Date post: | 03-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | hernebaymatters |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 131
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
1/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of st udyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
754559-72151207211232274572Very satisfied33%52%z28%50%z-46%z25%40%61%zh47%47%29%50%d42%45%44%d
14431351-84370117232430354984Fairly satisfied67%41%72%43%-54%z75%55%g33%47%51%59%47%54%49%51%gln
-2-2---21--21-33Neither satisfied nor-2%-2%---2%3%--5%2%-3%2%dissatisfied
-5-66--511131336Fairly dissatisfied
-5%
-5%100%
--4%3%7%2%7%2%5%3%
4%j----------------Very dissatisfied----------------
----------------No opinion/ Don't know----------------
219718110-156412131144436626294156SATISFIED100%93%100%93%-100%z100%95%94%93%98%88%97%95%94%95%
-5-66--511131336DISSATISFIED-5%-5%100%--4%3%7%2%7%2%5%3%4%j
219218104-6156411630134333615991150NET SATISFIED100%88%100%88%-100%100%z100%91%91%87%96%d80%95%d91%91%91%d
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 1
Q.4. How satisfied or di ssatisfied are you wi th your local area as a place to live?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
2/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
815381014351381332222619163672Very satisfied38%65%45%31%67%40%41%47%38%48%42%35%48%32%58%zB44%BD
12742206451982132254319302484Fairly satisfied57%30%49%63%29%52%59%47%62%48%47%58%48%60%A39%51%A
-1-2-2-1-1211113Neither satisfied nor-4%-6%M-2%-6%-2%4%1%3%2%2%2%dissatisfied
1-5-15---1441316Fairly dissatisfied5%-6%-5%6%---2%8%5%3%6%2%4%
----------------Very dissatisfied
--------------------------------No opinion/ Don't know----------------
202280302080321634644769384660156SATISFIED95%96%94%94%95%92%100%94%100%E97%89%93%95%92%97%95%E
1-5-15---1441316DISSATISFIED5%-6%-5%6%---2%8%5%3%6%2%4%
192275301975321634634365374359150NET SATISFIED90%96%88%94%90%86%100%J94%100%E95%E81%88%93%86%95%91%EJ
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 2
Q.4. How satisfied or di ssatisfied are you wi th your local area as a place to live?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
3/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of s tudyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
91771913012476641672532Arts and cultural43%16%39%16%17%19%25%19%21%40%13%10%25%11%25%zb19%bactivities
437444248-4294131519193251Amount and quality of19%36%22%37%z33%31%-33%27%27%29%37%30%29%32%31%housing
73463324714096141515242650Better town centres33%33%33%28%33%30%25%31%27%40%31%37%23%37%26%30%
1817-8-631-35279Care for the elderly5%8%6%6%
-5%
-5%9%7%
-7%8%3%7%5%
838745457147145131727243862Education services and38%37%39%38%67%37%25%37%42%33%29%41%42%37%38%38%opportunities to learn
217-19-2421754758101424Facilities for children10%16%-16%-15%50%13%15%27%16%12%13%15%14%15%and young people
829735247140105111421193251Health services38%28%39%30%33%30%25%31%30%33%24%34%33%29%32%31%
83884435624983231320273259J ob opportunities/high38%37%44%37%50%36%50%38%24%20%51%zc32%31%42%32%36%levels of employment
633336144-3511213922163046Leisure facilities29%32%17%31%17%28%-27%33%13%29%22%34%25%30%28%
216-20-24-195276991524Play areas, parks and10%15%-17%-15%-15%15%13%16%15%14%14%15%15%open spaces
11651271493273248262441415899Public safety/low crime52%63%67%60%67%60%50%57%73%53%58%59%64%63%58%60%levels
847856471164125252324304777Public transport and38%45%44%47%67%46%25%50%36%33%56%56%38%46%47%47%roads
8257241402327591116152641The countryside and the38%24%39%20%17%26%50%25%21%33%20%27%25%23%26%25%lnatural environment
----------------Other (specify)----------------
----------------Don't know----------------
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 3
Q.5. Thinking generally, which of the items on this l ist would you say are most impor tant in making somewhere a good place to live?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
4/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
3414112158681112149121032Arts and cultural14%17%16%34%zM10%17%25%35%24%17%23%19%23%24%16%19%activities
109266531103723172014172151Amount and quality of48%39%31%19%24%36%31%18%21%35%32%27%35%34%34%31%housing
2102414727851121162312142250Better town centres10%43%28%44%33%31%25%29%32%32%30%31%30%28%35%30%
3222313252262339Care for the elderly14%9%2%6%14%1%9%J12%15%zF3%4%8%5%6%5%5%JM
79341210341071722202910132362Education services and33%39%40%38%48%39%31%41%50%33%38%39%25%26%37%
38%Bopportunities to learn631052147-481113210524Facilities for children
29%13%12%16%10%16%22%-12%12%21%18%5%20%8%15%Cand young people
6725118251061520122015112251Health services29%30%29%34%38%29%31%35%44%E30%23%27%38%22%35%31%
28388832104924212519202559J ob opportunities/high10%35%45%z25%38%37%31%24%26%36%40%34%48%40%40%36%levels of employment
65268112276719171816122246Leisure facilities29%22%31%25%52%25%22%35%21%29%32%24%40%24%35%28%
83103410824981555824Play areas, parks and38%13%12%9%19%11%25%12%12%14%15%20%13%10%13%15%open spaces
14135217105420101943304524283899Public safety/low crime67%57%61%53%48%62%63%59%56%65%57%61%60%56%61%60%levels
101340116471261632223218282577Public transport and 48%57%47%34%29%54%z38%35%47%48%42%43%45%56%40%47%roads
32181641610791714246181141The countryside and the14%9%21%50%zM19%18%31%41%26%26%26%32%C15%36%zA18%25%Jnatural environment
----------------Other (specify)----------------
----------------Don't know----------------
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 4
Q.5. Thinking generally, which of the items on this l ist would you say are most impor tant in making somewhere a good place to live?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
5/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of studyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
712514-2311844441181523Arts and cultural33%12%28%12%-15%25%14%12%27%9%10%17%12%15%14%activities
728629430-325391015102737Amount and quality of33%27%33%25%67%19%-25%15%20%20%24%23%15%27%22%jhousing
61951942412445510992029Better town centres29%18%28%16%67%15%25%19%12%33%11%24%14%14%20%18%j
1111-4-22-31-224Care for the elderly5%1%6%1%
-3%
-2%6%
-7%c2%
-3%2%2%l
454629110-26212911Education services and19%5%22%5%33%6%25%8%-13%13%c5%2%3%9%7%cjopportunities to learn
593121181126273791019Facilities for children24%9%17%10%17%12%25%9%18%13%16%7%11%14%10%12%and young people
313313117-144333941418Health services14%13%17%11%17%11%-11%12%20%7%7%14%6%14%11%
62753234113584121117172744J ob opportunities/high29%26%28%27%50%26%25%27%24%27%27%27%27%26%27%27%levels of employment
324226232-332113417102535Leisure facilities14%23%11%22%33%21%-26%zg6%7%29%d10%27%d15%25%21%dg
417417123-186295871724Play areas, parks and19%16%22%14%17%15%-14%18%13%20%12%13%11%17%15%open spaces
4104111172142455411718Public safety/low crime19%10%22%9%17%11%50%11%6%27%11%12%6%17%a7%11%alevels
5238261382317313177221840Public transport and24%22%44%22%17%24%50%24%21%20%29%c41%zc11%34%za18%24%acroads
56581141105171751116The countryside and the24%6%28%7%17%9%25%8%15%7%16%d2%11%8%11%10%lnnatural environment
----------------Other (specify)----------------
-3-4-8-621115358Don't know-3%-3%-5%-5%6%7%2%2%8%5%5%5%
24-8-8-621115178No answer10%4%-7%-5%-5%6%7%2%2%8%2%7%5%
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 5
Q.6. Which of the items on this list would you most like to see improved, to make this area a better place to live?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
6/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
24710186612631046923Arts and cultural10%17%8%31%zM5%9%19%35%35%zEF9%6%14%10%12%15%14%EMactivities
5516106213581216167131537Amount and quality of24%22%19%31%29%24%9%29%24%18%30%22%18%26%24%22%Ihousing
25148317435912145131029Better town centres10%22%16%25%14%20%13%18%15%14%23%19%13%26%16%18%
-121-2-1112213-4Care for the elderly-4%2%3%-2%-6%3%2%4%3%3%6%-2%
1-6423232268-5411Education services and5%
-7%13%10%3%6%18%6%3%11%11%C
-10%6%7%
opportunities to learn14104-12426661167419Facilities for children5%17%12%13%-14%13%12%18%9%11%15%15%14%6%12%and young people
2384311-4458698518Health services10%13%9%13%14%13%I-24%12%8%15%8%23%zD16%8%11%
453143278662015258151344J ob opportunities/high19%22%36%zL13%14%31%25%35%18%30%28%34%20%30%21%27%Llevels of employment
751858185431615141291535Leisure facilities33%22%21%16%38%21%16%24%9%24%28%G19%30%18%24%21%G
641134874798775924Play areas, parks and29%17%13%9%19%9%22%24%21%14%15%9%18%10%15%15%Jopen spaces
2295-12333941047518Public safety/low crime10%9%11%16%-14%9%18%9%14%8%14%10%14%8%11%levels
562265226491613247141440Public transport and24%26%26%19%24%25%19%24%26%24%25%32%z18%28%23%24%roads
21761922654323816The countryside and the10%4%8%19%5%10%6%12%18%8%8%4%5%6%13%10%Dnatural environment
----------------Other (specify)----------------
2-33-53--613-238Don't know10%-4%9%-6%9%--9%2%4%-4%5%5%
-232312142-14148No answer-9%4%6%14%1%6%6%12%E3%-1%10%D2%6%5%DJ
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 6
Q.6. Which of the items on this list would you most like to see improved, to make this area a better place to live?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
7/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of s tudyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
415418125-23427810111627Encouraging greater19%14%22%15%17%16%-18%12%13%16%20%16%17%16%16%involvement for local
people
955861178261195212333325082Keeping the district a43%53%44%52%17%50%50%48%58%33%47%56%52%49%50%50%safe place to live
421224-33124925819132134Making the district19%20%11%20%-21%25%19%27%13%11%20%30%ze20%21%21%cleaner and greener
231431335-3533101015112738Planning for the right10%30%z22%26%50%22%-27%zg9%20%22%24%23%17%27%23%gtype and number of homes
in the right places
4949-171133336571017Supporting excellent and19%9%22%8%-11%25%10%9%20%7%15%8%11%10%10%diverse cultural
facilities andactivities for residentsand visitors
71771822912645781192231Tackling disadvantage33%16%39%15%33%19%25%20%12%33%16%20%17%14%22%19%
214118122-176-8411121123Supporting a broad range10%13%6%15%17%14%-13%18%-18%10%17%18%11%14%of sporting and fitness
facilities andactivities
416221126218721168131427Supporting facilities19%15%11%18%17%17%50%14%21%13%24%15%13%20%14%16%and activities for
children and youngpeople
74955626926297161832244973Supporting the growth of33%47%28%47%33%44%50%48%zg27%47%36%44%50%37%49%44%gthe local economy and
the number of people inwork
103093625114597211116213455Tackling traffic48%29%50%31%33%33%25%35%27%47%47%zc27%25%32%34%33%congestion and improving
the condition of roadsand pavements
-1-1-2--2---2112Other (specify)-1%-1%-1%--6%zh---3%2%1%1%
----------------Don't know----------------
----------------No answer----------------
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 7
Q.7. On this card is a list of things t hat Canterbury City Counci l has identified as prio rities.Which two or three, if any, do you think it is most important for the Council to work towards?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
8/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
3-18631355591211810827Encouraging greater14%-21%19%14%15%16%29%15%14%23%15%20%20%13%16%involvement for local
people
1110431410451381935223723243282Keeping the district a52%43%51%44%48%52%41%47%56%53%42%50%58%48%52%50%safe place to live
391482206561214157111234Making the district14%39%16%25%10%23%19%29%18%18%26%20%18%22%19%21%cleaner and greener
741967205361316199161938Planning for the right33%17%22%19%33%23%16%18%18%20%30%26%23%32%31%23%type and number of homes
in the right places
-28729425571018417Supporting excellent and-9%9%22%z10%10%13%12%15%8%13%14%3%16%6%10%Cdiverse cultural
facilities andactivities for residentsand visitors
4414921493711121379631Tackling disadvantage19%17%16%28%10%16%28%18%21%17%23%18%18%18%10%19%A
5510251053210951271323Supporting a broad range24%22%12%6%24%11%16%18%6%15%17%7%30%zD14%21%14%Dof sporting and fitness
facilities andactivities
43118410656811144111027Supporting facilities19%13%13%25%19%11%19%29%18%12%21%19%10%22%16%16%and activities for
children and youngpeople
71139146391681737153716182573Supporting the growth of33%48%46%44%29%45%50%47%50%E56%zE28%50%40%36%40%44%Ethe local economy and
the number of people inwork
71127104361221422142610142255Tackling traffic33%48%32%31%19%41%z38%12%41%33%26%35%25%28%35%33%congestion and improving
the condition of roadsand pavements
--1--1-1-1111-12Other (specify)--1%--1%-6%-2%2%1%3%-2%1%
----------------Don't know----------------
----------------No answer----------------
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 8
Q.7. On this card is a list of things t hat Canterbury City Counci l has identified as prio rities.Which two or three, if any, do you think it is most important for the Council to work towards?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
9/131
Support for building inSatisfaction with
districtSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of studyStudent residenceUni ofOther/ med
Dis-Canterburystudent/ post-OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal
(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
-36-38235130727821142438Strongly support-35%z-32%z33%22%25%23%21%13%16%20%33%ze22%24%23%
463-80475263158242226334780Tend to support19%61%z-68%z67%48%50%49%45%53%53%54%41%51%47%48%
24---281181049412141529Neither support nor10%4%---18%25%14%30%zh27%20%10%19%22%15%18%hlnoppose
13-15--15-141146441115Tend to oppose62%-83%--10%-11%3%7%9%15%6%6%11%9%ln
213--3-3--111-33Strongly oppose10%1%17%--2%-2%--2%2%2%-3%2%
----------------Don't know----------------
499-118611039322103130474771118SUPPORT19%95%z-100%z100%71%75%73%67%67%69%73%73%72%71%72%
15118--18-171157541418OPPOSE71%1%100%--12%-13%3%7%11%17%8%6%14%11%ln
-1198-181186923762192623424357100NET SUPPORT-52%94%z-100%100%z100%59%75%59%64%60%58%56%66%66%57%61%
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 9
Q.8a. In princ iple, do you support or oppose the buildi ng of new homes in the future in your local area?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
10/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
6524310222458221410131738Strongly support29%22%28%L9%48%25%I6%24%15%12%42%zFG19%25%26%27%23%FIL
111440139441941541184117232880Tend to support52%61%47%41%43%51%59%24%44%62%zE34%55%43%46%45%48%E
4314721673513913710829Neither support nor19%13%16%22%10%18%22%18%15%20%17%18%18%20%13%18%oppose
-176-444923642815Tend to oppose-4%8%19%-5%13%24%26%zEF3%6%8%10%4%13%9%FJ
---3-1-2-21-2213Strongly oppose---9%zM-1%-12%-3%2%-5%4%2%2%
----------------Don't know----------------
17196416196621820494055273645118SUPPORT81%83%75%L50%90%76%66%47%59%74%75%74%68%72%73%72%L
-179-546944664918OPPOSE-4%8%28%zM-6%13%35%26%zEF6%8%8%15%8%15%11%J
1718577196117211453649213236100NET SUPPORT81%78%67%L22%90%70%z53%12%32%68%G68%G66%53%64%58%61%GL
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 10
Q.8a. In princ iple, do you support or oppose the buildi ng of new homes in the future in your local area?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
11/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of studyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
-35-35331127746718122335Strongly support-34%z-30%z50%20%25%21%21%27%13%17%28%18%23%21%
-69164266253146201924284169Tend to support-66%z6%54%z33%42%50%41%42%40%44%46%38%43%41%42%
--21213512511311914221537Neither support nor--11%10%17%22%25%20%33%20%24%22%22%34%za15%22%alnoppose
17-123-17-161264521517Tend to oppose 81%-67%3%-11%-13%3%13%13%10%8%3%15%zb10%bln
4-31-4-4--112-44Strongly oppose19%-17%1%-3%-3%--2%2%3%-4%2%l
---3-3-3--111123Don't know---3%-2%-2%--2%2%2%2%2%2%
-10419959738021102626424064104SUPPORT-100%z6%84%z83%62%75%63%64%67%58%63%66%62%64%63%
21-154-21-201275721921OPPOSE100%-83%3%-13%-16%z3%13%16%12%11%3%19%zb13%bgln
-21104-1495576360208192135384583NET SUPPORT-100%100%z-78%81%z83%49%75%47%61%53%42%51%55%58%45%50%
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 11
Q.8b. In principle, do you support or oppose the buil ding of new homes in the future in t he district o f Canterbury, by that I mean Canterbury as well as Herne Bay, Whitstable andthe surrounding area as shown on this map?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
12/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
552238221441017119141435Strongly support24%22%26%9%38%25%I3%24%12%15%32%zFG15%23%28%23%21%I
1110341211361541135213618222469Tend to support52%43%40%38%52%41%47%24%32%53%z40%49%45%44%39%42%
542061239261612177101237Neither support nor24%17%24%19%5%26%28%12%18%24%23%23%18%20%19%22%oppose
-17914541222932917Tend to oppose-4%8%28%zM5%5%16%J24%35%zEF3%4%12%8%4%15%10%EFJ
-112--13-31-3124Strongly oppose -4%1%6%--3%18%-5%2%-8%zD2%3%2%
-21--21-1--1-113Don't know-9%1%--2%3%-3%--1%-2%2%2%
16155615195816815453847273638104SUPPORT76%65%66%47%90%67%50%47%44%68%G72%G64%68%72%61%63%GL
-2811146712539631121OPPOSE-9%9%34%zM5%5%19%J41%35%zEF8%6%12%15%6%18%13%EJ
16134841854101340353821332783NET SUPPORT76%57%56%L13%86%62%zI31%6%9%61%zG66%zG51%53%66%zA44%50%GIL
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 12
Q.8b. In principle, do you support or oppose the buil ding of new homes in the future in t he district o f Canterbury, by that I mean Canterbury as well as Herne Bay, Whitstable andthe surrounding area as shown on this map?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
13/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of s tudyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
-34-39238228115131013221941Strongly support-33%z-33%z33%24%50%22%33%33%29%24%20%34%za19%25%a
964672492179189242738356398Tend to support43%62%33%61%67%59%25%62%55%60%53%66%59%54%63%59%
8485-19-163174761319Neither support nor38%4%44%4%-12%-13%9%7%16%10%11%9%13%12%lnoppose
2222-5131---5235Tend to oppose 10%2%11%2%-3%25%2%3%---8%z3%3%3%
2-2--2-2--1-1-22Strongly oppose10%-11%--1%-2%--2%-2%-2%1%
----------------Don't know----------------
99861116130310729143737515782139SUPPORT43%94%z33%94%z100%83%75%84%88%93%82%90%80%88%82%84%
4242-7151-1-6257OPPOSE19%2%22%2%-4%25%4%3%-2%-9%zd3%5%4%ln
59621096123210228143637455577132NET SUPPORT24%92%z11%92%z100%79%50%80%85%93%80%90%c70%85%77%80%c
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 13
Q.9.1. In princip le, do you suppor t or oppose the building of new homes in the futu re in the distri ct of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant that enough affordable homes were provided for local residents
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
14/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
952428235321819199141641Strongly support43%22%28%L6%38%26%16%18%6%27%G36%zG26%23%28%26%25%GL
1114492213542262142294822283698Tend to support52%61%58%69%62%62%69%35%62%64%55%65%55%56%58%59%
1396-7551042657619Neither support nor5%13%11%19%-8%16%29%29%zEF6%4%8%13%14%10%12%Eoppose
-112-3-2-22-3135Tend to oppose-4%1%6%-3%-12%-3%4%-8%D2%5%3%
--2----11-111-12Strongly oppose --2%----6%3%-2%1%3%-2%1%
----------------Don't know----------------
20197324217727923604867314252139SUPPORT95%83%86%75%100%89%84%53%68%91%zG91%G91%z78%84%84%84%G
-132-3-312314147OPPOSE-4%4%6%-3%-18%3%3%6%1%10%D2%6%4%
20187022217427622584566274148132NET SUPPORT95%78%82%69%100%85%84%35%65%88%zG85%G89%zC68%82%77%80%CG
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 14
Q.9.1. In princip le, do you suppor t or oppose the building of new homes in the futu re in the distri ct of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant that enough affordable homes were provided for local residents
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
15/131
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
16/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
217-361-235-42710Strongly support10%4%8%-14%7%3%-6%5%9%-10%D4%11%z6%D
1310461412461951436314521312686Tend to support62%43%54%44%57%53%59%29%41%55%58%61%z53%62%A42%52%A
661985227471412175121639Neither support nor29%26%22%25%24%25%22%24%21%21%23%23%13%24%26%24%oppose
-5991114691238841024Tend to oppose-22%11%28%zM5%13%13%35%26%zE18%E6%11%20%8%16%15%E
-141-21221242136Strongly oppose-4%5%3%-2%3%12%6%2%4%5%5%2%5%4%
----------------Don't know----------------
1511531415522051639364525333396SUPPORT71%48%62%44%71%60%63%29%47%59%68%61%63%66%53%58%
-613101135811135121051330OPPOSE-26%15%31%z5%15%16%47%32%zE20%9%16%25%10%21%18%E
155404143915-3526313315282066NET SUPPORT71%22%47%L13%67%45%47%-18%15%39%G58%zFG45%38%56%zA32%40%GL
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 16
Q.9.2. In princip le, do you suppor t or oppose the building of new homes in the futu re in the distri ct of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It increases the demands on public services
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
17/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of studyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
-3413933922516681019222143Strongly support-33%z6%33%z50%25%50%20%48%zh40%18%24%30%34%21%26%h
769674394182168272737366399Tend to support33%66%z33%63%50%60%25%64%z48%53%60%66%58%55%63%60%
11184-191171183761319Neither support nor52%1%44%3%-12%25%13%3%7%18%7%11%9%13%12%lnoppose
1-11-2-2--11-112Tend to oppose5%-6%1%-1%-2%--2%2%-2%1%1%
2-2--2-2--1-1-22Strongly oppose10%-11%--1%-2%--2%-2%-2%1%
----------------Don't know----------------
710371136133310732143537565884142SUPPORT33%99%z39%96%z100%85%75%84%97%zh93%78%90%88%89%84%86%
3-31-4-4--211134OPPOSE14%-17%1%-3%-3%--4%2%2%2%3%2%l
410341126129310332143336555781138NET SUPPORT19%99%z22%95%z100%83%75%80%97%zh93%73%88%86%88%81%84%eh
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 17
Q.9.3. In princip le, do you suppor t or oppose the building of new homes in the futu re in the distri ct of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant that young people and families could stay in the district
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
18/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
105261102651420171610131743Strongly support48%22%31%L3%48%30%16%6%12%30%G32%G22%25%26%27%26%GL
1015492210552281840345025323499Tend to support48%65%58%69%48%63%69%47%53%61%64%68%63%64%55%60%
137815571061645819Neither support nor5%13%8%25%zM5%6%16%41%29%zEF9%2%8%10%10%13%12%EJoppose
--11-1--1--1--22Tend to oppose--1%3%-1%--3%--1%--3%1%
--2----11-111-12Strongly oppose--2%----6%3%-2%1%3%-2%1%
----------------Don't know----------------
20207523208127922605166354551142SUPPORT95%87%88%L72%95%93%z84%53%65%91%G96%zG89%88%90%82%86%GL
--31-1-12-121-34OPPOSE--4%3%-1%-6%6%-2%3%3%-5%2%
20207222208027820605064344548138NET SUPPORT95%87%85%69%95%92%z84%47%59%91%zG94%zG86%85%90%77%84%GL
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 18
Q.9.3. In princip le, do you suppor t or oppose the building of new homes in the futu re in the distri ct of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant that young people and families could stay in the district
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
19/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of studyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
-2-413-31-1-3134Strongly support-2%-3%17%2%-2%3%-2%-5%2%3%2%
127128-33124839912132033Tend to support5%26%z6%24%-21%25%19%24%20%20%22%19%20%20%20%
-26-27329125757813102333Neither support nor-25%z-23%50%19%25%20%21%33%16%20%20%15%23%20%oppose
637645260249124171923342963Tend to oppose29%36%33%38%33%38%50%38%36%27%38%46%36%52%za29%38%a
14111113-30-26531151262531Strongly oppose67%11%61%11%-19%-20%15%20%24%12%19%9%25%zb19%bln
-1-1-1-1----11-1Don't know-1%-1%-1%-1%----2%2%-1%
1291321361279310915142337SUPPORT5%28%z6%27%z17%23%25%21%27%20%22%22%23%22%23%22%
20481758290275177282435405494OPPOSE95%46%94%49%33%58%50%59%52%47%62%59%55%62%54%57%ln
-19-19-16-26-1-54-1-48-8-4-18-15-20-26-31-57NET SUPPORT-90%-18%-89%-22%-17%-35%-25%-38%-24%-27%-40%-37%-31%-40%-31%-35%
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 19
Q.9.4. In princip le, do you suppor t or oppose the building of new homes in the futu re in the distri ct of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant building on greenfield i.e. land that is undeveloped
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
20/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
1-3-121--1312114Strongly support5%-4%-5%2%3%--2%6%1%5%2%2%2%
8618-9185171213167131333Tend to support38%26%21%L-43%21%16%6%21%18%25%22%18%26%21%20%L
55221523323141210810733Neither support nor24%22%26%L3%24%26%zI9%12%9%21%23%14%20%20%11%20%ALoppose
6733162351861130163016182563Tend to oppose29%30%39%50%10%40%56%z35%32%45%30%41%40%36%40%38%
159154958139917681531Strongly oppose5%22%11%47%zM19%10%16%47%38%zEF14%17%23%15%16%24%19%JM
------------1-11Don't know------------3%-2%1%
9621-10206171316179141437SUPPORT43%26%25%L-48%23%19%6%21%20%30%23%23%28%23%22%L
712423164423142439254722264094OPPOSE33%52%49%97%zM29%51%72%J82%71%E59%47%64%55%52%65%57%M
2-6-21-314-24-17-13-17-26-9-30-13-12-26-57NET SUPPORT10%-26%-25%-97%19%-28%-53%-76%-50%-39%-17%-41%-33%-24%-42%-35%
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 20
Q.9.4. In princip le, do you suppor t or oppose the building of new homes in the futu re in the distri ct of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant building on greenfield i.e. land that is undeveloped
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
21/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of s tudyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
-37142342-3214481123202646Strongly support-36%z6%36%z50%27%-25%42%z27%18%27%36%e31%26%28%
13561063288374158302529345892Tend to support62%54%56%53%33%56%75%58%45%53%67%c61%45%52%58%56%c
493111181144353881119Neither support nor19%9%17%9%17%12%25%11%12%20%11%7%13%12%11%12%oppose
3232-7-7--223347Tend to oppose
14%2%17%2%-4%-5%--4%5%5%5%4%4%ln
1-1--1-1----1-11Strongly oppose5%-6%--1%-1%----2%-1%1%
----------------Don't know----------------
1393111055130310629123836525484138SUPPORT62%89%z61%89%z83%83%75%83%88%80%84%88%81%83%84%84%
4242-8-8--224358OPPOSE19%2%22%2%-5%-6%--4%5%6%5%5%5%ln
9917103512239829123634485179130NET SUPPORT43%88%z39%87%z83%78%75%77%88%80%80%83%75%78%79%79%
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 21
Q.9.5. In princip le, do you suppor t or oppose the building of new homes in the futu re in the distri ct of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It helped to create jobs by attracting people and businesses to the area
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
22/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homes PopulationHousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal
(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
96281102574421202213141746Strongly support43%26%33%L3%48%29%22%24%12%32%G38%G30%33%28%27%28%GL
111146229521762236304322283492Tend to support52%48%54%69%43%60%53%35%65%55%57%58%55%56%55%56%
15762773662636819Neither support nor5%22%8%19%10%8%22%J18%18%E9%4%8%8%12%13%12%Eoppose
-133-31323-31237Tend to oppose-4%4%9%-3%3%18%6%5%-4%3%4%5%4%
--1----1--1-1--1Strongly oppose
--1%----6%--2%-3%--1%
----------------Don't know----------------
201774231977241026575065354251138SUPPORT95%74%87%72%90%89%75%59%76%86%94%zG88%88%84%82%84%
-143-31423132238OPPOSE-4%5%9%-3%3%24%6%5%2%4%5%4%5%5%
20167020197423624544962334048130NET SUPPORT95%70%82%L63%90%85%z72%35%71%82%92%zG84%83%80%77%79%L
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 22
Q.9.5. In princip le, do you suppor t or oppose the building of new homes in the futu re in the distri ct of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It helped to create jobs by attracting people and businesses to the area
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
23/131
Support for building inSatisfaction with districtSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of studyStudent residenceUni ofOther/ med
Dis-Canterburystudent/ post-OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal
(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
-4-5-5-4111-3-55Strongly support-4%-4%-3%-3%3%7%2%-5%-5%3%
-32133233126868813191635Tend to support-31%z6%28%z33%21%25%20%24%40%18%20%20%29%a16%21%a
121122129-21918813151530Neither support nor5%20%6%19%17%19%-16%27%7%18%20%20%23%15%18%oppose
839846362255104191925234467Tend to oppose
38%38%44%39%50%40%50%43%30%27%42%46%39%35%44%41%
128812-2712253961082028Strongly oppose57%8%44%10%-17%25%17%15%20%20%15%16%12%20%17%ln
----------------Don't know----------------
-36138238130979816192140SUPPORT-35%z6%32%z33%24%25%23%27%47%20%20%25%29%21%24%
20471658389377157282535316495OPPOSE95%45%89%49%50%57%75%60%45%47%62%61%55%48%64%zb58%bln
-20-11-15-20-1-51-2-47-60-19-17-19-12-43-55NET SUPPORT-95%-11%-83%-17%-17%-33%-50%-37%-18%0%-42%-41%-30%-18%-43%-33%
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 23
Q.9.6. In princip le, do you suppor t or oppose the building of new homes in the futu re in the distri ct of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant an increase in traffic and congestion
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
24/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homes PopulationHousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal
(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
2-3-131-12212235Strongly support10%-4%-5%3%3%-3%3%4%1%5%4%5%3%
541946196221119167181135Tend to support24%17%22%13%29%22%19%12%6%17%36%zFG22%18%36%zA18%21%G
351832216141951086930Neither support nor14%22%21%9%10%24%z19%6%12%29%zE9%14%20%12%15%18%Eoppose
8933178371461626203414182767Tend to oppose38%39%39%53%38%43%44%35%47%39%38%46%35%36%44%41%
351284758118713961228Strongly oppose
14%22%14%25%19%8%16%47%32%zEF12%13%18%23%12%19%17%J
----------------Don't know----------------
742247227231321179201440SUPPORT33%17%26%13%33%25%22%12%9%20%40%zFG23%23%40%zA23%24%G
11144525124419142734274723243995OPPOSE52%61%53%78%zM57%51%59%82%79%zEF52%51%64%58%48%63%58%
-4-10-23-21-5-22-12-12-24-21-6-30-14-4-25-55NET SUPPORT-19%-43%-27%-66%-24%-25%-38%-71%-71%-32%-11%-41%-35%-8%-40%-33%
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 24
Q.9.6. In princip le, do you suppor t or oppose the building of new homes in the futu re in the distri ct of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant an increase in traffic and congestion
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
C b F D l
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
25/131
5. It helped to3. It meant1. It meantcreate jobs by4. It meantthat youngthat enough
6. It meant anattractingbuilding onpeople andaffordableincrease inpeople andgreenfieldfamilies could2. It increaseshomes weretraffic andbusinesses toi.e. land thatstay in thethe demands onprovided forcongestionthe areais undevelopeddistrictpublic serviceslocal residents
165165165165165165Total
5464431041Strongly support3%28%2%26%6%25%
359233998698Tend to support21%56%20%60%52%59%
301933193919Neither support nor18%12%20%12%24%12%oppose
677632245Tend to oppose41%4%38%1%15%3%
28131262Strongly oppose
17%1%19%1%4%1%
--1---Don't know--1%---
401383714296139SUPPORT24%84%22%86%58%84%
958944307OPPOSE58%5%57%2%18%4%
-55130-5713866132NET SUPPORT-33%79%-35%84%40%80%
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 25
Q.9. Summary Table. In princ iple, do you support or oppose the buildi ng of new homes in the future in the dist rict of Canterbury as a whole if ...?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %
INTERNAL USE ONLY
C t b F t D l t
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
26/131
Support for building inSatisfaction with districtSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of studyStudent residenceUni ofOther/ med
Dis-Canterburystudent/ post-OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal
(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
28110-11-12-15243912Strongly agree10%8%6%8%-7%-9%-7%11%5%6%5%9%7%
930835149-40101131224183250Tend to agree43%29%44%30%17%31%-31%30%7%29%29%38%28%32%30%
422328237-32857919132740Neither agree nor19%21%17%24%33%24%-25%24%33%16%22%30%20%27%24%disagree
124325233224951299191635Tend to disagree
5%23%17%21%33%21%50%19%27%33%27%22%14%29%a16%21%a
212111113110425629615Strongly disagree10%12%6%9%17%8%25%8%12%13%11%15%c3%14%6%9%c
3829-131102133631013Don't know14%8%11%8%-8%25%8%6%7%7%7%9%5%10%8%
1138945160-52102181428214162AGREE52%37%50%38%17%38%-41%30%13%40%34%44%32%41%38%
336436346334137171511282250DISAGREE14%35%22%31%50%29%75%27%39%47%38%c37%c17%43%za22%30%ac
8259-214-318-3-51-117-71912NET AGREE38%2%28%8%-33%9%z-75%14%zg-9%-33%2%-2%27%zde-11%19%zb7%bdgn
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 26
Q.10.1. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury distric t area, do you agree or disagree with the fol lowing statements?There is enough housing in the district of Canterbury for people to live in decent homes they can afford
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
27/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homes PopulationHousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal
(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
-3635421155-8-1212Strongly agree-13%7%9%24%5%6%6%3%8%9%-20%zD-19%zB7%D
962587241141223111914-5050Tend to agree43%26%29%25%33%28%34%24%35%35%21%26%35%-81%zB30%B
45211032484111811167--40Neither agree nor19%22%25%31%14%28%25%24%32%27%21%22%18%--24%ABdisagree
5618522553481721635-35Tend to disagree24%26%21%16%10%29%z16%18%12%12%32%zFG28%15%70%zA-21%AF
1184443226712215-15Strongly disagree
5%4%9%13%19%5%9%12%6%9%13%16%z5%30%zA-9%AJ
2272-63346263--13Don't know10%9%8%6%-7%9%18%12%9%4%8%8%--8%AB
99311112281351328161922-6262AGREE43%39%36%34%57%32%41%29%38%42%30%26%55%zD-100%zB38%BD
67269629856142433850-50DISAGREE29%30%31%28%29%33%25%29%18%21%45%zFG45%zC20%100%zA-30%AF
32526-150714-8-1414-506212NET AGREE14%9%6%6%29%-1%16%J0%21%z21%zE-15%-19%35%z-100%100%zB7%EJ
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 27
Q.10.1. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury distric t area, do you agree or disagree with the fol lowing statements?There is enough housing in the district of Canterbury for people to live in decent homes they can afford
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
28/131
Support for building inSatisfaction with districtSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of studyStudent residenceUni ofOther/ med
Dis-Canterburystudent/ post-OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal
(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
-21-22-23-205368881725Strongly agree-20%z-19%-15%-16%15%20%13%20%13%12%17%15%
659765578167157202036325183Tend to agree29%57%z39%55%83%50%25%52%45%47%44%49%56%49%51%50%
615619131-258181212122133Neither agree nor29%14%33%16%17%20%-20%24%7%18%29%19%18%21%20%lndisagree
8749-17213246-771017Tend to disagree
38%7%22%8%-11%50%10%6%27%13%d-11%d11%10%10%dn1-1--2-11-2--2-2Strongly disagree5%-6%--1%-1%3%-4%--3%-1%
-2-3-5122-311415Don't know-2%-3%-3%25%2%6%-7%2%2%6%1%3%ah
680787510118720102628444068108AGREE29%77%z39%74%z83%65%25%68%61%67%58%68%69%62%68%65%
9759-19214348-791019DISAGREE43%7%28%8%-12%50%11%9%27%18%d-11%d14%10%12%dln
-373278582-173176182837315889NET AGREE-14%70%z11%66%z83%53%-25%57%52%40%40%68%ze58%48%58%54%e
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 28
Q.10.2. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury distric t area, do you agree or disagree with the fol lowing statements?New housing developments would help to improve the local economy
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
29/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homes PopulationHousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal
(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
1317371512271451491425Strongly agree5%13%20%9%33%17%I3%12%6%11%26%zFG7%35%zD18%23%15%DI
1412421411471481235293920262783Tend to agree67%52%49%44%52%54%44%47%35%53%55%53%50%52%44%50%
27166117103917517461133Neither agree nor10%30%19%19%5%20%31%18%26%E26%E9%23%10%12%18%20%Edisagree
117825548351017617Tend to disagree5%4%8%25%zM10%6%16%24%24%zF5%9%14%3%14%10%10%CFJ
--2--1--11-112-2Strongly disagree
--2%--1%--3%2%-1%3%4%-1%3-11-22-23-2--45Don't know
14%-1%3%-2%6%-6%5%-3%--6%3%
151559171862151014424344343541108AGREE71%65%69%53%86%71%I47%59%41%64%G81%zFG59%85%zD70%66%65%GI
119826549451129619DISAGREE5%4%11%25%z10%7%16%24%26%zEF6%9%15%5%18%10%12%J
14145091656106538383332263589NET AGREE67%61%59%L28%76%64%zI31%35%15%58%G72%zG45%80%zD52%56%54%DGIL
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 29
Q.10.2. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury distric t area, do you agree or disagree with the fol lowing statements?New housing developments would help to improve the local economy
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
30/131
Support for building inSatisfaction with districtSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of studyStudent residenceUni ofOther/ med
Dis-Canterburystudent/ post-OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal
(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
541747258447105181820283361Strongly agree24%39%39%40%33%37%100%37%30%33%40%44%31%43%33%37%
1041745462-53146191626244367Tend to agree48%39%39%38%67%40%-41%42%40%42%39%41%37%43%41%
414315-24-17725512101424Neither agree nor19%13%17%13%-15%-13%21%13%11%12%19%15%14%15%disagree
1517-8-722124279Tend to disagree
5%5%6%6%-5%-5%6%13%2%5%6%3%7%5%11-2-2-2--2--112Strongly disagree5%1%-2%-1%-2%--4%--2%1%1%
-2-2-2-2----2-22Don't know-2%-2%-1%-2%----3%-2%1%
158214926120410024113734465276128AGREE71%79%78%78%100%77%100%78%73%73%82%83%72%80%76%78%
2619-10-9223243811DISAGREE10%6%6%8%-6%-7%6%13%7%5%6%5%8%7%
1376138361104912293432424968117NET AGREE62%73%72%70%100%71%100%71%67%60%76%78%66%75%68%71%
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 30
Q.10.3. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury distric t area, do you agree or disagree with the fol lowing statements?New homes should not be built unless new infrastructure such as roads and bus routes are provided
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
31/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homes PopulationHousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal
(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
6103411935851415253016252761Strongly agree29%43%40%34%43%40%25%29%41%23%47%F41%40%50%z44%37%F
10831157331681330203214202167Tend to agree48%35%36%47%33%38%50%47%38%45%38%43%35%40%34%41%
42143211734127852924Neither agree nor19%9%16%9%10%13%22%18%12%18%13%11%13%4%15%15%Bdisagree
1323161126124329Tend to disagree5%13%2%9%5%7%3%6%6%9%2%3%10%6%3%5%M
--2-11--11-11-22Strongly disagree
--2%-5%1%--3%2%-1%3%-3%1%--2-11---2-1--12Don't know--2%-5%1%---3%-1%--2%1%
161865261668241327454562304548128AGREE76%78%76%81%76%78%75%76%79%68%85%F84%75%90%z77%78%F
13432711371353411DISAGREE5%13%5%9%10%8%3%6%9%11%2%4%13%6%6%7%
151561231461231224384459254244117NET AGREE71%65%72%72%67%70%72%71%71%58%83%zF80%zC63%84%z71%71%F
y p(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 31
Q.10.3. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury distric t area, do you agree or disagree with the fol lowing statements?New homes should not be built unless new infrastructure such as roads and bus routes are provided
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
32/131
Support for building inSatisfaction with districtSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of studyStudent residenceUni ofOther/ med
Dis-Canterburystudent/ post-OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal
(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
-26-2712612344761191928Strongly agree-25%z-23%z17%17%25%18%12%27%16%15%17%14%19%17%
747856471158173192331294776Tend to agree33%45%44%47%67%46%25%45%52%20%42%56%48%45%47%46%
321222134-278411812142135Neither agree nor14%20%11%19%17%22%-21%24%27%24%20%19%22%21%21%disagree
79412-192153373712820Tend to disagree
33%9%22%10%-12%50%12%9%20%16%7%11%18%a8%12%a4-4--5-411112145Strongly disagree
19%-22%--3%-3%3%7%2%2%3%2%4%3%
-1-1-1-1----1-11Don't know-1%-1%-1%-1%----2%-1%1%
7738835972812172629423866104AGREE33%70%z44%70%z83%62%50%63%64%47%58%71%66%58%66%63%
119812-2421944849131225DISAGREE52%9%44%10%-15%50%15%12%27%18%10%14%20%12%15%ln
-464071573062173182533255479NET AGREE-19%62%z0%60%z83%47%0%48%52%20%40%61%52%38%54%48%
(FINAL - Students onl y)Table 32
Q.10.4. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury distric t area, do you agree or disagree with the fol lowing statements?Building more homes will bring more and better facilities and amenities to this area
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL St d t l )
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
33/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
33193814324813810101028Strongly agree14%13%22%9%38%16%9%12%12%12%25%11%25%20%16%17%D
81236189431651334243216213276Tend to agree38%52%42%56%43%49%50%29%38%52%45%43%40%42%52%46%
85174320838179207101235Neither agree nor38%22%20%13%14%23%25%18%24%26%17%27%18%20%19%21%disagree
229619446561338720Tend to disagree10%9%11%19%5%10%13%24%18%8%11%18%8%16%11%12%
-131--1331114115Strongly disagree
-4%4%3%--3%18%9%2%2%1%10%zD2%2%3%--1--1---1-----1Don't know--1%--1%---2%-----1%
11155521175719717423740263142104AGREE52%65%65%66%81%66%59%41%50%64%70%54%65%62%68%63%D
2312719579671479825DISAGREE10%13%14%22%5%10%16%41%26%F9%13%19%18%18%13%15%
91243141648140836302619223479NET AGREE43%52%51%44%76%55%z44%0%24%55%G57%G35%48%44%55%48%DG
(FINAL - Students onl y)Table 33
Q.10.4. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury distric t area, do you agree or disagree with the fol lowing statements?Building more homes will bring more and better facilities and amenities to this area
Base : All
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL Students onl y)
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
34/131
3. New homes1. There is4. Buildingshould not beenough housing
more homes willbuilt unlessin the district bring more andnew2. New housingof Canterburybetterinfrastructuredevelopmentsfor people to
facilities andsuch as roadswould help tolive in decentamenities toand bus routesimprove thehomes they can
this areaare providedlocal economyafford
165165165165Total
28612512Strongly agree17%37%15%7%
76678350Tend to agree46%41%50%30%
35243340Neither agree nor21%15%20%24%disagree
2091735Tend to disagree12%5%10%21%
52215Strongly disagree3%1%1%9%
12513Don't know1%1%3%8%
10412810862AGREE63%78%65%38%
25111950DISAGREE15%7%12%30%
791178912NET AGREE48%71%54%7%
(FINAL - Students onl y)Table 34
Q.10. Summary Table. Still thinking about the whole of the Canterbury dis trict area, do you agree or disagree with the follow ing statements?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL Students onl y)
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
35/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of s tudyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total
-8-8110-7412265611A lot more than in the-8%-7%17%6%-5%12%7%4%5%9%8%6%7%past
33043233723194101612172542A little more than in14%29%22%27%50%24%50%24%27%27%22%39%zc19%26%25%25%jthe past
545449164-54125191428283866About the same as in the24%43%22%42%17%41%-42%36%33%42%34%44%43%38%40%past
1013718-28-2442961162228A little less than in48%13%39%15%
-18%
-19%12%13%20%15%17%9%
22%zb17%bnthe past2222-611422-2336A lot less than in the
10%2%11%2%-4%25%1%12%zh13%4%-3%5%3%4%hlpast
-2-3-3-3---12-33It depends-2%-3%-2%-2%---2%3%-3%2%
-1-1-11-----11-1None of these-1%-1%-1%25%-----2%2%-1%
131517-8-1322538Don't know5%3%6%4%17%4%-6%-7%7%5%3%8%3%5%
338440447238135121818223153MORE THAN IN THE PAST14%37%22%34%67%30%50%30%39%33%27%44%28%34%31%32%j
1215920-34125841161392534LESS THAN IN THE PAST57%14%50%17%-22%25%20%24%27%24%15%20%14%25%21%n
-923-52041311351112513619NET MORE-43%22%z-28%17%z67%8%25%10%15%7%2%29%zce8%20%za6%12%aej
(FINAL - Students onl y)Table 35
Q.11. Canterbury City Council has to make some important decisions about l ocal development in the whole of t he district and how many new homes it allows t o be built fo r the next twenty years.Which, if any, of these best describes your view about how much house building the Council should allow?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
36/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total
-3616311--11344511A lot more than in the-13%7%3%29%3%3%6%--21%zFG4%10%8%8%7%Fpast
7522852656--42249201142A little more than in33%22%26%25%24%30%16%35%--79%zFG32%23%40%zA18%25%FGthe past
96409442172-66-2519142866About the same as in the43%26%47%28%19%48%z53%12%-100%zEG-34%48%28%45%40%BEGpast
4789496528--15331328A little less than in19%30%9%28%M19%10%19%29%82%zEF--20%8%6%21%B17%BEFJMthe past
-1231-126--423-6A lot less than in the
-4%2%9%5%-3%12%18%zEF--5%5%6%-4%past11-1-111----1113It depends5%4%-3%-1%3%6%----3%2%2%2%
--1--1-------1-1None of these--1%--1%-------2%-1%
--61151----32448Don't know--7%3%5%6%3%----4%5%8%6%5%
78289112967--532713241653MORE THAN IN THE PAST33%35%33%28%52%33%19%41%--100%zFG36%33%48%zA26%32%FG
481012597734--19561334LESS THAN IN THE PAST19%35%12%38%zM24%10%22%41%100%zEF--26%13%12%21%21%EFJM
3018-3620-10-340538818319NET MORE14%0%21%zL-9%29%23%zI-3%0%-100%0%100%zG11%20%36%zA5%12%AIL
(FINAL Students onl y)Table 36
Q.11. Canterbury City Council has to make some important decisions about l ocal development in the whole of t he district and how many new homes it allows t o be built fo r the next twenty years.Which, if any, of these best describes your view about how much house building the Council should allow?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
37/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of s tudyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
21**10418**1186**1564**12833*15**45*41*64*65*100165Total13%**63%11%**72%4%**95%2%**78%20%*9%**27%*25%*39%*39%*61%
7868-1611241331051217Option A33%8%33%7%-10%25%9%12%7%7%7%16%8%12%10%41%47%35%47%-94%6%71%24%6%18%18%59%29%l 71%
616421-32127465912112132Option B29%15%22%18%-21%25%21%12%40%11%22%19%17%21%19%19%50%13%66%-100%3%84%13%19%16%28%38%34%66%
458566580169176252531404787Option C19%56%28%56%83%51%25%54%52%40%56%61%48%62%47%53%
5%67%6%76%6%92%1%79%20%7%29%29%36%46%54%
119-19120-1472631051621Option D5%18%-16%17%13%-11%21%13%13%7%16%8%16%13%5%90%z-90%5%95%-67%33%10%29%14%48%24%76%
3132-6-51-51-246None of these options14%1%17%2%-4%-4%3%-11%2%-3%4%4%50%17%50%33%-100%-83%17%-83%zc17%-33%ln 67%
-2-2-211--1-12-2Don't know-2%-2%-1%25%1%--2%-2%3%-1%-100%-100%-100%50%50%--50%-50%100%-
( y)Table 37
Q.12. Still thinki ng about the whole of the district of Canterbury, and taking your answer from this card, which of these options, if any, do you think the Council should chose?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
38/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**85*32*21**87*32*17**34*66*53*74*40*50*62*165Total13%**14%**52%*19%*13%**53%*19%*10%**21%*40%*32%*45%*24%*30%*38%*
22210---17727865517Option A10%9%2%31%---100%21%3%13%11%15%10%8%10%12%12%12%59%zM---100%41%zF12%41%F47%35%29%FJM 29%
76513--32-717614581332Option B33%26%6%41%--100%-21%26%11%19%13%16%21%19%22%19%16%41%zM--100%zJ-22%53%19%44%16%25%JM 41%
1011615-87--942293921292887Option C48%48%72%16%-100%--26%64%55%53%53%58%45%53%11%13%70%zL6%-100%zI--10%48%zG33%G45%24%33%GIL 32%
2415-21---54119661221Option D
10%17%18%-100%---15%6%21%12%15%12%19%13%10%19%71%L-100%---24%19%52%zF43%29%29%FIJL 57%
--23----51-31236None of these options--2%9%----15%2%-4%3%4%5%4%--33%50%----83%zEF17%-50%17%33%50%
---1----1--11-12Don't know---3%----3%--1%3%-2%1%---50%----50%--50%50%-50%
Table 38
Q.12. Still thinki ng about the whole of the district of Canterbury, and taking your answer from this card, which of these options, if any, do you think the Council should chose?
Base : All Respondents
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
T bl 39
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
39/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of st udyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
18**10115**1146**1483**12232*15**39*40*63*61*96*157Total
9756835992842092827424561106Support/ positives50%74%z40%73%z83%67%67%69%63%60%72%68%67%74%64%68%
-4-4-7-611-15167Better local economy/-4%-4%-5%-5%3%7%-3%8%2%6%4%economic conditions
2425-1018111-81910Brownfield development/11%4%13%4%-7%33%7%3%7%3%-13%zd2%9%6%bminimal impact on
Greenfield sites
416117-2111553648101121Homes/ houses22%16%7%15%-14%33%12%16%20%15%10%13%16%11%13%[affordable housing] are
needed
----------------Good infrastructure/----------------facilities [schools/
transport/ roads/hospitals]
-8-9-10-101-1643811Growth/ potential/-8%-8%-7%-8%3%-3%15%z6%5%8%7%steady/ sustainable
growth [nsf]
548552363155123191729284068More jobs/ job growth/28%48%33%46%50%43%33%45%38%20%49%43%46%46%42%43%employment opportunities
-1-21111-11--2-2More opportunity for the-1%-2%17%1%33%1%-7%3%--3%-1%jyouth/ future
generations
-10-10-10-7313154610Other options won't-10%z-9%-7%-6%9%7%8%3%8%7%6%6%work/ best option/ least
impact
217120222-18627411111324Support for increase in11%17%7%18%33%15%-15%19%13%18%10%17%18%14%15%population/ more people/
families/ students
----------------Support/ Positive other----------------
722722-35126948915142236Opposition/ negatives39%22%47%19%-24%33%21%28%27%21%23%24%23%23%23%
1313-4-321-22235Building more houses6%3%7%3%-3%-2%6%7%-5%3%3%3%3%won't create jobs/
growth/ improve theeconomy
-2-2-2-2-11--112Concerns about-2%-2%-1%-2%-7%3%--2%1%1%infrastructure/
facilities/ resources[schools/ transport/roads/ hospitals]
----------------Concerns about the type----------------of people who may come
into the area
Table 39
Q.13a. What are your main reasons for choosing Option ...?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table39
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
40/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of studyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
18**10115**1146**1483**12232*15**39*40*63*61*96*157Total
----------------Concerns about the type----------------of properties being
built
--1--1-1---1-1-1Empty homes/ fill empty--7%--1%-1%---3%-2%-1%council houses/ renovate
existing propertiesfirst
411411-18-135155771118Greenfield development/22%11%27%10%-12%-11%16%7%13%13%11%11%11%11%environmental impact/
spoiling the areasnatural beauty
2726-918111533710Overcrowding/ densely11%7%13%5%-6%33%7%3%7%3%13%5%5%7%6%populated/ too many
students
1526-7-711223448Overdevelopment/ already6%5%13%5%-5%-6%3%7%5%5%5%7%4%5%enough homes/ lack of
space
-4-4-4-4-12-1134Rapid/ unsustainable/-4%-4%-3%-3%-7%5%-2%2%3%3%expansion/ growth
----------------Don't agree with the----------------figures quoted
-----1--1---11-1Opposition other-----1%--3%---2%2%-1%
516222129-2196771092130Neutral28%16%13%19%17%20%-17%28%40%18%18%16%15%22%19%
2617-9-813123189Need to get the balance11%6%7%6%-6%-7%3%20%3%5%5%2%8%6%right/ find the middle
ground
11-3-4-4--1-3-44Maintain status quo/6%1%-3%-3%-3%--3%-5%-4%3%consistancy/ continue to
develop as currently
----------------Spread the new homes out----------------and it should be OK
17-10113-6825348614This is about the right6%7%-9%17%9%-5%25%zh13%13%8%6%13%6%9%hnumber of new homes/ not
too many new homes
----------------There'll be no----------------significant increase/
reduction of jobs
1212-3-3-1-2--33There'll be no6%2%7%2%-2%-2%-7%-5%--3%2%significant increase/
reduction in population
----------------There are enough jobs----------------here/ no unemployment
problems
Table 39
Q.13a. What are your main reasons for choosing Option ...?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table39
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
41/131
Support for building inSatisfaction withdistrictSupport for building in arealocal areaUniversity affiliationYear of studyStudent residence
Uni ofOther/ medDis-Canterburystudent/ post-
OpposeSupportOpposeSupportsatisfiedSatisfiedOther uniUni of KentChristchurchgrad3rd/ final year2nd year1st yearOff campusOn campusTotal(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)
18**10115**1146**1483**12232*15**39*40*63*61*96*157Total
----------------We need more----------------information/ to take
stock before launchingahead
---1-211---11112Other---1%-1%33%1%---3%2%2%1%1%
---1-1-1----1-11Don't know---1%-1%-1%----2%-1%1%
1-1--2-111-1-112No answer/ none/ no
6%-7%--1%-1%3%7%-3%-2%1%1%reason
Table 39
Q.13a. What are your main reasons for choosing Option ...?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Test ed (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f - z/g/h/i - z/j/k - z/l/m - z/n/o* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 40
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
42/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal (O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**83*28**21**87*32*17**28**65*53*70*38*48*58*157Total
12166513206716312473952243740106Support/ positives57%70%78%z46%95%77%zI50%18%43%72%74%74%63%77%69%68%I
1-6-241-14222417Better local economy/5%-7%-10%5%3%-4%6%4%3%5%8%2%4%economic conditions
1-631621-53313410Brownfield development/5%-7%11%5%7%6%6%-8%6%4%3%6%7%6%minimal impact on
Greenfield sites
54757662261212410821Homes/ houses24%17%8%18%33%7%19%12%7%9%23%zF17%11%21%14%13%JM[affordable housing] are
needed
----------------Good infrastructure/
----------------facilities [schools/transport/ roads/hospitals]
1172173--8243-611Growth/ potential/5%4%8%7%5%8%9%--12%z4%6%8%-10%B7%steady/ sustainable
growth [nsf]
41149415503-831233316223068More jobs/ job growth/19%48%59%z14%71%57%zI9%-29%48%43%47%42%46%52%43%Iemployment opportunities
1--1-11---22-1-2More opportunity for the5%--4%-1%3%---4%3%-2%-1%youth/ future
generations
244--82-415535210Other options won't10%17%5%--9%6%-14%2%9%7%8%10%3%6%Fwork/ best option/ least
impact
131737143-314715561224Support for increase in5%13%20%11%33%16%9%-11%22%13%21%13%13%21%15%population/ more people/
families/ students
----------------Support/ Positive other----------------
531016-131112101312131191136Opposition/ negatives24%13%12%57%-15%34%J71%36%20%23%19%29%19%19%23%JM
1-13-11322131215Building more houses5%-1%11%-1%3%18%7%3%2%4%3%4%2%3%won't create jobs/
growth/ improve theeconomy
1-1--11-1-12-2-2Concerns about5%-1%--1%3%-4%-2%3%-4%-1%infrastructure/
facilities/ resources
[schools/ transport/roads/ hospitals]
----------------Concerns about the type----------------of people who may come
into the area
----------------Concerns about the type----------------of properties being
built
Q.13a. What are your main reasons for choosing Option ...?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 40
Q 13 Wh i f h i O i ?
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
43/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEnough employment opportunitiesEnough homesPopulation
HousinggrowthJ ob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeTotal (O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J )(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)(z)
21**23**83*28**21**87*32*17**28**65*53*70*38*48*58*157Total
------1--1---1-1Empty homes/ fill empty------3%--2%---2%-1%council houses/ renovate
existing propertiesfirst
2-510-954486544418Greenfield development/10%-6%36%-10%16%24%14%12%11%7%11%8%7%11%Menvironmental impact/
spoiling the areasnatural beauty
2323-244523614210Overcrowding/ densely10%13%2%11%-2%13%J24%18%3%6%9%3%8%3%6%JMpopulated/ too many
students
2113--6223341348Overdevelopment/ already 10%4%1%11%--19%zJ12%7%5%6%6%3%6%7%5%JMenough homes/ lack ofspace
--31-3-1-2113114Rapid/ unsustainable/--4%4%-3%-6%-3%2%1%8%z2%2%3%expansion/ growth
----------------Don't agree with the----------------figures quoted
-------1--1-1-11Opposition other-------6%--2%-3%-2%1%
85143215112616613661430Neutral38%22%17%11%10%17%34%zJ12%21%25%11%19%16%13%24%19%
2151152123352439Need to get the balance10%4%6%4%5%6%6%6%7%5%6%7%5%8%5%6%right/ find the middle
ground
--22-13-22-2--14Maintain status quo/--2%7%-1%9%zJ-7%3%-3%--2%3%consistancy/ continue to
develop as currently
----------------Spread the new homes out----------------and it should be OK
626--9411102531914This is about the right29%9%7%--10%13%6%4%15%zE4%7%8%2%16%zB9%Bnumber of new homes/ not
too many new homes
----------------There'll be no----------------significant increase/
reduction of jobs
-21-1-2-11111113There'll be no-9%1%-5%-6%J-4%2%2%1%3%2%2%2%significant increase/
reduction in population
----------------There are enough jobs----------------here/ no unemployment
problems
----------------We need more----------------information/ to take
stock before launchingahead
Q.13a. What are your main reasons for choosing Option ...?
Base : All Respondents who selected an option at Q12
Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Propor tion s/Means: Colu mns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - Students onl y)
Table 40
Q 13a What are your main reasons for choosing Option ?
7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Students (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)
44/131
Key factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentEno