Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources
(PITZ Experience)Mikhail Krasilnikov (DESY) for the PITZ Team
Content:• Photo cathode laser system at PITZ• Temporal pulse shaping – flat-top profile:
• rise/fall time impact• flat-top modulations studies
• Transverse laser distribution influence• Advanced pulse shaping of the cathode laser: 3D ellipsoid• Summary
ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources, March 5-9, 2012Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 2
Yb:YAG laser at PITZ with integrated optical sampling system
Two-stage Yb:YAG double-pass amplifier
G ~ 40
Emicro= 0.002 mJ
Emicro~ 80 mJ
Emicro= 0.002 mJ
Emicro~ 2 mJ
LBO BBO
UV output pulsesEmicro~ 10 mJ
Optical Sampling System (OSS)
scanning amplifier(Yb:KGW)Yb:YAG power regen
G ~ 106
Pulseselector
pulse shaper
Highly-stable Yb:YAG oscillator
pulse selector Nonlinear
fiber amplifier Resolution: t < 0.5…1 ps
t ~ 1.7 ps
PITZ Photo cathode laser (Max-Born-Institute, Berlin)
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 3
Multicrystal birefringent pulse shaper containing 13 crystals
FWHM = 25 ps
edge10-90 ~ 2.2 ps
edge10-90 ~ 2 ps
birefringent shaper, 13 crystals
OSS signal (UV)
temperature controlled
birefringent crystal
motorized rotationstage
Gaussianinput
pulses
Shaped ouput
pulses
Will, Klemz, Optics Express 16 (2008) , 4922-14935
Photo cathode laser: temporal pulse shaping
FWHM ~ 11 ps
FWHM ~7 ps
FWHM ~ 17 ps
FWHM ~ 2 ps
FWHM ~ 11 ps
FWHM ~7 ps
FWHM ~ 17 ps
FWHM ~ 2 ps
Gaussian:
FWHM ~ 20 ps
Simulated pulse-stacker FWHM ~ 24 ps
FWHM ~ 24 ps
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 4
Photo cathode laser: flat-top temporal pulse profiles
Laser temporal profile used for the emittance optimization at various bunch charge levels
-14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
02.05.2011, 2nC-optimization
07.05.2011, 1nC-optimization
12.04.2011, 0.25nC-optimization
12.04.2011, 0.1nC-optimization
30.04.2011, 0.02nC-optimization
t, ps
norm
. las
er in
tens
ity, a
.u.
FWHM=(21.20±0.33)psrise time=(2.02±0.11)psfall time=(2.62±0.13)ps
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2 3 4 5 6 7rise/fall time, ps
emitt
, mm
mra
d
measured XY-emittance
simulated XY-emittance
Check effect on rise/fall time – results of 2009
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2 3 4 5 6 7rise/fall time, ps
emitt
, mm
mra
d
EmXEmY
• Q=1nC• Imainoptimized• Gun: +6deg off-crest• Booster: on-crest• Laser: temp FWHM~20ps, BSA=1.5mm
• In 2009 it was not possible to measure the effect with current machine stability
•After the improvement of the phase stability the effect is planned to be rechecked (this year)
Best measurements(22.08.2009M)
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 6
-18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
2,0
Temporal laser shapesused for the simulation
flat top 5 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 75 % 100%
inte
nsity
, Q n
orm
.
time, ps
-18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
2,0
flat top 5 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 75 % 100%
Temporal laser shapesused for the simulation
inte
nsity
, Q n
orm
.
time, ps
-18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
2,0
flat top 5 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 75 % 100%
Temporal laser shapesused for the simulation
inte
nsity
, Q n
orm
.
time, ps
-18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
2,0 flat top 5 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 75 % 100%
Temporal laser shapesused for the simulation
inte
nsity
, Q n
orm
.
time, ps
Various laser temporal flat-top modulationsSimulations
0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,00,60
0,65
0,70
0,75
0,80
0,85
0,90
0,95
1,00
1,05
1,10
1,15
1,20
2 peaks 3 peaks 4 peaks 5 peaks
emitt
ance
(mm
mra
d)
modulation depth
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Simulated optimum emittance vs.modulation depth
em
ittan
ce c
hang
e (%
)
• higher modulation frequency larger emittance growth rate• reliable simulations for modulations with >5 peaks are
difficult
simulations with gun on-crest, other parameters optimized
2 peaks
3 peaks
4 peaks
5 peaks
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 7
Laser temporal profile modulationsExperiment: measurements in 2009
0 20 40 60 80 1000,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
2,0
2,2simulation
2 peaks 3 peaks 4 peaks
experiment2 peaks on crest +6 deg3 peaks on crest +6 deg4 peaks on crest +6 deg
emitt
ance
(mm
mra
d)
modulation depth (%)
Experimental results compared to simulations
2 peaks
3 peaks
4 peaks
default
In 2009 it was not possible to measure the effect with the current machine stability
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 8
Measurements with / without modulations on the temporal laser distribution
with modulationswithout modulations
Approach detuning of an aligned pulse shaper, i.e. by purpose introducing modulations on the flat-top of the temporal laser distribution and measuring momentum distribution in HEDA
Laser temporal profiles
Electron beam longitudinal momentum distribution
Electron beam longitudinal momentum distribution
Machine conditions: gun: on-crest booster: +10deg off-crest bunch charge: 500pC
(5 laser pulses used) (1 laser pulse used)
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 9
• Resonantly driven plasma wave high tranformation ratio 5 Bunchlets inside the bunch:
Studies for Particle Driven Plasma Acceleration @PITZ
• Self-modulation without seed but with flat-top modulation:
• Self-modulation with seed pulse:
to be sent to bunch compres-sor
mradmmxy 448.0
mradmmxy 471.0
,45.48 mxy m
,25.83 mxy m
mmz 311.0
mmLb 05.4,50pCQ
,10pCQ
Flat-top:
Gauss:
1231 1069.3][ cmnb
1332 1005.1][ cmnb
1bn2bn
Photo cathode laser distributions
Output parameters for 2 sub-bunches @6.28m from cathode:
probe bunch
V
V
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 10
Photo cathode laser: transverse pulse shaping
laser spot at “virtual cathode”
Beam Shaping Aperture (BSA) plate is now replaced by an iris with remotely tunable opening
imaging of the BSA onto the photo cathode
laser beam steering
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 11
Photo cathode laser: transverse distributions
BSA=1.2mm (1nC)
RMS sizes (no Gaussian fit!)x=0.30 mm and y=0.29 mm
RMS sizes (no Gaussian fit!)x=0.13 mm and y=0.12 mm
BSA=0.5mm (0.1nC)
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 12
“Fresh Cathode Effect” studies 07.05.2011 > 07.05.2011M – “Old” cathode (#110.2) best 1nC machine setup (+cathode measurements: dark current, QE maps)> 07.05.2011N – “New” (fresh) cathode (#11.3) best 1nC machine setup (+cathode measurements : dark current, QE maps)
Old cathode #110.2 QE-map New cathode #11.3 QE-mapCathode laser Cathode laser
07.05.2011M3x3 stat:X-emit=0.742±0.021Y-emit=0.782±0.028XY-emit=0.761±0.022
07.05.2011N: 3x3 stat:Xemit=0.724±0.056Y-emit=0.603±0.038XY-emit=0.661±0.046
e-beam at EMSY1
e-beam at EMSY1
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 13
Laser pulse shaping studies for further improvement of the electron beam quality in a photo injector
cylindrical 3D ellipsoidal
temporallyGaussian
(e.g. FLASH)Trms=4.4ps
Flat-top(e.g PITZ)
FWHM~20ps, rt~2ps
222SpChRFcath
min :shapelaser cathode SpCh
Beam dynamics (ASTRA) simulations for PITZ-1.8 setup
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 14
BD simulations for bunch charge 1 nC
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
0 2 4 6 8 10z, m
mm
mra
d
Xemit (Gaussian 4.4ps)
Xemit (flat-top)
Xemit (ellipsoid)
Slice parameters at z=5.74m
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6z-<z>, mm
sl.e
mitt
ance
, mm
mra
d
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
beam
cur
rent
, A
XYemit (Gaussian, 4.4ps) XYemit (f lat-top)
XYemit (ellipsoid) current (Gaussian 4.4ps)
current (flat-top) current (ellipsoid)
1.02
0.65
0.42
0.62
0.44
0.34
0.50
0.37
0.290.35
0.260.21
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
Trms=4.4ps 20ps/2ps Trms=Trms(f-t)
Gaussian flat-top Ellipsoid
100%
95%
90%
80%
Core emittance
3D ellipsoidal
temporal profile Gaussian Flat-top
transverse distribution
Trms ps 4,4 5,8 5,8
XYrms mm 0,427 0,415 0,389
Ek eV
th.emit. mm mrad 0,36 0,35 0,33
Ecath MV/m
phase deg -3,1 -1,9 -2,8
maxBz T -0,2253 -0,2258 -0,2277
maxE 18,5 19,1 19,1
phase deg
charge nC
energy MeV 22,3 22,7 22,8
proj.emit. mm mrad 1,02 0,65 0,42th./proj.em. % 36% 54% 78%<sl.emit.> mm mrad 0,82 0,58 0,41
51 106 270
RF-
gun
3D ellipsoidal
cylindrical
laser shape type
radial homogen.
e-be
am @
EM
SY
1
B~Ipeak/em 2̂
1
0CD
S
boos
t
parameter unit
0,55cath
ode
lase
r
60
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 15
15
BD simulations for bunch charge 1 nC
Transverse phase space at z=5.74m
reduced beam halo almost no beam halo
Projected emittance (1nC) at EMSY1
100%60%
39%0%
20%40%60%80%
100%
Gaussian flat-top Ellipsoid
rel.e
mitt
ance
Electron beam transverse distribution at z=5.74m
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 16
BD simulations for bunch charge 1 nC Projected emittance (1nC) at EMSY1
168%100%
65%0%
50%
100%
150%
Gaussian flat-top Ellipsoid
rel.e
mitt
ance
Electron beam (Z-X) shape at z=5.74m
Longitudinal phase space (Z-Pz) at z=5.74m
less nonlinearity
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 17
Conclusions> Cathode laser pulse shaping is one of the key parameters for a high
brightness photo injector> Nominal temporal pulse shape at PITZ – a flat-top of ~ 20ps FWHM
Short rise/fall time, first trials were performed in 2009, to be checked soon Flat-top modulations: no large impact onto the transverse phase space, but longitudinal
phase space modulations
> Transverse laser distribution: Laser transport and imaging to the cathode “Fresh cathode” effect homogeneous emission area
> Beam dynamics simulations applying a 3D pulse shaping (ellipsoid) for the PITZ injector yield :
significant reduction in beam projected and slice emittance reduced beam halo and less sensitivity to machine parameters less nonlinear longitudinal phase spacepractical realization BMBF project with IAP, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 18
The End
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 19
BD simulations for bunch charge 100 pC
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0 2 4 6 8 10z, m
mm
mra
d
Xemit (Gaussian 4.4ps)
Xemit (flat-top)
Xemit (ellipsoid)
Slice parameters at z=5.74m
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6z-<z>, mm
sl.e
mitt
ance
, mm
mra
d
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
beam
cur
rent
, A
XYemit (Gaussian 4.4ps) XYemit (flat-top)XYemit (ellipsoid) current (Gaussian 4.4ps)current (flat-top) current (ellipsoid)
0.32
0.18
0.13
0.2
0.130.11
0.16
0.110.09
0.11
0.08 0.07
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
Gaussian flat-top Ellipsoid
100%
95%
90%
80%
Core emittance
3D ellipsoidal
temporal profile Gaussian Flat-top
transverse distribution
Trms ps 4,4 5,8 5,8
XYrms mm 0,175 0,154 0,125
Ek eV
th.emit. mm mrad 0,15 0,13 0,11
Ecath MV/m
phase deg -1,5 1,4 0,8
maxBz T -0,2245 -0,2250 -0,2240
maxE 16,7 21,3 16,9
phase deg
charge nC
energy MeV 20,7 24,7 20,8
proj.emit. mm mrad 0,320 0,182 0,128th./proj.em. % 46% 72% 83%<sl.emit.> mm mrad 0,17 0,14 0,12
81 165 368
parameter unit
0,55cath
ode
lase
r
60
e-be
am @
EM
SY
1
B~Ipeak/em^2
RF-
gun
3D ellipsoidal
cylindrical
laser shape type
radial homogen.
0,1
0CD
S
boos
t
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 20
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
x, mm
y, m
m
20
BD simulations for bunch charge 100 pC
Transverse phase space at z=5.74m
almost no beam halo
Projected emittance (100pC) at EMSY1
100%57% 40%
0%20%40%60%80%
100%
Gaussian flat-top Ellipsoid
rel.e
mitt
ance
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
x, mm
y, m
m
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
x, mm
px, m
rad
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 2121
BD simulations for bunch charge 100 pC Projected emittance (100pC) at EMSY1
175%100% 70%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
Gaussian flat-top Ellipsoid
rel.e
mitt
ance
Electron beam (Z-X) shape at z=5.74m
Longitudinal phase space (Z-Pz) at z=5.74m
Mikhail Krasilnikov | Cathode Laser Pulse Shaping For High Brightness Electron Sources | FLS 2012, 6.03.2012 | Page 22
BD simulations for bunch charge 1 nC Tolerances
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
-1.0% -0.8% -0.6% -0.4% -0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% 1.0%
solenoid detuning
emitt
ance
gro
wth
Gauss
flat-top
Ellipsoid
optimain
optimainmain III )(
In the case of the ellipsoidal shaping the electron beam quality is less sensitive to machine parameters (e.g. main solenoid peak field)