Canada Line Project
Stability of the Twin Bored Tunnels Under False Creek
Vancouver, British ColumbiaBy: Catherine Paul, Jen Ramesch, Matt Gellis,
Matthew Yip, and Rhaul Sharma
Vortech Engineering Ltd.Vortech Engineering Ltd. EOSC 433 EOSC 433 -- Term Project Term Project 22
Canada LineCanada LineCanada Line will connect downtown Vancouver with central Canada Line will connect downtown Vancouver with central Richmond and Vancouver International Airport (19.5km long)Richmond and Vancouver International Airport (19.5km long)
The Canada Line will consist of:The Canada Line will consist of:18 stations along its route18 stations along its routeone bridge crossing the Fraser Riverone bridge crossing the Fraser RiverElevated Elevated GuidewayGuideway section over the City of Richmondsection over the City of RichmondCut and Cover method tunnels (Marine Drive to Cambie Street)Cut and Cover method tunnels (Marine Drive to Cambie Street)Twin Bored Tunnel section (Cambie St. to Waterfront)Twin Bored Tunnel section (Cambie St. to Waterfront)
Anticipated commuter time of 25 to 30 minutes with Anticipated commuter time of 25 to 30 minutes with approximately 40 million boardings by the year 2010approximately 40 million boardings by the year 2010
Construction has commenced and is scheduled to be completed Construction has commenced and is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2009 (to avoid major delays and construction by the end of 2009 (to avoid major delays and construction during the Olympic Games)during the Olympic Games)
The need for Canada Line;The need for Canada Line;One of the busiest corridors in VancouverOne of the busiest corridors in VancouverRoad congestion has increased by 36% in the last 10 yearsRoad congestion has increased by 36% in the last 10 yearsCanada Line will provide the equivalent capacity of 10 arterial Canada Line will provide the equivalent capacity of 10 arterial roadsroads
Vortech Engineering Ltd.Vortech Engineering Ltd. EOSC 433 EOSC 433 -- Term Project Term Project 33
Canada LineCanada LineTwin Bored Tunnel SectionTwin Bored Tunnel Section
Looking North
Looking South
Vortech Engineering Ltd.Vortech Engineering Ltd. EOSC 433 EOSC 433 -- Term Project Term Project 44
Twin Bored TunnelsTwin Bored TunnelsEarth Pressure Balance Tunnel Boring MachineEarth Pressure Balance Tunnel Boring Machine
Vortech Engineering Ltd.Vortech Engineering Ltd. EOSC 433 EOSC 433 -- Term Project Term Project 55
Twin Bored TunnelsTwin Bored Tunnels
Entry Point Section A – A’
A
A’
Location
Regional Geology
Vortech Engineering Ltd.Vortech Engineering Ltd. EOSC 433 EOSC 433 -- Term Project Term Project 66
PhasePhase22 Analysis Analysis -- SectionsSectionsFill and Marine Sediments
Glacial TillSandstone Bedrock (weak)
Vortech Engineering Ltd.Vortech Engineering Ltd. EOSC 433 EOSC 433 -- Term Project Term Project 77
Material PropertiesMaterial Properties
Peak Residual Peak Residual0.005 0.01 0 0
0.1 0.01 35 300.5 0.01 35 30
Elastic PropertiesMaterial Type
0.0113
Mohr-Coloumb 0 0.01
Strength ParametersCohesion (MPa) Dialation Angle
(deg)Friction Angle (deg)Failure Criterion
Lithologic Unit Unit Weight (kN/m3)
2225
Fill & Marine Sediments
SandstoneGlacial Till Plastic 100 0.3
Young's Modulus Poisson's RatioPlastic 0.01
Plastic 10000 0.2
Mohr-Coloumb 0 0.01Mohr-Coloumb 0 0.01
Tensiles Strength (MPa)
Vortech Engineering Ltd.Vortech Engineering Ltd. EOSC 433 EOSC 433 -- Term Project Term Project 88
TBM AdvancementTBM AdvancementSettlement Progression ProfileSettlement Progression Profile
100%
50%
10%
3D 0%
D
D
D
28%
TBM STANDARD
MODELLED
EPBM (IDEAL)
SOIL DILATIONPRIOR TO CONCRETEINSTALLATION
6D3D
Vortech Engineering Ltd.Vortech Engineering Ltd. EOSC 433 EOSC 433 -- Term Project Term Project 99
PhasePhase22 AnalysisAnalysisModel Section 3Model Section 3
Vortech Engineering Ltd.Vortech Engineering Ltd. EOSC 433 EOSC 433 -- Term Project Term Project 1010
PhasePhase22 AnalysisAnalysisModel Section 3Model Section 3
Vortech Engineering Ltd.Vortech Engineering Ltd. EOSC 433 EOSC 433 -- Term Project Term Project 1111
Sensitivity AnalysisSensitivity Analysis
0.0002
0.00021
0.00022
0.00023
0.00024
0.00025
0.00026
0.00027
0.00028
0.00029
-30% -15% 0% +15% +30%
Variance of Parameters
Tota
l Disp
lace
men
t (m
)
Unit Weight of Sandstone Unit Weight of Marine Sediments (and Fill)
Unit Weight of Till Young's Modulus of Sandstone
Young's Modulus of Marine Sediments (and Fill) Young's Modulus of Till
Lateral Earth Pressure, K
Vortech Engineering Ltd.Vortech Engineering Ltd. EOSC 433 EOSC 433 -- Term Project Term Project 1212
ConclusionsConclusions
Recommend additional drilling to further investigate presence ofRecommend additional drilling to further investigate presence of faults and faults and discontinuities, including orientation relative to tunnel axis discontinuities, including orientation relative to tunnel axis (unable to (unable to determine strike and dip from current borehole data)determine strike and dip from current borehole data)
10.5210.52440.3310.331330.2980.298224.4794.47911
Total Displacement (mm)Total Displacement (mm)Model SectionModel Section
Based on this preliminary assessment, tunnel stability should noBased on this preliminary assessment, tunnel stability should not be a major t be a major issue assuming proper support guidelines are followed.issue assuming proper support guidelines are followed.
The possible presence of one or more shear or fault zones crossiThe possible presence of one or more shear or fault zones crossing the ng the tunnel alignment may be a cause for concern.tunnel alignment may be a cause for concern.
Minimum Pillar Width Minimum Pillar Width Between Twin Bored Tunnels Between Twin Bored Tunnels
along Granville St.along Granville St.
International Solutions Ltd.Veronica Lau, Murthy Pathi, Roald Strand, Daniela Welkner & Marcia Wilson
Introduction
•• Downtown Granville Downtown Granville St.St.
•• From Nelson to W. From Nelson to W. CordovaCordova
•• Twin sideTwin side--byby--side side tunnel section using tunnel section using TBMTBM
Information Provided•• Tunnel DiameterTunnel Diameter•• Depth to Top of TunnelDepth to Top of Tunnel•• Types of Soil/Rock to be encounteredTypes of Soil/Rock to be encountered
Assumptions Required•• Rock/soil parametersRock/soil parameters•• Building loads and positionBuilding loads and position•• Water table elevationWater table elevation
•• StratigraphyStratigraphy•• Constant tunnel depthConstant tunnel depth•• Tunnel supportTunnel support
Analysis
•• Numerical modelling using Phase2Numerical modelling using Phase2•• Several different scenarios Several different scenarios
•• Varying rock and soil interfaces Varying rock and soil interfaces •• Excavation sequencingExcavation sequencing•• Building excavation optionBuilding excavation option
•• Strength factorStrength factor
Water table 20m deep
Scenario 1 – Twin Bored Tunnels
Water table at surface
Scenario 2 – Influence of Existing Buildings
Stage 1
Stage 2 Stage 3
Pre-Tunnel Conditions
Scenario 3 – Impact of Future Building
Stage 1 Stage 2
Stage 3 Stage 4
Till
Sandstone
Scenario 4 – Future Building & Thicker Soil Cover
Stage 1 Stage 2
Stage 3 Stage 4
Till
Sandstone
Summary & Conclusions•• Potential failures (assuming a twinPotential failures (assuming a twin--tunnel tunnel
spacing of 11.4m) when tunnels driven in poor spacing of 11.4m) when tunnels driven in poor till or sand, successes when driven in poor to till or sand, successes when driven in poor to good sandstones good sandstones –– geology plays a significant geology plays a significant role in determining pillar widthrole in determining pillar width
•• Found that sequence of construction is relevant, Found that sequence of construction is relevant, especially with respect to future developments in especially with respect to future developments in VancouverVancouver’’s downtown core (i.e. interactions s downtown core (i.e. interactions between new building foundations and existing between new building foundations and existing Canada Line tunnels) Canada Line tunnels)
11.4m
2 tunnel diameters
only with proper soil improvement or tunnel support
Tunnel SpacingTunnel Spacing