+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

Date post: 07-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: tazinder-singh
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 80

Transcript
  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    1/80

    ANALYSIS OF PRICING TRENDS OF IPO

    LAUNCHED BETWEEN 2002 and 2009(NSE)

    Submittedto Lovely Professional University

    In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of degree of

    MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

    Submitted by:

    Ankit Chauhan 1090 RR1901B43

    Priyanka Thakur 10902175 RR1901B44

    Kanika Grover 1090 RR1901B47

    Shelly 10901200 RR1902A03

    Supervisor:

    Name of the Faculty Advisor

    Designation

    DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT

    LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY

    1

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    2/80

    PHAGWARA

    TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

    This is to certify that the Synopsis titled ANALYSIS OF PRICING TRENDS OF IPO

    LAUNCHED BETWEEN 2002 and 2009 (NSE) carried out by Ms. Priyanka Thakur,

    D/o______________________________has been accomplished under my guidance &

    supervisionas a duly registered MBA student of the Lovely Professional University, Phagwara.

    Her Synopsis represents his original work and is worthy of consideration for making a research

    project in the next term.

    ___________________________________

    (Name & Signature of the Faculty Advisor)

    Date:

    2

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    3/80

    TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

    This is to certify that the Synopsis titled ANALYSIS OF PRICING TRENDS OF IPO

    LAUNCHED BETWEEN 2002 and 2009 (NSE) carried out by Ms. Shelly,

    D/o______________________________has been accomplished under my guidance &

    supervisionas a duly registered MBA student of the Lovely Professional University, Phagwara.

    Her Synopsis represents his original work and is worthy of consideration for making a research

    project in the next term.

    ___________________________________

    (Name & Signature of the Faculty Advisor)

    Date:

    3

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    4/80

    TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

    This is to certify that the Synopsis titled ANALYSIS OF PRICING TRENDS OF IPO

    LAUNCHED BETWEEN 2002 and 2009 (NSE) carried out by Ms. Kanika Grover ,

    D/o______________________________has been accomplished under my guidance &

    supervisionas a duly registered MBA student of the Lovely Professional University, Phagwara.

    Her Synopsis represents his original work and is worthy of consideration for making a research

    project in the next term.

    ___________________________________

    (Name & Signature of the Faculty Advisor)

    Date:

    4

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    5/80

    TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

    This is to certify that the Synopsis titled ANALYSIS OF PRICING TRENDS OF IPO

    LAUNCHED BETWEEN 2002 and 2009 (NSE) carried out by Mr. Ankit Chauhan,

    S/o______________________________has been accomplished under my guidance & supervision

    as a duly registered MBA student of the Lovely Professional University, Phagwara.

    His Synopsis represents his original work and is worthy of consideration for making a research

    project in the next term.

    ___________________________________

    (Name & Signature of the Faculty Advisor)

    Date:

    5

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    6/80

    DECLARATION

    I, "Priyanka Thakur, hereby declare that the work presented herein is genuine work done

    originally by me and has not been published or submitted elsewhere for the requirement of a

    degree program. Any literature, data or works done by others and cited within this synopsis has

    been given due acknowledgement and listed in the reference section.

    _______________________

    (Students name & Signature)

    Date:__________________

    6

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    7/80

    DECLARATION

    I, " Kanika Grover, hereby declare that the work presented herein is genuine work done

    originally by me and has not been published or submitted elsewhere for the requirement of a

    degree program. Any literature, data or works done by others and cited within this synopsis has

    been given due acknowledgement and listed in the reference section.

    _______________________

    (Students name & Signature)

    Date:__________________

    7

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    8/80

    DECLARATION

    I, " Shelly, hereby declare that the work presented herein is genuine work done originally by me

    and has not been published or submitted elsewhere for the requirement of a degree program. Any

    literature, data or works done by others and cited within this synopsis has been given due

    acknowledgement and listed in the reference section.

    _______________________

    (Students name & Signature)

    Date:__________________

    8

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    9/80

    DECLARATION

    I, " Ankit Chauhan, hereby declare that the work presented herein is genuine work done

    originally by me and has not been published or submitted elsewhere for the requirement of a

    degree program. Any literature, data or works done by others and cited within this synopsis has

    been given due acknowledgement and listed in the reference section.

    _______________________

    (Students name & Signature)

    Date:__________________

    9

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    10/80

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    This report bears the imprint of many people, the staff of Lovely Professional University, without

    the support and guidance of whom we would not have got the opportunity to successfully

    complete this project.

    We wish to express my deep and profound sense of gratitude to our project advisor from college

    Mr Danish Khanna for her guidance and constructive support in the completion of this study.

    I take this opportunity to express my deep gratitude to all the other teachers of Lovely

    Professional University. Also, I am indebted for the rich guidance, knowledge and suggestionsprovided by Ms. Neha who took sincere efforts and illustrated the Financial Concepts as well as

    the application of various analytical tools with their vast knowledge in the field, which helped me

    a lot in completing this project effectively.

    Last but not the least we also thank all those people who helped me indirectly during the course of

    our project which helped in its completion in an effective and efficient manner.

    April 2011

    Place: - Jalandhar

    10

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    11/80

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    The project is related to know the pricing trends of IPO from 2002-2009. Before going further

    first of all brief description about IPO. IPO is the selling of securities to the public in the primary

    market. It is when an unlisted company makes either a fresh issue of securities or an offer for sale

    of its existing securities or both for the first time to the public. An IPO is the first sale of the

    corporations common shares to investors on the public stock exchange. The main purpose for the

    IPO is to raise capital for the corporation. Instead of it, there are also many reasons like Debt

    Refinancing, expansion, diversification, modernization, brand acquisitions etc. along with

    advantages there are certain disadvantages also like increased regulatory monitoring, cost of

    maintain investor relations, involves substantial expenses. When the companies are going for the

    IPOs, then there are certain eligibility norms which the every company should fulfill:

    - An unlisted company may make an offer only if they have net tangible assets of at least

    Rs 3 crores in each of preceding 3years,

    - Company should have a distributable profits,

    - Company should have a net worth of at least 1 crores.

    The need of the study is to aware the Investors regarding the investment so that they can make

    money wisely. It will be helpful for making decisions in the future. Objective of the study is to

    study the pricing trends of IPOs in India and the factors affecting the same. Factors cover in this

    study is demand for an IPO & Delay in listing. To analyze the pricing trends of IPOs of the last

    eight years, therefore our scope is limited to eight years from 2002 to 2008. Therefore, the main

    limitation of our study is the limited period and this data is from NSE only. We take only NSE

    because NSE is the first stock exchange where the shares are traded in dematerialized form.

    To analyze the pricing trends from 2002-2009, we have done research. We use descriptive

    research as we are doing the analyze of the past data. We use secondary sources for collection of

    our data. Secondary sources which are used is Internet, Research Papers, articles, journals etc. In

    our research it includes all the 253 IPOs which is issued in National Stock Exchange from 2002 to

    2009. We are using three variables Demand of IPO, Delay in Listing and Price of Issue i.e.

    underpriced or overpriced. In these, demand of IPO and Delay in Listing are the Independent

    11

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    12/80

    Variables and Pricing of the issue is dependent variable. Tools which are used is Ms Excel,

    Regression, SSPS, MiniTab.

    Hypothesis:-

    1. H(0) There is a relation between IPO under pricing, demand for IPO & delay in listing

    2. H(1) there is no relation between demand for IPO and Delay in listing

    By using MS excel, first of all we have calculated returns of the IPOs for the first day, tenth day

    and from first to tenth day. Lets suppose for calculating the return for the first day formula used

    is: return of 1st

    day closing price / closing price. And then calculate the delay in listing. By

    calculating these, we come to know the whether the IPO is underpriced or overpriced.

    In this study we come to know that most of the IPOs are underpriced, because most of the returns

    from 1st to 10th is in negative. This shows that IPOs are underpriced. When the demand is high, It

    means that demand of the issue is high but it is priced low which depicts that IPO is underpriced.

    Out of 253, 131 IPOs are underpriced. This shows that IPOs are underpriced. When we come to

    know that IPOs are underpriced, then we calculate degree of underpriced by applying the formula:

    Deg_underpricing = (Pclosing on listing day Poffer)/ Poffer

    Where, P is the price of the stock

    REGRESSION MODEL:-

    Regression model to be estimated then is,

    Degree Underpricing = B0+ B1(Listing Delay) + B2(Demand)+ e

    Where, e is the error team with the distribution N (0,1)

    12

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    13/80

    The regression equation clearly tells that listing delay has much more impact on degree of pricing

    of the issue as compared to demand for the IPO. Similarly it is clear from the model that listing

    delay has direct relation and impact on degree of pricing whereas demand is negatively relates to

    degree of pricing.

    Another important parameter driving the under pricing negatively is the listing delay. Also we

    have found that out of 243, only 134 companies are under price i.e. 56% companies are

    underpriced indicating that most of companies keep their price lower than their intrinsic value to

    make IPO successful.

    13

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    14/80

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    CHAPTER PARTICULARS PAGE No.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    1.1 INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING 10

    1.2 FOLLOW ON PUBLIC OFFERING 10

    1.3 REASONS FOR GOING PUBLIC 10-11

    1.4 ADVANTAGES OF GOING PUBLIC 12

    1.5 DISADVANTAGES OF GOING PUBLIC 12-13

    1.6 ELIGIBILITY NORMS FOR IPO 13

    1.7 PRICING 14

    1.8CONCEPT OF UNDERPRICING 14-17

    2. NEED AND OBJECTIVES

    19

    2.1 NEED OF THE STUDY 19-20

    2.2 OBJECTIVES 20

    2.3 SCOPE OF THE STUDY 20

    3. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 22-26

    4. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY4.1 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 28

    4.2 RESEARCH PLAN 28

    4.3 RESEARH DESIGN 28

    4.4 RESEARCH TOOLS 28-31

    4.5 DATA COLLECTION

    4.6 HYPOTHESIS32

    5. ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 34-52

    6.FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS, CONCLUSION and

    LIMITATIONS

    7.

    8.

    6.1 FINDINGS

    6.2 CONCLUSIONS

    6.3 LIMITATIONS

    6.4 RECOMMENDATIONS

    BIBILIOGRAPY

    APPENDIX.

    54

    54

    54-55

    55

    57-58

    60-87

    14

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    15/80

    CHAPTER I

    INTRODUCTION

    15

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    16/80

    INTRODUCTION

    A company can raise capital through issue of shares and debentures. The various types of issues

    are:-

    Public issue

    Right issue

    Bonus issue

    Private placement

    There can be two types ofpublic issue:-

    Initial public offer (IPO)

    Follow On public Offer (FPO)

    16

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    17/80

    INITIAL PUBLIC OFFER

    An initial public offer is the selling of securities to the public in the primary market. It is when an

    unlisted company makes either a fresh issue of securities or an offer for sale of its existing

    securities or both for the first time to the public. This paves way for listing and trading of the

    issuers securities. The sale of securities can be through book building and normal public issue.

    An IPO is the first sale of the corporations common shares to investors on the public stock

    exchange. The main purpose for the IPO is to raise capital for the corporation. While IPOs are

    effective at raising capital, being listed on the stock exchange imposes heavy regulatory

    compliance and reporting requirements

    An initial public offer occurs when security is sold to the general public, with the expectation that

    liquid market will develop. Most companies are starting out by raising equity capital from a small

    number of investors, with no liquid market existing if these investors wish to sell their stock. If a

    company prospers and need an additional equity capital, at some point the firm generally finds it

    desirable to go public by selling stock to large number of diversified investors.

    FOLLOW-ON PUBLIC OFFER

    Further public issues are issued by companies and corporate bodies whose shares are already

    being traded in the capital market and they are issuing fresh shares either to fund the expansion of

    existing business or to invest into the business activities.

    REASONS FOR GOING PUBLIC:

    1. Financing of the increased working capital requirement.

    2. Raising funds to finance capital requirement programs like expansion, diversification,

    modernization etc.

    3. Debt refinancing.

    17

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    18/80

    4. Financing acquisitions like a manufacturing unit, brand acquisitions, tender offers for

    share of another firm.

    ADVANTAGES OF GOING PUBLIC

    1. Facilitates future funding by means of subsequent public offering.

    2. Enables Valuation of company.

    3. Provides liquidity to existing shares.

    4. Increase visibility and reputation of the company.

    5. Command better pricing than placement with few investors.

    6. Enables the company to offer its shares as purchase consideration or as an exchange for

    the shares of another company.

    7. Enabling cheaper access to capital.

    8. Exposure, prestige and public image.

    9. Attracting and retaining better management and employees through liquid equity

    participation.

    10. Facilitating acquisitions

    11. Creating multiple financing opportunities: equity, convertible debt, cheaper bank loans,

    etc.

    12.Increased liquidity for equity holder

    DISADVANTAGES OF GOING PUBLIC

    1. Involves substantial expenses like significant legal, accounting and marketing costs.

    2. Need to make continuous disclosures.

    3. Listing fees and documentation.

    18

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    19/80

    4. Cost of maintaining investor relations.

    5. Takes substantial amount of management time and efforts.

    6. Increased regulatory monitoring.

    7. Risk that required funding will not be raised.

    8. Public dissemination of information which may be useful to competitors, suppliers and

    customers.

    ELIGIBILITY NORMS FOR IPO

    An unlisted company may make an initial public offering (IPO) of equityshares only if

    The company has net tangible assets of at least Rs. 3 crores in each of the preceding 3

    Full years (of 12 months each), of which not more than 50% is held in monetary assets.

    The company has a track record ofdistributable profits in terms of Section 205 of the

    Companies Act, 1956, for at least three (3) out of immediately preceding five years.

    The company has a net worth of at least Rs. 1 crore in each of the preceding 3 full Years

    (of 12 months each).

    In case the company has changed its name within the last one year, at least 50% of the

    revenue for the preceding 1 full year is earned by the company from the activity

    Suggested by the new name.

    The aggregate of the proposed issue and all previous issues made in the same financial

    Year in terms of size (i.e., offer through offer document + firm allotment + promoters

    Contribution through the offer document), does not exceed five (5) times its pre-issue Net worth

    as per the audited balance sheet.

    Alternative routes

    Recognizing that many good companies, for one reason or the other, may not be able to

    comply with all the eligibility norms, two other alternative routes are available to such

    companies:

    Alternative I:

    i) Issue shall be through book building route, with at least 50% to be mandatory allotted toQIBs.

    19

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    20/80

    ii) The minimum post issue face value capital shall be rs.10 crores.

    OR

    Alternative II:

    i) The project is appraised and participated to the extent of 15% by FIs/Scheduled

    commercial banks of which at least 10% comes from the appraiser(s).

    ii) The minimum post- issue face value capital shall be Rs. 10 crores or there shall be a

    compulsory market-making for at least 2 years. In addition to satisfying the aforesaid

    eligibility norms, the company shall also satisfy the criteria of having at least 1000

    prospective allottees in its issue.

    PRICING

    Before establishment of SEBI in 1992, the quality of disclosures in the offer documents was very

    poor. The main drawback of free pricing was the process of pricing of issues. The issue

    price was determined around 60-70 days before the opening of the issue and the issuer had no

    clear idea about the market perception of the price determined.

    In Book Building the price is determined on the basis of demand received or at price above or

    equal to the floor price.

    The Allotment Process through Book-building:

    Step1-The Company will 'discover' its price

    Earlier, the company determined a fixed price for the stock issue. The issue was

    marketed to the general public through advertisements and a media campaign.

    Today, companies prefer a book building process. Book-building is the process ofprice discovery. That means there is no fixed price for the share. Instead, the company issuing

    the shares comes up with a price band. The lowest price is referred to as the floor and the highest,

    the cap. Bids are then invited for the shares. Each investor states how many shares s/he wants and

    what s/he is willing to pay for those shares (depending on the price band). The actual price is then

    discovered based on these bids.

    Step2-Players of the game

    The classes of investors can bid for the shares:

    20

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    21/80

    Qualified Institutional Buyers: QIBs include mutual funds and Foreign Institutional

    Investors. At least 50% of the shares are reserved for this category.

    Retail investors: Anyone who bids for shares under Rs 1,00,000 is a retail investor. At

    least 25% is reserved for this category.

    The balance bids are offered to high net worth individuals and employees of the company.

    Individuals who apply for the IPO put in their bids. The process is transparent. One can check on

    the issue subscription at the BSE and NSE Web Sites. After evaluating the bid prices, the

    company will accept the lowest price that will allow it to dispose the entire block of shares.

    That is called the cut-off price.

    The process can be illustrated with an example:

    Number of shares issued by the company = 100.

    Price band = Rs 30 - Rs 40.

    If individuals have bid for prices as follows:

    7 BID NUMBER OF SHARES PRICE PER SHARES (Rs)

    1 20 40

    2 10 38

    3 20 37

    4 30 36

    5 20 35

    6 20 33

    7 20 30

    The shares will be sold at the Bid 5 price of 20 shares for Rs 35.

    Why?

    Because Bidders 1 to 5 are willing to pay at least Rs 35 per share.

    The total bids from Bidders 1 to 5 ensure all 100 shares will be sold (20 + 10 + 20 + 30

    21

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    22/80

    +20). The cut-off price is therefore Bid 5's price = Rs 35.

    Concept of under pricing

    Generally, it has been found that investors, who purchase IPOs on the offering day, experience

    high returns on the first trading day, indicating that these shares may have been priced at the time

    of their offering to the public at values much below their intrinsic value. The phenomenon is

    known as under pricing.

    Under pricing of issue represents the first day returns generated by the firm, calculated as:

    Closing Price Offer price/ Offer price

    An issue is under (over) priced if the price received by the issuer in the primary market is lower

    (higher) than the price of the same securities in the secondary market.

    Under pricing of IPOs is a universal phenomenon! Loughran, Ritter and Rysquist (1994) has

    been summary of the equally weighted average initial returns on IPOs in a number of countries

    around the world in the form of an illustrative table, which has been updated till April 13, 2001

    ( as shown in Table 1) . It provides the cross-sectional variation in under pricing, ranging from a

    low of 4.2% in France to a high of 388% in China. Under pricing is ubiquitous but the amount of

    under pricing varies across countries. They have contended that differences in under pricing might

    result from differences in institutional arrangements.

    Making a firm public is significant turning point in the life of a firm with serious wealth

    implications for the existing shareholders. The success of the public listing depends, among other

    factors, on the ability to determine an offer price. This is a difficult process. Thus, if the firms

    22

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    23/80

    shares are overvalued, their sale to the public will fail; if it succeeds, it will entail a transfer of

    wealth from the new shareholders to the old ones.

    In case the new shares are undervalued the old shares will relinquish a claim on the firms cash

    flows at a price below its fair value. To avoid certain uncertainties involved in the public sale of

    their securities, firms retain underwriters who undertake the risk of pricing and selling the new

    securities. The conditions under which new securities are offered to the public and the role of

    underwriter are both affected by the regulatory and institutional environment of local IPO market.

    SEBI Guidelines about Pricing

    A company eligible to make a public issue may freely price its equity shares. An eligible

    Infrastructure company and public or private sector bank can also freely price their equity shares,

    as specified by SEBI and RBI respectively from time to time.

    Price Band

    Issuer company can mention a price band of 20% (cap in the price band should not be more than

    20% of the floor price) in the date before filing of the offer document with ROCs.

    IPO Activity in NSE

    Table 5.2: IPO Activity in NSE (over a considered time period)

    YEAR NUMBER OF IPO

    2000 9

    2001 2

    2002 2

    2003 5

    2004 15

    2005 40

    2006 65

    2007 942008 36

    2009 21

    The table gives the frequency of the book- built IPOs in India with respect to the year of issue and

    the issue size. As it is evident from the table that the number of IPOs listed on National Stock

    Exchange were quite less from the year 1999 to 2003 as compared to the number listed on from

    the year 2004 to 2007. There were twenty IPOs in total from 1999 to 2003 whereas year 2004

    alone witnessed the listing of twenty IPOs. Afterwards the IPOs number has followed anincreasing trend up to 2007. and the growth rate from the year 2004 to 2007 is 38.8%.whereas the

    23

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    24/80

    growth rate from the year 1999 to 2003 has a negative growth rate of 53.33%.So we may say that

    the time frame from the year 1999 to 2003 represents a cold issue marketfor the NSE while the

    time frame from 2004 to 2007 represents the hot issue market.

    CHAPTER II

    NEED AND

    OBJECTIVES

    24

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    25/80

    NEED OF THE STUDY:

    This research is mainly related with pricing of the IPOs. IPOs refer to equity stocks issues when a

    corporation first initiates public trading of its shares. The study will depict the true picture of

    degree of pricing of IPOs, the relation of the pricing trends with variables affecting them as

    IPOs are one of the most invested avenues.

    Initial public offerings in India are usually underpriced. A stock issue is

    deemed to be underpriced if the closing price on the first day of listing is higher than the IPO

    price. Even though the book building methodology is an improvement over fixed price IPOs,

    issues continue to be significantly underpriced.

    OBJECTIVE:

    To study the pricing trend of IPOs issued at NSE between 2002 & 2009.

    To study impact of demand for IPO and pricing trend.

    To study impact of delay in listing and pricing trend.

    25

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    26/80

    SCOPE OF THE STUDY

    This project is mainly to know the pricing trends of IPO between 2002 & 2009. Thats why in the

    scope it included all the issues of NSE between 2002 & 2009. The study is related to all those IPO

    issues.

    26

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    27/80

    27

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    28/80

    CHAPTER III

    REVIEW OF

    LITERATURE

    REVIEW OF LITERATURE:

    Blum (1973) examined the issues of relative performance of the over-the-counter market with the

    initial common stock offerings, under pricing, and the risk involved thereof. The total period had

    been covered by the study w.e.f Jan 19, 1965 to June 30, 1970 with a random sample of 400

    initial common stock offerings. The market returns and risks associated with these 400 issues

    have been calculated for 16 time periods, ranging from one week to one year after the offering

    date. The study conducted so far suggests that the investment bankers have either underpriced or

    pushed in the after-market those IPOs in which they held greatest financial interest.

    28

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    29/80

    Barons M (1982) in his model explains the contracting mechanism when the investment banker

    has better information than the issuer about the IPO market. Since the issuer cannot monitor the

    investment banker without cost, in order to incentivize the investment banker, the issuer lets the

    investment banker under price the issue (optimal delegation). Baron uses the term, delegation is

    contracting to model the situation in which an issuer not only needs the services of the

    investment banker for distribution of the IPO, but also needs his advice for setting the offer price.

    Rock S (1986) in his model discusses firm commitment offerings. He showed that those investors

    who are more informed (than the firm as well as other investors) about high under pricing offers

    (high first rate return) are able to get a higher allocation share than uninformed investors in such

    issues. On the other hand, these informed investors withdraw issues which are overpriced

    (negative first day returns), leaving the uninformed investors with the winners curse problem,

    which means that they get all the shares that they ask for, but these shares are worthless in terms

    of first day returns. In such a scenario, the uninformed investors would not participate in any issue

    fearing the winners curse problem. Hence, in order to attract such investors and fully sell its

    issue, the firm must under price its IPOs.

    Benveniste S (1989) model is for book building and predicts that under pricing is necessary to

    acquire true information from the more informed investors. Thus, those issues which are offered

    on the higher side of a price band mentioned in the book building will be more underpriced than

    the others.

    Pagano et. Al (1998), in their study of Italian firms, find that firms going public are not seeking

    money for growth but are rebalancing their account after high investment and growth. The post-

    IPO period sees a reduction in leverage as well as investment. They state that going public is a

    conscious choice that some firms make, while some others prefers to remain private.

    Wang K (1998) researched that differences in under pricing for initial public offerings (IPOs)

    brought to market in Hong Kong, Singapore, and the United States. It intends to determine

    whether IPO pricing accuracy in Hong Kong is facilitated by the development and disseminationof pre-deal research. Pre-deal research can enhance IPO pricing accuracy; the overall finding

    29

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    30/80

    should be useful to regulators in Hong Kong and Singapore as they continue to evaluate the extent

    to which pre-deal research should be allowed and other IPO related policy making.

    Chemmanur (1993) presents an information-theoretic model of IPO pricing in which insiders sell

    stock, in both the IPO and the secondary market, have costly private information about

    performance of the firm. High value firms, which know that they are going to pool with the low-

    value firms, induced outsiders to engage in information production by under pricing, which

    compensates outsiders for the cost of producing information. So under pricing results from

    insiders inducing information production in order to have a more precise valuation of their firm in

    secondary market.

    Madhusoodanan and Thiripalraju (1997) analyze the Indian IPO market for the short term as

    well as long term under pricing. They also examine the impact of the issue size on the extent of

    under pricing in these offerings and the performance of the merchant bankers in pricing these

    issues. The study indicates that, in general, the under pricing in the Indian IPOs in the short run is

    higher than the experiences of other countries. In the long-run too, Indian offerings have given

    high returns compared to negative returns reported from other countries. The study also reveals

    that none of the merchant bankers showed any better pricing capabilities.

    Sarig and Wohl (1998) analyze in the given article The Demand for Stocks: An Analysis of

    IPO Auctions that demand schedules are relatively flat around the auction clearing price. The

    average elasticity is 37. The elasticity is low when the return distribution contains a large unique

    component. We also find a significant average abnormal return of 4.5% on the first trading day

    and a positive correlation between the abnormal return and the elasticity of demand.

    HenslerD.(1998) in his study over/ under pricing of Initial Public Offerings explained why

    the issue is under or overpriced and the main reason which they find is lawsuit avoidance . The

    main purpose of this article to show the simple model that lawsuit avoidance hypothesis can

    explain not only under pricing but also overpricing. The theory herein suspects explicit treatment

    of the litigation costs versus offering revenues arguments used in those models in favor of a

    probability-of-lawsuit argument. There are two major contributions from this study. First, the

    model predicts overpricing under the lawsuit avoidance hypothesis. Second, while other models30

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    31/80

    focus on the on-average under pricing phenomenon, the model herein presents a continum of

    pricing which spans overpricing, under pricing, and pricing the IPO at its intrinsic value.

    Wharton P (2001) in his article Who profits from IPO under pricing? explained what is the

    main reason behind issues under pricing. In the Indian as well as in the foreign market IPOs are

    underpriced and there is main reason behind that. In his studies he found that in U.S. IPOs are

    underpriced on an average of 15%. Thus, at the end of the first day of trading, the stock price of a

    company is typically 15 percent higher than the initial price set by the underwriter. Conventional

    wisdom has held that the gap is inevitable given the risks in taking public a young company that

    often has little or no track record. Robert E. hoskisson and three other universities concluded that

    a concept used to sort out the interests of owners and managers and under pricing of IPOs occurs

    because it is in the interests of some of the key players.

    BoultanT. (2001)in their study IPOunder pricing and international corporate governance

    is focused on IPO under pricing establishes that typical IPO stock rises above the initial offer

    price after one trading day and hence issuing company get short term returns. But this IPO under

    pricing studies varies internationally. Examining a sample of 4462 IPOs across 29 countries from

    2000 to 2004, we find that IPOs in all countries are underpriced, with a mean first-day return near

    28%. Under pricing varies dramatically across countries. The standard deviation of mean under

    pricing across countries is approximately 13.6%. Some variation results from differences in firmand deal characteristics, such as the offer size, current market conditions, the issuer's industry, and

    whether the firm is backed by a high-reputation underwriter. Most importantly, however, we find

    that under pricing is higher for firms going public in countries with corporate governance systems

    that strengthen the position of investors relative to insiders.

    Ritter and Welch (2002) examined three main aspects i.e. why firms go public, why they reward

    first day investors with considerable under pricing and how IPOs perform in the long run. The

    31

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    32/80

    study explains the Life cycle theories and Market timing theories. This study presents both

    theoretical and empirical evidence for short run and long run underperformance of IPOs and

    shows that the under pricing is sensitive to methodology and to the time period being chosen.

    Second, Fama-French Multifactor regressions could produce odd results.

    Lowry M (2003) stated in his research that IPO volume fluctuates substantially over time. The

    aggregate capital demands of private firms, the adverse-selection costs of issuing equity, and the

    level of investor optimism can explain these fluctuations. Firms' demands for capital and investor

    sentiment are important determinants of IPO volume, in both statistical and economic terms.

    Adverse-selection costs are also statistically significant, but their economic effect appears small.

    Ljungqvist and Boehmer (2004) examine in the article On the Decision to Go Public:

    Evidence from Privately-held Firms that there may be many reason why company go

    publically?

    1) More companies will go public when outside valuations are high or have

    increased,

    2) Companies prefer going public when uncertainty about their future profitability is

    high,

    3) Firms whose controlling shareholders enjoy large private benefits of control are

    less likely to go public.

    Brau and Fawcett (2004) describe in the article Initial Public Offerings: An Analysis of

    Theory and Practice that by creating a survey on 330 CFOs it found that the primary motive of

    a firm is acquisition for going public. Because majority feel that firms want to expand its business

    so by raising capital through IPOs they can acquire another firm. But CFOs also have different

    opinions about the IPO process depending on firm-specific characteristics and objectives. Also we

    find that the main reason for remaining private is to preserve decision-making control and

    ownership.

    32

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    33/80

    Beverly and Marshall (2004) describe the hypothesis that the financial characteristics of the

    issuing firm, along with the availability of alternative sources of financing, are important

    determinants of the level of under pricing. While risk and its relationship to underpricing have

    been examined in previous studies, liquidity risk is unique because of its special implications for a

    firm's bargaining position with the underwriter. Consistent with my hypothesis, firms with greater

    liquidity concerns at the IPO experience greater underpricing. On the other hand, firms with

    higher levels of venture capital funding and/or debt financing are more fully priced.

    Ghosh S. (2004) identify in the article IPO Underpricing in India that there are some factor

    explaining IPO underpricing in an emerging economy. In this article we find a negative relation of

    underpricing and volatility. This contradiction could be due to the investors' optimism during the

    offer period and subsequent revision in prices (immediately after listing) with the availability of

    new information during the long offer-listing period. The high average risk, significant negative

    relation between risk and underpricing during the high volume period and insignificant relation of

    the same during the cold period suggest that some of the issuers took the advantage of investors'

    optimism to collect as much money as possible during the hot period.

    Bhagmati J. (2005) in her study Why Bother About IPO Pricing explores that though book

    building methodology is better than fixed pricing but still the issues are underpriced. The price

    quoted on the last bid becomes the price at which demand is deemed to meet supply and all

    bidders pay this price for their allotments. If the issue is oversubscribed, allocation is done on a

    prorate basis providing for equitable treatment across investor categories. She summarized that

    book building results in under pricing IPOs. Such pricing bias leads to a scramble for allotment.

    Under these circumstances, no matter how vigilant or efficient the regulating agencies, it is

    difficult if not impossible to stamp out wrong doing. This is particularly true in India as we do not

    have national identity numbers and our justice system finds it difficult to secure convictions.

    Consequently, we need to try out IPO auctions, on an experimental basis, as a way of improving

    price discovery.

    Demers. E. (2006) stated that the factors associated with IPO failures by developing an IPOfailure prediction model that includes accounting information as well as proxies for the role of

    33

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    34/80

    information intermediaries and other IPO deal-related characteristics. The IPO long-run returns

    anomaly persists for high failure risk firms.IPO failure forecasting models for each of the two

    sectors. Those forecasts are negatively associated with one-year post-IPO abnormal returns.

    S. Viswanathan (2006) This article examines the pricing of the initial public offerings (IPOs) that

    follow insurance company demutualizations. Insurers that convert from mutual to stock form

    typically cite the need for capital as a key motivation. Given that capital adequacy is a primary

    regulatory objective for insurers; one would expect that for a given number of shares to be sold,

    these firms would price their offerings to maximize proceeds. By examining the initial and long-

    run stock returns for these conversion IPOs, the existence and degree of underpricing, as

    characterized by large initial returns, can be determined. Attractive returns are sustained for both

    groups of insurers during the first few years after IPO.

    Edwards K. (2007) describe in the given article Short Selling in Initial Public Offerings that

    short selling is a characteristic of the aftermarket and it is higher in IPOs with greater

    underpricing. Short sellers do not appear to earn abnormal profits in the near term and our

    findings are that it can be a factor for underpricing of an IPO. Short selling in IPOs is not as

    constrained as suggested by the literature, implying that other factors may be responsible forunderpricing.

    Lee G (2007) stated that financial intermediaries participating in the IPO process appear to play a

    significant role in restraining earnings management. IPO is negatively related to the reputations of

    underwriters and venture capital (VC) investors. We find strong evidence that more reputable

    investment banks are associated with significantly less earnings management. Neither VC

    investment, nor backing by more reputable VCs significantly restrains earnings management by

    IPO issuers.

    Vaidayanathan (2007) studies the price performance of IPOs in the NSE. The study suggests that

    the demand generated for an issue during book building and the listing delay positively impact the

    first day under pricing whereas the effect of money spent on the marketing of the IPO is

    insignificant.

    34

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    35/80

    CHAPTER IV

    RESEARCH

    METHODOLOGY

    35

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    36/80

    RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

    Research Design

    It is a blue print for the fulfillment of objectives and answering questions. The research design

    used in the study is descriptive research.

    Descriptive research:

    Descriptive research is that kind of research where the researcher has no control over the

    variables. Reporter can only report what has happened or what is going to happen. But these

    incidents cannot be changed by the researcher.

    Sample Design

    The following factors have to decide within the scope of sample design:

    i. Sample Size: - It includes all the IPOs issued in National Stock Exchange between 2002

    & 2009.

    ii. Sample Unit: It indicates who is to be surveyed. In this study we cover all the IPOs of

    National stock exchange.

    iii. Sampling Technique: For the purpose of this research Convenient Sampling is being

    used.

    iv. Tools & Techniques :

    a) MS- Excel

    b) Regression

    c) SPSS

    d) Minitab

    36

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    37/80

    Independent variable demand of IPO, delay in listing (time-period)

    Dependent variable Degree of pricing of the issue.

    Data Collection

    In this study data is collected from following sources:

    i) Secondary data:

    Secondary data are those which have already been collected by someone else and which have

    already been passed through the statistical process. In this case one is not confronted with the

    problems that are usually associated with the collection of original data. Secondary data either is

    published data or unpublished data. In this study secondary data is collected from web site of

    NSE, articles, journals.

    Methodology:

    To test whether a stock has been priced at its intrinsic worth or not and to determine the

    magnitude and degree of the deviations of market price of the stock from its offer price, returns

    have been computed. If the returns are positive, the indication is that of under pricing whilenegative returns imply overpricing.

    The initial return on IPOs has been computed as the difference between the closing price on first

    day of trading and the offer price, divided by the offer price.

    R_Ret. = P1 - Po * 100/ Po --------------------- (i)

    Where R_Ret. = subscribers initial return (hereafter raw return)

    P1 = closing price on the first day of tradingPo = Offer price

    37

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    38/80

    HYPOTHESIS: -

    1. H(0) There is no relation between degree of pricing of IPO with demand for IPO &

    delay in listing.

    2. H(1) There is relation between degree of pricing of IPO with demand for IPO & delay in

    listing:-

    The issues which are finally priced towards the higher end of the offer price band would

    be underpriced more, as compared to issues which are finally priced towards the lower end

    of the price band. The degree of under pricing is a function of the popularity of the IPO in

    the market demand. If there is good demand in the market for an issue, then the merchant

    banker fixes an offer price which is on the higher side of the price band available for

    bidding. On the contrary, if there is low demand for an issue, then the offer price would be

    fixed at the lower end of the band. The fixation of the price at the higher end of band is

    likely to send a signal to the market about good demand for the issue and is likely to result

    in a higher listing price as well as trading price on opening day of the listing of the stock.

    The degree of under pricing is hypothesized to be positively correlated with listing delay.

    This is because investors who face illiquidity because of long delay in listing would

    demand more premiums in the first day of listing and may take positions likewise in the

    market. Thus, the hypothesis examined is that a longer time to list increases the degree of

    the under pricing of the firm.

    38

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    39/80

    CHAPTER V

    39

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    40/80

    ANALYSIS AND

    INTERPRETATION

    MODEL: -

    INDEPENDENT VARIABLE:-

    40

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    41/80

    1. Time- period: The listing delay of the firm from the last day of the offer to the day of

    listing

    (The degree of under pricing was measured as the ratio of difference in closing price on the day of

    listing and offer prices to the offer price)

    2. Demand: Demand for the issue

    (Those issues whose final offer price was greater than mean of the price band were classified

    as high demand issues;

    While those with an offer price less than or equal to the mean of the band size were classified

    as low demand issues)

    DEPENDENT VARIABLE:

    Degree of pricing of the Issue Whether the issue is underpriced or overpriced.

    Name of the Issue Price Range Issue Price Demand Time(Day

    s)

    D. B. CORP LIMITED Rs. 185 - Rs. 212 212 High 22

    GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED Rs. 490 - Rs. 530 490 Low 24

    JSW ENERGY LIMITED Rs. 100 - Rs. 115 100 Low 26

    MBL INFRASTRUCTURES

    LIMITED

    Rs. 165 - Rs. 180 180 High 41

    COX AND KINGS (INDIA)

    LIMITED

    Rs. 316 - Rs. 330 330 High 21

    ADANI POWER LIMITED Rs 90 - Rs 100 100 High 20

    RAJ OIL MILLS LIMITED Rs 100 - Rs 120 120 High 20

    EXCEL INFOWAYS LIMITED Rs 80 - Rs 85 85 High 17

    MAHINDRA H & R INDIA Rs 275 - Rs 325 300 Low 20

    41

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    42/80

    LIMITED

    EDSERV SOFTSYSTEM LIMITED Rs 55 - Rs 60 60 High 21

    PIPAVAV SHIPYARD LIMITED Rs 55 - Rs 60 58 High 21

    OIL INDIA LIMITED Rs 950 - Rs 1050 1050 High 20

    GLOBUS SPIRITS LIMITED Rs 90 - Rs 100 100 High 21

    JINDAL COTEX LIMITED Rs 70 - Rs 75 75 High 21

    NHPC Rs 30 - Rs 36 36 High 21

    ASTEC LIFESCIENCES LIMITED Rs.77 To Rs.82 82 High 21

    DEN NETWORKS LIMITED Rs. 195 To Rs.

    205.

    195 Low 15

    INDIABULLS POWER LIMITED Rs.40 To Rs.45 45 High 25

    THINKSOFT GLOBAL SERVICES

    LIMITED

    Rs.115 To Rs.125 125 High 21

    CALCULATION OF DEGREE_UNDERPRICING

    42

    http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=5&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=6&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=7&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=8&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=8&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=5&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=6&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=7&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=8&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=8&yr=2009
  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    43/80

    Degree under pricing = (Pclosing on listing day Poffer)/ Poffer

    Where, P is the price of the stock.

    Graph showing degree of pricing of IPOs issued in 2009 at NSE.

    43

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    44/80

    REGRESSION MODEL:-

    Regression model to be estimated then is,

    Degree pricing = B0+ B1(Listing Delay) + B2(Demand)+ e

    Where, e is the error team with the distribution N (0, 1)

    Descriptive Statistics

    N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

    Demand 243 0 1 .83 .375

    Listng_delay 242 11.00 511.00 23.9132 38.05909

    Pricing 242 -.86 15.84 .0498 1.03576

    Valid N

    (listwise)242

    As can be seen from table above, the degree of pricing in the sample is varying from -0.86% to

    15.84% with the mean value of 0.0498%. The listing delay is 24 days on the average and varies

    between 11 to 511 days.

    The returns on the first day of trading were taken to calculate the degree of pricing. There were

    only 4 firms (21%) in the sample which got listed at a discount to their offer price (overpricing),

    whereas 15 firms (79%) in the sample got listed at a premium (under pricing) in year 2009. If we

    look at over view 243 IPOs were issued at NSE between 2002 & 2009 from which 134 were

    underpriced i.e approximately 56% of IPOs were underpriced.

    44

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    45/80

    ESTIMATION OF THE REGRESSION EQUATION:

    Based on the hypothesis and the variables defined earlier, the following regression equation is

    estimated:

    Degree Under pricing = B0+ B1(Listing Delay) + B2(Demand)+ e

    Where e is the error term.

    Coefficients

    Model

    Unstandardized

    Coefficients

    Standardized

    Coefficients

    t Sig.B Std. Error Beta

    1 (Constant) .387 .165 2.353 .019

    Demand -.406 .176 -.147 -2.302 .022

    Listing delay 3.830 .002 .000 .002 .998

    a. Dependent Variable: Pricing

    The regression equation is

    Degree = 0.387 + 3.830 Listing delay - 0.406 Demand+ e

    The variables are defined as follows:

    Demand is a dummy variable which takes a value of 0 if the issue is offered close to the lower

    band of the band and 1 otherwise; listing delay is the time in days between the day of close of the

    offer and the day of listing.

    45

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    46/80

    Model Summary

    Mod

    el R

    R

    Square

    Adjusted R

    Square

    Std. Error

    of the

    Estimate

    Change Statistics

    R Square

    Change

    F

    Change df1 df2

    Sig. F

    Change

    1 .147a .022 .014 1.02872 .022 2.655 2 239 .072

    a. Predictors: (Constant), Listng_delay, Demand

    b. Dependent Variable: Pricing

    S = 1.02872 R-Sq = 2.2% R-Sq(adj) = 1.4%

    As can be seen from tables above, the regression model developed is itself significant, as the

    probability of it being insignificant is 1.02, which is very close to zero. The R2 is 2.2%. The low

    value could be because of wide heterogeneity in the firms considered in the sample.

    The regression coefficients (orB coefficients) represent the independentcontributions of each

    independent variable to the prediction of the dependent variable.The result shows that there is an

    inverse relation in between delay in listing and the degree of pricing. If there is increase in 4%

    change in delay in listing it will lead to 1% increase in degree of pricing.

    Whereas relation between demand for the IPO and degree of pricing is direct i.e. if there is

    increase in demand for the IPO degree of under pricing will also increase.

    The regression equation clearly tells that listing delay has much more impact on degree of pricing

    of the issue as compared to demand for the IPO. Similarly it is clear from the model that listing

    delay has direct relation and impact on degree of pricing whereas demand is negatively relates to

    degree of pricing.

    46

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    47/80

    CHAPTER VI

    FINDINGS,

    CONCLUSION

    AND

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    47

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    48/80

    FINDINGS:

    First of all on applying regression model we came up with conclusion that degree of under pricing

    has a relation with demand of IPO and listing delay. So, on the basis of this we have found that

    null hypothesis (H0) is not accepted.

    Whereas alternate hypothesis which states that there is relation between degree of IPO pricing

    with demand for the IPO and delay in listing is accepted.

    By the regression equation we can see that under pricing is inversely proportional to listing delay

    or we can say that if listing delay (Time period in days from the last day of the offer to the day of

    listing) is increased then degree of under pricing will get decreased and vice-versa.

    On the other hand demand is directly proportional to the degree of under pricing by which we can

    say that if demand is increasing then the degree of under pricing will be increasing.

    CONCLUSION:

    The study demonstrates that most of the IPOs are underpriced i.e. IPOs experience high returns

    on the first trading day, indicating that these shares may have been priced at the time of their

    offering to the public at values much below their intrinsic value. If the firms shares are

    overvalued, their sale to the public will fail; if it succeeds, it will entail a transfer of wealth from

    the new shareholders to the old ones.

    Another important parameter driving the under pricing negatively is the listing delay. Also we

    have find that out of 243, only 134 companies are in gains from IPOs get diffused within 10 day

    of the listing of the firms.

    LIMITATION OF THE STUDY

    The main limitation of the study is inadequate data. The sources from where we collect data is

    limited, we just refined up to which is available on the net. The basic differences of our study

    from the others are they did face to face interaction for getting more information but in this we

    cant do.

    48

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    49/80

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    49

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    50/80

    CHAPTER VII

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    50

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    51/80

    http://www.whartonsp.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1188570

    www.springerlink.com/index/K5R386327856WP73.pdf

    http://www.wrhambrecht.com/about/media/20060531oa.pdf

    http://www.rediff.com/money/2006/may/31guest.htm

    http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=1401-

    338X&volume=13&issue=4&articleid=1823682&show=abstract

    http://www.calloptionputoption.com/past-option.htm

    http://www.squamble.com/2009/08/31/bse-ipo-index/

    http://www.chittorgarh.com/stock-ipo-allotment-status.asp

    http://dalalstreet.biz/uploaded_images/Historical-BSE-Sensex-1990-to-2008.PNG

    http://lastbull.com/listing-rules-for-new-companies-on-bse-ipo-rules/

    http://livebombaystockexchange.blogspot.com/2009/08/bombay-stock-exchange-

    launches-bse-ipo.html

    http://www.indiansharemarket.org/list-of-bse-30-stocks-with-script-code-that-makes-

    sensex/

    http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/ipos/fpos/rights-issues/BSE-IPO-Index-

    gains-241-pc-on-launch-day/articleshow/4929224.cms

    http://www.nseindia.com/

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/results.cfm

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=891757

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=729963

    Baron D P (1982), A Model of the Demand for investment Banking Advising and

    Distribution Services For New Issues, Journal of Finance, Vol. 37, No.4, pp.955-976

    51

    http://www.whartonsp.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1188570http://www.springerlink.com/index/K5R386327856WP73.pdfhttp://www.wrhambrecht.com/about/media/20060531oa.pdfhttp://www.rediff.com/money/2006/may/31guest.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=1401-338X&volume=13&issue=4&articleid=1823682&show=abstracthttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=1401-338X&volume=13&issue=4&articleid=1823682&show=abstracthttp://www.calloptionputoption.com/past-option.htmhttp://www.squamble.com/2009/08/31/bse-ipo-index/http://www.chittorgarh.com/stock-ipo-allotment-status.asphttp://dalalstreet.biz/uploaded_images/Historical-BSE-Sensex-1990-to-2008.PNGhttp://lastbull.com/listing-rules-for-new-companies-on-bse-ipo-rules/http://livebombaystockexchange.blogspot.com/2009/08/bombay-stock-exchange-launches-bse-ipo.htmlhttp://livebombaystockexchange.blogspot.com/2009/08/bombay-stock-exchange-launches-bse-ipo.htmlhttp://www.indiansharemarket.org/list-of-bse-30-stocks-with-script-code-that-makes-sensex/http://www.indiansharemarket.org/list-of-bse-30-stocks-with-script-code-that-makes-sensex/http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/ipos/fpos/rights-issues/BSE-IPO-Index-gains-241-pc-on-launch-day/articleshow/4929224.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/ipos/fpos/rights-issues/BSE-IPO-Index-gains-241-pc-on-launch-day/articleshow/4929224.cmshttp://www.nseindia.com/http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/results.cfmhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=891757http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=729963http://www.whartonsp.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1188570http://www.springerlink.com/index/K5R386327856WP73.pdfhttp://www.wrhambrecht.com/about/media/20060531oa.pdfhttp://www.rediff.com/money/2006/may/31guest.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=1401-338X&volume=13&issue=4&articleid=1823682&show=abstracthttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=1401-338X&volume=13&issue=4&articleid=1823682&show=abstracthttp://www.calloptionputoption.com/past-option.htmhttp://www.squamble.com/2009/08/31/bse-ipo-index/http://www.chittorgarh.com/stock-ipo-allotment-status.asphttp://dalalstreet.biz/uploaded_images/Historical-BSE-Sensex-1990-to-2008.PNGhttp://lastbull.com/listing-rules-for-new-companies-on-bse-ipo-rules/http://livebombaystockexchange.blogspot.com/2009/08/bombay-stock-exchange-launches-bse-ipo.htmlhttp://livebombaystockexchange.blogspot.com/2009/08/bombay-stock-exchange-launches-bse-ipo.htmlhttp://www.indiansharemarket.org/list-of-bse-30-stocks-with-script-code-that-makes-sensex/http://www.indiansharemarket.org/list-of-bse-30-stocks-with-script-code-that-makes-sensex/http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/ipos/fpos/rights-issues/BSE-IPO-Index-gains-241-pc-on-launch-day/articleshow/4929224.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/ipos/fpos/rights-issues/BSE-IPO-Index-gains-241-pc-on-launch-day/articleshow/4929224.cmshttp://www.nseindia.com/http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/results.cfmhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=891757http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=729963
  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    52/80

    Benveniste L M and Spindt P A (1989), how Investment Bankers Determine the offer

    price and allocation of new issues, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 24, No. 2, pp

    343-361

    http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/Murphy_IPOOptions.pdf

    http://www.cgu.edu/include/drucker/JFE%20Forthcoming.pdf

    http://efmaefm.org/0EFMSYMPOSIUM/Canada010/papers/Local

    %20OligopoliesNov09.pdf

    http://www.nhh.no/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2FFiles%2FFiler

    %2Finstitutter%2Ffor%2Fseminars%2Ffinance%2F2011_spring%2F240111.pdf

    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=73&ved=0CCEQFjACOEY&url=http

    %3A%2F%2Fwww.williams.edu%2FEconomics%2FHonors

    %2F2006%2FAlexBalThesisMay13th06.pdf&ei=izyfTeelO4qqrAfrjJXxAg&usg=AFQjC

    NEDLa1XuwL0mOIGSoiwIYiv5Udygg&sig2=OSYmb7BpcjmnhhA7Qea27g

    http://www.kier.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~osano/bachmann2005.pdf

    http://www.downloadit.org/free_files/Pages%20from%20Chapter%20746f546913ed8496015c3699848061768.pdf

    http://www.hausarbeiten.de/faecher/vorschau/76172.html

    http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-2648043/IPO-underpricing-a-meta-analysis.html

    http://bora.nhh.no/bitstream/2330/1690/1/Hesjedal%20Kristine%202007.pdf

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID263810_code010509110.pdf?

    abstractid=263810

    http://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/22748/1/gupea_2077_22748_1.pdf

    52

    http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/Murphy_IPOOptions.pdfhttp://www.cgu.edu/include/drucker/JFE%20Forthcoming.pdfhttp://efmaefm.org/0EFMSYMPOSIUM/Canada010/papers/Local%20OligopoliesNov09.pdfhttp://efmaefm.org/0EFMSYMPOSIUM/Canada010/papers/Local%20OligopoliesNov09.pdfhttp://www.nhh.no/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2FFiles%2FFiler%2Finstitutter%2Ffor%2Fseminars%2Ffinance%2F2011_spring%2F240111.pdfhttp://www.nhh.no/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2FFiles%2FFiler%2Finstitutter%2Ffor%2Fseminars%2Ffinance%2F2011_spring%2F240111.pdfhttp://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=73&ved=0CCEQFjACOEY&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.williams.edu%2FEconomics%2FHonors%2F2006%2FAlexBalThesisMay13th06.pdf&ei=izyfTeelO4qqrAfrjJXxAg&usg=AFQjCNEDLa1XuwL0mOIGSoiwIYiv5Udygg&sig2=OSYmb7BpcjmnhhA7Qea27ghttp://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=73&ved=0CCEQFjACOEY&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.williams.edu%2FEconomics%2FHonors%2F2006%2FAlexBalThesisMay13th06.pdf&ei=izyfTeelO4qqrAfrjJXxAg&usg=AFQjCNEDLa1XuwL0mOIGSoiwIYiv5Udygg&sig2=OSYmb7BpcjmnhhA7Qea27ghttp://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=73&ved=0CCEQFjACOEY&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.williams.edu%2FEconomics%2FHonors%2F2006%2FAlexBalThesisMay13th06.pdf&ei=izyfTeelO4qqrAfrjJXxAg&usg=AFQjCNEDLa1XuwL0mOIGSoiwIYiv5Udygg&sig2=OSYmb7BpcjmnhhA7Qea27ghttp://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=73&ved=0CCEQFjACOEY&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.williams.edu%2FEconomics%2FHonors%2F2006%2FAlexBalThesisMay13th06.pdf&ei=izyfTeelO4qqrAfrjJXxAg&usg=AFQjCNEDLa1XuwL0mOIGSoiwIYiv5Udygg&sig2=OSYmb7BpcjmnhhA7Qea27ghttp://www.kier.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~osano/bachmann2005.pdfhttp://www.downloadit.org/free_files/Pages%20from%20Chapter%20746f546913ed8496015c3699848061768.pdfhttp://www.downloadit.org/free_files/Pages%20from%20Chapter%20746f546913ed8496015c3699848061768.pdfhttp://www.hausarbeiten.de/faecher/vorschau/76172.htmlhttp://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-2648043/IPO-underpricing-a-meta-analysis.htmlhttp://bora.nhh.no/bitstream/2330/1690/1/Hesjedal%20Kristine%202007.pdfhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID263810_code010509110.pdf?abstractid=263810http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID263810_code010509110.pdf?abstractid=263810http://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/22748/1/gupea_2077_22748_1.pdfhttp://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/Murphy_IPOOptions.pdfhttp://www.cgu.edu/include/drucker/JFE%20Forthcoming.pdfhttp://efmaefm.org/0EFMSYMPOSIUM/Canada010/papers/Local%20OligopoliesNov09.pdfhttp://efmaefm.org/0EFMSYMPOSIUM/Canada010/papers/Local%20OligopoliesNov09.pdfhttp://www.nhh.no/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2FFiles%2FFiler%2Finstitutter%2Ffor%2Fseminars%2Ffinance%2F2011_spring%2F240111.pdfhttp://www.nhh.no/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2FFiles%2FFiler%2Finstitutter%2Ffor%2Fseminars%2Ffinance%2F2011_spring%2F240111.pdfhttp://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=73&ved=0CCEQFjACOEY&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.williams.edu%2FEconomics%2FHonors%2F2006%2FAlexBalThesisMay13th06.pdf&ei=izyfTeelO4qqrAfrjJXxAg&usg=AFQjCNEDLa1XuwL0mOIGSoiwIYiv5Udygg&sig2=OSYmb7BpcjmnhhA7Qea27ghttp://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=73&ved=0CCEQFjACOEY&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.williams.edu%2FEconomics%2FHonors%2F2006%2FAlexBalThesisMay13th06.pdf&ei=izyfTeelO4qqrAfrjJXxAg&usg=AFQjCNEDLa1XuwL0mOIGSoiwIYiv5Udygg&sig2=OSYmb7BpcjmnhhA7Qea27ghttp://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=73&ved=0CCEQFjACOEY&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.williams.edu%2FEconomics%2FHonors%2F2006%2FAlexBalThesisMay13th06.pdf&ei=izyfTeelO4qqrAfrjJXxAg&usg=AFQjCNEDLa1XuwL0mOIGSoiwIYiv5Udygg&sig2=OSYmb7BpcjmnhhA7Qea27ghttp://www.kier.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~osano/bachmann2005.pdfhttp://www.downloadit.org/free_files/Pages%20from%20Chapter%20746f546913ed8496015c3699848061768.pdfhttp://www.downloadit.org/free_files/Pages%20from%20Chapter%20746f546913ed8496015c3699848061768.pdfhttp://www.hausarbeiten.de/faecher/vorschau/76172.htmlhttp://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-2648043/IPO-underpricing-a-meta-analysis.htmlhttp://bora.nhh.no/bitstream/2330/1690/1/Hesjedal%20Kristine%202007.pdfhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID263810_code010509110.pdf?abstractid=263810http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID263810_code010509110.pdf?abstractid=263810http://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/22748/1/gupea_2077_22748_1.pdf
  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    53/80

    CHAPTER VIII

    APPENDIX

    Company Name Price Range Issue

    Price

    (Rs.)

    Date Of

    Listing

    First

    Day

    Price

    10th

    Day

    Price

    Return

    For Day

    1

    Return

    For Day

    10

    Return For

    Day 1-10

    Lis

    De

    B. CORP LIMITED Rs. 185 - Rs. 212 6-Jan-10 265.9 255.1 25.42% 20.33% -4.06% 2

    53

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    54/80

    212

    GODREJ

    PROPERTIES

    LIMITED

    Rs. 490 - Rs.

    530

    490 5-Jan-10 537.2

    5

    510.3 9.64% 4.14% -5.02% 2

    JSW ENERGY

    LIMITED

    Rs. 100 - Rs.

    115

    100 4-Jan-10 100.8

    5

    117.2 0.85% 17.20% 16.21% 2

    MBL

    FRASTRUCTURES

    LIMITED

    Rs. 165 - Rs.

    180

    180 11-Jan-

    10

    206.5

    5

    233.5 14.75% 29.72% 13.05% 4

    COX AND KINGS

    NDIA) LIMITED

    Rs. 316 - Rs.

    330

    330 11-Dec-

    09

    425.4 438.3 28.91% 32.82% 3.03% 2

    ADANI POWER

    LIMITED

    Rs 90 - Rs

    100

    100 20-Aug-

    09

    100.1 101.45 0.10% 1.45% 1.35% 2

    RAJ OIL MILLS

    LIMITED

    Rs 100 - Rs

    120

    120 12-Aug-

    09

    119.2

    5

    87.5 -0.63% -27.08% -26.62% 2

    XCEL INFOWAYS

    LIMITED

    Rs 80 - Rs

    85

    85 3-Aug-

    09

    95.85 103.15 12.76% 21.35% 7.62% 1

    AHINDRA H & R

    INDIA LIMITED

    Rs 275 - Rs

    325

    300 16-Jul-

    09

    317.4

    5

    366.8 5.82% 22.27% 15.55% 2

    EDSERV

    SOFTSYSTEM

    LIMITED

    Rs 55 - Rs

    60

    60 2-Mar-

    09

    137.7 34.15 129.50

    %

    -43.08% -75.20% 2

    PIPAVAV

    IPYARD LIMITED

    Rs 55 - Rs

    60

    58 9-Oct-09 160.0

    5

    163.55 175.95

    %

    181.98

    %

    2.19% 2

    L INDIA LIMITED Rs 950 - Rs

    1050

    1050 30-Sep-

    09

    1141.

    2

    1184.5

    5

    8.69% 12.81% 3.80% 2

    GLOBUS SPIRITS

    LIMITED

    Rs 90 - Rs

    100

    100 23-Sep-

    09

    91 83.45 -9.00% -16.55% -8.30% 2

    JINDAL COTEX

    LIMITED

    Rs 70 - Rs

    75

    75 22-Sep-

    09

    87.3 86 16.40% 14.67% -1.49% 2

    NHPC Rs 30 - Rs 36 1-Sep-09 36.75 33.95 2.08% -5.69% -7.62% 2

    54

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    55/80

    36

    ASTEC

    LIFESCIENCES

    LIMITED

    Rs.77 To

    Rs.82

    82 25-Nov-

    09

    84 87.85 2.44% 7.13% 4.58% 2

    DEN NETWORKS

    LIMITED

    Rs. 195 To

    Rs. 205.

    195 24-Nov-

    09

    163.4 173.95 -16.21% -10.79% 6.46% 1

    INDIABULLS

    OWER LIMITED

    Rs.40 To

    Rs.45

    45 30-Oct-

    09

    39.5 34.1 -12.22% -24.22% -13.67% 2

    THINKSOFT

    LOBAL SERVICES

    LIMITED

    Rs.115 To

    Rs.125

    125 26-Oct-

    09

    164.4 215.55 31.52% 72.44% 31.11% 2

    Issues

    Of

    2008

    Company Name Price Range Issue

    Price

    (Rs.)

    Date Of

    Listing

    First

    Day

    Price

    10th

    Day

    Price

    Return

    For Day

    1

    Return

    For Day

    10

    Return For

    Day 1-10

    Lis

    De

    ALKALI METALS

    LIMITED

    Rs 86 TO Rs

    103

    103 6-Nov-

    08

    173.4 185.8 68.35% 80.39% 7.15% 2

    20 MICRONS

    LIMITED

    Rs 50 TO Rs

    55

    55 6-Oct-08 33.65 21.75 -38.82% -60.45% -35.36% 2

    SURGERE MINES

    MINERALS INDIA

    LIMITED

    Rs 263 to Rs

    272

    270 1-Sep-08 533.5

    5

    199.2 97.61% -26.22% -62.67% 1

    USTRAL COKE &

    OJECTS LIMITED

    Rs 164 TO

    Rs 196

    196 4-Sep-08 225.9

    5

    267.65 15.28% 36.56% 18.46% 2

    NU TEK INDIA

    LIMITED

    Rs 170 to Rs

    192

    192 27-Aug-

    08

    199.1

    5

    171.65 3.72% -10.60% -13.81% 2

    VISHAL

    INFORMATION

    TECHNOLOGIES

    Rs 140 to

    Rs150

    150 11-Aug-

    08

    194.6 294.1 29.73% 96.07% 51.13% 1

    55

    http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=5&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=5&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=5&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=6&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=6&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=7&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=7&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=8&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=8&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=8&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=5&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=5&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=5&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=6&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=6&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=7&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=7&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=8&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=8&yr=2009http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/ipo/ipo_gen_registrar_info.jsp?id=8&yr=2009
  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    56/80

    LIMITED

    BIRLA COTSYN

    INDIA LIMITED

    RS.12 TO

    RS.14

    14 30-Jul-

    08

    9.45 10.65 -32.50% -23.93% 12.70% 2

    KSK ENERGY

    VENTURES

    LIMITED

    RS.240 TO

    RS.255

    240 14-Jul-

    08

    191.7

    5

    185.9 -20.10% -22.54% -3.05% 1

    OTUS EYE CARE

    OSPITAL LIMITED

    Rs 36 to Rs

    38

    38 11-Jul-

    08

    35.65 39 -6.18% 2.63% 9.40% 2

    FIRST WINNER

    INDUSTRIES

    LIMITED

    Rs 115 to Rs

    125

    125 8-Jul-08 89.2 125.3 -28.64% 0.24% 40.47% 2

    ARCHIDPLY

    INDUSTRIES

    LIMITED

    Rs 70 to Rs

    80

    74 4-Jul-08 50.7 38.2 -31.49% -48.38% -24.65% 1

    SEJAL

    RCHITECTURAL

    GLASS LIMITED

    Rs 105 to Rs

    115

    115 1-Jul-08 81.25 59.05 -29.35% -48.65% -27.32% 1

    GOKUL REFOILS

    AND SOLVENT

    LIMITED

    Rs 175 to Rs

    195

    195 4-Jun-08 182.0

    5

    232.7 -6.64% 19.33% 27.82% 2

    KIRI DYES AND

    CHEMICALS

    LIMITED

    Rs 125 to Rs

    150

    150 22-Apr-

    08

    158.9

    5

    168.7 5.97% 12.47% 6.13% 2

    TITAGARHAGONS LIMITED

    Rs 540 to Rs610

    540 21-Apr-08

    706.85

    844.6 30.90% 56.41% 19.49% 2

    Sita Shree Food

    Products Limited

    Rs 27 to Rs

    30

    30 7-Apr-08 43.7 59 45.67% 96.67% 35.01% 2

    GAMMON

    FRASTRUCTURE

    OJECTS LIMITED

    Rs 167 to Rs

    200

    167 3-Apr-08 158.1

    5

    163.5 -5.30% -2.10% 3.38% 2

    RURAL Rs 90 to Rs 105 12-Mar- 121.3 110.2 15.52% 4.95% -9.15% 1

    56

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    57/80

    LECTRIFICATION

    CORPORATION

    LIMITED

    105 08

    V-GUARD

    INDUSTRIES

    LIMITED

    Rs 80 to Rs

    85

    82 13-Mar-

    08

    75.95 66.2 -7.38% -19.27% -12.84% 2

    GSS AMERICA

    FOTECH LIMITED

    Rs.400 to

    Rs.440

    400 7-Mar-

    08

    500.8 655.25 25.20% 63.81% 30.84% 2

    Tulsi Extrusions

    Limited

    Rs.80 to

    Rs.85

    85 25-Feb-

    08

    140.8

    5

    72.55 65.71% -14.65% -48.49% 2

    RB Infrastructure

    evelopers Limited

    Rs.185 to

    Rs.220

    185 25-Feb-

    08

    189.6

    5

    191.75 2.51% 3.65% 1.11% 2

    SHRIRAM EPC

    LIMITED

    Rs.290 to

    Rs.330

    300 20-Feb-

    08

    286.5 255.2 -4.50% -14.93% -10.92% 2

    Bang Overseas

    Limited

    Rs.200 to

    Rs.207

    207 20-Feb-

    08

    174.1 123.25 -15.89% -40.46% -29.21% 2

    ONMOBILE

    LOBAL LIMITED

    Rs.425 to

    Rs.450

    440 19-Feb-

    08

    518.1

    5

    566.95 17.76% 28.85% 9.42% 2

    KNR Construction

    Limited

    Rs.170 to

    Rs.180

    170 18-Feb-

    08

    154.9 145.95 -8.88% -14.15% -5.78% 2

    CORDS CABLE

    INDUSTRIES

    LIMITED

    Rs.125 to

    Rs.135

    135 13-Feb-

    08

    139.4

    5

    132.35 3.30% -1.96% -5.09% 2

    Kumar Infraprojects

    Limited

    Rs.110 to

    Rs.120

    110 12-Feb-

    08

    103.3

    5

    100.45 -6.05% -8.68% -2.81% 2

    ELIANCE POWER

    LIMITED

    Rs.405 to

    Rs.450

    450 11-Feb-

    08

    372.3 417.15 -17.27% -7.30% 12.05% 2

    UTURE CAPITAL

    HOLDINGS

    LIMITED

    Rs.700 to

    Rs.765

    765 1-Feb-08 909.8 834.9 18.93% 9.14% -8.23% 1

    57

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    58/80

    Issues Of 2007

    Company

    Name

    Price

    Rang

    e

    Iss

    ue

    Pri

    ce

    (Rs

    .)

    Date

    Of

    Listi

    ng

    First

    Day

    Price

    10th

    Day

    Price

    Retur

    n For

    Day 1

    Retur

    n For

    Day

    10

    Retur

    n For

    Day 1-

    10

    Listi

    ng

    Dela

    y

    Dema

    nd

    Precision Pipes

    and Profiles

    Company

    Limited

    Rs.14

    0 to

    Rs.15

    0

    150 11-

    Jan-

    08

    136.1 90.8 -

    9.27%

    -

    39.47

    %

    -

    33.28

    %

    22 high

    MANAKSIA

    LIMITED

    Rs.

    140

    to Rs.

    160

    160 8-

    Jan-

    08

    167.7 133.5 4.81% -

    16.56

    %

    -

    20.39

    %

    20 high

    ARIES AGRO

    LIMITED

    Rs.

    120

    to Rs.

    130

    130 11-

    Jan-

    08

    251.4 175.8 93.38

    %

    35.23

    %

    -

    30.07

    %

    23 high

    BRIGADE

    ENTERPRISE

    S LIMITED

    Rs.

    351

    to Rs.

    390

    390 31-

    Dec-

    07

    379.9 364.0

    3

    -

    2.59%

    -

    6.66%

    -4.18% 18 high

    Transformers

    And Rectifiers

    (India) Limited

    Rs.

    425

    to Rs.

    465

    465 28-

    Dec-

    07

    729.2

    5

    760.5 56.83

    %

    63.55

    %

    4.29% 16 high

    BGR ENERGY

    SYSTEMS

    LIMITED

    Rs.

    425

    to Rs.

    480

    480 3-

    Jan-

    08

    901.4

    5

    737.9

    5

    87.80

    %

    53.74

    %

    -

    18.14

    %

    22 high

    ECLERX Rs. 315 31- 449.6 353.5 42.75 12.24 - 24 high

    58

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    59/80

    SERVICES

    LIMITED

    270

    to Rs.

    315

    Dec-

    07

    5 5 % % 21.37

    %

    JYOTHY

    LABORATORI

    ES LIMITED

    Rs.62

    0 to

    Rs.69

    0

    690 19-

    Dec-

    07

    794.0

    5

    861.1

    5

    15.08

    %

    24.80

    %

    8.45% 22 high

    KAUSHALYA

    INFRASTRUC

    TURE

    DEVELOPME

    NT

    CORPORATIO

    N LIMITED

    Rs.50

    to

    Rs.60

    60 14-

    Dec-

    07

    82.45 95.6 37.42

    %

    59.33

    %

    15.95

    %

    21 high

    RENAISSANC

    E

    JEWELLERY

    LIMITED

    Rs.12

    5 to

    Rs.15

    0

    150 12-

    Dec-

    07

    245.5 34.45 63.67

    %

    -

    77.03

    %

    -

    85.97

    %

    21 high

    EDELWEISS

    CAPITAL

    LIMITED

    Rs

    725

    to Rs

    825

    825 12-

    Dec-

    07

    1510.

    25

    1416.

    65

    83.06

    %

    71.72

    %

    -6.20% 22 high

    Mundra Port

    and Special

    Economic Zone

    Limited

    Rs.

    400

    to

    Rs.44

    0

    440 27-

    Nov-

    07

    962.9 1075.

    4

    118.8

    4%

    144.4

    1%

    11.68

    %

    20 high

    EMPEE

    DISTILLERIE

    S LIMITED

    Rs.

    350

    toRs.40

    0

    400 26-

    Nov-

    07

    319.3

    5

    307.9 -

    20.16

    %

    -

    23.03

    %

    -3.59% 20 high

    Religare

    Enterprises

    Limited

    Rs.

    160

    to

    Rs.18

    5

    185 21-

    Nov-

    07

    525.3 508.0

    5

    183.9

    5%

    174.6

    2%

    -3.28% 20 high

    BARAK

    VALLEY

    Rs.

    37 to

    42 23-

    Nov-

    55.3 51 31.67

    %

    21.43

    %

    -7.78% 22 high

    59

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    60/80

    CEMENTS

    LIMITED

    Rs.42 07

    Supreme

    Infrastructure

    India Limited

    Rs.

    95 to

    Rs.10

    8

    108 18-

    Oct-

    07

    175.1 141.2 62.13

    %

    30.74

    %

    -

    19.36

    %

    22 high

    Koutons Retail

    India Limited

    Rs.

    370

    to Rs.

    415

    415 12-

    Oct-

    07

    586.5 693.8

    5

    41.33

    %

    67.19

    %

    18.30

    %

    21 high

    Consolidated

    Construction

    ConsortiumLimited

    Rs.

    460

    to Rs.510

    510 15-

    Oct-

    07

    792.1 806.4

    5

    55.31

    %

    58.13

    %

    1.81% 24 high

    Kaveri Seed

    Company

    Limited

    Rs.

    150

    to Rs.

    170

    170 4-

    Oct-

    07

    230.9

    5

    194.9 35.85

    %

    14.65

    %

    -

    15.61

    %

    23 high

    Dhanus

    Technologies

    Limited

    Rs.

    280

    toRs.29

    5

    295 17-

    Oct-

    07

    309.7

    5

    312.1 5.00% 5.80% 0.76% 35 high

    Motilal Oswal

    Financial

    Services

    Limited

    Rs.

    725

    to Rs.

    825

    825 11-

    Sep-

    07

    976.8

    5

    1063.

    3

    18.41

    %

    28.88

    %

    8.85% 19 high

    Indowind

    Energy Limited

    Rs.

    55 to

    Rs.

    65

    65 14-

    Sep-

    07

    113.6

    5

    112.8 74.85

    %

    73.54

    %

    -0.75% 21 high

    Magnum

    Ventures

    Limited

    Rs.

    27 to

    Rs.

    30

    30 20-

    Sep-

    07

    49.4 31.5 64.67

    %

    5.00% -

    36.23

    %

    21 high

    60

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    61/80

    SEL

    Manufacturing

    Company

    Limited

    Rs.

    80 to

    Rs.

    90

    90 21-

    Aug-

    07

    144.7

    5

    167.8 60.83

    %

    86.44

    %

    15.92

    %

    21 high

    Asian Granito

    India Limited

    Rs.

    85 to

    Rs.

    102

    97 23-

    Aug-

    07

    94.2 108.9 -

    2.89%

    12.27

    %

    15.61

    %

    23 high

    TAKE

    Solutions

    Limited

    Rs.

    675

    to Rs.

    730

    730 27-

    Aug-

    07

    927.8 991.5

    5

    27.10

    %

    35.83

    %

    6.87% 20 high

    Central Bank ofIndia

    Rs.85 to

    Rs.

    102

    102 21-Aug-

    07

    115.3 134.45

    13.04%

    31.81%

    16.61%

    34 high

    Omnitech

    Infosolutions

    Limited

    Rs.90

    to

    Rs.10

    5

    105 14-

    Aug-

    07

    163.4 126.5

    5

    55.62

    %

    20.52

    %

    -

    22.55

    %

    20 high

    Zylog SystemsLimited Rs.330 to

    Rs.35

    0

    350 17-Aug-

    07

    427.5 430.5 22.14% 23.00% 0.70% 23 high

    Omaxe Limited Rs.26

    5 to

    Rs.31

    0

    310 9-

    Aug-

    07

    349.3

    5

    299.2 12.69

    %

    -

    3.48%

    -

    14.36

    %

    20 high

    Alpa

    Laboratories

    Limited

    Rs.62

    to

    Rs.68

    68 6-

    Aug-

    07

    55.15 49.35 -

    18.90

    %

    -

    27.43

    %

    -

    10.52

    %

    20 high

    Simplex

    Projects

    Limited

    Rs.17

    0 to

    Rs.18

    5

    185 3-

    Aug-

    07

    273.7 261.0

    5

    47.95

    %

    41.11

    %

    -4.62% 21 high

    Allied Digital

    Services

    Limited

    Rs.17

    0 to

    Rs.19

    190 25-

    Jul-

    07

    330.1

    5

    318.4

    5

    73.76

    %

    67.61

    %

    -3.54% 21 high

    61

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    62/80

    0

    Bharat Earth

    Movers

    Limited

    Rs.10

    20 to

    Rs.10

    90

    107

    5

    5-

    Nov-

    03

    1233.

    3

    1199.

    5

    14.73

    %

    11.58

    %

    -2.74% 20 high

    Housing

    Development

    and

    Infrastructure

    Limited

    Rs.43

    0 to

    Rs.50

    0

    500 24-

    Jul-

    07

    559.3

    5

    499.6

    5

    11.87

    %

    -

    0.07%

    -

    10.67

    %

    21 high

    Roman Tarmat

    Limited

    Rs.15

    0 to

    Rs.175

    175 9-

    Jul-

    07

    319.2 290.4

    5

    82.40

    %

    65.97

    %

    -9.01% 20 high

    DLF Limited Rs.50

    0 to

    Rs.55

    0

    525 5-

    Jul-

    07

    569.8 643.4 8.53% 22.55

    %

    12.92

    %

    21 low

    Vishal Retail

    Limited

    Rs.23

    0 to

    Rs.270

    270 4-

    Jul-

    07

    753.1 714.6 178.9

    3%

    164.6

    7%

    -5.11% 22 high

    Nelcast Limited Rs.19

    5 to

    Rs.21

    9

    219 27-

    Jun-

    07

    207.3

    5

    178.1

    5

    -

    5.32%

    -

    18.65

    %

    -

    14.08

    %

    19 high

    Meghmani

    Organics

    Limited

    Rs.17

    to

    Rs.19

    19 28-

    Jun-

    07

    26.6 25.75 40.00

    %

    35.53

    %

    -3.20% 21 high

    Decolight

    Ceramics

    Limited

    Rs.45

    to

    Rs.54

    54 19-

    Jun-

    07

    44.65 38.25 -

    17.31

    %

    -

    29.17

    %

    -

    14.33

    %

    21 high

    Time

    Technoplast

    Limited

    Rs.29

    0 to

    Rs.31

    5

    315 13-

    Jun-

    07

    480.9 618.9 52.67

    %

    96.48

    %

    28.70

    %

    21 high

    Nitin Fire

    Protection

    Rs.17

    1 to

    190 5-

    Jun-

    484.8

    5

    382.6

    5

    155.1

    8%

    101.3

    9%

    -

    21.08

    18 high

    62

  • 8/6/2019 Capstone Final 2011 Apr (1)

    63/80

    Industries

    Limited

    Rs.19

    0

    07 %

    Insecticides

    (India) Limited

    Rs.97

    to

    Rs.11

    5

    115 30-

    May-

    07

    109.4

    5

    87.35 -

    4.83%

    -

    24.04

    %

    -

    20.19

    %

    19 high

    Binani Cement

    Limited

    Rs.

    75 to

    Rs.

    85

    75 28-

    May-

    07

    69.05 63.85 -

    7.93%

    -

    14.87

    %

    -7.53% 18 low

    MIC

    Electronics

    Limited

    Rs.

    129

    to Rs.150

    150 30-

    May-

    07

    338.1

    5

    331.0

    5

    125.4

    3%

    120.7

    0%

    -2.10% 22 high

    Fortis

    Healthcare

    Limited

    Rs.

    92 to

    Rs.

    110

    108 9-

    May-

    07

    100.1

    5

    92.3 -

    7.27%

    -

    14.54

    %

    -7.84% 19 high

    Advanta India

    Limited

    Rs.

    600

    to Rs.650

    640 19-

    Apr-

    07

    845.5 703.4

    5

    32.11

    %

    9.91% -

    16.80

    %

    20 high

    ICRA Limited Rs.

    275

    to Rs.

    330

    330 13-

    Apr-

    07

    803.2

    5

    866.2 143.4

    1%

    162.4

    8%

    7.84% 21 high

    Orbit

    Corporation

    Limited

    Rs.

    108

    to Rs.

    117

    110 12-

    Apr-

    07

    9.25 155.8 -

    91.59

    %

    41.64

    %

    1584.3

    2%

    20 low

    Abhishek Mills

    Limited

    Rs.

    90 to

    Rs.

    100

    100 19-

    Mar-

    07

    91.25 56.4


Recommended