+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

Date post: 06-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: dior
View: 25 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research. Climate Change of the Near Surface Wind Sped over Europe and North Atlantic in the IPCC A2 scenario. Kay Su šelj, Detlev Heinemann, Abha Sood. Outlook. Motivation Methodology Results – climate change of WS: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
11
16 – 19 March 2009 Climate Change of the Near Surface Wind Sped over Europe and North Atlantic in the IPCC A2 scenario Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research Kay Sušelj, Detlev Heinemann, Abha Sood
Transcript
Page 1: Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

16 – 19 March 2009

Climate Change of the Near Surface Wind Sped over Europe and North Atlantic in the IPCC A2

scenario

Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

Kay Sušelj, Detlev Heinemann, Abha Sood

Page 2: Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

K. Sušelj et al / page 2

Outlook

Motivation Methodology Results – climate change of WS:

Winter Summer

Outlook and conclusions

Page 3: Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

K. Sušelj et al / page 3

Motivation

Importance of Wind Speed (WS) climate change for wind energy High sensitivity of wind power on WS

Inconsistent results of climate change of WS over Europe in recent literature (e.g. Räisänen et al., 2004; Pryor et al., 2005,2006)

Last IPCC report: Confidence in predicting future change of WS over Europe is low

Page 4: Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

K. Sušelj et al / page 4

Methodology

Statistically estimate climate change of WS over Europe and North Atlantic based on forcing parameter, i.e. Sea Level Pressure (SLP)1) Find WS patterns optimized in explaining WS trend

(past data) – Trend Empirical Orthogonal Functions2) Statistically relate the WS patterns to SLP patterns

(past data)3) Investigate change of SLP patterns in future climate4)Estimate climate change of WS

SLP from ensemble of Global Circulation Models (GCMs) - estimation of the confidence of WS change

GCM simulation based on SRES IPCC A2 scenario

Page 5: Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

K. Sušelj et al / page 5

Assumptions:

WS well defined by the large scale SLP forcing Statistical relationship between SLP and WS patterns

describes physical coupling WS patterns from past climate remain significant in

future climate Seasonally dependent WS patterns and relationship

to SLP – independent analysis for four seasons of the year

Page 6: Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

K. Sušelj et al / page 6

Trend WS pattern and related SLP patterns – Winter (Dec.-Feb.)

Sea Level Pressure Time Series

WS – red; SLP - green

Page 7: Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

K. Sušelj et al / page 7

Wind Speed change in Winter (Dec.-Feb.)

SLP data from the GCM results used for 4th IPCC report

17 GCMs with 1-5 runs

Estimation of reliability of results

Page 8: Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

K. Sušelj et al / page 8

Wind speed change in Winter (Dec.-Feb.)

90th percentile 10th percentileGCM mean

Page 9: Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

K. Sušelj et al / page 9

Similar WS and SLP patterns, moved towards North to Northwest

Lower WS trend in past climate SLP and WS relationship less clear Contribution of local WS forcing more important

Wind speed change in other seasons compared to Winter

Page 10: Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

K. Sušelj et al / page 10

Change of WS in Summer (Jun.-Aug.)

GCM mean 90th percentile 10th percentile

10m Wind Speed

Page 11: Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, ForWind – Centre for Wind Energy Research

K. Sušelj et al / page 11

Conclusions

Clear signal increase of WS over the North Atlantic and North Europe in Winter

The climate change of WS is small and not significant in other seasons

Analysis restricted to IPCC A2 scenario Only the GCM resolved (synoptic scale) forcing The GCMs cannot well represent the past variability of

the SLP patterns Further downscaling of wind can be done based on

the selected GCMs


Recommended