Date post: | 01-Nov-2014 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | marcvs-antonivs |
View: | 892 times |
Download: | 1 times |
15 Chapter Fifteen
Evaluating an Integrated
Marketing Program
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 15-1
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Pretesting for Effectiveness
• Rocket analogy
• Decision Analyst
• http://www.decisionanalyst.com
• CopyScreen
• CopyCheck
• What are the pros and cons of testing ads and marketing communication pieces at various stages of development?
15
15-2
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Chapter Overview
• Matching methods with objectives
• Message evaluations
• Evaluation criteria
• Behavioral evaluations
• Evaluating public relations
• Evaluating the IMC program
Evaluating an Integrated
Marketing Program 15
15-3
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Evaluation Categories
• Message evaluation techniques
• Physical design
• Cognitive elements
• Affective elements
• Respondent behavior evaluations
• Conative elements
• Measurable with numbers
• Customer actions
15-4
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Evaluation and IMC Objectives
• Match objectives
• Pre- and posttest analysis
• Levels of analyses
• Short-term
• Long-term
• Product-specific
• Corporate level
• Affective, cognitive, or conative
15-5
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
F I G U R E 1 5 . 1 Message Evaluation Techniques
and When to Use Them
• Concept testing Prior to ad development
• Copytesting Final stages, or finished ad
• Recall tests Primarily after ad has been launched
• Recognition tests After ad has been launched
• Attitude and opinion tests Anytime during or after ad development
• Emotional reaction tests Anytime during or after ad development
• Physiological tests Anytime during or after ad development
• Persuasion analysis After ad has been launched
Message Evaluation Method When the Test Is Normally Used
15-6
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Concept Testing • Prior to ad development
• Average cost 30-second TV ad $350,000
• Focus groups
• Concept testing instruments • Comprehension tests
• Reaction tests
15-7
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
AFLAC Concept Testing
15-8
Before launching the AFLAC duck advertising campaign, the agency
conducted concept tests to determine which idea was the best.
Click here to play clip
from AFLAC
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Copytesting • Used when marketing piece is finished
or in final stages
• Methods used
• Portfolio test
• Theater test
• Focus groups
• Mall intercept
15-9
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Copytesting
Copytesting can be
used to determine if
viewers comprehend
this ad and what their
reaction to it is.
15-10
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Copytesting
• Criticisms of copytesting
• Some agencies not using
• Stifles creativity
• Focus groups not good judge
• Support of copytesting
• Issue of accountability
• Majority support because clients want
support for ad decision
15-11
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Recall
Tests
• Day-after recall (DAR)
• Unaided recall
• Aided recall
• Incorrect answers
• Use primarily after ads launched
15-12
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
• Product name or brand
• Firm name
• Company location
• Theme music
• Spokesperson
• Tagline
• Incentive being offered
• Product attributes
• Primary selling point of communication piece
F I G U R E 1 5 . 3
Items Tested for Recall
15-13
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Recall Tests: Do Viewers Remember?
15-14
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Brand name Theme music Spokesperson Tagline Incentive Product
Attribute
Test Ad Competitor A Competitor B
Sample DAR Test 30-Second TV Advertisement for Pet Food
15-15
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Sample DAR Test 30-Second TV Advertisement for Pet Food
9.4%
16.3%
18.3%
24.6%
8.5%
14.6%
21.4%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Males Females Pet
Owners
Dog
Owners
Ages 18-
35
Ages 36-
50
Ages 51+
Overall Recall 12.9%
15-16
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Recall Decay
Magazine Ad vs. Television Ad
Source: Magazines Canada’s Research Archive
100% 100%
86%
65%75%
43%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
DAR Two days later Eight days later
Magazine Television
15-17
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Recall Tests
• Attitude towards advertising
• Prominence of brand name
• Brand used by respondent
• Institutional ads
• Respondent’s age
Factors That Influence Scores
15-18
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Recognition Tests
• Respondents shown marketing piece
• Often used with recall tests
• Good for measuring
• Reaction
• Comprehension
• Likeability
15-19
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Recognition Tests
• Expression of person’s interest
• Ad liked + 75%
• Ad interesting + 50%
• Brand used + 50%
• Affected by ad size, color, length
• Scores do not decline over time
15-20
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Recognition Tests
Can be used to measure
• Reaction
• Comprehension
• Likeability
15-21
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Attitude and Opinion Tests
• Used in conjunction with other tests
• Recall tests
• Recognition tests
• Closed-ended questions
• Open-ended questions
• Roper Start ADD + IMPACT
15-22
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Emotional Reaction Tests
• Affective advertisements
• Used for material designed to solicit emotions
• Difficult to measure emotions with questions
• Warmth monitor
• Emotional reaction tests are self-reported
instruments
15-23
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Sample Graph from a Warmth Meter 30-Second TV Advertisement
Sample Ad RatingWarmth Meter
Start 10 seconds 20 seconds 30 seconds
Target Audience
Total Audience
Ad section that elicited negative emotions
15-24
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Physiological Arousal Tests
• Measure fluctuations in a person’s body
• Psychogalvanometer – sweat
• Pupillometric test – pupils of eyes
• Psychophysiology – brain waves and
currents
• Cannot be faked easily
15-25
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Persuasion Analysis
• Appraise persuasiveness of marketing item
• Requires pre- and posttests
• ASI Market Research studies
15-26
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
• Testing procedure should be relevant to objectives.
• Researchers should agree on how the results will be used in advance.
• Multiple measures should be used.
• The test should be based on some model or theory of human response to communication.
• Testing procedure should allow for more than one exposure.
• In selecting alternate ads to include in the test, they should be at the same stage in the process as the test ad.
• The test should provide controls to avoid biases.
• Sample used for the test should be representative of the target sample.
• Testing procedure should demonstrate reliability and validity.
Source: Based on PACT document published in the Journal of Marketing, (1982) ,Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 4-29.
F I G U R E 1 5 . 6
Copytesting Principles of PACT
15-27
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
• Sales
• Response rates
• Redemption rates
• Test markets
• Purchase simulation tests
F I G U R E 1 5 . 7
Behavioral Measures
15-28
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Sales and Response Rates
• Measuring sales with UPC codes
• Scanner data
• Retailers
• Manufacturers
• Sales changes can be caused by other factors
15-29
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Difficulties in Evaluating
Advertising
• Influence of other factors on behavior
• Delayed impact of advertising
• Consumers change their mind in the store
• Whether brand is in evoked set
• Goal of ad may be to build brand equity,
not increase sales
15-30
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
• Changes in sales
• Telephone inquiries
• Response cards
• Internet inquiries
• Direct marketing responses
• Redemption rate of sales promotion offers
• Coupons, premiums, contests, sweepstakes
F I G U R E 1 5 . 9
Responses to Marketing Messages That Can Be Tracked
15-31
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
F I G U R E 1 5 . 10
Methods of Measuring Interactive Marketing
15-32
36.5%
51.0%
26.6%
41.1% 40.7%
12.2%
4.6%
24.7%
16.3%
44.5%
34.2%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
Bra
nd aw
aren
ess
Clic
kthr
oughs
Cust
omer
kno
wle
dge
Sales
Lead
gen
eratio
n
Leng
th o
f enga
gement
Mar
gin
Impre
ssions
Rede
mpt
ion
rate
s
Resp
onse ra
tes
RO
I
Source: Adapted from Larry Jaffee, “Follow the Money,” Promo, Vol. 20, No. 11 (November 2007 Sourcebook), pp. 5-10.
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Online Metrics • Adknowledge
• MarketMatch Planner • Campaign Manager
• Administrative Campaign Manager
• Audience demographics • MediaMetrix – basic demographics
• NetRatings – GRP and other rating instruments
• SRI Consulting – Psychographic information
• NetGuide – Web site ratings and descriptives
• BPA Interactive – Web traffic audit data
15-33
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Test Markets • Used to assess:
• Advertisements
• Consumer and trade promotions
• Pricing tactics
• New products
• Cost-effective method of evaluation prior to launch
• Resembles actual situation
• Design test market to model full marketing plan
• Length of test market is a concern
• Competitive actions must be considered
15-34
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Purchase Simulation Tests
• Bias in purchase intention questions
• Simulated purchase tests
• Research Systems Corporation
• Does not rely on opinions and attitudes
15-35
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
• Number of clippings
• Number of impressions
• Advertising equivalence technique
• Comparison to public relations objectives
F I G U R E 1 5 . 11
Evaluating Public Relations
15-36
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Evaluating the IMC Program
• Greater demand for accountability
• ROI of advertising and marketing
• Difficult to measure ROI – 70%
• Difficult to define ROI – 70%
15-37
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Source: Paul J. Cough, “Study: Marketers Struggle to Measure Effectiveness,” Shoot, Vol. 45, No. 29
(August 20, 2004), pp. 7-8.
T A B L E 1 5 . 2
Definitions of ROI for Marketing
Definition of ROI Percent Using
Incremental sales from marketing 66%
Changes in brand awareness 57%
Total sales revenue from marketing 55%
Changes in purchase intentions 55%
Changes in market share 49%
Ratio of advertising costs to sales 34%
Reach/frequency achieved 30%
Gross rating points delivered 25%
Post-buy analysis comparing the media plan to its delivery 21%
15-38
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
• Market share
• Level of innovation
• Productivity
• Physical and financial resources
• Profitability
• Manager performance and development
• Employee performance and attitudes
• Social responsibility
Source: Pete Drucker, Management: Tools, Responsibilities, Practices, New York: Harper and Row, 1974.
F I G U R E 1 5 . 12
Measures of Overall Health of a Company
15-39
Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
International Implications
• Assessment of IMC Programs
• Domestic results
• Results in other countries
• Overall organization
• Individual ads and promotional programs
• Local culture
• Across national boundaries
• Multinational – regional offices
15-40