+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CASE 3. Merck and River Blindness - UNCG...

CASE 3. Merck and River Blindness - UNCG...

Date post: 29-May-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
The Purpose of the Corporation 101 CASE 3. Merck and River Blindness Merck & Co., Inc. is one of the world's largest pharmaceutical products and services com- panies. Headquartered in Whitehouse Station, NewJersey, Merck has over 70,000 employees and sells products and services in approxi- mately 150 countries. Merck had revenues of $47,715,700,000 in 2001, ranked 24th on the 2002 Fortune 500 list of America's largest com- panies, 62nd on the Global 500 list of the World's Largest Corporations, and 82nd on the Fortune 100 list of the Best Companies to Work For. In the late 1970s Merck research scientists discovered a potential cure for a severely debil- itating human disease known as river blindness (onchocerciasis). The disease is caused by a par- asite that enters the body through the bite of black flies that breed on the rivers of Africa and Latin America. The parasite causes severe itch- ing, disfiguring skin infections, and, finally, total and permanent blindness. In order to demon- strate that it was safe and effective, the drug needed to undergo expensive clinical trials. Ex- ecutives were concerned because they knew that those who would benefit from using it could not afford to pay for the drug, even if it was sold at cost. However, Merck research scientists argued that the drug was far too promising from a med- ical standpoint to abandon. Executives relented and a seven-year clinical trial proved the drug both efficacious and safe. A single annual dose of Mectizan, the name Merck gave to the drug, kills the parasites inside the body as well as the flies that carry the parasite. Once Mectizan was approved for human use, Merck executives explored third-party pay- ment options with the World Health Organi- zation, the U.S. Agency for International Development, and the U.S. Department of State without success. Four United States Sen- ators went so far as to introduce legislation to provide U.S. funding for the worldwide dis- tribution of Mectizan. However, their efforts were unsuccessful, no legislation was passed and, and no U.S. government funding was made available. Finally, Merck executives de- cided to manufacture and distribute the drug for free. Since 1987, Merck has manufactured and distributed over 700 million tablets of Mecti- zan at no charge. The company's decision was grounded in its core values: 1. Our business is preserving and improving human life. 2. We are committed to the highest standards of ethics and integrity. 3. We are dedicated to the highest level of scien- tific excellence and commit our research to improving human and animal health and the quality of life. 4. We expect profits, but only from work that satisfies customer needs and benefits humanity. 5. We recognize that the ability to excel—to most competitively meet society's and customers' needs—depends on the integrity, knowledge, imagination, skill, diversity, and teamwork of employees, and we value these qualities most highly. This case was prepared by Denis G. Arnold and is based on Erik Eckholm, "River Blindness; Conquering an Ancient Scourge," The New York Times, January 8, 1989; David Pilling, "Public Private Health Deal Aims to End Elephantiasis," The Financial Times (London), January 21, 2000; Karen Lowry Miller, "The Pill Machine," Newsweek, November 19, 2001; "The Merck Mectizan Donation Program," www.merck.com/about/cr/policies_performance/social/mecti- zan_donation.html (03 October 2002); "The Story of Mectizan," www.merck.com/about/cr/mectizan/ (03 October 2002); "MERCKAnnual Report 2001" http://www.anrpt2001.com/index.html (03 October 2002); "About Merck: Mis- sion Statement," www.merck.com/about/mission.html (03 October 2002); "The 2002 Fortune 500," www.fortune.com/ lists/F500/index.html (03 October 2002); "The 2002 Global 500," www.fortune.com/lists/G500/index.html (03 October 2002); and "Best Companies to Work For," http://www.fortune.com/lists/bestcompanies/index.html www.fortune. com/lists/F500/index.html (03 October 2002). © Denis G. Arnold 2003, 2008.
Transcript
Page 1: CASE 3. Merck and River Blindness - UNCG Onlinelearn.uncg.edu/courses/phi361/readings/Case-River... · 2018-03-29 · $47,715,700,000 in 2001, ranked 24th on the 2002 Fortune 500

The Purpose of the Corporation 101

CASE 3. Merck and River Blindness

Merck & Co., Inc. is one of the world's largest pharmaceut ica l p roduc ts and services com­panies. Headquartered in Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, Merck has over 70,000 employees a n d sells p roduc t s a n d services in approxi­mately 150 countries. Merck had revenues of $47,715,700,000 in 2001, ranked 24th on the 2002 Fortune 500 list of America's largest com­panies , 62nd on the Global 500 list of the World's Largest Corporat ions, and 82nd on the For tune 100 list of the Best Companies to Work For.

In the late 1970s Merck research scientists discovered a potential cure for a severely debil­itating human disease known as river blindness (onchocerciasis). The disease is caused by a par­asite that enters the body through the bite of black flies that breed on the rivers of Africa and Latin America. The parasite causes severe itch­ing, disfiguring skin infections, and, finally, total and permanent blindness. In order to demon­strate that it was safe and effective, the drug needed to undergo expensive clinical trials. Ex­ecutives were concerned because they knew that those who would benefit from using it could not afford to pay for the drug, even if it was sold at cost. However, Merck research scientists argued that the drug was far too promising from a med­ical standpoint to abandon. Executives relented and a seven-year clinical trial proved the drug both efficacious and safe. A single annual dose of Mectizan, the name Merck gave to the drug, kills the parasites inside the body as well as the flies that carry the parasite.

Once Mectizan was approved for h u m a n use, Merck executives explored third-party pay­m e n t options with the World Heal th Organi­zation, the U.S. Agency for In te rna t iona l Deve lopment , a n d the U.S. D e p a r t m e n t of State without success. Four Uni ted States Sen­ators went so far as to in t roduce legislation to provide U.S. funding for the worldwide dis­tribution of Mectizan. However, their efforts were unsuccessful, n o legislation was passed and , and n o U.S. gove rnmen t fund ing was made available. Finally, Merck executives de­cided to manufacture and distribute the drug for free.

Since 1987, Merck has manufactured and distributed over 700 million tablets of Mecti­zan at no charge. The company's decision was g rounded in its core values:

1. Our business is preserving and improving human life.

2. We are committed to the highest standards of ethics and integrity.

3. We are dedicated to the highest level of scien­tific excellence and commit our research to improving human and animal health and the quality of life.

4. We expect profits, but only from work that satisfies customer needs and benefits humanity.

5. We recognize that the ability to excel—to most competitively meet society's and customers' needs—depends on the integrity, knowledge, imagination, skill, diversity, and teamwork of employees, and we value these qualities most highly.

This case was prepared by Denis G. Arnold and is based on Erik Eckholm, "River Blindness; Conquering an Ancient Scourge," The New York Times, January 8, 1989; David Pilling, "Public Private Health Deal Aims to End Elephantiasis," The Financial Times (London), January 21, 2000; Karen Lowry Miller, "The Pill Machine," Newsweek, November 19, 2001; "The Merck Mectizan Donation Program," www.merck.com/about/cr/policies_performance/social/mecti-zan_donation.html (03 October 2002); "The Story of Mectizan," www.merck.com/about/cr/mectizan/ (03 October 2002); "MERCKAnnual Report 2001" http://www.anrpt2001.com/index.html (03 October 2002); "About Merck: Mis­sion Statement," www.merck.com/about/mission.html (03 October 2002); "The 2002 Fortune 500," www.fortune.com/ lists/F500/index.html (03 October 2002); "The 2002 Global 500," www.fortune.com/lists/G500/index.html (03 October 2002); and "Best Companies to Work For," http://www.fortune.com/lists/bestcompanies/index.html www.fortune. com/lists/F500/index.html (03 October 2002). © Denis G. Arnold 2003, 2008.

Page 2: CASE 3. Merck and River Blindness - UNCG Onlinelearn.uncg.edu/courses/phi361/readings/Case-River... · 2018-03-29 · $47,715,700,000 in 2001, ranked 24th on the 2002 Fortune 500

102 The Purpose of the Corporation

George W. Merck, the company's president from 1925 to 1950, summarized these values when he wrote, "medicine is for the people. It is not for the profits. The profits follow, and if we have remembered that, they have never failed to appear. The better we have remem­bered that, the larger they have been."

Today, the Merck Mectizan Donation Pro­gram includes partnerships with numerous nongovernmental organizations, govern­mental organizations, private foundations, the World Health Organization, The World Bank, UNICEF, and the United Nations De­velopment Program. In 1998, Merck ex­panded the Mectizan Donation Program to include the prevention of elephantiasis (lym­phatic filariasis) in African countries where the disease coexists with river blindness. In total, approximately 30 million people in 32 countries are now treated annually with Mec­tizan. Merck reports that it has no idea how much the entire program has cost, but estimates that each pill is worth $1.50. The United

Nations reports that river blindness may soon be eradicated.

Questions

1. Given the fact that Merck is spending cor­porate resources to manufacture and dis­tribute Mectizan, is the Merck Mectizan Donation Program morallyjustifiable? Ex­plain.

2. Would Friedman approve of the Merck Mectizan Donation Program? Explain.

3. Should the fact that Merck's values are clearly stated in corporate publications that are widely available to investors make a dif­ference to someone who accepts Fried­man's position? Explain.

4. Should the Merck Mectizan Donation Pro­gram serve as a model for other pharma­ceutical companies who are in a unique position to facilitate the eradication of other diseases in the developing nations? Explain.

CASE 4. H. B. Fuller in Honduras: Street Children and Substance Abuse

Kativo Chemical Industries, a wholly owned foreign subsidiary of H. B. Fuller, sells a solvent-based adhesive (glue) in several countries in Latin America. The brand name of the glue is Resistol. In 1985 it came to H. B. Fuller's at­tention that large numbers of street children in the Central American country of Honduras were sniffing glue and that Resistol was among the glues being abused. Indeed all these

children who sniff glue are being referred to as Resistoleros.

Resistol has a number of industrial uses, al­though one of its primary uses is in small shoe repair shops. The glue has properties that are not possible to attain with a water-based for­mula. These properties include rapid set, strong adhesion, and water resistance. Resistol is similar to airplane glue.

This case is based on a much longer case with the same name authored by Norman E. Bowie and Stefanie Lenway. The full "H. B. Fuller in Honduras: Street Children and Substance Abuse" was the Case award winner in the Columbia Uni­versity Graduate School of Business Ethics in Business Program.


Recommended