CASE I. • 40 years old male, car accident. • Several fractures, hematothorax.
• Treatment in sufficient progress (OR). • No active bleeding. No coagulopathy.
• No relevant medical history.
At what Hemoglobin concentration (cHb) do you transfuse red cells?
A = ≤ 7.0 B = ≤ 8.0 C = ≤ 9.0 D = ≤ 10.0 g/dl
CASE II.• 80 years old female.
• Hemihepatectomy for cancer treatment. • No active bleeding. No coagulopathy.
• Adequate mental conditions. No cardiac history.
At what Hemoglobin concentration (cHb) do you transfuse red cells?
A = ≤ 7.0 B = ≤ 8.0 C = ≤ 9.0 D = ≤ 10.0 g/dl
Red Cell TransfusionRed Cell Transfusion
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Ch
ang
e in
%
cHb Oxygensupply
Lactate TissueOxygenation
Initial Data: cHb 7.23 g/dl, Lactate 4.35 mmol/l
Sepsis patients (21): one hour after Red Cell transfusion
Sadaka F et al.: Ann Intens Care 2011;1:46
Vamvakas EC, Blajchman MA.Transfus Med Rev 2010;(2)24:77
“Blood still kills!”
Wiriya MaisatArraya Watanitanon Benno von Bormann
Anesthesiology, Siriraj Hospital
Transfusion of red cells 1. Outcome, 2. Benefit, 3. Alternatives
3rd July 2012
I. Outcome
………………...16. Offner PJ, Moore EE, Biffl WL, et al: Increased rate of infection associated with transfusion of old blood after severe injury. Arch Surg 2002; 137:711–716, 17. Zallen G, Offner PJ, Moore EE, et al: Age of transfused blood is an independent risk factor for postinjury multiple organ failure. Am J Surg 1999; 178:570–572 18. Claridge JA, Sawyer RG, Schulman AM, et al: Blood transfusions correlate with infectionsin trauma patients in a dose-dependent manner. Am Surg 2002; 68:566–572 19. Malone DL, Dunne J, Tracy JK, et al: Blood transfusion, independent of shock severity, is associated with worse outcome in trauma. J Trauma 2003; 54:898–905 20. Dunne JR, Malone DL, Tracy JK, et al: Allogenic blood transfusion in the first 24 hours after trauma is associated with increased systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and death. Surg Infect 2004; 5:395–404 21. Silverboard H, Aisiku I, Martin GS, et al: The role of acute blood transfusion in the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with severe trauma. J Trauma 2005; 59:717–723 22. Croce MA, Tolley EA, Claridge JA, et al: Transfusions result in pulmonary morbidity and death after a moderate degree of injury. J Trauma 2005; 59:19–2323. Ciesla DJ, Moore EE, Johnson JL, et al: A 12-year prospective study of postinjury multiple organ failure: Has anything changed?Arch Surg 2005; 140:432–438 24. Dawes LG, Aprahamian C, Condon RE, et al: The risk of infection after colon injury. Surgery1986; 100:796–803 25. Tartter PI: Blood transfusion and infectious complications following colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 1988; 75:789–792 26. van Lawick van Pabst WP, Langenhorst BL, Mulder PG, et al: Effect of perioperative blood lo ss and perioperative blood transfusions on colorectal cancer survival. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1988; 24:741–747 27. Wobbes T, Bemelmans BL, Kuypers JH, et al:Risk of postoperative septic complications after abdominal surgical treatment in relation to perioperative blood transfusion. Surg GynecolObstet 1990; 171:59–62 28. von Doersten P, Cruz RM, Selby JV, et al: Transfusion, recurrence, and infection in head and neck cancer surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 106:60–67 29. Jahnson S, Andersson M: Adverse effects of perioperative blood transfusion in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg 1992; 158: 419–425 30. Vignali A, Braga M, Dionigi P, et al: Impact of a program of autologous blood donation on the incidence of infection in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg 1995; 161:487–492 31. Ford CD, VanMoorleghem G, Menlove RL: Blood transfusions and postoperative wound infection. Surgery 1993; 113:603–607 32. Mynster T, Nielsen HJ: The impact of storage time of transfused blood on postoperative infectious complications in rectal cancer surgery. Scan J Gastroenterol 2000; 35:212–217 33. Mynster T, Christensen IJ, Moesgaard F, et al: Effects of the combination of blood transfusion and postoperative infectious complications on prognosis after surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2000; 87:1553–1562 34. Chang H, Hall GA, Geerts WH, et al: Allogeneic red blood cell transfusion is an independent risk factor for the development of postoperative bacterial infection. Vox Sang 2000;78:13–18 35. Lebron-Gallardo M, Herrera Gutierrez ME, Seller PG, et al: Risk factors for renal dysfunction in the postoperative course ofliver transplant. Liver Transpl 2004; 10:1379 –1385 36. Vamvakas EC, Carven JH: Transfusion and postoperative pneumonia in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Effect of the length of storage of transfused red cells. Transfusion 1999; 39:701–710 37. Vamvakas EC, Carven JH: Allogeneic blood transfusion and postoperative duration of mechanical ventilation: Effects of red cell supernatant, platelet supernatant, plasma components and total transfused fluid. Vox Sang 2002; 82:141–149 38. Leal-Noval SR, Rincon-Ferrari MD, Garcia-Curiel A, et al: Transfusion of blood components and postoperative infection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Chest 2001; 119:1461–146839. Chelemer SB, Prato BS, Cox PM Jr, et al: Association of bacterial infection and red blood cell transfusion after coronary arterybypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 138–142 Blood transfusion and postoperative infectionin orthopedic patients. Transfusion………………………….
Blood transfusion and adverse effects.Mounting evidence
Blood Transfusion in Cardiac Surgery A Silent Epidemic Revisited
James D. Rawn, Circulation 2007;116:2523Editorial
• Retrospective cohort study• 8,516 patients with Cardiac Surgery in 1996 – 2003• Data from three well maintained data sources
• 1. PATS*, linked to 2. hematology, 3. blood bank databases• Infection and ischemic outcome, LOS, death
• Impact of LK-Depletion (since 1999)• Propensity score, Multivariate regression
*Patient Analysis and Tracking System, London, UK (started 1996)
Murphy GJ et al.:‘Increased Mortality, Postoperative Morbidity, and Cost After Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Patients
Having Cardiac Surgery.’Circulation 2007;116:2544
• Red Cell Transfusion increased dose dependently• Mortality, Morbidity, LOS, Cost
• No impact of Nadir Hct or LK-Depletion
Murphy GJ et al.: Circulation 2007;116:2544Summary of results
Originally 8,515 Patients with Cardiac Surgery
0
5
10
15
20
25
InHospital
1 2 3 4 5 6 7Years of follow-up
Mo
rtal
ity
fro
m a
ny
cau
se (
%)
Transfused
Not transfused
Murphy GJ et al.: Circulation 2007;116:2544
Ischemic Outcome regarding Hct
0
6
12
18
< 21 % < 24 % < 27 % > 27%
Nadir Hematocrit during the first 12 postop. hours
Inc
ide
nc
e (
%)
Transfused (4,842)Not transfused (3,674)
Cardiac surgery patients – retrospective cohort study.Murphy GJ et al.: Circulation 2007;116:2544
Infectious Outcome regarding Hct
0
3
6
9
12
15
< 21 % < 24 % < 27 % > 27%
Nadir Hematocrit during the first 12 postop. hours
Inci
den
ce (
%)
Transfused (4,842)Not transfused (3,674)
Cardiac surgery patients – retrospective cohort study.Murphy GJ et al.: Circulation 2007;116:2544
Limitations
• Retrospective• Particular indications unknown
Strength
• Transfusion Data from independent source• Groups: Well balanced prognostic factors
• Propensity analysis• Nadir Hct without effect in both groups• RBC effect similar in high- and low risk
Glance LG et al.:‘Association between Intraoperative Blood Transfusion
and Mortality and Morbidity in patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.’
Anesthesiology 2011;114:283
• Retrospective – multicenter• 11,000 patients: General, Vascular, Orthopedic• NSQIP* Database• Anemic patients (Hct < 30%) - max. 2 U RBC
• Thus blood loss not relevant• Multivariate analysis (MVA)
*American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
ACS-NSQIP* data of > 200 hospitals [*American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program]
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Initial cHb(g/dl)
Sepsis SSI Thrombosis Mortality
Inci
den
ce (
%)
Non Transfused (7,940)
Transfused - max. 2U (2,160)
Surgical patients with preoperative anemiaGlance LG et al.: Anesthesiology 2011;114:283
P < 0.005
P < 0.01
P < 0.001
P < 0.05
Limitations
• Transfused patients worse• MVA is no 100% ‘cure’• Particular indications unknown
Strength
• Quality of data base, (p value)• Number of patients• Max. 2 U of PRC transfused
Marik PE et al.:‘Efficacy of red cell transfusion in the critically ill:
A systematic review of the literature’Crit Care Med 2008;36:2667
• 571 observational studies screened• 45 selected (30,915 patients total)• MVA mandatory• Endpoints: Mortality and severe morbidity
• Benefit of RC-transfusion outweighs risk?
Risk > Benefit (42)
Benefit > Risk (1)
neutral (2)
PRC transfusion and outcome on ICU45 Studies, 687 patients each (mean)
Marik PE. Crit Care Med 2008;36:2667
1st ConclusionRed Cell Transfusion
deteriorates patients outcome
II. Is there any scientific proof of the benefit of allogeneic Red Cells?
Lessons learned from
von Bormann B: Anaesthesist 2007;56:380
Identical Outcome
► Surgery (All)► Transplantation► Intensive Care► Trauma ► Oncology
Severely ill.
.‘A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of
Transfusion requirements in critical care‘Hébert PC et al. New Engl J Med 1999;340:409
• Enrolled: 838 patients out of 6,451 (25 facilities) • Normovolemic; initial cHb ≤ 9 g/dl• Randomization to alternative transfusion triggers
• cHb either ≤ 7.0 or ≤ 10.0 g/dl • Extensive Statistics
Prospective randomized study in ICU-patients
0
5
10
15
20
25
PRC (U) Cardiac Infectious ICU HospitalComplications Mortality
Inci
den
ce (
%)
Trigger 7,0 g/dl (418)
Trigger 10,0 g/dl (418)
Hébert PC et al.: New Engl J Med 1999;340:409
P < 0.05P < 0.01
Hébert et al.: Subgroup analysis. SimilarResults for Patients with myocardial ischemia.
Hébert PC et al.: Crit Care Med 2001;29(2):231
Infants.
Prospective randomized study in ICU-infants (3 D - 14 Y)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Transfused MOF Nosocom.Infect.
Mortality
Inci
den
ce (
%) 7,0 g/dl (n = 320)
9,5 g/dl (n = 317)
Lacroix J et al.: New Engl J Med 2007;356:1609
P < 0.001
2nd ConclusionRed Cell Transfusion
has no proven benefit for the recipientincl. high-risk patients
CATS™ (Fresenius)
PAD IAT
III. Autologous Alternatives• Preoperative Autologous Deposit (PAD)
• Intraoperative Autotransfusion (IAT)
Author (Year) Patients Specific effect of PAD
Reduction in homolo-gous PRC - transfusion
Anders MJ (1996)
Hip- and Knee-arthroplasty
Less deep vein thrombosis
92%
Dietrich W (2005)
CABG 80%
Heiss MM (1993)
Colectomy for cancer treatment
Halving SSI 50%
Flordal PA (1997)
Pancreatectomy for cancer treatment
50%
Nagino M (2005)
Hepatobiliary resection for cancer treatment
Halving postoperative morbidity
86%
Preoperative autologous Deposit (PAD) in surgery.
Author (Year)
Patients Specific effect of IAT
Reduction in homologous PRC-transfusion
Lorentz (2000)
Hip-Arthroplasty
45%
Goel P (2007)
CABG 25%
Brown CV (2010)
Trauma with massive blood loss
50%
Ubee SS (2011)
Radical open prostatectomy (cancer)
LOS shorter; no influence on relapse rate
84%
Intraoperative autotransfusion (IAT) in surgery.
3rd ConclusionAutologous Transfusion is an appropriate
alternative.Cooperation between
departments* involved is mandatory!*Transfusion Medicine, Surgery, Anesthesiology.
Transfusion mistreatment – who’s fault?Or: who goes to jail?
The one who does it, probably You!
Finally: Legal aspects.Current situation in Europe
SURVEY - again
CASE I. • 40 years old male, car accident. • Several fractures, hematothorax.
• Treatment in sufficient progress (OR). • No active bleeding. No coagulopathy.
• No relevant medical history.
At what Hemoglobin concentration (cHb) do you transfuse red cells?
A = ≤ 7.0 B = ≤ 8.0 C = ≤ 9.0 D = ≤ 10.0 g/dl
CASE II.• 80 years old female.
• Hemihepatectomy for cancer treatment. • No active bleeding. No coagulopathy.
• Adequate mental conditions. No cardiac history.
At what Hemoglobin concentration (cHb) do you transfuse red cells?
A = ≤ 7.0 B = ≤ 8.0 C = ≤ 9.0 D = ≤ 10.0 g/dl
Conclusion – Message
“It’s time for a changetoward better patient care.”
Donat Spahn: Anesthesiology 2011;114(2):234
Thank you!
The following slides could serve for discussionin case these issues are raised.
IAT and Tumor surgeryHANSEN E: Transfusion 1999;39:608
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Cel
l co
lon
ies
(n)
Colon Kidney Ovary Prostate Breast Melanoma
Type of carcinoma
Washed red cells contaminated with tumor cells
No Irradiation Irradiation
Preoperative autologous donation (mean 3.4 U/patient)in liver cancer patients
0
20
40
60
80
100
Allogeneic transfusion Postop. Morbidity
Pat
ien
ts (
%)
PAD (73)
Control (27)
100 consecutive hepatobiliary resectionsNagino M et al.: Surgery 2005;137(2):148
P < 0.001 P < 0.001
Similar relapse rate after 3 months
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Homol. Red Cells (%) postop. cHb (g/dl) LOS (days)
IAT (506 ml autol. RC)
No IAT
IAT in open radical prostatectomy. [Two equal groups, each n = 25]
Ubee SS et al.: Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011;93(2):157
P < 0.001
CD4+ T-Helpercells
20
30
40
Baseline Day 0 Day 5
Su
bs
ets
(%
)
Autologous (30)Homologous (30)
Patients with gastrectomy.Chen G et al.: J Zheijang Univ SciB 2007;8:560