Caltrans RAP/RAS Specification Overview
Tony Limas
Presentation Overview Definitions
Mix Design Requirements
Binder Testing at Verification/Production
RAP/RAS Requirements
Blending Aggregate
Definitions BR = Binder Replacement:
RAP and RAS BR: Based on % total binder content in mix (OBC)
RAP or RAS Substitution Rate: Based on DWA substituted for virgin aggregate
Static RAP or RAS Stockpile: Stockpiles that have not been augmented or changed while JMF is valid
Blending Aggregate: Used in RAS to enhance flowability
Mix Design
Maximum BR Lower Lift = 40%
• O.2 ft. from finished grade (exclusive of OGFC)
Maximum BR Top Lift = 25%
Up to 5% RAS allowed (based on DWA) RAP limited by maximum allowable BR
Mix OBC based on AASHTO PP 53
PP-53 Shingle Availability Factor ≤ 70 percent
Mix Design (con’t)
When BR is ≤ 25% • Contractor may request to use 1 PG Grade Lower
– Both upper and lower temperature classifications
When using RAP only if BR is >25% and ≤ 40%
• Use1 PG binder grade lower than specified binder – Both upper and lower temperature classifications
When using RAS or RAP/RAS • Recovered binder grade must be:
– Specified binder grade ± 1 PG grade Ex. 64-16 can indicate 70-10 - 58-22
Mix Design (con’t)
When using RAS binder modifiers are allowed • Recycling Agents • Rejuvenators • Wax Products
Must submit binder blending chart(s)
New mix design required if augmented RAP/RAS: • Avg. RAP or RAS binder content ▲> ±2.0% • Avg. RAP or RAS RICE ▲> ±0.60%
Mix Design (con’t)
When Using RAS Submit AASHTO PP 53 Calculations
• RAS aggregate gradation • Percent available RAP/RAS binder • RAS RICE (Gmm) • RAS aggregate specific gravity (Gsb or Gse)
Mix design containing RAS signed by PE or AMRL accredited Lab Mgr.
Mix Design (con’t)
Caltrans Binder Grade Requirements vs. RAP, RAS and RAP/RAS
Mix Type RAP ONLY1 RAS Only2,4 RAP/RAS2, 3, 4
Binder Replacement Binder Replacement Binder Replacement ≤25% 26% to 40% ≤25% 26% to 40% ≤25% 26% to 40%
Surface Courses
No Binder Change
Required (May Request to Drop 1 PG
Grade)
Binder Grade Determined by Blending Chart
Analysis
Binder Grade Determined by Blending Chart
Analysis
Lower Courses
No Binder Change
Required (May Request to Drop 1 PG
Grade)
Required to Drop 1 PG
Grade
Binder Grade Determined by Blending Chart
Analysis
Binder Grade Determined by Blending Chart
Analysis
Binder Grade Determined by Blending Chart
Analysis
Binder Grade Determined by Blending Chart
Analysis
Notes: 1. When only RAP used in mix, max RAP by weight ≤25%. 2. Max RAS by weight ≤5%. 3. No RAP by weight % limit when used in conjunction RAS (binder replacement rules govern). 4. Asphalt binder recovered from plant produced mix must be +/- 1 PG grade of specified binder grade.
Mix Design (con’t)
CEM 3512 - Page 4
Mix Design (con’t)
Blending Charts
High Temperature – G*/sinδ Original Binder
High Temperature – G*/sinδ RTFO Binder
Intermediate Temperature – G*sinδ RTFO Aged Binder
Low Temperature – BBR Stiffness PAV Aged Binder
Low Temperature – m-value PAV Aged Binder
Binder Testing in Production
When mix contains RAS: • Recovered Binder Test Frequency • At mix verification (Engineer) • At start-up evaluation1 (Contractor/Engineer) • 1/10,000 tons of HMA production2
– 1 Waived if <30 Days From Mix Verification Date – 2 1/per Project if RAS Stockpile is Static (not augmented)
RAP/RAS Requirements
Coarse RAP Percent Passing Quality Characteristic Test Method Requirement
1 ½ -inch sieve CTM 202* 100 1-inch sieve CTM 202* 98-100 3/8-inch sieve CTM 202* 0-10
* Maximum mechanical shaking time 10 minutes
RAP Stockpile Gradation Requirements
RAP/RAS Requirements (con’t)
Quality Characteristic Test Method Requirement 1 ½ -inch sieve CTM 202* 100 ¾” inch sieve CTM 202* 98-100 3/8-inch sieve CTM 202* 98–100
*Maximum mechanical shaking time 10 minutes
RAP Stockpile Gradation Requirements
Fine RAP Percent Passing
RAP/RAS Requirements (con’t)
RAS Stockpile Gradation Requirements
Percent Passing Quality Characteristic Test Method Requirement
3/8-inch sieve CTM 202* 100 No. 4 sieve CTM 202* 90–100 *Maximum mechanical shaking time is 10 minutes
RAP/RAS Requirements (con’t)
Acceptable RAS Source(s)
• Manufactured Waste
• Post Consumer Waste
Extraneous Material limit: ≤ 2% by weight of the RAS • Glass • Brick • Soil • Tar Paper • Wood • Plastic
RAP/RAS Requirements (con’t)
Metallic Material limit ≤1% by weight of RAS Certify RAS is asbestos free
• EPA 600/R-93/16 • EPA 600/M4-892-020
RAP and RAS mechanically combined or fed into
HMA plant in accordance with CT MPQP
RAP/RAS Requirements (con’t)
RAP and RAS Sampling during HMA Production • Composite belt sample at RAP collar or batcher feed
belt
Do not lime treat RAP or RAS
Adjusting RAP or RAS feed rate allowed during HMA production to maintain gradation
RAP/RAS Requirements (con’t)
Aggregate temperature ≤ 375F when mixed with the asphalt binder
RAP Quality Requirements (During HMA Production)
Quality Characteristic Test Method Requirement
Binder content (% within the average value reported) AASHTO T 164 ±2.0
Specific gravity (within the average value reported) AASHTO T 209 ±0.06
RAP/RAS Requirements (con’t)
RAS Quality Requirements (During HMA Production)
Quality characteristic Test method Requirement Binder content (% within the average value reported) AASHTO T 164 ±2.0
Specific gravity (within the average value reported) AASHTO T 209 ±0.06
Sand equivalenta, b AASHTO T 176 47 aReport test results as the average of 3 tests from a single sample. bUse of a sand reading indicator is required as shown in AASHTO T 176, Figure 1. Sections 4.7, 4.8, 7.1.2, and 8.4.3 do not apply.
Blending Aggregate
≤50% Blend Sand allowed in RAS (flowability) Blending Aggregate Gradation (Percent Passing)
Sieve size Target Value Limit Allowable tolerance 3/8" 100 --
No. 4 80-100 TV ± 6 No. 100 0-10 TV ± 5
Caltrans Implementation Timeline
RAP/RAS NSSP October 2014 • CT Seeking Contractors request for use by COC • Binder credit offset by risk factor = net credit to CT
Spring 2015: Construction Policy Directive (CPD
• Binder credit will likely be required
Fall 2015: NSSP placed in Standard Specifications • No credit due
Questions/Discussion