Date post: | 31-Mar-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | hoangkhanh |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
1
Carol Westby, PhD
Bilingual and Multicultural Services
Albuquerque, NM
Infer! Infer!
Filling what's not in the book!
The Inference Song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_ZNP5aj5fs
Email for final more complete file
Obanya, P. (2003). Towards a Reading Society.
Read Across & Beyond the Lines
Read Between the Lines
(understanding inferred meaning)
Read Along the Lines
(decoding and understanding literal meanings)
Comprehension Requires That
Readers build a mental model or
representation of the situation or world
(real or imaginary) described in the text.
Perfetti, C., (1997). Sentences, individual differences, andmultiple texts: Three issues in text comprehension. DiscourseProcesses, 23, 337-355.
Textbase Model
Text Microstructure
Words
Sentences
Cohesive structures
Text Macrostructure
Text organization
Gist or theme
Situation/Scenario Mapping Model
Comprehensive referential meaning
of the real or imaginary situation
described in the text.
Knowledge, experiences,
propositions from
long-term memory
Mental Modeling
for Texts
NAEP Grade 4 Questions for
Hungry Spider and Turtle
• When turtle remains quiet about his mistreatment by Spider, the author wants you to:
– believe turtle is afraid
– have sympathy for turtle
– feel dislike for turtle
– think turtle deserved no dinner
• Spider’s behavior during the first part of the story is most like that of:
– mothers protecting their children
– thieves robbing banks
– runners losing races
– people not sharing their wealth
Oakhill, J. & Yuill, N. (1996). Higher order factors in comprehension
disability: Processes and remediation. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.),
Reading comprehension difficulties:Processes and intervention. (pp. 69-
92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
REASONS FOR INFERENCING DIFFICULTIES
• Lack of general knowledge
• Have difficulty accessing relevant background
knowledge and integrating it with what is in the text
• Less skilled at synthesizing information from different
parts of text and making relevant inferences
• May not realize tht inferences are necessary
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
2
Why do students with LI tolerate ambiguity in texts?
They are less aware:
• That a text should make sense to them
• That they should be monitoring their understanding
for potential inconsistencies
• About strategies to adopt when beginning with a
text
• About strategies to adopt when an inconsistency
occurs
• About the information that is relevant to the drawing
of inferences
Name Example Explanation
Coherence
or
intersentence
or text-
connecting
Peter begged his
mother to let him
go to the party.
Maintains textual
integrity. Reader must
realize that pronouns
“his” and “him refer to
Peter to understand the
sentence.
Classification of Inferences:
How they make text coherent
Name Example Explanation
Elaborative
or gap-filling
or
knowledge-
based
Kathy dropped the
vase. She ran for
the dustpan and
brush to sweep up
the pieces.
Enriches mental
representation of text.
Drawing on life
experiences and
general knowledge,
reader has to realize
that the vase broke to
supply the connection
between the sentences.
Classification of Inferences:
How they make text coherentName Example Explanation
Local
1. Coherence
inferences
2. Antecedent
causal
inferences
Peter begged his mother to
let him go to the party.
She tried to flag down the
car, but the driver of the car
seemed oblivious to her.
He rushed off, leaving his
bike unchained.
Creates a coherent representation
at the local level of sentences and
paragraphs
Reader must realize that pronouns
“his” and “him refer to Peter
Reader must recognize that
“vehicle” refers to “car”
The reader would infer that Dan
was in a hurry and left his bicycle
vulnerable to theft.
Classification of Inferences:
How they make text coherent
Name Example Explanation
Global Inferences about the theme,
main point, or moral of a
text.
To create a coherent representation of the
whole text, the reader would infer over-
arching ideas by drawing on local pieces
of information.
Classification of Inferences:
How they make text coherent Logical Inferences
Deductive
All mammals are warm-
blooded and have fur. A
tapir is a mammal. Is a tapir
warm-blooded? Does it
have fur?
Inductive
This animal is warm-blooded.
It has fur. It feeds its young
milk. I think it is a mammal.
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
3
Deductive Inferences
• Demigods are children who have one human parent
and one parent who is a Greek or Roman god. Percy’s
father is Neptune, the Greek god of the sea. His
mother is a human who works in New York. Percy is a
demigod.
• Percy is the son of Neptune, god of the sea. If he is
the son of the god of the sea, then he should be very
comfortable in the water, be able to hold his breath
under water for a long time, or breathe under water.
He won’t drown when the ship blows up.
Inductive Inferences
Who is Jason’s Father?
• First off, he survived a lightning strike; Zeus is the god of
lightning. I'll admit, that's a big chunk of fresh evidence!
People also think that because Zeus ruled the sky and
Jason can fly, that it means Jason has to belong to him. But
I don't remember any of Zeus‘ children having the power of
flight. Some believe that since Jason appears to be a main
character that he has to be a son of one of the Big Three.
Inductive InferencesWho is Jason’s Father?
• Aeolus is the God presiding over and keeping the winds. Well it
would explain Jason's ability to fly and his connection to the Anemoi
Thuellai (Venti in Roman). I think, though, that there is a better
choice.
• Boreus is the North Wind. This one is the most plausible to me.
Why, you ask? Well, first off in the myth "Jason and the Argonauts",
the title character ("our" Jason's namesake) lost his shoe. Remind
you of anything? Second off, there were some characters in that
myth that could fly. Guess who their daddy is? My last bit of
evidence: Being a child of the North Wind would definitely explain
why he knew who the Anemoi Thuellai were.
Classes of Inferences
• Anaphoric references: pronoun/noun-phrase that refers to previous text entity
• Bridging/relational: semantically or conceptually relating sentence to previous content
• Explanation-based/causal: explain what is read by a causal chain or network of previous events and states
• The warden scratched Mr. Sir. She
was furious with him.
• Making the connection between the
eating onions and not being bitten
by lizards
• Stanley befriending Zero, carrying
him up the mountain and saving his
life breaks the curse of Madam
Zaroni and brings the family good
luck. Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Rand Corporation.
Classes of Inferences
• Predictive: forecast what events will unfold
• Goal: infer intentions of agent
• Elaborative: properties and associations that cannot be explained by causal relationships
• Stanley will find Zero in the desert and they will run away from camp.
• The Warden is running the camp so she’ll have help finding a treasure.
• The Warden’s nail polish has rattlesnake venom in it. So when she scratches Mr. Sir, you must realize that the scratch will be more painful and harmful than an ordinary scratch
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding:
Toward an R & D program in reading
comprehension. Rand Corporation.
Intrapersonal
Reflect on one’s
own emotions
Regulate one’s
own emotions
and motivation
Interpersonal
Recognize
emotions of others
Infer emotions of
others
Infer behavior
based on emotions
Empathize with
others
Theory of Mind
Cognitive Affective
Interpersonal
Understand that
others can have
thoughts, beliefs,
desires different
than my own
Infer mental states
of others
Infer behavior
based on thoughts
Intrapersonal
Reflect on one’s own
mental states
Plan one’s behavior
Intrapersonal
Reflect on one’s
own mental states
Use metacognitive
learning strategies;
monitor
comprehension
Plan one’s
behavior
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
4
Gap-filling Inferences
• Theory of mind – prospective taking
• Bringing in past personal experiences
• Linking to other texts
Early Studies of LI and Inferencing
• On both verbal and visually presented stories,
children with language impairments make fewer
total inferences and more inference errors than
typically developing children
•Bishop, D.V.M., & Adams, C. (1992). Comprehension problems in children with specific
language impairment: Literal and inferential meaning. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,
35, 119-129.
•Crais, E., & Chapman, R. (1987). Story recall and inferencing skills in language/learning-
disabled and nondisabled children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 50-55.
•Ellis Weismer, S. (1985). Constructive comprehension abilities exhibited by language-
disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 175-184.
% Errors on Literal and Inferential Questions
by students with Reading Comprehension Deficits
Unseen Seen
Literal Inferential Literal Inferential
Less skilled
29.2 45.8 3.6 35.4
Skilled 10.9 15.6 1.0 9.9
Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1996). Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes
and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Skills needed to make inferences:
• Comprehension of linguistic input
– Vocabulary
– Syntax
• General world knowledge
– Including theory of mind (ToM)
• Working memory
– Search for information in memory
– Search in other places (look back at text)
– Check that the inference explains the premises held in
working memoryKarasinski, C., & Weismer, S.E. (2010). Comprehension of inferences in discourse processing by adolescents
with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1268-1279.
Inferencing in 4 Groups of 8th Grade Students
• Normal language group (NL)
– Normal vocab/syntax, world knowledge, working memory
• Specific language impairment group (SLI)
– Normal world knowledge
– Deficits in vocab/syntax and working memory
• Nonspecific language impairment group (NLI)
– Deficits in vocab/syntax, world knowledge, and working memory
• Low cognition group
– Normal vocab/syntax
– Deficits in world knowledge and working memory
Karasinski, C., & Weismer, S.E. (2010). Comprehension of inferences in discourse
processing by adolescents with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech,
Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1268-1279.
Research Questions
• Are inference questions based on distant information more
difficult to answer than inference questions based on
adjacent information?
• Do adolescents without language impairment answer
distance inference questions with greater accuracy than
adolescents with language impairment?
• Does working memory performance predict variation in
distant inference accuracy beyond that explained by
language and nonverbal IQ?
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
5
Inferencing in 4 Groups of 8th Grade Studentss
• Working memory : All measures correlated highly with
inference scores
• Adjacent inference questions
– No difference between NL and LC groups
– NL group better than SLI and NLI groups
• Distance inference questions
NL LC SLI NLI
– All groups of students had more difficulty with distant
inference questions than adjacent inference questions
Karasinski, C., & Weismer, S.E. (2010). Comprehension of inferences in discourse
processing by adolescents with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech,
Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1268-1279.
Working Memory, ASD, and Inferences
(Adolescents 11-18 years)
• Fatima is going to work as a waitress this weekend.
Her sister is sick and se is going to replace here.
When Fatima was a child she sat all her dolls and
pretended to be a waitress bringing glasses of water.
Also, when asked what she wasted to be when she
grew up, she always replied, “a waitress.” On top of
it, she is going to earn some money in a proper job.
Fatima was feeling excited
Fatima was feeling disappointed
Tirado, M.J., & Saldana, D. (2016). Readers with autism can produce inferences, but they
cannot answer inferential questions. J. Autism Dev Disorder, 46, 1025-1037.
Working Memory, ASD, and Inferences
(Adolescents 11-18 years)
• Isabel’s boss has told her that she has to go to England for 4
months. She’ can’t sleep since she received the news. She
doesn’t now how she will live there. She won’t have her family
nearby and, most important, she won’t be ale to talk to anyone
because she doesn’t peak English.
Neutral sentences before inference
• Twenty years ago, people rarely studied English at school and
students could choose to study other languages, such as French
or German. But nowadays, to get a job, you must speak English.
Isabel was feeling unhappy
Isabel was feeling happy
Children with LI iInferring emotions in situations
• Kindergarten children with language impairment (LI) and
typically developing children (TD) were 100% accurate in
pointing to pictures of happy, sad, mad, surprised
• TD and LI children were 100% correct in labeling happy, sad,
mad; 4 of the 12 children with LI did not label surprised correctly
• Children with LI made significantly more errors inferring
emotional reactions
• Children with LI made more errors of a different valence
Ford, J.A., & Milosky, L.M. (2003). Inferring emotional reactions in social situations:
Differences in children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and
Hearing Research, 46, 21-30.
Children with LI inferring emotions online
• Preschool children with typical language (TL) and language
impairment (LI) watched videos designed to activate
knowledge of an emotion
– It was Twinky’s birthday. He/she opened a present. It
was a big teddy bear.
– Twinky went to Grandma’s. Grandma took Twinky to the
candy store. He/she got some candy.
• Children were then shown a facial expression. In half the
scenarios, the facial expression matched the emotion in the
video (happy) and in half it did not
Ford, J., & Milosky, L. (2008). Inference generation during discourse and the relation to
social competence: An online investigation of abilities of children with and without language
impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 367-380.
Results for Inferring Emotions Online
• TL children were significantly slower to label emotions
in unmatched condition
• Children with LI did not differ in response times in the
two conditions
– Suggests they were not making inferences while
watching the videos
• Performance on the inferencing tasks predicted social
skills on the Preschool Kindergarten Behavior Scales
Ford, J., & Milosky, L. (2008). Inference generation during discourse and and its relation to
social competence: An online investigation of abilities of children with and without language
impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 367-380.
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
6
Inference in LI Children 6-10 years old
• Children with LI (6-10 years) have more difficulty with
emotional inferences than TD children
• Children with LI make more errors of valence than TD
children, e.g.,
– TD same valence errors, e.g., sad for angry
– LI different valence errors, happy for sad or
angry
Vendeville, N., Blanc, N., & Brechet, C. (2015). A drawing task to assess emotion inference in
language-impaired children. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 58, 1563-1569.
Can a verbal inference task differentiate between:
• Children with language impairment (CwLI) and
match peers with typical language development
(TLD) (6-11 years)
• Children with specific language impairment
(CwSLI) and children with pragmatic language
impairment (CwPLI)
Adams, C., Clarke, E., & Haynes, R. (2009). Inference and sentence
comprehension in children with specific or pragmatic language impairments.
International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 301-318.
Sentence Comprehension (SC) Task• 29 items that required the child to point to a picture (from a set of
four choices) or written word on the test booklet (again from a set
of four words read by the evaluator).
– direct and indirect objects ("She gave the baby the book.“)
– passive comprehension ("The dog was splashed by the
girl.")
– embedded clauses (The crocodile that bit the lion was
small.“)
– complex continuous past ("Which one have I already
eaten?")
Adams, C., Clarke, E., & Haynes, R. (2009). Inference and sentence
comprehension in children with specific or pragmatic language impairments.
International Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 301-318.
Inferential Comprehension (IC) task
• Picture of kitchen in aftermath of a burglary.
– Householder and policewoman picture with clues
• Torn piece of cloth
• Footprint
• Broken window
• Examiner read short text about picture
• Students asked 11 questions designed to tap inferencing
Adams, C., Clarke, E., & Haynes, R. (2009). Inference and sentence
comprehension in children with specific or pragmatic language impairments.
International Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 301-318.
Inferential Comprehension (IC) Questions• Why was the dog barking?
• Why is the policewoman there?
• What happened when the burglar got into the house?
• What clues will the police find about who broke in? (prompt allowed)
• Why did the burglar break into the back of the house?
• How does the family feel now? (prompt allowed)
• How do we know it was the burglar who broke the window?
• Why do you think the burglar took only the watch?
• Why would someone steal something? (prompt allowed)
• What will the family do now because of the burglary? (prompt
allowed)
• Should all theft be treated in the same way? (prompt allowed)
Coding of inference comprehension
Type of inference error Question Example
response
Failure of literal comprehension Why do you think the
burglar took only the
watch?"
cos he creeped in
Wrong inference: answer is
irrelevant in the context of the
story
How does the family
feel now?
feel better if go to
hospital
Immature inference: child links
question to own experience;
answer is relevant to the picture
but based on limited or immature
world knowledge
Why would someone
steal something?"
because they ain't
got a watch
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
7
Coding of inference comprehension
Type of inference error Question Example response
Odd inference: Unique or
unexpected given the story
premise or contained
excessive/irrelevant detail
Why was the dog
barking?
He was telling the truth
Because: minimal answer Because he did
Scope: response is along the right
lines, but either too specific or
vague
Why was the dog
barking?
Because someone
said “ow”
Lack of expressive ability:
answer is syntactically incomplete
or unintelligible
No response
Comprehension of CwLI and CwSLI• All CwLI
– Made significantly more literal comprehension errors or
failed to respond to inference questions than their SC
matched peers (didn’t understand the question).
• Suggests that CwLI cope less well with an IC task than
expected by their ability to comprehend isolated sentences
• CwSLI
– The CwSLI had significantly higher IC scores than CwPLI
– No significant differences between the types of
inferences that CwSLI and CwPLI made
Adams, C., Clarke, E., & Haynes, R. (2009). Inference and sentence comprehension in children with specific or pragmatic language impairments. International Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 301-318.
Comprehension of CwPLI
• CwPLI
– CwPLI to perform more poorly on
developmentally more complex inference items
– Did not make significantly more odd or wrong
inferences than CwSLI
– Had significantly lower inferential scores than
their CA and SC matched groups.
Adams, C., Clarke, E., & Haynes, R. (2009). Inference and sentence
comprehension in children with specific or pragmatic language impairments.
International Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 301-318.
Reading Comprehension in TD, ASD, ASD+LI
• Students with ASD without LI
answered more literal questions
correctly than TLD students, but
significantly fewer inferential
questions
• Students with ASD + Language
impairment answered the same
number of literal questions
correctly as TD students, but
significantly fewer inferential
questions correctly that students
with ASD + LI
Norbury, C., & Nation, K. (2011).
Understanding variability in reading
comprehension in adolescents with
autism spectrum disorders: Interactions
with language status and decoding skill.
Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(3),
191-210.
• Adolescents
• Nature stories that
did not include
social references
or emotional
content
TD & ASD Answering Literacy & Inferential Questions:
7-12 year olds• TD children and children with ASD with normal vocabulary and
syntax performed similarly
– Both groups answered a few more literal questions correctly than
inferential questions
• Children with LI
– Answered same number of literal questions correctly as TD children
and children with ASD without LI
– Answered significantly fewer inferential question correctly than TD
children and ASD children without LI
• Child with ASD + LI
– Answered significantly fewer literal and inferential questions than
children with LILucas, R., & Norbury, C.F. (2015). Making inferences from text: It’s vocabulary that
matters. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 58, 1224-1232.
Comprehension of physical causality, intentionality,
and emotions by persons with ASD
• Difficulty with all types of inferences, but
– Best performance on physical causality
• Errors may be related to difficult integrating world knowledge
with context/situation
– More errors on intentionality/mental states
– Most errors on emotion states
Bodner, K.E., Engelhardt, C.R., Minshew, N.J., & Williams, D.L. (2015). Making inferences: Comprehension of physical causality, intentionality, and emotions in discourse by high-functioning older children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(9),
2721-2733.
Andy was only 2 years old. He was sitting on his mother’s lap when a big dog ran
up and licked him on the check. Andy’s eyes got really big, and he started to cry.
Why did Andy do that?
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
8
Central Coherence vs Context Blindness
• Ability to derive overall meaning from a mass of
details
• A person with strong central coherence, looking at an
endless expanse of trees, would see “the forest.”
• A person with weak central coherence would see only
a whole lot of individual trees.
Inferences by 4-7 year olds (TD & ASD)
in narrative comprehension• It’s Susie’s birthday party tomorrow. Susie and her Mum go to the
supermarket to buy food for the party. Susie really hopes Mum buy her a
chocolate cake. They get a cake, some candy, and some chips. Then they
pay the cashier. Susie leaves the store smiling and feeling happy. And they
take the food home.
Nuske, H.J., & Bavin, E.L. (2011). Narrative comprehension in 4-7-year old children with autism: testing the weak central coherence account. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorder, 46, 108-119.
Question type Inference type Question Answer
Factual Where do they first go in
the story?
To the supermarket
Script Inductive Why did they give
money to the cashier?
To buy the food
Propositional deductive Why was Susie happy
when they left the store?
Her Mum bought a
chocolate cake.
Inferences by 4-7 year olds in narrative comprehension
• Children with ASD and typical children performed similarly
on factual and propositional questions
• Children with ASD performed less well on script inferences
than typically developing children
– Supports weak central coherence theory, i.e.,
problems integrating information to make script
inferences
– Propositional inferences require integrating
information within the text
Nuske, H.J., & Bavin, E.L. (2011). Narrative comprehension in 4-7-year old children with
autism: testing the weak central coherence account. International Journal of Language
and Communication Disorder, 46, 108-119.
What happens when you can’t retrieve the script
The procedure is quite simple. First you arrange items into different
groups. Of course one pile may be sufficient depending on how much
there is to do. If you have to go somewhere else due to lack of facilities
that is the next step; otherwise, you are pretty well set. It is important not
to overdo things. That is, it is better to do too few things at once than too
many. In the short run this may not seem important but complications can
easily arise. A mistake can be expensive as well. At first the whole
procedure will seem complicated. Soon, however, it will become just
another facet of life. It is difficult to foresee any end to the necessity for
this task in the immediate future, but then, one never can tell. After the
procedure is completed one arranges the materials into their appropriate
places. Eventually, they will be used once more and the whole cycle will
then have to be repeated. However, this is part of life.
Bransford, J.D., Johnson, M.K. (1972). Contextual perquisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726,
Category Induction in ASD
% of Group
Naigles, L.R., Kelley, E., Troy, E., & Fein, F. (2013). Residual difficulties with
categorical induction in children with a history of autism. J Autism Dev Disord.
43, 2048–2061.
TD Optimal HFA
Perfect 6/6 17.3 16.7 15.4
Almost perfect 5/6 52.2 27.8 23.1
Consistent 4/6 26.1 38.9 38.4
Moderate 3/6 4.3 16.7 15.4
Nonextender 0 0 7.7
Depth of Vocabulary and Inference Processing• Types of vocabulary measures
– Breadth of vocabulary: number of words known
– Depth of vocabulary: amount of knowledge about a word
• Particularly important to make inductive inferences
– Teacher, friends, play, learn, books, math --- school
– Type, keyboard, internet, email, printer, mouse ---
computer
• Depth of vocabulary affects inferences at global level even more
than at local levels
Oakhill, J., Cain, K., McCarthy, D. (2015). Inference processing in children: The
contributions of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge. In E. O’Brien, A. Cook, & R.
Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading. New York: Cambridge.
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
9
Concept Questions
• Who was Martin Luther King?
• What is racism?
• What is Washington, DC?
• What does “equal rights” mean to you?
Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J.S. (2011). Qualitative Reading Inventory-5.
Boston: Pearson.
Martin Luther King, Jr. – 5th Grade
• Explicit questions
– In some cities, what did blacks have to do on a city bus? (give up their seat)
– Why was Rosa Parks arrested? (she didn’t want to give up her seat)
– What did many people do to protest Rosa Park’s arrest? (don’t know)
– Name one way in which Martin Luther King was honored for his work. (a medal)
Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J.S. (2011). Qualitative Reading Inventory-5. Boston: Pearson.
Martin Luther King – 5th grade
• Implicit Questions
– What was Martin Luther King’s main goal? (change the law)
(relational inference - integrate across text)
– Why had people made laws separating blacks and whites? (don’t
know) (causal inference – prior knowledge)
– What happened when people refused to ride the buses? (lost
money ?? They had to change the law) (causal inference – across
the text)
– Why was Washington, D.C. an important place to protest unjust
laws? (the president lives there) (causal inference – prior
knowledge)
Types of Answers to QRI Questions
• Failure to link ideas across a passage – making relational inferences
• Failure to make causal inferences
• Failure to parse syntax
• Excessive elaboration or overreliance on prior knowledge
• Failure to know a key vocabulary word
• No response – did not answer
Dewitz, P., & Dewitz, P.K. (2003). They can read the words, but they can’tunderstand: Refining comprehension assessment. The Reading Teacher,56:5, 422-435.
Common Core Standards Requiring Inferences
Common Core
Standard
Inference
Type
Narrative Text Questions
Determine what
the text says
explicitly
Text evidence Using details from the text, what do the
topics of Ms. Rylant’s books tell us about
how she felt about animal.
Determine the
theme of the text
Theme What is the theme of the story so far? What
details in the story support the theme you’ve
chosen?
Describe/analyze
how
Text analysis Explain how events in Cynthia’s childhood
led her to write about being lonely and
needing love?
Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J.S. (2017). Qualitative reading inventory-6. Boston: Pearson.
Common Core Standards Requiring Inferences
Common
Core
Standard
Inference
Type
Narrative Text Questions
Interpret words
and phrases
as they are
used in text
Vocabulary in
context
What does “undeniable punch”
mean in the sentence, “her books
have undeniable punch?”
Explain how
an author
develops a
point of view
Point of view How did Cynthia’s point of view of
writers affect her view of herself
as a writer?
Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J.S. (2017). Qualitative reading inventory-6. Boston: Pearson.
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
10
Think Aloud Statements
Indicating Comprehension
• Paraphrases or summarizes what the author has said
• Making new meaning: makes an inference, draws a conclusion, or engages in reasoning
• Questioning that indicates understanding: asks a question based on understanding the text, e.g., questioning the motivation of a character
Think Aloud Statements
Indicating Comprehension
• Noting understanding: student recognizes that she or he understands what was read.
• Reporting prior knowledge: student reports a match with what was previously known or indicates that prior knowledge was absent or in conflict with the text
• Identifying personally: relates the text to personal experiences, makes a judgment of some sort on the basis of personal experiences, states interest or lack of it, or indicates like or dislike for a topic.
Think Aloud Statements
Indicating Lack of Comprehension
• Questioning content: asks questions about
character motivation or the applications of a
concept that indicate lack of understanding. The
student also asks about the meaning of words or
concepts.
• Noting lack of understanding: clearly states that
she or he is confused about something.
Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2017). Qualitative reading inventory-6. New York: Longman.
Factors common to those adept at inferring
• Being an active reader who wants to make
sense of text
• Competent working memory
• Monitoring comprehension
• Rich vocabulary
• Wide background knowledge
• Sharing same cultural background as that
assumed by text
What to do to Develop Inferring
• Activate prior knowledge/build knowledge
• Develop vocabulary/syntactic structures
• Develop theory of mind
• Teach questioning
• Teach summarizing
Metacognitive Processes
• Knowledge of the factors that influence one’s own performance
• Knowing different types of strategies to use
• Knowledge about why and when to use a given strategy.
Knowledge of Cognition
• Planning, monitoring, and regulating learning
• Evaluating one’s own regulation; assessing results and strategies used
Regulation of Cognition
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
11
What’s more precious than rubies, more lasting than gold?
What can never be traded, stolen, or sold?
What comes with great effort and takes time, but then,
Once yours, will serve you again and again.
Raisel’s RiddleBuild Vocabulary Depth
• Identify important words in the passage
• Activate important facts about those words
• Reason about those facts, computing relationships
among the words
Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (1998). Facilitating knowledge-based inferences
in less skilled readers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 142-172.
Expanding Expression ToolPenguin
What group does it belong to? Animal, bird
What does it do? What do you
do with it?
Swims, doesn’t fly, eat fish
What color, size, shape is it? Black and white, different sizes
What is it made of or come
from?
??
What are its parts? What parts
go with it?
Bill/beak, feathers, webbed feet
Where do you find it? Many live in Antarctica; some live in South
Africa, Australia, New Zealand; also zoos
Other knowledge about it Seals eat penguins; I’ve read stories
about Tacky the Penguin
Dan heard the door
open and wondered
who had arrived. He
couldn’t make out the
voices. Then he
recognized the
XXXXXX footsteps on
the stairs and knew it
was Aunt Grace.
Dan heard the door
open and wondered
who had arrived. He
couldn’t make out the
voices. Then he
recognized the
lumbering footsteps on
the stairs and knew it
was Aunt Grace.
Nondirective Vocabulary Context
General Vocabulary Context
Joe and Stan arrived at the party at 7 o’clock. By 9:30, the evening seemed to drag for Stan. But Joe really seemed to be having a good time at the party. “I wish I could be as XXXXXXX as he is,” thought Stan.
Joe and Stan arrived at the party at 7 o’clock. By 9:30, the evening seemed to drag for Stan. But Joe really seemed to be having a good time at the party. “I wish I could be as gregarious as he is,” thought Stan.
General Contexts that enable inferring of meaning
• Murderers are usually incarcerated for longer
periods of time than robbers.
• Ben is fearless, but his brother is timorous.
• Dad gave credence to my story, but Mom’s reaction
was one of total disbelief
• When we invite the Paulsons for dinner, they never
invite us to their home for a meal; however, when
we have the Browns to dinner, they always
reciprocate.
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
12
Cloze treatment: Inferring vocabulary
• Integrate background knowledge and text information to generate inferences
– The car skidded out of control and crashed through the railing over
the _______. (using semantic, syntactic, and world knowledge)
– The car skidded out of control and crashed through the railing over
the ______. The boat below was halfway under the bridge and missed
being hit. (use information subsequent to the cloze blank)
– It had rained and there was still no grass by the new house. The dogs
were rolling in the mud and spreading dirt everywhere. The girl ran to
catch her dog and slipped in the ______. (refer to information
previous to the blank)
Dewitz, P., Carr, E., & Patberg, J. (1987). Effects of inference training on comprehension
and comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 99-121.
Teaching Vocabulary
Word Dictionary
Definition
Friendly Definition
devious straying from the
right course; not
straightforward
If someone is devious, he is using
tricky and secretive ways to do
something dishonest
pungent sharply affecting the
organs of taste or
smell, as if by a
penetrating power;
biting; acrid.
Something that is pungent has a
smell or taste that is very sharp
and strong, sometimes so strong it
is unpleasant
Sentences using dictionary definitions
• He was devious on his bike.
• The dog was pungent the bone.
• The student made a capricious on her math test.
• Jim has a smirk on his face.
Vocabulary instruction
• Contextualize word for its role in the story
• Have children repeat word so they create a phonological representation
• Explain the meaning of the word
• Give examples in contexts other than the story.
• Children provide their own examples
• Children say word again to reinforce its phonological representation
Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life. New York: Guilford.
Evaluating Vocabulary Knowledge
Red Zone
Red-light
words
Yellow Zone
Yellow-light words
Green Zone
Green-light
words
I don’t know
the word
I understand
the general
meaning of the
word but can’
use it
I can give
examples of
the word
I can define
the word
I know the
word well and
can use the
word meaning
I need to stop
and use
clarifying
strategies
I need to slow down and check my
comprehension
I can read at
the speed limit
Lubliner, S. (2005). Getting into words: Vocabulary instruction that strengthens comprehension. Baltimore: Brookes.
Learning Multiple Meaning Words
• Many English words have multiple meanings
• Children with language impairments (LI) have fewer
meanings for words
• Children with LI frequently have difficulty retrieving
word meanings
• Ability to rapidly retrieve word meanings promotes
comprehension
Nelson, J.R., & Marchand-Martella, N. (2005). The multiple meaning vocabulary program.
Boston, MA: Sopris West.
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
13
Multiple meaning words: innocent
• Not guilty of an offense
– Blameless: Stanley was blameless of the robbery.
– Guiltless: The court did not find Stanley guiltless.
– In the clear: Stanley’s social worker proved that he was in the clear.
• Not experienced
– Naïve: Stanley was naïve about the functioning of the court.
– Unsophisticated: Stanley’s unsophisticated parents did not the implications of sending Stanley to Camp Green Lake.
– Unaware: Zero was unaware that the sploosh would make him sick.
Multiple meaning words: innocent
• Not dangerous or harmful
– Harmless: A yellow-spotted lizard is not harmless.
– Risk free: Being sent to Camp Green Lake was not risk free.
– Playful: Sometimes the boys argued in a playful manner.
Multiple meaning words:
Match the sentence to its meaning
• not guilty of an offense
• not experienced
• not dangerous or
harmful
• Stanley thought his comment
was innocent, but it made
Zero very angry.
• Stanley was a really good
kid; he was too innocent to
be with boys who were real
bullies.
• Stanley’s parents knew
Stanley was innocent of
stealing the shoes.
Is the word used as expected?
• When Zero confessed to stealing the shoes, he
proved he was innocent.
• Stanley’s teaching Zero to read was an innocent
activity.
• X-ray really knew how to survive in at Camp Green
Lake. He was the boy’s leader because he was so
innocent.
• The social worker knew Stanley was innocent
because he was in school when the shoes were
taken.
Wordsift Cloud (www.wordsift.org
What does the word cloud suggest this article is about?
What seem to be the most important words?
How do these words go together?
https://wordart.com/create
• The black widow spider
– Widow, prey, poisonous, scamper, fluid
• The American colonies
– colony, independence, migrate, settlers, trade
• Whales
– Adapt, agile, depths, docile, frolic, glide, tragic,
treacherous, vicious
Teach Vocabulary in Thematic groups
Bowers, L. (2011). Word feast elementary. Pro-Ed: Austin, TX.
Johnson, P. (2011). Word feast middleschool. Pro-Ed: Austin, TX.
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
14
SERP Word Generation Program
• Program to teach academic vocabulary language,
discussion, argumentation, and thinking skills to students
in 4th-8th grades
• Words are taught in multiple contexts over 5-10 lessons
• Available free: http://wordgen.serpmedia.org
Teach Vocabulary in Thematic groups Most Common Prefixes: Grades 3-4
un- pre-
re- inter-
in-, im-, ir, il-(not) fore-
dis- de-
en-, em- trans-
non- super-
in-, im- (in or into) semi-
over-(too much) anti-
mis- mid-
sub- under-
Teaching Suffixes
-er definitions and examples
“more”
(comparative adjective)
“one who”
(noun)
“that which”
(noun)
stronger
thicker
softer
teacher
traveler
pitcher
toaster
washer
hanger
Ebbers, S.M. (2011). Vocabulary through morphemes: Suffixes, prefixes,
and roots for intermediate grades. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
-ly definitions and examples
“In a manner that
is” (adverb)
“Like a (noun)”
(adjective)
Time-related
adverbs
Time-related
adjectives
kindly (“in a
manner that is
kind”)
speaks kindly
sisterly (“like a
sister”)
a sisterly hug
suddenly
suddenly faints
daily (once a
day) daily
vitamins
quietly
firmly
sweetly
courageously
friendly
kingly
motherly
beggerly
periodically
instantly
eternally
constantly
weekly
monthly
annually
Ebbers, S.M. (2011). Vocabulary through morphemes: Suffixes, prefixes, and
roots for intermediate grades. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
Morphology Grades 5-6• Greek and Latin word roots
– Most common Greek roots: tela (far, distant); therm(heat); photo (light)
– Move to Latin roots with aim to gain understanding of a few frequently occurring roots: tract (drag, pull); spect (look); spect (look); port (carry), dict (say), rupt(to break); scrib (to write)
• Greek and Latin prefixes
– E.g., inter-(between); intra- (within); post- (after); pro-(in front of, forward); co-.com-con- (together); sub-(under); pre- (before); anti- (against)
Ebbers, S.M. (2004). Vocabulary through morphemes: Suffixes, prefixes,
and roots for intermediate grades. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
Somebody Wanted/Because But So
Percy to stop Medusa
because she could
stop him from
finding the lightning
thief
if he looked at her
when he swung his
sword he would be
turned to stone
he looked at her
reflection in a
mirror and swung
his sword behind
him
Syntax for expressing inferences/interpetations
Who When Emotion Why
Percy When Annabeth warned
Percy that Aunty Em is
Medusa
Terrified he knew Medusa
could turn him into
stone
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
15
Question-Answer-Relationships• Where is the answer?
– Right there!Words are right there in the text
• Where is the answer?– Think and search!
Words are in the text, but not spelled out for you. Think about what the author is saying.
• Where is the answer?– You and the author!
Think about what you have learned and what is in the text.• Where is the answer?
– On your own!– Answer is in you head.
Raphael, T.E. (1986). Teaching question/answer relationships, revisited. The Reading Teacher, 39, 516-522.
QAR (Question-Answer-Response)
Passage to Freedom: The Sugihara Story
• Right there
– Why were the Sugihara family living in Lithuania?
• Think and search
– In what ways did Hiroki’s life change after the Polish Jews came to his house?
• Author and you
– What is a visa?
– Why didn’t Mrs. Sugihara help write the visas?
• On you own
– Can you think of someone else who has risked his or her own life to save other persons?
Landscape of Action Landscape of Consciousness
• What characters do
• How they do it
Mrs. Pig called for a
babysitter.
Mrs. Pig opened the door.
The babysitter is a wolf.
The babysitter it holding
an umbrella.
• What characters feel and think.
• Why they feel and think as they do?
• Making judgments about the
characters
Mrs. Pig doesn’t know it’s a wolf.
The wolf is tricking Mrs. Pig. The wolf
wants to eat the piglets.
The baby pigs are scared, so they’re
running.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible
worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Emotional Thermometers
Petrified
Hysterical
Terrified
Scared/frightened
Startled
Unnerved
Disturbed
Dismayed
Angry
Annoyed
Bothered
Enraged
Incensed
Livid/furious
Aggravated
Irritated
Provoked
Predicting Dialogue & Thoughts
She’ll be pleased with how
I’m handling the boys and
reward me.
There’s been a little
trouble on the lake.
Caveman will tell
you about it.
I don’t care
what the boys
do as long as
they find the
treasure
Picture of
Mr. SirPicture of
the Warden
Mr. Sir isn’t
doing his job.
He’s got to learn
what I want!
That’s why you
brought him here?Observations
Stanley in hole
Lizards with yellow spots on him
Lizards aren’t biting him
Seems to be looking up at someone
Doesn’t look happy
Old chest in background
Many lizards on chest
InferencesMaybe the chest is really
important; Stanley was told to
look for things in the holes.
Why aren’t the lizards biting; is
something protecting him?
Maybe he’s looking at the warden,
cause she wanted him to find
something.
Maybe the chest is what the
warden had been looking for.
The warden can’t get the chest
‘cause the lizards are on it.
Won’t be able to get what’s in the
chest
Nokes, J.D. (2008). The observation/inference chart:
Improving students’ abilities to make inferences while reading nontraditional texts. Journal of Adolescent &
Adult Literacy, 51:7, 538-546.
Photo of Stanley in a
hole he has been
digging
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
16
Observation/Inference Rubric
• Observations
1.Few observations
2.Many observations but not specific or detailed
3.Many observations including ones that are specific and detailed
• Inferences linked to observations
1.Some inferences but they are not based on observations
2.Bases inferences on observations but does not show the relationship
3.Bases inferences on observation and shows the relationship
Nokes, J.D. (2008). The observation/inference chart: Improving students’ abilities to make inferences
while reading nontraditional texts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51:7, 538-546.
Observation/Inference Rubric
• Inferences
1.Makes few inferences or inferences that have no basis
2.Several good inferences, but explanations may be fairly obvious
3.Many good inferences, including ones that show depth of thinking
Nokes, J.D. (2008). The observation/inference chart: Improving students’ abilities to make inferences
while reading nontraditional texts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51:7, 538-546.
Inner-Outer Prediction Chart
Character Outer Prediction
(Events,
Actions,
Relationships
Why?
(Evidence)
Inner Predictions
(Personality,
Maturity, Learning,
Emotions)
Why? (Evidence)
Zero He’ll keep
running and
won’t die.
He’s pretty smart
even though people
think he isn’t.
He’ll be scared, but
he’ll be glad to be
out of camp
He doesn’t know
where he’s going,
but there won’t be
people calling him
stupid
The warden She’ll just let
Zero go
She’s knows he’ll
have to come back
cause he doesn’t
have water
She doesn’t
Stanley He’ll go after
Zero
He’s Zero’s friend;
Zero’s dug holes for
Stanley and Stanley
taught Zero to read
He’s worried that
Zero will be dead
It’s been 2 days and
Zero didn’t have
any water with him
Zero has run off into the desertPerspectives
Stanley Events Mr. Sir
Thirsty, thinks Mr. Sir is
offering him a drink
Arriving at Camp Green
Lake
Intends to taunt
Stanley by drinking in
front of him
Worried cause boys
threw seeds in his
hole. Lies to protect
friends
Stanley says he stole
Mr. Sir’s sunflower
seeds
Doesn’t believe
Stanley. Decides to
have warden deal with
him.
Frightened – what
might the warden do to
him
Warden scratches Mr.
Sir
Surprised, angry;
didn’t expect this
PerspectivesStanley Events Mr. Sir
Disappointed they’re
not going after Zero,
then worried
Zero runs off.
Warden/Mr. Sir don’t go
after Zero; destroy
Zero’s records
Indifferent to Zero; just
don’t want anyone to
know he went missing
Wants to save Zero;
frustrated & scared,
but determined when
truck falls in hole
Stanley runs the truck in
a hole; then runs off into
the desert
Initially furious; then
worried if someone
discovers he’s missing
Relieved that they
haven’t been bitten
and that they may be
rescued
Stanley and Zero in
hole with lizards, but
lizards haven’t bitten;
lawyer arrives
Apprehensive about
what lawyer will ask
and what she knows
about him
Reasons for Limited Character Inferences
• Focusing on what’s happening not why
• Thinking that story characters are just like them
• Focusing on only a small part of the story
• Focusing on the main character’s perspective
only
Emery, D.W. (1996). Helping readers comprehend stories from the
characters' perspective. The Reading Teacher, 49, 534-541.
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
17
Coping with Inferencing Difficulties
• When students focus on what happened instead of why
– Why did A act in this way?
– How is A feeling now?
Emery, D.W. (1996). Helping readers comprehend stories from the
characters' perspective. The Reading Teacher, 49, 534-541.
Coping with Inferencing Difficulties
• When students misinterpret character’s feelings and thoughts because they are considering only their own perspective
– Is that the way you would have felt?
– Is what way is (character) different from you?
– Since the character is different in this way, how do you think the character felt?
– Let me reread some of the parts that may help us understand why the character might respond differently than you would.
Emery, D.W. (1996). Helping readers comprehend stories from the characters' perspective. The Reading Teacher, 49, 534-541.
Coping with Inferencing Difficulties
• When students’ replies are inadequate because they are focusing on only one part of the story instead of the whole
– What else might the character want?…be thinking? be feeling?
– Think about the part where the character did X and Y at the beginning.
– What does that tell you about what the character might be thinking now?
Emery, D.W. (1996). Helping readers comprehend stories from the characters'
perspective. The Reading Teacher, 49, 534-541.
Coping with Inferencing Difficulties
• When students consider only one character’s perspective
– We mentioned A. What about B? How is B feeling?
– What did A believe that B was thinking/feeling/wanting?
– What did B believe that A was thinking/feeling/wanting
– When A did that, how did A think B would react?
– What was A believing about B when A did that?
Emery, D.W. (1996). Helping readers comprehend stories from the characters'
perspective. The Reading Teacher, 49, 534-541.
Think-alouds to promote infering
Promote
• Intrapersonal ToM
– Reflecting on what one knows/doesn’t know;
understands/ doesn’t understand; what one
can or can not understand
• Interpersonal ToM
– Inferring what characters are thinking, feeling
Think Aloud
“From the
title I think
this will be
about...”
Strategies to Build
Inferential Comprehension
Students read silently as teacher reads aloud
Teacher thinks through tricky spots
Make predictions from
book title and cover
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
18
“I have a picture of this scene in my head and this
is what it looks like....”
Teacher thinks through more difficult parts of the text and
Think Aloud
Outside the storm grew worse. Still shaking, Ben picked up the receiver and held it to his good ear. He hesitated then
dialed the number. He slid the bookmark between the pages of the book.
Describes the pictures you form in
your head about the information.
Think Aloud
The description on the wolf exhibit at the museum says the scene is at the margin of Gunflint Lake, MN. I remember at the beginning of this book that Ben is from there. Had the person who created this exhibit been at Gunflint Lake. Maybe it was the Daniel that Ben is looking for.
Make connections explicit: Show how to link prior
information stated in the text to new information in
text. “I remember about....and now….”
Demonstrate fix-up strategies: Show how to make sense of the passage. “I’d better reread.” or “I’ll read ahead and see if I can get some more information.”
Think Aloud
After you complete reading and Think Aloud, encourage students to add their own thoughts to yours.
Questioning the Author• Addresses text as product of fallible author
• Some types of queries
– What is the author trying to say here? What is the author
talking about?
• I know that’s what the author said, but what did the author
mean?
– What do you think the author wants us to know?
– Does this make sense with what the author told us before?
– How does this connect to what the author told us earlier?
– Why do you think the author tells us this now?
– How does the author let us know something has changed?
Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G. (2006). Improving comprehension with questioning the author. New York:
Scholastic.
Reciprocal Teaching
• Prediction
• Questioning
• Clarification
• Summarization
Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of
comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring
activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
Predict Question
Use cues from the text or
illustrations to predict what
will happen next
•I think…because…
•I’ll bet…because…
•I suppose …because…
•I think I will
learn…because…
Ask questions as you
read. Some are answered
in the book and others are
inferred
•I wonder…
•Who? What? When?
Where? Why? How?
•Why do you think?
Reciprocal Teaching
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
19
Clarify Summarize
Reciprocal Teaching
Clarify
How can you figure out
tricky or hard words and
ideas?
I didn’t get the (word, idea)
so…
•Reread
•Read on
•Sound words out
•Ask if it makes sense
•Talk to a friend
Summarization
Using your own words, tell
the main ideas from the text
in order
This text is about…
This part is about…
First…
Next…
Then…
Finally
Promoting Predicting
• Model predictions using think-alouds and text cues
• Ask students to preview illustrations and headings
and think about what they will learn from text
• Use what you know about text structure to predict
• Periodically summarize what has happened so far
and add, “Now I think… because….”
Oczkus, L.D. (2010). Reciprocal Teaching at work. Newark, DE:
International Reading Association.
Promoting Clarifying
• Model words and ideas to clarify
• Use the prompt “I don’t get the [word, idea, chapter] so I…”
• Require students to provide an example (if they have
nothing to clarify, ask them to select a word/idea a younger
student might have trouble with)
• Give students a copy of text and having students underline
words to clarify in one color and sentences to clarify in
another
Oczhus, L.D. (2010). Reciprocal teaching at work. Newark, DE: International
Reading Association.
Promoting Questioning
• Model how to formulate different types of questions
• Modeling higher level questions that require using
textual cues and prior knowledge
• Asking students to reflect: How does this question
help us understand the text
• Providing question starters, e.g., “Why do you
think…?
Oczkus, L.D. (2010). Reciprocal Teaching at work. Newark, DE:
International Reading Association.
Question Types
• Zwiers, J. (2010). Building
reading comprehension
habits in grades 6-12: A
toolkit of classroom
activities. Newark, DE:
International Reading
Association
• On the surface
– Who, what, when, where
• Under the surface
– How, why, what if, would
• On the sea floor: Life
application
– Opinions, how does this
text relate to real life
Promoting SummarizingSummarizing =/= retelling
Retell
Summary
ThemeMain Idea
Carol Westby
Copyright © 2017 C. Westby
Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference
June 23, 2017
20
The three little pigs
wanted to build their own
houses,
but a wolf kept blowing them
down one at a time.
So, each piggy escaped to his
brother’s house for safety.
In the end, all three pigs were
safe in the last pig’s brick house.
The five finger narrative summary
• Somebody
• Wanted
• But
• So
• In the end
Metacognition
We’ve got metacognition, running through our mind.
We’ve got metacognition and it isn’t hard to find.
Can’t you hear our thoughts a calling
Listen to our song.
We’ve got metacognition.
Learning all day long.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvyZsSQ3ul4