor ,mooth pipe (D = 1-!. mm)!
#
($%m
in)
#
(m&%s
)
D
(m)u (m%s) Re
'
(cm
"o)
'
(a)
hexp(m)
fhtheo(m)
*
error
20 0.000
33
0
64
1.55891
107
26714.6
86216.6 1627.
904
0.166
435
0.006179
304
0.185
549
10.301
65
250.000
42
0
64
1.94863
884
33393.3
57727.7
2716.
442
0.277
725
0.005844
025
0.274
19
1.2893
05
300.000
50
0
64
2.33836
661
40072.0
29238.2
3746.
140.383
0.005583
632
0.377
241
1.5266
38
350.000
58
0
64
2.72809
438
46750.7
00852
5099.
458
0.521
362
0.005372
545
0.494
056
5.5268
81
400.000
67
0
64
3.11782
215
53429.3
72367
6570.
456
0.671
754
0.005196
155
0.624
111
7.6337
95
Figure 7: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for,mooth pipe (D = 1-!. mm)!
7
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
8/21
Figure /: Relation betweenf andRe for smooth pipe (D = 1-!. mm)!
Table .: Data needed to calculate hexpfor ,mooth pipe (D = "-!- mm)!
#
($%mi
n)
#
(m&%s
)
D
(m)
u
(m%s)Re
'
(cm
"o)
'
(a)
hexp(m)
fhtheo(m)
*
error
200.000
33
2
66
0.59982
693
16571.1
3990.2
19.61
33
0.002
005
0.006962
881
0.019
201
89.556
52
250.000
42
2
66
0.74978
366
20713.9
2491.2
117.6
798
0.012
031
0.006585
087
0.028
373
57.596
27
300.000
50
2
66
0.89974
039
24856.7
0992.2
215.7
463
0.022
058
0.006291
674
0.039
037
43.496
11
35
0.000
58 266
1.04969
712
28999.4
9493.7
362.8
461
0.037
097
0.006053
82
0.051
125
27.439
46
400.000
67
2
66
1.19965
385
33142.2
7985
490.3
325
0.050
131
0.005855
062
0.064
584
22.378
35
8
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
9/21
Figure 0: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for,mooth pipe (D = "-!- mm)!
Figure 1: Relation betweenf andRe for smooth pipe (D = "-!- mm)!
Determine the head loss for the fittings:
The experimental resistance coefficient () for a fitting can -e calculated from
following correlation
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
10/21
Kexp = (>)
For the 2al3es:
Table -: Data needed to calculate hexpand4expfor gate 3al3e (D = "& mm)!
#
$%mi
)
#
(m&%
s)
D
(m)
u
(m%s)Re
'
(cm
"o)
'
(a)
hexp(m)
4exp4th
5.6
htheo(m)
h *
error
4 *
error
00.00
033
2,
0.802
7
1917
4.59
0.219.61
33
0.0020
05237
0.061
06
0
,
0.004
2692
53.03
066
53.03
066
50.00
042
2,
1.003
375
2396
8.241.2
117.6
798
0.0120
3142
0.234
471
0
,
0.006
6707
-
80.36
23
-
80.36
23
00.00
050
2,
1.204
05
2876
1.882.7
264.7
796
0.0270
70695
0.366
361
0
,
0.009
6058
-
181.8
16
-
181.8
16
50.00
058
2,
1.404
725
3355
5.534
392.2
66
0.0401
04734
0.398
76
0
,
0.013
0746
-
206.7
39
-
206.7
39
00.00
067
2,
1.605
401
3834
9.186.1
598.2
057
0.0611
59719
0.465
584
0
,
0.017
077
-
258.1
41
-
258.1
41
The average experimental fitting constant equals to 0.305247
10
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
11/21
Figure 11: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) forgate 3al3e (D = "& mm)!
.igure 00 illustrate that the difference -etween the theoretical and experimental head
loss at each flow rate
Table 7: Data needed to calculate hexpand4expfor ball 3al3e (D = " mm)!
#
$%mi
n)
#
(m&%
s)
D
(m)
u
(m%s)Re
'
(cm
"o)
'
(a)
hexp(m)
4exp
4t
heo
htheo(m)
h *
error
4 *
error
00.00
033
2
1.061
571
2205
0.780.7
68.64
655
0.0070
18328
0.122
19
0.
16
0.009
1901
23.63
146
23.631
46
50.00
042
2
1.326
964
2756
3.472
196.1
33
0.0200
52367
0.223
433
0.
16
0.014
3595
-
39.64
53
-
39.645
3
00.00
050
2
1.592
357
3307
6.163.4
333.4
261
0.0340
89024
0.263
775
0.
16
0.020
6777
-
64.85
91
-
64.859
1
5 0.00
058
2
1.857
749
3858
8.86
5.4 529.5
591
0.0541
4139
0.307
79
0.
16
0.028
1446
-
92.36
-
92.368
11
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
12/21
86 6
00.00
067
2
2.123
142
4410
1.557.5
735.4
988
0.0751
96376
0.327
294
0.
16
0.036
7603
-
104.5
59
-
104.55
9
The average experimental fitting constant equals to 0.248896
Figure 1": The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for ball 3al3e (D = " mm)!
Table /: Data needed to calculate hexpand4expfor angle 3al3e (D = 1. mm)!
#
($%mi
n)
#
(m&%
s)
D
(m)
u
(m%s)Re
'
(cm
"o)
'
(a)
hexp(m)
4exp
4t
heo
5.6
htheo(m
)
h *
error
4 *
error
200.00
033
04
1.887
238
2940
1.04
26.32579.
149
0.2636
88624
1.452
571
,
0.544
5972
51.58
098
51.58
098
250.00
042
04
2.359
047
3675
1.2942.8
4197.
246
0.4291
2065
1.512
883
,
0.850
9331
49.57
058
49.57
058
300.00
050
04
2.830
856
4410
1.5562.5
6129.
156
0.6266
36463
1.534
19
,
1.225
3437
48.86
035
48.86
035
350.00
058
04
3.302
666
5145
1.8186.5
8482.
752
0.8672
64865
1.559
989
,
1.667
8289
48.00
037
48.00
037
12
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
13/21
400.00
067
04
3.774
475
5880
2.07114
1117
9.58
1.1429
84909
1.574
078
,
2.178
3887
47.53
072
47.53
072
The average experimental fitting constant equals to 1.526742
Figure 1&: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for angle seat 3al3e (D = 1. mm)!
Table 0: Data needed to calculate hexpand4expfor Diaphragm 3al3e (D = " mm)!
#
$%mi
)
#
(m&%s
)
D
(m
)
u
(m%s)Re
'
(cm
"o)
'
(a)
hexp(m)
4exp4th5+6
htheo(m)
h *
error
4 *
error
00.00
033
0.
02
1.061
571
2205
0.7815.1
1480.
804
0.15139
537
2.635
806
2,
0.132
1074
-
14.60
02
-
14.60
02
50.00
042
0.
02
1.326
964
2756
3.4725
2451.
663
0.25065
4585
2.792
907
2,
0.206
4178
-
21.43
07
-
21.43
07
00.00
050
0.
02
1.592
357
3307
6.1636.8
3608.
847
0.36896
355
2.854
971
2,
0.297
2416
-
24.12
92
-
24.12
92
5 0.00
058
0.
02
1.857
749
3858
8.86
49.8 4883.
712
0.49930
3934
2.838
505
2,
0.404
5788
-
23.41
-
23.41
13
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
14/21
33 33
00.00
067
0.
02
2.123
142
4410
1.5567
6570.
456
0.67175
4289
2.923
824
2,
0.528
4295
-
27.12
28
-
27.12
28
The average experimental fitting constant equals to 2.809203
Figure 1+: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for diaphragm 3al3e (D=" mm)!
For the elbows:
Table 1: Data needed to calculate hexpand4expfor 0 elbow (D = ". mm)!
14
($%min)#
(m
&
%s)
D
(m)
u (m%s) Re'
(cm "o)
' (a)hexp
(m)
4exp 5.6 4theo5"6 htheo(
0.00033 24
0.679406 17640.62 1.5 147.0998 0.015039275 0.639246 0.74 0.017
0.00042 24
0.849257 22050.78 3.4 333.4261 0.034089024 0.927332 0.74 0.027
0.00050 24
1.019108 26460.93 6.1 598.2057 0.061159719 1.155377 0.74 0.0391
0.00058 24
1.18896 30871.09 9.2 902.2118 0.092240887 1.280231 0.74 0.053
0.00067 24
1.358811 35281.24 12.5 1225.831 0.125327293 1.331762 0.74 0.069
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
15/21
The average experimental fitting constant equals to 1.06679
Figure 1.: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for0 elbow (D = ". mm)!
Table 11: Data needed to calculate hexpand4expfor +. elbow (D = ". mm)!
#
($%
min)
#
(m&
%s)
D
(m
)
u
(m%s
)
Re
'
(cm
"o
)
'
(a)
hexp(m)
4exp
4
th
e
5.6
htheo(
m)
h *
erro
r
4 *
erro
r
20
0.0
003
3
24
0.67
940
6
176
40.6
2
0.9
88.2
598
5
0.009
0235
65
0.38
354
7
0
.
3
0.00
7058
-
27.8
491
-
27.8
491
25
0.0
004
2
24
0.84
925
7
220
50.7
8
2.2
215.
746
3
0.022
0576
04
0.60
003
9
0
.
3
0.01
1028
1
-
100.
013
-
100.
013
30
0.0
005
0
24
1.01
910
8
264
60.9
3
3.2
313.
812
8
0.032
0837
87
0.60
61
0
.
3
0.01
5880
5
-
102.
033
-
102.
033
35
0.0
005
8
24
1.18
896
308
71.0
9
6.1
598.
205
7
0.061
1597
19
0.84
884
9
0
.
3
0.02
1615
1
-
182.
95
-
182.
95
15
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
16/21
40
0.0
006
7
24
1.35
881
1
352
81.2
4
8.9
872.
791
9
0.089
2330
32
0.94
821
4
0
.
3
0.02
8231
9
-
216.
071
-
216.
071
The average experimental fitting constant equals to 0.67735
Figure 1-: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (#) for+. elbow (D = ". mm)!
16
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
17/21
Determine the discharge coefficient of orifice and venturi meters:
To determine the discharge coefficient for the orifice and venturi meters" the
following equation will -e used
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
18/21
Ta-le 0, represents the discharge coefficient for the orifice meter at each flow rate"
and the error -etween them
18
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
19/21
,ample alculation:
For the rough pipe D=17 mm
To find the we calculated from:
.or the first pipe 1 @ 0'mm
For other pipes from mood chart b getting Renolds number and the relati3e
roughness
19
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
20/21
For the fittings:
For the gate 3al3e D = "& mm
htheor=
Kexp =
20
8/12/2019 Calc. Referefces
21/21
For the 3enturi and orifice meter
For the orifice meter:
21