ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 1
Catchingthewanderingmind:
Meditationasawindowintospontaneousthought
WendyHasenkamp,PhDa,b
a:Mind&LifeInstitute,Charlottesville,VA
b:DepartmentofPsychology,UniversityofVirginia,Charlottesville,VA
Correspondingauthor:WendyHasenkamp([email protected])
ToappearinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought,K.C.R.FoxandK.Christoff
(Editors),forthcoming(2017).NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 2
Abstract
Thischapterconsidersaformofattention-basedmeditationasanovelmeanstogain
insightintothemechanismsandphenomenologyofspontaneousthought.Focused
attention(FA)meditationinvolveskeepingone’sattentiononachosenobject,and
repeatedlycatchingthemindwhenitstraysfromtheobjectintospontaneousthought.This
practicecanthusbeviewedasakindofself-caughtmindwanderingparadigm,which
suggestsitmayhavegreatutilityforresearchonspontaneousthought.Currentfindings
abouttheeffectsofmeditationonmindwanderingandmeta-awarenessarereviewed,and
implicationsfornewresearchparadigmsthatleveragefirst-personreportingduringFA
meditationarediscussed.Specifically,researchrecommendationsaremadethatmay
enablecustomizedanalysisofindividualepisodesofmindwanderingandtheirneural
correlates.Itishopedthatbycombiningdetailedsubjectivereportsfromexperienced
meditatorswithrigorousobjectivephysiologicalmeasures,wecanadvanceour
understandingofhumanconsciousness.
Keywords:meditation,mindwandering,meta-awareness,spontaneousthought,focused
attention
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 3
Oneofthecentralchallengesinstudyingspontaneousthoughtisthefactthatmind
wanderingoftenoccurswithoutintentionorawareness(Smallwood&Schooler,2015).
Thisleadstoinevitabledifficultyinassessment,asparticipantscannotaccuratelyreporton
mentalexperiencesaboutwhichtheyareunaware.Inlightofthis,strategiesthatmay
increaseawarenessofmentalstateswouldseemtohaveparticularutilityforthestudyof
spontaneousthought.Inthischapter,Iconsideraformofattention-basedmeditationasa
novelmeanstogaininsightintotheprocessesunderlyingspontaneousthoughtandthe
abilitytodetectit.
InWesternculture,bothscientificandpopularinterestinvariousformsof
meditationhasburgeonedoverthelastdecade.In2012,theNationalHealthInterview
Surveyestimatedthat18millionAmericansusedmeditationasacomplementaryhealth
approach(Black,Clarke,Barnes,Stussman,&Nahin,2015).Inaddition,scientificresearch
oncontemplativepracticeslikemeditationcontinuestoaccumulateatarapidpace,with
over2,000publicationssincejust2010.Whilethefieldisstillinitsinfancy,earlyresults
pointtosomepromisingclinicalapplicationsaswellasneuralchangesassociatedwith
repeatedmeditationpractice(e.g.,Foxetal.,2014;Goyaletal.,2014;Tang,Hölzel,&
Posner,2015).
MostformsofmeditationcurrentlyusedintheWesthaveBuddhistorigins,but
manyhavebeenadaptedinasecularwaytoemphasizethementaltrainingaspectsand
avoidthemorereligiousorritualisticelementsoftraditionalpractices(McMahan,2008).
Meditationsvarywidelyinthecognitiveandemotionalstatestheyendeavortofoster,as
wellastheinstructionstheyusetoachievethesegoals.Forexample,openmonitoring
stylesofmeditationseektostrengthenandexpandawarenesstoincludeanythingentering
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 4
themind,whilecompassionpracticesareusedtocultivatespecificemotionalstates
towardsoneselfandothers(Dahl,Lutz,&Davidson,2015;Lutz,Slagter,Dunne,&
Davidson,2008).
Despitethisplurality,manycontemplativepracticesarebasedonafoundationof
attentiontrainingthatservestofamiliarizeapersonwithhisorherthoughtsandemotions
andgaincontrolovercognitivefaculties(Dahletal.,2015;Lutzetal.,2008;Wallace,2006).
ItisthisbasicattentiontrainingthatIwouldliketoconsiderinthischapter,asitmayhold
potentialtoadvanceourunderstandingofthecognitiveandneuralmechanismsunderlying
thearisinganddetectionofspontaneousthought.
Cognitiveandneuraldynamicsduringfocusedattention(FA)meditation
Onecommonmeditationpractice—knownasfocusedattention(FA),concentration
meditation,orshamatha—canbeviewedfromacognitiveperspectiveasakindof
sustainedattentiontask.DuringFAmeditation,attentionisplacedandmaintainedona
chosenobject(e.g.,sensationsofbreathing,ambientsounds,avisualimage,etc.).Because
spontaneousthought,ormindwandering,willalmostinvariablyoccur,thepractitioneris
instructedtosimplynoticewhenthemindhasstrayedfromtheobjectoffocus,andreturn
herorhisattentiontotheobjectwithoutengaginginelaborativethinkingorjudgment
(Wallace,2006).Atsomepointafterattentionisreturnedtothechosenobject,mind
wanderingwillusuallyoccuragain,andthecyclerepeats.Thus,asessionofFAmeditation
practiceisaniterativecyclethroughthedynamiccognitivestatesoffocusedattention
(FOCUS),mindwandering(MW),awarenessofmindwandering(AWARE),andshifting
attentionbacktotheobject(SHIFT;Hasenkamp,Wilson-Mendenhall,Duncan,&Barsalou,
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 5
2012).AbasiccognitivemodelofthisprocessisshowninFigure1.
AninterestingaspectofFAmeditationisthattheinstructionsaretokeepone’s
attentiononagivenobject,whichsetsupanapparent“goalstate”ofsingle-pointedfocus.
Inthissituation,anycognitivestatethatdivergesfromthatgoal(e.g.,MW)becomesa
“target”todetectusingthefacultyofmeta-awareness.Ineffect,theselectionofan
attentionalobjectinthispracticesetsupasubjectivecounterpointtothenormal
fluctuatingcontentsofthemind,bringingthescatterednatureofthoughtintoreliefagainst
thecontrastofasteadyobject.Overtimeandwithrepeatedpractice,themeditatoris
actuallybuildingskillsnotonlyofsustainingormaintainingattention(FOCUS),butalso—
andperhapsmoreimportantly—ofmonitoringandrecognizingnaturallyarisingmental
statesorspontaneousthoughts(AWARE),aswellasdisengagingandre-directingattention
(SHIFT).Eventhoughtheseadditionalskillsmaynotbetheinstructedgoalofthepractice,
amajoraimofthiskindoftraininginbothitstraditionalandcurrentapplicationsisto
developmeta-awarenessalongsideattentionalcontrol(Dahletal.,2015;Lutzetal.,2008).
GiventhatFAmeditationischaracterizedbyanoscillationbetweenstatesoffocus
Figure1:CognitivedynamicsofFAmeditation.AsessionofFAmeditationisaniterativecycleofmentalstatesincludingobject-focusedattention(FOCUS),mindwandering(MW),awarenessofmindwandering(AWARE),andshiftingattentionbacktotheobject(SHIFT).TheFOCUSstateistheintended“goal,”whileMWrepresentsadeviationfromthatgoal,andbecomesasalientmentaltargetinthecontextofFAmeditation.Imagemodifiedwithpermissionfrom(Hasenkamp,2014).
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 6
andspontaneousthought,itmaybeofparticularbenefitinthecontextofcognitive
research.MycolleaguesandIdevelopedanfMRIparadigmthatleveragestheunique
frameworkofFAmeditationcoupledwithsubjectivereporttostudytheneuralcorrelates
ofmindwanderingandattention(Hasenkampetal.,2012).Westudiedmeditation
practitionerswhohadexperiencewithFAmeditation,assessingbrainactivitywithfMRIas
theyengagedinthispracticefor20minutes.Participantswereinstructedtokeeptheir
attentiononthesensationsofbreathing(specifically,theaircominginandoutofthe
nostrils),andwhenevertheynoticedtheirmindhadwanderedcompletelyawayfromthis
object,topressabuttonandthenreturntheirfocustothebreath.Thus,thetaskwas
similartoatypicalFAmeditationsession,simplyaddingabuttonpressatthemomentof
awarenessofmindwandering(AWARE;seeFigure2).Asparticipantsareaskedtoidentify
andreportepisodesofspontaneousthought,thisdesigncanalsobeconsideredaself-
caughtmindwanderingtask.1
Inourstudy,thebuttonpressprovidedatemporalmarkerforthemomentof
awarenessofmindwandering,andpresumablyalsotheendofthemindwandering
episode.Basedonthismarker,wedividedthedatainto4distinctphases(3seceach)
correspondingtothecognitivemodelinFigure1.ByanalyzingfMRIdatawithinonlythese
briefphases,wecouldrestrictourwindowofanalysistoaspecifictimeduringwhichwe
couldberelativelyconfidentoftheparticipant’smentalexperience.Notably,eventhough1Twomajorapproachestostudyingspontaneousthoughtincludeprobe-caughtandself-caughtdesigns(Smallwood&Schooler,2006,2015).Inprobe-caughtparadigms,theexperimenterintroducesthoughtprobesduringanongoingtasktoassesswhethertheparticipantwason-taskoroff-task.Inself-caughtdesigns,theparticipantisinstructedtoreportmindwanderingwhenevers/hebecomesawareofit.Theself-caughtapproachisnotasaccurateasprobe-caughtfordeterminingfrequencyofspontaneousthoughtbecauseitdependsontheparticipant’sawarenessofmindwandering,whichisonlyintermittent.However,self-caughtdesignsaremoreusefulforunderstandingthemechanismsunderlyingtheemergenceanddetectionofspontaneousthought,andhavestrongpotentialforelucidatinggeneralprocessesthroughwhichpeoplebecomeawareofmentalstates(Smallwood&Schooler2006).
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 7
thisapproachmeantincludingonlyafractionofourdataintheanalysis,ourfindingswere
quiterobust,andconsistentwiththefunctionsofwell-studiedbrainnetworks(seebelow).
Ofcourse,significantvariabilityundoubtedlystillexistsbothbetweenandwithin
individuals,makingthismodelhighlyoversimplifiedandsubjecttonoise(seeHasenkamp
etal.,2012;Hasenkamp,2014foradiscussionoflimitationsandpossibilitiesforextending
themodel).Nevertheless,itappearsthatusingsubjectivereporttodefineanarrow
windowofanalysisservedtoincreasethesignal-to-noiseratioratherthanreducepower.
Comprehensiveresultsfromthisstudyhavebeendiscussedelsewhere(Hasenkamp
&Barsalou,2012;Hasenkampetal.,2012;Hasenkamp,2014),butashortsummaryis
providedhereforreference(Figure2).DuringtheMWphase,analysesrevealedactivityin
brainregionsassociatedwiththedefaultmodenetwork(medialprefrontalcortexand
posteriorcingulatecortex),whichhavebeenstronglyimplicatedinspontaneousthought
(Andrews-Hanna,Reidler,Huang,&Buckner,2010;Andrews-Hanna,Smallwood,&Spreng,
2014;Buckner,Andrews-Hanna,&Schacter,2008;Davey,Pujol,&Harrison,2016;Ellamil
etal.,2016;Fox,Spreng,Ellamil,Andrews-Hanna,&Christoff,2015;Masonetal.,2007;
Raichle,2015).IntheAWAREphase,thesaliencenetwork(bilateralanteriorinsulaand
dorsalanteriorcingulatecortex)wasstronglyactivated.Thisnetworkhasbeenimplicated
intheidentificationofsalientorrelevantstimuliacrossdomains,andhelpstoengageand
controlattention(Mooneyham,Mrazek,Mrazek,&Schooler,2016;Seeleyetal.,2007).
DuringtheSHIFTphase,elementsoftheexecutivenetworkwereactivethathavebeen
implicatedindisengagementandre-orientingofattention(dorsolateralprefrontalcortex
andinferiorparietallobule;Corbetta,Patel,&Shulman,2008;Mooneyhametal.,2016;
Posner&Petersen,1990;Seeleyetal.,2007).Finally,aregionofthedorsolateralprefrontal
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 8
cortexassociatedwithworkingmemoryandsustainedattention(Curtis&D’Esposito,
2003;D’Esposito,2007;Miller&Cohen,2001)wasactiveduringtheFOCUSperiod,
indicatingcontinuedexecutivenetworkactivity.
Ingeneral,thefunctionsofbrainnetworksthatwereactivatedduringthesefour
briefcognitivephasesalignedwiththementalfunctionswebelievedtobeoccurringat
thosetimes.Specifically,mindwanderingwasassociatedwithdefaultmoderegions,
awarenessofmindwanderingwasassociatedwiththesaliencenetwork,andshiftingand
Figure2:BrainnetworksinvolvedinFAmeditation.Usingabutton-pressfromtheparticipanttomarkthemomentofawareness,fourbriefcognitivephasesweredefinedaroundthistimepoint,andneuralactivitywasanalyzedaccordingly.TheseresultsshowactivityduringtheFOCUS,AWARE,andSHIFTphasescomparedtotheMWphase;MWactivityiscomparedtoSHIFTactivity.Mindwanderingwasassociatedwithdefaultmoderegions(blue),awarenessofmindwanderingwasassociatedwiththesaliencenetwork(green;redshowsactivationsduetoamotorcontrolforthebuttonpress),andshiftingandmaintainingattentionwasassociatedwiththeexecutivenetwork(orange,lightorange).Imagemodifiedwithpermissionfrom(Hasenkamp,2014)..
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 9
maintainingattentionwereassociatedwiththeexecutivenetwork.Additionalanalyses
showedthatneuralactivityduringthesecognitivephases,aswellasrestingstate
functionalconnectivity,weremodulatedbylifetimemeditationexperience,suggesting
experience-dependentplasticityinrelevantnetworks(Hasenkamp&Barsalou,2012;
Hasenkampetal.,2012).Thisworkhighlightstheutilityandimportanceofsubjective
reportinthestudyofdynamicmentalstates,andhashelpedtorefineourunderstandingof
thecomplexneuralandcognitivecorrelatesofFAmeditation.
Meditationpracticeandcognitiveprocessesaroundspontaneousthought
GiventheoverarchinggoalsofFAmeditationanditsemphasisoncatchingthe
wanderingmind,itisoftenassumedthatwithrepeatedpractice,meditatorswill
experiencedecreasedmindwanderingandincreasedattentionalcontrol.Suchcognitive
effectshavelongbeennotedwithincontemplativetraditions(Dahletal.,2015;Wallace,
2006),andrecentresearchalsosupportstheseclaimstovaryingdegrees.
Contemplativeresearchhasfoundevidenceofreducedmindwanderingfollowing
briefmindfulbreathing(Mrazek,Smallwood,&Schooler,2012),followingseveralweeksof
meditationpractice(Jazaierietal.,2015;Jha,Morrison,Parker,&Stanley,2016;Morrison,
Goolsarran,Rogers,&Jha,2014;Mrazek,Franklin,Phillips,Baird,&Schooler,2013;butsee
Banks,Welhaf,&Srour,2015),andfollowingoneandthreemonthsofintensiveretreat
practice(Zanescoetal.,2016).Inaddition,experiencedmeditatorsreportedlessmind
wanderingthannon-meditatorsinseveralstudies(Breweretal.,2011;Garrison,Zeffiro,
Scheinost,Constable,&Brewer,2015;Levinson,Stoll,Kindy,Merry,&Davidson,2014),
andshowedreduceddefaultmodenetworkactivationcomparedtocontrolsduringvarious
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 10
typesofmeditation(Breweretal.,2011).Thisagreeswithotherstudiessuggesting
meditationexperienceisassociatedwithdifferentialdefaultmodeactivityandconnectivity
(Farb,Segal,&Anderson,2013;Garrisonetal.,2015;Hasenkamp&Barsalou,2012;Janget
al.,2011;Mooneyhametal.,2016;Tayloretal.,2013).Severallinesofresearchalsosuggest
thatrepeatedmeditationimprovesvariousaspectsofattention(Jhaetal.,2015;Jha,
Krompinger,&Baime,2007;Lutzetal.,2009;MacLeanetal.,2010;Malinowski,2013;
Sahdraetal.,2011;Slagteretal.,2007;Zanesco,King,Maclean,&Saron,2013).Moreover,
manystudieshavefoundevidenceforneuralchangesinrelevantnetworksfollowing
meditation,supportingtheideathataprocessofexperience-dependentneuroplasticity
mayunderliethedevelopmentofthesecognitiveeffects(seeFoxetal.,2014;Tang,Hölzel,
&Posner,2015forreview).
Thus,agrowingbodyofevidencesupportsthenotionthatrepeatedmeditation
leadstochangesinattentionalcapacityandreductionsinmindwandering.Arelated
questioniswhethermeditationpracticecanenhancemeta-awareness.Thisisareasonable
hypothesis,asmonitoringfordistractionisanessentialpartofmaintainingfocused
attention.BysettingupthespecificcognitiveframeworkofFAmeditationinthemindof
thepractitioner,spontaneousthoughtbecomeshighlightedbecauseitdivergesfromthe
goalstateofdirectedfocus.Inthiscontext,theprocessesaround,andcontentsof,mind
wanderingacquireincreasedsaliencebecausetheyhavebecomeatargetformeta-
awarenesstodetect.Inourstudy,themomentofdetection(AWARE)wasassociatedwith
robustactivationofthebrain’ssaliencenetwork,similartoresultsfromsimpletarget
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 11
detectiontasksinothermodalities(Seeleyetal.,2007;Uddin,2014).2Thisneural
convergenceacrosstaskssuggeststhatduringFAmeditation,thecognitivestateofmind
wandering(e.g.,aninternal,mentaltarget)mayfunctioninthesamewayasstandard
visualorauditorytargetsusedinothertasks(e.g.,external,sensorytargets)—something
thatisarbitrarilydefinedassalient,whichthemindthenmonitorsforanddetectswhenit
isidentified.Thisfindingextendsourunderstandingofthefunctionofthesalience
network,whichhasoftenbeendescribedasdetectingmainlyexternalstimuli,towarda
moregeneralsaliencedetectorthatcanbeequallytunedtointernaleventssuchasmind
wandering(Andrews-Hannaetal.,2014;Uddin,2014).InFAmeditation,then,repeatedly
ascribingsaliencetointernalthoughtsandtrainingoneselftodetectthemmaywell
enhancemeta-cognitiveabilities.
Anecdotalreportscommonlyaffirmthatthearisingofspontaneousthought
becomesmorereadilydetectableinexperiencedpractitioners(Wallace,2006),presumably
reflectingsuchanincreaseinmeta-awarenessormonitoringcapacity.Whilemeta-
awarenessisachallengingconstructtooperationalizeduetodifficultiesinconfirming
accuracy,recentworkhasbeguntoapproachthisquestionasitrelatestomeditation.One
studyfoundthatexperiencedmeditatorsperformedmoreaccuratelythannovicesona
breathcountingmeasure(confirmedwithphysiologicaltrackingofbreathing),suggesting
improvedmeta-awarenessinpractitioners(Levinsonetal.,2014).Anotherstudyfound
thatfollowing8weeksofmindfulnesstraining,participantswhopracticedmoreexhibited
greaterself-reportedmeta-awarenessofmindwanderingduringtheSARTtask(Jhaetal.,
2Theinsula,amajorhubofthesaliencenetwork,isalsoproposedtobea“switch”betweenthedefaultmodenetwork,associatedwithmindwandering,andtheexecutivenetwork,associatedwithattentionalcontrol(Menon&Uddin,2010;Sridharan,Levitin,&Menon,2008).ThisissupportedbythefindingsshowninFigure2,withinsulaactivitybridgingdefaultmodeandexecutivenetworkactivity.
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 12
2016).Introspectiveaccuracyalsoappearstobeimprovedbymeditationtraining,as
showninmetacognitiveabilityformemory(Baird,Mrazek,Phillips,&Schooler,2014)and
emotionalself-awareness(Sze,Gyurak,Yuan,&Levenson,2010).Finally,twolongitudinal
studiesfoundthatafterintensivemeditationtraining,practitionersreportedagreater
proportionofself-caughtmindwanderingepisodesfollowingtraining,afteradjustingfora
reducedoverallnumberofepisodes(Zanescoetal.,2016).
Whilethesestudiesaresuggestiveofincreasesinmeta-awarenessfollowing
meditation,theydonotspeakdirectlytowhethermeditatorscanmoreaccuratelyor
validlydetectmindwandering.Forexample,probesaboutmeta-awarenessduringthe
SART,aswellasreportsofself-caughtmindwanderingduringatask,relyonlyonself-
reportwithnobehavioralvalidation;breathcounting,whilevalidatedwithaphysiological
measure,doesnotaddressawarenessofspontaneousthoughts.Alongtheselines,Zedelius
andcolleagues(2015)usedanovelparadigmtodeterminewhetherincentivizingpeopleto
catchtask-unrelatedthoughtsduringreadingwouldincreasetheiraccuracy.Bycorrelating
self-caughtmindwanderingwithacovertbehavioralmeasureofmindwandering,the
researchersfoundthatmotivatingparticipantstomonitortheirthoughtsdidindeed
increasethenumberofself-catches,aswellasincreasingthevalidityofthesereports.3
Futurestudiescouldusethiskindofapproachtoinvestigatewhethermeditationtraining
affectsone’scapacitytomonitorthoughtsanddetectthemaccurately.
Thus,whileresearchisstillintheearlystages,initialresultscoupledwith
considerableanecdotalevidencesuggestthatrepeatedmeditationmayimprovemeta-
3IfoneconsiderstheexplicitintentionbehindFAmeditationasatypeofmotivationtodetectmindwandering,thisfindingmayprovidefurthersupportfortheideathatrepeatedFApracticewillincreasemeta-awareness.
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 13
awareness,leadingtoanenhancedabilitytodetectspontaneousthought.Ifthisisthecase,
experiencedmeditatorsmaybeparticularlybeneficialasparticipantsinstudiesofself-
caughtmindwandering.
Defininganepisodeofspontaneousthought
Achallengeinallstudiesofspontaneousthoughtisthatthetemporalwindowof
mindwanderingisextremelyvariable,andourabilitytodefineithighlyimprecise.To
makeprogressinunderstandingthephenomenologyandphysiologyofmindwandering,
wewillneedtomoreclearlyoutlinethecriteriafor—andtemporalboundariesof—the
onsetandterminationofasingleepisode(Ellamiletal.,2016;Metzinger,2013;Smallwood
&Schooler,2015).Existingparadigmsaresubjecttoseverallimitationsinthisregard.
Usingself-caughtdesigns,experimenterscanonlymeasurethemomentofdetectionof
mindwanderingandnotitsonset.Probe-caughtparadigmssimilarlydonotshedlighton
thetemporalityofamindwanderingepisode,againonlycollectingsubjectiveinputatthe
momentoftheprobe.Inarecentreview,SmallwoodandSchooler(2015)suggestthatthe
fieldshouldworktoidentify“reliablebehavioralandphysiologicalmeasuresthatcan
indicatetheonsetandoffsetofmindwanderingwithouthavingtorelyonindividuals’self-
reports.”Whilethesethird-personmeasureswillcertainlybeimportant,researchersmay
alsobeabletoleverageself-reportinamorecarefulwaytoaddresscurrentlimitations.
Particularlywhenattemptingtodetermineneuralcorrelatesofmindwandering,
definingthetemporalboundariesofasingleepisodeisessential,butmethodsfordoingso
havebeenelusive.Inourstudy,wechosearelativelyshortwindow(3secondspriorto
detection)inanattempttolimitvariabilityincognitivestatesduringtheMWphase.
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 14
Previousstudieshaveusedlongertemporalwindowstoexamineneuralactivitypriorto
self-reportedmindwanderinginresponsetothoughtprobes(e.g.,10secondsormore,see
Allenetal.,2013;Christoff,Gordon,Smallwood,Smith,&Schooler,2009;Stawarczyk,
Majerus,Maquet,&D’Argembeau,2011).Whilethisapproachincreasesstatisticalpower
byusingmoredata,itmaycomplicatetheinterpretationofrelatedbrainactivityby
includingtimepointsthatcorrespondtocognitivestatesoccurringpriortotheonsetof
mindwandering(i.e.,attentional/on-taskstates;Figure3).Withinagiventemporal
windowdefinedbytheexperimenter,thesignal-to-noiseratioofactualmindwandering
dependsontheparticipant’ssubjectivestateduringeachTR,4whichwillvarytrialbytrial.
Insomecases,mindwanderingwillhavebegunbeforethewindowofanalysis,makingthe
datafullyrepresentativeoftheneuralcorrelatesofspontaneousthought(Figure3A).In
othercases,mindwanderingmaybebrief,andfocusedattentionwillalsohaveoccurred
withinthewindowofanalysis—ifthishappens,thesignal-to-noiseratioisreducedand
attemptstointerpretneuralactivitybecomeconfounded(Figure3B).5
Arelatedandlargelyunexploredissueiswhetherconsciousattentioncanbe
directedtowardmultipleobjectsatthesametime.Manyexperimentsusingprobe-caught
mindwanderingasknotjustwhethertheparticipant’smindwason-oroff-task,but
provideacontinuousscaleforreporting(e.g.,oneendpointrepresentingcompletelyon-
taskandtheotherrepresentingcompletelyoff-task).Participantsoftenanswersomewhere
inthemiddle(e.g.,Allenetal.,2013;Christoffetal.,2009;Jhaetal.,2016;M.Mrazek,
4AnfMRIscanneracquiresanimageofbrainactivitydataonceeveryfewsecondsdependingontheparametersofthescan;thetimeittakestocollectafullpassofdataiscalledaTR.5Itshouldbenotedthatevena3-secondwindowofanalysisisrelativelylongwhencomparedtothesubjectiveexperienceoftransientstates(e.g.,amomentofmeta-awareness,orshiftingattentionbetweentwoobjects),andouranalysismaywellhaveincludeddatafromnon-mindwanderingstates,asdiscussedinHasenkampetal.(2012).
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 15
personalcommunication),suggestingthatthetransitionfromfocusedattentionintomind
wanderingisnotadichotomousexperience,butratheroccursinagradedway—atleast
phenomenologically.6Thisresultsinakindof“hybrid”subjectiveexperienceofbeing
partiallyfocusedandpartiallydistracted(Figure3C).7Splittingofattentionhasbeen
6Interestingly,Buddhistpsychologytheorizesthateventhoughfromaphenomenologicalperspectiveitmayseemlikeattentioncanbeplacedontwoobjectssimultaneously,inrealityattentionisrapidlyshiftingfromoneobjecttoanotherandbackagain.Thishappensmorequicklythanourconsciousawarenesscanprocess,sothemindblursmomentstogether,creatinganillusionthatweareattendingtomultiplethingsatonce(Wallace,2006).7Inpilotingourexperimentdescribedabove,manyparticipantsreportedthiskindofparallelorhybridattention,withsomepercentageofattentionretainedonthebreath,andsomeportionengagedinthought.In
Figure3:Definingthetemporalwindowofanalysis.Thisschematicdepictsthreehypotheticalcognitivescenariosandrelatedwindowofanalysisforaneuroimagingstudyofself-caughtmindwandering.TickmarksdenoteTRs(thefMRIscanner’ssamplingrate,here2secondseach),andtheyellowbarrepresentsananalyticalwindowof10secondspriortothebuttonpress.A)Ascenariowherethewindowofanalysisisaccurateandonlyincludesmindwanderingstates.B)Ascenariowherethewindowistoolong,andincludescontaminatingfocusedstates.C)Agradedtransitionbetweenfocusedattentionandmindwandering,showingahybridstatewheresomeportionoftheattentionremainsontheobjectforatime,butspontaneousthoughtstilloccurs.Inthiscase,thewindowcontainsallthreementalstates,againconfoundingtheanalysis.
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 16
examinedinstudiesofvisualattention(Awh&Pashler,2000;Kramer&Hahn,1995;
Müller,Malinowski,Gruber,&Hillyard,2003),buthasrarelybeenconsideredinstudiesof
spontaneousthought(seeDixon,Fox,&Christoff,2014).Asitseemslikelythatthiskindof
parallelattentionisacommonphenomenologicalexperiencethatwouldhaveimportant
implicationsfortheaccurateidentificationofneuralcorrelates,itwarrantsfurtherstudyin
cognitivescienceandrepresentsanotherareaformoredetailedsubjectivereporting.
Regardlessofthedurationofthetemporalwindowofanalysis,itisnotablethatall
studiestodatehavecalculatedthestarttimeofamindwanderingoroff-taskepisode
relativetotheendpoint(eitherself-caughtorprobe-caught),andnotbasedonanyother
subjectiveinput.Thisintroducesanobviouslackofprecisioninanalysis,whichmayhinder
ourabilitytoaccuratelyunderstandtheneurophysiologicalunderpinningsofspontaneous
thought.
PotentialutilityofsubjectivereportduringFAmeditation
TheFAmeditationparadigmoutlinedhereiswellsuitedtohighlighttheunfolding
ofspontaneousthoughtinthemindoftheparticipant,andcouldbeleveragedinnumerous
waystoobtainmoredetailedandaccuratesubjectiveinformationabouttheonset,
contents,andterminationofmindwanderingepisodes.ItisalsolikelythatexperiencedFA
meditationpractitionerswouldbeabletoprovideveryfine-grainedreportsonboththe
temporalandphenomenalunfoldingofspontaneousthought,therebyenablinga
heretoforeunavailablelevelofanalysisincognitiveresearch(Lutz&Thompson,2003).
lightofthis,ourtaskinstructionsweretopressthebuttononlywhentheynoticedtheirattentionwascompletelyofftheobjectandtheywereimmersedinthought—inthisway,wehopedtoidentifythemostrobustperiodsofmindwanderingforanalysis.
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 17
Previousstudieshaveleveragedexperiencedmeditators’heightenedcognitiveand
emotionalcontrolaswellasnuancedreportingabilitytoexamineexperiencessuchasnon-
referentialcompassion(Lutz,Greischar,Rawlings,Ricard,&Davidson,2004),non-dual
awareness(Josipovic,2014),specificdegreesofintensityofcompassiongeneratedduring
meditation(Klimecki,Leiberg,Lamm,&Singer,2013),andmindwandering(Ellamiletal.,
2016;Hasenkampetal.,2012).Themotivationforsuchanapproachisinformedbythe
projectofneurophenomenologyputforthbyFranciscoVarela(Varela,Thompson,&Rosch,
1992;Varela,1996).AsexplainedbyLutzandThompson(2003),withinthisframework,
“phenomenologicallyprecisefirst-persondataproducedbyemployingfirst-person
methodsprovidestrongconstraintsontheanalysisandinterpretationofthephysiological
processesrelevanttoconsciousness.”Below,Iexaminethepotentialutilityof
incorporatingsuchsubjectively-derivedconstraintsinthestudyofspontaneousthought.
Fromatemporalperspective,itisnotablethatmeditationpractitionersmaybeable
todetectmindwanderingrelativelyquicklyafteritsonset.Evidencetosupportthisclaim
comesfromarecentstudy(Zanescoetal.,2016)inwhichexperiencedmeditators
performingareadingtaskidentifiedgibberishtextmorequicklythannon-meditatorsin
otherstudiesusingthesameparadigm(Smallwood,Fishman,&Schooler,2007;Zedelius,
Broadway,&Schooler,2015),suggestingfasterdetectionofcognitivetargets.Indeed,a
recentstudywasbasedonthisassumption,usinganFAmeditationparadigmwith
experiencedVipassanapractitioners,askingthemtoindicatethearisingofathoughtwitha
buttonpressassoonastheywereawareofit(Ellamiletal.,2016).Presumingthatthe
buttonpressinfactoccurredveryshortlyafterthoughtonsetbasedontheheightened
introspectiveabilityoftheseparticipants,theysetthewindowofanalysisat4seconds(2
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 18
TRs)priortothebuttonpress.Contrastingbrainactivityassociatedwithdetectionof
thoughtsvs.words(whichwerepresentedatthesamefrequencyasdetectedthoughtsvia
onlinestimulusmatching),andsubsequentlymodelinghemodynamicresponsefunctions,
theyidentifieddistinctbrainareasrelatedtothegenerationofthoughts.Thisstudyoffers
anexcellentexampleofcarefulneurophenomenology,couplingtheintrospectiveabilityof
meditators,anFAparadigm,andthird-personbrainimagingmeasurestoadvanceour
knowledgeoftheneuralcorrelatesofspontaneousthought.
Therearemanypossiblenextstepstocontinueleveragingthiskindofunique
methodologicalmarriage.Onepromisingavenueinvolvesfurthercustomizationofthought
regressors,withtheaimofestimatingindividualparametersonatrial-by-trialbasis.Itis
readilyapparentthateachexperienceofspontaneousthoughtisdistinctinbothduration
andcontent,butourmethodologicalapproachestodatehave“flattened”thembyaveraging
acrossepisodes,assumingsimilaritieswherenonemayinfactexist.Thiskindof
experimentaldesign,whileunderstandablefromaresearchperspective,isfarfromideal,
andmaybesignificantlylimitingourabilitytounderstandthesubtletyandcomplexityof
themind’snaturalactivity.
Figure4depictsseveralexamplesofreportingoptionsthatcouldbeusedaloneorin
variouscombinationstocharacterizeindividualepisodesofspontaneousthoughtthat
occurwithinanFAmeditationparadigm.Ofcourse,itisimportanttorememberthat
requiringmultiplesubjectivereportswillinterferewiththenaturalisticflowofmeditation;
however,iftheaimistoenablemoredetailedcharacterizationofeachspontaneous
thoughtepisode,someinterruptionofthenormalmeditationprocessseemsacceptable.
Indeed,asnotedbyEllamilandcolleagues,thistypeof“noting”strategywherethe
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 19
practitionerquicklycategorizesthoughtsastheyariseisacommonvariantofFA
meditation(Ellamiletal.,2016;Sayadaw,2002).Evenso,careshouldbetakentoavoid
employingtoomanymeasuressimultaneously,assuch“over-characterization”maybegin
toreduceaccuracyandwouldalsolimitstatisticalpower.
Onsetandterminationofmindwandering.Assumingthoughtscouldbedetected
withinseveralsecondsofonset,advancedmeditatorscouldlikelyprovidefairlyaccurate
estimatesofthedurationofeachmindwanderingepisodeupondetection,thusenablinga
roughestimationofstarttime(Figure4A).Usingatrial-by-trialapproachwiththehelpof
Figure4:Possiblecharacterizationofindividualthoughtepisodesthroughfirst-personreportsduringFAmeditation.ThisschematicshowstwotemporallyandphenomenallydifferentepisodesofmindwanderingthatcouldoccurduringthecourseofFAmeditation.Inthiskindofdesign,eachtimethepractitionerbecomesawareofmindwandering,s/hewouldpressabutton,andthenprovidesubjectivereportonanynumberofvariables,including:A)theestimateddurationoftheepisode(basedonunitsofanalysis,suchasTRs),B)percentageofoff-taskattention,andC)variousdimensionsofthoughtcontent.Theseandothermeasurescouldbegatheredaloneorincombination,dependingontheresearchquestion.Subjectivedatacouldthenbeusedtodriveanalysesofphysiologicalcorrelatesbyprovidingbothtemporalandphenomenologicalconstraints.Forexample,thewindowofanalysisformindwanderingcouldbecustomizedforeachepisode,asshownbytheyellowbars.Otherapproachescouldcombineepisodeswithsimilarcharacterizations(e.g.,percentattention,thoughtcontent,etc.)todeterminespecificneuralcorrelates.
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 20
suchskilledparticipants,researchersmaythusbeabletoconstructveryfine-grainedand
alsocustomizedmapsofthetemporalunfoldingofspontaneousthoughtinanindividual.
Suchmapscouldthenbecorrelatedwithphysiologicalmeasurestoallowforamore
detailedunderstandingofboththearisingandcessationofspontaneousthought.Inother
words,eachepisodecouldbeascribeditsownuniqueduration,andstatisticalaveraging
wouldbeappliedonlyacrossepisodeswithsimilardurations,therebyconstraining
analysisandincreasingprecision.
Asimilarapproachcouldbetakentoestimatetheproportionofattentionremaining
ontheobjectforeachmindwanderingepisode,thusbeginningtoaddresstheneural
underpinningsofahybridorsplitattentiondiscussedabove(Figure4B).Froma
qualitativeperspective,participantscouldalsoprovidephenomenologicaldataonthe
experienceofperceptualdecoupling(Schooleretal.,2011)—theprocessofdisengaging
attentionfromcurrentperceptionsthatinitiatesspontaneousthought—aswellasthe
arisingofmeta-awarenessthatenablesself-catching.Furtherrefinementsofthe
phenomenologyofmindwanderingcouldalsobeexplored.Forexample,Metzinger(2013)
hasproposedthata“self-representationalblink”occursatthemomentofperceptual
decoupling,whichhedefinesasthesubjectivelossofattentionalcontrolandthesudden
appearanceofunintentionalmentalbehavior.Hefurthersuggeststhatatthesame
moment,theremaybeashiftinthe“unitofidentification”—thephenomenalcontentwith
whichoneidentifiesasanautonomousself.Allofthesesubtlesubjectivestatescouldbe
illuminatedwithprecisefirst-personreportsatthemomentoftheiroccurrenceinthe
contextofFAmeditation.
Phenomenalqualitiesofthoughtcontent.Anotherchallengeinstudyingspontaneous
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 21
thoughtisthesheervarietyofcontentthatcanbeexperienced.Significantadvanceshave
recentlybeenmadeindistinguishingphenomenalqualitiesofmindwanderingepisodes.
Commondimensionsincludepast–future,positive–negative,andself–other(e.g.,Andrews-
Hannaetal.,2013;Hoffmann,Banzhaf,Kanske,Bermpohl,&Singer,2016;Jazaierietal.,
2015;Killingsworth&Gilbert,2010;Ruby,Smallwood,Engen,&Singer,2013).One
intriguingaspectofspontaneousthoughtthatisbeginningtobestudiedisthedifficulty
withwhichonedisengagesfromit,alsoreferredtoasthe“stickiness”ofthoughts(vanVugt
&Broers,2016).Thesequalitieshavebeenfoundtoinfluencemood,taskperformance,
caringbehavior,andconstructssuchasdepression,rumination,andmindfulness
(Andrews-Hannaetal.,2013;Hoffmannetal.,2016;Jazaierietal.,2015;Killingsworth&
Gilbert,2010;Rubyetal.,2013;vanVugt&Broers,2016).Usingtheapproachdescribed
here,trial-by-trialreportingcouldalsobeemployedtolearnmoreabouttheneural
correlatesofspecificthoughtcontent.Forexample,upondetectionofmindwandering
withinanFAparadigm,participantscouldcategorizethoughtcontentalongtheseorother
dimensions.Customizedregressorscouldthenbecreatedforeachepisode,andthosewith
similarcharacterizationscouldbecombinedtoidentifybrainactivityunderlyingdistinct
typesorqualitiesofspontaneousthoughts(Figure4C).
Participantselection.Whilethissuggestedapproachassumesparticipantsare
experiencedmeditators,itshouldbenotedthatcarefulphenomenologicalinterviewshave
alsobeenusedsuccessfullywithnon-meditatorstogatherrichlydetailedaccountsofvery
narrowwindowsofexperience(LeVanQuyen&Petitmengin,2002;Petitmengin,2006).In
addition,non-meditatinggroupsofparticipantshaveoftenbeenusedtogatherdataonthe
contentofspontaneousthoughts(Andrews-Hannaetal.,2013;Jazaierietal.,2015;
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 22
Killingsworth&Gilbert,2010;Rubyetal.,2013;vanVugt&Broers,2016).Moreover,in
pilotingourstudy,wefoundthatnoviceswereeasilyabletoperformFAmeditationand
reportawarenessofmindwanderingepisodes.Thus,itmaybethattheapproaches
outlinedaboveneednotberestrictedtoexperiencedmeditators.However,itislikelythat
beginnerswillhavelowerlevelsofmeta-awareness,andthereforeexperiencemore
frequentmindwanderingand/orlongerperiodsofmindwanderingbeforedetection
occurs.Ifthisistrue,novicesmaynotbeidealforprovidinghighlyfine-grainedsubjective
reporting,particularlywithrespecttoprecisetemporalestimationsofmindwandering.
Whileexperiencedmeditatorsarepreferableasparticipantsforthiscarefulwork,
studyingnovicesastheyengageinmeditationovertimemayofferanotherunique
opportunitytogainnewinsightsintothelandscapeofspontaneousthought.Forexample,
longitudinalstudiescouldexaminethetimecourseandtrajectoryofchangesinmeta-
awarenessandself-caughtmindwanderinginagroupofnovicesastheytraininFA
meditation.Frequencyandperiodicityofspontaneousthoughtcouldbetrackedeven
duringhomepractice,yieldingbehavioralinformationatalevelthathasnotbeenexplored
previously.Participantscouldalsobestudiedinlab-basedparadigmsdesignedtoprobe
meta-awareness,thusincreasingourunderstandingofhowthiscapacitycanbetrained
andfostered.Neuroimagingstudiescouldinvestigatewhetherandhowrepeated
meditationinfluencesactivitywithinbrainnetworksrelatedtocognitivecontrol.Finally,
changesinthecontentofspecificmindwanderingepisodesmaybedetectableovertime;it
istemptingtospeculatethatshiftstowardmorepositiveorother-focusedthoughtsmay
occuraspracticeproceeds(e.g.,Jazaierietal.,2015),althoughthisremainsanopen
questionforfutureresearch.
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 23
Conclusions
Thestudyofspontaneousthoughthasadvancedrapidlyinrecentyears.Asweseek
tofurtherrefineourunderstandingofboththephenomenologyandneuralunderpinnings
ofthisubiquitousmentalexperience,wewillneednovelmethodsofgatheringand
integratingfirst-personsubjectiveinformationintoexperimentaldesignandanalysis.In
thischapter,I’veexaminedthepracticeofFAmeditationasakindofself-caughtmind
wanderingparadigm,involvingrepeatedfluctuationsbetweenfocusedattentionandmind
wandering.Byconsideringthiscommoncontemplativepracticethroughthelensof
cognitiveresearch,numerousopportunitiesarisethatmayfurtherthestudyof
spontaneousthought.
Specifically,byleveragingtheenhancedabilityofexperiencedmeditatorstodetect
episodesofmindwanderingduringFAmeditation,researcherscouldobtainrichlydetailed
informationaboutthedurationandcontentofindividualepisodes.Thismaysubstantially
increaseanalyticalprecisioninthesearchforneuralcorrelatesofspontaneousthought,
allowingforaveragingacrossonlythoseepisodeswithsimilarcharacteristics.Suchatrial-
by-trialapproach,dovetailedwiththereportingabilitiesofexperiencedmeditators,may
holdgreatpromiseforadvancingourunderstandingofthemind’snaturalfluctuations.
Onabroaderscale,relyingmoreheavilyonsubjectiveinputtodriveanalysismay
helpusshifttowardamorenuancedapproachtothescientificstudyofconsciousness.Asit
becomesincreasinglyclearthatthemindisever-changingandstronglyinfluencedby
multiplecontexts,wemustfindalternativestotraditional,reductivemethodsthatassume
similaritiesacrossindividualsandevenacrossasingleindividual’svariedmental
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 24
experiences.Theintegrationoffirst-personinformationintoourresearchparadigmswill
beessentialifwearetodeeplyunderstandandhonorthetruecomplexityofhuman
thought.
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 25
References
Allen,M.,Smallwood,J.,Christensen,J.,Gramm,D.,Rasmussen,B.,Jensen,C.G.,…Lutz,A.(2013).
Thebalancedmind:thevariabilityoftask-unrelatedthoughtspredictserrormonitoring.
FrontiersinHumanNeuroscience,7(November),743.
http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00743
Andrews-Hanna,J.R.,Kaiser,R.H.,Turner,A.E.J.,Reineberg,A.E.,Godinez,D.,Dimidjian,S.,&
Banich,M.T.(2013).Apennyforyourthoughts:dimensionsofself-generatedthoughtcontent
andrelationshipswithindividualdifferencesinemotionalwellbeing.FrontiersinPsychology,
4(November),1–13.http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00900
Andrews-Hanna,J.R.,Reidler,J.S.,Huang,C.,&Buckner,R.L.(2010).Evidenceforthedefault
network’sroleinspontaneouscognition.JournalofNeurophysiology,104(1),322–35.
http://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00830.2009
Andrews-Hanna,J.R.,Smallwood,J.,&Spreng,R.N.(2014).Thedefaultnetworkandself-generated
thought:Componentprocesses,dynamiccontrol,andclinicalrelevance.AnnalsoftheNewYork
AcademyofSciences,1316(1),29–52.http://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12360
Awh,E.,&Pashler,H.(2000).Evidenceforsplitattentionalfoci.JournalofExperimentalPsychology.
HumanPerceptionandPerformance,26(2),834–846.http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-
1523.26.2.834
Baird,B.,Mrazek,M.D.,Phillips,D.T.,&Schooler,J.W.(2014).Domain-specificenhancementof
metacognitiveabilityfollowingmeditationtraining.JournalofExperimentalPsychology:
General,143(5),1972–1979.http://doi.org/10.1037/a0036882
Banks,J.B.,Welhaf,M.S.,&Srour,A.(2015).Theprotectiveeffectsofbriefmindfulnessmeditation
training.ConsciousnessandCognition,33,277–285.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.016
Black,L.I.,Clarke,T.C.,Barnes,P.M.,Stussman,B.J.,&Nahin,R.L.(2015).UseofComplementary
HealthApproachesAmongChildrenAged4–17YearsintheUnitedStates:NationalHealth
InterviewSurvey,2007–2012.NationalHealthStatisticsReports.Hyattsville,MD:National
CenterforHealthStatistics.
Brewer,J.a,Worhunsky,P.D.,Gray,J.R.,Tang,Y.-Y.,Weber,J.,&Kober,H.(2011).Meditation
experienceisassociatedwithdifferencesindefaultmodenetworkactivityandconnectivity.
ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciencesoftheUnitedStatesofAmerica,108(50),
20254–9.http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112029108
Buckner,R.L.,Andrews-Hanna,J.R.,&Schacter,D.L.(2008).Thebrain’sdefaultnetwork:anatomy,
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 26
function,andrelevancetodisease.AnnalsoftheNewYorkAcademyofSciences,1124,1–38.
http://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.011
Christoff,K.,Gordon,A.M.,Smallwood,J.,Smith,R.,&Schooler,J.W.(2009).Experiencesampling
duringfMRIrevealsdefaultnetworkandexecutivesystemcontributionstomindwandering.
ProcNatlAcadSciUSA,106(21),8719–8724.http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900234106
Corbetta,M.,Patel,G.,&Shulman,G.L.(2008).Thereorientingsystemofthehumanbrain:from
environmenttotheoryofmind.Neuron,58(3),306–324.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017
Curtis,C.E.,&D’Esposito,M.(2003).Persistentactivityintheprefrontalcortexduringworking
memory.TrendsinCognitiveSciences,7(9),415–423.
D’Esposito,M.(2007).Fromcognitivetoneuralmodelsofworkingmemory.Philosophical
TransactionsoftheRoyalSocietyB:BiologicalSciences,362(1481),761.
Dahl,C.J.,Lutz,A.,&Davidson,R.J.(2015).Reconstructinganddeconstructingtheself:Cognitive
mechanismsinmeditationpractice.TrendsinCognitiveSciences,19(9),515–523.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.001
Davey,C.G.,Pujol,J.,&Harrison,B.J.(2016).Mappingtheselfinthebrain’sdefaultmodenetwork.
NeuroImage,132,390–397.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.022
Dixon,M.L.,Fox,K.C.R.,&Christoff,K.(2014).Aframeworkforunderstandingtherelationship
betweenexternallyandinternallydirectedcognition.Neuropsychologia,62,321–330.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.024
Ellamil,M.,Fox,K.C.R.,Dixon,M.L.,Pritchard,S.,Todd,R.M.,Thompson,E.,&Christoff,K.(2016).
Dynamicsofneuralrecruitmentsurroundingthespontaneousarisingofthoughtsin
experiencedmindfulnesspractitioners.NeuroImage.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.034
Farb,N.A.S.,Segal,Z.V,&Anderson,A.K.(2013).Mindfulnessmeditationtrainingalterscortical
representationsofinteroceptiveattention.SocialCognitiveandAffectiveNeuroscience,8(1),
15–26.http://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss066
Fox,K.C.R.,Nijeboer,S.,Dixon,M.L.,Floman,J.L.,Ellamil,M.,Rumak,S.P.,…Christoff,K.(2014).Is
meditationassociatedwithalteredbrainstructure?Asystematicreviewandmeta-analysisof
morphometricneuroimaginginmeditationpractitioners.NeuroscienceandBiobehavioral
Reviews,43,48–73.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.016
Fox,K.C.R.,Spreng,R.N.,Ellamil,M.,Andrews-Hanna,J.R.,&Christoff,K.(2015).Thewandering
brain:Meta-analysisoffunctionalneuroimagingstudiesofmind-wanderingandrelated
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 27
spontaneousthoughtprocesses.NeuroImage,111,611–621.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.039
Garrison,K.A.,Zeffiro,T.A.,Scheinost,D.,Constable,R.T.,&Brewer,J.A.(2015).Meditationleads
toreduceddefaultmodenetworkactivitybeyondanactivetask.Cognitive,Affective&
BehavioralNeuroscience.http://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0358-3
Goyal,M.,Singh,S.,Sibinga,E.M.S.,Gould,N.F.,Rowland-Seymour,A.,Sharma,R.,…
Haythornthwaite,J.A.(2014).Meditationprogramsforpsychologicalstressandwell-being:A
systematicreviewandmeta-analysis.JAMAInternalMedicine.
http://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13018
Hasenkamp,W.(2014).Usingfirst-personreportsduringmeditationtoinvestigatebasiccognitive
experience.Meditation–NeuroscientificApproachesandPhilosophicalImplications,2,75–93.
http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01634-4
Hasenkamp,W.,&Barsalou,L.W.(2012).Effectsofmeditationexperienceonfunctional
connectivityofdistributedbrainnetworks.FrontiersinHumanNeuroscience,6(March),1–14.
http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00038
Hasenkamp,W.,Wilson-Mendenhall,C.D.,Duncan,E.,&Barsalou,L.W.(2012).Mindwandering
andattentionduringfocusedmeditation:afine-grainedtemporalanalysisoffluctuating
cognitivestates.NeuroImage,59(1),750–60.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.008
Hoffmann,F.,Banzhaf,C.,Kanske,P.,Bermpohl,F.,&Singer,T.(2016).Wherethedepressedmind
wanders:Self-generatedthoughtpatternsasassessedthroughexperiencesamplingasastate
markerofdepression.JournalofAffectiveDisorders,198,127–134.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.005
Jang,J.H.,Jung,W.H.,Kang,D.-H.,Byun,M.S.,Kwon,S.J.,Choi,C.-H.,&Kwon,J.S.(2011).Increased
defaultmodenetworkconnectivityassociatedwithmeditation.NeuroscienceLetters,487(3),
358–362.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.10.056
Jazaieri,H.,Lee,I.a.,McGonigal,K.,Jinpa,T.,Doty,J.R.,Gross,J.J.,&Goldin,P.R.(2015).A
wanderingmindisalesscaringmind:Dailyexperiencesamplingduringcompassion
meditationtraining.TheJournalofPositivePsychology,9760(July),1–14.
http://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1025418
Jha,A.P.,Krompinger,J.,&Baime,M.J.(2007).Mindfulnesstrainingmodifiessubsystemsof
attention.CognAffectBehavNeurosci,7(2),109–119.Retrievedfrom
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractP
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 28
lus&list_uids=17672382
Jha,A.P.,Morrison,A.B.,Dainer-Best,J.,Parker,S.,Rostrup,N.,&Stanley,E.A.(2015).Minds“at
attention”:Mindfulnesstrainingcurbsattentionallapsesinmilitarycohorts.PLoSONE,10(2),
1–19.http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116889
Jha,A.P.,Morrison,A.B.,Parker,S.C.,&Stanley,E.A.(2016).PracticeIsProtective:Mindfulness
TrainingPromotesCognitiveResilienceinHigh-StressCohorts.Mindfulness.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0465-9
Josipovic,Z.(2014).Neuralcorrelatesofnondualawarenessinmeditation.AnnalsoftheNewYork
AcademyofSciences,1307(1),9–18.http://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12261
Killingsworth,M.,&Gilbert,D.(2010).Awanderingmindisanunhappymind.Science(NewYork,
NY),330(6006),932.Retrievedfrompapers://b2816fd0-bd65-41d2-9aff-
25c27c501990/Paper/p441
Klimecki,O.M.,Leiberg,S.,Lamm,C.,&Singer,T.(2013).Functionalneuralplasticityandassociated
changesinpositiveaffectaftercompassiontraining.CerebralCortex,23(7),1552–1561.
http://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs142
Kramer,A.F.,&Hahn,S.(1995).Splittingthebeam:distributionofattentionovernoncontiguous
regionsofthevisualfiel.PsychologicalScience,6(6),381–386.http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-
9280.1995.tb00530.x
LeVanQuyen,M.,&Petitmengin,C.(2002).Neuronaldynamicsandconsciousexperience-An
exampleofreciprocalcausationbeforeepilepticseizures.PhenomenologyandtheCognitive
Sciences,1,169–180.http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020364003336
Levinson,D.B.,Stoll,E.L.,Kindy,S.D.,Merry,H.L.,&Davidson,R.J.(2014).Amindyoucancount
on :validatingbreathcountingasabehavioralmeasureofmindfulness.Frontiersin
Psychology,5(October),1–10.http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01202
Lutz,A.,Greischar,L.L.,Rawlings,N.B.,Ricard,M.,&Davidson,R.J.(2004).Gammasynchrony
duringmentalpractice.Pnas,101(46),16369–16373.
http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407401101
Lutz,A.,Slagter,H.A.,Dunne,J.D.,&Davidson,R.J.(2008).Attentionregulationandmonitoringin
meditation.TrendsinCognitiveSciences,12(4),163–169.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.005
Lutz,A.,Slagter,H.A.,Rawlings,N.B.,Francis,A.D.,Greischar,L.L.,&Davidson,R.J.(2009).Mental
trainingenhancesattentionalstability:Neuralandbehavioralevidence.Journalof
Neuroscience,29(42),13418–13427.http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1614-09.2009
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 29
Lutz,A.,&Thompson,E.(2003).Neurophenomenologyintegratingsubjectiveexperienceandbrain
dynamicsintheneuroscienceofconsciousness.JournalofConsciousnessStudies,10,9(10),31–
52.Retrievedfrom
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractP
lus&list_uids=12726911162577704044related:bNRltUUSn7AJ
MacLean,K.A.,Ferrer,E.,Aichele,S.R.,Bridwell,D.A.,Zanesco,A.P.,Jacobs,T.L.,…Saron,C.D.
(2010).Intensivemeditationtrainingimprovesperceptualdiscriminationandsustained
attention.PsycholSci,21(6),829–839.http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610371339
Malinowski,P.(2013).Neuralmechanismsofattentionalcontrolinmindfulnessmeditation.
FrontiersinNeuroscience,7,8.http://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00008
Mason,M.F.,Norton,M.I.,Horn,J.D.Van,Wegner,D.M.,Grafton,S.T.,&Macrae,C.N.(2007).
Wanderingminds:thedefaultnetworkandstimulus-independentthought.Science,315(5810),
393–395.http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131295
McMahan,D.L.(2008).TheMakingofBuddhistModernism.NewYork,NY:OxfordUniversityPress.
Menon,V.,&Uddin,L.Q.(2010).Saliency,switching,attentionandcontrol:anetworkmodelof
insulafunction.BrainStructureandFunction,214(5-6),655–667.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0.Saliency
Metzinger,T.(2013).Themythofcognitiveagency:Subpersonalthinkingasacyclicallyrecurring
lossofmentalautonomy.FrontiersinPsychology,4(DEC),1–19.
http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00931
Miller,E.K.,&Cohen,J.D.(2001).Anintegrativetheoryofprefrontalcortexfunction.AnnRev
Neuroscience,24(1),167.
Mooneyham,B.W.,Mrazek,M.D.,Mrazek,A.J.,&Schooler,J.W.(2016).Signalornoise:brain
networkinteractionsunderlyingtheexperienceandtrainingofmindfulness.AnnalsoftheNew
YorkAcademyofSciences,(5),n/a–n/a.http://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13044
Morrison,A.B.,Goolsarran,M.,Rogers,S.L.,&Jha,A.P.(2014).Tamingawanderingattention:
short-formmindfulnesstraininginstudentcohorts.FrontiersinHumanNeuroscience,
7(January),897.http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00897
Mrazek,M.D.,Franklin,M.S.,Phillips,D.T.,Baird,B.,&Schooler,J.W.(2013).Mindfulnesstraining
improvesworkingmemorycapacityandGREperformancewhilereducingmindwandering.
PsychologicalScience,24,776–81.http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612459659
Mrazek,M.D.,Smallwood,J.,&Schooler,J.W.(2012).Mindfulnessandmind-wandering:finding
convergencethroughopposingconstructs.Emotion(Washington,D.C.),12(3),442–448.
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 30
http://doi.org/10.1037/a0026678
Müller,M.M.,Malinowski,P.,Gruber,T.,&Hillyard,S.a.(2003).Sustaineddivisionofthe
attentionalspotlight.Nature,424(6946),309–312.http://doi.org/10.1038/nature02148
Petitmengin,C.(2006).Describingone’ssubjectiveexperienceinthesecondperson:Aninterview
methodforthescienceofconsciousness.PhenomenologyandtheCognitiveSciences,5(3-4),
229–269.http://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-006-9022-2
Posner,M.I.,&Petersen,S.E.(1990).Theattentionsystemofthehumanbrain.AnnuRevNeurosci,
13,25–42.http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325
Raichle,M.E.(2015).TheBrain’sDefaultModeNetwork.AnnualReviewofNeuroscience,(April),
413–427.http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030
Ruby,F.J.M.,Smallwood,J.,Engen,H.,&Singer,T.(2013).Howself-generatedthoughtshapes
mood:Therelationbetweenmind-wanderingandmooddependsonthesocio-temporal
contentofthoughts.PLoSONE,8(10).http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077554
Sahdra,B.K.,MacLean,K.A.,Ferrer,E.,Shaver,P.R.,Rosenberg,E.L.,Jacobs,T.L.,Saron,C.D.
(2011).Enhancedresponseinhibitionduringintensivemeditationtrainingpredicts
improvementsinself-reportedadaptivesocioemotionalfunctioning.Emotion,11,299–312.
Retrievedfromhttp://psycnet.apa.org/?&fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/a0022764
Sayadaw,M.(2002).FundamentalsofVipassanaMeditation.http://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-
0173-7.2
Schooler,J.W.,Smallwood,J.,Christoff,K.,Handy,T.C.,Reichle,E.D.,&Sayette,M.A.(2011).Meta-
awareness,perceptualdecouplingandthewanderingmind.TrendsinCognitiveSciences,15(7),
319–326.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006
Seeley,W.W.,Menon,V.,Schatzberg,A.F.,Keller,J.,Glover,G.H.,Kenna,H.,…Greicius,M.D.(2007).
Dissociableintrinsicconnectivitynetworksforsalienceprocessingandexecutivecontrol.
JournalofNeuroscience,27(9),2349–2356.http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007
Slagter,H.A.,Lutz,A.,Greischar,L.L.,Francis,A.D.,Nieuwenhuis,S.,Davis,J.M.,&Davidson,R.J.
(2007).Mentaltrainingaffectsdistributionoflimitedbrainresources.PLoSBiology,5(6),
1228–1235.http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050138
Smallwood,J.,Fishman,D.J.,&Schooler,J.W.(2007).Countingthecostofanabsentmind:mind
wanderingasanunderrecognizedinfluenceoneducationalperformance.PsychonomicBulletin
&Review,14(2),230–236.http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194057
Smallwood,J.,&Schooler,J.W.(2006).Therestlessmind.PsycholBull,132(6),946–958.
http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 31
Smallwood,J.,&Schooler,J.W.(2015).Thescienceofmindwandering:Empiricallynavigatingthe
streamofconsciousness.AnnualReviewofPsychology,66(1),487–518.
http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331
Sridharan,D.,Levitin,D.J.,&Menon,V.(2008).Acriticalrolefortherightfronto-insularcortexin
switchingbetweencentral-executiveanddefault-modenetworks.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA,
105(34),12569–12574.http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800005105
Stawarczyk,D.,Majerus,S.,Maquet,P.,&D’Argembeau,A.(2011).Neuralcorrelatesofongoing
consciousexperience:Bothtask-unrelatednessandstimulus-independencearerelatedto
defaultnetworkactivity.PLoSONE,6(2).http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016997
Sze,J.A.,Gyurak,A.,Yuan,J.,&Levenson,R.W.(2010).Coherencebetweenemotionalexperience
andphysiology:Doesbodyawarenesstraininghaveanimpact?Emotion,10(6),803–814.
http://doi.org/doi:10.1037/a0020146
Tang,Y.-Y.,Hölzel,B.K.,&Posner,M.I.(2015).Theneuroscienceofmindfulnessmeditation.Nature
ReviewsNeuroscience,16(4),213–225.http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3916
Taylor,V.A.,Daneault,V.,Grant,J.,Scavone,G.,Breton,E.,Roffe-vidal,S.,…Beauregard,M.(2013).
Impactofmeditationtrainingonthedefaultmodenetworkduringarestfulstate.Social
CognitiveandAffectiveNeuroscience,8(1),4–14.http://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr087
Uddin,L.Q.(2014).Salienceprocessingandinsularcorticalfunctionanddysfunction.Nature
ReviewsNeuroscience,16(1),55–61.http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3857
vanVugt,M.K.,&Broers,N.(2016).Self-ReportedStickinessofMind-WanderingAffectsTask
Performance.FrontiersinPsychology,7(May),1–8.http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00732
Varela,F.J.(1996).Neurophenomenology:Amethodologicalremedyforthehardproblem.Journal
ofConsciousnessStudies,3(4),330–349.
Varela,F.J.,Thompson,E.,&Rosch,E.(1992).TheEmbodiedMind:CognitiveScienceandHuman
Experience.MITPress.
Wallace,B.A.(2006).TheAttentionRevolution:UnlockingthePoweroftheFocusedMind.Somerville,
MA:WisdomPublications.
Zanesco,A.P.,King,B.G.,Maclean,K.a,&Saron,C.D.(2013).Executivecontrolandfelt
concentrativeengagementfollowingintensivemeditationtraining.FrontiersinHuman
Neuroscience,7(September),566.http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00566
Zanesco,A.P.,King,B.G.,MacLean,K.A.,Jacobs,T.L.,Aichele,S.R.,Wallace,B.A.,…Saron,C.D.
(2016).Meditationtraininginfluencesmindwanderingandmindlessreading.Psychologyof
Consciousness:Theory,Research,andPractice,3(1),12–33.
ForthcomingchapterinTheOxfordHandbookofSpontaneousThought 32
http://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000082
Zedelius,C.M.,Broadway,J.M.,&Schooler,J.W.(2015).Motivatingmeta-awarenessofmind
wandering:Awaytocatchthemindinflight?ConsciousnessandCognition,36,44–53.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.016