+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Carol Westby Annual Social Thinking Global Providers...

Carol Westby Annual Social Thinking Global Providers...

Date post: 31-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: hoangkhanh
View: 215 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
20
Carol Westby Copyright © 2017 C. Westby Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference June 23, 2017 1 Carol Westby, PhD Bilingual and Multicultural Services Albuquerque, NM [email protected] [email protected] Infer! Infer! Filling what's not in the book! The Inference Song https ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_ZNP5aj5fs Email for final more complete file Obanya, P. (2003). Towards a Reading Society. Read Across & Beyond the Lines Read Between the Lines (understanding inferred meaning) Read Along the Lines (decoding and understanding literal meanings) Comprehension Requires That Readers build a mental model or representation of the situation or world (real or imaginary) described in the text. Perfetti, C., (1997). Sentences, individual differences, and multiple texts: Three issues in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 23, 337-355. Textbase Model Text Microstructure Words Sentences Cohesive structures Text Macrostructure Text organization Gist or theme Situation/Scenario Mapping Model Comprehensive referential meaning of the real or imaginary situation described in the text. Knowledge, experiences, propositions from long-term memory Mental Modeling for Texts NAEP Grade 4 Questions for Hungry Spider and Turtle When turtle remains quiet about his mistreatment by Spider, the author wants you to: believe turtle is afraid have sympathy for turtle feel dislike for turtle think turtle deserved no dinner Spider’s behavior during the first part of the story is most like that of: mothers protecting their children thieves robbing banks runners losing races people not sharing their wealth Oakhill, J. & Yuill, N. (1996). Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties:Processes and intervention. (pp. 69- 92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. REASONS FOR INFERENCING DIFFICULTIES Lack of general knowledge Have difficulty accessing relevant background knowledge and integrating it with what is in the text Less skilled at synthesizing information from different parts of text and making relevant inferences May not realize tht inferences are necessary
Transcript

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

1

Carol Westby, PhD

Bilingual and Multicultural Services

Albuquerque, NM

[email protected]

[email protected]

Infer! Infer!

Filling what's not in the book!

The Inference Song

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_ZNP5aj5fs

Email for final more complete file

Obanya, P. (2003). Towards a Reading Society.

Read Across & Beyond the Lines

Read Between the Lines

(understanding inferred meaning)

Read Along the Lines

(decoding and understanding literal meanings)

Comprehension Requires That

Readers build a mental model or

representation of the situation or world

(real or imaginary) described in the text.

Perfetti, C., (1997). Sentences, individual differences, andmultiple texts: Three issues in text comprehension. DiscourseProcesses, 23, 337-355.

Textbase Model

Text Microstructure

Words

Sentences

Cohesive structures

Text Macrostructure

Text organization

Gist or theme

Situation/Scenario Mapping Model

Comprehensive referential meaning

of the real or imaginary situation

described in the text.

Knowledge, experiences,

propositions from

long-term memory

Mental Modeling

for Texts

NAEP Grade 4 Questions for

Hungry Spider and Turtle

• When turtle remains quiet about his mistreatment by Spider, the author wants you to:

– believe turtle is afraid

– have sympathy for turtle

– feel dislike for turtle

– think turtle deserved no dinner

• Spider’s behavior during the first part of the story is most like that of:

– mothers protecting their children

– thieves robbing banks

– runners losing races

– people not sharing their wealth

Oakhill, J. & Yuill, N. (1996). Higher order factors in comprehension

disability: Processes and remediation. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.),

Reading comprehension difficulties:Processes and intervention. (pp. 69-

92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

REASONS FOR INFERENCING DIFFICULTIES

• Lack of general knowledge

• Have difficulty accessing relevant background

knowledge and integrating it with what is in the text

• Less skilled at synthesizing information from different

parts of text and making relevant inferences

• May not realize tht inferences are necessary

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

2

Why do students with LI tolerate ambiguity in texts?

They are less aware:

• That a text should make sense to them

• That they should be monitoring their understanding

for potential inconsistencies

• About strategies to adopt when beginning with a

text

• About strategies to adopt when an inconsistency

occurs

• About the information that is relevant to the drawing

of inferences

Name Example Explanation

Coherence

or

intersentence

or text-

connecting

Peter begged his

mother to let him

go to the party.

Maintains textual

integrity. Reader must

realize that pronouns

“his” and “him refer to

Peter to understand the

sentence.

Classification of Inferences:

How they make text coherent

Name Example Explanation

Elaborative

or gap-filling

or

knowledge-

based

Kathy dropped the

vase. She ran for

the dustpan and

brush to sweep up

the pieces.

Enriches mental

representation of text.

Drawing on life

experiences and

general knowledge,

reader has to realize

that the vase broke to

supply the connection

between the sentences.

Classification of Inferences:

How they make text coherentName Example Explanation

Local

1. Coherence

inferences

2. Antecedent

causal

inferences

Peter begged his mother to

let him go to the party.

She tried to flag down the

car, but the driver of the car

seemed oblivious to her.

He rushed off, leaving his

bike unchained.

Creates a coherent representation

at the local level of sentences and

paragraphs

Reader must realize that pronouns

“his” and “him refer to Peter

Reader must recognize that

“vehicle” refers to “car”

The reader would infer that Dan

was in a hurry and left his bicycle

vulnerable to theft.

Classification of Inferences:

How they make text coherent

Name Example Explanation

Global Inferences about the theme,

main point, or moral of a

text.

To create a coherent representation of the

whole text, the reader would infer over-

arching ideas by drawing on local pieces

of information.

Classification of Inferences:

How they make text coherent Logical Inferences

Deductive

All mammals are warm-

blooded and have fur. A

tapir is a mammal. Is a tapir

warm-blooded? Does it

have fur?

Inductive

This animal is warm-blooded.

It has fur. It feeds its young

milk. I think it is a mammal.

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

3

Deductive Inferences

• Demigods are children who have one human parent

and one parent who is a Greek or Roman god. Percy’s

father is Neptune, the Greek god of the sea. His

mother is a human who works in New York. Percy is a

demigod.

• Percy is the son of Neptune, god of the sea. If he is

the son of the god of the sea, then he should be very

comfortable in the water, be able to hold his breath

under water for a long time, or breathe under water.

He won’t drown when the ship blows up.

Inductive Inferences

Who is Jason’s Father?

• First off, he survived a lightning strike; Zeus is the god of

lightning. I'll admit, that's a big chunk of fresh evidence!

People also think that because Zeus ruled the sky and

Jason can fly, that it means Jason has to belong to him. But

I don't remember any of Zeus‘ children having the power of

flight. Some believe that since Jason appears to be a main

character that he has to be a son of one of the Big Three.

Inductive InferencesWho is Jason’s Father?

• Aeolus is the God presiding over and keeping the winds. Well it

would explain Jason's ability to fly and his connection to the Anemoi

Thuellai (Venti in Roman). I think, though, that there is a better

choice.

• Boreus is the North Wind. This one is the most plausible to me.

Why, you ask? Well, first off in the myth "Jason and the Argonauts",

the title character ("our" Jason's namesake) lost his shoe. Remind

you of anything? Second off, there were some characters in that

myth that could fly. Guess who their daddy is? My last bit of

evidence: Being a child of the North Wind would definitely explain

why he knew who the Anemoi Thuellai were.

Classes of Inferences

• Anaphoric references: pronoun/noun-phrase that refers to previous text entity

• Bridging/relational: semantically or conceptually relating sentence to previous content

• Explanation-based/causal: explain what is read by a causal chain or network of previous events and states

• The warden scratched Mr. Sir. She

was furious with him.

• Making the connection between the

eating onions and not being bitten

by lizards

• Stanley befriending Zero, carrying

him up the mountain and saving his

life breaks the curse of Madam

Zaroni and brings the family good

luck. Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Rand Corporation.

Classes of Inferences

• Predictive: forecast what events will unfold

• Goal: infer intentions of agent

• Elaborative: properties and associations that cannot be explained by causal relationships

• Stanley will find Zero in the desert and they will run away from camp.

• The Warden is running the camp so she’ll have help finding a treasure.

• The Warden’s nail polish has rattlesnake venom in it. So when she scratches Mr. Sir, you must realize that the scratch will be more painful and harmful than an ordinary scratch

Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding:

Toward an R & D program in reading

comprehension. Rand Corporation.

Intrapersonal

Reflect on one’s

own emotions

Regulate one’s

own emotions

and motivation

Interpersonal

Recognize

emotions of others

Infer emotions of

others

Infer behavior

based on emotions

Empathize with

others

Theory of Mind

Cognitive Affective

Interpersonal

Understand that

others can have

thoughts, beliefs,

desires different

than my own

Infer mental states

of others

Infer behavior

based on thoughts

Intrapersonal

Reflect on one’s own

mental states

Plan one’s behavior

Intrapersonal

Reflect on one’s

own mental states

Use metacognitive

learning strategies;

monitor

comprehension

Plan one’s

behavior

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

4

Gap-filling Inferences

• Theory of mind – prospective taking

• Bringing in past personal experiences

• Linking to other texts

Early Studies of LI and Inferencing

• On both verbal and visually presented stories,

children with language impairments make fewer

total inferences and more inference errors than

typically developing children

•Bishop, D.V.M., & Adams, C. (1992). Comprehension problems in children with specific

language impairment: Literal and inferential meaning. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,

35, 119-129.

•Crais, E., & Chapman, R. (1987). Story recall and inferencing skills in language/learning-

disabled and nondisabled children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 50-55.

•Ellis Weismer, S. (1985). Constructive comprehension abilities exhibited by language-

disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 175-184.

% Errors on Literal and Inferential Questions

by students with Reading Comprehension Deficits

Unseen Seen

Literal Inferential Literal Inferential

Less skilled

29.2 45.8 3.6 35.4

Skilled 10.9 15.6 1.0 9.9

Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1996). Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes

and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Skills needed to make inferences:

• Comprehension of linguistic input

– Vocabulary

– Syntax

• General world knowledge

– Including theory of mind (ToM)

• Working memory

– Search for information in memory

– Search in other places (look back at text)

– Check that the inference explains the premises held in

working memoryKarasinski, C., & Weismer, S.E. (2010). Comprehension of inferences in discourse processing by adolescents

with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1268-1279.

Inferencing in 4 Groups of 8th Grade Students

• Normal language group (NL)

– Normal vocab/syntax, world knowledge, working memory

• Specific language impairment group (SLI)

– Normal world knowledge

– Deficits in vocab/syntax and working memory

• Nonspecific language impairment group (NLI)

– Deficits in vocab/syntax, world knowledge, and working memory

• Low cognition group

– Normal vocab/syntax

– Deficits in world knowledge and working memory

Karasinski, C., & Weismer, S.E. (2010). Comprehension of inferences in discourse

processing by adolescents with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech,

Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1268-1279.

Research Questions

• Are inference questions based on distant information more

difficult to answer than inference questions based on

adjacent information?

• Do adolescents without language impairment answer

distance inference questions with greater accuracy than

adolescents with language impairment?

• Does working memory performance predict variation in

distant inference accuracy beyond that explained by

language and nonverbal IQ?

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

5

Inferencing in 4 Groups of 8th Grade Studentss

• Working memory : All measures correlated highly with

inference scores

• Adjacent inference questions

– No difference between NL and LC groups

– NL group better than SLI and NLI groups

• Distance inference questions

NL LC SLI NLI

– All groups of students had more difficulty with distant

inference questions than adjacent inference questions

Karasinski, C., & Weismer, S.E. (2010). Comprehension of inferences in discourse

processing by adolescents with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech,

Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1268-1279.

Working Memory, ASD, and Inferences

(Adolescents 11-18 years)

• Fatima is going to work as a waitress this weekend.

Her sister is sick and se is going to replace here.

When Fatima was a child she sat all her dolls and

pretended to be a waitress bringing glasses of water.

Also, when asked what she wasted to be when she

grew up, she always replied, “a waitress.” On top of

it, she is going to earn some money in a proper job.

Fatima was feeling excited

Fatima was feeling disappointed

Tirado, M.J., & Saldana, D. (2016). Readers with autism can produce inferences, but they

cannot answer inferential questions. J. Autism Dev Disorder, 46, 1025-1037.

Working Memory, ASD, and Inferences

(Adolescents 11-18 years)

• Isabel’s boss has told her that she has to go to England for 4

months. She’ can’t sleep since she received the news. She

doesn’t now how she will live there. She won’t have her family

nearby and, most important, she won’t be ale to talk to anyone

because she doesn’t peak English.

Neutral sentences before inference

• Twenty years ago, people rarely studied English at school and

students could choose to study other languages, such as French

or German. But nowadays, to get a job, you must speak English.

Isabel was feeling unhappy

Isabel was feeling happy

Children with LI iInferring emotions in situations

• Kindergarten children with language impairment (LI) and

typically developing children (TD) were 100% accurate in

pointing to pictures of happy, sad, mad, surprised

• TD and LI children were 100% correct in labeling happy, sad,

mad; 4 of the 12 children with LI did not label surprised correctly

• Children with LI made significantly more errors inferring

emotional reactions

• Children with LI made more errors of a different valence

Ford, J.A., & Milosky, L.M. (2003). Inferring emotional reactions in social situations:

Differences in children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and

Hearing Research, 46, 21-30.

Children with LI inferring emotions online

• Preschool children with typical language (TL) and language

impairment (LI) watched videos designed to activate

knowledge of an emotion

– It was Twinky’s birthday. He/she opened a present. It

was a big teddy bear.

– Twinky went to Grandma’s. Grandma took Twinky to the

candy store. He/she got some candy.

• Children were then shown a facial expression. In half the

scenarios, the facial expression matched the emotion in the

video (happy) and in half it did not

Ford, J., & Milosky, L. (2008). Inference generation during discourse and the relation to

social competence: An online investigation of abilities of children with and without language

impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 367-380.

Results for Inferring Emotions Online

• TL children were significantly slower to label emotions

in unmatched condition

• Children with LI did not differ in response times in the

two conditions

– Suggests they were not making inferences while

watching the videos

• Performance on the inferencing tasks predicted social

skills on the Preschool Kindergarten Behavior Scales

Ford, J., & Milosky, L. (2008). Inference generation during discourse and and its relation to

social competence: An online investigation of abilities of children with and without language

impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 367-380.

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

6

Inference in LI Children 6-10 years old

• Children with LI (6-10 years) have more difficulty with

emotional inferences than TD children

• Children with LI make more errors of valence than TD

children, e.g.,

– TD same valence errors, e.g., sad for angry

– LI different valence errors, happy for sad or

angry

Vendeville, N., Blanc, N., & Brechet, C. (2015). A drawing task to assess emotion inference in

language-impaired children. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 58, 1563-1569.

Can a verbal inference task differentiate between:

• Children with language impairment (CwLI) and

match peers with typical language development

(TLD) (6-11 years)

• Children with specific language impairment

(CwSLI) and children with pragmatic language

impairment (CwPLI)

Adams, C., Clarke, E., & Haynes, R. (2009). Inference and sentence

comprehension in children with specific or pragmatic language impairments.

International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 301-318.

Sentence Comprehension (SC) Task• 29 items that required the child to point to a picture (from a set of

four choices) or written word on the test booklet (again from a set

of four words read by the evaluator).

– direct and indirect objects ("She gave the baby the book.“)

– passive comprehension ("The dog was splashed by the

girl.")

– embedded clauses (The crocodile that bit the lion was

small.“)

– complex continuous past ("Which one have I already

eaten?")

Adams, C., Clarke, E., & Haynes, R. (2009). Inference and sentence

comprehension in children with specific or pragmatic language impairments.

International Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 301-318.

Inferential Comprehension (IC) task

• Picture of kitchen in aftermath of a burglary.

– Householder and policewoman picture with clues

• Torn piece of cloth

• Footprint

• Broken window

• Examiner read short text about picture

• Students asked 11 questions designed to tap inferencing

Adams, C., Clarke, E., & Haynes, R. (2009). Inference and sentence

comprehension in children with specific or pragmatic language impairments.

International Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 301-318.

Inferential Comprehension (IC) Questions• Why was the dog barking?

• Why is the policewoman there?

• What happened when the burglar got into the house?

• What clues will the police find about who broke in? (prompt allowed)

• Why did the burglar break into the back of the house?

• How does the family feel now? (prompt allowed)

• How do we know it was the burglar who broke the window?

• Why do you think the burglar took only the watch?

• Why would someone steal something? (prompt allowed)

• What will the family do now because of the burglary? (prompt

allowed)

• Should all theft be treated in the same way? (prompt allowed)

Coding of inference comprehension

Type of inference error Question Example

response

Failure of literal comprehension Why do you think the

burglar took only the

watch?"

cos he creeped in

Wrong inference: answer is

irrelevant in the context of the

story

How does the family

feel now?

feel better if go to

hospital

Immature inference: child links

question to own experience;

answer is relevant to the picture

but based on limited or immature

world knowledge

Why would someone

steal something?"

because they ain't

got a watch

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

7

Coding of inference comprehension

Type of inference error Question Example response

Odd inference: Unique or

unexpected given the story

premise or contained

excessive/irrelevant detail

Why was the dog

barking?

He was telling the truth

Because: minimal answer Because he did

Scope: response is along the right

lines, but either too specific or

vague

Why was the dog

barking?

Because someone

said “ow”

Lack of expressive ability:

answer is syntactically incomplete

or unintelligible

No response

Comprehension of CwLI and CwSLI• All CwLI

– Made significantly more literal comprehension errors or

failed to respond to inference questions than their SC

matched peers (didn’t understand the question).

• Suggests that CwLI cope less well with an IC task than

expected by their ability to comprehend isolated sentences

• CwSLI

– The CwSLI had significantly higher IC scores than CwPLI

– No significant differences between the types of

inferences that CwSLI and CwPLI made

Adams, C., Clarke, E., & Haynes, R. (2009). Inference and sentence comprehension in children with specific or pragmatic language impairments. International Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 301-318.

Comprehension of CwPLI

• CwPLI

– CwPLI to perform more poorly on

developmentally more complex inference items

– Did not make significantly more odd or wrong

inferences than CwSLI

– Had significantly lower inferential scores than

their CA and SC matched groups.

Adams, C., Clarke, E., & Haynes, R. (2009). Inference and sentence

comprehension in children with specific or pragmatic language impairments.

International Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 301-318.

Reading Comprehension in TD, ASD, ASD+LI

• Students with ASD without LI

answered more literal questions

correctly than TLD students, but

significantly fewer inferential

questions

• Students with ASD + Language

impairment answered the same

number of literal questions

correctly as TD students, but

significantly fewer inferential

questions correctly that students

with ASD + LI

Norbury, C., & Nation, K. (2011).

Understanding variability in reading

comprehension in adolescents with

autism spectrum disorders: Interactions

with language status and decoding skill.

Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(3),

191-210.

• Adolescents

• Nature stories that

did not include

social references

or emotional

content

TD & ASD Answering Literacy & Inferential Questions:

7-12 year olds• TD children and children with ASD with normal vocabulary and

syntax performed similarly

– Both groups answered a few more literal questions correctly than

inferential questions

• Children with LI

– Answered same number of literal questions correctly as TD children

and children with ASD without LI

– Answered significantly fewer inferential question correctly than TD

children and ASD children without LI

• Child with ASD + LI

– Answered significantly fewer literal and inferential questions than

children with LILucas, R., & Norbury, C.F. (2015). Making inferences from text: It’s vocabulary that

matters. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 58, 1224-1232.

Comprehension of physical causality, intentionality,

and emotions by persons with ASD

• Difficulty with all types of inferences, but

– Best performance on physical causality

• Errors may be related to difficult integrating world knowledge

with context/situation

– More errors on intentionality/mental states

– Most errors on emotion states

Bodner, K.E., Engelhardt, C.R., Minshew, N.J., & Williams, D.L. (2015). Making inferences: Comprehension of physical causality, intentionality, and emotions in discourse by high-functioning older children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(9),

2721-2733.

Andy was only 2 years old. He was sitting on his mother’s lap when a big dog ran

up and licked him on the check. Andy’s eyes got really big, and he started to cry.

Why did Andy do that?

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

8

Central Coherence vs Context Blindness

• Ability to derive overall meaning from a mass of

details

• A person with strong central coherence, looking at an

endless expanse of trees, would see “the forest.”

• A person with weak central coherence would see only

a whole lot of individual trees.

Inferences by 4-7 year olds (TD & ASD)

in narrative comprehension• It’s Susie’s birthday party tomorrow. Susie and her Mum go to the

supermarket to buy food for the party. Susie really hopes Mum buy her a

chocolate cake. They get a cake, some candy, and some chips. Then they

pay the cashier. Susie leaves the store smiling and feeling happy. And they

take the food home.

Nuske, H.J., & Bavin, E.L. (2011). Narrative comprehension in 4-7-year old children with autism: testing the weak central coherence account. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorder, 46, 108-119.

Question type Inference type Question Answer

Factual Where do they first go in

the story?

To the supermarket

Script Inductive Why did they give

money to the cashier?

To buy the food

Propositional deductive Why was Susie happy

when they left the store?

Her Mum bought a

chocolate cake.

Inferences by 4-7 year olds in narrative comprehension

• Children with ASD and typical children performed similarly

on factual and propositional questions

• Children with ASD performed less well on script inferences

than typically developing children

– Supports weak central coherence theory, i.e.,

problems integrating information to make script

inferences

– Propositional inferences require integrating

information within the text

Nuske, H.J., & Bavin, E.L. (2011). Narrative comprehension in 4-7-year old children with

autism: testing the weak central coherence account. International Journal of Language

and Communication Disorder, 46, 108-119.

What happens when you can’t retrieve the script

The procedure is quite simple. First you arrange items into different

groups. Of course one pile may be sufficient depending on how much

there is to do. If you have to go somewhere else due to lack of facilities

that is the next step; otherwise, you are pretty well set. It is important not

to overdo things. That is, it is better to do too few things at once than too

many. In the short run this may not seem important but complications can

easily arise. A mistake can be expensive as well. At first the whole

procedure will seem complicated. Soon, however, it will become just

another facet of life. It is difficult to foresee any end to the necessity for

this task in the immediate future, but then, one never can tell. After the

procedure is completed one arranges the materials into their appropriate

places. Eventually, they will be used once more and the whole cycle will

then have to be repeated. However, this is part of life.

Bransford, J.D., Johnson, M.K. (1972). Contextual perquisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726,

Category Induction in ASD

% of Group

Naigles, L.R., Kelley, E., Troy, E., & Fein, F. (2013). Residual difficulties with

categorical induction in children with a history of autism. J Autism Dev Disord.

43, 2048–2061.

TD Optimal HFA

Perfect 6/6 17.3 16.7 15.4

Almost perfect 5/6 52.2 27.8 23.1

Consistent 4/6 26.1 38.9 38.4

Moderate 3/6 4.3 16.7 15.4

Nonextender 0 0 7.7

Depth of Vocabulary and Inference Processing• Types of vocabulary measures

– Breadth of vocabulary: number of words known

– Depth of vocabulary: amount of knowledge about a word

• Particularly important to make inductive inferences

– Teacher, friends, play, learn, books, math --- school

– Type, keyboard, internet, email, printer, mouse ---

computer

• Depth of vocabulary affects inferences at global level even more

than at local levels

Oakhill, J., Cain, K., McCarthy, D. (2015). Inference processing in children: The

contributions of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge. In E. O’Brien, A. Cook, & R.

Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading. New York: Cambridge.

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

9

Concept Questions

• Who was Martin Luther King?

• What is racism?

• What is Washington, DC?

• What does “equal rights” mean to you?

Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J.S. (2011). Qualitative Reading Inventory-5.

Boston: Pearson.

Martin Luther King, Jr. – 5th Grade

• Explicit questions

– In some cities, what did blacks have to do on a city bus? (give up their seat)

– Why was Rosa Parks arrested? (she didn’t want to give up her seat)

– What did many people do to protest Rosa Park’s arrest? (don’t know)

– Name one way in which Martin Luther King was honored for his work. (a medal)

Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J.S. (2011). Qualitative Reading Inventory-5. Boston: Pearson.

Martin Luther King – 5th grade

• Implicit Questions

– What was Martin Luther King’s main goal? (change the law)

(relational inference - integrate across text)

– Why had people made laws separating blacks and whites? (don’t

know) (causal inference – prior knowledge)

– What happened when people refused to ride the buses? (lost

money ?? They had to change the law) (causal inference – across

the text)

– Why was Washington, D.C. an important place to protest unjust

laws? (the president lives there) (causal inference – prior

knowledge)

Types of Answers to QRI Questions

• Failure to link ideas across a passage – making relational inferences

• Failure to make causal inferences

• Failure to parse syntax

• Excessive elaboration or overreliance on prior knowledge

• Failure to know a key vocabulary word

• No response – did not answer

Dewitz, P., & Dewitz, P.K. (2003). They can read the words, but they can’tunderstand: Refining comprehension assessment. The Reading Teacher,56:5, 422-435.

Common Core Standards Requiring Inferences

Common Core

Standard

Inference

Type

Narrative Text Questions

Determine what

the text says

explicitly

Text evidence Using details from the text, what do the

topics of Ms. Rylant’s books tell us about

how she felt about animal.

Determine the

theme of the text

Theme What is the theme of the story so far? What

details in the story support the theme you’ve

chosen?

Describe/analyze

how

Text analysis Explain how events in Cynthia’s childhood

led her to write about being lonely and

needing love?

Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J.S. (2017). Qualitative reading inventory-6. Boston: Pearson.

Common Core Standards Requiring Inferences

Common

Core

Standard

Inference

Type

Narrative Text Questions

Interpret words

and phrases

as they are

used in text

Vocabulary in

context

What does “undeniable punch”

mean in the sentence, “her books

have undeniable punch?”

Explain how

an author

develops a

point of view

Point of view How did Cynthia’s point of view of

writers affect her view of herself

as a writer?

Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J.S. (2017). Qualitative reading inventory-6. Boston: Pearson.

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

10

Think Aloud Statements

Indicating Comprehension

• Paraphrases or summarizes what the author has said

• Making new meaning: makes an inference, draws a conclusion, or engages in reasoning

• Questioning that indicates understanding: asks a question based on understanding the text, e.g., questioning the motivation of a character

Think Aloud Statements

Indicating Comprehension

• Noting understanding: student recognizes that she or he understands what was read.

• Reporting prior knowledge: student reports a match with what was previously known or indicates that prior knowledge was absent or in conflict with the text

• Identifying personally: relates the text to personal experiences, makes a judgment of some sort on the basis of personal experiences, states interest or lack of it, or indicates like or dislike for a topic.

Think Aloud Statements

Indicating Lack of Comprehension

• Questioning content: asks questions about

character motivation or the applications of a

concept that indicate lack of understanding. The

student also asks about the meaning of words or

concepts.

• Noting lack of understanding: clearly states that

she or he is confused about something.

Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2017). Qualitative reading inventory-6. New York: Longman.

Factors common to those adept at inferring

• Being an active reader who wants to make

sense of text

• Competent working memory

• Monitoring comprehension

• Rich vocabulary

• Wide background knowledge

• Sharing same cultural background as that

assumed by text

What to do to Develop Inferring

• Activate prior knowledge/build knowledge

• Develop vocabulary/syntactic structures

• Develop theory of mind

• Teach questioning

• Teach summarizing

Metacognitive Processes

• Knowledge of the factors that influence one’s own performance

• Knowing different types of strategies to use

• Knowledge about why and when to use a given strategy.

Knowledge of Cognition

• Planning, monitoring, and regulating learning

• Evaluating one’s own regulation; assessing results and strategies used

Regulation of Cognition

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

11

What’s more precious than rubies, more lasting than gold?

What can never be traded, stolen, or sold?

What comes with great effort and takes time, but then,

Once yours, will serve you again and again.

Raisel’s RiddleBuild Vocabulary Depth

• Identify important words in the passage

• Activate important facts about those words

• Reason about those facts, computing relationships

among the words

Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (1998). Facilitating knowledge-based inferences

in less skilled readers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 142-172.

Expanding Expression ToolPenguin

What group does it belong to? Animal, bird

What does it do? What do you

do with it?

Swims, doesn’t fly, eat fish

What color, size, shape is it? Black and white, different sizes

What is it made of or come

from?

??

What are its parts? What parts

go with it?

Bill/beak, feathers, webbed feet

Where do you find it? Many live in Antarctica; some live in South

Africa, Australia, New Zealand; also zoos

Other knowledge about it Seals eat penguins; I’ve read stories

about Tacky the Penguin

Dan heard the door

open and wondered

who had arrived. He

couldn’t make out the

voices. Then he

recognized the

XXXXXX footsteps on

the stairs and knew it

was Aunt Grace.

Dan heard the door

open and wondered

who had arrived. He

couldn’t make out the

voices. Then he

recognized the

lumbering footsteps on

the stairs and knew it

was Aunt Grace.

Nondirective Vocabulary Context

General Vocabulary Context

Joe and Stan arrived at the party at 7 o’clock. By 9:30, the evening seemed to drag for Stan. But Joe really seemed to be having a good time at the party. “I wish I could be as XXXXXXX as he is,” thought Stan.

Joe and Stan arrived at the party at 7 o’clock. By 9:30, the evening seemed to drag for Stan. But Joe really seemed to be having a good time at the party. “I wish I could be as gregarious as he is,” thought Stan.

General Contexts that enable inferring of meaning

• Murderers are usually incarcerated for longer

periods of time than robbers.

• Ben is fearless, but his brother is timorous.

• Dad gave credence to my story, but Mom’s reaction

was one of total disbelief

• When we invite the Paulsons for dinner, they never

invite us to their home for a meal; however, when

we have the Browns to dinner, they always

reciprocate.

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

12

Cloze treatment: Inferring vocabulary

• Integrate background knowledge and text information to generate inferences

– The car skidded out of control and crashed through the railing over

the _______. (using semantic, syntactic, and world knowledge)

– The car skidded out of control and crashed through the railing over

the ______. The boat below was halfway under the bridge and missed

being hit. (use information subsequent to the cloze blank)

– It had rained and there was still no grass by the new house. The dogs

were rolling in the mud and spreading dirt everywhere. The girl ran to

catch her dog and slipped in the ______. (refer to information

previous to the blank)

Dewitz, P., Carr, E., & Patberg, J. (1987). Effects of inference training on comprehension

and comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 99-121.

Teaching Vocabulary

Word Dictionary

Definition

Friendly Definition

devious straying from the

right course; not

straightforward

If someone is devious, he is using

tricky and secretive ways to do

something dishonest

pungent sharply affecting the

organs of taste or

smell, as if by a

penetrating power;

biting; acrid.

Something that is pungent has a

smell or taste that is very sharp

and strong, sometimes so strong it

is unpleasant

Sentences using dictionary definitions

• He was devious on his bike.

• The dog was pungent the bone.

• The student made a capricious on her math test.

• Jim has a smirk on his face.

Vocabulary instruction

• Contextualize word for its role in the story

• Have children repeat word so they create a phonological representation

• Explain the meaning of the word

• Give examples in contexts other than the story.

• Children provide their own examples

• Children say word again to reinforce its phonological representation

Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life. New York: Guilford.

Evaluating Vocabulary Knowledge

Red Zone

Red-light

words

Yellow Zone

Yellow-light words

Green Zone

Green-light

words

I don’t know

the word

I understand

the general

meaning of the

word but can’

use it

I can give

examples of

the word

I can define

the word

I know the

word well and

can use the

word meaning

I need to stop

and use

clarifying

strategies

I need to slow down and check my

comprehension

I can read at

the speed limit

Lubliner, S. (2005). Getting into words: Vocabulary instruction that strengthens comprehension. Baltimore: Brookes.

Learning Multiple Meaning Words

• Many English words have multiple meanings

• Children with language impairments (LI) have fewer

meanings for words

• Children with LI frequently have difficulty retrieving

word meanings

• Ability to rapidly retrieve word meanings promotes

comprehension

Nelson, J.R., & Marchand-Martella, N. (2005). The multiple meaning vocabulary program.

Boston, MA: Sopris West.

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

13

Multiple meaning words: innocent

• Not guilty of an offense

– Blameless: Stanley was blameless of the robbery.

– Guiltless: The court did not find Stanley guiltless.

– In the clear: Stanley’s social worker proved that he was in the clear.

• Not experienced

– Naïve: Stanley was naïve about the functioning of the court.

– Unsophisticated: Stanley’s unsophisticated parents did not the implications of sending Stanley to Camp Green Lake.

– Unaware: Zero was unaware that the sploosh would make him sick.

Multiple meaning words: innocent

• Not dangerous or harmful

– Harmless: A yellow-spotted lizard is not harmless.

– Risk free: Being sent to Camp Green Lake was not risk free.

– Playful: Sometimes the boys argued in a playful manner.

Multiple meaning words:

Match the sentence to its meaning

• not guilty of an offense

• not experienced

• not dangerous or

harmful

• Stanley thought his comment

was innocent, but it made

Zero very angry.

• Stanley was a really good

kid; he was too innocent to

be with boys who were real

bullies.

• Stanley’s parents knew

Stanley was innocent of

stealing the shoes.

Is the word used as expected?

• When Zero confessed to stealing the shoes, he

proved he was innocent.

• Stanley’s teaching Zero to read was an innocent

activity.

• X-ray really knew how to survive in at Camp Green

Lake. He was the boy’s leader because he was so

innocent.

• The social worker knew Stanley was innocent

because he was in school when the shoes were

taken.

Wordsift Cloud (www.wordsift.org

What does the word cloud suggest this article is about?

What seem to be the most important words?

How do these words go together?

https://wordart.com/create

• The black widow spider

– Widow, prey, poisonous, scamper, fluid

• The American colonies

– colony, independence, migrate, settlers, trade

• Whales

– Adapt, agile, depths, docile, frolic, glide, tragic,

treacherous, vicious

Teach Vocabulary in Thematic groups

Bowers, L. (2011). Word feast elementary. Pro-Ed: Austin, TX.

Johnson, P. (2011). Word feast middleschool. Pro-Ed: Austin, TX.

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

14

SERP Word Generation Program

• Program to teach academic vocabulary language,

discussion, argumentation, and thinking skills to students

in 4th-8th grades

• Words are taught in multiple contexts over 5-10 lessons

• Available free: http://wordgen.serpmedia.org

Teach Vocabulary in Thematic groups Most Common Prefixes: Grades 3-4

un- pre-

re- inter-

in-, im-, ir, il-(not) fore-

dis- de-

en-, em- trans-

non- super-

in-, im- (in or into) semi-

over-(too much) anti-

mis- mid-

sub- under-

Teaching Suffixes

-er definitions and examples

“more”

(comparative adjective)

“one who”

(noun)

“that which”

(noun)

stronger

thicker

softer

teacher

traveler

pitcher

toaster

washer

hanger

Ebbers, S.M. (2011). Vocabulary through morphemes: Suffixes, prefixes,

and roots for intermediate grades. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.

-ly definitions and examples

“In a manner that

is” (adverb)

“Like a (noun)”

(adjective)

Time-related

adverbs

Time-related

adjectives

kindly (“in a

manner that is

kind”)

speaks kindly

sisterly (“like a

sister”)

a sisterly hug

suddenly

suddenly faints

daily (once a

day) daily

vitamins

quietly

firmly

sweetly

courageously

friendly

kingly

motherly

beggerly

periodically

instantly

eternally

constantly

weekly

monthly

annually

Ebbers, S.M. (2011). Vocabulary through morphemes: Suffixes, prefixes, and

roots for intermediate grades. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.

Morphology Grades 5-6• Greek and Latin word roots

– Most common Greek roots: tela (far, distant); therm(heat); photo (light)

– Move to Latin roots with aim to gain understanding of a few frequently occurring roots: tract (drag, pull); spect (look); spect (look); port (carry), dict (say), rupt(to break); scrib (to write)

• Greek and Latin prefixes

– E.g., inter-(between); intra- (within); post- (after); pro-(in front of, forward); co-.com-con- (together); sub-(under); pre- (before); anti- (against)

Ebbers, S.M. (2004). Vocabulary through morphemes: Suffixes, prefixes,

and roots for intermediate grades. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.

Somebody Wanted/Because But So

Percy to stop Medusa

because she could

stop him from

finding the lightning

thief

if he looked at her

when he swung his

sword he would be

turned to stone

he looked at her

reflection in a

mirror and swung

his sword behind

him

Syntax for expressing inferences/interpetations

Who When Emotion Why

Percy When Annabeth warned

Percy that Aunty Em is

Medusa

Terrified he knew Medusa

could turn him into

stone

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

15

Question-Answer-Relationships• Where is the answer?

– Right there!Words are right there in the text

• Where is the answer?– Think and search!

Words are in the text, but not spelled out for you. Think about what the author is saying.

• Where is the answer?– You and the author!

Think about what you have learned and what is in the text.• Where is the answer?

– On your own!– Answer is in you head.

Raphael, T.E. (1986). Teaching question/answer relationships, revisited. The Reading Teacher, 39, 516-522.

QAR (Question-Answer-Response)

Passage to Freedom: The Sugihara Story

• Right there

– Why were the Sugihara family living in Lithuania?

• Think and search

– In what ways did Hiroki’s life change after the Polish Jews came to his house?

• Author and you

– What is a visa?

– Why didn’t Mrs. Sugihara help write the visas?

• On you own

– Can you think of someone else who has risked his or her own life to save other persons?

Landscape of Action Landscape of Consciousness

• What characters do

• How they do it

Mrs. Pig called for a

babysitter.

Mrs. Pig opened the door.

The babysitter is a wolf.

The babysitter it holding

an umbrella.

• What characters feel and think.

• Why they feel and think as they do?

• Making judgments about the

characters

Mrs. Pig doesn’t know it’s a wolf.

The wolf is tricking Mrs. Pig. The wolf

wants to eat the piglets.

The baby pigs are scared, so they’re

running.

Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible

worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Emotional Thermometers

Petrified

Hysterical

Terrified

Scared/frightened

Startled

Unnerved

Disturbed

Dismayed

Angry

Annoyed

Bothered

Enraged

Incensed

Livid/furious

Aggravated

Irritated

Provoked

Predicting Dialogue & Thoughts

She’ll be pleased with how

I’m handling the boys and

reward me.

There’s been a little

trouble on the lake.

Caveman will tell

you about it.

I don’t care

what the boys

do as long as

they find the

treasure

Picture of

Mr. SirPicture of

the Warden

Mr. Sir isn’t

doing his job.

He’s got to learn

what I want!

That’s why you

brought him here?Observations

Stanley in hole

Lizards with yellow spots on him

Lizards aren’t biting him

Seems to be looking up at someone

Doesn’t look happy

Old chest in background

Many lizards on chest

InferencesMaybe the chest is really

important; Stanley was told to

look for things in the holes.

Why aren’t the lizards biting; is

something protecting him?

Maybe he’s looking at the warden,

cause she wanted him to find

something.

Maybe the chest is what the

warden had been looking for.

The warden can’t get the chest

‘cause the lizards are on it.

Won’t be able to get what’s in the

chest

Nokes, J.D. (2008). The observation/inference chart:

Improving students’ abilities to make inferences while reading nontraditional texts. Journal of Adolescent &

Adult Literacy, 51:7, 538-546.

Photo of Stanley in a

hole he has been

digging

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

16

Observation/Inference Rubric

• Observations

1.Few observations

2.Many observations but not specific or detailed

3.Many observations including ones that are specific and detailed

• Inferences linked to observations

1.Some inferences but they are not based on observations

2.Bases inferences on observations but does not show the relationship

3.Bases inferences on observation and shows the relationship

Nokes, J.D. (2008). The observation/inference chart: Improving students’ abilities to make inferences

while reading nontraditional texts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51:7, 538-546.

Observation/Inference Rubric

• Inferences

1.Makes few inferences or inferences that have no basis

2.Several good inferences, but explanations may be fairly obvious

3.Many good inferences, including ones that show depth of thinking

Nokes, J.D. (2008). The observation/inference chart: Improving students’ abilities to make inferences

while reading nontraditional texts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51:7, 538-546.

Inner-Outer Prediction Chart

Character Outer Prediction

(Events,

Actions,

Relationships

Why?

(Evidence)

Inner Predictions

(Personality,

Maturity, Learning,

Emotions)

Why? (Evidence)

Zero He’ll keep

running and

won’t die.

He’s pretty smart

even though people

think he isn’t.

He’ll be scared, but

he’ll be glad to be

out of camp

He doesn’t know

where he’s going,

but there won’t be

people calling him

stupid

The warden She’ll just let

Zero go

She’s knows he’ll

have to come back

cause he doesn’t

have water

She doesn’t

Stanley He’ll go after

Zero

He’s Zero’s friend;

Zero’s dug holes for

Stanley and Stanley

taught Zero to read

He’s worried that

Zero will be dead

It’s been 2 days and

Zero didn’t have

any water with him

Zero has run off into the desertPerspectives

Stanley Events Mr. Sir

Thirsty, thinks Mr. Sir is

offering him a drink

Arriving at Camp Green

Lake

Intends to taunt

Stanley by drinking in

front of him

Worried cause boys

threw seeds in his

hole. Lies to protect

friends

Stanley says he stole

Mr. Sir’s sunflower

seeds

Doesn’t believe

Stanley. Decides to

have warden deal with

him.

Frightened – what

might the warden do to

him

Warden scratches Mr.

Sir

Surprised, angry;

didn’t expect this

PerspectivesStanley Events Mr. Sir

Disappointed they’re

not going after Zero,

then worried

Zero runs off.

Warden/Mr. Sir don’t go

after Zero; destroy

Zero’s records

Indifferent to Zero; just

don’t want anyone to

know he went missing

Wants to save Zero;

frustrated & scared,

but determined when

truck falls in hole

Stanley runs the truck in

a hole; then runs off into

the desert

Initially furious; then

worried if someone

discovers he’s missing

Relieved that they

haven’t been bitten

and that they may be

rescued

Stanley and Zero in

hole with lizards, but

lizards haven’t bitten;

lawyer arrives

Apprehensive about

what lawyer will ask

and what she knows

about him

Reasons for Limited Character Inferences

• Focusing on what’s happening not why

• Thinking that story characters are just like them

• Focusing on only a small part of the story

• Focusing on the main character’s perspective

only

Emery, D.W. (1996). Helping readers comprehend stories from the

characters' perspective. The Reading Teacher, 49, 534-541.

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

17

Coping with Inferencing Difficulties

• When students focus on what happened instead of why

– Why did A act in this way?

– How is A feeling now?

Emery, D.W. (1996). Helping readers comprehend stories from the

characters' perspective. The Reading Teacher, 49, 534-541.

Coping with Inferencing Difficulties

• When students misinterpret character’s feelings and thoughts because they are considering only their own perspective

– Is that the way you would have felt?

– Is what way is (character) different from you?

– Since the character is different in this way, how do you think the character felt?

– Let me reread some of the parts that may help us understand why the character might respond differently than you would.

Emery, D.W. (1996). Helping readers comprehend stories from the characters' perspective. The Reading Teacher, 49, 534-541.

Coping with Inferencing Difficulties

• When students’ replies are inadequate because they are focusing on only one part of the story instead of the whole

– What else might the character want?…be thinking? be feeling?

– Think about the part where the character did X and Y at the beginning.

– What does that tell you about what the character might be thinking now?

Emery, D.W. (1996). Helping readers comprehend stories from the characters'

perspective. The Reading Teacher, 49, 534-541.

Coping with Inferencing Difficulties

• When students consider only one character’s perspective

– We mentioned A. What about B? How is B feeling?

– What did A believe that B was thinking/feeling/wanting?

– What did B believe that A was thinking/feeling/wanting

– When A did that, how did A think B would react?

– What was A believing about B when A did that?

Emery, D.W. (1996). Helping readers comprehend stories from the characters'

perspective. The Reading Teacher, 49, 534-541.

Think-alouds to promote infering

Promote

• Intrapersonal ToM

– Reflecting on what one knows/doesn’t know;

understands/ doesn’t understand; what one

can or can not understand

• Interpersonal ToM

– Inferring what characters are thinking, feeling

Think Aloud

“From the

title I think

this will be

about...”

Strategies to Build

Inferential Comprehension

Students read silently as teacher reads aloud

Teacher thinks through tricky spots

Make predictions from

book title and cover

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

18

“I have a picture of this scene in my head and this

is what it looks like....”

Teacher thinks through more difficult parts of the text and

Think Aloud

Outside the storm grew worse. Still shaking, Ben picked up the receiver and held it to his good ear. He hesitated then

dialed the number. He slid the bookmark between the pages of the book.

Describes the pictures you form in

your head about the information.

Think Aloud

The description on the wolf exhibit at the museum says the scene is at the margin of Gunflint Lake, MN. I remember at the beginning of this book that Ben is from there. Had the person who created this exhibit been at Gunflint Lake. Maybe it was the Daniel that Ben is looking for.

Make connections explicit: Show how to link prior

information stated in the text to new information in

text. “I remember about....and now….”

Demonstrate fix-up strategies: Show how to make sense of the passage. “I’d better reread.” or “I’ll read ahead and see if I can get some more information.”

Think Aloud

After you complete reading and Think Aloud, encourage students to add their own thoughts to yours.

Questioning the Author• Addresses text as product of fallible author

• Some types of queries

– What is the author trying to say here? What is the author

talking about?

• I know that’s what the author said, but what did the author

mean?

– What do you think the author wants us to know?

– Does this make sense with what the author told us before?

– How does this connect to what the author told us earlier?

– Why do you think the author tells us this now?

– How does the author let us know something has changed?

Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G. (2006). Improving comprehension with questioning the author. New York:

Scholastic.

Reciprocal Teaching

• Prediction

• Questioning

• Clarification

• Summarization

Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of

comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring

activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.

Predict Question

Use cues from the text or

illustrations to predict what

will happen next

•I think…because…

•I’ll bet…because…

•I suppose …because…

•I think I will

learn…because…

Ask questions as you

read. Some are answered

in the book and others are

inferred

•I wonder…

•Who? What? When?

Where? Why? How?

•Why do you think?

Reciprocal Teaching

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

19

Clarify Summarize

Reciprocal Teaching

Clarify

How can you figure out

tricky or hard words and

ideas?

I didn’t get the (word, idea)

so…

•Reread

•Read on

•Sound words out

•Ask if it makes sense

•Talk to a friend

Summarization

Using your own words, tell

the main ideas from the text

in order

This text is about…

This part is about…

First…

Next…

Then…

Finally

Promoting Predicting

• Model predictions using think-alouds and text cues

• Ask students to preview illustrations and headings

and think about what they will learn from text

• Use what you know about text structure to predict

• Periodically summarize what has happened so far

and add, “Now I think… because….”

Oczkus, L.D. (2010). Reciprocal Teaching at work. Newark, DE:

International Reading Association.

Promoting Clarifying

• Model words and ideas to clarify

• Use the prompt “I don’t get the [word, idea, chapter] so I…”

• Require students to provide an example (if they have

nothing to clarify, ask them to select a word/idea a younger

student might have trouble with)

• Give students a copy of text and having students underline

words to clarify in one color and sentences to clarify in

another

Oczhus, L.D. (2010). Reciprocal teaching at work. Newark, DE: International

Reading Association.

Promoting Questioning

• Model how to formulate different types of questions

• Modeling higher level questions that require using

textual cues and prior knowledge

• Asking students to reflect: How does this question

help us understand the text

• Providing question starters, e.g., “Why do you

think…?

Oczkus, L.D. (2010). Reciprocal Teaching at work. Newark, DE:

International Reading Association.

Question Types

• Zwiers, J. (2010). Building

reading comprehension

habits in grades 6-12: A

toolkit of classroom

activities. Newark, DE:

International Reading

Association

• On the surface

– Who, what, when, where

• Under the surface

– How, why, what if, would

• On the sea floor: Life

application

– Opinions, how does this

text relate to real life

Promoting SummarizingSummarizing =/= retelling

Retell

Summary

ThemeMain Idea

Carol Westby

Copyright © 2017 C. Westby

Annual Social Thinking Global Providers’ Conference

June 23, 2017

20

The three little pigs

wanted to build their own

houses,

but a wolf kept blowing them

down one at a time.

So, each piggy escaped to his

brother’s house for safety.

In the end, all three pigs were

safe in the last pig’s brick house.

The five finger narrative summary

• Somebody

• Wanted

• But

• So

• In the end

Metacognition

We’ve got metacognition, running through our mind.

We’ve got metacognition and it isn’t hard to find.

Can’t you hear our thoughts a calling

Listen to our song.

We’ve got metacognition.

Learning all day long.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvyZsSQ3ul4


Recommended