Date post: | 24-May-2015 |
Category: |
Travel |
Upload: | caroline-cage |
View: | 278 times |
Download: | 0 times |
‘Building’ Social Capital and Solidarity amongst the
Urban PoorAn Exploration of the role of Organisations of the Urban Poor (OUPs) in Kisumu, Kenya
Caroline CageLondon South Bank University
Why is Social Capital important in Urban Environments
Local officials?
NGOs?
?
Resources
Information
Who should represent the Urban Poor?
The poor themselves?
Kisumu, Kenya
(Associated Press)
• Many self-help groupswomen’s, youths, mixed
• Community Based Organisations
• Microfinance organisations
Social Capital in Kisumu’s slum areas is dynamic
Source: Interviews with representatives of the Social Services Department (responsible for registering groups in Kisumu), NGO representatives and informal conversations with group members within and outside OUPs
Makika Local Network, Kisumu, Kenya
Two Organisations of the Urban Poor
Neighbourhood Planning Associations
(NPA)
Slum Dwellers Federation(SDF)
Sources: Focus group sessions with OUP higher and lower level groups. In-depth interviews with members of smaller lower level groups. Observations in the field. Interviews with government officials and NGOs working in the two areas
Neighbourhood Planning Associations
• Formed by NGOs• Outward looking• Even distribution• Officially registered and
connected to local officials
Neighbourhood Planning Associations
But…•Limits to growth, •How much are they reliant on, guided or controlled by external actors?•Long term goals are hard to sustain
Slum Dwellers Federation
• Flexible and dynamic • Better at linking existing SC• Empower marginalised
members• Short term goals build
solidarity• Long term goals and
investment in the group build cohesion
• Legitimate representatives?
Slum Dwellers Federation
But…•Not an even representation•Risk strengthening the networks of elites?•Less well connected to local stakeholders / structures•Still dependent on external support (financial management, representation, links to external partners)
Both Organisations• Exclude those who are the poorest
(membership, contributions to savings and loaning etc.)
• Have issues with poor participation at the umbrella group level
• Are dependent on external support
Discussion• Understand existing Social Capital (SC)• Aim to strengthen existing SC with inclusivity• Economic empowerment and shared
resources can strengthen SCBut…• Strengthen the SC for who?• Accessible for who?• Controlled by who?• Short-term bonding SC / long-term goals
Organisations of the Urban Poor can be significant actors in ‘building’ the social capital
of the Urban PoorBut both organisations in this study…
Are still dependent on external supportAnd both exclude some of the most vulnerable
Until structural societal inequalities are changed can Organisations of the Urban Poor be
sustainable and inclusive without support?
“the successes of participation within contemporary development policy and practice
have depended upon them being part of a broader project that is at once political and radical. By this we mean a project that seeks to directly challenge existing power relations rather than simply work around them for more technically efficient service
delivery”(Hickey and Mohan, 2005)
The pursuit of“participation as citizenship”