Catering For Gifted Students In Unit Planning:
Models and Strategies of Differentiation
Framework For Gifted Education
To ensure effective provision for individual students who are gifted, state schools need to consider a range of options for their curriculum and their school organisation. These include identification procedures, differentiated curriculum and acceleration.
(Dept of Education and The Arts, 2004, p. 1)
Overview
• Curriculum Differentiation - definitions• Why do we need to differentiate the
curriculum• Types of learners• A Model For Differentiation- Maker
Model• Practical Strategies for differentiating
curriculum
Also known as:
–Differentiated Instruction
–Multilevel instruction
What is Curriculum DifferentiationCURRICULUM DIFFERENTIATION is a broad term referring to the need to tailor teaching environments and practices to create appropriately different learning experiences for different students. Keirouz (1993) suggests typical procedures in the case of gifted and talented students include:
• deleting already mastered material from existing curriculum,
• adding new content, process, or product expectations to existing curriculum,
• extending existing curriculum to provide enrichment activities,
• providing course work for able students at an earlier age than usual, and
• writing new units or courses that meet the needs of gifted students.
(http://www.gifted-children.com.au/link/resources/curriculum_differentiation, accessed 12 June, 2004)
When we recognise the diversity of the learners in our classrooms and provide for their diverse learning needs in our planning, we differentiate the curriculum.
(Braggett, 1997)
… a set of planned learning experiences that are designed to meet the specific needs of learners (Eddie Braggett,1997).
A program that is qualitatively (rather than quantitatively) different from the basic curriculum… (Maker, 1982).
To differentiate instruction is to recognize students varying background knowledge, readiness, language, preferences in learning, interests, and to react responsively. Differentiated instruction is a process to approach teaching and learning for students of differing abilities in the same class. The intent of differentiating instruction is to maximize each student’s growth and individual success by meeting each student where he or she is, and assisting in the
learning process.
http://www.cast.org/ncac/index.cfm?i=2876 (accessed 12 June 2004)
Differentiated Curriculum refers to teaching that is adapted to take into account the individual differences and needs of students in any one classroom.
It comprises modifications to the curriculum, teaching structures, and teaching practices in combination to ensure that instruction is relevant, flexible and responsive, leading to successful achievement and the development of students as self-regulated learners.
(van Kraayenoord, 1997)
In a way, it's just shaking up the classroom so it's a better fit for more kids.
Carol Ann Tomlinson Associate Professor of Educational Leadership,
Foundations, and Policy The Curry School of Education, University of Virginia
From an interview with Leslie J. Kiernan, 1996
Why Differentiate?
• All students should be given an opportunity to develop to their full potential.
• For most students the regular classroom will provide appropriate challenge.
• For gifted learners special provision must be made in the regular classroom if they are to have the same exciting and challenging learning experiences as their classmates.
• Gifted students need the opportunity to work through the curriculum at a faster pace and need less time on basics and revision.
Learner Profiles
We need to consider differences in:
Learning rates Abilities Prior knowledge Interests Preferred learning styles Affective needs
We must take into account:
Ways students take in information
Amount of time to complete work
Assignment or tasks Means to assess what
has been learned
Characteristics Of Gifted LearnersGifted learners may display some or all of these traits:
The ability to learn new materials in much less time and in greater depth
The ability to readily retain a quantity of information The ability to handle complex and abstract ideas The ability to simultaneously focus on a number of tasks Have intense interests and passions Draw generalizations about seemingly unconnected
concepts Ask provocative questions
Susan Winebrenner (2000)
Differentiation Can Be For:
• The Gifted
And For
• In Class (mixed ability differentiation)
What Can We Differentiate?
PROCESS
CONTENT
PRODUCT LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
Maker Model of Curriculum Differentiation
The Maker Model
• June Maker• 1982• Differentiation requires modification of four
primary areas of curriculum development:– Content– Process– Product– Learning environment
ContentWhat we teach
Amount and type of new content
Degree of complexity and abstractness
Number and sophistication of resources
Depth of study
Use of specific methods of inquiry
Learner interests
• PRE-TESTING!!• Curriculum Compacting• Abstraction, more
advanced concepts• Learning Contracts• Flexible pacing
• Thematic, broad-based integrative content
• Interdisciplinary approach
•Acceleration
Content• Several elements and materials are used to support instructional content.
– These include acts, concepts, generalizations or principles, attitudes, and skills. – The variation seen in a differentiated classroom is most frequently the manner in which
students gain access to important learning. – Access to the content is seen as key.
• Align tasks and objectives to learning goals. – Designers of differentiated instruction determine as essential the alignment of tasks with
instructional goals and objectives. – Goals are most frequently assessed by many high-stakes tests at the state level and
frequently administered standardized measures. – Objectives are frequently written in incremental steps resulting in a continuum of skills-building
tasks. – An objectives-driven menu makes it easier to find the next instructional step for learners
entering at varying levels.
• Instruction is concept-focused and principle-driven. – The instructional concepts should be broad based and not focused on minute details or
unlimited facts. – Teachers must focus on the concepts, principles and skills that students should learn.– The content of instruction should address the same concepts with all students but be adjusted
by degree of complexity for the diversity of learners in the classroom.
http://www.cast.org/ncac/index.cfm?i=2876 (accessed 27 May 2004)
ProcessHow we teach
Thinking complexity
Learning pace
Learning style
Thinking creativity
Active decision-making
• Thinking models- Hats, Blooms, Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences
• Critical and creative Thinking Skills (HOTS)• Independent Study - student choice of topic for
study• Use of advanced novels/texts• Problem-based curriculum• Active Investigation and Discovery Learning• Simulations• Concept Mapping• Open-ended questions• Research skills• Use of technology• Student/adult mentors• Tiered lessons• Learning Centres with advanced tasks• Cooperative Learning• Use of Graphic Organisers
Process• Flexible grouping is consistently used.
– Strategies for flexible grouping are essential. – Learners are expected to interact and work together as they develop knowledge of
new content. – Teachers may conduct whole-class introductory discussions of content big ideas
followed by small group or pair work. – Student groups may be coached from within or by the teacher to complete assigned
tasks.– Grouping of students is not fixed. – Based on the content, project, and on-going evaluations, grouping and regrouping
must be a dynamic process as one of the foundations of differentiated instruction.
• Classroom management benefits students and teachers.– Teachers must consider organization and instructional delivery strategies to
effectively operate a classroom using differentiated instruction. – Carol Tomlinson (2001) identifies 17 key strategies for teachers to successfully meet
the challenge of designing and managing differentiated instruction in her text How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms, Chapter 7.
http://www.cast.org/ncac/index.cfm?i=2876 (accessed 27 May 2004)
ProductWhat we expect students to do or show
Tasks that reflect:
Learning levelsInterestsLearning StylesMultiple IntelligencesOpen-endednessMetacognitionReal audiencesPurposeful deadlinesShared development of
criteria for quality
• Real World Problems
• Open-ended Tasks• Advanced projects, tasks,
assignments• PEP
• Tiered tasks
• Reflection Journals• Written/recorded response as well
as oral response• Products that reflect student’s
preferred learning style• Synthesise rather than summarise
information
• Should include a self-evaluation process
Product• Initial and on-going assessment of student readiness and growth are essential
– Meaningful pre-assessment naturally leads to functional and successful differentiation. – Assessments may be formal or informal, including interviews, surveys, performance
assessments, and more formal evaluation procedures.– Incorporating pre and on-going assessment informs teachers to better provide a menu of
approaches, choices, and scaffolds for the varying needs, interests and abilities that exist in classrooms of diverse students.
• Students are active and responsible explorers – Teachers respect that each task put before the learner will be interesting, engaging, and
accessible to essential understanding and skills. – Each child should feel challenged most of the time.
• Vary expectations and requirements for student responses – Items to which students respond may be differentiated for students to demonstrate or
express their knowledge and understanding. – A well-designed student product allows varied means of expression, alternative
procedures, and provides varying degrees of difficulty, types of evaluation, and scoring.
http://www.cast.org/ncac/index.cfm?i=2876 (accessed 27 May 2004)
• Think of a specific activity that your students participated in today in your classroom
• NOW place that activity on the ladder to indicate its complexity
• Differentiate the activity in two directions- one incorporating more high level thinking and the other to provide scaffolding
• Think about the students in your class and which of the versions of the activity they would most benefit from
Learning EnvironmentWhere we teach/our class culture
Student-centred
Encouraging independence
Open to new ideas, materials, people
Accepting of others’ ideas and opinions
Freedom of movement, mobile
Flexible use of time
• Variety of resources• Extension of learning
beyond the classroom• Flexible groupings• Opportunities to work
alone• Learning centres• Cooperative learning
Learning EnvironmentP
re-a
sses
smen
t
Curriculum
(State directives and school based programs)
KLA
Outcomes
Student
Readiness
Talents/Interests
Prior knowledge
Content
What we teach
Process
How we teach
Assessment
Product
What we expect students to do or show
Su
mm
ative evaluation
(Adapted from Oaksford and Jones, 2001)
Planning for differentiation
Synthesising Phase
Enhancing Phase
Orientating
Phase
AssessmentDifferentiation/
Intervention Strategies
Passow’s Test of Appropriate Curriculum for the Gifted
• Children should be introduced to materials and activities which would be beyond the capabilities of their age-peers of average ability.
• Teachers should ask:– Would all students want to be involved in such learning
experiences?– Could all students participate in such learning
experiences?– Should all students be expected to succeed in such
learning experiences.
(Passow 1988)
Not More of the SAME!!
XMOTS
Comparing Classrooms• Student differences are masked or acted upon
when problematic• Assessment is most common at the end of the
learning to see who “got it”• A relatively narrow sense of intelligence prevails• A single definition of excellence exists• Student interest is infrequently tapped• Relatively few learning profile options are taken
into account• Whole-class instruction dominates• Coverage of texts and curriculum guides drives
instruction• Mastery of facts and skills out of context are the
focus of learning• Single option assignments are the norm• Time is relatively inflexible• A single test prevails• Single interpretation of ideas and events may be
sought• The teacher directs student behaviour• The teacher solves problems• The teacher provides whole-class standards for
grading• A single form of assessment is often used
• Student differences are studied as a basis for planning
• Assessment is ongoing and diagnostic to understand how to make instruction more responsive to learner need
• Focus on multiple forms of intelligences is evident• Excellence is defined in large measure by individual
growth from a starting point• Students are frequently guided in making interest-
based learning choices• Many instructional arrangements are used• Student readiness, interest and learning profile
shape instruction• Multi-option assessments are frequently used• Time is used flexibly in accordance with student
need• Multiple materials are provided• Multiple perspectives on ideas and events are
routinely sought• The teacher facilitates students’ skills at becoming
more self-reliant learners• Students help other students and the teacher solve
problems• Students work with the teacher to establish both
whole-class and individual learning goals• Students are assessed in multiple ways
Tomlinson, A (1999). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of all Learners (some chapters available online at http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/1999tomlinson/1999tomlinsontoc.html, accessed 21 June 2004)
Elaborations• Not all students are alike. • Differentiated instruction applies an approach to teaching
and learning so that students have multiple options for taking in information and making sense of ideas.
• The model of differentiated instruction requires teachers to be flexible in their approach to teaching and adjusting the curriculum and presentation of information to learners rather than expecting students to modify themselves for the curriculum.
• Classroom teaching should be a blend of whole-class, group and individual instruction.
• Differentiated Instruction is a teaching theory based on the premise that instructional approaches should vary and be adapted in relation to individual and diverse students in
classrooms.
Guidelines that make differentiation possible for teachers to attain:
• Clarify key concepts and generalizations to ensure that all learners gain powerful understandings that serve as the foundation for future learning. Teachers are encouraged to identify essential concepts and instructional foci to ensure all learners comprehend.
• Use assessment as a teaching tool to extend versus merely measure instruction. Assessment should occur before, during, and following the instructional episode, and help to pose questions regarding student needs and optimal learning.
• Emphasize critical and creative thinking as a goal in lesson design. The tasks, activities, and procedures for students should require that students understand and apply meaning. Instruction may require supports, additional motivation, varied tasks, materials, or equipment for different students in the classroom.
• Engaging all learners is essential. Teachers are encouraged to strive for development of lessons that are engaging and motivating for a diverse class of students. Vary tasks within instruction as well as across students. In other words, and entire session for students should not consist of all drill and practice, or any single structure or activity.
• Provide a balance between teacher-assigned and student-selected tasks. A balanced working structure is optimal in a differentiated classroom. Based on pre-assessment information, the balance will vary from class-to-class as well as lesson-to-lesson. Teachers should assure that students have choices in their learning.
http://www.cast.org/ncac/index.cfm?i=2876 (accessed 27 May 2004)
Print Resources• Braggett, E. (1994). Developing programs for gifted students: A
total school approach. Highett, Vic.: Hawker Brownlow.• Braggett, E. (1997). Differentiated programs for primary
schools: Units of work for gifted and talented students. Chelterham, Vic.: Hawker Brownlow.
• Eyre, D & McClure, L. (2001). Curriculum provision for the gifted and talented in the primary school. London: David Fulton Publishers.
• Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners, grades 3-12. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing.
• Renzulli, J. (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Highett, Vic.:Hawker Brownlow
• Renzulli, J. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Chelterham, Vic.: Hawker Brownlow.
Links to Learn More About Differentiated Instruction
• Differentiated Curriculum Information on The Learning Place http://www.learningplace.com.au/deliver/content.asp?pid=14958 contains definition, guidelines, frameworks and proformas for differentiated units as well as a range of practical strategies.
• Guild, P.B., and Garger, S (1998). What Is Differentiated Instruction? Marching to Different Drummers 2nd Ed. (ASCD, p.2) http://www.ascd.org/pdi/demo/diffinstr/differentiated1.html
Initially published in 1985, Marching to Different Drummers was one of the first sources to pull together information on what was a newly-flourishing topic in education. Part I defines style and looks at the history of style research; Part II describes applications of style in seven areas; Part III identifies common questions and discusses implementation and staff development.
• Hall, Tracey. (2003). Differentiated Instruction.http://www.cast.org/ncac/index.cfm?i=2876
• Tomlinson, C.A., (1995). Differentiating instruction for advanced learners in the mixed-ability middle school classroom. ERIC Digest E536. http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed389141.html
The ability to differentiate instruction for middle school aged learners is a challenge. Responding to the diverse students needs found in inclusive, mixed-ability classrooms is particularly difficult. This digest provides an overview of some key principles for differentiating instruction, with an emphasis on the learning needs of academically advanced students.
• Web Article: Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. http://www.ascd.org/pdi/demo/diffinstr/tomlinson2.html
Carol Ann Tomlinson, an Associate Professor of Educational Leadership, Foundations and Policy at the Curry School of Education, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA provides an article entitled; Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57,1.
• The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) Web site www.ascd.org/pdi/demo/diffinstr/differentiated1.html
A site by ASCD (2000). which discusses differentiated instruction. Page links to other pages with examples from a high school* and elementary school*, key characteristics of a differentiated classroom, benefits, related readings, discussion, and related links to explore. *might be good to look at for case story ideas
• Holloway, J.H., (2000). Preparing Teachers for Differentiated Instruction. Educational Leadership, 58 (1). http://web.uvic.ca/~jdurkin/edd401su/Differentiated.html
This site is from an education course by Dr. John Durkin. It includes a diagram with suggestions for approaches to differentiated instruction. It also includes a listing of what differentiated instruction is and is not, rules of thumb on how to instruct, and management strategies.
• Theroux, P. (2001). Enhance Learning with Technology. Differential Instruction. www.cssd.ab.ca/tech/oth/learn/differentiating.htm
Theroux provides a thorough site on differential instruction for a Canadian school district. Provides links to teacher attitudes, learning strategies, teacher resources, integrating technology, integrating outcomes, exploring projects, sample lesson plans*, planning projects, thinking skills, developing Web pages, assessing, and tutorials.
• Differentiated Instruction: Sources of Information
http://tst1160-35.k12.fsu.edu/mainpage.html
A site with sources about differentiated instruction plus links to lesson plans for Elementary and Middle school, and a differentiated instruction lesson template.
Links to Learn More About Differentiated Instruction
Links to Learn More About Differentiated Instruction
• Differentiating Instruction www.ascd.org/pdi/demo/diffinstr/differentiated1.html (accessed 1 April 2004)
• Elements Integrated into Curricula http://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/metks4/curricul/k-s4curr/elements.html (accessed 1 April 2004)
• Partners in Enrichment: Preparing teachers for multiple classrooms www.cec.sped.org/bk/martec.html (accessed 1 April 2004)
• Selected ERIC Abstracts on Differentiated Instruction http://www.ascd.org/educationnews/eric/differinstructionabs.html (accessed 1 April 2004)